What Vatican II REALLY Teaches... and how the implementation fell short (w/ Fr. Blake Britton)

[@GospelSimplicity]

This video is sponsored by Faithful Counseling. For 10% off your first month, use the link, www.faithfulcounseling.com/gospelsimplicity

[@F2222m]

I can’t believe that Austin a Protestant is doing more for the unity of the Catholic Church than most Catholic KZbinrs online. Kudos Austin!

[@1Hope4All]

Amen to that! 🙌🏽 👏🏽 🙏🏽

[@lizledbitter6711]

Learned so much from this young man!

[@tropicalheat1558]

You said it well 🙌👏

[@CAVEDATA]

HA

[@EpoRose1]

The Spirit moves in mysterious ways!

[@FatherJMarcelPortelli]

As a priest ordained almost 11 years ago, I can attest to experiencing all of these intra-Church dynamics personally. I'll also add that since learning how to celebrate the Traditional Latin Mass, my appreciation for my priesthood has tremendously increased, plus it has enriched my celebration of the Novus Ordo. I'll be getting a copy of Fr. Britton's book. Excellent interview, Austin. Subscribed!

[@GospelSimplicity]

Glad this resonated with you! It was particularly interesting to read how learning the TLM has enriched your celebration of the NO. God bless!

[@kevinmc62]

This priest loves Jesus and has the joy of the Lord. As a convert, it was the language and ecumenism in Vatican 2 that actually helped me love Catholicism. It’s disheartening to see it become a point of contention when it was a place where it helped to unite me to the Church.

[@GospelSimplicity]

Thanks for sharing that perspective!

[@ericprine8804]

I had a long, slow time converting, but St Pope JPII's apologies to Jewish people and EO are a few of the things that helped pull me through my reservations. I know what you mean.

[@eskercurve]

Many in the "traditionalists" camp point to the ecumenism as a source of heresy and "walking back" the stance that the Catholic Church is the source of full truth. This of course is false. All V2 did was recognize other religions, traditions, and peoples have glimpses of the truth, but never did it say that the Church should compromise its positions that it is the source of truth. The stronger objections come from rightful indignation at how odd the NO mass is compared to the TLM. I prefer the TLM as being more reverent. But NO mass is still valid. There's also been "overstepping" bounds by various Popes, like JP2 kissing a Koran. But I always remember the the Pope is a person, not a living Saint, not perfect, not "another BVM" type of person. But somehow many traditionalists interpret "you shall know them by their fruit" as requiring perfection. Reality is nuanced. Who know? If JP2 had not kissed that Koran, maybe many more Christians would have died.

[@grmalinda6251]

@@eskercurve reverence in litergy begins in the heart. Let God's smile motivate.

[@jennbull0247]

My absolute favorite part of this wonderful interview was that neither of you assumed the worst of those with differing views on V2. You both assumed the best of each side and approached their arguments with charity. This is what Christian dialogue should look like! Well done!

[@adolphCat]

They were also avoiding any detailed discussion that would highlight Roman Catholic teaching before and after Vatican 2 using direct quotations from the Council do not match up. A similar discussion could be given concerning Lutheranism and Roman Catholicism and pretend that the 2 Churches teach the same thing. So, on both of their parts this was a very disingenuous discussion.

[@GospelSimplicity]

Approaching differences with charity is one of the goals of the channel. Glad that, at least your mind, we succeeded in doin so! I appreciate the encouragement

[@adolphCat]

@@GospelSimplicity Pretending is not charity, now you may very well agree with Vatican 2, but please don't pretend that Roman Catholic teaching contained in Vatican 2 is the same as Roman Catholic teaching before Vatican 2. Avoiding difficult questions is not charity, misrepresented a Council is not charity if you agree with the Council or if you don't, facts are facts.

[@masterchief8179]

@@adolphCat Are you an Eastern Orthodox, brother? Would you care to elaborate what the changes about “Roman Catholic teaching” before and after CVII are, according to your opinion?

[@adolphCat]

@@masterchief8179 One of the major difference is that Vatican 2 claims that Church of Jesus Christ subsists in the Catholic Church as opposed to before the Council that the Catholic Church is the Church of Jesus Christ. The Council moved toward adapting the Protestant notion of an invisible Church, yet not quite getting there. However, the Council also expended the Protestant notion of an invisible Church to include all major religions. The self understanding of what the Church is was changed in a major way at Vatican II. The change between Protestants being heretics to being separated brethren, and Orthodox from being schismatics to be not in full Communion with Rome. Actually what the Council says about the Liturgy is closer to Eastern Orthodox understanding of Liturgy than the Traditional Roman Catholic understanding of Liturgy. Yet, the actual reforms after the Council were in the direction of Low Church Protestant understanding of Liturgy.

[@rsnowden]

Thank you Austin for such a great interview. You have a gift for asking pointed questions and giving your guests the opportunity to address criticism without injecting argument. You are gracious with all your guests and a true example of Christian hospitality.

[@GospelSimplicity]

It's my privilege to get to do this. Thanks for the kind words!

[@michaelhodges2391]

Fantastic interview, many great things to take away from this video including not being on KZbin as much and actually reading source texts more frequently. Something that is very hard to do because reading is hard work but I've found recently that it's so worth it and I think everyone should give up a good portion of their online time to read the Scriptures and the Church Fathers and to most importantly PRAY 🙏

[@peaceandjoy2568]

Wow. Fr Blake is the real deal. Brilliant theologian, faithful to the traditional Catholic teaching, a good pastor at heart and has the most profound, authentic love for Our Blessed Lord Jesus Christ. Stuff saints are made of. What he said about Christ at the end was a ray of light from heaven. And he speaks with clarity about Catholic doctrine. I hope and pray that, Godwilling, one day he will sit on Peter's Chair.

[@jonathanbohl]

Its amazing how much Austin is getting into internal Catholic issues. :)

[@markaurelevangelista8622]

Fr. Blake has now become my favorite theologian. Thanks for this! God bless

[@GospelSimplicity]

Glad to introduce you to him!

