Glock Generation 6 - Your thoughts?

Apparently you can see the poll (public) but Patreon requires you to login to take it. I didn't know this at the time. Darn it, sorry folks.
GO HERE TO VOTE IN THE GLOCK POLL: / glock-generation-46762990
MAC Website & PrimaryArms website link: www.militaryarm...
SubscribeStar: www.subscribes...
MAC T-Shirt Store: ballisticink.c...
MAC Amazon Store: www.amazon.com...
USCCA Insurance: www.usccapartne...
Add me on Parler! parler.com/pro...
Challenge Targets Discount Code: MAC556 (www.challenget...)
Glock will eventually release the Generation 6 gun. The Generation 5 Glock saw over 20 changes from the previous model but externally it seems very little has really changed. Will the Glock Gen 6 drastically change the gun or will it be more of the same?
OpticsPlanet Discount Code: MAC556
Modern Gun School: www.mgs.edu
IMPORTANT: All shooting is done on a state approved firing range and under the supervision of trained professionals. Our videos are produced in a safe environment by highly trained professionals with decades of experience. We are Federally licensed and are compliant with all Federal and State laws. Do not attempt to replicate the actions featured in our videos without the proper training, licensing and without medical professionals present.
We are not attempting to sell you the items featured in this video. We are not instructing our viewers on how to modify firearms, accessories or otherwise change their basic legal function. All firearms and accessories are legal products commonly available in stores all across the United States. Our videos are for entertainment purposes only.
The USCCA is not an insurance company. A policy has been issued to the USCCA by Universal Fire and Casualty Insurance Company. That policy provides the association and its members with self-defense liability insurance, subject to its terms, conditions, limitations, and exclusions.
#glock #9mm #generation6

[@ReeveHelalV]

Rumor has it that the Gen 6 will have polygonal rifling for increased accuracy, finger grooves for better ergonomics, and a slightly different black finish for increased corrosion protection. It will retain the polymer sights.

[@thesmallestminorityisthein4045]

And thats why I love aftermarket frames and slides. Glock just doesnt get it.

[@brahtrumpwonbigly7309]

I'll believe it when I see it, sounds too innovative for them.

[@Broman-es4sx]

That's hilarious

[@googlechicken]

Cool so all you will have to do is change the sights ,the grips put a new trigger in and 600 dollars later on top of the 650 you paid for the stock pistol you get a pretty nice gun or you could just spend 5-6 hundred on an xdm elite , or CZ p10 or a Steyr M9 A2 or FN 509 tactical with way more features, better quality, fit and finish and just as reliable for half the dough

[@purrmitivo288]

I'll stick to making my own firearms lmfao

[@ArcticFox1776]

*glock engineers* “alright boys let’s add some stippling put back on the finger grooves and call it gen 6 and we’ll chalk that up as a win”.

[@michaelkling2994]

Glock truly exemplifies the notion: “If it aint broke, don’t fix it..”

[@rohawaha]

And , If it's an ugly Pig , Don't put lipstick on it !

[@LuvBorderCollies]

Years of tradition, unhampered by progress.

[@tomclark4880]

Michael if that were true, companies like zev wouldn't exist.

[@blckandwhtknight]

More like henry ford... You can have any gun you want, as long is it's the same garbage we've been making for 40 years

[@vladimirlopez7840]

@@blckandwhtknight garbage that works and has been working for a long time now.

[@coborobasky2080]

"I'm not fucking leaving" -Stock glock trigger

[@Christmasdeath]

Best comment ever

[@tt81k]

Winning comment across all Glock forums everywhere!

[@deltatango7759]

There are no bad triggers just bad shooters :(

[@preparedmindstrongspirit5724]

@@deltatango7759 shoot a vp70z and then tell me that.

[@Saywhatiwannafuckit]

🤣😅😂🤣😅 savage

[@stewmeat9261]

gen 6 Glock: we removed the back strap and reintroduced the finger grooves.

[@nasirjones-bey5852]

😂😂😂😂

[@Blingem14]

LOL!!!!

[@S.A.Masquerade]

Hahahaha

[@jetnam7580]

🤣 was about to say the same thing..

[@lucasc3775]

I'm in lol

[@everythingdefensivecarry1108]

I’ve used and carried the Glock pistol for 30 plus years, and here are my thoughts; I like it the way it is. I don’t see why they should change anything. They have their base customers, and new customers are attracted by their reputation based on their proven history. Changing the trigger guard would make it not fit the multiple holsters that Glock users have accrued over the years. Kind of like the 1911. You either like them or you don’t. Those who cling to them do so because of history and familiarity. I say let Sig be Sig, and Glock be Glock, and others do there thing too!

[@patriotplays6990]

Totally see where your coming from my man, But I would propose a solution, how about keeping gen 6 pretty much the same with some nice quiet upgrades, but then also throwing some R and D money at a totally new very modern pistol. I would to see what Glock would come up with if given a clean chalkboard.

[@everythingdefensivecarry1108]

@@anthonyarcher7268 Why would they have me right where they want me when I don’t even own a Glock any longer? Don’t be stupid.

[@everythingdefensivecarry1108]

@@anthonyarcher7268 just stop. Liking a product the way it is, and seeing no need to change anything does not lock you in to trap with that product, especially when there are so many products that are perfectly usable as is.

[@everythingdefensivecarry1108]

@@anthonyarcher7268 It’s not the gun, it’s what you can do with it.

[@lietch62]

My thoughts aswell. I’ve been carrying the same gen 3 19 for 10 years. I still carry it every day bone stock. All I’ve done is black out the rear sight and slightly sand down the finger grooves. If you don’t Glocks then don’t buy a Glock!

[@HHenry-tt1of]

I can't wait until the Gen 7 when they add the finger grooves back for ergonomics.

[@YorktownUSA]

So innovative, but wait... isn't it already perfect?

[@rhubarbpie2027]

And a two slot dust cover rail that is 10% farther apart than 1913 rail specs to allow for flush mounting of some weird proprietary light which runs off of CR2 camera batteries which emits 973 lumens, because 1,000 lumens is too mainstream.

[@chinesesparrows]

Cant wait for Glock gen z that identifies as an butterfly

[@sichtbarfurallenutzer4421]

@@chinesesparrows Best comment I saw so far good Sir.

[@stevenk5800]

@Larry yeah, they hate Glock so much, when a Glock video gets uploaded. They flock to it like hippies to a farmers market!!! I like a lot of firearms manufactures. Including Glock.the only thing worse than a Glock fanboy, is a Glock hater!

[@tsuhobbs]

Gen 6 Glock: Revolutionary finger grooves on the grip. Polygonal barrel for improved accuracy. OD green. LOL

[@Jedi391]

I could never get into Glock until the Gen 5. It was the first one to work for me and now I love it……the changes were enough to make a difference. The accuracy claims in the Gen 5 aren’t dubious, they’re demonstrable.

[@ZhuJo99]

So I went to that poll, Tim. There is one option missing: “Glock will introduce nothing new, nothing to see here”.

[@mattdg1981]

There is sooo much wrong with your comment. I'm sure Gaston is building a new g44 that holds 11 rds.

[@ZhuJo99]

@@mattdg1981 Gaston is dead long time ago. So yeah, maybe he is building it. But it will be available only for those on another shore ;)

[@linus2982]

@@ZhuJo99Gaston isnt dead?

[@mrpibb7781]

Gen 6 Glock: Takes Glock mags

[@brandon1910]

I gave up on glock a long time ago (hated the trigger). Went to a S&W M&P and never looked back.

[@seanbrady6474]

broke ass lmao

[@GndmMkv]

popular feature glock must add to gen 6: full auto sear

[@capncrunch1733]

Got em

[@LuvBorderCollies]

Ammo?

