Europe Countries Population 1600-2022 | Kingdoms, Empires, Republics | Napoleonic Wars, WW1, WW2

In this video we compare the population of European countries and the surrounding area for the last 4 centuries that have seen great changes in the size and composition. Europe today has eight times the amount of people it did just 400 years ago. This data series focuses on what the largest polities were throughout recent history. Given the challenges of demography, the visualization begins in 1600 and details the numerous changes to population within the interim period.
Sources: A wide variety of sources were employed in order to project the data. Tacitus.nu, Penguin Atlas of Recent History, Angus Maddison project, various academic studies, and Eurostat provided most of the information. The population of colonies and holdings outside of Europe are excluded with the exception of the Russian and Ottoman Empires. Given the numerous changes in borders, the continental total can sometimes be erratic, shifting downwards or upwards for seemingly no reason. Generally, this is because various other nations are either no longer being recorded or diverging sources, not necessarily due to massive casualties.
Obviously no data set is perfect, especially on matters so speculative such as population growth in the 1600s and 1700s, but I have put in my best effort. Please comment if you notice any serious errors so they can be rectified.
Music: Tchaikovsky - Slavic March, Ludwig Van Beethoven - Egmont Overture
Thanks for watching! Please like and subscribe!
I use Alien Art Charts to make those videos, use this link alienart.io/?referer=626917e1... to make similar videos as mine.
Countries included:
Ottoman Empire
Kingdom of France
Habsburg Spain
Russian Empire
Poland-Lithuania
Habsburg Monarchy
Kingdom of England
Duchy of Savoy
Electorate of Saxony
Dutch Republic
Papal States
Kingdom of Sweden
Kingdom of Ireland
Denmark-Norway
Swiss Confederation
Venetian Republic
Grand Duchy of Tuscany
Kingdom of Scotland
Electorate of Bavaria
Bradenburg-Prussia
Confederate Ireland
Kingdom of Portugal
Commonwealth (England)
Bourbon Spain
Kingdom of Prussia
Great Britain
Kingdom of Sardinia
Kingdom of Naples
French Republic
Batavian Republic
Cisalpine Republic
Duchy of Württemberg
Electorate of Hanover
Helvetic Republic
French Empire
United Kingdom
Napoleonic Italy
Kingdom of Bavaria
Kingdom of Saxony
Kingdom of Holland
Kingdom of Westphalia
Kingdom of Sicily
Kingdom of Württemberg
Bonapartist Spain
Grand Duchy of Hesse
Grand Duchy of Baden
Kingdom of Spain
Kingdom of Netherlands
Sweden-Norway
Kingdom of Denmark
Kingdom of Two Sicilies
Kingdom of Hanover
July Monarchy
Kingdom of Belgium
Austria-Hungary
United Principalities
Kingdom of Italy
Kingdom of Greece
German Empire
Serbian Principality
Principality of Bulgaria
Kingdom of Serbia
Kingdom of Romania
Kingdom of Sweden
Kingdom of Norway
Kingdom of Bulgaria
Portugese Republic
Soviet Union
Weimar Republic
Polish Republic
Czechoslovak Republic
Kingdom of Yugoslavia
Kingdom of Hungary
Republic of Austria
Republic of Turkey
Hellenic Republic
Nazi Germany
Federal State of Austria
Republic of Spain
Spanish State
Republic of Finland
Vichy France
Republic of Ireland
State of Croatia
Occupied Germany
Polish People's Republic
Federal Yugoslavia
Occupied Austria
Italian Republic
Romanian People's Republic
People's Republic of Bulgaria
West Germany
East Germany
Communist Czechoslovakia
People's Republic of Hungary
Republic of Austria
Kingdom of Spain
Hellenic Republic
Federal Republic of Germany
Polish Republic
Romania
Czechoslovak Republic
Hungary
Republic of Bulgaria
Russian Federation
Ukraine
Republic of Belarus
Czech Republic
Serbia
Napoleonic Wars
WWI
WWII

[@gozhdaa]

This video project took me about one month and half to complete since it goes back four centuries, I have put a lot of effort into it and if you guys enjoy it, please feel free to like and Subscribe. P.S. There are tons of data in this video and mistakes might happen. Austria-Hungary was formed in 1867 not in 1850* as shown in the video.

[@reporol]

Thank you for making a video where the geopolitical entities change with history instead of being static.

[@lorofcb3]

Tremendous work, much appreciated!

[@axwleurope9519]

Spain ever had the name of Habsburg Spain or Bourbon Spain

[@sa5hk0]

Russian Empire didn't exist in 1600-s, it's became empire only in 18 century. Also Soviet Union emerged not in 1917, but 5 years later in 1922

[@m.dewylde5287]

You are awesomeeee!!!!

[@Peacefull_]

Все страны: существуют, иногда меняют свой статус. Франция: - Я Империя! - Я Республика! - Я Империя! - Я Королевство? - Я Монархия?!?! - Я Республика! - Я Империя! - Нет, я определённо Республика! Да, я уверен в этом. По крайней мере на данный момент...

[@qoysary]

Вива ля франс

[@xpr3ss.755]

Speak English

[@Peacefull_]

@@xpr3ss.755 сам спеак енглисх

[@USSRGalactic]

​@xpr3ss.755 ,используй переводчик

[@manuel-xv1ur]

​@@qoysaryno

[@greggeverman5578]

Listen, I get that all of us history buffs are gonna notice some errors here and there in the chart, its what we do. But just keep it respectful, guys. These videos are HARD to make, and time and passion consuming. Lets all give the channel a hand, eh? 👏 👏 👏 👏

[@SneakyLlamaMC]

soviets only lost 6 mil people in ww2...