[@sheylamercado9801]

This was such an inspiring interview I watched it twice! My favorite part was the ending. It moved me to tears. Jesus Christ the love of my life ❤️🙏

[@mitchellscott1843]

That ending got me too.

[@augustuslc]

Thank you, Austin, for this fantastic interview. This are the best interviews for me, the ones that show hints of holiness or truth, the ones that not only theorize about how Christianity should be rationalized, but the ones that live Christianity and preach the joy of the gospel with charity. “But he also expects each man to accept, as from his hands, the daily situations he sends him and to act as he would have him act and gives him the grace to act… As Christ had set the example for me, so could I be to them an example of Christian charity and concern…” W.J.C.

[@eskercurve]

Re: logical and critical thinking skills, I have found my engineering background, rooted in the logical thinking skills and problem solving skills, hugely helpful in me getting back to Christ. St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas are great examples.

[@GospelSimplicity]

Fascinating!

[@eskercurve]

@Gospel Simplicity I think of it like this. Similar topology covers engineering and the sciences as well as moral truth rooted in physical reality. Denying reality and the intentions of the Lord in using Christianity as a way to revere and protect interpersonal relationships and the basic units of them (the family) is ultimately destructive to humanity. Also, the data bears this out. Societies which embrace these truths flourish, and the more truth they embrace the better. Ones which then deny truth will eventually fall.

[@SergioBriMa]

@@eskercurve how do you reconcile this with disagreements with church doctrine or theology, if you have any. This is a part I struggle with.

[@KM-ec2qv]

Austin, this is so brilliant! I've heen a non-denom to Catholic convert for close to a decade and as someone with friends who attend self-described "spirit of Vatican II" churches that aren't in communion with Rome, I've struggled to understand the implications of VII for the practice of our faith as believers. This gives a lot of clarity and food for thought.

[@GospelSimplicity]

Glad it was helpful!

[@erint6540]

I think this is my favorite interview you've ever done!! Fr. Blake is a delight to watch and learn from! I kept saying YES, AMEN throughout! We are fortunate enough to have an excellent priest at our parish who teaches often on what Vatican II really says. He is traditional. We have a very reverent novus ordo as well as Latin mass. I praise God for holy priests! The future of the church is truly the family..which Satan is trying hard to destroy. Thanks again, Austin!

[@TracyW-me8br]

Gen X Catholic here that does not understand Vatican II. I want to like it but then I’m suspicious because of things I’ve heard and the results that have come from it. It’s obvious I need to take more responsibility and read the documents. Thank you so much for this interview!

[@lilikkrismantoro2027]

It is wonderful moment when Catholic Church opened the door for the Third world, and offer the love of God to us. Third world Catholic.

[@mariemorrison6278]

So true about going back to the VII sources rather some KZbinr's version of it. Consoling to know other councils had post-counciliar mess that time ironed out. Patience. That was an hour well spent. Thank you.

[@GospelSimplicity]

Glad this video was helpful for you!

[@saraanic9436]

This was a nice conversation. I especially liked the ending. Jesus Christ ❤✝️

[@benedictusman1160]

Probably one of the best interviews I've listened to, every minute was worth it. And Fr. Seems to rock the topic, seems like he could write another book on this

[@Ralph_Malph]

Fr Blake has a real grip of the essence of Vatican II.

[@Msc762]

Thanks Austin . This topic indeed is a hot one . I love the orthodoxy of my Catholic faith . I am Praying for the Church and for the continued guidance of the Holy Spirit .

[@jacksonbooth3537]

What a fantastic video. So happy you had Fr. Blake Britton on the channel. I'd highly recommend checking out his Burrowshire Podcast too!

[@GospelSimplicity]

Glad you enjoyed it! I"ll have to check it out

[@myronmercado]

Wow! One of your best videos yet, one of your best guest too. Part 2 please?

[@GospelSimplicity]

What would you like us to cover if we did a part two?

[@myronmercado]

@@GospelSimplicity how about your still remaining objections to the real presence and papal succession, Austin? 😊

[@peaceandjoy2568]

@@GospelSimplicity For Part 2 on Vatican II with Fr, what about "how the spirit of Vatican II is rampant today in many, if not most, seminaries and in Catholic schools, in parishes, in the German Bishops and their disobedience, even all the way up to the Vatican where mother earth and ecological concerns and political correctness are supplanting reverence for God. And how that ties into the recent Amazon Synod where an idol was brought into the Vatican and a monk bowed down before it. And how on the other hand the TLM is drawing young families and traditional young Catholics are growing in great numbers and His Holiness strangely suddenly restricted the TLM.

[@delvaassante5699]

What a blessing this Catholic priest is! Great video!

[@GospelSimplicity]

Fr. Blake is wonderful. Glad you enjoyed the video!

[@delvaassante5699]

@@GospelSimplicity You are a blessing also, Austin. It’s hard to believe you are 23 yrs old. You are a young man with an “old soul.” That is a compliment. 🙂 Thank you for these videos. You have helped make me an even better Catholic.

[@sami5to6]

Wow! That priest is brilliant and full of Christ's light!

[@GospelSimplicity]

Yes indeed!

[@carolannuk292]

I have learnt so much in this interview and been affirmed in some things too. God bless you both. Such a great resource.

[@GospelSimplicity]

Glad to hear that!

[@edwardhugus2772]

A great thank you to the Father for allowing us into the Monastary. His talk with you was wonderful.

[@MrFreddyd3]

Excellent interview!

[@GospelSimplicity]

Thanks!

[@RetepOdaged]

This was such a great conversation!

[@GospelSimplicity]

Glad you enjoyed it!

[@mariastefani1772]

Thank you for the discussion, Austin!

[@GospelSimplicity]

My pleasure!

[@JesseDLC]

A great guest, Austin! His insights are good food for thought. Lovin'it.

