Your students are most fortunate to have you as a instructor.
@stewarthicks2 жыл бұрын
Thank you!!
@mitzichairez55643 жыл бұрын
I'm a senior arch student and I personally had lost interest on school and pursuing architecture, but seeing this and going back to the basics makes me realize why I choose this in the beginning so THANK YOU!
@MyFatherLooksLikeAPallasCat3 жыл бұрын
I came here from ArchDaily’s article. This is amazing, I’m still an architecture student and I really appreciate videos like this. Thank you and please keep up the good work!
@pcatful Жыл бұрын
Wish this were available when I started out. Now it's more about reflection than the future for me.
@philiplacey54303 жыл бұрын
The earth is an oblate spheroid not an oblong spheroid
@stewarthicks3 жыл бұрын
Good catch.
@albertbatfinder52402 жыл бұрын
I knew if I scrolled far enough I’d find this. Moral: Scroll first, comment as last resort.
@MBlakeH3 жыл бұрын
Yo! THIS SHIT FIRE! For real, I wish these videos were around when I was going through school! Keep up the good work!
@DirtyDdddddddddddddd3 жыл бұрын
Another fantastic video. One rant: I have noticed in the archisphere, lots of people call shapes ‘geometries’. But the plural of geometry should be used only when talking about multiple studies of geometric relationships (Euclidean, spheroid, hyperbolic etc…) as a geometer first and architect second, it’s just a bug bear of mine
@stewarthicks3 жыл бұрын
Hmm, you're right. It's not something I thought too much about. I'll try to clean up my act!
@Tiwiwie002 жыл бұрын
Hey, can you clarify with a couple of examples? when to use the plural or singulars? I do love some good linguistic pedantry, and I can't wait to bug friends and colleagues!
@DirtyDdddddddddddddd2 жыл бұрын
@@Tiwiwie00 Euclidean geometry + spheroid geometry + hyperbolic geometry = 3 different geometries Note the use of singular ‘geometry’ and plural ‘geometries’. Hope that makes sense. Another archispeak linguistic bastardisation that makes this pedant twitch is the use of typology to mean type. ie Typology is the study of types, not the element (type) of itself. I think, just like management speak, architects like to use terms that sound smarter than standard words to obfuscate and create a sense of deeper knowledge/understanding than the layperson. Most people understand ‘shape’ and ‘type’, however if you use ‘geometries’ and ‘typology’ apparently you sound more learned. … rant over
@Tiwiwie002 жыл бұрын
@@DirtyDdddddddddddddd I see what you mean now. I have similar feelings on how people mix up isometric, axonometric and oblique projections.
@DirtyDdddddddddddddd2 жыл бұрын
@@Tiwiwie00 that one upsets me as well, but I do see it as different to the two examples I give I believe the iso vs axo vs oblique is more a mistake of not understanding the difference, and it is a little technical… which a lot of current architecture pedagogy tries to stay away from. But I believe ‘geometries’ and building ‘typologies’ are used erroneously to make one sound smarter. Less of an innocent mistake. (This is all next level pedantry, and in-person I let people think and talk how they wish. But these matters keep me awake at night! It’s always good to meet a fellow pedant in the YT comments section)
@Adshercott2 жыл бұрын
This scratches THE itch for me. In middle-school I wanted to be an architect. The universe conspired against me, and now I'm a music major, but I still want to learn ALL of it.
@Tiwiwie002 жыл бұрын
It's never too late to go back, or combine the two...
@pradap22982 жыл бұрын
mine civil but i love to learn a)
@latneyb3 жыл бұрын
So happy to find this channel.
@piraterubberduck60562 жыл бұрын
Geometry is a fascinating thing to use in Architecture. I designed a building in a geodesic dome while at uni. It was a challenge that I learnt a lot from as the Geometry forced me to play by its rules.
@mowgli63453 жыл бұрын
I'm studying architecture purely for drawing purposes, but these videos are really entertaining and educational!
@stewarthicks3 жыл бұрын
Glad you’re enjoying them!