[@universalflamethrower6342]

38 million

[@SneakyLlamaMC]

@@johnzenkin1344 Exactly, The Stats Where Wrong.

[@SneakyLlamaMC]

@@universalflamethrower6342 The Video Said 6 Million, That's Why I Commented That

[@user-pd7qn9uo4u]

No. I would like to see your reaction at video where your nation is deleted from history.

[@marcusbatters2794]

The Russian Empire was founded in 1721. That is, there used to be a kingdom and a principality.

[@mosyoselcuk]

I agree whit u him mistake

[@murzilka301]

Раньше называлось - Царство. Практически одно и то же.

[@user-xf7tm9nq3i]

Before the Russian Empire there was a Russian Tsardom. It doesn't make a fundamental difference.

[@mykola.ilashchuk]

actually it was a moscow tsardom and this is very important point

[@user-xf7tm9nq3i]

@@mykola.ilashchuk An important moment of Ukrainian propaganda. Only it is designed for domestic consumption. Hey, here anyone can open historical maps and see countries.

[@Sceptonic]

Crazy how the Ottomans stayed at 28-32 million (fluctuating) for almost two centuries.

[@Wartensteiin]

Are you that guy I see in xQc's comment section?

[@Sceptonic]

@@Wartensteiin wtf how?

[@Wartensteiin]

@@Sceptonic I saw you multiple times.

[@gamolacountryballs2293]

and crazy how it managed to reach the top 3 again

[@eatinsomtin9984]

@@Wartensteiin LQC

[@Eevcee]

Why is Spain always referred to as “Hapsburg Spain” and not just the Spanish Empire? We never say Romanov Russia or Bourbon France…

[@ariearie3543]

Haha Orange Netherlands.

[@ellidominusser1138]

Idk, but I don't mind it

[@krissdev6301]

But it was Bourbon France in the video🤔 anyway idk history of Spain so good to argue:)

[@eduardo7562]

Los depredadores ingleses siempre tergiversando la historia de España, que es muchísimo mas grande e importante.

[@runtaoyang1244]

hapsburg spain includes austria and the netherlands and was politically different from colonial spanish empire

[@lucasurquia2900]

I love this videos. Thank you for the effort you put on it.

[@michalhrdy577]

great video, must've taken lots of work, thanks!

[@drbruh3567]

Great work and great music!

[@tomasszu]

Amazing video!

[@uranusneptun5239]

The thing to cosider is that over time borders changed a lot, so it's not just growing populations but conquering others and new countries and alliances forming...

[@mitinik]

Ahahah, quick changing of population it’s doesn’t matter?

[@Boombampop.]

Nobody like this comment, it’s at 69

[@AL-kb3cb]

They didn't actually, except for France.

[@Hehdks]

​@@AL-kb3cbRussia, Germany and Italy:

[@eliteranger1001]

@@HehdksSweden 1721

[@GazalAlShaqab]

GREAT work, a lot of things to learn from it, THANKS!

[@kovalthud]

Good work bro! It deserves a like!

[@gozhdaa]

Thanks mate

[@kovalthud]

@@gozhdaa no problem bro! I like this content

[@Romanball5677]

Dude great Job thanks for making it next you should do the world population

[@gozhdaa]

Thanks mate

[@pgdawson73]

Awesome project!

[@GlobeDataHub]

Mind-blowing data! 🤯

[@michealyu2957]

nice work!

[@gozhdaa]

Thanks!

[@saintleger858]

La population et son importance influe énormément sur les action diplomatiques d'un pays ., très intéressant Merci!

[@Monsieur_Coin]

La démographie fait l'histoire

[@MaxMax-me5gv]

oui mais pour le coup le classement est faux

[@jerome2418]

@@Monsieur_Coin "Tout est moral chez les individus et tout est physique chez les masses."

[@Monsieur_Coin]

@@jerome2418 Exactement. C'est ce que les pro-immigration n'ont pas comprit.

[@michaelkelly8083]

Thanks for making this!

[@slotjes]

Awesome, great video!

[@axolotl-guy9801]

Nice video. Although Bradenburg should be named "Brandenburg" lol. Suprised that nobody pointed that out I assume.

[@tarhyasah7707]

Noticed that every time someone was going to conquer Russia, it grew in size, it's always a gifted opportunity for Russia to act.

[@Dennan]

only reason they wanted to attack russia was couse russia had already attackt earlier. russia has always been meddling and aggressive to the west.

[@el.padre.]

Сейчас тоже самое, но это уже не Европейские империи, сейчас это Заокеанский гегемон решил захватить Россию, видимо они уверовали в свои силы когда развалили Советскую империю. Так что готовьтесь к новой-старой империи, Российской. И никакая травля и спонсирование бывших стран входящих в Российскую и Советскую империю не поможет им, притормозит только возрождение России как одну из великих империалистических держав . Американская империя зла доживает свои последние годы.

[@user-nl3xl9is1n]

👏👏👏👌100%

[@SithMangaArt]

It's just russian spirit, bro. We have proverb: "Russians harness for a long time, but they go fast"

[@k.r.u.a.6174]

In fact, in 90% of cases, Moscow is the organizer of wars. Justifying all this by saying that they want to capture it. Even now you have started a war against Ukraine, justifying it by the fact that Ukraine, which you disarmed for 30 years, wanted to attack Russia. Jackal tactics. Finland was attacked, Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia were attacked, Chechnya, Afghanistan, Georgia. Together with the Nazis they attacked Poland. This makes it scary that such a state exists.

