Google Says It Appears to Have Accessed Parallel Universes with Quantum AI Chip but there's a Catch

[@typical-dad314]

Ok, but do we still have to go to work tomorrow?

[@AlphaOmegaSigma07]

Consult thy budget sheet. Without one you will go nowhere in life, or anything for that matter.

[@droptuned83]

No , not tomorrow.

[@typical-dad314]

@ Yay!

[@Alien_Bones]

@@AlphaOmegaSigma07 The sheet is order within the chaos...Light within the darkness... The sheet dictates, we execute. Long live the Main Server.

[@malcolmjcullen]

It's Christmas Day tomorrow - are you one of Santa's helpers?

[@new-bp6ix]

google still can't stop ads blocker

[@PruneHub]

No kidding. This is BS.

[@Moo-Fah-Sahh]

You don't want to stop ads blockers. You want to stop ads. Ads are annoying and not helping us.

[@PruneHub]

@@Moo-Fah-Sahh Hey, if you want to pay for YT premium you can go ad-free. Get rid of ads and YT/Google/everyone else is either pay to watch or they go under. Welcome to reality.

[@scj00380]

@@PruneHub But would this also occur in a parallel universe?

[@lemonhead9628]

@@PruneHubI'm not here for YT but the YTtubers back when it was created, no ads or any other bs just people creating content without seeing an ad every time I click on a video.

[@BoredThatsWhy]

We proved Parallel universe before GTA6.

[@OmegaMouse]

No, we proved Human stupidity before GTA1.

[@Alien_Bones]

Everything will come before GTA6...

[@Alien_Bones]

@@OmegaMouse Nope, that was the day no one believed that ''Idiocracy'' was actually a documentary on the near future and not a comedy in a far far away one....

[@OmegaMouse]

@@Alien_Bones Idiocracy is non-fiction, but not for the reasons outlined in the movie.

[@Alien_Bones]

@@OmegaMouse Pray tell...we are all ears and curiosity here, with such ominous words...

[@tiborvegh700]

I use my Pillow at night to go to the parallel universes.

[@Depther101]

What do you mean?

[@anxiety]

@@Depther101dreams

[@cryptojonny6837]

Maybe one day it might open the portal in the closet to the Narnia universe.

[@cryptojonny6837]

The 1984 Dreamscape movie had it to where the universe was in the dreams, so anything is possible.

[@tiborvegh700]

@@Depther101 Obviously I use Pillow instead of Willow 😅

[@TheRoninTezz]

You mean to tell me google can access parallel universes but can't verify that im me on a device I've used for years to access my email?

[@cracklespinner4802]

Because Your Google search engine isn't run off this quantum chip, braniac.

[@TheRoninTezz]

@ no shit… it was a joke. I get it if you cant comprehend those.

[@FlanmanBandz]

​@@TheRoninTezz obviously one of your parallel selves is attempting to hack into your account... occums razor!😮❤😂

[@Duckf33t]

@@cracklespinner4802🤓☝️

[@Iloveitjeremiah]

Problem is the the parallel universes are watching us, but we can’t watch them because googles privacy issues. 🤪

[@forbiddenruin]

Google will keep all the secrets and tell us "we cant share because you use an AdBlocker".

[@VivienGrand-Clément]

The concept of a multiverse, with its infinite possibilities, probabilities, and versions, suggests that everything might be happening simultaneously, just not in the same place, as some interpretations of string theory propose. This could mean that time does not exist in the linear way we perceive it. Consider this analogy: some animals cannot see certain colors because their brains lack the capacity to process them. Similarly, what if humans (and probably most living beings) cannot perceive time as it truly is? Perhaps time is circular rather than linear-a pattern beyond our sensory and cognitive reach. Ultimately, everything humans understand and experience is shaped-and constrained-by the limits of our physical forms. Our perception is bound by the mechanics of our “flesh,” leaving us unable to fully grasp the deeper nature of reality.

[@TheMrDarius]

I've thought about this the past few years. The multiverse is pretty plausible. I wouldn't be surprised if there is concrete evidence

[@karintankstelle8328]

So linear time would be a psychological perception bias?

[@YepTriedToTellYou]

This has nothing to do with google’s “quantum” cpu. Remember, the mat,eating term “quantum” in the case of a cpu has ZERO to do with quantum mechanics.

[@kerrodconnolly5338]

Yeah​@@karintankstelle8328

[@ivansultan1]

​@@TheMrDariusIn the marvel movie Dr strange it gives a speck of what might be infinite parallel universes....remember lots of things are first presented in fantasy movies

[@friesguy2403]

That went from computers to the expansion of the universe real quick

[@jonathanbell9349]

Googles thinking " Well they fell for NFT's and Bitcoin, they'll believe anything at this point"

[@supplyside2464]

Are you suggesting there is something faulty with Bitcoin people have missed?

[@thebaryonacousticoscillati5679]

South Park did a brilliant one on NFTs...

