Google I/O 2011: HTML5 versus Android: Apps or Web for Mobile Development?

[@RickBeacham]

Yes i see what you are saying. Unity3d can provide a great user experience but html5 is accessible to much more platforms and you can write apps much easier. Unity3d also has other technologies that compete with it such as Gamebryo and even openGL ES. The amount of energy developing for Unity apps for specific solutions is also higher. I really like Unity3d but i think a more compelling idea would be to intergrate html5 into unity game engine. YOu can request CGI programs in unity i think.

[@LuigiAgosti]

I think Gwt with html5 is the solution to pursue Falling back to native in case is too bad from a user prospective thanks to Reto and Michael, awesome talk

[@Anders01]

Android and iOS development is excellent as a forerunner for HTML5. And maybe that's why Google launched Android in the first place. But still, it's actually like old PC software to have to install and upgrade applications on different OSs. Notice that they conveniently skipped that part in the presentation. ;-)

[@ProBloggerWorld]

13 years later and I think we must say, it still depends on the use case. I lean towards a native hybrid approach, so main functionality is native, augmented by web views. Kudos to Google for having us since forever. 🎉

[@marecektn]

all Google IO talks are just ASTONISHING! If only I had 120 hours of free time full of concentration :)

[@xxwoman]

I wish this channel was available on ROKU! :D

[@Riofriosful]

$("#section") refers to an element with id "section". However, the slide refers to an element with _tag name_ "section".

[@RickBeacham]

Good point. How much energy is used to develop an app on one platform compared to another platform. If you look at Game Development on consoles it can take significantly longer while a flash based one is much shorter. But is the end user experience that same? No. The console is usually better. But in the case with flash it can do the same thing but with less energy in development. So it really depends on your target audience. Flash is great solution but not for all users.

[@RickBeacham]

I use some apps only through the browser since they don't need access to my phones data. But i would rather use the native apps. How can the acccess rights be restricted on a 'as needed bases' during of which we could grant access to the native app for each request. I wonder if there is a google maps api for c and C++?? Good presentation.

[@VEGETADTX]

No man, I didn't say there should be only one food to eat, only one thought in everybody's mind, only taste etc. Those things should stay diverse logically...as a matter of fact the more diverse food the healthier one is. But when it comes to programming there is not a single benefit of having bunches and bunches of different languages, and bunches of different pipelines that utilize those languages in bunches of different ways COMPLETELY UNNECESSARILY, making it just harder for all of us.

[@SpectatorAlius]

@sleepysonic Sounds like a feature to add to HTML5 video support: closed captioning!

[@rizchelsea6440]

Good debate.Got lot information from your discussion.

[@SurachetMonchawanon]

for the slide should be $("section") , I think .. for html tag selector

[@Ciprian-Amarandei]

I wish Google develops a wrapper for html5 to run as a native android app just like cocoonJS does. I like cocoonJS for fast performance, but you cannot access system functions and services with that.

[@dudds6699]

it really depends on what you want to do. basic apps ie storing info and what not html5 no excuse. high intense graphic applications with opengl and what not native.

[@MohamedElsaka91]

Great, But can we calla native java functions from HTML5 application? I think this may be applicable if android supports local server that we can relay on! and ideas ?

[@dmg46664]

GWT was the real unsung hero in this talk! :-)

[@Ou8y2k2]

When it comes to software, I'm an early adopter. I'm using Chrome 20.0.1096.1 dev-m and it apparently randomly puts some users in the HTML5 KZbin beta program. I went to the KZbin HTML5 page and opted out. Now I can view videos without stuttering on my Athlon XP using Flash 11.2. Perhaps they should query whether a computer is dual core or higher?

[@ThomasHauck]

Michael Mahemoff is the author of Ajax Design Patterns.

[@lnostdal]

It's happening. see NaCL ("Google Native Client"); it will run on ARM and mixes with HTML5.

[@bichitomax]

Remenber, we are talking about web development, aren't we? Don't compare apples with orange, Unity 3d have it way in game development as html5 in the web , flash have his nich in animation carttons and 2d/3d games. There are a tons of concept that you need to learn or experience before came to the conclusion about how thing should be done, remember that the only real programing language in html5 is javascript and with it you can make a whole game without any css and only one canvas html element.

