Spontaneity - Free Formula Sheet: bit.ly/3UszTUF Chemistry PDF Worksheets: www.video-tutor.net/chemistry-basic-introduction.html Full-Length Videos & Exams: www.patreon.com/MathScienceTutor/collections Direct Link to The Full Video: bit.ly/3Zsdhoa
@assilmarref48463 жыл бұрын
The link doesn't work for me , can you reshare it please 🙏🏼
@stephanieholz6292 жыл бұрын
@@assilmarref4846 you need to become a patreon which costs money
@shaleedajayathilaka8919 Жыл бұрын
Tt y
@olayemitemiloluwa6917 Жыл бұрын
😮😮
@jamessoto57233 жыл бұрын
Hey man, I used your videos to study for my MCAT back in 2018, now I'm currently studying for my Step 1 exam in medical school. glad to see you are still pumping out new videos. Thanks for all your good work!
@aojbooker86503 жыл бұрын
wait......why are you doing chemistry calculations in medical school???
@valorantyie98203 жыл бұрын
@@aojbooker8650 you can go to med school as a chemistry major, also you need to take gen chem and ochem for med school soooooo
@aojbooker86503 жыл бұрын
@@valorantyie9820 yes of course you can go to medical school as a chemistry major.....but as far as I understand he is doing chemistry calculations while already being in medical school, which is why I am confused. I'm not sure why in the world he would need to understand Gibbs free energy as a med student. And no I live in Canada so I do not need to take specific chem classes to go to most medical schools. However most medical schools do indeed have a chemistry requirement. For example a medical school could prerequire two introductory chemistry classes in which case I could do ochem and bio chem and completely ignore gen chem.
@yenydimas35982 жыл бұрын
@@aojbooker8650 perhaps he's studying with other videos regarding his subject and not specifically Chem and this was one of the users most recent videos and that's why he said he's glad he's still posting under this specific vid regardless what subject it is
@roshanrejit88442 жыл бұрын
@@aojbooker8650 Wow you can take OCHEM and BIOCHEM without gen chem. Thats interesting.
@georgesadler78308 күн бұрын
Professor Organic Chemistry Tutor, this is a solid Introduction into Gibbs Free Energy, Entropy and Enthalpy in all of AP/General Chemistry. The explanation of formulas, units, spontaneous/nonspontaneous process, along with the calculation of free energy, equilibrium and temperature are exceptional. This is an error free video/lecture on KZbin TV with the Organic Chemistry Tutor.
@hootooh45623 жыл бұрын
I started reading my General Chemistry module today and this was uploaded. You truly are Godsend! Thank you so much for all your work! You've made chemistry more interesting and understandable to students like me. 😭❤️
@buddydiamond8736 Жыл бұрын
I don't know who you are man, but you are an absolute god in my eyes. You have helped me in all my physics classes, my chemistry classes, as well as my diff eq classes. I tip my hat to you, sir. You have saved my life multiple times.
@bwharris20022 жыл бұрын
Just took a Calc 2 test and was watching your videos all night, now I have a Chemistry test tomorrow and will be watching these tonight lmao. This dude is a godsend!
@jackrubin63036 ай бұрын
I am 67 years old and am using your lectures to stop me getting Alzheimer’s disease.
@ريناد-د8ت2 ай бұрын
How come?
@LilP65882 ай бұрын
@@ريناد-د8تTo keep his brain challenged with calculations.
@twogamers582320 күн бұрын
How old are u ?
@sshalominath26462 жыл бұрын
Man did in 44 mins what my teachers couldn’t do in 2 months amen
@tommylynch86456 ай бұрын
Amen 🙏🏻
@arahman20012 жыл бұрын
your calmness kept me attentive throughout the whole lecture, thanks for being a good teacher
@cicadarose36392 жыл бұрын
Thank you for your videos! You have helped me so much over the last three years. I am on my last assignment of chemistry for my degree, so I thought I should tell you what a positive impact you have had on my education. Thank you!
@vivianghobrial3307Ай бұрын
You are an angel sent from heaven, thank you for being a chemistry God, you have explained more than all my professors have combined!
@EmmySilvaVanDriel23 сағат бұрын
This was so helpful, it helped me understand the topic after struggling so much with it
@mariaeugeniagtba3 жыл бұрын
I'm from Brazil and I enjoy hearing the sound of your voice
@joshi913 жыл бұрын
Hi
@joeyjohnsonson43416 ай бұрын
I use your videos to study, and to fall asleep to sometimes. Kinda like how it’s ten times easier to sleep in lectures than it is in my warm bed at night. Plus I get better in my chem class (maybe idk)
@nehir20476 ай бұрын
I have 2 exams tomorrow. One of them is calculus 2 and the other one is chemistry. You helped me with both lectures. I hope my exams will go well. Thank you for everything!!❤️❤️
@marinaserbantez9512 жыл бұрын
Helped me through undergrad and now I’m in my first year of pharmacy school!!