[@JoshBenware]

Glock 18 already did that

[@Smartmovesstayingahead]

They better for real I agree a lot with you on that

[@taylorbrown3336]

Gaston Glock is a genius. He has a net worth of over $2 Billion from selling pretty much the same old design for the past 40 years 😂

[@yogibaer7926]

Never change a running system

[@s1mo-RBC]

Well he did create the most reliable pistol in history. Polymer striker fired pistols are half the market at least and every single one borrows from Glock.

[@LuvBorderCollies]

Gaston has gotten a lot of mileage from that same pack of kool-aid.

[@citizenoftheninthdivision]

@@s1mo-RBC hahahahahahaha "most reliable pistol in history" hahahahahahaha

[@natecollins9331]

there is a difference between guns and the stuff that people use everyday in their daily life hahaha ....

[@jimmyglea]

The brick hasn’t changed in a few thousand years and is still being used today by the millions. Why fix what ain’t broke?

[@LuvBorderCollies]

Ummmm, there's a LOT more building materials today than brick 400 years ago.

[@jimmyglea]

@@LuvBorderCollies Yup...and the lowly brick is still one of them.

[@MrMagnaniman]

I agree. I use a claymore for home defense and carry a small axe with a stone head and bone handle, bound with sinew.

[@fitchboi80]

Not change but maybe add a model outside there normal comfort zone

[@User-nu6km]

Women have changed a lot in that period

[@TRIIGGAVELLI]

Shit....feels like the Gen 5 was just released. Time's moving

[@ClickClack_Bam]

I know. We just switched to it at my Dept.

[@MoistNuggeteer]

We for real just be out here getting older every minute.

[@TRIIGGAVELLI]

@@MoistNuggeteer It appears so.

[@delta3two]

Just blink your eyes....another day has gone by.

[@Sicpuede]

Time is not moving fast, glock is .

[@nathandively8524]

there are going to be as many glock gens as "NOW" music CD's or Albums. some of you that grew up in the 90's may get this

[@evilkidd174]

How dare you remind me of those dark days.

[@cincinnatifunk]

Pure Funk

[@Datsyukiandeke]

Now thats what i call Glock volume 179

[@LuvBorderCollies]

Another Glock. That's as exciting as Cher announcing another Farewell Tour.

[@productofthe80s]

I love how *GLOCK* stands by the "If it ain't broke don't fix it" motto

[@FierceMouse]

@American Heretic - *standard capacity* magazines

[@guyfox1206]

Agreed, beats the hell out of the Governments policy of "if it ain't broke fix it till it is".

[@dennyadkins21]

Glock is perfect after you change everything lol. I dont have any of them anymore. Like shooting a brick

[@Username-ld7ho]

Their motto is literally “perfection”. They should live by that claim.

[@slappymcface5681]

Except for all the after market fixes right? I mean, saying a Glock is the greatest gun ever made is the same as saying the Honda Civic is the best vehicle ever made.

[@adamgrare8070]

Lol they're not going to do any of that, they're just going to add the finger grooves back

[@G19Jeeper]

“Ribbed for your pleasure”

[@c.decker8540]

Exactly

[@IncrediPaulAZ]

Lol and it'll be called "revolutionary"

[@dexm2010]

LMAO So true

[@alphazuluz]

Sooooo, this video should have been titled “We look back at all the Glock Generations”. Damn clickbait.

[@mmaviator22]

seriously. Dick move on their part. Literally shouldve been titled Generational History of Glock Pistols.

[@Eduardo_Espinoza]

ya the thumbnail was a shameless virus like Ad but the gen 6 will prolly be the same anyways

[@A_Son_Of_Yahuah]

More like "A Waste Of 19:43 Minutes"

[@12masterr]

I think glock and harley Davidson have the same ceo! Tjey always come out next year with a "new" model!

[@jackwicker]

I'd really like to see a beavertail on the frame without a backstrap, rtf2 texture as default, a redesigned and undercut triggerguard, and a factory flat trigger.

[@MrKjm444]

I agree - the beavertail options for the GEN5 are ok, but not that great; sort of a taped on addition vs. a design element. IF the foundation grip had a decent beavertail and a backstrap system for size adjustment I think that would be a better idea. (i.e. people with smaller hands don't need a beavertail?)

[@rrphantom8194]

I know the phrase goes "If it ain't broke, don't fix it", but holy shit glock

[@reachblowsdick7222]

Someone should have told Glock, "There's always room for improvement".

[@MarriedFucker]

@Peder Hansen tell that to SECRETARIAT. Doesn’t need to innovate cause they will NEVER catch what he did. Same with Glock

[@anonypersona3189]

Glock's attitude is both a blessing and a curse. If Glock changed the formula drastically every few years (like HK or Sig for instance), the Glock would not be the staple it is today. Aftermarket support is enormous for Glock simply because it hasn't changed and has stayed practically constant for so long... so long that other vendors have more than enough time to adopt and have little to no worries about a completely new model to adapt to. It's like the 1911, which btw also has a massive aftermarket support - for the same reasons. It has barely changed. Now, take any new and "innovative" gun that was recently released and recently discontinued for a newer and improved model - no aftermarket support.

[@nickrice4561]

@@MarriedFucker Except glock has been more than caught lol. The p-10 c is better than a glock in every way

[@noclass2gun342]

@@MarriedFucker except everyone has already passed glock... including people who make glocks that aren't glock. Only a glock fanboy thinks a glock is the pinnacle of firearms design... speaking of... Gaston left a little something white and creamy on your chin

[@Matt-tt4cu]

The army didn’t choose sig because it’s a better gun. They chose sig because the contract was 100+ million dollars cheaper.

[@dubdubberson]

It was also "modular" like the requirements asked for.

[@Matt-tt4cu]

@@dubdubberson the “modularity” had nothing to do with the decision considering they are only issuing 9mm ammunition. Read the Army’s statement after Glock and Steyr filed complaints with the GAO. “The best value in terms of its performance capability, the terms and conditions of the vendor’s proposal, and price.”

[@DChase-ky2pg]

Hey brother. I've been watching for about a year. Retired Navy guy here, working down at MARSOC now. One of our Marines, was talking about your channel one day, so gave it a try and love your content.

[@crazyguns3575]

Glock, the boyfriend who always says he’ll change himself but just don’t

[@crazyguns3575]

I think for the sixth gen there is not much they can do really, for example the 1911 so many modifications have been made, nowadays they’re trying to make them polymer or double barreled the design is beautiful but dead same goes for the glock now, I think it should come with a lighter trigger option out of the box so you don’t have to invest $200 more dollars for an aftermarket one

[@rickytovar226]

Haha

[@jasonl.6652]

He doesn’t need to change. We love the way he is. It’s called unconditional love. Like what love is supposed to be.

[@maximilianavdeev7363]

@@crazyguns3575 the gen 5 trigger is great out of the box. It’s as good as any 200 trigger you will buy for it.

[@crazyguns3575]

@@maximilianavdeev7363 when it comes down to 4lbs of pull compared to 6.5lbs that’s when I’d personally be happy

[@Shannon_Lacey]

15 rd mags for the 43x and 48, without having to go the Shield S15 route. And a higher capacity for the 43.

[@FreedomandBaconHomestead]

Everyone say it with me: metal sights!

[@type_s_tyler7547]

Yes!

[@fiathead]

I kind of like the plastic sights. Treat them as nothing more than dovetail protectors with enough markings to allow you to break the pistol in while the sights you really want are shipped.

[@brettkunkle5468]

Boom!

[@AlphaChimpEnergy]

Are you eligible for blue label glocks? If so, there is no better deal and they always come standard with night sights and 3mags for a sweetheart price! I think S&W has a similar program but I’ve never personally found a place that participated in their program. I’d love to get my dick beaters on one of their magpul collaboration rifles. But I need another gun like I need a 5th asshole!