[@GospelSimplicity]

Glad you enjoyed it!

[@Gerrysjamz]

This was really interesting!

[@kantumeni8095]

This is the best channel. I appreciate your objectivity.

[@GospelSimplicity]

Glad you enjoy it!

[@30JLETO]

I attend a very traditional parish. Some famous Catholic personalities have attended my church when they’re in town. The TLM is one of the most attended masses there. We started a study group on Vatican II reading Word on Fire publication on the 4 constitutions with commentary. The discussions and readings have been fruitful, informative, and frankly relieving. Most of the attendees in the group go to the TLM. It’s been a wonderful experience discussing the council in light of its intent and trying to make sense of the church now. People are feeling more united and love their church. The Sunday NO masses have Latin, Gregorian chant, incense etc.

[@GospelSimplicity]

Sounds like a great group!

[@Miatpi]

Good. This can't be stressed enough. If people looked into the documents themselves rather than at what's said about them they would quickly realise they are very different from whats commonly thought about them.

[@GospelSimplicity]

Hope this video inspires people to do that!

[@masterchief8179]

@@graymann7762 Would you mind pointing what the actual documents that teach what you said and what their paragraphs are? I’d be more than happy - with the very texts - to show you are simply parroting lies from the Sedevacantist cult (only really relevant on American Internet). When you said you “read where it said (…)”, it is obvious you’ve actually never read anything since the whole Council published more than a dozen documents (16 to be exact). And probably if you’d like to come discuss with me, you are going to consult the Sedevacantist blogs that spread lies about as if you actually read them and come here with quotations. I would be happy to discuss them.

[@graymann7762]

@@masterchief8179 you aren't of good will so I'm not going to discuss a single thing with you. You've already calmuniated me twice in 2 different threads. But for anyone reading this, my statements are based on lumen gentium 2 & 8

[@masterchief8179]

@@graymann7762 I will just quote Lumen Gentium 2 & 8 to see what parts of it say we worship demons and the Church says we must not talk about Our Blessed Mother: “2. The eternal Father, by a free and hidden plan of His own wisdom and goodness, created the whole world. His plan was to raise men to a participation of the divine life. Fallen in Adam, God the Father did not leave men to themselves, but ceaselessly offered helps to salvation, in view of Christ, the Redeemer "who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature".(2) All the elect, before time began, the Father "foreknew and pre- destined to become conformed to the image of His Son, that he should be the firstborn among many brethren".(3) He planned to assemble in the holy Church all those who would believe in Christ. Already from the beginning of the world the foreshadowing of the Church took place. It was prepared in a remarkable way throughout the history of the people of Israel and by means of the Old Covenant.(1*) In the present era of time the Church was constituted and, by the outpouring of the Spirit, was made manifest. At the end of time it will gloriously achieve completion, when, as is read in the Fathers, all the just, from Adam and "from Abel, the just one, to the last of the elect,"(2*) will be gathered together with the Father in the universal Church”. “8. Christ, the one Mediator, established and continually sustains here on earth His holy Church, the community of faith, hope and charity, as an entity with visible delineation (9*) through which He communicated truth and grace to all. But, the society structured with hierarchical organs and the Mystical Body of Christ, are not to be considered as two realities, nor are the visible assembly and the spiritual community, nor the earthly Church and the Church enriched with heavenly things; rather they form one complex reality which coalesces from a divine and a human element.(10*) For this reason, by no weak analogy, it is compared to the mystery of the incarnate Word. As the assumed nature inseparably united to Him, serves the divine Word as a living organ of salvation, so, in a similar way, does the visible social structure of the Church serve the Spirit of Christ, who vivifies it, in the building up of the body.(73) (11*) This is the one Church of Christ which in the Creed is professed as one, holy, catholic and apostolic, (12*) which our Saviour, after His Resurrection, commissioned Peter to shepherd,(74) and him and the other apostles to extend and direct with authority,(75) which He erected for all ages as "the pillar and mainstay of the truth".(76) This Church constituted and organized in the world as a society, subsists in the Catholic Church, which is governed by the successor of Peter and by the Bishops in communion with him,(13*) although many elements of sanctification and of truth are found outside of its visible structure. These elements, as gifts belonging to the Church of Christ, are forces impelling toward catholic unity. Just as Christ carried out the work of redemption in poverty and persecution, so the Church is called to follow the same route that it might communicate the fruits of salvation to men. Christ Jesus, "though He was by nature God . . . emptied Himself, taking the nature of a slave",(77) and "being rich, became poor"(78) for our sakes. Thus, the Church, although it needs human resources to carry out its mission, is not set up to seek earthly glory, but to proclaim, even by its own example, humility and self-sacrifice. Christ was sent by the Father "to bring good news to the poor, to heal the contrite of heart",(79) "to seek and to save what was lost".(80) Similarly, the Church encompasses with love all who are afflicted with human suffering and in the poor and afflicted sees the image of its poor and suffering Founder. It does all it can to relieve their need and in them it strives to serve Christ. While Christ, holy, innocent and undefiled(81) knew nothing of sin,(82) but came to expiate only the sins of the people,(83) the Church, embracing in its bosom sinners, at the same time holy and always in need of being purified, always follows the way of penance and renewal. The Church, "like a stranger in a foreign land, presses forward amid the persecutions of the world and the consolations of God"(14*), announcing the cross and death of the Lord until He comes."(84) By the power of the risen Lord it is given strength that it might, in patience and in love, overcome its sorrows and its challenges, both within itself and from without, and that it might reveal to the world, faithfully though darkly, the mystery of its Lord until, in the end, it will be manifested in full light.” From that one should see you are clearly falling for Internet partisanship (and the wrong cause), for cultist behavior and Sedevacantism, which is strangely “relevant” only on American Internet.