@MusokaKanyungulu-vo7nn11 ай бұрын
Hi how are you doing?
@AT-sk7nm11 ай бұрын
EXACTKY MY GOAL :')
@fathimafathi99872 жыл бұрын
Hey!Glad to knw that u have helped many students...I'm an Indian student..nd i preparing for the NEET entrance examination 2022...Ur classes are helping me throughout to tackle many concept ♥️♥️Thanks a lot... With pleasure,love from India 🇮🇳♥️
@pranavv33112 жыл бұрын
Wow, same bro. Good luck.
@JeewithGodschild Жыл бұрын
Did you clear it?
@rudrapratap32949 ай бұрын
@@JeewithGodschildwith that pfp..i bet she did it
@kanyonbeecher40223 жыл бұрын
Started this chapter yesterday. You are so clutch❤️
@qesava52973 жыл бұрын
Watching your calc playlist. Man you’ve been a massive help, thank-you!
@biscotrash2 жыл бұрын
If it weren't for your explanations i'd be lost, thank you so much!!!
@BahromAbdurakhimov-w4uАй бұрын
I have my olimpiad next week and i think i can do my best with ur help thank u so much ❤❤😊
@AlexIsVeryBored3 жыл бұрын
Just did this today you're more helpful than my teacher xd
@karabisarkarsaha23123 жыл бұрын
Love your teaching. From India
@kabandajamir98442 жыл бұрын
The world's best teacher
@kozhayachallita38332 жыл бұрын
no words can describe how lucky people who knows ure channel are !!!🥰❤
@elpuma922 жыл бұрын
Haven't paid attention in the last 2 lectures, 45min got me right.
@vadaa410 ай бұрын
I have my chem final tomorrow, thnx
@gabothusinfichane30213 жыл бұрын
one word for this guy superb
@evgenistarikov3386 Жыл бұрын
Dear Organic Chemistry Tutor, First of all, many sincere thanks for your efforts! A. There is ONLY ONE BASIC, fundamental Energy Conservation and Transformation Law. It is definitely unique and conceptually indivisible delivering two logically joint concepts - these are Energy Conservation - and Energy Transformation. Still, a more-then-100-years-old conceptual failure has brought us to two separate thermodynamic laws - but this has nothing in common with the actual physics. To come back, they have coined two more fake thermodynamic laws, employed the Probability Theory + Mathematical Statistics, and this has helped formulate the Quantum Mechanics, which is thus a basically metaphysical conceptual construction and thus ought to be only restrictedly fruitful. B. By dividing the basically indivisible law, you are telling about Combinatorics, you are touching Probability Theory, you are even stepping back to Thermodynamics for a while, but... You are NOT answering the poser: WHAT IS ENTROPY, sorry! 1. In the formula S = kB * ln(Ω) you imply, Ω means not a "Huge Number of Microstates", not "Probability", which numerically ranges between [0,1], not even "Wavefunction", which ought to be a purely metaphysical notion, as it is... In effect, Ω ought to be a simplistic algebraic function of Lord Kelvin's Absolute Temperature. This result has been published 100 years ago in JACS. 2. WHAT-ENTROPY-IS-poser has been answered not by Clausius, not by Boltzmann, etc., but by Goethe, who has introduced Mephistopheles, the philosophical embodiment of ENTROPY. 3. Newton did basically know WHAT ENTROPY IS - A Counteraction. 4. That Counteractions do not grow to infinity with the growing Actions, but MUST reach their MAXIMUM values, is the result by Nicky Carnot formalized by Clausius... 5. In effect, Gibbs Energy formula renders implicit the interplay among ALL the relevant Actions (the Enthalpic term) and ALL the Counteractions (the Entropic term). 6. The standard approach you are reporting about is OK for the implicit Enthalpy-Entropy picture, employing it for studying reaction mechanism details is likewise eating soup with fork.🧐
@manii2348 Жыл бұрын
The timing of this is…pheNOMenal
@adrisoa2 жыл бұрын
THANK YOUUUU! I KNOW HOW TO DO MY HOMEWORK NOW
@GyeonghunPyeon3 жыл бұрын
깁스 자유에너지, 엔트로피, 엔탈피 이름만 들어도 무슨 저런 어려운 이름이 다있어라는 생각이 들정도로 친숙해지기 쉽지 않은 단어처럼 느껴지지만 자연상태에서 이러나는 자연스로운 현상임을 이 영상을 통해 인식한 이후에는 한결 이 개념들에 대해 친숙해 진 것 같습니다.
