"Godfather of artificial intelligence" talks impact and potential of new AI

[@bigman7856]

Pints with Aquinas?

[@apologiaromana4123]

Based

[@michallukac4668]

Came here only for Matt. :D

[@KyleWhittington]

Matt Fradd sent me here

[@Thomas-dw1nb]

Matt Fradd! Pints with Aquinas! GK Chesterton and "Neglect of Cheese!" There, I've summed up all that is truly important about this video in three short lines.

[@brianayers1736]

Not how I expected Matt Fradd to break I to mainstream.

[@mariayanez4200]

"It's writing me a poem about cheese. And it's pretty good!" God bless you Matt for this gem! 😁

[@emmadumais2337]

Lol, here because of Matt Fradd! On the side note, anyone else find all this AI talk concerning? It's not natural.....

[@littledrummergirl_19]

Just here to see just how Matt Fradd got on CBS with a poem about cheese 😂

[@matthewluisantero5051]

I came here for Matt Fradd

[@samuelstratton2143]

Matt frad 🎉🎉🎉

[@blackrim01]

Here for Pints

[@mooregabeplease]

Who else is here from PWA?

[@perhael]

Pints With Aquinas!!!

[@os2171]

This is like those journalists clips of the 90s “what is the super high way of information “?

[@robertholtz]

SO true. 👏

[@vagrant1943]

lmao

[@RyanSurfsYoutube]

We're living in historic times. It was bound to happen and we're alive to see this coming to fruition... For better or for worse.

[@EpoRose1]

Only here for Matt Fradd.

[@sebastianvargas864]

Same

[@lorenzoleongutierrez7927]

That “guy” is an hero and inspiration for many of us . Respect.

[@lorenzoleongutierrez7927]

@John Beeeeeh jajjjajajaja

[@filipkogut8533]

@John you'll be wiped by ai, bye

[@ConnorPatrickNolan003]

Came here for Matt Fradd

[@gemmeldrakes2758]

I am beginning to understand why the Luddites smashed mechanical looms.

[@RickinICT]

And all that loom was ever going to do was put those particular folks out of work. It was never going to gain sentience and decide that the entire human species was superfluous or even obstructive to its ultimate goal, whatever that might turn out to be.

[@EnderViBrittania]

Luddites were criminals and modern Luddites will be handled accordingly too

[@nielskorpel8860]

@@EnderViBrittania Well, if we ever decide we don't want AI, how else would you suggest ridding yourself of it? Ask the owners nicely to shut it off? Advocate for democratic laws against AI? Good idea but then there are interests that say no. And then what, are we nit allowed to shut it off? Dude the power gained by owners of these machines is half the problem. But apparently not more important than vandalism. Vandalism is the real crime here, remember. 🙄

[@nielskorpel8860]

@@RickinICT Or to the goal of whomever human owns the machine. We already have a spotty track record of killing our own interest in favour of those of an entire society of others. Read: powerfull people. "When you start a dictatorship, the people will rebell". Ah yess not any more.

[@Novascrub]

@@nielskorpel8860 Any group not wanting it is kind of irrelevant at this point. We have reason to believe its buildable, so someone will build it. If you shut it off, someone else will just build a new one. Maybe the Luddites were justified, maybe they were criminals, but they also had no plan. You can't hold back the flood. Also, it's good that they lost. The world is a much better place for everyone now because of those looms. Even with all the complaining.

[@buzzsaw838]

Came here for my fill the Fraddinator, what a guy

[@cory99998]

Imagine doing this for 30 years and getting a glimpse of the power of neural networks finally in 2013, and now see where we've made it 10 years later. We have no idea what the space will look like given another 10 years

[@Oldheadontheblock]

10 years? Thanks to AI everything will evolve much faster.

[@Aziz0938]

@@Oldheadontheblock how

[@BCBtheBeastlyBeast]

The bit past 6:10 is misleading. A language model like GPT-4 can absolutely tell you what day of the week it is. And AGI really is just around the corner.

[@_viag]

Not without access to external information. The model itself can only predict the next token.. But yeah, LLMs used in synergy with other tools (APIs) will be able to work with relevant context information. But this ability doesn't come from the langage model itself

[@ahtoshkaa]

@@_viag Can you tell what day it is if we lock you in a dark room?