@Josh-yr7gd Жыл бұрын
I like how you explained how the Fibonacci sequence can be derived from the 1.61:1 aspect ratio and also where that comes from. This was a mind blowing moment!
@lindsaywebb19043 жыл бұрын
Another great video. My first professor, (more than 30 years ago now... Ouch) was an old Hungarian disciple of the metaphysician Coomaraswarmy and introduced to us the metaphysical aspects of geometry, and to the idea that it is the relationship to number that is ultimately important. The premise was that many cultures developed (unconnected) practices and rites from the truths contained in Zero(the void) and one (existence). All the other numbers and therefore geometry fall into place once this has been established. It's a nice way to break down the persistent Eurocentric gravity of western architectural education, but it also quickly leads to the dogma of monotheistic religions (pick your flavour). It sounds like bullshit but as computers have brought non-euclidian geometry to the masses (some kind of geometrical orgy if you will), maybe it's time to rethink what geometry means and consider if we can ever free ourselves from it.
@paulaharrisbaca48512 жыл бұрын
I am relieved to find a channel with comments that are intelligent and erudite. Maybe I should class up the channels I look at normally. So I just subscribed to dis guy's.
@Tiwiwie002 жыл бұрын
Can you clarify some computer programs that include non-Euclidean geometry? I literally have not seen a single one. and I'd love to see the use of it! intuitively it sounds really impractical, but I've found that most learning is found when intuition is questioned.
@lindsaywebb19042 жыл бұрын
@@Tiwiwie00 modelling applications still all operate in a Cartesian co-ordinate system (as far as I know) but modern applications have all the tools to easily work with ellipsoid and hyperbolic geometries. Rhino happens to be the tool I use and all the modelling is done with so-called NURBS which can easily describe Euclidean and non-Euclidean surface geometries
@vilecypher3 жыл бұрын
I've been looking for this in-depth discussions on architecture and built environment for the past few years. This channel might become big.
@timcameron90233 жыл бұрын
Great video. Geometry reminds me of grammar, which came later on than human to human communication, and was an attempt to describe, control and provide rules.
@somubetageri3 жыл бұрын
I would recommend you to go through, the ancient Indian system of architecture and planning called as "Vaastu Shastra". Study the age old temples still standing. All you have come out now is just a tiny bit of a very sophisticated and complex science.
@stewarthicks3 жыл бұрын
I’ll look into it. Thanks for the suggestion.
@pierren___3 жыл бұрын
True 🤝
@panparami66002 жыл бұрын
I feel like what I've so far in architecture has been further enhanced by your videos! I've been really enjoying learning more, so thank you! Also, as someone from IL who is studying abroad right now, it's nice to see Chicago from your works c:
@matthewsallman17002 жыл бұрын
Thanks for featuring the Detroit Symphony as your musical example! I'm catching up on your older videos and that's the second time in two days that Detroit has appeared. The Detroit Institute of Art was shown when mentioning Paul Cret in a Louis Kahn video.
@richardengelhardt5822 жыл бұрын
A brilliant lecture to introduce new students to the practice of architecture. Useful too in a program intended to introduce university students to professional choices - better than anything else I've seen.
@livelikeitslegal2 жыл бұрын
Ten thumbs up for the Patriot cameo! You musta been ROFLing during that scene. The show has some great architecture too!
@stewarthicks2 жыл бұрын
It's honestly one of my favorite recent shows.
@IOUaUsername2 жыл бұрын
It's surprising how many architects don't understand geometry. I can't count the number of times I've overheard the sales staff at my consulting job explaining to an architect that they can't put 150mm insulation in a 90mm stud frame wall.
@TheDullRainbow3 жыл бұрын
My first studio professor was obsessed with the golden ratio. He would have us cut the rectangle out and PRECISELY measure and draw the arcs and lines to show the golden ratio. We were to use rapidograph pens only and all drawn lines had to be used with a straight edge or compass
@pradap22982 жыл бұрын
does the golden ratio will implement in the building? how does it work
@TheDullRainbow2 жыл бұрын
@@pradap2298 honestly, i didn't ever gain much use from the golden ratio. It's good if you are trying to lay out a facade geometrically, but other than that, the ratio isn't really used in any building material sizes or standard opening sizes or room sizes or anything really. It's more of a conceptual tool.
