as much as I give the dude props for going into superdimensional without using a rank-up card, WHY do gishki players always overextend -___-
@PagingDoctorGuy11 жыл бұрын
I've seen it with arsenal force or whatever that one that does 2 ranks up. *edit* astral force was the one I'm thinking of
@evilweasel790010 жыл бұрын
3 zielgigas would have won him the game, but he felt the need to summon a terrible xyz. Stupidity at its best. And azneyes and his tagpartner suck as well.
@altalt367911 жыл бұрын
so that's what pendulum summoning is .. When you summon invisible monsters
@ETHEbest11 жыл бұрын
SPECIAL SUMMON, SPECIAL SUMMON, SPECIAL SUMMON!
@PagingDoctorGuy11 жыл бұрын
is really normal summons
@TheGamingEevee11 жыл бұрын
Ryan Filip Too many decks that plays for you, like Evilswarm, madolche, battlin boxer etc. But madolche is the most unfair deck atm, given you get good card design.dek with tiaramisu and angelly is so good protecting your hootcake...hootcake is basically free 2 cards, ticket is free cards, tiaramisu's eff is free cards. Unfair advantage? Yes.
@PagingDoctorGuy11 жыл бұрын
***** YGO has been pretty much all about playing autopilot meta since inzektors.
@ericdravenashecorven11 жыл бұрын
Since you were asking about Gem Knights and their types, they're like the opposite of E-Heroes. Whereas E-Heroes are all warriors and their fusions rely on different attributes for their fusions, Gem Knights are for the most part earth and their fusions require different types.
@thefirepolo2511 жыл бұрын
what is the name of the song at 8:45? The song when the difference from your life points and your opponent's are really big?
@ericdravenashecorven11 жыл бұрын
Also, Vanity's will not destroy itself if you use an XYZ material. The card says "sent from the field or the deck to your graveyard," and since materials are not considered on the field it'll remain on the field.
@snowfox0recozay11 жыл бұрын
Got to say every time i see you play that Madolche deck I just love it. xD
@oblivionslefthand11 жыл бұрын
I was about to say I have a non-archetypal deck, but then I remembered that "Number" is an archetype, and all but 3 cards in my extra deck are Numbers (because Number Wall kills some decks). Other than that I run Mandragora and Exiton Knight, which are both part of the Evilswarm Archetype, but that's it. And if you were going to enforce a ban on archetypes, how exactly would you do that? Can't use any card from an archetype? There goes almost all the Xyz. Can only use one named card of any single archetype? There goes every support card ever made for an archetype. I'm sure there's a balance you could come up with somewhere, but it'd take a lot of testing and a lot of workaround, and I'm pretty sure a lot of people would be upset by it, considering MOST decks are archetypal. Like I said, even my deck that at first glance seems non-archetypal runs 15 Number/support cards in it.
@thefirepolo2511 жыл бұрын
what is the name of the music at 8:45 plz reply.
@lBakhainl11 жыл бұрын
Why the hell people don't know they can use the Reborn Redox's effect to Special Summon itself?
@teamragegruntjosh71011 жыл бұрын
Tributing for rituals happens during resolving of the ritual spell, so it is not a cost.
@BeybladeGenius10110 жыл бұрын
Idea if you've not done so before: do a combination deck based on card lores, for example, Gishkis and Lavals
@BozzLightyr11 жыл бұрын
"That's such a bad opening move" "Turn one 5000 beater that can blow up all the back row without a response, that's pretty good" lel o u
@captainabrhamlincoln11 жыл бұрын
"You can't respond to it, which is.. kind of stupid" Uh. 3 level 10 monsters. That is my response. Megatron is totally reasonable
@NutHouseReject11 жыл бұрын
can you make a video on how and where to download this program?
@MadMothz9 жыл бұрын
Cakes and pastries beating a Galaxy Destroyer xD
@fjlsfljsalfkjasdflka11 жыл бұрын
Wait wait wait Did azneyes just do math correctly?
@esseubot11 жыл бұрын
and that is why marshmalon and spirit reaper are good
@mr.masaru10 жыл бұрын
were do u play this at
@AsianDr4gon11 жыл бұрын
how do i send you one of my replays? kinda lost cause i have a really good duel with 2 interesting decks here
@yzer997511 жыл бұрын
Alternate video title: gem-knight player does nothing
@GrugGangGrugGang9 жыл бұрын
+Jon Foreman Alternative Alternate video title: Gem-Knight Player plays Gem-Knights.