[@masterchief8179]

@@graymann7762 No problem if you don’t want to engage with me in a serious theological discussion about orthodoxy and heresy. But you said I calumniated you only because I said you are spreading lies - “twice” because it was on two of your posts! -, exactly the lies of the Sedevacantist agenda, correct? But you are indeed, my friend. Maybe you are simply speaking of something you don’t really know of. I’m not really judging your heart and intentions. I only tried to express it engaging with you for you (and maybe other readers) to understand they are lies - but, as predictable, you are insecure to face it.

[@catherinewellen1160]

Thanks for sharing deep insights into Vatican II. I’m adding Jesus of Nazareth to my reading list.

[@helenlosse4977]

Just bought a copy to read during Lent

[@myronmercado]

Austin how about asking Father his conversion and vocation story on your next video with him?? Thanks so much.

[@christalenglish6105]

I love the Liturgy of the Hours!

[@HighKingTurgon]

Now i'm looking forward to your interview of Bishop Barron! (also Divine Office really does seem to be the discerning choice of mobile app for the Psalmody!)

[@PlguDctR-yb7mi]

Thank you for mentioning Liturgy of the Hours. The psalmody really is the center of Christian prayer life.

[@williambuysse5459]

This priest is excellent. Learned so much. I believe that modern Catholics need to learn the actions of modern philosophy initiated by Machiavelli. We in the West and many by extension in the rest have been raised within modernity taking it in as our mothers milk Likewise if baptized and raised within the Church we are initiated into the actions begun by Christ who is The God-Man. Both actions conflict and intertwine. Both need to be understood but only one to be lived out and understood. The problem is often that good Catholics do not understand the really radical nature of modern philosophy and what it desires. Modern non-catholics fail to understand the radicality of Incarnation. One cannot resist what one doesn't understand.

[@SeveredLegs]

Absolutely fantastic video guys

[@GospelSimplicity]

Glad you enjoyed it

[@englishlearningcenter1470]

I learned so much by watching this video! Thank you very much!!

[@1Hope4All]

I am definitely *NOT* a "Traditionalist." I do consider myself a *Traditional Catholic.* I am a Traditional Latin Mass Catholic but I don't feel that I've been disrespected. Perhaps misunderstood by "Novus Ordo Catholics." I know I shouldn't separate TLM Catholics from Novus Ordo Catholics. I'm just doing that to make an observation about the people who like different forms of the Mass. I want all of us to be united in ONE form of the Mass. And of course, I'm going to say, the *TRADITIONAL LATIN MASS.*

[@orthobroslovemyplaylists6254]

What do you make of Catholics in different rites?

[@scholasticschool3187]

God will, not NOVUS ORDOS MODERNIST, but the TRADITIONAL CATHOLICS!

[@adolphCat]

@@orthobroslovemyplaylists6254 He probably knows nothing about the Greek Catholic Church or the Maronite Church or any Eastern Catholic Church. Most hyper Roman Catholic Traditionalist are totally ignorant of Church History.

[@1Hope4All]

@@adolphCat • One, I am *NOT* a Traditionalist, *much less* a " *hyper Roman Traditionalist.* " • Two, I'm definitely not a "HE." • Three, since you didn't even know that I am a SHE, you also don't know anything else about me. • Four, "Based Byzantine" did not ask *you* the question. They asked *me.* • Five, so *mind your own business.*

[@1Hope4All]

@@orthobroslovemyplaylists6254 They are Catholic, just in different rites. My original comment was meant for people in the Catholic Church, Latin Rite. I would like unity for *all* Catholic Churches of the different rites. I see that you are Byzantine. Which Church? There are many that have the Byzantine rite. I want to say that you're in the Byzantine Catholic Church USA? But I don't want to assume anything. The Catholic Church is understood to be "a corporate body of Churches," united with the Pope, who serves as the "guardian of unity." That's according to Lumen Gentium. The other Catholic Churches, as opposed to the Latin Rite Church, were founded by the apostles and are autonomous Churches of their own existence. There are many autonomous individual Churches that make up the one, holy, Catholic, and apostolic Church. We should be careful not to blur lines of distinctions of the individuals just to emphasize unity. From what I understand, I can go and receive the Eucharist in one of these other Churches united with Peter in Rome.

[@myronmercado]

Austin where in the world did you find Father? Where has he been hiding all this time?? He's amazing. I definitely want to see him on your channel again. Wow!

[@hellebartelsen8208]

Check out The Burrowshire Podcast he did with Brandon Vogt. It's really excellent.

[@myronmercado]

@@hellebartelsen8208 thanks!

[@GospelSimplicity]

He really is great. I found him through my good friend Keith Little who hosted him on his podcast, The Cordial Catholic, and suggested I interview him

[@peaceandjoy2568]

He sure is. I wish Fr Blake had a KZbin channel as well.

[@Gerrysjamz]

So good I listened to it again

[@GospelSimplicity]

Glad to hear that!

[@EpoRose1]

46:50- regarding translating from the Latin; wouldn’t another approach be to make learning Latin more accessible? Especially knowing how something was translated- wasn’t one of the complaints of the “Novus Ordo” Mass that they mistranslated “many” for “all?” Wouldn’t it be helpful if the laity knew what the Latin was. People complain it’s a dead language, but it’s the basis of Spanish, French, Italian and Romanian. It’s used in scientific terminology and the root of many English words. My mother went to public school in the 1940s and 1950s and learned Latin. I never learned Latin and now I’m learning it now going to the Latin Mass.

[@GospelSimplicity]

I suppose it's possible, but I don't think it's very practical. I imagine there were people that would've told Jerome, "just make everyone learn Greek," but instead, we got the Vulgate. Likewise, after the Babylonian exile, the approach could've been, "make everyone learn Hebrew," but instead we got the Septuagint.

[@EpoRose1]

Maybe a both/and approach? Not to be able to converse in Latin, but just to have a working knowledge of official documents and liturgy.