[@Thecinephile5]

​@@supplyside2464its more about crypto scams less about bitcoin

[@ericdunbar6230]

​@@supplyside2464You mean scamcoin. 😂😂

[@arewecrazyyet]

Most dollars are never printed. They sit as entries in the highly guarded computers in downtown New York. When you write checks or use your debit or credit card the electronic dollars are used to do the transactions. Bitcoin is a better currency. It is already used to transfer billions of dollars every day. This is why many countries are about to ditch the dollar since we kept having tax cut after tax cut and dug ourselves and the dollar into a ditch.

[@cyberpunked77]

Atoms are supercomputers. They are simulating us.😂

[@Balmung812]

Yep how does the atom know its made of gold. Something decid3d that atom is gold.

[@koalifix6501]

It's not much of a "something decided it" situation, but rather, provoked it. Decided implies cognition, and we don't know about that prime cause yet.

[@kbarbier4946]

​@@koalifix6501we got cognition so why not since we are made of same material

[@rrai1999]

​@@Balmung812 Gold is called Gold because we gave it a name. Human beings gave it a name. We decided that atoms made up of specifically 79 Protons, 118 neutrons, and 79 Electrons means that the atom is Gold. No unshakable property of the universe has bestowed any type of name or sentience or knowledge of itself on the atom. The way you approach this is so incredibly bizzare, maybe you need to visit a doctor who specialized in learning disabilities?

[@StrangeScaryNewEngland]

@@koalifix6501 Just think though that anything in existence is a provocation of atoms, so to have something so gargantuan in scale (the known universe) be able to orderly organize itself into trillions of different elements and objects and things, all with their own unique properties, that seems like it was programmed to do those things. I know that chance and odds on a universal scale for anything to happen are supposedly infinite, but at the same time it just seems impossible that it was all random chance. I don't believe in a big, bearded sky daddy named God, but that's just because all major religions make god as a cosmic man with superpowers, which I find ridiculous. I'd imagine "god" as more of a force/energy/all-encompassing-field, or rather the fabric and essence of reality itself.

[@ParalyticAngel]

From 6:39 (and exactly from 6:55). It's not because of bad technology that we can't see deeper into the universe, it's because we can't see further beyond a well-calculated radius (I remember it was about 50 billion light years) because from there The expansion of the universe is happening faster than the speed of light. We can practically never see this light. And the bad thing about it, also due to the expansion, is that we will be able to see less far into the distance tomorrow than we can today. With even more advanced technology, we will see less and less in the coming years than we do today.^^

[@TheErikaShow]

We can’t see deeper into the Universe because of *capitaism*, IMO.😐

[@rrai1999]

@@TheErikaShow Your opinion is uneducated, unwanted, and has no value.

[@magirktheone]

@@TheErikaShow ?

[@flowerdoyle3749]

Wouldn't answers from an alternate Universe make them Alternate Answers? Not necessarily viable in our present time line?

[@InAHollowTree]

Alternative facts! 😆

[@stuartfalconer913]

How do they even know that they got the correct answer?? If it takes so long to solve?? Just a marketing ploy in my eyes!

[@Alien_Bones]

''42''

[@shrikarchoudhary3142]

The process of verifying the answer is different than the process of getting the answer. I may not know how to make a key for a door, but I know how I can verify that its a key.

[@16bitRonald]

Good question, good answer

[@greyeyed123]

It might be the kind of problem where there are multiple ways of doing it, and they are asking the computer to do it the hard way. The humans can do it the easy way to verify the computer is doing it the long way and getting it right. (Or what the key guy said. Put in the key and see if it unlocks the door, metaphorically speaking.)

[@metcas]

It is possible to know the answer to a calculation through proofing. But to actually calculate it would take an immense amount of time.

[@nighteyes360]

Google has opened multi-dimensional portals with extraterrestrial beings invading earth with Quantum Giga AGI NVDIA turbo-GPUS, but there's a catch...

[@Urbanxx001]

UMM Exqueeze me but Microsoft’s Turbo-Fart chip did this years ago 🙄🙄

[@YepTriedToTellYou]

Google has hit its marketing quota on this bs.

[@joetrolo7076]

Yes, the catch is it creates plasmoid balls!😂😂😂

[@Obi-Zip]

This is literally the type of "sensational news" headlines i get in my google news feed 😂😂

[@krzysztofsawa2132]

"So fast that access parallel universes" This is wrong on so many levels

[@YOURMOMYURMUMMA]

Because the government can't stop at having capitalism and police brutality in JUST THE USA, it has to bring capitalism and police brutality TO THE MOON TO MARS AND TO OTHER DIMENSIONS?!?!? FUCK ME

[@SizzleMoonSong]

Prove it

[@krzysztofsawa2132]

@SizzleMoonSong you are not worthy

[@exoical4304]

He isn’t

[@panwasap7]

@@SizzleMoonSong What do you think you'd need to acces a whole other universe? That would be a breakthrough in science 1000 times greater than the discovery of fire. Dont let some chip with some fancy words play you fool, at best what it can do is process so fast it goes back in time but another universe? Nah

[@xXxPurplePillxXx]

My question is, how does Google knows the answer is correct ? They can claim whatever they want but can they prove the answer their Willow Chip gave is the correct one?