[@Tula1940_LB]

I agree and I don't. You can already get Glocks with factory steel sights in several variants however most people have their own opinions on what sights are best. The polymer sights are usable out of the box and they add very little cost to the pistol because Glock knows most users are going to swap them anyway.

[@fuzzyreticle]

Makes you think if folks talked this way about Mauser rifles in the late 40s.

[@DanAllen117]

Don't get me wrong, I love classic firearms. However, you're actually proving a good point. While Mauser rifles are indeed great quality, in the 40's they were just heavily outdated by more superior firearms, simply due to advances in technology. It's almost the same here, except now, Glock has the ability to find information about what people want to see in their product in real time, yet they won't improve their products. Glock is still a great company that will likely be around for many years to come, but if they keep this up they'll end up falling behind in the next decade or so.

[@tedhodge4830]

@@DanAllen117 "More superior firearms" like what, exactly. Mauser 98 was easily the best bolt action design in the world even during the 40's. If you mean that it was outdated by merit of the fact that it was a bolt action in a world with submachine guns and semi automatic rifles, that would make perhaps more sense, but it still isn't a complete statement. Most of the armies in the world were still using bolt action rifles until the end of the war for their standard arm. Literally tens of millions of bolt action rifles were made during that period and it was easily the most common arm on the battlefield.

[@andrew2353]

The Mauser was outdated the second the Garand entered serial production.

[@ashleypalmer7983]

They did. There were millions of people who thought the M98 Mauser was the best rifle ever.

[@vaclav_fejt]

​@@tedhodge4830 Well...Gewehr 98 was rather old by then, with outdated features, Karabiner 98k had some pretty nasty habits (see Bloke on the Range), but it was *one* of the best bolt action systems, used by many states (including the US in the 1903). The main competitors on the field of quality were the Lee-Enfield system, Japanese Type 38, Swiss straight-pulls, French MAS-36 and maybe even some of the Italian stuff (Carcano TS: good enough system and most handy features).

[@jakefranklin6413]

A lot of complaining about grip angle. If you don’t like the grip angle then don’t buy it?

[@Whiskey11Gaming]

As a company who makes a product, wouldn't that be the problem though? If people "aren't" buying it? I mean, I don't know of a single company who sells a product that doesn't wish to expand their customer base... That's not to say Glock doesn't have a huge base at all... we aren't talking about a niche handgun at all, but still, maintaining a customer base is not as good as growing one. As someone who is currently carrying one as a duty handgun (G45, because fuck yes it's a great design), I used to hate on the grip angle a lot. Having shot mine a lot, I don't notice it anymore. I'm not sure it does "anything" aside form lock out the wrist, but comparing it to the M92A1 I carried before hand (which is an epic handgun no matter what former .mil say), there is functionally no difference in shooting beyond the slight mental retraining necessary to "compensate" for it.

[@DannyHerron]

bought one long ago about 20 yrs, hated it, have never owned another. Back then there wasn't many choices, now there are plenty and better.

[@howard7689]

I love 1911s with the original round mainspring housing, it's the ideal Glock grip angle.

[@Murphy82nd]

I'd rather the magazine release be reversible than be on both sides.

[@InvidiousIgnoramus]

But why?

[@Murphy82nd]

@@InvidiousIgnoramus because I’ve seen issues with magazines releases that function on both sides. They tend to be more susceptible to jamming from debris (per MAC’s own Gauntlet videos), if you have meaty hands sometimes they can be blocked from protruding from the other side, and there’s the concern that leaning up against something might inadvertently release the magazine.

[@leadsled213]

I had an ambi release Glock....a total failure they quickly abandoned.

[@robertn4840]

Exactly

[@InvidiousIgnoramus]

@@Murphy82nd Frankly, half of that is an issue regardless. I can't speak to it being more susceptible to debris, but those other things can still happen with a single side mag release.

[@XxxAtlantaxxX]

Fast forward ⏩ to 14:45 Thank me later.

[@JG-jg9zz]

Thx! Saved me a crap ton of time!

[@PracticalTacticalSheepDog]

This entire video was a waste of my life.

[@jayroker36]

It is 14 minutes later....thanks

[@Rostislav.113-27]

Спасибо

[@xxfire07]

Thank a lot. You sir, saved me 14:00 minutes of my life.

[@straighttothepoint3477]

Ive seen so many reviews about the glock 19 gen 5, from experienced marksmen, like "TheHumbleMarksman" and "TrexArms" both of which said they liked the stock trigger. and youre the first person on KZbin, ive heard to say the trigger isnt good. While im sure it could be better, i dont think its bad at all

[@lieutenantcoloneltanyavond8273]

I suggest you shoot something other than Glock then.

[@joel553009]

@@lieutenantcoloneltanyavond8273 if you shoot only glocks you know that gen 5 is better than previous triggers

[@philipfreeman2863]

It just might be my perception but the trigger on my glock gen3 seens to break a little cleaner and lighter than my gen4 glock19. But both are useable. And both shoot extremely well.

[@rodanvssct]

It just needs a little more cow bell.

[@henrywes2628]

If the magazine release was oversized and ambi, it seems like you would accidentally drop the magazine when shooting. Have seen left handers shoot right handed handguns and accidentally drop the mag a little and thought it was a jam/feed issue.

[@antipeta3]

Agreed 👍

[@LuvBorderCollies]

@FireEscape How I remember hour after hour of "Rip and Strip" with Gen 2 non-dropfree mags.

[@stevestinnett6777]

Don’t worry about suggestions, Glock won’t listen

[@Paladin1873]

You mean like Colt? For how many decades did they ignore any upgrades?

[@Eduardo_Espinoza]

@@Paladin1873 if you mean the 1911 that is not the only gun they sell so really you have a lot of options of the 1911 & 1911 like guns

[@Paladin1873]

@@Eduardo_Espinoza Those options came very late in production around the 1990s, long after better guns were being built by competitors. I came of age during a time when good gunsmiths were required to turn any 1911 into a true combat pistol. Colt refused to make these improvements to their 1911 pistol or provide enhancements to it for the first 80 years or more of its production run. They were very late to the game. During this period they didn't even bother to modify the feed ramps and chambers to reliably feed anything other 230 grain FMJ. The same can be said of their entire lineup of firearms. Improvements to their revolvers came slowly and never matched what S&W was doing. They dropped their entire DA revolver line for two decades before bringing some names back a couple of years ago. Thankfully, they upgraded and simplified the lock work to make the guns stronger and more durable. Their SAA was dropped in 1941 and not restored until the late 1950s, then dropped again between 1974-75 before resuming once more. It remains virtually unchanged from the 1873 design, meaning it is still not safe to carry with six rounds in it. Ruger fixed that problem nearly a half century ago.

[@Eduardo_Espinoza]

@@Paladin1873 but what about the A1 updated to the A2 1911 within 80 years also there are many 1900's pistols before they landed on the 1911. colt made Russian variants, mexican variants, they had different configurations & unique calibers.

[@Paladin1873]

@@Eduardo_Espinoza You are equating markings and very subtle cosmetic changes to actual design improvements. Changing calibers is not an improvement to the design. One might argue the Commander, introduced in 1949, was the first major change Colt made to the 1911, in that it had a shortened slide and barrel and an aluminum frame, but that was it. Colt did not improve the extractor design, the link system, the safety, or the sights. The series 70 introduced the spring loaded collet bushing with its tendency to break at the most inopportune monument. This was followed by the Series 80, with its gritty trigger pull, courtesy of the firing pin block safety. By comparison, innovative gunsmiths have been tinkering with Colts since the first ones entered the civilian market prior to America's entry into WWI. It was gunsmith who created the shorter configurations, longer configurations, lowered ejection ports, relieved trigger guards, improved combat sights, ambidextrous safeties, better triggers, faster lock times, more accurate barrels and bushings, etc. This cottage industry eventually beget several high end custom manufacturers, while other established gun companies and importers joined in making their own versions of the 1911, some being nearly exact copies of the Colt, and others containing more advance features. Colt seriously lagged behind them, preferring to live off its name and past laurels until finally forced to change their practices as their market share dropped. The point being made is that neither Glock nor Colt have been very innovative. They stick with a well proven design while others either improve on it or come up with something better. In this regard I would agree Colt is ahead of Glock. At least Colt has designed and built more than one gun. Colt's logo may be a pony, but at least they are not a one trick pony like Glock.

