GIANT BUILDING COLLAPSING LIVE ON CAMERA ❢ CATERPILLAR 385C HIGH REACH EXCAVATOR AT DEMOLITION JOB

EPIC DEMOLITION FAIL❢ Incident during demolition works: the building should be demolished piece by piece but collapsed. The reason could be not enough structural steel in the concrete as a failure at the erection of the building.
➡️ LEAVE A 👍 LIKE 👍 AND FEEL FREE TO SHARE THIS VIDEO! ☑️
WHAT HAPPENED BEFORE:
🎥 ▶ • CATERPILLAR 324E BAGGE...
SUBSCRIBE FOR FREE AND DON'T MISS NEW VIDEOS! ☑️
➡️ www.youtube.com...
Get notification for new video: Click the 🔔 bell 🔔 next to Subscribe above.

[@butschibutschi8184]

ich behaupte mal der fahrer hat sein tagessoll bis frühstück geschafft :-)... aber viel glück gehabt

[@DREAMMACHINEShh]

no freezing temperatures and no rain that day or before, the water is from a hose to reduce the dust

[@fossilforty8500]

Was für eine sensationelle Aufnahme!

[@gamersam3920]

The crane operator must having been shitting bricks when the debris was fallibf

[@alex46215]

holy crap there is no steel in that building

[@MTSmoment]

Alex Jones nope not atorl

[@operator_since_birth7799]

Wenn ein Gebäude kollabiert hat man keine Chance und kann nur hoffen, dass man nicht in der Nähe des Falles ist. Wäre hier das ganze Gebäude noch zusätzlich eingestürzt, es wäre niemals so glimpflich abgegangen wie hier. Ja, etwas mehr als Glück gehabt.

[@mrbluenun]

Kartanimal29, WFT. To DDTV, Thank you for this video, not because it was so dramatic, though it WAS! But because I hope it might get into the everyday MO of Site staff when Boss or bricky, never ever stand around a machine or a building which is in the process of getting Demolished, as that could have happened at exactly the same time this went bad, and with the sudden ‘no control’ the pieces weighing several tons and sharp window and steel bounced way out of the envelope that was the building

[@LaurentLaborde]

They were very productive this day :))

[@riparianlife97701]

Nowhere near enough steel. The ends of the broken concrete beams should be bristling with rebar, but I don't see any.

[@legendario13]

1:37 the Pyro Laughing

[@mrbluenun]

It was maybe the water from rain and or the dust suppression that soaked into the fabric, and maybe there was a few freezing days and thats what made this disaster, but I am no expert so can’t say why but respect the machines and any part demolished or even building waiting to be demolished on any similar site and do not take things for granted. Unless you find out this and the falling concrete and masonry may always be a mystery? Certainly no person to blame though.

[@Smokie181]

now you just have to tip the side over...brilliant!

[@flailios]

Looks fine to me

[@gregg4164]

Wow that building sheared itself right in half. No, no structural steel at all from the looks of it.

[@CyberPolygon2077]

Haha Inside Job

[@laydbakk1]

Saved a few weeks of nibbling away at it...

[@garythesquidsquid7779]

It made the entire structure weak. Demolishing the rest of this must have been incredily sketchy and dificult. I work in the industry, and we call that pancaking. When we park bobcats on raised slab, we have to park them on seperate sections of the floor so they dont fall through straight to the basement like this did.

[@rickster348]

- that's why you wear a hard hat, folks.

[@Friedhof1]

Now compare this to WTC!

[@wesward9310]

What's too blame is weight of the roof with no support and poor steel reinforcing the machine driver had done nothing wrong and it was just a poorly made concrete slab and age has an affect as we'll

[@garythesquidsquid7779]

No, the operator wasnt at fault. The demolition engineers and project managers are at fault for planning it this way.

[@todlindley8101]

Probly saved 50 gallon o diesel - Good Job, try n do same on opposite side

[@kylecampbell1444]

Just like the world trade centers came down.

[@anthonysmith1669]

Except they had steel in them.