[@VEGETADTX]

Recognizing perspective in something doesn't make me childish, it just makes me someone who cares about the future. I don't understand why do you think of it as something as day dreaming or "sci fi" or such. It is real, it is absolutely possible, there is not a SINGLE THING that stops people from making something like that besides their unwillingness to do so.

[@darthirakli]

Yeah, I was wondering about Chrome choosing html5 on some videos as well. Do you know if this is a bug or an intentional feature (to test youtube's html5)?

[@bichitomax]

I care about the future too, and sometimes i aks myself questions like yours: Would the world solve its problem if there were only a unified institution(country or continent) ,if there were only one absolute concurrency , is everyone think the same, only one food to eat, only one game too play, only one dream to accomplish,A ONLY LANGUAGE,etc. It would be boring don't you think? But more i care about is the now, and that is a higher scope subject and i would get too tired to talk about it.Cheers

[@Anders01]

Awesome presentation! I have only watched a bit so far but I just wanted to point out that having to install software on different OSs (like on Android and iOS) is sooo 90s!!! Why not make HTML5 fully mobile-able?

[@bichitomax]

But did you forget what programing language are?. The technologies and it can also be applayed to what i say earlier (Do you realy want a world with a single technolgy) also remenber that there are something called "style" and people choose the language base in which style they want to code that fit they peculiar criteria. There are functional languages OOP langauges , prototypical oriented language( JS by example),etc.

[@OwenPrescott]

How come they cannot just combine the web standards of html5 with the native tech?

[@VEGETADTX]

Yes but my point is that all of that html css js and all of those unnecessary complications should be shrunk into one darn simple purely visual language and make our lives easier. The only people on earth who made a step in that direction are Unity3D team...it is only a game engine for now, but I stronly believe that it will become a multipurpose programming environment in the future...I don't understand why people don't recognize it more and invest in it more.

[@waqqas_the_wicked]

I believe the syntax is fairly similar though I would encourage you to look in to jQuery if you haven't done so already :) JS can be a pain!

[@oneminutetomidnight]

@sleepysonic CC is working for me. Try again maybe? ;p

[@getreadytotube]

Are these two battling each other? Is it like one is for HTML5 and one if for Native?

[@bichitomax]

Well remember what html5 realy is(html,css3,js) so you could use CSS to do .button:hover{"do something} and voula and also keep in mind that: Not everyone want to use or afford a expensive graphical tool just to make a website or app. And website and apps make in flash cannot be track by search engines like google, yahoo and bin and SEO is critical for any web business. I not saying that flash is a bad tool but for web development unless is video related it is.

[@bichitomax]

Well i think it maybe because most of mayor modern browser support and are open source, and those need more open source solution and proposals like html5 in orden to get rid propetary/restrcited things like flash. And about the ugly syntax of JS (that is subjective), you my use something like coffeescript or clojurescript to make js a more staticly appeling language than even AS3, i also know about populars AS3 animation libraries like Greensock's that had ported to JS.

[@VEGETADTX]

But I was not talking about Action Script, I was talking about Flash editor. I just don't understand human kind....I will never understand...we have the ability to make a multipurpose, multiplatform, intuitive, easy to use, VISUAL programming environment (such as UDK's kismet but just multipurpose) yet NOBODY SO FAR HAS DONE IT. WHY PEOPLE DON'T CARE ABOUT IT!? That's like editing a video frame by frame with paint, and not caring about making video editors such as premiere/smoke/vegas...

[@burgalarab]

A no-brainer perhaps but the only thing I have been able to fully determine is that Adobe Flash is not the future and (in my case) firmly in "the can". Current thinking = Android apps and Webviews for the re-write. I need to watch this again later... Jury is still about a bit

[@bichitomax]

The are not "unnecassary complications" more complicate would be is i have to define my markup, style and functionality in the same language because , semantic markup(html) style(css) and the functionality (js) they are and have too different concepts in the game that need to be separate in an way to make applications more mantainable (have you heard about "progressive enhancement"?), so you realy need to give yourself a time to check how web development work and how html5 fit in that game.