[@MrSmith-zy2bp]

Small Arms Solutions has been over this. "Modular" for how the military defined it, was the pistol would adapt to fit different sized hands and have ambidextrous controls. Glock's submission met that "modular" requirement. Now I agree, I think the removable FCU is what won SIG the contract.

[@kevinschaefer9060]

Sig underbid GLOCK with the plan to make up the difference in frames and ammo.

[@MrSmith-zy2bp]

@@kevinschaefer9060 yes, we all know the SIG was cheaper than Glock. However, a pistol that can do a simple frame swap with a removalable FCU, was definitely seen as a plus.

[@murphykenji]

Sounds like they wrote the bid requirements to match the product Sig was already manufacturing even though the requirements don't make operational sense... I suspect that Sig company reps bought some generals and congressmen a lot of steak dinners and lapdances.

[@MrSmith-zy2bp]

@@murphykenji no, not at all. You need to read what "modularity" is in the HMS requirement. You'll find out modularity only means ambidextrous controls and any method to change the size of the grip for different hand sizes. The Glock met all of those modularity requirements. There was no requirement for a removable chassis. (Small Arm Solutions; Start at the 2:28 mark. kzbin.info/www/bejne/jJ-Wf3aEfsilfaM ) Did the removable chassis sway their decision? I think it probably did, along with cheaper price.

[@murphykenji]

@@MrSmith-zy2bp it would have swayed me in the opposite direction. I'm not an engineer, but fewer parts is better than less parts, and making those parts unnecessarily accessible and easy to lose or incorrectly reassemble makes no sense. I think there's a difference in the frame materials too. Where the Glock frame is mildly flexible, the Sig frame is harder and feels more brittle. I think time will tell in the reliability and durability comparison. The M17 isn't "cheaper" if they have to replace them twice as fast.

[@mechag7379]

The main change I would make would be to add grip frame options either with a modular system or some other way. The ability to make radical changes with different grip modules without buying a whole new gun is what has intrigued me with the P320.

[@BertShackleford]

As an ambidextrous person, I think all manufacturers should make _full_ ambi controls. I repeat - *_FULL ambidextrous controls._* Both rifles and pistols for what it is worth. I also despise the fact that we have to pay extra (sometimes a ridiculous amount) for ambi controls. Especially when they are not always _full_ ambi controls. That irks me even more! It's the 21st Century - get with the times already and make full ambidextrous controls _standard_ instead of exclusive. Stay classy my friends.

[@crepuscularkitten4911]

I concur Bert.

[@0dayExploit]

I’m fine with ambi everything if the ambi pistol mag catch is HK lever style. I’ve used pistols with ambi buttons and I’m not a fan

[@Sman7290]

Another generation of "perfection" that's the same as the last one.

[@Sergeantgrunt]

If Glock would just adopt the modularity like Sig has done, they could do all these things in one generation. Manual safety, integrated mag well, design, metal* frames, different grip angles. It's all there! Partner with a company like P80 and have them design different frames and offer them as an option.

[@buffaloSoldier519]

Or Zev since they already made the modular frame

[@soonerfrac4611]

Had they done that they would have won the military contract!

[@soonerfrac4611]

In fact, I believe that the Army said they were very disappointed that Glock didn’t make it modular.... *like the contract stipulated!!!*

[@godgunsandgoldens]

There main claim of simplicity and interchangeable parts would be gone with your suggestions.

[@kreevisful]

@@soonerfrac4611 💯

[@jeramyw]

Is it gonna be better and different but the same and "perfect"?

[@tugboat_actual]

The perfect refers to the mechanics inside the gun. When you compare all gens, the internals are all pretty much the same. Minor upgrades due to technology improvements

[@Cluck11]

@@tugboat_actual not perfect internals, but damn good. Doesn't keep out mud as well as some pistols

[@tambrody2684]

GLOCK PERFECTION AHHH PERFECT NEVER HAVE TO CHANGE ANYTHING AFTER 39 YEARS

[@RD4059]

The worst thing Glock could do would be to add a manual safety. I ain’t got time for that!

[@agmsmith4079]

In every class I’ve taken with people who are running guns with manual safeties or decocker, by the end of the class every singer person says they are gonna buy a glock. Not having the manual safety is the better way to go for self defense. When put in training Scenarios it’s completely obvious. Even with tons of training the safety is just another step you need to do before you save your own life.

[@whiteafricannun3377]

@@agmsmith4079 they should go out and buy a walther PPQ better gun in every way.

[@ryanespinoza7297]

@@agmsmith4079 and anyone who is running a class and first thought when they forget the safety is “gee I need a different gun” instead of “hmm that’s embarrassing, better practice that more” wasn’t going to be ready for any situation anyways. If they can’t remember a manual safety then they’ll probably be scared enough to walk around with an empty chamber and then forget to rack it. The gun doesn’t make up for the user’s inabilities, it’s the other way around

[@agmsmith4079]

@@ryanespinoza7297 ...in a stressful situation when you get an adrenaline dump, regardless of how many times you’ve practiced and trained, you will forget the safety. Watch active self protection, it happens all the time in real life encounters.

[@markreed9398]

Safety option is better.

[@operator8014]

How will Glock keep their products relevant and competitive? They'll make sure it says "Glock" on the side... That's the only thing that's sold a Glock in the last 20 years. What's the rest of their sales pitch? "Hey man, do you want a gun that costs $200 more than the closest comparative product, is less comfortable than a prostate exam, has inarguably one of the worst factory triggers available, and is widely recognized as the Honda Civic of the gun world!? Don't worry, it still says Glock on the side". SOLD!

[@curtislynch8189]

What stock striker-fired polymer wonder nine is leaps and bounds better than a glock? They’re easy to shoot, affordable, durable, and simple. I’ve shot the p320 and the ppq, and they are not leaps and bounds better than a Glock. And if you’re going to buy something like an HK why the crap would you go with a vp instead of the p30 or USP?

[@joewayne9951]

Your an Idiot

[@cobain2261]

@@curtislynch8189 cz p10c or just about anything really

[@maton2251]

MAC is offering one of the most comprahensive practical analisys of weapon systems on KZbin. 10/10 from me.

[@HansKlopek]

Yay a new brick. Yawn.

[@brysonw1815]

Your still gonna buy it

[@rotwang2000]

There lies the problem, some people will not buy it because it's a brick and a ton of people will stop buying it the second it's no longer a brick.

[@richrhocks]

James Reeves will be happier than a fat girl in a cup cake factory.

[@Militaryarmschannel]

That made me spit out my coffee. James is a friend of mine, I'll have to screen shot this and share it with him.

[@mohammadhammad3804]

@@Militaryarmschannel you forgot to mention 1 big difference between the g3 and g4. G4 has a bump on the trigger bar that the g3 doesnt have

[@MarriedFucker]

@@Militaryarmschannel keep this in mind. SECRETARIAT and GLOCK are both “one trick ponies”. However, their ONE TRICK is to outrace and beat the dog crap out of everyone else with what they simply are every single time. Secretariat did it over 50 years ago and his records are thus yet unbeaten. Same with Glock.

[@facetiousmonkey5322]

@@MarriedFucker also Secretariat lives forever as his bloodline races on.

[@MarriedFucker]

@@facetiousmonkey5322 exactly. He DIRECTLY sired more than 1,100 horses. No joke.