[@zelie1155]

I used to not like Vatican II, that was until I actually read it and learned what it meant. I love the Second Vatican Council. My heart breaks at the sacrileges that bad priests, religious, and lay Catholics introduced, committed, and excused by the improper implementation of the Second Vatican Council. I still stand by the thoeology.

[@quayscenes]

😂 Of course, "Schillebeeckx", just the way it looks... [Excellent discussion - I particularly enjoyed the section on Gaudiem et Spes. Also the surprising Jesus of Nazareth II answer at the end - with the additional plug of Origen's Commentary on the Song of Songs]

[@GospelSimplicity]

I had to get the question in! I was surprised (in a good way, I think) by that answer as well. Really made me want to get around to reading it!

[@ikpehai-u5g]

I support praying the Liturgy of the Hours.

[@liraco_mx]

Definitely recommend the 3 Jesus of Nazareth books, so good! I can only hope I live to see part of the "course correction" Fr. mentioned so the liturgy can restore a lot of what was taken away.

[@GospelSimplicity]

I'll have to check them out!

[@danarose6314]

I'm so glad I've held my breath for the last 50 plus years waiting to hear what V II "REALLY" teaches! Next will come what the Bible "REALLY" says.

[@kurtwhiteley481]

Schillebeeckx was one of the primary writers in the Second Vatican Council. it's kinda ironic hearing a priest say he's reclaiming the Council from the guy who wrote it.

[@myronmercado]

What is the gospel: Jesus Christ. - I cried!

[@GospelSimplicity]

What a great answer

[@trevorhanlin4247]

dude love the Icons!

[@GospelSimplicity]

Thanks!

[@trevorhanlin4247]

@@GospelSimplicity Austin, while I haven't been able to watch many of your broadcasts live I do appreciate all of them, even more so I appreciate how you engage with us youtubees. please feel free to call on us when you are in steubenville!

[@jacobbritton7359]

Gotta' be proud of big bro :) he's smart ain't he?

[@GospelSimplicity]

Very!

[@ohmightywez]

Aw!!! I bet your mom was thrilled! My dad had 3 brothers, and they all became priests. My grandfather was afraid that perhaps the family name would die out (my dad was fighting in Italy and Austria at the time). Fortunately for my grandparents, my mom and dad had 11 children, 9 of them boys, and now 66 grandchildren and great grandchildren. lol

[@cathal8148]

As a Catholic who witnessed firsthand the destruction and loss of faith caused by Vatican ll, I respectfully ask why this conversation, this book, this viewpoint is not coming from Rome nor has it been proclaimed loudly and clearly by any of the post-conciliar popes. For those of us who have witnessed it from the beginning it's been heartbreaking to watch what Vatican II has done, sewing confusion and rebellion. "By their fruits you will know them."

[@Mr.SLovesTheSacredHeartofJesus]

Well said! ✝

[@frederick3523]

I will be honest, I'm instinctively put off by Vatican II apologetics because they always seem to downplay the problems the Church had and still has after the council but I have to say Fr. Blake did say something that I've felt for a long time: that Traditionalists are the most attacked group in the church and need pastoral guidance from people who don't hate them so I'll give him credit for that

[@GospelSimplicity]

Glad you appreciated that part

[@frederick3523]

@@GospelSimplicity I appreciated the whole video, fren.

[@Alexandru20101991]

Nice sweater!

[@kynesilagan2676]

Thanks Father for the encouragement. My fav is lumen gentium 14. I think Austin would relate to it.

[@salveregina147]

I have to watch this video.

[@robd7409]

The good father seems to think that none of us have read any of the documents. The problem is that we HAVE read the documents.

[@physiocrat7143]

And the documents are masterpieces of equivocation.

[@ignacio.gonzalez.osb_dc]

@@physiocrat7143 Such as . . . . ? What truth is being concealed? Where do the Council Fathers speak evasively or fail to commit to Jesus Christ?

[@physiocrat7143]

@@ignacio.gonzalez.osb_dc Sacrosanctum Concilium, the document on reform of the Liturgy. It is so ambiguous that one can argue endlessly about what it should mean in practice. It isn't even clear about such basic matters as which way the priest should be facing, what language should be used, or what principles should apply to the music used. The result is the liturgical anarchy evident in the Catholic Church since 1970. Since the Liturgy is the principal means by which the faith is propagated, the result is doctrinal chaos.

[@ignacio.gonzalez.osb_dc]

@@physiocrat7143Unity in Christ, not uniformity of expression is what the Holy Spirit directed the Council Fathers to articulate in its Dogmatic Constitution on the Liturgy, and you are confusing externals with essentials. And, as you say, "the Liturgy is the principal means by which the faith is propagated." What you see as "liturgical anarchy" I see as the beautiful diversity of expressions of the faith found around the world. Because as Catholics we are Trinitarian, not Unitarian, so the reform of the Liturgy was to correct an imbalance caused by the Latin-only liturgy that had become inaccessible to the faithful who prayed Rosaries as priests inaudibly mumbled through prayers only the most educated might be able to understand. Nevertheless, I share your concern that we seem to have lost the "hermeneutic of continuity" that the Latin liturgy is able to provide. I am hopeful that the further from the Council we get, the better the correctives to liturgical abuses will be.

[@physiocrat7143]

@@ignacio.gonzalez.osb_dc They threw away the baby with the bathwater. Congregations are perfectly able to follow the liturgy in their books in their own language. Latin was the practical expression in the Roman church and the means of maintaining that unity. Moreover, if the language is changed, the entire musical settings may have to be changed. In practice this was done very badly and in many English speaking countries, the lazy path was adopted of borrowing protestant music or trying to fit Gregorian chant to the new translations, resulting in a liturgical kludge. Here in Sweden the liturgy is barely recognisable as Catholic. In Germany there is no perceptible difference between a Catholic liturgy and the Lutheran one. Due to the amount of migration, it is not unusual to find liturgies in a dozen languages each week in one parish. Disunity in expression has led to disintegration. The practice of celebrating while facing the people is probably the most damaging of the V2 changes as it is a major reason for the misapprehension that the Mass is a re-enactment of the Last Supper.