@dragonartgroup69823 жыл бұрын
I wish I could read what you have written because I love Korean language so so much
@JHANSI_REDDY3 жыл бұрын
@@dragonartgroup6982 may be now you can read
@dragonartgroup69823 жыл бұрын
@@JHANSI_REDDY yea I can read now but still can't understand completely :))
@JHANSI_REDDY3 жыл бұрын
@@dragonartgroup6982 how's Google translate helping you out
@dragonartgroup69823 жыл бұрын
@@JHANSI_REDDY omg is awful about Korean just don't use it
@rattyf623011 ай бұрын
Exam in 13 minutes
@arielhickman60878 ай бұрын
HELP HOW DID U DO?? (mine is in 41 minutes) ...everyone said we're fucked
@NoName0697 ай бұрын
Congrats 🥂
@sarahahaha49163 жыл бұрын
this channel is doing gods work
@elijahmunongo94322 жыл бұрын
Just want to say thank you man
@tamaravillagrajerez98246 ай бұрын
Hola, muchas gracias, lamentablemente, no hay videos en español que comenten sobre la formula de energia libre de Gibbs en equilibrio, me has explicado a pesar de mi bajo nivel de ingles, he podido entender todo, te agradezco enormemente, me ayudas con Bioquimica, Greetings from Chile
@GordLamb3 жыл бұрын
Dude, your videos are so good.
@dhivyamaalya3 жыл бұрын
I wish I had seen this channel earlier T-T...better late than never :)
@dragonartgroup69823 жыл бұрын
Same
@nimoosman771611 ай бұрын
You are just amazing thank u
@MuhammadAbdullah-cj6nx2 жыл бұрын
Indeed, you are truly godsend!
@sarahm8747 Жыл бұрын
No one comprares to how well he teaches
@anetgobr3 жыл бұрын
Very useful
@sweetie1208 Жыл бұрын
Thank you!!!! God blessss
@adamgentry80563 жыл бұрын
I really enjoy the videos. I have a question on this one. You discuss K the eq, constant, and say K=1 at equilibrium. Is that not false? K can equal any number of value at equilibrium. I understand that we can use whether K< or > 1 to determine whether it is reactant or product favored, but a K=1 would only tell us the concentrations are equal, not the rate of reaction. Am I misunderstanding this?
@maryamzia31213 жыл бұрын
You are absolutely right. The discussed 3 conditions are actually 3 possibilities at equilibrium
@tamduy77902 жыл бұрын
At equilibrium, the constant K, the rate is constant, and the same, but the concentrations are not the same, they are just constant.
@nurwahyuning95943 жыл бұрын
Thank you 😭. It halped me a lot 😭
@adr47610 ай бұрын
Thnkss bro❤
@mohammadelhayek91553 жыл бұрын
Im gonna go ahead and offer you a job at my school.
@ridadhanani66843 жыл бұрын
You are my hero. I would give up my first born child for you i am not kidding.
@wezen4632 Жыл бұрын
Watching this at 1 am I’ve got a Chem test tomorrow and have no idea what I’m doing lol😭😭
@NedaaAlHaqGh2 жыл бұрын
Thanks 😊
@joshi913 жыл бұрын
Good sir 🙏🙏🙏🙏🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
@leenjundi3811 Жыл бұрын
bro ily
@nathancruz8370 Жыл бұрын
Just take my tuition
@razasyed5752 жыл бұрын
respectable
@JelishaJoshua5 ай бұрын
how did you get the negative -109.7?
@rosiaamedommesulemana55802 жыл бұрын
thank you always..someday we get to see your face
@kaansaroz80863 жыл бұрын
bro you are amazing but you just need a better microphone
@jaxoncraig28883 жыл бұрын
I didn’t realize that guy from NCIS had a chemistry term named after him 😂
@edutalib2902 жыл бұрын
Thanks for nice lecture. You explained well. Can you please explain "why water boils at 100°C?
@advantphoenix78922 жыл бұрын
That’s just how the Celsius system works. At 0 degrees Celsius, water freezes
@jimberlygridder1832 жыл бұрын
@@advantphoenix7892 no one can explain.anything. They have merely observed repeated phenomenon.
@kathwren2109 Жыл бұрын
100C is when the intermolecular bonds of liquid water are torn by the movement of the thermal energy causing particularly to fly away now no longer attached to the main water mass, now it’s a gas!
@_timelapmaker_97552 жыл бұрын
i think you'll find for the starting question that the answer is E. None of the above is false - since D. is false.
@sds38412 жыл бұрын
If u have an endothermic reaction (delta H is positive) like H2 + I2 --> 2HI can you say whether the entropy rises or decreases and whether the reaction could be spontaneous?