@insaflamouchi4243 Жыл бұрын
us too !
@jubileeayubacabalar47103 жыл бұрын
Hi Stewart I love your videos they have been really helpful to me as a 2nd year architecture student in the UK! I was wondering if you could also make videos on architecture that isn't just based on the Western architects that we tend to learn about in architecture school although this is helpful for my degree it would be great to see more diversity.
@stewarthicks3 жыл бұрын
Jubilee, I'd love to. This is just the beginning of the channel and it will certainly grow and diversity.
@umbaradesign3 жыл бұрын
I come from a clothing line and find immense value in this video. Feeling like I found gold nuggets
@SaiSantoshMARU3 жыл бұрын
That was good Stewart, strong sentence at the end! 14:20
@ursusss3 жыл бұрын
Looking at the quality and the topics of your clips, you deserve way more views
@stewarthicks3 жыл бұрын
Working on it!!
@ursusss3 жыл бұрын
@@stewarthicks I'm rooting for you! If half of my university professors would have been like you, I wouldn't have been a failed architect that switched to graphic design :D
@johntaylor97763 жыл бұрын
Great video! Thanks for the content. I really have grown to appreciate architecture with a little bit more depth. Youre doing a really great thing here for your art medium. Its important that we express our passions, they are only defined how theyre perceived. youre widening my perception of architecture.
@conceptcurator2 жыл бұрын
I know I’m late to this video, but I might argue that the most precise circle is not in fact the definition because that definition is only communicable and understood in the language that it’s written. The definition of a circle in another language may require drawing on different concepts to explain the matter, so the psychological process the language facilitate for form the image on the mind might be different, and even have a different result. A compass-drawn circle, while impossible to perfect, is an incredibly close approximation and can be understood regardless of the perceiver’s language, which seems like it would give to credit to the counter-position - that a really well drawn circle is the most precise circle. Even more precise are the circles we can develop on monitors whose resolution (and pixel density) is so high that we can’t make out an individual pixel.
@alistairwilson53442 жыл бұрын
Epicycles in ancient Greek astronomy persisted for centuries partially because of the same dissonance {and the catholic church's geocentric doctrine).
@michellebyrom6551 Жыл бұрын
The comment you made about Le Corbusier and his using a 6' man for a standard measure gave me an explanation. Standard kitchen and bathroom fittings, particularly for height, don't work for me at 5' 6". I've learned how to live with it of course. My mother was 5' 2" and watching her work as a professional cook was painful at times. Try making pastry in a deep bowl on a worktop that is far too high. It strains all of your upper body muscles as you try to lift yourself up to use your hands properly. For me that's standard dining table height. The man had some interesting ideas, but I've noticed in the past that he missed some of the practical details in his plans. Taking the average height of adults in a geographic area is a detail so obvious many overlook it.
@superadventure62972 жыл бұрын
The 'Delight' property is one of the most contested concepts with architecture critics and historians, especially of the conservative/traditionalist mindset. It's striking how many people truly believe that beauty is 100% objective and fixed, like proportions, and that something they don't like is factually ugly. With all the zoning laws and ordinances today which are reactions to this mindset, it has created a lot of samey-same designs everywhere especially in housing.
@rvxn Жыл бұрын
Amazing video, Your students are be lucky to have such instructor.
@pierren___3 жыл бұрын
9:00 same for the squares and lines. Too Perfect.
@tahaks3 жыл бұрын
Looks like you're a real fan of rhino! I see that rhino 7 title! I got mine the week it came out.
@directionofease2 жыл бұрын
Super rich video, Stewart: interdisciplinary in the extreme. Bravo.