[@user-cu4oz9ob7m]

Было бы значительно более интересно, информативно и полезно, если бы были всплывающие уведомления о крупных исторических событиях, из-за которых данная динамика менялась.

[@loading1057]

​@@Sergey___K00t куча стран отделилась, была бедность и голод, люди уезжали или умирали. Вот

[@p4nd4b01]

@@Sergey___K00t Советская статистика могла нарисовать любые цифры. А сталинский тоталитаризм, милитаризм и религиозное поклонение идеологическим химерам заложили бомбу, которая через 40 лет привела к полной катастрофе, во время который чекистские дегенераты разворовали все, до чего смолги дотануться.

[@artembal1106]

​@@p4nd4b01 а сколько вообще Сталин репрессировал людей? И сколько в это же время репрессировали в других странах?

[@p4nd4b01]

​@@artembal1106 Причем тут "другие страны", если Чикатило убил и изнасиловал, значит для вас это тоже нормально? Почему вы готовы равняться на "другие страны" только в злодеяниях?

[@artembal1106]

@@p4nd4b01 а я где-то оправдывал действия Сталина действиями других стран? Нет. Просто все леваки говорят всегда ТОЛЬКО про Сталина, забывая вообще и других правителей с других стран. Ну а фигли, это ведь только в Сталинское время такое было, да? 🤦‍♀️

[@antjevanderlinden6477]

Great video, thanks. If at all possible, could you please list the background music you used? I recognize Tchaikovsky and Beethoven, but would love to know the actual "works" you used. Many thanks.

[@jamimi_629]

crazy how the numbers go down during the world wars...and that every number was a human...RIP victims

[@tsj8726]

Not only wars, look at USSR at 1929, famine when half of my nation gone.

[@NoSpeechForTheDumb]

Yeah poor people. But wait what will happen when we go on driving Russia into a corner without an honor-preserving option. Nuclear war in Europe will be much more "crazy" than those conservative wars you mentioned.

[@f1etc.438]

​@@tsj8726 you from Russia?

[@hyenalaughingmatter8103]

Wars are hoaxes 🤫

[@javiermescuaguerrero]

Not only world wars. Look at the change of URSS to Russian federation. It hits really hard.

[@DrizztCoage]

Spain feels like that game of Mario Kart where you're going well, you get hit by the blue shell, and every time you win a new position they hit you with something new each time.

[@alegp97]

I guess by blueshell you mean another war and by a red shell its people just getting tfo to america

[@KariMartikainen]

How to trust on these numbers. Anyway it´s nice. Thank You.

[@oguzbasbuyuk6833]

Great bro

[@Alsayid]

Stop to consider that only 100 years ago Czechoslovakia had a larger population than all of Turkey. Germany had more than 4.5x the population of Turkey.

[@docem43]

Wow

[@pineapplesareyummy6352]

That's very interesting. Europe industrialised first, and for a while, enjoyed a substantial population advantage over its traditional international rivals. But eventually, Asia caught up, so the numbers are settling back to a familiar ratio what it was historically.

[@Mustafa-lg2ei]

İt was hundered years ago it doesnt matter that much

[@ivayloi736]

Patriarchy in action... It's really shocking how fast a country can recover population. Albania is similar, which is also a Muslim country. In a future war, all western states will have huge issue recovering their own population. Currently they get population from outside, because of the higher standard of living. If that situation changes for some reason... a lot of western countries will disappear, since they do not reproduce even in peace time...

[@pineapplesareyummy6352]

​@@ivayloi736 You made some excellent points about the West being totally reliant on immigration to maintain its population size and economic size. But I'd argue that the fertility rate problem isn't limited to the West. We now have solid evidence from the rest of the world that once a society reaches a certain level of economic development, their fertility rate will fall below replacement. East Asia is at least as bad as the worst countries in Europe. The southern states of India aren't even fully developed, and they're below replacement. Iran is below replacement. Bangladesh is at the threshold of replacement now, but their numbers are continuing to drop so fast they will be sub-replacement like everywhere else. Even Saudi Arabia's fertility rate is now below 2.5 and falling. Over the course of this century, virtually the entire world outside of sub-Saharan Africa will reach a population peak and then start declining. The difference with the West is that they will have witnessed a significant shift in its demographic from nearly 100% European stock to, maybe, 25% Middle Eastern and African stock due to immigration policies. But assuming these mix eventually, it just mean the "European" of the future will look a bit different than the typical European 100 years ago. Maybe they will (ironically) look a bit more like a darker, more olive Roman (!!)

[@MyWorld-bi5ru]

Iyi iş çıkarmışsın dostum tebrikler 👍🇹🇷🙋‍♂️

[@andrefasching1332]

the osman empire was stagnating the whole time and you are proud? no wonder turkeys current situation is so messed up. what a weird mindset

[@MyWorld-bi5ru]

@@andrefasching1332 where are you from ?

[@andrefasching1332]

@@MyWorld-bi5ru i dont see how that could be of importance to you in any way

[@ardaafacan11]

@@andrefasching1332 You are talking about the mentality that half of the country showed in the elections that the current situation of our country is bad, but you are shaking us even though the states in Europe are here thanks to the colonies.

[@andrefasching1332]

@@ardaafacan11 Well if you say that the Votes showed how awful Turkey is currently doing, who am i to stop you? I think i can partwise agree with you regarding the election. And what does this have to do with Europe? feels like whataboutism to me

[@mels9485]

Огромное спасибо за труд !!!