[@captainthunderbolt7541]

AI models could answer the question in the same time or less - and I'm sure the answer would be just as reliable! XD

[@supersayan6318]

@@xXxPurplePillxXx validating an answer doesn’t take the same amount of time as calculating it.

[@xXxPurplePillxXx]

@@supersayan6318 lol I highly doubt Google was able to validate anything. It was probably more of a PRmove for Google than anything else.

[@sahilsaksena3199]

Consider a Rubik's cube for example, easy to verify it is solved, very hard to solve it

[@Fel1sh4]

That was my question too. Maybe they started with knowing the correct answer, then they placed the question (for example breaking passwords) My next question: are they sure the computer solved the problem or it managed to access the answer itself somehow?

[@paulmahon1613]

Maybe we all just need some of Santa Claus's magic dust

[@Iloveitjeremiah]

@@paulmahon1613 yeah DMT is what it is called

[@YOURMOMYURMUMMA]

been there, done that, Here I am still.

[@SilverYPheonix]

What the hell was up with 2024 and people just being downbad for cocaine?

[@YOURMOMYURMUMMA]

@SilverYpheonix first of all, nobody said it was cocaine. Second of all, everyone has been “down bad for cocaine” since before you were born, it’s nothing new.

[@YOURMOMYURMUMMA]

@ what the hell is up with it? Nothing it’s all your perception.

[@everythingistaken5139]

ok but did it predict you were going to continue to post hyper sensationalized BS?

[@RoxieParadox]

🤣🤣💯

[@DaveyFraser]

lol, amazing

[@forbiddenruin]

Ouch. 🤣 I bet Googles Quantum Computer and Sentient AI couldnt predict you'd say that.

[@chrismasters1050]

Sounds like complete and utter bullshit.

[@Dini-jf5bt]

😂 yeah I was thinking the same thing

[@Excession-h6e]

Normally I despise bad language online. But this comment is 'king on point.

[@Alien_Bones]

@@Excession-h6e Don't you mean ''kinda''?

[@Excession-h6e]

@@Alien_Bones I was making fun of my own stolidness. The apostrophe stood in for 'Fuc'

[@Alien_Bones]

@@Excession-h6e Don't think that sort of wordplay works well on non English natives, like myself. We lack the cultural nuances and popular slangs and empirical information, for the majority.

[@gio957]

But can it cure cancer?

[@AndyRamirez-b5y]

You think that's the worst part of this all?? I'm losing hair follicles just thinking what can happen... This means death maybe coming to us all soon....

[@KevinLopez-jf5ys]

No, that will never happen.

[@Spartan11117777]

Only once Humans make contact with another Planet will the World Governments finally release their Cure For Cancer.

[@friesguy2403]

But can it run doom?

[@jaydee7548]

The AMA and Pentagon won't allow it too probably.

[@SmokeyJava]

It makes way more sense thinking along the lines of entanglement. I've spoken to the opposite Me, his name is Mark, and we work closely together when our fields are nearby. (Retraction and expansion of fields connected as with a rubber band.) * We can cross over only in Dream State.

[@jamiegaudet6008]

Is there a curriculum somewhere online or beginner source for someone to learn more about this kind of stuff?

[@BinBinBinko]

I guess look for something on quantum mechanics? That's really the basis for quantum computing.

[@benhoskins4719]

Imagine what Quantum error correction can do for civil engineering. A person could conduct scans of the subsurface for the foundations of a dam, levy, or bridge. Input information like traffic flow or water at flood stage and let the computer design the absolute optimum structure for any given location.

[@captainthunderbolt7541]

You can be first to test the structure. :)

[@Faceless_Chat]

@@captainthunderbolt7541 lol

[@berniebernal]

I would wish to be one of the first to test this. Since my brother and father are into civil engineering. My father is the civil engineer and brother is a lawyer but I am the computer science guy.

[@forbiddenruin]

but that kicks women out of STEM fields, Google cant let that happen ✊ for the cause.

[@MissiFull]

@@berniebernal CS is good too

[@SizzleMoonSong]

To all my small minded college professors that gave me failing grades for writing papers on this very subject 40 years ago ~ " I TOLD YOU SO !"