@alaskanuni3 жыл бұрын
I started grad school designing based on these ideas. I finished grad school post-rationalizing these ideas into my presentations. Now I design based on the IBC/IRC and use these ideas when available.
@alaskanuni3 жыл бұрын
I am very impressed by architects who are able to have these ideas in their finished product. Big concepts are REALLY difficult to carry through a design.
@0super3 жыл бұрын
fantastic episode!!
@stewarthicks3 жыл бұрын
Thank you Jimenez!
@mabus49102 жыл бұрын
In Europe, our paper sizes are governed by the golden ratio. Din A0 (Deutsche Industrie Norm A0) is a sheet of one square meter and the promotions of the golden ratio. An A1 sheet is A0 cut in half and so on. The most common size is A4. It is used for home printers, notebooks, letters and so on.
@mabus49102 жыл бұрын
@Sathish V You are right. Thank you. It seems to be a common misconception that it is based on the golden ratio. Thank you for pointing it out to me.
@grahamkane29933 жыл бұрын
When one learns to Medatate. One of the first things that you will see is Geometry shapes and patterns.. It's a kind of language. A fabric like grid, that exstends across the vastness of the universe. Like a multy dimentional map of time, containing all knowladge. I'll start drawing the paterns, that I can see. They're really exsighting. 😇 Different from the common ones. Thanks, cool vid. 🎯 G.
@ARBKartikeyVikramSingh2 жыл бұрын
I believe that you would definitely have research papers or essays, tell me where could I find those.... Cause you particular use of language is fascinating and help a lot to understand architecture for a student such as my self
@valchiria57142 жыл бұрын
I really appreciate videos like this too, are awesome!
@MK-nl6po2 жыл бұрын
Dude dude dude keep ‘em coming!
@matthewluck90772 жыл бұрын
Omg I drew up il palazzo del lavoro for a course at my university last semester. So sad that the building isn’t used these days
@SHHEMP13 жыл бұрын
once again, great content
@nguyen35452 жыл бұрын
I just found the channel and I gotta say that I really love your videos!
@andrewprahst25293 жыл бұрын
ACKTCHUALLY the first four digits of the golden mean are 1.618, so you should be rounding up to 1.62 if using three digits. Man, I hope you didn't design any buildings with that blunder
@stewarthicks3 жыл бұрын
Oh no, my proportions are all off!
@Tiwiwie002 жыл бұрын
Technically correct the best kind of correct
@middleburyastrology2 жыл бұрын
Very interesting. I wonder where the Tetractys and a 1000 years of musings in arithmology (500bc to 500ce) sits within these ideas and the human intent that got us here. I love the clip expressing that nature doesn't produce perfect circles...interesting to ponder...perhaps perfection is just plane not a natural state. Thank you.
@alistairwilson53442 жыл бұрын
That's why all Persian rugs have deliberate mistakes in them...
@middleburyastrology2 жыл бұрын
Really neat thing to consider, thanks :)
@yopjss2 жыл бұрын
I love your videos thank you for your time and for your effort, all the informations wow inspire me to be a better archictec
@Kolumaic Жыл бұрын
What I took from this video is that the bathroom toilet should be positioned in the center of the golden ratio where the flushing of the toilet's Coriolis effect completes the spiral.
@praiseadeola4 ай бұрын
Amazing Video! Thank you!
@sheshwanth3 жыл бұрын
Nice take on geometry
@KhanyoMjamba2 жыл бұрын
Wish they had KZbin when I was an archi student 2004-2005, before I dropped out.
@ashleyparker46503 жыл бұрын
Yay Stewart!!
@jmajlesnaber30412 жыл бұрын
architecture is so interesting 😳
@rory35562 жыл бұрын
This was really concise, useful and fascinating! Thanks
@davidszabo85133 жыл бұрын
Hey Stewart! Great video! I was looking for a video that explains or somehow suspects that how built environment can effect our emotions, I think this video is a good start for me! Ps.. can you tell me what movie clip did you use at 9:00?
@stewarthicks3 жыл бұрын
It’s from a show called the patriot on Amazon prime.