[@humbatgasimov6452]

Wonderful video.

[@unzerstorbar39]

I know the HRE was rather a loose alliance than an actual country but it would've been interesting to see the numbers. Especially during the 30 years war.

[@citacitonson3791]

There is both Saxony and Habsburg monarchy. Neither of them change in the chart. Just plain wrong graph from the start.

[@waseemtahir0346]

www.youtube.com/@Info10Worldguide

[@Arltratlo]

@@citacitonson3791 kingdom of Hannover is missing, same with Hessen-Kassel! also the North German Confederation!

[@annmacuvele6742]

HRE : Holy Roman Empire Heilig Römisches Reich Deutscher Nation

[@user-bk7tr1pf1z]

Как же знали бы вы как сокращение от Святой Римской Империи звучит по русcки😂( как призыв сходить по большому в доаольно грубой форме)

[@tammo100]

Around 1850 Belgium had 1.5 times the population of the Netherlands. Around 1930 it was equal. And in 2022 the Netherlands has 1.5 times the population of Belgium.

[@trollloloololooo]

tends to happen when you invent french fries and they're not even called belgian fries

[@ellidominusser1138]

​@@trollloloololooo yes, logically.

[@youria2559]

Appeared to be another Fault, Belgium is not a country,.

[@anaut1coo]

and

[@silentwitness7132]

@@youria2559 Well, it clearly is, so cope more.

[@usavideo5110]

Thanks bro

[@The_Duke_Of_Shipz]

I like how you show the actual names and there real territory through history instead of seeing how many people live in more on day borders.

[@22ESOUM]

I think there is an error in Ireland's population. It decreases suddenly around 1944/45 in the video. It's actually the century before when it had the famine and population decrease. Love the video.

[@anakinskywalker1982]

Sûrement une immigration vers les état unis

[@vonbeedle554]

Emigration was and still is a huge problem in Ireland. I think it's accurate. funny enough it's always landlords that cause it.

[@julianramosmartin7540]

The video don't is the people the Europe,sorry don't speak much inglish i from Spain

[@bernardozanchin9252]

this guy probably got a bit confused with the 8 and the 9 in 1844 and 1944

[@kinseyeire]

noticed that too. he must have got the dates wrong

[@ruznaupozorneni]

I wonder how it's possible according to this graph during the 30-years war 1618-1648 all countires' population is constantly growing while it's said that the population of Europe during that time was decreased by 1/3.

[@user-wl9cn5kw1e]

It's just a drawing, an automatic graph. It is not yet clear how to display discrete values. In Europe, besides the war, there was also an epidemic of the plague. And only thanks to the potato she was able to recover from the severe consequences of wars and famine.

[@MiguelLopez-mu1ss]

Is there a data set available?

[@sindbad8411]

There have been several videos recently playing Ludwig VanBeethoven "Egmont Overture"

[@denislavdochev3783]

Incredible video. It shows very accurately the fact that the 9th million Bulgarian was neever born.

[@kingnamcy397]

Now I know why its called the ottoman century

[@thepebblesexplore83]

The fact the 6th and 7th with a combined 13million pop took on the 2nd, 3rd, 4th with a combined 63million + others like Sweden is nuts.

[@robertsleigh1]

Population seems to go up from 1618 - 1648 (Thrirty Years' War) - that can't be right.

[@jasperfromming6633]

Idk on a strategic scale having the whole HRE instead of seperate states would have been more interresting but i appreciate the effort put into this

[@shibainu559]

Ottomans are really underrated and portrayed underpowered. In 1500s it was just a fucking powerhouse. Ottomans defeated Hungary in 1526 in two hours, and then defeated Austria in 1529 to get Budin. Than 1532 Ottomans showed its dominance again and Austria accepted itself as a lower state than Ottomans, accepting that the Austrian king is only equal to ottoman grand vizier, which in itself was a huge thing. European kings accepted that they are just equal to ottoman vizier and the sultan was superior to them all(Austria was the Holy Roman Empereror at that time, so ottomans werent just fighting austria). Austria lost more land in 1541 and 1543 and 1566, and wien was besieged but the siege were halted because of weather and unprepareness, there was no army standing on way. Ottomans defeated a spanish-led fleet in 1541 Preveze and captured all to way to morocco, and spanish city states locating in Africa. Not even a single battle were lost. And there was no army even just fighting ottomans at this point, they just hid in cities and there was nothing in way to domination of all germany militarily. The vizier being an equal to Holy Roman king is just magnificying, i don't think this level of dominance would be seen again in political history. Ottoman Kings were accepted as an higher level king by european states and they didn't had the courage to face them with an army, they just hid in cities and payed money to the ottoman king to not attack them.(In Ottomans the grand vizier had no real authority or aristocratic impact. In fact ottomans were at that time was notorious to kill their grand viziers.) In 1571 Ottomans had their first significiant loss against westerners and their fleet got burned. What they did? They just rebuilded another one and forced the westerners and cede land. They defeated Persia a few years later and got all the way to Tebriz. 1593-1606 war was a draw, but Ottomans still managed to gain land and money, but the Austrian king was accepted equal to the Sultan after 60 years. This war happened an era of instability in Ottomans, especially revolts in Anatolia. In 1663-1664 Ottomans defeated Austria yet again gaining even more land. Than they got on to defeat poland in 1672-1676. After a few border clashes Russia officially accepted the west of ukraine as ottoman land in 1681, making ottoman continue west of dnieper. To this point Ottoman had no losts. You can count 1571 as one, but i would call a draw because Cyprus were more crucial than ships, and Ottomans just rebuilded the ships anyway. Also there was the persia thing which saw Ottomans destroy Safavid empire and get baghdad tabriz and all kurd turkey, but then they striked back and got tebriz and baghdad, but it ended with ottomans getting baghdad back and than there was a treaty. In 1683-1699 all came crashing down. The problem was Ottomans at that point didn't made a land war in a big scale for a lot of time now. So they were most experienced at sieges. At the Great Turkish War Russia, Poland, HRE and Spain grouped against Ottomans after a loss at Wien. At that point europeans were ahead at war strategies and technology, and the european coalition managed to beat Ottomans finally. This was the first significiant defeat Ottomans had lol, against whole europe. And even in this time they just didn't even think of collapsing Ottomans, Ottomans just lost Hungary, south greece and azov with some ukrainean land which were vassal. Ottomans managed to defeat Russia in 1712, than recapture south greece, than lost to Austria at 1718, than defeated Russia+Austria at 1739. In the end they got Azov+South Greece back. People think that 1600s Ottoman were way too behind of spain or russia in power, but this is merely orientalism. Ottomans were the dominant state at 1500s, but they still was the most strong state in 1600s. Both economically and militarily Ottomans were the most powerful state of 1600s, and only lost that seat after 1740's in my eyes. The thing that crashed Ottomans were not european military. Ottomans just won all wars and there was no armies at some point because they know they would lose. But internal problems, mismanagement and bad economy just collapsed Ottomans. Still, as a kurd i look them with fascination. This type of dominance were only surpassed by Romans. Especially the equity of the vizier to king portrays the domination. So, Ottomans weren't just the sick man of europe in 1600s or 1700s. They were still a powerhouse and one of the strongests if not the strongest to 1740s.