@byebrows96982 жыл бұрын
Assuming the reaction is endothermic in the forward direction, the system requires work. Hence, the reaction is non-spontaneous meaning the Entropy of the universe is negative. If you watch this video, you will see the answers for yourself: kzbin.info/www/bejne/on-ZZ3lvi5xglbM
@alfredjackson1620 Жыл бұрын
Can anyone explain for a combustion reaction where ΔSsystem is positive and ΔH is negative, even though I know the reaction will always be spontaneous, how do I determine if lowering the temperature makes it more or less spontaneous? If ΔG=ΔH-TΔS then lowering the temperature would make ΔG less negative and less spontaneous but since ΔS surroundings=-ΔH/T approaches infinity as temperature decreases then the entropy of the universe contradicts this and implies that lowering the temperature makes the reaction more spontaneous. So if I wanted to know if lowering the temperature makes the reaction more or less spontaneous which do I look at, ΔG or ΔS of the universe. Why are they contradicting each other?
@lionherndlhofer40739 ай бұрын
One question if someone might be able to help: I came across the terms "desolvation penalty" and "rigidization penalty" in binding events which were both labelled as entropic penalties. The second I understand, as rigidization decreases the number of microstates of the system. But how does dehydration present a positive entropy term? Shouldn't the release of water in the system be a favoured entropic event, by allowing for more degrees of freedome as compared to water being forced in an order manner around an undefined molecular surface? Would be glad if someone could help out. All the best!
@marcusjohnson2718 Жыл бұрын
On the third problem, on the dealta S reaction, why were the reactants minus each other to get 20 J/mol?
@GilgameshhАй бұрын
at 22:48 u make a mistake. If you increase the free energy the reaction goes towards the reactants. Since a reaction is spontanous if delta G is negative, the free energy has to be decreased for the reaction to go to the right. The answer is D.
@futuredentist-xk3df4 ай бұрын
44:44 dammm
@autonation3767 Жыл бұрын
Can anyone tell me which reference tables are used to get enthalpy and entropy of the reactants and products pls pls
@bobernhardsson53453 жыл бұрын
In the first question you actually also have that "E" is a false statement :-)
@devyndevyndevyn2 жыл бұрын
thank u
@jiinjung14453 жыл бұрын
How could we assume that Kp equals to Kc with the question number 9?
@lina39956 ай бұрын
40:56
@sallyo3848 ай бұрын
this isn't fair.... I am only a mere child.... ::(((((( I cannot stand this
@kojicuxt3 ай бұрын
lmaoo how did your exam go? i hope you got a great result my fellow stem child
@kamilavazquez103510 күн бұрын
Realest thing ive heard all week
@RexKing-lc1tf8 күн бұрын
We must rebel
@saboismail38253 жыл бұрын
Can I see the picture of the tutor
@ulahalabalabilohuhu2 жыл бұрын
The way he says Joules reminds me of Jules in Euphoria
@niloufar90983 жыл бұрын
you are amazing :))))
@brithanygarcia9095 Жыл бұрын
On problem 10 why did you do R is 8.314. I thought R was 4.184???
@waffleface594011 ай бұрын
Nope 8.314
@josecastro57952 жыл бұрын
MVP
@gourabkumar83503 жыл бұрын
The answer of 5 no question is 24 not -36. please check it.
@axelmouaffo73183 жыл бұрын
those gibbs value are for the reaction not the compounds. As a result, once the equations are rearranged instead of subtracting products and reactants (which i am guessing u did) to obtain the gibbs value for the final equation you need to just add those two earlier reactions.
@Esraa.213 жыл бұрын
from where we get the 298 ?
@zememerr23292 жыл бұрын
To convert to Kelvin, add 273 (technically 273.15 but the extra decimals tend to be negligible) to your Celsius temperature. 298 Kelvin is a very common temperature in chemistry, it’s the standard temperature value (that or 25° Celsius, they’re the same thing)
@yuri_black_zero3 жыл бұрын
Lucky you
@nolanbuckman56136 ай бұрын
Organic Chem tutor>>>3 weeks of useless lectures
@jade_163 жыл бұрын
wait where did he get 273? at the part of the 25-degree celsius?
@갱갱항상3 жыл бұрын
what are you talking about? what's the time stamp? are you talking about when he found the boiling point of bromine? he subtracted 273 degrees K in order to get the temperature in C
@MorningOnMars3 жыл бұрын
273.15 K is used in dimensional analysis to move between temperature units Kelvin, Celsius, and Fahrenheit, eg: 15 °C can be converted to K by (15+273.15) = 288.15 K.
@stannygtech65373 жыл бұрын
Hey
@christopherscottgutierrez3323 Жыл бұрын
languages of the same thing, pretty cool to learn if ever working with someone or gentile that talks in different meausment languages, im more of ev to mole, see ya