@pedroedsos Жыл бұрын
Were you taught / does your institution teach Descriptive Geometry? To which depth? What is the standard in USA?
@xxGytis15xx3 жыл бұрын
I love how you used a scene from Patriot, such an underrated show, with fantastic cinematography , great video btw!
@stewarthicks3 жыл бұрын
Haha Thanks!!! My current favorite show, on recommendation from my good friend Grant Gibson. "We make circles..."
@OkieDokieSmokie3 жыл бұрын
You're getting a like for the Patriot clip. Great show.
@stewarthicks3 жыл бұрын
Love it.
@jjdavidian Жыл бұрын
Euclid has been credited for geometry by europeans however he took it from ancient egyptians had already measured lands and earth long before him .. As the greeks (Ptolemeans) settled in Egypt they learnt from the locals ...
@cacogenicist2 жыл бұрын
Sophisticated surveying actually goes back to Babylonia. They understood Pythagorean triples.
@guruvarshini48203 жыл бұрын
Amazing!!
@e11235813213455891442 жыл бұрын
it is my firm belief that the golden ratio is the random seed used to generate this instance of the universe
@BlackMagickMike2 жыл бұрын
"Where I think it goes off the rails is when things are made complicated just for the sake of it." 🎯
@martinwilke1980 Жыл бұрын
It would have been worth mentioning that the golden ratio is not a rational number like 1.61 but has infinitely many decimal places.
@PaulTamm2 жыл бұрын
14:25 "Geometry is an invention", or is it a discovery?
@stevenikitas81702 жыл бұрын
I have long maintained that the computer generation of architecture has produced a bland "digital sameness"... The architects no longer are doing the work, which loses its humanity. Computers are great aides but they can never substitute for the human brain. I believe that Eero Saarinen (1910-1961) was The Last Great Architect.
@creativevideo24947 ай бұрын
sir you are my fevorite
@dyscotopia2 жыл бұрын
I'd be curious about exploring the connection between geometry as it's used now and the sacred geometric principles embodied in Islamic holy places. They were precise about everything
@naarch Жыл бұрын
Thanks
@PHCeo_JM2 жыл бұрын
Actually the golden ratio is closer to 1:1.62 because it can be more accurately represented as 1:1.618
@b_ks Жыл бұрын
Fun Fact: The ratio of a kilometer to a mile is 1.6093 to 1.0000 or 1.61:1 ☺️
@pierren___3 жыл бұрын
4:48 omg where Can i find this video
@oswald2358 Жыл бұрын
👍👍👍👍
@paulaharrisbaca48512 жыл бұрын
You know what is really weird, having to do with your video tangentially? I was just THINKING, mind you, THINKING to myself, not out loud, as I drove down a street (Bryant St, by the Hall of Justice, in San Francisco) which I do all the time,( and I've been watching yet another of an alarming number of new mini-apartment buildings going up in a city that's losing people to live in them daily, while more and more Americans live on the street, but I digress) and as I pass this nearly completed apartment/office complex, I thought to myself, (again I don't think out loud) about how blueprints are drawn and how the flat drawings on paper get translated to an actual 3D building, and how architects decide what materials to use, and the most efficient use of space, and also why most buildings built since the WWII era are just big boxes with doohickeys or gimmicks stuck on. Le Corbusier and Bauhaus and all that trash. But the point is after just thinking about it, suddenly I get home and get online and KZbin had your video on bricks and if they want to be arches or not came recommended on the first line of recommendations. THAT is some creepy sh*t. (I'm glad it did, actually, but I think I may have to start wearing an aluminum foil hat.....or would actual tin foil be better, you think? You're an architect....)
@vedantsingla17212 жыл бұрын
Le Corbusier designed our city Chandigarh 😄
@ronanrox3 жыл бұрын
1.618...=¶...I know, I know, it goes on forever and never repeats...but the third digit...come oooon.))) Childishness aside.... it's a great quality video.... should have more interest towards it.
@manlike_xzy3 жыл бұрын
13:30 what building is this please?