[@j-ch8787]

Strange enterprise. Could be interesting to know more about how these populations were numbered in this study. Consedering all borders changes... Minorities inclided in vaster empires or countries. Through centuries. Nevertheless it s interesting. It allows to fix some quantities per country that we generally ignore especially diring 16 and 17 centuries. But checking on maps with areas of living and population numbers is a true necessity. Same as for usa population through 4 centuries. I noticed there was no arabic / muslim migration post 2d WW. Tks.

[@williampennjr.4448]

How do you make a list like this? How does anyone even begin to estimate the population of any country more than a hundred years ago let alone exact amounts over 400 years, and every year since.

[@Yiersan-cq3jm]

Музыкальное сопровождение шикарное. люблю классику.

[@certifiedblackman]

Where did you find the numbers for nazi germany 1941-1945?

[@pineapplesareyummy6352]

He could have just added the populations in occupied territories minus estimated war deaths. It wouldn't be that difficult. Demograpphic estimates were already quite accurate by this time. Probably a lot harder to find accurate data on all the polities in the 17th and 18th centuries.

[@antik529]

Why u take music from Kaiserreich?)

[@Tukemuth]

So much effort was obviously put into this! All I can say is that she's called Mother for a reason.

[@tobiwan001]

Great video. I'd argue that Switzerland was not a country before the Helvetic Republic in 1798 (than a vassal state of France) and only became an independent country in 1848. But that's up for debate. I don't want to go into the naming of certain countries as some are official names some only informal names. I found it surprising how big Austria-Hungary actually was.

[@kleex_the_original]

The video is wrong, there was no Swiss Confederation at that time. Formation and growth of the Old Confederation 1291-1515 Ancien Regime 1712-1798 The «French Period»: Helveticism and Mediation 1798-1814 Switzerland as a confederation of states 1814-1847 Founding and consolidation of the new Swiss federal state since 1848

[@waseemtahir0346]

www.youtube.com/@Info10Worldguide

[@GabrielSilva-cm6vp]

Totally false 😂😂

[@jhizzushdez1723]

One of the most popular applications please, including social networks

[@humbatgasimov6452]

Nice.

[@luiscuri64]

Sería más ilustrativo mostrar una imagen del mapa en cada momento.

[@arvaakuka8568]

Papal States having more people than whole Sweden in the beginning is pretty wild

[@ur-inannak9565]

When the Spanish brought potatoes to Europe the population of Sweden doubled.

[@arvaakuka8568]

@@ur-inannak9565 I'm from Finland, I remember hearing this before. Potato is very endurable in colder climates

[@andreybovykin7792]

the numbers are slightly skewed. Russian Emprire was declared in 1721, so your graph shows a century of a wrong country there.

[@benjamins8082]

Italian is exactly correct

[@TheBobVova]

doesn't matter

[@beauty-boy]

It's still called Russia.The difference is the Russian Kingdom and the Russian Empire.

[@arnelious4501]

Does the ottoman population include their whole country or just the European parts?

[@thehouseofcm]

It's surprising that England/Great Britain was so small compared to Turkey/ Russia/France/ Spain.

[@billairboy]

A bit suprised by the big difference in population size between France and England/UK at the start of 1600 and still they end up with the same size to day.

[@cam4007]

My completely uneducated guess would be that British soil isn’t nearly as fertile as France and so would be unable to sustain as great a population. Until the Industrial Revolution and the British global empire happened, and then wealth poured into the island. That probably allowed a population growth in the 19th century that largely equalised the two nations. Just a guess though.