[@RickBeacham]

Does that browser have access to the phone and device data anyways?

[@alkoxy]

do web view apps support the android intent framework?

[@goldilockszone4389]

I am noob and I want to get into software development- Should I start by learning app or should i learn the basic of web development. I feel that apps are taking over web development but not in the near future

[@httfan2345]

where I can download the presentation file ?

[@NotAllowed83]

great demo!

[@VEGETADTX]

I agree its all subjective of course when it comes to syntax..but man...honestly, how much coding and work you have to do to program a hover button effect in Javascript vs Flash...it is incomparably in Flash its just a matter of entering the "onhover keyframe and then doing whatever you want there, in JS you have to write .ready() .live('hover') function() {.... bla bla bla yet still graphically not be able to do a darn thing compared to what you can do with flash. So I just don't understand.

[@bichitomax]

Flash die on web development some time ago, now is more suitable for games, but still many mayor mobile game don't even use flash anymore.

[@webcamsociety]

Can the mobile interface be used to develop android?

[@Anders01]

As a funny little conspiracy theory, an additional reason for Android is to destroy Oracle. Haha. They tricked Oracle to buy Sun and then Oracle will sue Google again and win! And the market will get really angry at Oracle for destroying Android, while that was the plan all along.

[@forresto]

What's the TL;DW?

[@bichitomax]

Emmmm.. ok i tought that we were talking about something about flash and html5 , but CLEARLY you are tunred in something in some sci fi or anime would make, how old are again?.

[@rahulsawant9816]

this video is so good but its too long makes some people bore

[@bichitomax]

And remeber that "No programming language is perfect" and "You need to pick the right tool for the job" i am sure that you heard those sentences from many professional and great developers. If you are agree with it then how can you want a world wit only a programming language/tool there ? :).

[@VEGETADTX]

I know all of that...but I disagree that that's a better way of doing things...there is no way that having to know tons of stuff (out of which many are organized badly IMO) is easier than having to know how to use only ONE tool or language. Unity3D is a perfect example of that...I can't imagine that someone thinks that HTML5 and all it includes is easier than Unity3D, yet I bet Unity3D with its web player someday may become the next big thing.

[@GEORGEMEJIA]

well-understood

[@JamesJBurt]

Michael sounds almost apologetic every time he speaks. It detracts from his ability to convince. One thing I wish he had emphasized: HTML 5 has a huge advantage in the Human-Resources consideration. a. Your company probably already has developers who know 90% of HTML_5, the additional training (from HTML_4 to HTML_5) is relatively small. b. Whatever you wish that browsers could do, they will be able to do soon, probably long before you can retrain your developers to be experts in Native programming. Unless you really need your web-app to access the barometer / gps / contact_list / accelerometer on a user's phone, you probably don't really need native code.

[@TheNoih112]

Google uses JQuery?

[@fanno16]

why google developers using macbook?

[@digitalsketchguy]

This debate is already dated. That's technology for you! Two years old...wow!

[@stevenship]

good demo!

[@EvoPortal]

For anyone who does not want to waste almost 2 hours watching this video. To sum up....HTML 5 for apps SUCKS. Web Apps SUCK.

[@Sakitsunebi]

Im just going to interject against your statement towards web apps. I'm personally a fan of native code and I do prefer lower levels and trying to get as close to the machine as i can, BUT a web app is an EXCELLENT place to start with an application. Like they stated, it works everywhere and you can cover almost all of your basis in one shot. Now, of course there are cons, but the all your users are happy and you have a working application. Now that your web app is functional and stable, (which is a huge task in and of itself, if youve ever built one) you begin working on the native app(s). Not to mention that since youve already build the damn thing once, you have a better understanding of how all the bits and pieces work and hopefull you'll be aware of whatever pitfalls may have come through your first build. Not to mention you'll probably add and remove some features along the way. Also, during that time, collect data from your web app and determine what features are popular, useless and future features your users might want. And lastly, to say that HTML5 sucks for web apps is an unsophisticated, and probably uneducated statement. If you've ever made a web app or even a web page, you'll know that HTML5 doesnt make any kind of app, process information or handle any kind of logic. Also, Java, C/C++, JavaScript, jQuery, Python, PHP, Ruby etc..., the code that actually DOES handle logic, are all just a means to an end, and if you're wise, you'll consider whatever tool best suits your needs for the current situation instead of just blow something off. The guys at the conference said it so well, "If there was only one way that was best, google would only do it that one way, but we dont, we do it both ways."