@pierren___3 жыл бұрын
10:50 modular man
@dionysianapollomarx3 жыл бұрын
Hi, is there a book for architecture and geometry? It'd be great for deeper reading.
@alistairwilson53442 жыл бұрын
Robert Laylor's Sacred Geometry is a great place to start, but, beware , there's a whole rabbit hole of cosmic dot to dot lunacy out there too....Have fun.
@JudgeFredd Жыл бұрын
Which movie excerpt around 9:00 ?
@JudgeFredd Жыл бұрын
Found it Patriot
@stephenspackman5573 Жыл бұрын
I have two hesitations about your presentation of Le Corbusier's Modulor: First, I can see how a 6ft height for a ‘standard’ person can be read as a gender bias, among other things, but what does it have to do with skin colour? Second, 6ft? Le Corbusier wasn't Commonwealth or American, was he? Did he really use Imperial measure in his work? _That_ would be a noteworthy bias! According to Wikipedia-and I'm not claiming Wikipedia as the source of all truth, but assuming for the moment they got this one right-Le Corbusier's base was 175cm, or a little under 5ʹ9ʺ, a height which currently (again, going by Wikipedia data :-}) currently favours women over men in some countries, such as the Netherlands. Indeed, it falls between (though at the high end of the bracket) the WHO's estimates for healthy adult males and healthy adult females worldwide-suggesting that it is biased more in favour of _relatively wealthy people with good diet and health care_ than white males. Statistically correlated, I grant you, but not the same thing. This is not to say that ill-intent was absent. I used to know someone who worked at Intel, and it was absolutely striking that the cubicle-based office space they used at the time had the property that the typical male employee could easily look over the tops of the partitions, and the typical female employee could not. It's hard to imagine that being an accident.
@JoannaEve2 жыл бұрын
How much math does an architect need? Geometry and calculus?
@jordi21863 жыл бұрын
And now we can explore even more complex geometries in softwares like rhino and grasshopper.
@twilightprince819010 ай бұрын
wouldnt a bubble be a perfect circle or at least a perfect sphere?
@Dev1nci Жыл бұрын
So is Stewart a Gehry anti-fan?
@silverglass66353 жыл бұрын
Stewart is reading. Eventually he may learn to speak naturally. Keep up the good work.
@superadventure62972 жыл бұрын
Yes, but do you realize it's nearly impossible to talk through a long essay like this- without messing up so many times that you'd spend a month editing it? Try it- you'll realize the most efficient way to get all the right words across is to read a script. Some don't show their faces so it may fool you into thinking they aren't but they are. Including Simon Whistler- one of the most popular creators on the platform reads scripts- every time!
@silverglass66352 жыл бұрын
@ Super Adventure: there is nothing wrong with reading a script. He is doing a good job and eventually he will get so good and natural that we will not realize he is reading at all, whether we see his face or not.
@superadventure62972 жыл бұрын
@@silverglass6635 Right, that's true. There's also the possibility of editing out the bits where one stares too strongly at the screen etc. Overall I think he's a good reader; and his scripts are good. His interior decor is also awesome
@OfficiallyDrippy2 жыл бұрын
Arigato, Gyro.
@dlwatib3 жыл бұрын
Le Corbusier abused geometry. His "man" is disproportionate in the extreme. But in his defense PC "inclusiveness" hadn't been invented yet, and he never specified that his 6' tall man was white. Academics should be ashamed of themselves for projecting their own value system onto a past where it's completely unknown and therefore meaningless, and infecting their students with the bad habit of projecting current biases anachronistically onto our forefathers instead of training them to fairly and objectively evaluate them in the context of their own milieu. Such revisionism always must be guarded against and condemned in all academic disciplines. It's misleading to say "the starting point is completely arbitrary". The whole point of geometry is to relate things to each other through the ratios of their measures. Le Corbusier had a valid point, misguided though his system ultimately was. His point was that buildings are made for the use, occupancy and delight of mankind, therefore the measure of an "ideal" man should be the basis of measure for his buildings. It would have been even less inclusive for him to have based his Modulor on the 5' height of a small woman because then what man could stand upright and fit through the doorways?