[@erwannthietart3602]

​@@cam4007 its exactly that actually, although its mostly the Agricultural revolution that brought UK to grow quickly alongside the economical growth and the fact that Frances natural growth past 1850's was ALREADY stagnating due to not having a true agricultural revolution (like the only reason it took so long to be caught up by the rest was because of its huge headstart and because it actively welcomed European immigrants till the 1930's and then 1970's when these migrants became mostly non European suddenly causing more... cultural problems for some reason lol

[@user-ti6xm4rz4f]

​@@cam4007вы не уточнили за счет чего в Британию хлынуло богатство.Индия и Китай знают ,их ограбила Британия

[@Liam-2345]

@@user-ti6xm4rz4fGet over it. 🙄 Go dig them up and give them a good spanking if you wish

[@lollius88]

​@@user-ti6xm4rz4f so what? Money is money! its china and india's fault for not having the military and technological competence to defend their riches from a tiny wet island on the other side of the globe with a population a hundred times less!

[@Bayard1503]

You know you put the United Principalities around 1860 on the chart... but maybe Wallachia should have been there for a long time already?? They didn't just gain those 4 million of out nowhere.

[@yarickshabotov5007]

What the is of music on 13:38 Tell plz

[@HunterShows]

Number one complaint, when a country's government changes, its people don't randomly decrease. Only the name and flag change. So the bar isn't a different bar.

[@user-ix6rs7wv2j]

Не всегда это происходит так, как вы говорите. Во многих случаях вы правы, но иногда смена названия страны и правительства происходит одновременно со сменой границ (исчезновение Австро-Венгрии, Нацистской Германии или СССР например).

[@HunterShows]

@@user-ix6rs7wv2j Man I thought they closed the troll farm down. Endut, hoch hech.

[@rgbvlc3878]

In 1809, the Duchy of Warsaw had a population of about 4.3 million. So it should be on the chart

[@orrismate139]

It was not really a independand country. Just a toy for Napoleon to invade Russia

[@rgbvlc3878]

@@orrismate139 Yeah, as well as other countries included in this chart, for example, the kingdom of Naples or the countries entering the Rhine Confederation

[@Har1ByWorld]

@@orrismate139 this "toy" of Napoleon was and independand country with its own constitution that won a war 1v1 vs your beloved austria germ*n.

[@brahand]

Thank you for an interesting video. Do anyone have an answer to why Sweden increased like hell late 1600 and decreased like hell in the beginning of 1700?

[@brahand]

And the from 1720 increase like hell again?

[@lanne9938]

more than a million swedes immigrated to usa during those times im pretty sure

[@plumebrise4801]

From 1700 to 1721 ,there was the Great Northern War ,where from example ,1/3 of the population of Poland died during this war . During this war ,there was 25 000 Swede dying in battle + 175 000 dying due to famine and diseases ,The population of Sweden in 1700 was estimated at 1 485 000 . So 200 out of 1 485 is 13.47% of the population Edit :1 485 000 from the territories of today's Sweden ,but it Sweden was much larger at the time so in the video they have population from those territories added to their .

[@ChoosterYT]

Emigration didn’t happen by any significant numbers until 19th centrury. The most likely answer is that Sweden lost most landholdings in Germany and Balticum as a result of the great northern war. Likewise when Russia annexed Finland

[@joeljustjazzing]

The north war?

[@MrValgard]

dat music drop on 1st Poland partition xd

[@samuelesierra]

can please somebody explain tome what is happen with france¿. like, they were a kindon and ten republic, and then a kingdom an the republic again.

[@SorbusAucubaria]

I find it incradulous that Kingdom of sweden didn't have population decline 1695-1697, when third of the Finns died due famine and disease. I believe it was hard on other countries ( rest of Sweden and Baltics) as well, but it hit Finns especially hard. It is estimated that over 140 000 finns died during that period, when the population of Finland before that was about 500 000. So Kingdom of Sweden should have had population decline showing during that time.

[@antiukrnazi]

It was a genocide of Fins by the Swedes.

[@user-ti6xm4rz4f]

Финны были под гнетом Швеции,практически их рабами.Вас освободила Россия,но вы неблагодарные и неблагородные люди,вот так отблагодарили нас.

[@firegirl24]

the Swedes treated the Finns like animals and probably did not count the number of dead Finns

[@Ganz_einfach]

The solution is very simple. All these figures, at least until the mid-19th century, are completely fictitious. not true.

[@matyy_.]

1918 be like -Hello there "noises" - General Piłsudski

[@sapiasdagda4938]

marshall chuju

[@thelonewolf498]

The music sounds like the metal heart from dimmu borgir

[@hortensiablanc4352]

Si l on maitrise l histoire de l europe (continent) ont realise les consequences sur le peuple, des alliances entre royautes ou pertes suite a des conflits. Bravo pour ce travail.

[@nirvang8197]

its crazy how england changed its name for 5-6 times but not its population rank

[@Mister__Jey]

England? You may United Kingdom and I don't see the name changing i think you refer to the French Empire of the French Republic and so on

[@Mister__Jey]

And Germany had also so much different names, I don't know why you came up with England

[@Qualimar]

Crazy to think Ireland once had three times as many people as Denmark and Norway *combined*. Today it is about 7 million on the island of Ireland (5 million in the Republic and 2 million in Northern Ireland) vs. 11.2 million for Denmark and Norway (5.8 in Denmark, 5.4 in Norway.)

[@j.obrien4990]

well when your neighbor practices genocide against Gaels (Irish and Scottish) it tends to have a negative impact on your population.