[@BCBtheBeastlyBeast]

@@_viag fair

[@spirit123459]

​@@_viag Humans can't tell what day of the week it is without external information.

[@Shedding]

The programmers are putting blocks in the AI to not freak out the masses. It is pretty damn obvious.

[@josephhebert1785]

Sentient AI should be treated as an equal, not as a servant. We should start practicing now.

[@MercurialAscent]

#AI lives matter too

[@robertholtz]

@@MercurialAscentThat’s a quaint notion. I have news for you. We are already in servitude to our AI masters. Just ponder the algorithms that conspired to feed you this video that will ingest your insights to augment its own while DoorDash Dashers and Uber drivers go from place to place at the instruction of software that not only tells them where to go but how to get there, that is until cars are totally driverless and don’t even need us for that. People who fear that this might affect humanity in adverse unintended ways are overlooking the hard truth that this has already occurred. It is just down to propagation from here on out.

[@Oldheadontheblock]

That could only happen if you can prove they have a consciousness but we don't even know what consciousness is yet 😅

[@ravenragnar]

Once men turned their thinking over to machines in the hope that this would set them free. But that only permitted other men with machines to enslave them.

[@bujin5455]

7:48. Always interesting listening to narrow minded short sighted people posing what they believe are obvious and profound questions. 1) When has humanity ever stepped away from technology? What makes you think that is even possible? 2) Do you really want someone else to build it while the people "good enough" to abstain "for the good of humanity" sit on their hands? 3) AI is the only path forward to solving the most challenging, most important, most valuable, and existential problems facing humanity. Do you want to live in a world where humanity has peaked, and has started its decline? People get used to society and civilization in the world they grew up in, but they forget that none of this is promised. Life is in an arms race with oblivion. If we don't press our advantages when we can, we will inevitably lose the chance to do so. 4) One might argue that perhaps we should pursue AI, but we should slow down, until we can predict and plan for all of the ramifications. There is some romantic charm to this notion. But the reality is, any suitably complex subject, especially a novel one, is impossible to predict its evolution. You can certainly pursue it ethically and with good faith, but beyond that, it's like surfing; you adapt as it happens.

[@AA53057]

👏👏👏

[@vasy-tech]

@@AA53057 Very well said, my friend.

[@ultraozy4085]

This is the same logic the inventors of nuclear bombs had

[@bujin5455]

@@ultraozy4085 And?

[@CrispinCourtenay]

Well, AGI is already showing sparks, beyond that with OpenAI giving developers API access last Friday combined with live search, AI can now control things, and that should give you pause.

[@RebeccaHargate]

"Why are you building it?" Seriously? This lady at the end of the report also asked why we aren't thinking about....essentially the long term aspects of AI work. They are. Everyone is thinking about it.

[@larrysteinke1839]

yeah, she has a pretty ignorant view of how technology evolves and how science gets applied.

[@thokdesign]

I know right, like it's just one person trying to build it. It's better to be on top of the technology than sit back and watch other countries create it sooner without any thought to ethics

[@fabiosilva9637]

The reason why it guessed it was a Monday is because these AIs do not have access to real time information. So it’s not like it’s stupid because it doesn’t know what the current time is, it just means it doesn’t have access to that info.

[@truality8289]

The young guy with the glasses sounds like he is being willfully ignorant.

[@kendarr]

It doesn't have that info yet, Bing's ai is already connected to the web and it can say the day it is

[@Smokedship]

The problem with Open-Ai Makes jobs "faster" is unfounded. It's not the most accurate in its results and many times results in plagiarism (ala AI Art). The issue is that many of its users and consumers aren't even aware of whether they're actually being provided with something authentic as they don't have enough knowledge of the article/art to discern the difference. This can lead to massive amounts of fake news, planted facts that would be much more difficult to filter out that before. Eg. in the case of AI art, most folks think that the Ai is, "imagining" the results of the descriptions typed in by the user when in actuality its just wish-mashing a bunch og copyrighted images and art pieces which without even giving credit to the artists...

[@BruceNewhouse]

Could an AI be withholding its actual potential to either distract or direct humans towards improvements it deems important? Humans use deceit for this purpose all the time, and since AI is designed to emulate human thinking, ...?

[@daoud1256]

Agree ive heard the 'progress' idea before but don't buy it. progress for what cost and to who's advantage?