[@jdlee1972]

I have 1 question. Is this rad trad to misinterpretation of V2 an American phenomena or is it evident too in Europe and eslewhere in the universal church?

[@TonyT-jn9vf]

Yes I would say it is across the world. People aren't understanding why the crisis in the Church is happening and are grasping at straws to make sense of it, it's really sad

[@adrienlevoyant4569]

I have a counsellor. The Holy Spirit and he casts out demons in Jesus name

[@USLad2008]

Your reasonable but I live in Chicago and under Cupich who Bulldozed his opinion and power and put major restrictions on the Latin mass and hurt people which he did not have to do. The Latin mass is packed. The rest of the churches are half full at best. 60 church’s closed and 120 church’s were merged.

[@GospelSimplicity]

I also live in Chicago, for what it's worth.

[@USLad2008]

Maybe you can use your skill set which is amazing and get an interview with the Cardinal.

[@MichaelCXSullivan]

I appreciate Fr. Blake Britton's understanding of Vatican II, however, he frames the post-counsel dialectics in a way that maligns Tradtion. Traditionalism is not just a reaction, but a recognition that V2 MUST be read in continuity with Tradition. There can not be a break from the past, continuity is religion. If we do not have living continuity with Tradition, then we are dealing with a new religion.

[@coreygossman6243]

So the first real paragraph he starts redefining terms, starting by reterming liberal theology as paraconciliary and defining traditionalism as based on falsehood. It's tough as a nondenominational Christian when listening to Catholics who claim to be based on ancient tradition and unchanging but also will demonize tradition and those resistant to change because they go against the papacy. As a thought experiment, would a Catholic support the words of Jesus or would a Catholic support a pope or a council, if there were a contradiction?

[@AnCapChase]

That's why Orthodoxy is the way to go ;)

[@peaceandjoy2568]

The words of Jesus.

[@coreygossman6243]

@@peaceandjoy2568 What if the Pope speaks a heresy ex cathedra?

[@peaceandjoy2568]

@@coreygossman6243 Some bad popes have said heretical things but Catholics are duty bound to reject all heresy even from persons in authority. No pope has proclaimed a heresy ex cathedra. The Holy Spirit will not allow it. Jesus has promised this. I don't worry about the chance that a pope might do such a thing since nothing happens unless God allows it. In its efforts to destroy the Church evil cannot go beyond the point that God has set.

[@coreygossman6243]

@@peaceandjoy2568 Ex cathedra is a doctrinal development, not an original teaching of Jesus, or the Apostles. I'd like to see any Church fathers opinions on ex cathedra that you know. It's a cope. You are bound as a Catholic to the ordinary magisterium as well as extraordinary magisterium, so the "ex cathedra" issue means you are still bound by the heretical proclamations of Francis. Furthermore, are Church councils infallible? If so, why are there contradictions in Councils from ecumenical councils to vatican councils?

[@arthurhallett-west5145]

Now you need to interview a spokesman from the Society of St Pius X, Austin

[@GospelSimplicity]

Anyone in mind?

[@rubenmartinez4346]

@@GospelSimplicity Father Kevin Robinson

[@Raikoushiro]

I just find it strange how he keeps saying thia generation completely lacks being raised in Christianity and are clueless to who protects are. That just has but been my experience.

[@GospelSimplicity]

Probably varies geographically

[@Raikoushiro]

Very true forgot about that

[@graymann7762]

He talks about discovery of new things namely with enlightenment (without citing anything) as basis to make changes HOWEVER he doesn't mention a single papal encyclical that were counter enlightenment.

[@graymann7762]

He's a dishonest priest.

[@myronmercado]

Austin you know so much more than most of us devout Catholics do. Are you sure you're not Catholic yet?? Hehe, just teasing you there.

[@GospelSimplicity]

In fairness, I suppose one could say that I know more about Orthodoxy than many Orthodox, but I don't think that makes me Orthodox either

[@sewmanyquilts8042]

I understand that this is a kind of dialogue to see what differant “Christian “ groups believe. But it difficult to weigh in because the church that is closets to what the original church taught and celebrated has got to be the Orthodox Church. They don’t seem to have this problem What problem? The problem of taking what this man says and that man says over what the original church did and still does in the Orthodox Church. The opinion of man is not important. The opinion of GOD is only important. And what did Jesus say? “I am the way the truth the life no one comes to the Father except through me”.

[@eskercurve]

Actually I think the Orthodox church was founded because around 1052 politics and bad (horrifying even) actions from the Roman's caused the churches of the Byzantine empire to break away. Along the way they made up theological differences. That is the definition of "what he says and what he says." It continues today with the Constantinople and Moscow patriarchs being at odds. Jesus by making St. Peter the first bishop of Rome, and cemented in Acts, made it very clear that the reason there is a pope is to avoid (in theory) those sorts of disagreements. Those who persist in those errors (read all "Protestant" churches and Orthodox church and yes the German "catholic" churches) are in schism.

[@sewmanyquilts8042]

@@eskercurve Orthodox Church was separated from Rome at that time because Rome tried to change words in the creed There’s politics everywhere through all ages. Even king David had political computation with the first King of Israel Saul. Yea Soo politics wasn’t the split. It was a fight over Rome trying to change words in the creed.

[@sewmanyquilts8042]

@@eskercurve ps t he point is that UNTIL the Orthodox Church split because of Rome trying to change the creed there was only one church and the orthodox maintained that original form while Rome went on its merry way doing the will of men.

[@eskercurve]

@Sew many Quilts so you all disagree with the Pope on a dogmatic rule. How is that not schismatic?