@2adamast3 жыл бұрын
And by his name alone, I would guess that he or his forefather was black.
@gregegg-ef1kl3 жыл бұрын
4:28 ahh dynamo 😭
@Shyeena3 жыл бұрын
I enjoyed this immensely. On a side note, just have to say that I never expected that anyone speaking about Geometry and Architecture would find a perfect segway to slide in a commentary about "inclusivity" 🤔 It seems that no topic escapes this (IMHO) over used and divisive political narrative 🙄 I bet most in these fields see the 6' White male... as just a 6' white male. Isn't that okay? Can't wait until Vitruvian man becomes anything but white 😏 and DaVinci is cancelled.
@stewarthicks3 жыл бұрын
Thank you for your comment and I recognize the sentiment. However, when people claim that something is one-size-fits-all and the world should live with a single human's "universal" design strategy, it's also probably good to identify the flaws in that logic.
@mancinidesignbuild2 жыл бұрын
Because only white males can be 6’-0”, not asians, blacks or martians. I don’t recall modular man being known as white modular man.
@alistairwilson53442 жыл бұрын
Yeah,would love to see what the Vitruvian woman would look like !
@rexyoda2 жыл бұрын
Bubbles?
@Albert._3 жыл бұрын
ngl, he kinda look like Ryan Reynolds with a mustache
@stewarthicks3 жыл бұрын
I'll take it.
@Albert._3 жыл бұрын
@@stewarthicks excellent. I wasn't selling anything else
@paulaharrisbaca48512 жыл бұрын
OK one last comment....(I always feel compelled to bore the bloody 'ell out of anyone whose videos I like and I keep thinking of new things every couple of moments....) 3:40 I like what you say about that we can only create things we can imagine. I also am of the opinion that anything we can imagine is a possible thing and that which we cannot imagine (yet, anyway) may be outside our grasp. It's the thought of that which made me switch from being a half-a$$ed atheist back to a believer in a Creator. It's also why our public school system wants to dumb down children as much as possible, because an uneducated population is much much easier to control. In my home state, California, the party in charge has succeeded so well that we've gone from being in the top 3 in education to 49th within 25 years. Our appointed governor has happily told America that as California goes, so goes the nation. Let us hope to Euclid that he's just doing wishful thinking. (altho if he gets recalled, there may be some positives in that comment) OK, I'm done, I swear. KZbin often just chucks my comments out and the channel Creator never gets to see them, so this point may be moot.
@br22663 жыл бұрын
Architect's don't have tattoos either, and if they do like this video depicts, then that Architect shouldn't be trusted, as he will never grow and learn, always seeing himself as being "someone."
@lemon_n_mint3 жыл бұрын
Hey, Can I know where is this video from ? 8:56
@stewarthicks3 жыл бұрын
A show called Patriot. It's awesome!
@abdurrabbwatkins8422 жыл бұрын
Euclid invented geometry… the Pyramids crew were just scratching lines in the sand, huh?
@TruthHurts907 Жыл бұрын
Two words.. creators code
@rogerconnolly3688Ай бұрын
You might find my channel interesting. It has videos on how architects like Aalto and Foster use Sacred Geometry
@arch.rblorio24552 жыл бұрын
ey
@paulaharrisbaca48512 жыл бұрын
Oh I can't help one more 4:42 or thereabouts (I have a fondness for 442 because I own a 1971 442)....don't those three attributes of Vitruvius remind us more earthy-minded people of the way men feel about their own male attributes.... "commodity, firmness, and delight". It's a floor wax AND a dessert topping! (that's a SNL joke but you likely know that, but you are perhaps a couple decades too young for me to be sure)
@ElAnvaBar2 жыл бұрын
I'm sorry? Because it uses a slightly above average white male as a base? It's just using a 6ft person. And the proportions in the drawings don't even seem to properly match a person. This is just unfounded and inappropriate.