[@Woody615]

+Anthony Smith True, but add several floors of concrete and steel above and when it collapsed, not even steel could stop it.

[@anthonysmith1669]

Woody615 And therein lies the problem. According to Sir Isaac Newton, the steel SHOULD have stopped it.

[@Woody615]

Actually no. Per Sir Isaac Newton, it did exactly what it was supposed to do. The steel can hold up the potential energy per Sir Issac Newton, but once a part starts to collapse, due to being hit by a plane and the fires weakening (not melting) the steel, you add the kinetic energy of the motion, per Sir Issac Newton, to the potential energy of the weight and it now exceeds the holding strength of the steel. Once that the energy exceeds the capacity of the steel, the entire building starts to collapse, and it cascades just like this building did.

[@brucegotohell1323]

+Woody615 It didn't suprise anyone in the crew that it would happen; only the timing. I've watched several of these high-reach demo's. The initial stage is always to "tunnel-out" a channel down the center-line, as was done here, to weaken the structure severely and to create a central collection point for the rubble. It allows the operator to access the whole building from inside to pull it inward (as was underway) away from the abutting streets. I saw one demo that actually had two tunnels because it was L-shaped and too large for one tunnel.

[@JackMacLupus]

Da haben die aber Glück gehabt das die beiden Hälften stehen geblieben sind. Hätte auch noch schlimmer kommen können wenn eine oder beide Hälften gekippt wären.

[@mrbluenun]

What might have helped in addition to the other thing I said, might have been an expert in structural engineering rather than perhaps someone who "Has done this before and I know what I am doing" kind of thing, structural engineers would look really closely at the age and type of the concrete, and where the RSJ (Rolled Steel Joists) were joined as they never run right across this building. The machine Op is a good ten floor high and that fall could have pulled the stick and machine down.

[@s0undw4v3ultra]

like they say accidents happen and when in demolition work its a very dangerous job

[@mrbluenun]

I realise the water vapour/spray is to suppress the dust, I was just putting forward possible ideas of why a good chunk of this building should surprise the machine operator and the other worker and everyone around it.

[@heikeschroder1643]

krass

[@pfau_acht]

Na da hat doch einer Zeit gespart. Zum Glück ist keinem was passiert.

[@jackspizza8155]

Woops

[@hollmanrigobertorodriguezc2278]

muy valiente el que hizo este video

[@FelixS5S]

Is this a kinda new building? Doesnt looks old at all

[@Schule04]

+Félix Santiago No, it was built in the 1960s

[@romearomeo]

😱😱😱😱😱😱

[@88pablo18]

I bet that crane operator was shitting his pants! Must of thought the lot was coming down on him. Not much that rubber screen he was holding up would of done for him.

[@stomagg]

direkt bei mir um die ecke :|

[@Hobbietrucker79]

Wie ist das denn passiert, bzw wodurch?? Zu viel Wasser auf dem Dach gewesen??

[@LiebherrR934B]

Das lag meiner Meinung daran, das das Dach eine zugroße Spannweite hate, nachdem der Fahrer die Fasade vorne aufmachte. Da in dem Gebäude nur auße Stützen vorhanden waren, war das schon ziemlich instabiel. Das Dach hate dann einfach ein zu großes Gewicht (wegen Dachpappe und Dämung) bei einer zu großen Spannweite. Deshalb brach die Decke nach unten, und riss Stockwerk für Stockwerk mit. Der fahrer konnte aber nichts anderes machen, weil der Ausleger einfach immer noch zu kurz war.

[@Hobbietrucker79]

Liebherr R934B Danke für die Antwort, ja diesen Domino Efekkt hat man ja leider auch schon 2001 beim WTC sehen können. Schönes Wochenende

[@LiebherrR934B]

Hobbietrucker79 Ja, das war eigentlich genau das gleiche wie hier, nur 1000mal größer und Schlimmer. danke gleichfalls

[@Hobbietrucker79]

Ja, leider!!!

[@luckys9308]

Würde mich mal interessieren wie sie mit dem Rest des Gebäude umgegangen sind.

[@KartAnimal29]

What fell?