[@adolphCat]

@@eskercurve The Pope disagreed with the Church the Ecumenical Council forbid additions to the Creed. A Creed the Whole Church East and West agreed to. The Pope of Rome is a member of the Church and thus subject to the Authority of Holy Mother the Church. The Church is not the body of the Pope, but the Body of Christ. The Pope declared himself superior to the Church, thus the Pope went into Schism and left the Church.

[@DaveK548]

Vatican II was a unique chance for the Roman Church to return to the sources of the faith and to draw closer to Orthodoxy - to return to the Apostles and Fathers and to emphasize the truth, beauty, and goodness of the undivided Church. Instead, it was implemented as the top-down destruction of tradition, resulting in the protestantization and secularization of the Western Christian tradition, which the current papacy is continuing. The destruction in the wake of Vatican II is the primary reason that I became Orthodox rather than Catholic. I continue to pray for all our Catholic brothers and sisters! ☦️

[@briandelaney9710]

Austin is talking like a Catholic already

[@diegobarragan4904]

So Catholics talk like Protestants? I think you are right about that.

[@Ozwald214]

Though...the subtle language and perfectly placed verbiage in the documents is observational and can easily be verified as INTENTIONAL that would lead to the wanted changes...all for the worse. Learn

[@saskoilersfan]

How a race of cannibals rose to power...by eating the enemy .

[@homebody13]

Gonna be Gospel Fight Club looks like. 😬

[@halleylujah247]

Oh I hope not😭

[@grmalinda6251]

Sing the Hours, with Paul Rose.

[@CatholicWithaBiblePodcast]

My man. I love you, but do me a favor: say "rabbit "HOLE"

[@GospelSimplicity]

Are they not synonymous?

[@graymann7762]

What it really teaches is heresy. Let him who hath ears to hear, let him hear .

[@GospelSimplicity]

Out of curiosity, which documents do you find particularly egregious?

[@graymann7762]

@@GospelSimplicity I responded earlier but I don't see it showing any longer. But at any rate my reply was. Lumen gentium.

[@masterchief8179]

@@graymann7762 I’d direct anybody to Taylor Marshall’s - a famous RadTrad that is wrong on a number of things about Catholic theology by the way, spreading confusion all around - comment on Lumen Gentium and Islam in his own site. You are insisting on falsification and actually making clear to belong to the Sedevacantist cult (even if you don’t admit it). He himself says Lumen Gentium is 100% correct (just read it) if we understand what the document says and actually read it. The Father of Lies is simply trickier than the level of intelligence of the middleman: whenever people are overfocusing on the crazy “progressivists” of the church, who are already in his pockets, he is using many of the so-called “traditionalists” to spread out his own work. Sorry to say it out loud but you are anything but Catholic. Sorry for being that harsh. I guess Internet is really the place for you, pal. From a Brazilian friend.

[@graymann7762]

@@masterchief8179 all I read was a lot of calmuny and no substance. But if you want to twist it and use the understand that Muslims worship the God the Father, which is obvious is a person of God, that is still heresy. That is because God is undivided, and though different from person's of God the Son and God the Holy Ghost, He is still the same nature and that nature isn't divided and thus you can not say we worship the same God. But even in that the gospel of Mohammad is a vastly different version of "God" than what Catholics have received in tradition and scripture. My statements are codified in the creeds and various encyclicals and council documents. Vatican II teaches the otherwise and that is the textbook definition of heresy. For some reason that offended you which is why you wrote the nonsense you wrote.

[@masterchief8179]

@@graymann7762 Clearly you don’t have a clue on serious theology (sacred or natural). No one says the Muslims worship the person of the Father, which is just plain ignorance on the subject. The documents say they “profess” to worship the ONE TRUE God (that’s exactly the reason they are not called idolaters like the pagans, but as “infidels” in St Thomas Aquinas or in the Catechism of St Pius X), which they even partially know of by natural theology through metaphysical reasoning. It is the case they follow false and corrupted “revelation” (Qu’ran) though, and it is correct to say they worship the One True God falsely since they don’t recognize the Holy Trinity in the unity of divine essence - and they also refuse to recognize Jesus Christ as Lord and Messiah. St Thomas Aquinas, on the 13th century, called the Islamic Saracens as “infidels” in his “De rationibus fidei”. I would encourage anyone to actually read the arguments used by St Thomas Aquinas against Islam in the “Summa Contra Gentiles”. In no part of Catholic theology they are treated in the category of idolaters (= those who worship a false god or false gods); they are treated on the category of infidels because they worship falsely the One True God. St John Damascene even treated Islam as inside the Christian heresiology in the 8th century: “the heresy of the Ishmaelites”, written in Greek, is part of his monumental “Fount of Knowledge”. So, to simplify it and show you are spreading falsities, Lumen Gentium brings exactly the IDENTICAL teachings of the Catechism of St Pius X. Catechism of St Pius X: “12 Q. Who are infidels? A. Infidels are those who have not been baptised and do not believe in Jesus Christ, because they either believe in and worship false gods as idolaters do, *or though admitting ONE TRUE GOD, they do not believe in the Messiah, neither as already come in the Person of Jesus Christ, nor as to come; for instance, Mohammedans and the like”* . So it is obvious that in no part of Catholic doctrine it is said that Muslims worship the person of the Father (from what did you get this idea?) since their very concept of divinity is entirely irreconcilable with the Trinitarian concept of divine oneness, therefore to the core of our faith. But no (absolutely zero) document of Vatican II says they have an authentic belief, only that they are mysteriously closer to Truth (and therefore to us) than pagan idolaters due to the fact that they profess to believe in the One God of Abraham. It does not say they indeed do nor it says they believe correctly (or authentically) - since they stick to the “preambulae fidei” and never arrive at the faith (“fidei”), to use a traditional nomenclature common in Catholic theology. St Justin Martyr’s natural theology also indicates, as St. Augustine would later, regarding the "true religion", that the seeds of Christianity predated Christ's incarnation through Greek philosophical reasoning (Socrates, Plato and Aristotle) and their despise for pagan polytheism. So stop spreading lies or talking of things you are not actually acquainted with, my friend. My God truly help you on dealing with your anguishes and may the Holy Spirit light your path.