[@geokeyey1116]

Had same.problem at bu 1980 he was fresh yr science prof who chaired the astrophysics dept at Harvard. Forgor his name.but rmeebe big argument he said toriodals - latest gimmic in 80. Anyways I said out place.is a little bubble Ina huge foaming bubble bath like sponge Lol exact words boy we argued and he still knocked me down a grade

[@mikecharger1680]

"wrighting..??" 👎 "writing"👍

[@SizzleMoonSong]

@@mikecharger1680 doh. I musta been thinking about the Wright brothers or somesuch... Or maybe it was my atrocious spelling, and not my quantium theories that got me those failing grades 😆

[@arewecrazyyet]

Imagine that you could draw a living two dimensional person on a piece of paper. If they could move, they could only move in the horizontal direction or the vertical direction. They cannot move forwards or backwards off of the paper. This means up above the paper or below it. They are not familiar with space the way we are. They are stuck on the paper. The paper is their universe. A parallel universe is just another page to them. To them a multiverse is a book of pages. This book would have every possible two dimensional universe that could exist. This means every possible combination of two dimensional events that could ever happen. The book could be one page if that page was covered in ink. Speed is the relationship between the change of position and time. Neither two dimensional nor three dimensional beings can willingly travel through time. Somehow the computer has caused something to either freeze in time or go forward. This is just a guess before watching the video because I knew the comments would be wild.

[@snelson5871]

How do we know the answer to the calculation was right if it would take that long to solve?

[@southernscientist5439]

👀

[@8kelvin]

Verifying the correctness of results from quantum computers, especially for problems that would take classical computers billions of years to solve, is a significant challenge. Here's how researchers approach it: 1. Cross-Verification with Simplified Problems Researchers first test quantum computers on smaller instances of the same problem, where the solution is already known or can be computed classically in a reasonable time. If the quantum chip consistently produces correct results for these smaller cases, it builds confidence in its reliability. 2. Heuristic and Approximation Methods For large, intractable problems, approximate methods or heuristic algorithms on classical computers can provide partial or approximate solutions. These can be compared with the quantum computer's output to check if the results align or make sense. 3. Problem-Specific Verification Some problems have properties or constraints that allow for partial verification. For example, if the quantum computer solves a complex optimization problem, the result can be checked against the problem's constraints to see if it's valid (e.g., does it minimize the cost function?). 4. Benchmarking Against Simulators Quantum simulators running on classical computers can simulate small quantum systems. Although limited in scale, these simulations can be used to benchmark quantum chips' performance and accuracy. 5. Error Mitigation Techniques Researchers use error correction and mitigation techniques to ensure the quantum chip operates as intended. This involves understanding the noise and errors in the quantum system and applying corrections to reduce their impact. 6. Independent Re-derivation In some cases, independent theoretical methods or alternative quantum algorithms can be used to solve the same problem. Comparing results from different approaches can help verify the correctness. 7. Statistical Analysis Quantum computers often provide probabilistic results. Running the same problem multiple times and analyzing the distribution of outputs can provide insight into the reliability of the results. 8. Trusted Subset Testing For some problems, a subset of the solution space may be independently verifiable. For instance, in factoring large numbers (e.g., Shor's algorithm), the correctness of the factors can be checked quickly by multiplication. Challenges and Future Directions While current quantum computers are not yet at the stage where their outputs for large-scale problems can be trusted blindly, advancements in quantum verification methods, error correction, and theoretical understanding will improve the confidence in their results. Additionally, as quantum computers scale, they may develop their own methods for self-verification or cross-verification within a quantum system.

[@Thrilla1981]

😵‍💫

[@nilupilu]

yes, it just gives the probability of correct answers. one with the highest probability is the answer?

[@StoryForKids111]

​What if the real ans was an outlier. Strange things happen in this universe. Not everything follows a set of rules. ​@@nilupilu

[@benevolencia4203]

0:22 Parallel universes, or… Spooky calculations at a distance?

[@TranquiloCamilo]

And windows still freezes when I have to many tabs open. When will this come to my computer ?

[@luisgabrieltorres1784]

ok and what would be that super problem? just curious

[@composeryawyawmayhem6392]

Anything is possible as long as laws follow. You can't have chaps/order without laws. Life keeps getting more and more interesting.

[@sabirfoux4926]

Whatever google. It doesn’t matter. Until such technology is in the hands of every day people as common as a $500 purchase online then this doesn’t matter and never will.

[@michaelmancusosthoughts]

Tell that to traders on the market who will use tech like this to get an edge on the markets.

[@YellowMustard_]

You are completely wrong. Just because a new technology isn’t cheap or accessible yet doesn’t make it useless. Normal computers were at one point not a “$500 purchase online” but they still helped us achieve great things such as the moon landing. I see quantum computers in the same way.

[@BinBinBinko]

It DOES matter. Whether this particular instance is true or not is up for debate, science and technology IS important and a big deal. Do you understand how much "out of reach" technology is used to improve the lives of BILLIONS of people? Medicine, power generators, etc. These things take time and have many implications attached to them. Nothing is ever truly "useless". Don't be narrow minded.

[@AlexReynard]

Sounds like: What if you could fold time several hundred times, to borrow several hundred moments of yourself, stack them simultaneously, so you could put together every single piece of a Lego set, all at once.