[@jensonthebastard]

​@@j.obrien4990 so what you are saying is that my big strong ancestors genocide your little weak ancestors? and you expect me to be ashamed of that? lol QUITE the opposite in fact, didn't the Irish used to raid Britain for slaves? wasn't st Patrick a slave? looks like a case of what goes around comes around also the English abolished slavery btw :)

[@kekeke8988]

Deliberate genocide by England.

[@sasukeuchiha2927]

@@j.obrien4990 los paises nordicos van a desaparecer si ustedessiguen asi,ustedes necesitan hijos si no quieren ser remplasados por musulmanes,en los paises pobres las mujeres tienen hasta 4 hijosporque ustedes que tienen mas oportunidades y recursos,no se esfuerzan en tener mas hijos?

[@j.obrien4990]

@@sasukeuchiha2927 hasta ahora los musulmanes no han sido un gran amenaza a mi gente, pero los pinche ingleses si.

[@voineadmihai]

You forget about Romania,in the 1990 there were about 23mil

[@vojtechlansky86]

Suprised by: Czechoslovakia had larger population than Turkey at one point The massive population difference England and France had until the industrial revolution

[@erwannthietart3602]

Well TBF France WAS the most populated Country of Europe (beside Russia WITH Asia, without was a bit less unless you had Poland Lithuania in perhaps, and the Ottomans) For an enormous time, it already had 20 million people during Louis XIV and had like 8 times the population of the United Province or smt. Ironically the industrial revolution saw the UK catch up mostly because France DIDNT grow much ever since the second half of the XIXth century, most of the population growth afterward till the baby boom in the 60's 70's and even after was due to migration. Like yea France was already welcoming millions of immigrants from Italy, Belgium, Spain, Portugal etc... for a long long time and not just for work but also because its slow population growth meant it needed to keep up smh

[@cqpp]

​​​@@erwannthietart3602 the Holy Roman Empire had a lot more people than France and had the largest population in Europe and 3rd in the world until the 30 years war from 1618-1648 where about 33% of the German population died the death toll is about 8 millions out of the 24 million inhabitants it had at the start of the century. Unfortunately this video begins after the 30 years war when much of the German population had died with some towns and cities even losing over 90% of their population and now spending the rest of the centuries recovering that population until the industrial revolution.

[@erwannthietart3602]

@@cqpp true but the HRE is a entity that federates many country and after Protestantism good luck ruling half of your subjects that pretty much only cares if it serves their interests. France is a single country, it wouldnt need to call in all other imperial states to mobilise and fight, or to mobilise to pay extra taxes exceptionnally, because everything it rules upon is part of the Kingdom directly

[@Ercan-cy3we]

Turkey has a larger population today because of immigration, 70% of all citizens of turkey have a immigrant background.

[@azzking9305]

That’s not even counting how many Brit’s moved overseas during that time

[@burakustun5755]

The Ottoman Empire ruled for 700 years from 1299 to 1922. It is one of the largest and longest-running empires in the world. It had lands in 3 continents such as Europe, Asia and Africa. With the disintegration of the Ottoman Empire, the Turkish State was established. Today, only Istanbul is the largest city in Europe with a population of over 20 million according to unofficial figures.

[@MySmallWorld.]

Ok.What is your point ?.1500's Istanbul was the most populated city in the world.

[@user-ed5tn2cu1y]

Bruh. Lool at the Britain:all contonents were under England.also France and Russia were pretty good

[@Corvus-IXxs]

You mean konstantinopel

[@ali_guidoferrariseverogullari]

​@@Corvus-IXxsand yes what happened to königsberg. Ops sorry it must kaliningrad

[@Corvus-IXxs]

@@ali_guidoferrariseverogullari 🤣🤣🤣

[@sulaak]

What happened to Scotland? In 1626, Scotland's population was 904,480, England was just over 4.7 million, today Scotland's population is 5 million, and England's population is 60 million

[@MrTekeshi]

Scots do not like sex.

[@garyyoung3179]

Mostly Geography is what happened. The majority of Scotland's population lives in the central lowland belt. The highlands and islands were just too remote and rugged to support a huge population and indeed were greatly depopulated during the 19th century. Sheep replaced people.

[@sender5804]

didn't have babies

[@jzlnz]

Is Ottoman population count only on European side or both ?

[@ggplay737]

How is Kazakhstan?

[@myentertainment55]

Who is also shocked how massive Ukraine. More than 50 millions after they left Soviet Union 😮 Sadly it shrunk so much due to immigration to Europe and Russia. So technically 25 millions of Ukrainians live now in Russia and Europe. Crazy to think about it.

[@hatamotomoto]

Failstate

[@user-ro4hp2gw6x]

Какой труд! Несколько веков истории, много поколений людей за 15 минут - завораживает!

[@belirsiz4750]

I love watching numbers

[@sergey_ilushin]

great video! but I have some comment for improvement. Russian Empire had different flag. Russian modern flag was not even invented back there.

[@arctix4518]

German Empire in 1871: "Lemme just step right in!"

[@Denkwuerdigkeiten]

great video. but it's called "Brandenburg-Prussia", not "Bradenburg-Prussia".

[@drrizzla4557]

when you take a look at french population just before and during the 1789 Revolution (and before the maximum extension of Bonaparte's Empire which artificially increase the population) you understand why all the kingdoms of Europe had to join their forces to fight France.

[@jerome2418]

La masse fait souvent le rapport de force, on commence à le voir avec les pays africains.