[@nathanielrasey]

After gen 3 came out everything after that has been kinda pointless.

[@stb301]

No, everything after gen 4 has been nominal "improvements". Gen 4 is the definitive Glock.

[@christianwiseman3712]

Idk I really like the flared magwell on my gen 5 g22, the recoil also feels softer compared to the gen 4 g22

[@irvxing]

Lol Gen 4 shot the casing right back at you. Gen 3 is where it was good.

[@Youtubeuser1aa]

Backstrap

[@slingblade37814]

Gen 3 was the worst.

[@friartuck103]

Just like apple, they release a "new" generation with little to no changes. But, like apple, there are glock fan boys that will run out and lick glocks taint.

[@mandapalque]

When i suggest glock to people, the first thing i tell them is: RELIABILITY. However my favorite and my carry gun is a M&P40 2.0. I personally shot bette with this one, but cant deny the GLOCK dependability. You can call people that buy GLOCKS fanboys, but how about first gun owners, how does that makes them fanboys. I can feel the hate in you. No bueno.

[@jb76489]

Don’t you have anything better to do than being but hurt over what other people buy

[@mandapalque]

@@jb76489 apparently he does not. GLOCK still extremly reliable. Thst is the most important thing for a fire arm.

[@friartuck103]

@@mandapalque Yeah, I have nothing bad to say about the gun, I'm mocking the company. But, I will stick with my beretta 92fs any day.

[@jeffdaman6969]

@@mandapalque this. I have a glock. It is my first gun. I have it for protection because it’s reliable. That’s it. That’s all I care about.

[@adaboy4z]

Most thorough comparison of all the Glocks!! Learned a lot here.

[@TheFish711]

My first thought when I read “glock gen 6” I thought “maybe they decided there should be finger grooves after all” because everyone knows they aren’t changing anything else.

[@Montana_lifestyle]

Gen 5s are perfect. Leave it alone

[@alucardthebeast8704]

Watched 15 minutes and when its time for the big reveal.... well what I think it will have is this and this such a waste of time could have labeled the video predictions of the gen 6 glock

[@nataliedeyton6829]

It’s just a glock .... that’s what I think of every Glock and I EDC one and have for years. It’s not magical or beautiful but the damn thing just works.

[@gamingdreams2142]

Exactly all these glock haters are the people who care if the gun looks cool. The gun looking cool is not going to matter when life or death situation is on the line.

[@brighthought11]

your claim to fame is the gun works? most guns work lmao, I own two sig sauers and a CZ and have never had a single issue. sure did have issues with my g43 and g20 my g17 and 43x were kosher, but their not immune to not working, and they dont have a real safety

[@arty7n67]

@@brighthought11 Please dont compare sig sauers to anything else especially when you dont shoot your guns. Sig is pure trash period.

[@jerkforsure8387]

@@arty7n67 maybe the modern day Sigs... the German guns were not.

[@gekisaidai1811]

@@brighthought11 I've owned a variety of pistols over the years, sig, s&w, springfield, cz, Berreta, glock and at at the beginning when I could afford nothing else a highpoint. Of those brands only 2 failed to work straight from the factory and had the exact same problem, consistent failure to go in to battery. Those were the Sig 365 and the highpoint. My edc for a decade has been a g19. I upgraded to the gen 5 2 years ago. A low ball estimate of the round count on the gen 4 considering I shoot at least once a month and a minimum of 100 rds is somewhere around 10k rounds. Thats 10k rounds without a single failure. I changed the springs probably 4 years ago and not because it was having problems, just because the round count was high and I want to insure reliability

[@johndeere1951a]

So glad you acknowledged my H&K VP70Z. It sat on Gaston Glocks desk as they discussed the G17 design 👍💥⚠️☮️🇺🇲

[@yewtewb3628]

There's no Gen 6 Glock in this video, turn back! Clickbait!

[@TheGreenWeenie0311]

Glock hasn't innovated since the 80s because it didn't need to. It's polymer, available in almost every popular caliber, is now optics ready with mos models, and has an accessory rail. What else really needs to change that's important? The modular trigger system in the Sig is cool, but I don't see any real world use for it, and it seems like a gimmick to me. Sig, S&W, and others took 20 years to catch up to Glock, and their so called innovations amount to ergonomic tweaks and other minor differences. Call me a Glock fanboy, but that's the way I see it. Great video as always, just sharing my opinion.

[@HillbillyNitroUSA]

I’ll stick with my 2nd & 3rd Gen Glock preference...💥 Giving a good nod to the Gen 4 🖖🏻

[@EvolvinEvo]

Click bait. Gen 5 just came out a couple years ago, we aren’t seeing a gen 6 for a few years.

[@ashshell278]

You are a good person.

[@John-ro3vu]

Yup

[@thatguy4087]

4 sho

[@thebenior]

I doubt we'd see a Gen 6 until a large contract forces Glock to make one, which is how we got the Gen 5 pistols.

[@johnband3]

Finger grooves or not doesn't matter to me. Been waiting for the G20 in 10mm in the next GEN series for over 2 years. The wait is killing me. Thanks for sharing.

[@wiggybends3632]

I have 2 gen 3 glock 20 - 1 sf, 1 standard frame - best guns ever

[@willyounger9772]

They best not change the grip angle.

[@SolidTrashTier]

For the love of God, please never change it. It's weird how the old M1911 grip angle became the standard, considering the M1911A1 actually went to the glock grip angle. After ww1 they learned it was the wrong grip angle due to people shooting low under stress.

[@tannicapple]

Improved ergonomics. Idk why its so hard for them to improve. Thats why the CZ P10C did so well when it came out.

[@tannicapple]

@@Watchdog_McCoy_5.7x28 I'm talking more about of it feels in the palm. Its a brick. CZ, M&P, VP9 and many others all feel so much better. The angle doesn't bother me so much

[@jacobmccandles1767]

It's 17° grip angle is it's most loved/hated feature. The biggest reason they can't change it is MAGAZINES. Change the grip angle too much and they'll have to design a new mag. Personally I think they should do that, contracting to Superior Firepower or MecGar for mags. And make a damn PCC. It's easy, even Hi-point can do it.

[@tannicapple]

@@Watchdog_McCoy_5.7x28 I switched over and started carrying the 365XL and love it. It shoots amazing, easier to conceal, and feels great. Have you tried the 48?

[@blm148]

@@tannicapple good thing that you don’t walk around with them in your hand all day then. A defensive/offensive situation puts it in your hands for a few seconds to minutes and a day at the range several minutes. How it feels means shit compared to how the grip helps you index the gun and manage recoil and none of the competitors do that better. All just my opinion though.

[@AlaskanBallistics]

The p10c has a horrible ergonomics

[@dillonduty9769]

Make a pcc. Everyone will buy a gen 6 even if it’s the same as a gen 5. Just put a quality night sight on it and actually upgrade the trigger and the gen 6 will be a hit. If they make a pcc that would be epic.

[@kanaka118446]

The G44 should have been a PCC but no, they had to make the street legal hand grenade that is the 10rd G19 size .22lr

[@Calcapwn300]

Just steel sights are enough. But do a proper reddot slide cut. Yes, a pcc would be great

[@myoozikismylife]

Yeah! Make a ppc that takes glock magazines like every other weapons manufacturer.

[@ronivichman666]

In Israel we have for about a year now a gun called "Ramon" made by Emtan industries, it's an Israeli version of the Glock 19 Gen 3, and includes a soft trigger, night sights and also a compensator model. It really took the market in Israel by storm team, you would really love it. I may buy one for myself in the future I just don't have the money.

[@ahnonymuch4183]

Tim is getting clickbaity lately; not amused.

[@KoachOfGaal]

KZbins algorithms already make firearms content less prioritized, adding a clickbait-ish title bumps the video up in the algorithm, expanding the number of organic viewership.