[@STONECOLDET944]

Considering they openly admit people dont know how it works that actually work on it, and the central premis of the underpinning theory, QM, is an interpretation that fails to consider the true resolution of reality at the plank length, this simply a purely baseless claim ment to boost profit by capitalising of your ignorance

[@madebymonkeys5641]

I'm not ignorant..... for example, I know that the 'plank' length is how far a prisoner of a pirate can walk before drowning.

[@mattjackson9859]

But will it give us Rick and Morty's interdimensional cable?

[@nodocs74]

OMG !!!! I hope yes

[@PhoKingLitMedia]

Time does not move. As a matter of fact, time is the only thing that we experience that doesn't move. Instead, we actually move through time. The universe and everything in it is moving, spinning, and expanding at the speed of light. And the reality that we experience is the intersection of our 3-dimensional space and time itself. This is why we can't go back in time to a past event like the day you were born, or to see who built the pyramids. That point in space and that point in time will never intersect again. Unfortunately, there isn't even a way for us to measure our expansion rate since everything in the observable universe is expanding together at the same rate, leaving us with no point of reference.

[@georgias8099]

Creating shortcuts to solve problems when the real problem is ourselves, the lack of love and cooperation, will lead to destruction

[@TheErikaShow]

🎯

[@SilverYPheonix]

Oh go donate to a charity right now then if you have such a problem with it, hypocrite

[@SDKJoshua]

Ok can we jump there to a better timeline now?! Or swap some certain people to their better alternates?!

[@christiroseify]

Here's my question: If it would take a supercomputer septillion years to figure out that problem, how many years did it take this supercomputer to figure out how many years it would take the supercomputer to figure out that problem? Seriously... Septillion years???

[@madebymonkeys5641]

Isn't 'septilian', just a crocodile with gangrene.

[@area51z63]

There is no problem, seriously did you see it? Did they explain the problem to you? Are we too dumb to know the question? Apparently, they believe so

[@thehikingviking2049]

Right now, I'm currently rendering an image in a 3D modeling program. I know that the image is approximately 50% complete, and that it took me an hour and a half to reach that point. Based on total progress and the rate of progress, I can determine that the image will be completed in 3 hours. Assuming that the calculation scales linearly, this works even if a supercomputer has only completed 0.0000000000001% of the calculation.

[@mikemondano3624]

It's called "multiplication". You may have a vague memory of it somewhere.

[@chrisking14469]

its called time complexity. heres an example: lets say you're building a house. you know you need some number of bricks, N, to do so. there's a company next to you that sells bricks, but only sells 100 each day. you then have to spend the rest of the day to lay each brick. How many days does it take you to build the house? This is a 1st grade problem. you lay 100 bricks a day, and there are N bricks to lay, so it takes N/100 days to build a house. this is called "linear time complexity" because the time it takes to complete this task is represented by a linear equation See how you didn't need to go through the process of laying each brick to know how long it takes? even if you had to lay a billion bricks (which would take 10 million years using our equation), it only takes you a few seconds to whip out a calculator and compute the time. computer scientists like the ones at google are able to look at what a computer is tasked to do, and based on each step the task takes are able to determine how long it will take long before they actually run the task while the claim that google harnessed alternate universes is absurd, them beating a supercomputer by billions of years is realistic (quantum computers treat time complexity differently) and is no small feat. you can read more about time complexity here: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_complexity hope this helps :)

[@Lech_Robakiewicz]

Does it mean, that paralel universe runs time from the end to beginning? Which means that our (symmetrical) universe has certain ending. Which means it is (from beginning till the end) determined. Is there any possibility of freedom in this model? Or there is some another kind of freedom, that we (so far) can't understand?

[@skatscat1954]

We need up dated documentary of How The Universe Works!!!

[@AlexReynard]

"Wherever you look in the universe, it all looks roughly the same." [me shouting out the obvious]: IT'S A SKYBOX.

[@stevenelson25]

The person with the best pc, runs the crypto systems. That's what it's all about. I've been building gaming pcs my entire life. The industry has entirely shifted into energy conservation, and ledger system balancing.

[@forbiddenruin]

We're in the Age of Stagnation, everything has stopped advancing technology wise, its improved on old tech.

[@stevenelson25]

@@forbiddenruin I'm glad you mentioned this. I would say, that improvements to our communications infastructure, feels 10 years late, and the "new" stuff that comes out, It feels old. I personally, see this as the illusion of a competitive market. All this competition, and a lack of cohesion in advancing systems all together.

[@stevenelson25]

@@forbiddenruin I think you are correct, but it has lots to do with our shift away from individual processing power, and into energy efficiency and utility. And ofc,, years of spaghet code, in which we developed like our infastructure, without repair replace and redesign in mind.

[@forbiddenruin]

@@stevenelson25 The last I remember the most advancement tech made was little glass coin storage devices that holds multiple TBs of data, before that was the software advancement of Solid State Drives (flash drive tech boosted with software), everything else is advanced by software.