@truehiro11 жыл бұрын
XYZ materials are not considered to be on the field so if devpro isn't broken, it should keep vanity's emptiness on field
@ArtistNotFound12311 жыл бұрын
you can argue that the gishki player had the most and best resources in the duel, but then completely squandered them all at the start leaving their partner with pretty much no options, and B.) wasted their mst on the d.d.r to kill the gem knight of all things when he/she had robo destroyer on the field of all things, leaving them no options to get over problem cards like skill drain, vanities emptiness, mistake, etc.
@UnlimeitedMK11 жыл бұрын
dn needs tag
@jasonhaley60049 жыл бұрын
And now there's a utopia ray like-xyz for madolches.
@miloszivkovic739110 жыл бұрын
what is this game ?
@809munker1311 жыл бұрын
More tag team this is great!
@Altinore11 жыл бұрын
you know azneyes if you would have let him banish maxx c he would have been able to xyz with one of the level 4 he had to banish instead of maxx c and then he would have xyz'd into ark absorbed robo leaving you with 2 cards to be able to use for hoot cakes effect
@Hydroark11 жыл бұрын
Y u no cowboy 4 game
@bcdfezz11 жыл бұрын
22:40 He could have summoned a 1700 lvl 4, then cowboyed for game if he had cowboy
@kurisu200311 жыл бұрын
Vanity's Emptiness made the Gishki player cry because they couldn't special summon anymore lmao
@zachsuedmeyer252611 жыл бұрын
So this title is wrong, Madolche Vs Gishki Blue-eyes
@CorsairJoshua11 жыл бұрын
How does Azn-Eyes always get matched up against scrubs!?
@jugemujugemugokounosurinantoka11 жыл бұрын
I facepalmed so badly at the Gishki player..... there was no reason to go off all in on the first turn. I would've understood if he had backrow (which Gishkis sometimes don't play) but all he did was go into Galaxy destroyer...
@natesmith687110 жыл бұрын
To answer your question why an aqua is an EARTH attribute, Gem-knights are based on precious stones that come from the Earth's surface IMO. Also, there's a FIRE attribute Aqua (or is it WATER pyro? cant remember), so fuck it.
@samisaab920710 жыл бұрын
Dude, gem knights are amazing. I use them all the time and win a lot. Even pulled off a lot of OTKs (lost count, as a matter of fact). However, they're terrible if you use them poorly. You need creativity in this deck otherwise it sucks. Clearly this guy didn't have anything special so it was sucking here but the point is, gem knights are not to be underestimated.
@DunCakes9 жыл бұрын
i question why the Gem-Knight player was running Redox, and I agree, i love Gem-Knights
@DarkFireBlade259 жыл бұрын
Sami Saab Might need an example decklist cuz I can't, for the life of me, figure out a good build.
@samisaab92079 жыл бұрын
***** I stopped playing a long time ago and when I checked the deck out to give you the recipe, I noticed that my deck was no longer viable... The new bans and limits really hit my deck hard
@samisaab92079 жыл бұрын
***** Well anyway here's my old deck: imgur.com/vnaT7Jb&PHwnq5f and my new untested deck: imgur.com/vnaT7Jb&PHwnq5f#1 (Never used imgur before, let me know if the links work)
@DarkFireBlade259 жыл бұрын
Awesome thanks! This is pretty helpful in building one.
@UngaVonBunga11 жыл бұрын
Can someone explain how to use and how vanity emptiness works cause im using it in bujin for the first time
@ParryDox11 жыл бұрын
Step 1: Make your specials/plays and set Vanity. Step 2: Wait for your opponent to use a special summoning effect that has a negative cost, for example D.D.R. Step 3:Laugh that you stopped a play. Step 4: Protect your monster so that Vanity does not destroy itself. Vanity does have it's weakness, but Bujin's can manage around it's destruction effect because it does not include discarding in it's condition.
@UngaVonBunga11 жыл бұрын
I have a scenerio my oppenent plays tempress of prochecy puts spellbook of power on it then activate its effect to get high preitess or world of prohecy i chain vanity so he doesnt play anything will it work in my favor or fail
@UngaVonBunga11 жыл бұрын
And thanks for the info
@ParryDox11 жыл бұрын
IIRC Tempress would start a chain, so it would be tributed and High Priestess would not be summoned. I don't know for sure because I haven't faced the deck in a long time.
@UngaVonBunga11 жыл бұрын
Yess i knew it not in depth but i knew i could have
@kauagr110 жыл бұрын
what website can u tag duel?
@TheDannyPhantomhive9 жыл бұрын
It's a program if no one told you by now called DevPro...
@Thepokedek7 жыл бұрын
you can do it on dueling nexus as well, you dont have to download anything just go and play
@faymiku769311 жыл бұрын
The Gishki player wasn't terribly competitive if he's running Galaxy Destroyer...