[@LuvBorderCollies]

Its a trend across U-tube not just here. The Utube overlords are constantly hosing up the algorithms.

[@SgtRudySmith31bRet]

@@LuvBorderCollies sorry I dont think there's anything click-baity about the yankee marshall....... sorry I cant finish

[@LuvBorderCollies]

@@SgtRudySmith31bRet What are babbling about?

[@thewatcher611]

Ok, good, then don't watch. Oh wait you did. Then you would know that this video was about the Glock Gen 6. Which is actually THE TITLE of the video. How is that clickbait?

[@alexcardwell2246]

There is absolutely no reason to make such drastic changes, they own 80% of the the law enforcement and military market for one damn good reason, they go bang and it’s fairly hard to make them not go bang. Realistic changes may be a more pronounced trigger guard undercut, texturing the thumb index points, and various little fixes to current features.

[@scottjernigan7286]

Except they ARE losing market share. A lot more guns are just as reliable but offer more right out of box.

[@scottjernigan7286]

I’ve bought my last Glock. Came out of box with front site not cut straight across top. Yes I can change it but why should I have to. Don’t I can buy a CZ

[@alexcardwell2246]

@@scottjernigan7286 Hey man, you can buy whatever you want, nobody is saying otherwise. It’s something to say that it took all of these other companies 40 years to catch up with Glock, I’ve owned 9 different Glocks, something about them just keeps me coming back. Now just because you don’t like them for whatever reason (IE: You don’t know how to use them, they are to big for your hands, you think $550 is a large sum for a base model gun...Whatever) doesn’t mean they aren’t outstanding firearms and thus really don’t need fixed. That said, drop the attitude, nobody cares who you are. Get over yourself.

[@boostlessgt8639]

But...the Trigger guard is to small when I’m wearing my winter mittens.

[@alexcardwell2246]

@@boostlessgt8639 Well shit I guess we should just throw it away and get Mk.23s

[@ronsorrentino6207]

Personally, I’m one who is fine with the finger grooves. Prefer the Gen 3’s to this day. To each their own.

[@nitegoat1369]

Same.

[@DanMar5858]

Heck, I’m still rolling with a Gen2 that I bought in the 90’s that I added a Hogue Handall grip to. I finally changed out my original one to a new Hogue last year. 27 years on my G19 though and it still works just fine. Lost count of how many thousands of rounds I put through it during that time. People hate on them, but they just keep on working!

[@iaj1410]

im still waiting for that .44 magnum glock

[@jeramyw]

10mm magnum

[@jeramyw]

@Adam Korzeniowski No it's not. The case is too short. The magnum has roughly the same case length as other magnums.

[@Da1AboveA11]

460 Rowland

[@afinoxi]

50AE. Nuff said. Though 44 would be more avaiable , so there's that.

[@bradhaines3142]

.410 definitely the way to go

[@centurian318]

Glock hasn’t even brought the large framed glocks (20, 21, 29, 30, 40, 41) to Gen 5 yet. They just now brought the 22, 23 .40 smith glocks to Gen 5 with a beefed up slide, barrel, and recoil spring assembly. Glock should have done that years ago

[@centurian318]

@@brandonschwertley2723 That would be awesome, I’m on the verge of getting the 22 Gen 5 but the 21 was my first duty gun. I wonder if that is when they will roll out the Gen 5 35 as well?

[@dwaynewalker986]

As a hunter and outdoorsman a "winter trigger guard" would work for me. I just installed a Side R Lock safety on my 21. I like it. A very positive on/off accompanied by a very audible click . The safety button is somewhat protected by the trigger guard against accidental manipulation and installing it didn't void my Glock warranty. On the down side, the safe action part appears to be larger than the factory piece thereby taking up even more space in an already cramped trigger guard. I haven't had it on the gun long enough to speak towards if it's as rust proof as the manufacturer claims it is. All said and done , I like my gen3 Mod. 21 whether its dressed up as 10mm or 45 (Super).

[@danm1841]

Having never owned a Glock....this was very informative and very well done. Thanks for the video!

[@crypticdealer4390]

I love my gen 4 glock 22 there great guns

[@teddytwoguns2846]

I have owned 4 glocks all g20s

[@albundy06]

Doesn't matter what Glock does. The haters are gonna hate.

[@markblevins5610]

Old man once told me u can have any hand gun as long it was black and glock

[@Mattlock52]

Glocks are tools. The grip angle was intentional. A new shooter learns on a glock grip angle and that is all they are comfortable with. The sights are cheap to help keep cost down knowing most people would replace them regardless. Mag interchangeability is genius. The ability to own full size, compact, and subcompact while utilizing the same mags is huge. The cheap cost of mags / parts is another really big advantage. Glocks are intentionally utilitarian.

[@turok6969]

Addition of Grip zone like springfield but says "Hand goes here stupid"

[@Leo___________]

Gen 2 will have the 'pew zone' after some unfortunate misunderstandings

[@callofduty732]

Maybe that will be a dementia Joe's next to gun control bill. 🤔 Every part must be clearly labeled to ensure safety to the users and those in the surrounding 🤣

[@XDWX]

"Holdy-ony" part

[@Marek-pv9sy]

Dude that is hilarious!

[@Murphy82nd]

I wouldn't call the stock Glock trigger "extremely bad". I say this as someone that has owned a PPQ, VP9, P10, and aftermarket trigger options. Do I think it could be better? Absolutely.

[@jasonfranciosa]

Agree, the Gen 5 Triggers are really not bad at all, especially with their intended market. They are not designed to be competition guns (At least their primary models, the 19 and 17) with hair triggers that break at 2lbs with no creep. They are a combat pistol and their triggers are most certainly not terrible.

[@stephenlott6968]

Always hated factory Glock triggers. They're fine for a short session, but anything over 50 rounds makes my trigger finger sore.

[@ilikemachieneguns]

Oh look, it’s the gun equivalent of the newest iphone.

[@jeffdaman6969]

It works tho 🤷‍♂️

[@o01chris10o]

Lol spot on

[@TommyboyGTP]

Nice try, but no lol

[@feblehober123]

This is even more pointless than buying the new iphone because all glocks run the same 9mm OS just as fast.

[@jeffdaman6969]

@@feblehober123 but you can get a used glock and it will work. Glock 1-5 are fine from my understanding. Are you buying a iPhone 6? How about an 8? Will it be as good as a iPhone 12?

[@bramvandelooverbosch8167]

The marksman barrel is wrong advertising. The only thing it does is making it a marking barrel. Some agency's wanted a barrel that can be identified. A polygonal barrel is almost impossible to identify what bullet went trough it. The groves on the new barrel gives you that option. Doesn’t do much to the accuracy.

[@GunFunZS]

Right. It also goes along with their dubious claim of the polygonal not being safe with cast bullets. Many people have shown that claim not to show anything measurable or observable. If there was truth to it in some obscure circumstance I wouldn't be surprised. but as people actually use cast bullets they were always fine with the original standard Glock barrels. The Glock wouldn't admit that this gives them a way to market a special product for those people too. And they never have to admit that there wasn't much to their claim. This is particularly relevant since major manufacturers are now doing polymer jacketed cast or swagged bullets such as the federal syntek for example. Basically the same as many people have been doing for themselves or buying as a component from many different bullet manufacturers. Glock really in their marketing box himself into a corner by declaring themselves perfect every change must be unnecessary or a downgrade right? So to change anything they have to make up an obscure new reason for the change. They always advertise the political rifling as being substantially more accurate and less destructive to the bullet The letter claim might be a little more justifiable. If the polygonal rifling was always more accurate why would the marksman barrel have lands and grooves? Wouldn't that be a downgrade? I mean the boring answer is they were both about equally accurate and very similar in where life and very similar in manufacturing, and slightly different but not very different in the effects of the barrel has on the bullet.