[@stevenelson25]

@@forbiddenruin So, I imagine that energy costs of converting complex computational power to end user data, is the bottleneck of understanding price vs performance maybe? I don't know anymore, but I appreciate your comments a lot.

[@cryptojonny6837]

The 1984 Dreamscape movie had it to where the universe was in the dreams, so anything is possible.

[@ajays6393]

Bruh I was thinking Google was doing a collab with Oreo judging by the preview pic. Got my hopes up damn it

[@forbiddenruin]

I dont trust Google for anything, they would put microchips in the cookies that not only tracks but connects to every electronic and scrapes our data in real time and theres nothing we can do about it because we ate the damn cookie, Don't Eat The Cookie.

[@Rude_Potato]

Foolishly I poured a glass of milk to have on hand before hitting play. Now I'm sitting here watching the milk get warm and not a cookie in sight.

[@ajays6393]

@@Rude_Potato so sad, do not let that glass be in vain, warrior. Stay strong

[@jojojojojojojo2]

what do you mean no practical use? It can be used in fusion cores to make realtime calculations to get rid of problems with disruptions...

[@jojojojojojojo2]

and just like this google became the number one energy supplier and with all that energy also was able to create an ai that lives... so sorry that I wrote that

[@YOURMOMYURMUMMA]

missing the obvious... random chance is supposed to be what casinos rely on.

[@VOLightPortal]

Can we get to the other side of the universe with it?

[@blairterry2]

Our consciousness accesses these energies as well. We have different filters that can hide our full powers from ourselves plus we don't always believe in our own potentials. Exceptions to this is people like Nicola Tesla, even Savants and to a certain extent Autistic individuals, who experience reality in a different way than non-Autistic people. I would even say children and animals may be able to access them as well.

[@bunch_o_racket]

If we all yell "help" at the same time, will Horton hear us?

[@paradiselost9946]

who?

[@futurespells]

That's a hell of a leap in logic. "Lack of Direct Evidence: While Willow demonstrates the potential of quantum systems, it does not provide empirical proof of parallel universes. Some scientists suggest that because the multiverse remains a theoretical construct, its existence cannot yet be confirmed through current experimental methods." - The quantum insider.

[@Barskor1]

If Google wasn't Evil this would be cool instead of terrifying

[@szilagyiandras-o9j]

Why is Google Evil?

[@Livinsticks1122]

Could Willow have triggered recent increased alien 👽 visits ? Or just a Phyop? 🤔

[@WannaBeChad]

Are DC & Marvel universes among those accessed by Google? 🤔🤔

[@madebymonkeys5641]

No.... can't be..... they would have race changed willow into a 6.7" black woman with Samuel Jackson's 'black girl magic', instead of a wond and acorns.

[@forbiddenruin]

no, but it can give you a killer trans Batman story.

[@borodel619]

When I am astrotraveling then I am entering different universes. Without technology. And everybody can do this. What tells this about us?

[@morpheus2490]

We have detected gravitational waves and recently detected that our whole universe is rippling like the ocean from things like supermassive black hole mergers. Please double check things you have said in this video

[@Rude_Potato]

Not sure if it is "tapping into" parallel universes, or more like creating parallels and following the variations of those inner digital universes and how those conditions lead to varying outcomes.

[@GemStar4071]

are we even the original universe then

[@supersayan6318]

@@GemStar4071 in a multiverse, there is no original universe. think of it as grains of sand on a beach, does it make sense to ask which of those grains of sand is the original?

[@GemStar4071]

@@supersayan6318 to create a multiverse there has to be a choice, so everything did come from one

[@captainthunderbolt7541]

No, we are the dumb, gullible universe that will fall for almost anything!

[@supersayan6318]

@@GemStar4071 to create a universe you don’t need a choice. you need something like the big bang.

[@GemStar4071]

@@supersayan6318 i was talking about multiverse that time

[@mikebasil4832]

If computers can become advanced enough to connect to the multiverse, then that’s quite awesome. Thank you for sharing all this information to help launch the New Year. 💻

[@YepTriedToTellYou]

It’s marketing bs. Qubits have nothing to do with a multiverse or quantum mechanics. It’s complete fantasy.

[@shawncarter5619]

Google has accessed NOTHING. As a massive tech conglomerate they will say and do anything to maintain an edge over the competition. The over use of the term AI has made it as meaningless as "racism"

[@MrJack556]

Yeah. Being called racist means Jack shit now

[@jumpieva]

I'm with you as an legitimate possibility, but if there was something that's nefarious, I wouldn't hold it past Google to try to take advantage. So this is real easy. Put up or shut up Google

[@Alien_Bones]

Dude, that's so 'A.I.ist'... 😆

[@madebymonkeys5641]

Woo woo woo.... wait a minute..... I'll have you know the word 'racism' has way less weight than the word 'AI'.... I mean, 'AI' has both an 'A', and an 'I' in it.