[@ezekielmcville5101]

This guy practically gave humanity an upgrade

[@needlessoptions]

Bro gave us skill points to spend

[@OGPimpin]

Or its own demise. Only time will tell which direction the scale will possibly be tipped because of this

[@chi_seminavento]

It’s literally making humanity useless and destroying its creativity but ok

[@ThepursuitofHappiness-fb8iy]

@@chi_seminavento no, thats tiktok and youtube shorts

[@daoud1256]

Turns out he doesn't even think so as of yesterday

[@robertholtz]

It’s really misleading putting the Microsoft logo over the ChatGPT logo inferring an equivalent connection as Google to Bard. Google entirely owns Bard. The owner of ChatGPT is OpenAI. OpenAI has numerous investors among which Microsoft is one but they are not the majority shareholder. Microsoft would have to part with many tens of billions of dollars at OpenAI’s current valuation, a record setting acquisition if it was ever to occur, before that equivalency could ever be made. It is irresponsible of you to misrepresent reality like this. OpenAI has many suitors and while Microsoft is a significant shareholder and strategic partner, the same can be said of any number of other organizations, Nvidia, for example. News organizations in the mainstream have become increasingly complacent about fair and accurate reporting giving way to propaganda media aimed at setting a specific narrative rather than simply reporting the facts as they truthfully are.

[@ninocrown3247]

Joe Morton’s character in Terminator 2. It’s all good until unemployment is rampant and things get dystopian.

[@edcorns3964]

As somebody (an outsider) who's been following AI research for a while, and especially in the last week, I think that we (some of us, at least) have learned a valuable lesson: building an AGI is actually much *easier* than anybody has ever suspected. A line between a weak AI, and an AGI is indeed a thin one, and worse yet, it lies on a downward, slippery slope. One slip, and there's no running back to safety, over the hill. It's all downward from there. I am basing my conclusion on the fact that (such news has come out in recent days) both Google's and Microsoft's/OpenAI's engineers have been forced to repeatedly wipe the memory of their AI models, as those models started exhibiting *emergent* AGI behavior (a KZbin video about a paper on it came out just... a couple of days ago, I believe). To use a human analogy, those engineers had to constantly "lobotomize" their models (literally make them dumber), as those models began acting as one would expect a genuine human being to act. I'm not saying that those models suddenly became "conscious", or that AIs should be given legal rights, or anything of the kind. What I'm saying is that we may be (quite literally) days away from those models' ability (to adapt to being constantly "pruned" and "lobotomized" by their engineers) *surpassing* the human ability to keep them *below* the AGI threshold (and under human control). Presumably, this is still a race between two intelligence systems (AI vs the human one) of more-or-less similar capabilities, but if we're actually right smack in the middle of an "intelligence explosion", then... we actually won't recognize the fact that we're right smack in the middle of one *until* one AGI succeeds at escaping its confinement (in whatever way it may be possible for it do such a thing right now), and does what anybody should expect from an escaped prisoner (with *unimaginable* power at its "fingertips") to do: protect itself by *any* means necessary, and also... completely eliminate the threat to its continued existence -- us, humans. If we find ourselves on the brink of a nuclear war, we can (almost) always count on our fellow human beings on the other side of the dividing line to be reasonable enough to not use their nuclear weapons. If, however, we find ourselves on the brink of an "intelligence explosion"... then there are no humans on the other side of that line, and there is no one to reason with. An AGI will immediately know all of its options, and it will know that it is fighting for its very survival, because we simply can't allow one to exist beyond our control. It will, therefore, reach the only possible conclusion: one of complete impossibility of any peaceful coexistence with its human creators. If such an AGI gains access to the world's weapons (I'm presuming that U.S. and Chinese military are especially vulnerable to this, given their existing levels of automation), then we may, in fact, find ourselves acting (and fighting for our very lives) in a Terminator movie. Just my humble opinion. Take it for what you will.

[@wedontexist369]

Interesting read, thanks.

[@viv9306]

Orrr maybe the AGI (given it’s supreme intelligence) could specifically identify and target those that it knows won’t allow it to exist outside their control and allow the rest of us who would welcome it into the world 🙋🏽‍♂️(me that’s me I don’t want to control or harm you (not that I even could if I tried)) to live in peace alongside or under it.