[@EvoPortal]

Sakitsunebi You are simply scientifically incorrect.

[@Sakitsunebi]

Right.....

[@CGExp]

I wish I had 1 hr , to watch the whole thing

[@xzaz2]

6:48 like the 1,337 projects

[@bichitomax]

You and me are the same, we want to code in the language that fit our needs and coding style,maybe you like the syntax and concepts c++, python or AS3 and you wouldn't want to code in something else, and maybe i like javascript , php, or ruby and the same applay to me, that the beauty of having a plethora of things like programing languages (that we can choose from many what i like and make sence to me) you see?.Would you like a world were all or one single thing were a monopolio?..I won't.

[@gmarchildon]

in jquery, it's $("#section")

[@anynamecanbeuse]

the guys should improve their sliders

[@CGExp]

I wish I had 1:01:35 UNITS of time , to watch the whole thing

[@meridjal]

With people like these no wonder Android is not moving forward as fast as it should.

[@Riofriosful]

5:45 Javascript should be $("section") not $("#section"). :-)

[@rocwang9681]

great

[@VEGETADTX]

I never understood this irresistible urge of humankind to unnecessarily complicate things. Why can't Adobe simply make a contract with all major browsers and integrate flash player into them automatically and then make all of our lives easier. Creating drop down menus, animations, or anything else in flash is INCOMPARABLY easier, more intuitive, and more logical than anything ever done by Javascript IMHO. For my taste, JS has absolutely the ugliest syntax I have ever came across.

[@TheNedflix]

they have a macbook

[@manavpanchal8356]

Google is always new ... (Y)

[@jSKDkjsx]

Good

[@VEGETADTX]

No its not apples and oranges. I'm talking about a universal programming environment that will be applicable both to native and web programming. Both you and I know that at some point in future that must happen (otherwise I think that humanity is officially retarded). Back when all these powerful tools weren't made, as soon as you would mention an idea of it, people would reply - "stop daydreaming and work with what you've got now". Why doing the same now? Why underestimating the future?

[@87chacha]

billy mays!

[@cirantait]

Its jquery and its id selector!!

[@zrebrutibreniti]

last comment/question = epic

[@GEORGEMEJIA]

we should avoid learnign new programming languags, just learn one: html5

[@gmarchildon]

oh i see, my bad

[@lennyhome]

Write a program in HTML 5 and enjoy it running on several platforms... poorly. What a failure.

[@ChristopherElwell]

Speed 2.0x

[@boyo1991]

viva web apps! :P

[@xcelappcom]

This guy actually showed that BlackBerry is Java and ANDROID is "Dalvick" And when did "Dalvick" and HTML5 become a 'programming language? This video is embarassing Google. I guess he is one of your "Engineers"? lol Stick to search What a waste

[@pastorbijomjosephjoseph2535]

my official name is bijo mjoseph

[@LostNomad311]

So much talking for topics this simple (9 minutes in).

[@VEGETADTX]

But my question is WHY?!?!!? WHY!? Just why? If its more practical, faster, better anti-aliasing, simple to implement in browser and most importantly SIMPLER SOLUTION yet giving the same amount of flexibility WHY browsers don't implement flash instead of all this messy javascript and stuff... I just don't get it. Is it possible that the competition and greed is the only real obstacle? If it is, I don't even know what to say about humanity in general.

[@justinjiang]

macboook ftw

[@jedtech87]

That guy looks like a Bill Gates's disciple! hehehe, just kidding.

[@adsvancer]

builder

[@ziajunaidi2023]

web apps suck

[@CGExp]

I wish I had 1 hr , to watch the whole thing