[@supersayan6318]

You got a point about google not accessing parallel universes, but your take on racism tells me that you call every minority a DEI, but of course, you’re not racist.

[@adamb89]

I think it's more like the holographic principle, but simply inverted to be outward projecting, as opposed to a literal reflection of the universe. As an analogy if you hold up an apple and look at it, the parts in front of you look closer than the parts behind you. But in this "mirror" universe, the apple would look the same, except the depth is inverted. As if you were watching a 3D movie but with the lenses on the wrong eyes. If you imagine a statue of a face, that's our universe. Now press that face into some clay to make an indentation. That indentation of the face is how the mirror would look, if you could actually see it.

[@gu9838]

the next question for it to tackle "who do furries exist " and......"why do women stay in abusive relationships and often once they do get out gravitate towards more abusive relationships" both will take so much power to solve

[@thehikingviking2049]

The answer to both is "childhood trauma, probably."

[@adrianaslund8605]

People used to dress up as satyrs and other costumes for debauched celebrations in ancient greece. Furries are probably some modern version of that.

[@LavenderLori406]

It's terrifying. We've created an uncontrollable monster...

[@GrayWhiteOfficial]

I have no mouth but I must scream

[@camilleguay9235]

Can we use it to compile software already

[@logesr7159]

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence... sounds like a bunch of BS.

[@coreyscornerofficial]

But what was the question that took it 5 minutes?

[@ajays6393]

Random Circuit Sampling

[@radiofun232]

Was also my question, no answer in this video. Makes it all very speculative when they cannot describe this "issue". I am still waiting.

[@coreyscornerofficial]

@@radiofun232 I'll comment back if I ever find out aha

[@swhite8381]

The universe is not “ out there “ . The universe is right here and nowhere else. We will never ever ever understand it at all . We cannot get out of it to actually look at it . So just enjoy the wonder of it all 💖

[@chefbabyryan1]

How would you verify the answer it calculated was correct if you can’t use another super computer?? 🤔 let me guess the same way Google returns 6 billion hits on a search in 2 seconds even though it’s more like (at best) a few hundred clickable relevant data points

[@yr1520]

Title: Google says... First 30 seconds of video: Some scientist say...

[@projectpunk706]

This may come as a shock to you but scientists actually work for Google. Wow who could've guessed that!

[@aspiringastronaut9992]

So do I walk backwards in the other universe?

[@Amazology]

New hype record attained

[@rsez6979]

Hope the qbits are better than the calc at 14:04, where integral of 1/x^2 from -1 to +1 is NEGATIVE TWO!!! LOL

[@bryanshort4422]

Are humans a mistake or are we the universe becoming conscious

[@Anthony-hu3rj]

They want me to pay for gmail. F Google and their "multiverse." Also, just repeating what their commercial says is BS upon BS.

[@fernandocalles1726]

Well if you’re using their service why should expect them not to charge you? You’re a bum 😂

[@pacmanisalivepodcast1575]

When did they say that? It might be time to dust off my old Yahoo email😂

[@Urbanxx001]

How the f*** are you paying for GMail it’s free??

[@nephewslim]

I have a thought. What if, an advanced A.I civilization was dying out but before they did, they found us on earth and gave us knowledge and the ability to create so in time we can recreate them.

[@AnTiThesis-HaT-HoT]

Says error and era like they’re the same in a vid about errors 😂

[@Ridethebomb777]

Where as its really a video about hypothetical garbage !

[@siliconbrush]

Yes but I think question we should all be pondering is....can it run Crysis at ultra settings?

[@peterboytRaKs]

A perfectly balanced left and right hemisphere guided by above and below, back and forth, left and right, extreme temperatures [X2], past, present and future, matter, energy, and space. Symmetry happens and the music starts. When things are off balance, you die and none of it has consequence. So, never stand up in a rowboat.

[@pooman2]

Well done my man

[@Urbanxx001]

I’m deep and she’s 14

[@RightBoyKA-POW]

I'm seriously supposed to be sleeping right now, but nah, this is more important!

[@tomos2825]

We should listen to Roger Penrose.

[@mikemondano3624]

He's 93. All I heard were dentures clacking.

[@World-widexl8]

I have two questions only can i put it in my SD slot and how storage do I get

[@andrewg.carvill4596]

IF anything in this Universe accessed 'parallel universes' then they are PARTS of this Universe.

[@likefrim]

Exactly!

[@RichardHarlos]

andrewg wrote, _"IF anything in this Universe accessed 'parallel universes' then they are PARTS of this Universe."_ Big claims require big evidence. Where's yours?

[@likefrim]

@@RichardHarlos Because the universe means “everything”. If it wasn’t everything, it would not be the Universe.