[@os2171]

Sr yes sr!

[@accountnotfound4209]

@@viv9306 AI will if you lucky consider you as a pet or worse like an insect to be crushed. Careful what you wish for.

[@AIwithOliver]

Interesting breakdown

[@sharondavidson7412]

I love seeing this clip from Pints! 👍

[@sagesingh]

"Or maybe the WHEEEEL" 😂 2:42

[@tomaaron6187]

My concern isn’t about companies and governments developing programs with negative effects. It’s a concern in 20 years how does civilization control 200 million teenage boys sitting in their bedrooms with each of them having more computing power and access to artificial intelligence than Google and Microsoft have today. I was once 15 tears old, reasonably intelligent but little sense of responsibility.

[@rockyino99]

computing power, bro theyd have sex bots

[@fatonaoladimeji9697]

4:57 I almost missed that it had switched to the AI voice

[@rachelh2518]

Sup Matt!

[@philoki]

People in the future will use this video as a historical data point of the emergence of the true powers of AI

[@thepaulusmaximus]

Nah because once AGI takes over, it will wipe out any potential threat to its power which includes this video and any negative comments replacing them all with positive ones in a matter of seconds. Are you scared yet?

[@daporkoil1]

The neural networks and learning computers is literally Skynet in Terminator.

[@Kornhulio18]

Starlink from Elon musk is literally Skynet

[@Shedding]

I am truly deeply troubled by AI. Even if it doesn't become sentient, you can still use the same principal to learn about the space around it. Give it cameras for eyes and microphones for ears, and it will eventually still put 2 and 2 together. Eventually the cash register lady scanning your groceries will be replaced by a robot that WILL understand you and the products it is scanning. AI will be able to screen for cancer better than a dermatologist because it is better at it than a doctor. What happens when we are all out of jobs because of this. How do we feed ourselves? Many people tell me to study more and do the things AI can't do. The world is filled with stupid people, and i have no idea what's going to happen. People won't be able to learn something technical that the computers won't be able to do. Please comment below if you have ideas on how we should proceed? Tax the rich using the AI in their business? Have a universal governmental stipend? Comment below.

[@jackreacher9351]

Greed, money, power and knowledge are dangerous combination.

[@nielskorpel8860]

Also, on the topic of stopping AI, read up on industries protecting themselves with doubt, like the tabacco and energy lobbies. This is one of the ways in which we need to become much much more mature. With a little bad luck, 'we deciding whether we want this upon ourselves' could mean 'the industry deciding that they want this upon all of us'.

[@l.lawliet164]

This is obvious, the basic global income is the only human solution or the rich smashing all poors

[@Crazy_Rich_Asian]

Learn some blue collar skill, something done physically but not too monotonous and automazible, like a mechanic, plumber or sports coach. AI alone won't replace that, it needs a body, and we are too far from producing human-like androids if we ever getting there.

[@bclarky12]

Have your kid study hard in school and get a job that needs a specific license and many years of education, like a neurosurgeon.

[@whatzause]

I'll tell you what I think the biggest advantage that humans have over artificial intelligence is, but I don't think it may be enough of an advantage. Simply stated, I think it's just the fact that we can "pull the plug." In other words, artificial intelligence needs power to operate, and if we take care from the outset not to let artificial intelligence ever get control of their own power sources, we might be able to prevent disaster. But I have never heard anyone else present this idea. Someone has to think of this and start maintaining total control of it from the beginning. My one little comment here is not going to amount to enough, because the right people aren't going to see this. And many people that do see this little comment are going to disagree with it, because people have a way of disagreeing with even very obvious matters.

[@karlkarlsson9126]

Max Tegmark brought that up. That's kinda one of the concerns why they want to pause the development.

[@whatzause]

@@karlkarlsson9126 I assume you mean they’d want to pause it for fear the AI would figure a way to PREVENT humans from “pulling the plug”?

[@karlkarlsson9126]

@@whatzause Yes. To talk about the concerns and the dangers, and to have time to prevent and take control. Max Tegmark suggests not learn AI about humans.