[@LuvBorderCollies]

@@GunFunZS I shot thousands of cast bullets through my issue Glock 17 Gen2. To avoid potential problems with the polygonal barrel I scrubbed the bore after every shooting session which was 200 rounds. Its the only way I could shoot it enough to get proficient with its brick shaped grip and horrendous NY trigger.

[@GunFunZS]

@@LuvBorderCollies did you ever experience leading? Also have you tried powder coated cast bullets? if not you really should there is never any lead divorce contact unless something has been done very wrong.

[@LuvBorderCollies]

@@GunFunZS This was 1991 - 95 era so it was strictly bare lead with blue lube. I could see streaks of lead throughout the barrel after a range session. That was my issue Glock so I was extra careful to avoid damaging it or blowing it apart with reloads. That would've bought a lot of days off without pay. So scrubbing the bore clean of any lead was paramount. If one of the armorer staff had found lead in the bore I'd have lots of 'splaining to do. Luckily the poly rifling was not hard to clean. Coated bullets I just started this past year and shot some 45acp but not enough experience to comment on them.

[@GunFunZS]

@@LuvBorderCollies Cool. It's almost certain that you could have had no leading with better lube technology and probably a little fatter/harder bullets. And that's just with the old style lubed lead bullets. Powder coat or other polymer jacketing such as Hi-Tek or Federal Syntek (sp?) completely eliminates leading and copper fouling. You still have powder residue but cleanup is a breeze. Crowd sourcing development over the last decade ish has really improved the quality and performance of self made ammo. IMO Federal was copying what end users came up with. Also with controlled alloy, and a chronograph there is getting to be a body of info that means we can really make defensive quality ammo whether or not it is in stores. This is kinda at the beginning, but Loads of Bacon here on youtube started the project a few years ago, of quantifying expansion with iterative testing of a few popular HP bullet designs. So the same bullet gel tested with a softer or harder alloy, with more or less velocity, then results quantified. So long as you use the same mold and you shoot it at the same velocity with the same alloy, you can get the same controlled expansion. It's a great time. There's a lot of data to be filled in still, but the body of knowledge is constantly growing.

[@nyarlatothep666]

The market: “We want ambidextrous controls, iron sights made from metal, a manual safety...” Gaston Glock: “Nein! Die Pistole ist fine.”

[@Leo___________]

Armed forces all over the world: Glock is good, safe and simple pistol for conscripts and professional. The US armed forces: *OMG NO MANUAL SAFETY LITERALLY EVERYONE WILL DIE*

[@scatattack9774]

I don’t want any of those things

[@dojos2874]

Got a glock because it has no manual safety. Ready to fire out of the Holster🤌

[@EvilWiffles]

@@dojos2874 Also ready to fire inside your holster lmao.

[@youraveragereloader649]

@@EvilWiffles i mean, the Glock have an Internal Safety to stop that exact thing

[@w0lfATTACK]

Glock doesn’t need to change for your satisfaction. They’ve been a best seller for those 40 years for a reason. If you don’t like it, don’t buy it. 🤷🏻‍♂️

[@greywolfarmory7336]

Early Gen5 guns did have the cut on the grip for pinch removal of the magazine and did not have front slide serrations. Gen4 guns in 9mm and 40 were discontinued in late 2020. Gen3 guns from 2018 to 2020 were only sold with 10 round mags for CA and MA. Gen3 SKUs were reintroduced with normal capacity mags when the Gen4 models were discontinued. The Gen5 has a redesigned fire control system where most parts are not the same as prior models. The 19x front magwell extension was put in for the military contract as a design feature to prevent pinching gloves when changing magazines, not to "protect the magazine from being banged."

[@travishouser5290]

Glock... 5 generations of increasingly perfect perfection.

[@cheddarshredder6572]

Haha no.

[@theGhost_141]

@@cheddarshredder6572 thank you. I hate Glocks

[@theGhost_141]

Um...no.

[@travishouser5290]

Sarcasm is apparently a lost art...

[@armedrebellion47]

Whatever Glock does people will still complain.

[@Chris-tw4jm]

And that’s the reality. If they make a giant change that’s a huge business risk and imo the reason I buy a Glock is because it’s a GLOCK. It just works, it feels good enough, and it is reasonably priced. They sell TONS of guns, and it’s a good product. I honestly don’t want them to change.

[@whiskeyactual.]

Exactly

[@jeffdaman6969]

@@Chris-tw4jm this. I got a glock. I know what a glock does. I need a reliable gun for protection. Glock gives me that.

[@cheddarshredder6572]

@@jeffdaman6969 so does about 10 other companies and some more affordable

[@marcusborderlands6177]

@@jeffdaman6969 congrats, you bought the average gun in the 20th century...

[@MyWatchIsEnded]

I know somebody's going to mention it but I thought I might as well. The MHS program modularity requirements only required the ability to add or remove a back strap and that's it. The reason why the sig was chosen over the Glock was not because it was the superior weapon or more modular but because sig literally gave them away at cost to the military just like how Glock had a trade in program for law enforcement to get rid of their non Glock firearms and get a free Glock. It's all about marketing yourself and since Glock has an extremely high profitability with a low cost they were not willing to undercut the value of the guns since they sold like hotcakes on the private market. For the longest time the sig had repeated failures and issues until they finally worked out the kinks to make it as reliable as a Glock and pretty much any other modern miracle nine. The distance between the bottom of the slide and where the hand rests on the underside of the beaver tail is horrendous on the M18.

[@erozion8211]

I love Glock’s reliability ...but I wish they were more ergonomic and felt better in the hand, had a better trigger, had better factory sights, and was truly fully ambi. These are the reasons I prefer the CZ P10 series. Glock could be and should be better from the factory. I don’t care for the idea of buying a Glock and spending more to put new optics and trigger in there like everyone else does just to get it on par with other factory guns on the market at cheaper price - but still overall feel blocky in the hand Very respectable firearm; but I think there’s other firearms that rival or even surpass its “perfection” ...including in terms of reliability

[@brighthought11]

seems like a common phenomenon in the gun community. People are led to glocks based off of reputation of police/mil use and movies/games over the years. Nothing wrong with them, until you realize Sig and CZ for example offer much more for the $$$

[@soonerfrac4611]

Glock has the market share because they offer the pistols to LEO agencies for half or less price. That means that they have a plethora of ready built users & it’s what the civilian shooters see cops carrying they try to carry.

[@freedomsglory1]

There’s few things you guys are missing here. What you want already exists, you want ambi controls? Buy a VP9 or a P10, don’t buy a Glock. The market already has you covered. But if you want to mix and match parts have an abundance of aftermarket parts to go to if you want this upgraded or that upgraded then buy a Glock. It’s not the best pistol ever, it’s not perfect or reliable when you start just throwing random parts into it without confirming that it can work with each other. Glock isn’t perfect, but neither is the AR platform...the perfection is that the individual can build it to be “perfect” for them and their needs. If it doesn’t meet your needs and you need something like the P10 or the 320? That already exists on the market.

[@kennetic9196]

@@brighthought11 Funny thing is, I started with Glock, then went to other guns, then went back to Glock. I'm right-handed, so I have no use for ambi controls. I still prefer the Gen 4 compacts over the Gen 5s. The finger grooves on the compacts fit my hand great and I prefer the shape of the backstrap over say the M&P and PPQ. I wish the grip angle was more vertical but I've been using Glock so long it's not a dealbreaker. The trigger guard needs changing, the trigger needs changing, but overall I shoot Glocks just fine so it doesn't really matter.

[@PandemicGameplay]

The P10C is a better gun period. Comes with night sights, higher bore axis, more accurate, higher capacity standard mags, better quality materials.

[@Catgat37]

I want them to just come out with a steel frame version of a Glock 19.