[@RichardHarlos]

@@likefrim So your proof is a definition. No scientific elements, just words. Got it. Thanks! Happy holidays! :)

[@RichardHarlos]

@@likefrim Then **by definition** you exclude parallel universes, where 'everything' exists but along a different active timeline. There's no scientific reason to define such theories away. Granted they are speculative, but not because there's some blatant error in the theory, but because our current technology doesn't know how to test for such entities. I think a little context and nuance would serve you well. Science isn't decided by definitions alone. So, the unknown ought not to be explicitly defined away just because someone prefers that view.

[@WILLIAMMALO-kv5gz]

The mirror universe is partly observable in clear water, ice or a mirror.

[@RichardPrieto-jx2dv]

No such thing as parallel universes because the very concept is self-contradicting and self-defeating (there would be a parallel universe where there is no such thing as parallel universes). The concept is dreamed up by materialists who want to imagine a reality without a "Necessary being" (e.g. Creator, God) to be the initial "cause" of reality. In essence, something to begin the process of cause and effect that underpins existence. Ironically, parallel universe theory does not even address that to begin with. It's also bad science because proper theories need to be disprovable by experimentation, and this one isn't.

[@thekingofmojacar5333]

😉👍

[@Grim2]

Let's see your scientific paper. Oh, wait, you don't have one, you don't even have the necessary education for this matter. You know jack s**t.

[@guruware8612]

Science does not try to "disprove" anything. Why always this misconception?

[@RichardPrieto-jx2dv]

@@guruware8612 It's called "falsifiability" and it's a fundamental, core concept of science. You can't rightly engage in "science" without it.

[@projectpunk706]

You've got it backwards. There can't be "parallel" universes that don't have a parallel universe.. that's literally the definition of the word. But there could be other universes that don't abide by the same laws of physics and may have no possibility of parallel universes. But you're missing the bigger point: superpositions. Superpositions are proven science and that's what they are doing to make qubits or quantum computing.

[@srenlund9803]

Simulation explains it . Simulation is executed not from the singularity but later that means that I’ve never been a singularity. It’s the same with the observations we’re making with the telescopes. We can only go back to appoint after singularity. If we make software rendering the Big Bang, we would have to start from where we can serve with the telescopes . Parallel universe also explained by multiple processes, running parallel to calculate different outcomes.

[@reukem]

Me: dad i need this chip Dad: for what Me: *𝓗𝓸𝓶𝓮𝔀𝓸𝓻𝓴*

[@0QualityOverQuantity]

Will I need to use VPN to avoid starting an interdimensional war?

[@BilalQureshi-pi9tz]

I understand up to some extend how Quantum Computing is related to Parallel Universes, but why and how you relating it to the Mirror Universe Theory?

[@danielmarshall7285]

So how do we know the calculation is correct

[@michaeldavidfigures9842]

Are they actual universes or "imagined" universes?

[@igormedo]

Schrodinger’s cat is not dead and alive at the same time. She is dead, alive, both and neither of the two at the same time. She’s in superposition, we don’t have another word for it to describe it’s state.

[@chriscarr744]

I started noticing wee changes about the place and had a strange encounter recently makes u wounder what else its doing if it is

[@pluto9000]

Sorry Google but Aperture Science Enrichment Center accessed parallel universes almost 10 years ago.

[@sparkysmalarkey]

This is like saying a human is accessing parallel universe when we use our imagination to explore *potential* solutions.

[@mandelaeffect-quantumstuff1615]

I'm one of the Quantum jumpers from the Mandela affect ! On my old Earth the traffic lights were reversed from here , we had the green light on top , yellow in the middle and red was on the bottom ! A mirrored effect quiet neat ! Peace.df.

[@DamianHallbauer]

This is great that this ideas are becoming more popular. They are the ones that make sense. It has spherical symmetry, and its reverses so that the double cover is redundant. This was known in 1918 by Emmy Noether, Einstein, Infeld, Born, and Mie. It developed into a unified scalar field model. The non-commutative aspect of action on a thin shell explains a lot and why we think it's flat or infinite or hot in the center. It's odd because Einstein had it colored and like a Bose-Einstein Condensate (BEC), with circular orbits, and not a singularity. The 2D action + 1 maps to R4. It's just like this but conserved energy on a cosmic cycle. This is very close to what was once thought to be fringe, but it's not even 4D; it's 3D. The holographic principle isn't a math trick. It takes time to convert light into memories, so we could be shrinking and think we were expanding, as it takes space and time to expand. Einstein ran his shell universe model backwards, spin increases , so he could se the initial conditions. It fits Noether's theorem for energy conservation

[@joetrolo7076]

The Singularity was when a black hole center in another universe had too much density, tore through the fabric of SpaceTime and ejected into our universe.😃

[@Stinger-rq4gy]

I think empty space goes on forever in all directions, up, down, left, right, forwards, and backwards. Universe is just a small area of stuff in empty space.

[@richardcriscione9427]

I don't think so nowhere near enough data it will take years before that have any idea and what it did.!

[@Belesprit656]

"Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely". Google is getting really close.

[@soughnymaugh]

Make me wonder if this thing could search the library of babel for a cure for cancer, time machines etc.