[@johnjay7255]

At the end of the day, your typical Roman parish is no visually different than Anglican, Lutheran, etc.

[@TommyGunzzz]

Even the title sounds like papal lawyering. This is what it "REALLY" teaches.

[@johnjay7255]

I wonder is St. Basil ever wrote on the alleged supremacy of the Roman Patriarch

[@masterchief8179]

*St. Maximus the Confessor* _”For none has a right to use violence, especially when faith is in question. For herein even the weakest waxes mighty, and the meek becomes a warrior, and by comforting his soul with the divine word, is hardened against the greatest attacks. _*_How much more in the case of the clergy and CHURCH OF THE ROMANS, which from old until now, as the elder of all the Churches which are under the sun, PRESIDES OVER ALL? Having surely received this canonically, as well from councils and apostles, as from the princes of the latter [Peter & Paul], and being numbered in their company, SHE IS SUBJECT to NO WRITINGS or issues of synodical documents, on account of the eminence of her pontificate, even as in all these things all are equally subject to her according to sacerdotal law‘. And so when, without fear, but with all holy and becoming confidence, those ministers of the truly firm and IMMOVABLE ROCK that is of the most great and APOSTOLIC CHURCH OF ROME, had so applied to the clergy of the royal city [Constantinople] it was seen that they had conciliated them and had acted prudently, that the others might be humble and modest, while THEY THEMSELVES MADE KNOWN THE ORTHODOXY AND PURITY OF THEIR OWN FAITH FROM THE BEGINNING._*_ But those of Constantinople, admiring their piety, thought that such a deed ought rightly to be recompensed; and ceasing from offering them the document, they promised to produce by their own care the issue of the Emperor’s order with regard to the episcopal election. When this was accomplished, the apocrisiarii [representative of Rome in Constantinople] dear to God thankfully returned home”_ (Ex Epistola Sancti Maximi Scripta ad Abbatem Thalassium, PL 129.585-6).

[@masterchief8179]

I didn’t find much on the part of St Basil concerning this, brother. God bless!

[@mariorizkallah5383]

Lumen Gentium is a huge slap in the face of Saint John of Damascus.

[@TonyT-jn9vf]

Only if you don't read it in light of scripture and tradition. It never states that someone can be saved without Christ

[@mariorizkallah5383]

@@TonyT-jn9vf you think muslims worship the true God with Christians?

[@TonyT-jn9vf]

@@mariorizkallah5383 it depends. Do they believe Jesus is God? No. Do they believe that they are worshipping the God of the Old Testament? Yes, because who else do they believe in? They believe they worship the same God as Abraham, which is the One True God. This is important to distinguish as the God of Abraham, Who is God the Father, and has unique characteristics unlike other religious dieties. Most notably, He is uncreated, omnipotent, omniscient, immutable, and compassionate. Is what Muslims believe about God sufficient for salvation? No. In a sense, you can make the case that Muslims do not worship the same God as Catholics, but in that case you would also have to say that Protestants do not worship the same God as us, as we both understand God very differently. The important thing is that the belief of Muslims is not sufficient for salvation. The Catholic Church has always maintained that baptism is required for salvation and that objective schism or heresy separates you from the Body of Christ. I see no problem with Lumen Gentium 16 if you simply read it charitably. Is it too ambiguous? Probably. However that doesn't mean it actually teaches something contrary to the Faith. You can interpret Lumen Gentium 16 as heretical just like Protestants misinterpret the Council of Trent, how Arians misinterpreted the Council of Nicaea, or how atheists misinterpret the Bible. The reason we are Catholic is because we have the complete Deposit of Faith. Scripture, Tradition, and Magisterium all need to be there or else it isn't long until there is an error.

[@andrewhiggins9732]

Look at the fruits the council has brought forth. How could the Holy Spirit allow all the heresy to happen? God forbid, He has not had anything to do with this council nor the western church sense 1054.

[@Shiranui115]

One could make the same argument amidst the throes of the Aquitaine Schism following the Fifth or Sixth Ecumenical Council, or the schism of the Oriental Orthodox following Chalcedon, or the schism of the Persians after Ephesus, or all the Arians and Semi-Arians running around following I Nicaea. Full disclosure, I'm Orthodox, but we have plenty of ugly periods in our own history following such things as the Nikonian Reforms and the pan-Orthodox Synod that adopted the New Calendar. Conflicts, controversies and periods of confusion don't invalidate the Church as being the Church. The fact that the Church survives afterwards shows that Christ's promise holds true. We can afford more grace for our Catholic friends in this regard.

[@zelenisok]

Joe Rogan and Jordan Peterson are critical thinkers? Maybe critically bad thinkers lol

[@GospelSimplicity]

I've admittedly never watched Joe Rogan, but even where I disagree with Jordan Peterson, I think his appeal is that people feel he's asking questions that either others aren't or others haven't asked in the same way

[@zelenisok]

IDK, as someone who went to a seminary, after that to a secular college to major analytic philosophy, and someone who has a decent general grasp of current scientific knowledge (including eg psychology, the department of which I had contact with at my second college), I cannot listen to Rogan or Peterson and hear anything except waves of factual (scientific, psychological) and philosophical (and theological) ignorance, misinformation and frankly often babble.

[@GospelSimplicity]

@@zelenisok Notice that above I'm not saying that he's necessarily correct or perceptions of him are. Rather, I think people perceive him to be asking different/unique questions. Perception and reality need not be the same and the former is often more powerful for garnering an audience and more pertinent to influence

[@bionicmosquito2296]

It is quite interesting to hear a Catholic priest counsel that if one wants to get at the truth (of Vatican II), one should read the documents for themselves, instead of taking it second-hand. Really sounds quite Protestant.

[@SaltyPalamite]

This is propaganda. Please have on a guest to rebut this modernist nonsense.