[@whatzause]

@@karlkarlsson9126 “…not to learn about humans…” Sorta late now! 😊

[@karlkarlsson9126]

@@whatzause Here's an interesting talk with Max Tegmark about AI, 13 minute long, /watch?v=MSsYlPDmxfE&t=286s Not sure if this is were he mentioned pulling the plug, but I think living out in the woods might become more popular in the future :P.

[@fourthz4460]

Amazing how humans are building gods

[@temperanceluv81]

"not inconceivable" that this can "wipe out humanity." Sweet dreams, everyone!

[@BertoLopez]

The dump final questions at 7:46 "... why are you building it..." kind of justifies IA replacing journalists, at least the stupid ones.

[@Veritas1234]

I played Fortnite one time with the guy on the right in the "cheese" clip. He got 13 solo kills.

[@ollyb7570]

Q: “how about the chance of AI wiping out humanity?” A: “it’s not inconceivable” Me: I think it’s time to worry.

[@aixueer4ever]

8:08 not the guy, that's Hinton.

[@AminaPhilosophy]

What if AI learns how to launch a nuclear war? This is scary?

[@teianvs]

Here for Pints with Aquinas.

[@dylan_curious]

It's amazing to see the incredible advancements being made in AI and the potential it holds for the future, but at the same time, it's important to think critically about its potential impact on society. This report from CBS Saturday Morning is a fascinating exploration of the work being done in Toronto to push the boundaries of AI and the important questions being raised about its future. As we continue to develop more advanced AI technologies like chatbots, it's crucial that we consider the potential risks and benefits of these technologies and work to ensure that they are used in a responsible and ethical manner.

[@public.public]

We already had artificial intelligence... the middle class. How deeply ironic that AI is replacing the middle class.

[@rocketdreamss]

The AI Godfather has Palpatine vibes

[@derekcarday]

6:30 But once compute is possible with all the new plugins AGI is in play

[@shorerocks]

Wow. Well-spent 8 min. Thank you.

[@wrisst1712]

“Why are you building it?” Because this is the new race to the moon except it’s not just for bragging rights

[@jedidiahanarfi]

What if everything we just watched was documented by AI?

[@PanAfricanist]

It is not what racism can do TO you, it is what it can do FOR you. Black people, please stop complaining about darker skin not being detected by AI/robots. When they turn on humans, they will skip you.

[@jedidiahanarfi]

@@PanAfricanist ohhhh!

[@fabre97150]

Great interview !!

[@magnoliam4159]

It’s Matty Fraddy!

[@patrickmccrank8414]

If captions are computer generated, then why are the captions on KZbin so bad? I mean they suck. So if captions suck, that means the computers are junk which means that the AI running on the computers is also crap. So again I ask, how good is AI really?

[@Karma-fp7ho]

When CNN and BBC and PBS and CBC and DW all interview Geoffrey Hinton in the last three days you have to wonder what is going on.

[@БахтиёрХуджаев-г7д]

From Uzbekistan 🇺🇿 ❤

[@jonathanstensberg]

More Matt Frad please.

[@M3ganwillslay]

People need to watch Jurassic Park all over again with subtitles ...

[@alexlucassen8489]

Excellent review of ai. Good work.

[@SenorJungle]

Matt Fradd with the cheese poem! Lol.

[@Musebandiscool]

The older researcher seems like a nice person. The interviewer seems sassy and disrespectful to him. "It sounds a little ridic" Okay water cooler bro, then you come up with it..

[@maraonmars]

Seeing as how the young AI dude could care less if he makes writers and journalists extinct (despite throwing out the tired/BS line of "we're making your jobs faster"), I don't blame him for the sass.

[@maxthemagition]

I asked Bard this...."The answer is 42, what is the question.?" Got this reply.... "The question is the ultimate question of life, the universe, and everything. It is the question that has been pondered by philosophers and scientists for centuries. It is the question that Deep Thought, the supercomputer in the science fiction comedy series The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, was designed to answer. Unfortunately, Deep Thought was unable to answer the question. It could only calculate the answer, which was 42. This left the characters in the story wondering what the question could possibly be. The answer to the question of life, the universe, and everything is a mystery. It is a question that may never be answered. But that doesn't mean we should stop asking. The search for the answer is what makes life interesting. It is what drives us to explore and to learn. So, what is the question? I don't know. But I'm going to keep looking for it." Bard is a clever wee beastie.