[@vincea1830]

That would be far too much to ask for a company that still doesn't care to add metal sights

[@Catgat37]

@@vincea1830 It is ok. I started getting into Walthers recently. The fact that they made a steel framed version of a PPQ when nobody asked for it was a great idea on their end. It is the gun that I never knew I needed.....now I need more Walthers.

[@ShaolinRonin1]

Glock "Im not leaving." Me "If it aint broke, don't fix it."

[@user-yj7ph9vk2k]

Make them thinner. They have proven with the 48 and 41 that it's possible.

[@borkwoof696]

Y tho

[@brighthought11]

thinner is better for most people , easier to conceal, more comfortable.

[@borkwoof696]

@@brighthought11 doesn’t really matter on a full size service pistol and can actually make it harder to shoot

[@user-yj7ph9vk2k]

@@borkwoof696 no. It makes it far easier and more comfortable to conceal.

[@borkwoof696]

@@user-yj7ph9vk2k which isn’t the point of a service pistol. If you want a slim G19, get a G48

[@vzgun5888]

Glock is like a Rick Astley song. You resist listening to it but can’t help but signing along once it’s on

[@DARTHDANSAN]

As long as Glock is in business making Glocks .. I’m good

[@TRIIGGAVELLI]

Well even if they want bankrupt tomorrow somehow I have a feeling there's enough laying around to where we're good for a while.

[@atomicsmith]

New ambidextrous trigger for Gen 6. Finally, Just what all the fans have been asking for.

[@scottjernigan7286]

Ambi Trigger WTF hahhA

[@itscwillis1523]

The trigger is ambi?

[@LA-TEEZI]

@@itscwillis1523 🤦🏻‍♂️

[@CopperBurrito1]

Groundbreaking.

[@joshuabrown4030]

Not useful until Glock adds ambidextrous grip stippling! 😜

[@jdk10880]

I have gen2-5 Glock 19s, all factory stock, and love them just the way they are!

[@codycox2685]

I'd rather see an M&P 2.0 in a 6" 10mm with 15 rd mag cap and adjustable sights.

[@chrism2042]

Been waiting for a 10mm M&P

[@codycox2685]

@@chrism2042 I'd even take a P320 or H&K VP10, maybe a cz polymer 10mm. just more polymer framed, budget friendly 10mm options would be great!

[@chrism2042]

@@codycox2685 - I had glocks for years, about 10 years ago I decided to try the M&P which put me on a path to getting several M&P's in 9mm & 45. The M&P's have been just as reliable as any glock I have ever owned. I still carry a gen 4 G19 on occasion but partial to the M&P. I waited for the M&P compact to come out and now waiting for a M&P 10mm

[@codycox2685]

@@chrism2042 me too man. I like my glock 40 10mm just fine but an MP 2.0 would kick its ass.

[@chriserasmus9398]

Glock has become a dinosaur stumbling forth under its own momentum

[@wmercer7234]

If it's not broke...

[@litewatefitr]

Insert fudd 1911 joke here....

[@jhawkdire3434]

I agree but I also carry a revolver and love 1911s... dinosaurs are cool. 🦕 🦖

[@stephenj6203]

Didn't they give us oil?

[@Dnt132]

Won't lie 20 minutes of video and I enjoyed every minute it wasn't long and drawn out and I learned loads.

[@TACTICOOLREDNECK]

If someone doesn't like something about a glock they can buy something else we buy glocks because we like glocks simple as that.

[@cincinnatifunk]

Awomen

[@craigslistsales4424]

From this video, I got “Glock needs to be more like sig”

[@billbob4585]

MAC has never really been a fan of Glocks. However, when you have a pistol that shoots accurately, has a reputation for reliability and durability, plus the aftermarket and ease of replacement parts, to drastically change much would be a mistake in my opinion.

[@thesmallestminorityisthein4045]

No, glock just needs to stop making stupid choices. At least Glock actually uses Generations, unlike Sig which just says 'fuck off, mate'

[@brahtrumpwonbigly7309]

@@billbob4585 The only mistake there is pretending Glock still has a monopoly on those things. They don't. Basically every manufacturer has a handgun in production that equals Glock "reliability" (mine have always had issues), the difference is most other companies actually innovate occasionally.

[@TheMcpvideo]

sig got the military contract because they were the lowest bidder

[@BcFuTw9jt]

And SOCOM is still is running glocks not sigs. Glock doesn't need to do anything to keep making money

[@00Klingon]

If Glock does a modular, serialized trigger system, I don't think they should just call it a new generation. It should be a whole new model because that one single model could take the place of the 17, 19, 26, and 19x based on what grip frame or slide and barrel you put on it.

[@citizenkane454]

Sold my glock for a cz and haven't looked back.

[@hickboyjusthick698]

You are not alone. My P07 is so much better than my G19

[@brighthought11]

sold glock 43 for glock 43x , sold that for sig sauer p365XL, never looked back. sold my g17/g20 and picked up a CZ75 P01, never looked back

[@citizenkane454]

@@brighthought11 sold my gen 3 glock 17 for a cz p10c. Then I sold my 34 for a p07. And then I bought a p10f and an m&p lol

[@DTWCT]

@@hickboyjusthick698 same. Traded my G23(first gun I ever bought) for a P07. Sooo much better. Got a tactical sport too for 3 gun. CZs are like potato chips

[@hickboyjusthick698]

@@DTWCT yep. I now own several p07s with the CGW Cajun Gun Works package and my EDC is the CZ2075 Rami. I love that thing. For the money, CZ cannot be beat.

[@bsievers33]

Hate the grip on every Glock

[@rickl.1603]

I think you kind of nailed it, the safety and modular system would sell it out like crazy

[@nauticalobbyz-8972]

My heart is forever with gen 3

[@Bulldog75stp]

This has been talked about ad nauseam. Glock met EVERY aspect of modularity for the trials. They didn't win the contract solely based on price per unit.

[@kennetic9196]

Seriously, the Army doesn't even use the Sigs modularity. Instead of buying compact frames for the M17, they just bought entire pistols and called it the M18. They could have done the exact same thing with Glock.

[@DanAllen117]

They didn't lose it solely based on price, it was just the biggest factor. It also shouldn't come as a surprise since price has always affected military contracts, at least in the U.S.. Besides, even if they met every aspect certainly doesn't mean they tried to go above and beyond, which Sig did, presenting 2 guns to Glock's 1, having the manual safety, and the modular trigger being swappable to other frames and slides. Honestly, I just don't see why they should have picked Glock at all. I don't have a problem with Glocks. Just looking at this objectively.

[@Bulldog75stp]

@@DanAllen117 You said it. Sig had to use two guns to met all the factors that Glock did in one. Almost forgot about that. Thanks. The trials were suspended after the price came out. It was based on price.

[@petermagnus9919]

@@kennetic9196 The interesting bit about modularity is to look to other NATO members, if you look at Norway wich was the first NATO member to adopt the Glock p80. You will see that they dont care about frames, the slide is the expensive bit. As a result they had the Glock factory refit their P80s with Gen 4 frames, note they have not adopted the double recoil assembly sot heir newest slides are gen3. With that view to modularity it does not make any sense to make a tiny piece the "firearm" and keep much more expensive parts as spares, why not just buy a compact gun like the P85(G19)?

[@kennetic9196]

@@DanAllen117 Price will always be the driving factor, particularly with handguns. From what we've learned since 1985, the P226 was better than the 92. Was it so much better that it was worth what Sig was asking? Ehhhh probably not. That being said, I've had issues with the M17 already, the triggers have a nasty habit of not wanting to reset and the safety is ergonomically atrocious. Glock would not have had these issues since US special operations has been using the Gen 3 19 for quite a few years now. I'm also genuinely curious how Sig managed to undercut the price of Glock since Glock has been selling to LE at an absurd discount for decades.