🔥 గ్రూప్ 1 కేసు,G.O.29 పై TGPSC కి హై కోర్టు నోటీసులు 🔥

[@avinashpalaparthi8546]

So what is the issue..?? I just hope the advocate, representing petitioners, have clarity of what he wants. If the government so through amendment brings about a change, how is it illegal..?? Is it wrong on the part of government to accommodate more open category students..??if yes, do we have any judgments asking not to..?? if there are judgments about "Shortfall vacancy method" why is the advocate not quoting them. Also, one of the reason for HC quashing the Prelims examination second time was due to the not taking biometric attendance as per said Notification. That is, as government did not follow as mentioned in the Notification, it is quashed. Now, the notification was amended and Government has done as per said notification, so on what grounds is the advocate asking for the HC to put a stay on conducting Mains and release a fresh list..?? PS: I am not here in support of Government or Students, but want to know what is the actual issue here.

[@sairahulPorandla]

As per SC guidelines in any reservation policy, open category should accomodate all category people, not just OC people, for the same, first 1:50 people needs to be taken out irrespective of category, but here TSPSC has considered taking out category wise people from starting itself, leading to imbalance in recruitment. Reservation candidates are taken - 1:50 ratio strictly Wherein open category taken in 1:66 ratio, which itself is violation of GO 29.