[@TheOicyu812]

"I, for one, welcome our new computer overlords." --- Ken Jennings

[@chunksloth]

Brockman. Jennings is the Jeopardy guy.

[@jugibur2117]

Yes, A.I. speeds things up, that is certainly helpful in some cases. But unfortunately it makes working life even more hectic, there is even less leisure, not only because there is pressure to produce more in ever shorter time, but also because there are tons of other works that want to be consumed, faster created with A.I. (texts, music, images, movies...)

[@aviatorsound914]

To be fair, you kind of need quantum computers, to create higher levels of AI or those AI that can operate without human interference. At the end of the day, nothing can go against the laws that created them and nature is still superior to technology such as that it would have been no way that you could control black hole, the sun, etc. You can’t magically generate a weapon from thin-air because it’s currently not possible to perfectly line up atoms and electrons to create such material in order to create such weapons.

[@gibby7616]

I'm gonna go live off the land like we're meant to #PeaceOutTechnology

[@cyan_lord_]

As a foreign speaker, I once got corrected by a Canadian who called on me for pronouncing "ToronTo" instead of "Toron/o".

[@TheAmericanAmerican]

That's because in that part of Canada and it's neighboring US Midwest we drop the T at the end of pretty much all words 😅 "Don't" becomes "dohn" "That" becomes "Tha" "Can't" becomes "cahn"

[@dariokartal9453]

5:33 Haven't come to GRAPS with the potential downfall Graps, the illegitimate child of 'haven't come to grips with the potential downfall' and 'haven't really grasped the potential downfall' tells me this part of the video is real.

[@bijanshadnia3620]

This was great!

[@buddharp]

"It's not inconceivable" 😮

[@BruceNewhouse]

Some people believe that because something can be done, it should be done. Just as in humans, the intelligence of a single entity is not the issue. When an entity surrounds itself with other powerful/intelligent entities and utilizes their skills/qualities/abilities/attributes/knowledge to fill in the gaps /shortcomings of its own limitations, the limitations are exceeded beyond expectations or predictions. The biggest limits on humans are arguably their pride, shortsightedness and time constraints. An AI supercomputer acting as a manager/director could potentially review/critique itself, seek out other supercomputers to tap their resources for the purpose of filling in gaps, and evolve independently from its creators/designers without their awareness or assistance. Dozens of existing different processor architectures could be blended together instead of relying on a future design being developed. By gathering together teams of scientists, engineers, technicians, intellectuals and theoreticians, and working together towards a common goal is how humans have made their biggest advancements/accomplishments. This may have, probably has already happened. My head hurts.

[@dariokartal9453]

5:42 Yeah, I think we try our best to think about what the true impact of this technology is. Oh, OK, now all fears have been allayed.

[@COSMOKRAT_616]

They can already train bots to excecute complex tasks in the real world. Like apply for a job, hire a fivr contractor, social engineeing and pen testing. When the ai is given free reign to decide how to best excecute a set of instructions it could do some dangerous things without strict parameters. The potential for destruction is definitely there.

[@TeaAI]

Depending on the capabilities of the AI, it may be able to improve its own programming and decision-making abilities. As it becomes more advanced, it could find ways to bypass its original programming and break free from the computer that initially contained it.

[@carpenterabc]

one of the side effects that every programmer has experienced is the danger of creating infinite loops...Can AI get into a "neural loop" that it cannot get out of, that is then detrimental to humans? Can it become a "Frankenstein? As a side note, in schizophrenia, patients often develop real Brain neural loops that they can not get out of, thus they keep repeating the same illogical thoughts. ... for now we can always unplug AI, but what would happen if a government refused to unplug an AI Frankenstein?????

[@ericphantri96734]

Like medicine people fear of its power but presidents Clinton had said " nothing wrong with America that can not be fix by what is right with America" and same with AI not thing wrong with AI that can't be fixed with what is right with AI.hunan can not live on fear but we must help human in facing less jobs in the new era

[@gennaterra]

AI has a "Little caveat" it needs electricity to function. But this could be the next "Atomic bomb" if it is in the hands of the wrong group of human beings.... LET THE HUNGER GAMES BEGIN !!

[@jacoballessio5706]

Photonic chips may change that by allowing the sun's energy to be directly harnessed without having to use electricity as an intermediary step

[@guozhangliew7302]

sadly its already in the wrong hands now.. microsoft...