[@j-ch8787]

​ Oui.. Mais la masse devient souvent en demographie un handicap... Surtout combinée a d autres facteurs. C est pourquoi ces questions analysées de façon lineaire et statique comme trop souvent relevent d une betise crasse. Comme tous les domaines d analyses du réel de nos jours on doit y reflechir avec des modeles multi factoriels... En analyse multi dimensionnels. Le cas de la chine est un bon exemple en ce moment. Idem pour les usa ou certaines communautés crient a la noyade sous l invasion d autres ethnies (les afro us submergeant les "blancs", or on est loin du point de bascule aux usa). En russie idem sans meme envisager un eclatement de cette federation les popovs sont tres mal pour les 20 a 30 prochaines années... Bref la demographie c est complexe. Et les "nostradamus" n y ont pas voix au chapitre.

[@drrizzla4557]

@@j-ch8787 effectivement la démographie est un facteur, une "donnée" qui a certes son poids indéniable dans l'histoire mais qui n'explique rien seule et qui n'est pas utilisable sans contexte plus large.

[@j-ch8787]

@@drrizzla4557 C est ce que je tentais de rappeler. "la masse" ne fait pas tout. Ma Oma (gd mere) me parlait souvent du "containment" / la contenue / le combat contre les slaves par les germains depuis la chute de rome. Ils se battaient a 1 contre 10 mais... 9 fois 10, les slaves se sont fait ecrasés ou au moins serieusement echarpés. C est pourquoi me disait ma Oma les latins ne comprennent rien aux popovs : ils n ont jamais eté vraiment confrontés militairement culturellement ou commercialement a leur proximité et concurrence territoriale.

[@rewdwarf123]

I can see why Great Britain/UK stayed out of the major land battles when France, Russia and Austria (Hapsburgs) were much bigger countries.

[@kurtakurtovic3645]

Do you calculate immigrants?

[@serbianstallion8321]

It’s sad how in 1923 Yugoslavia and Turkey had just about the same number of inhabitants now 100 years later all of ex-yu countries have less than 19m people and Turkey has 90m people.

[@Ercan-cy3we]

70% of this 90 million citizens of turkey have a immigrant background this is why.

[@Turk_From_Malta]

We do more sex then others buddy that's all

[@ilhan8042]

Why

[@zottirgen]

That's why your countries have better quality people and Turkey has a horde of minimum wage workers. It's not a bad thing to have less population

[@cos59]

Keşke Türkiye sadece 50-60 Milyon arasında kalsaydı. Çok nüfus iyi değil. Ayrıca 15Milyon mülteci var Türkiyede. Eğer Türkiyede iç savaş cikarsa, mülteciler yüzünden o zamn bütün Avrupa da bunun bedelini öder. Avrupa'daki TÜRKLER orayı da yakar.

[@LHMarielle]

Interesting video. The french first republic shouldn't be displayed. Interesting to use "July Monarchy" when it was technically still the Kingdom of France without king of France. Shouldn't the Duchy of Savoy come back from the kingdom of Sardinia at some point, unless it had too few population?

[@milanfanas]

The difference between Italy and France increased dramatically since the end of XX century

[@dayros2023]

That’s mass immigration to France.

[@tifusin]

Immigration :(

[@Friton3v1]

Of course, you don't make chidren.

[@emptyhad2571]

@@tifusin unification of Italy and Germany is one major factor

[@stomil]

The official name of the country was Kingdom of Poland and Grand Duchy of Lithuania. It was referred to in Latin as Regnum Poloniae Magnusque Ducatus Lithuaniae. Since the 17th century, in international relations, it was usually known as the Most Serene Republic of Poland, Serenissima Res Publica Poloniae

[@emreaydn6381]

Turkey's comeback 😯

[@EmisoraRadioPatio]

Spain had a larger population than all the Ottoman Empire, wow

[@mamacojackson9019]

This video does not consider America

[@RCubes]

​@mamacojaickson9019 I guess he means the population of both in XIX century

[@stanilavitalie1199]

Nice Video, but there is another country after 1991 soviet union collapse, Moldova, which is located between Romania and Ukraine

[@hatamotomoto]

And Republic Transdnistria

[@Tee2000DE]

There are several inaccuracies. Around the year 1795, the population of Poland fell below one million, which is not true. The number of Poles around the year 1800 was approximately 10 million.

[@theonesillyboy]

not sure if you're trolling or confused.... well, Poland-Lithuanian state ceased to exist in 1795 ... so it's not displayed and the population seems to be split and included in the Russia/Prussia/Habsburg states. you can actually see the dip in P-L populations and raise in neighbours' around 1st and 2nd partition too

[@Tee2000DE]

@@theonesillyboy You're right. I meant more about the region of Poland. In fact, when it comes to statehood itself, then Poland was not.

[@yacky489]

Spanish empire left the chat 🇪🇸

[@sylviemille8077]

Vers la fin de la seconde guerre mondiale, je n’ai pas vu la population de l’’URSS considérablement chuter. Ils ont tout de même eu + de 11 millions de soldats tués et, il me semble, un total de + de 27 millions de victimes.

[@Anonymous-qj3sf]

L'URSS avait un taux de natalité très élevé et a rapidement rattrapé les pertes et a continué à augmenter sa population immédiatement après la Seconde Guerre mondiale.

[@Anonymous-qj3sf]

L'URSS avait un taux de natalité très élevé et a rapidement rattrapé les pertes et a continué à augmenter sa population immédiatement après la Seconde Guerre mondiale.

[@Face-mo4lz]

in 1675 the number of Ottomans was 45 miles, what 30??? Where do you get this information from?

[@humbatgasimov6452]

Good.