@liamgray532411 жыл бұрын
but it was awesome :D
@cheesewhiz800811 жыл бұрын
why was he like "ayzn, tell me what to do!" why even play the game lol
@theangryatheistskepticfemi604110 жыл бұрын
Madolches and Gem-Knights? Um... I suppose that could work.
@ParanoiaGentlman11 жыл бұрын
i dont like keeping the abyss on the field so i tribue it with soul ogre to make 10 for zielgigas
@bcdfezz11 жыл бұрын
So I was debating making a gem-knight deck...
@raipanda13311 жыл бұрын
Why do Gem-Knight players use the gemini's? The deck works better without them and Redox...
@zenmodeman11 жыл бұрын
I've been testing an unorthodox version of gem-knights that uses he feminist but no redox. I play gem-knight crystal although it is not very good because how I play tennis deck is to focus on opening 1 gem-knight fusion. And 5 monsters. I play 2 gem-knight fusion and 3 upstarts as my only spels because I want to open a majority of monsters. I playn3 turtle since you can fusion the rock guy if you already have gem-knight fusion. Playing 3 upstarts with 2 fusions is almost the same as playing 3 fusions. It's a difference between like 2 percent so that's not a big deal and it insures Icant have more than 2 spells in hand. I use the feminist as extra fodder and I max out on all the cards that can regain me advantage like volcanic shell, obsidian, and laquari. It's completely different from most builds but it works incredibly though cards,like necrovalley mean I lose.
@raipanda13311 жыл бұрын
Well, Gem-Knights have always had a problem with Necro no matter what the build, they are very graveyard oriented. But I play an aggressive build that doesn't let me lose advantage, and i only run three garnet and three tourmaline, but i main deck Veiler and Lyla because I have one Seraphinite, that i've actually gone into several times.It's trap heavy, and meant to win game 1, which it can do most of the time.
@zenmodeman11 жыл бұрын
My build is the opposite. It plays no backrow and relies on gem-knight fusion to go off. Without it I can't do much but I also designed it so that I will almost always have enough monsters to go for big plays If I open fusion. The only 2 cards in my deck that I can't use gem-knight fusion with are snipe hunter and rescue rabbit. I believe the aqua Gemini is vital to my deck because it allows me to go into amethyst. I've only otked with aquamarine once but I still want to have the option to otk if my opponent has backrow. My deck can easily get 4 gem-knights since I don't have to worry about opening gem-knight fusion and a bunch of spells. Maybe we should exchange decklists and try out each others decks. Mine: 3x: garnet,tourmaline,armadallo,turtle,obsidian,lazuli,aqua gemini gem-knight,alexandrite,volcanic shell,upstart 2x: gem-knight fusion,crystal,pyro gemini gem-knight, amber, 1x: rabbit, snipe hnter
@chrismegusta10 жыл бұрын
azneyes, maining emptiness before it was cool
@MoonlightDusk11 жыл бұрын
lol that first turn
@EpicJames6911 жыл бұрын
Lol i was playing a silly blue eyes shining dragon deck
@tugkanbuyukturan11 жыл бұрын
İ was summon robo with hieratics but when i was do that redm was at 3
@yCantiLogOn11 жыл бұрын
The partner is so bad
@minor73649 жыл бұрын
18:33 well said
@Netheraxe11 жыл бұрын
Rituals and fusions are not cost-based summons.
@Altinore11 жыл бұрын
By the nature of the game, Yes, they are. normally to ritual or fusion summon you would need a spell as well as a cost of one or more monsters for one monster. Making the equation to summon these monsters 1 (S) + 1+ (M's) = 1 R/F (at least 2 for 1) They aren't cost-based if one were to play a card like miracle fusion which pulls its resources from the graveyard. It could also be argued that it is not cost based if one were to be playing a deck which is able to use its graveyard as a resource as well (Like Dragon Rulers) or other such cards that have an ability once in the graveyard.
@Coinman12111 жыл бұрын
Altinore He's referring to how the game treats them. When sending materials for a fusion or tributes for a ritual those cards sent are not considered a card's "Cost"; any cards sent are by the "effect" of the fusion/ritual card.
@Altinore11 жыл бұрын
OHHH see, i was wrong then, sorry guys.
@wynaughtify11 жыл бұрын
Some gem-knight players are really pro, some are nostalgic, and some others got wrecked one day by a pro gem-knight player :
@airtempest89459 жыл бұрын
The highest normal summon you can make is giant kozaky with 2500 atk
@Sp0okeh11 жыл бұрын
the duel talk made me laff XD
@ParanoiaGentlman11 жыл бұрын
use noellia speeds up the deck so much and 3 meditaion and cycle.