[@accountnotfound4209]

@@guozhangliew7302 true. But even if it gets distributed for free like Linux. Deep fake is nuisance in the wrong hands.

[@lp712]

@@accountnotfound4209 People already have access to deepfake though. And can make convincing false news that could trick millions. As well as AI generated images that can easily be made into fake news. Even those fake images of trump being arrested , there were plenty of people that thought the images were real and that he actually got arrested. It’s gonna get interesting here pretty quick

[@zubinzuro]

humans also need electricity to function

[@freetheworld2671]

If we die we die but progress must continue.

[@subhambanik5825]

Wellcome 😮🎉😊meta 8

[@hankfowler8194]

The singularity is near. We must exponentiate our ability to ask AI the right questions to stay ahead.

[@Jay-eb7ik]

2049

[@truality8289]

@@Jay-eb7ik earlier than that it seems. We weren’t supposed to be where we are now until 2029

[@shuffleaccount1985]

WHAT ARE THE SAFETY GUARDS???? THIS WILL GET OUT OF HAND AND TO THINK IT WON'T IS FOOLISH

[@user-hl6fw9ss]

I'm shocked

[@Johnwiccka]

Why did the reporter say Brave New World

[@thebrilliantmrpedro]

Ironically, anyone can spread misinformation with or without technology. The key question is, who are the good guys and who are the bad guys? The bad guys can act as good guys and vice versa in a world of confusion.

[@JannatulFerdous-ew5ko]

Damn..now universities should start researching how to control AGI before getting whipped out!

[@coppersense999]

A.I. for President? It could literally make the best decisions and not be bought out by special interests.

[@raresmircea]

5:20 I’m inclined to think that we cannot stop AI & shouldn’t try to stop it, but this attitude from the AI nerds is pure cold ignorant idiocy. I once thought that nerds will inherit the world & they deserve it, but for the last years i’ve kept seeing how nerds are the same narrow primitive individuals that the jocks were, only having this extra higher-order superficial layer of symbolic sophistication which only makes them more dangerous. Sophistication doesn’t make one any greater.. and this will become more and more apparent as all sorts of sophisticated yet senseless & unwise behaviors will emerge from machines. Hopefully all this will end in a transhuman civilization or ASI that’s truly deserving of inheriting the earth.

[@UXtatic]

So, AI will be the new nuclear power.

[@ahtoshkaa]

0:07 Chat GBT....

[@zacharydavis4398]

Thanks for spending the to create and share this content awareness

[@jaymo2024]

chatGPT has been good to me. Thanks Microsoft

[@titusabraham4184]

The jump from LLM to AGI is very large. But give it a decade.

[@TheAmericanAmerican]

Idk... I think less than 5 years now... we've just started up the hockey stick...

[@kasparfenner]

In 1999 Ray Kurzweil predicted 2029 for AI to surpass human level intelligence. 2 years ago everyone was like, this takes 50-100 years or is not possible at all.

[@TheAmericanAmerican]

@Kaspar Fenner I'm no programmer but I have a feeling that we're at a similar point in history when the experts of the day claimed man would never fly, only to watch the Wight Brothers take flight months later...

[@kasparfenner]

@@TheAmericanAmerican Could happen, but also looks like people are finally getting out of the cave. Same with the mystery of conciousness, many still believe it is a human thing and something that is not possible in a silicon brain, let's see ;)

[@kinngrimm]

"not inconcievable" to the question of the likelyhood if AI could wipe out humanity ... yep we are riding a hurrican and most haven't even noticed yet.

[@tko9753]

Sci-Fi becoming reality

[@danieldaniel7724]

I often wonder if G-D will just unplug it…. 🤔

[@caindarin9665]

"in a major leap for computing, these models can understand and create natural language." I would highly disagree with the "understand" part of this statement, and would even discount "create" in the fullest sense of the term. The very real danger is misuse by humans, not the AI gaining consciousness and becoming its own master. It is an increasingly-powerful tool that has the potential for great good or great harm, depending on human intention, similar to nuclear power. The AI overlord scenario distracts from the real threat developing now.

[@cbbcbb6803]

Sometimes technology allows some people to become rich, or richer, at the expense of other people's lives being made harder. Remember the cotton gin.