@SilencerXLR810 жыл бұрын
Dat first turn doe
@vnswitness97409 жыл бұрын
The strongest level 4 monster is giant kozaky with 2500/2400
@kanamekyuzo530711 жыл бұрын
You misplay 2 times 1-) messenger and hotcake your hand this is wrong because messenger death. Draw I mesn always put back messenger 2-) angelly effect-> hotcake or cat special summon hotcake your hand summon number 11 effect giga brilant boost monster and you use Queen effect back to card your oppnent card
@yaboijdg63128 жыл бұрын
messengellato* hootcake* mewfeuille*
@MissdaisyQuenn11 жыл бұрын
Azn!!!! Look up this! soul-absorbing bone tower otk most trolly deck of all xD
@jojo-pi9ni10 жыл бұрын
That was one Garbo gem knight deck if he had a lolite
@Aarolei11 жыл бұрын
Hey, don't dis on Gem-Knights so hard in tag duels, they are super awesome partners to have if the player is decent.
@christopherbraben80611 жыл бұрын
that gen knight player so unlucky, getting stuck with a scrub who doesn't know the rules
@blackking87111 жыл бұрын
Gem- Knights are so fun, he would have been able to get over that Robo if first turn Zirconia and ruby, then ruby eff. Ruby now at 5400 lol
@neocyndaquil11 жыл бұрын
its best to keep messengelato inside deck btw.
@ParanoiaGentlman11 жыл бұрын
i would of rather kept the zielgigas than the robo.
@bilipino7611 жыл бұрын
Could of went angelly into angelly. Angelly can't be destroyed and leaves fodder for next turn.
@TheGameChanger1511 жыл бұрын
giant kozaky 2500 but you need kozaky
@aswjimmypruitt11 жыл бұрын
a level 4, normal summonable monster with 2500 atk, Giant Kozaky :) though it would just die lol
@zisisz157211 жыл бұрын
One time i was vs gishki and i had e herous and i had my thunder king on bord and macro and my opponent could do anything LOL he dark hole me and then i lanced so good and preaty much i won caus he could NOT DO ANYTHING except set.
@markedfang11 жыл бұрын
giant kozaky :D 2.5k attack.
@TobiVasquez399 жыл бұрын
Well hey, if your terribad partner didn't "waste" d.d then the opponent wouldnt have for some reason played Mst, and therefore you wouldnt have your field or possibly madolche ticket. GG Advanced tactics you cant understand
@jamestheskahunter191910 жыл бұрын
dont be pretentious. theres no glory in getting popular from insulting other players!
@fuknames212311 жыл бұрын
your partner was so bad, he could have made any rank 4 had he banished maxx c.
@GhostEmblem11 жыл бұрын
yeah, but he told him not to banish his maxx c
@GhostEmblem11 жыл бұрын
***** well yes, if he summoned armadillo and added then did the exact same play from there but that assumes he even had xyz in a fusion deck anyway the issue was that Mr. jenkins didnt know why he didnt banish maxx c
@Turbotundra11 жыл бұрын
Azneyes pls stop assuming that your partner is stupid and repeating everything you type.
@lovetownsend11 жыл бұрын
opening hand 3 boss monsters to make.... galaxy destroyer with 1 card in hand left -_- WWWHHYY you can just make a lv.10 deck and have 4 cards left in hand.
@asfafafasfas870411 жыл бұрын
Azn eyes, why're you so beautiful?
@HiddenAngelLionHeart11 жыл бұрын
Dude...U say ur bad at the game, and yet you duel like a boss always. So how dies that even make sense??? Lol P.S. I HATE Ojamas With a Strong Burning Passion!
@DEFjunior2611 жыл бұрын
ironic Azneyes is paired with bad players. Even so, that MST vs DDR is so bad lol
@MithDragon11 жыл бұрын
devpro is nice but way too many casuals. A lot of players are bad on devpro. poor azneyes
@JordanFreshTillDeath11 жыл бұрын
Devpro seems to have a lot of bad players on it lol.
@TheKillo1311 жыл бұрын
Your bad but they make you look good
@charliekip598411 жыл бұрын
Azneyes ur ondevpro, their all bad
@StudTheNew11 жыл бұрын
i would play dragons if we weren't allowed to play archetypes but honestly i could care less about those whine babies who can't beat archetypical decks TT-TT
@shawnlarkin937311 жыл бұрын
gg
@ETHEbest11 жыл бұрын
last
@TheNewMaxico11 жыл бұрын
This new kind of yugioh makes me sick. It startet to suck at the beginning of zexal, that brought the xyzs
@ViolentJactations11 жыл бұрын
you were playing with the most unfunny cringe-inducing people
@blackking87111 жыл бұрын
Gem- Knights are so fun, he would have been able to get over that Robo if first turn Zirconia and ruby, then ruby eff. Ruby now at 5400 lol