Gravitational acceleration

[@MTmultipletechnology]

BEST Physics TEACHER IN WORLD ( THAKUWA ) KE LIYE PADHAI KI SIR NE 😊 KON KON SIR SE INSPIRE HAI LIKE Karo sir ke struggle ke liye

[@priyabratadash381]

There is a concept called Active Gravitational force and passive gravitational force. Active gravitational force accounts for the gravitational field strength of a massive object, whereas passive gravitational force accounts for how other objects gravitate in the gravitational field of the former one. The concept of acceleration due to gravity comes in the category of passive gravitational force. F= Ma or a= F/M . An interesting thing here is that in an active gravitational field the force acting on any mass is proportional to its mass and every time the ratio between force to mass taken, the result arrives is a constant, which is the acceleration due to gravity. Another important thing is that, when two bodies are gravitationally interacting, one with extreme larger mass (M) like earth and other with smaller mass(m) stone , the force between them is equal and opposite but due mass difference the stone will accelerate towards earth with constant acceleration of appreciable magnitude(roughly 9.8 ms^-2) whereas the acceleration of earth although constant towards the stone is so negligence to be detected. But between the sun (with extremely larger mass compared to earth) and earth the centripetal acceleration of earth towards the sun is of great magnitude. Simple formula: F= M A =ma, if F is constant then for M>>m, A

[@onetwothreefour56789]

HC Verma sir ko sikha raha hai kya tu.....😂

[@priyabratadash381]

@@onetwothreefour56789 tujhe bhi sikha raha hu khachhar 😊

[@KRISHNASHARMA-pn1pg]

Emotional damage

[@shivanidixit8932]

Your way of explaining is so awesome sir!! Thankyou for this informative video 😊

[@Maskedhelm1]

Love u sir ji ur the one of the best Indian educators of all time but I didn't read ur book because it's too complex for my simple mind to understand हमारे लिए KZbin पर हर समय उपलब्ध रहने और सभी भारतीय प्रतिभाशाली दिमागों के लिए आपकी जिज्ञासा उत्पन्न करने के लिए धन्यवाद सर

[@HashBiker]

Legend who will remain alive for centuries through his videos

[@bhavishyagupta8032]

Sir I request you to take physics classes for classes 11-12 regularly . 😃 We would love that .😀🙏. Huge Respect Sir🙏

[@AdarshSingh-ls6ll]

bro he is a great physicist and a scientist not your teacher who would take classes for jee/neet grow up lil bro

[@bhavishyagupta8032]

@@AdarshSingh-ls6ll bro i agree to you i only made a request and i have met sir in kanpur university previous season so i know his grandeur as im from kanpur only i request him to explain topics of his book concepts of physics written by him😀

[@AdarshSingh-ls6ll]

@@bhavishyagupta8032 as a student doing his physics major I would like him to make lectures on higher physics that so that I can share it to my foreign friends also haha

[@isohel9889]

@@AdarshSingh-ls6ll But he's so humble unlike many people

[@bhavishyagupta8032]

​@@AdarshSingh-ls6ll yupp you can ❤ i am no one to interrupt😊

[@AnshPathak2005]

2 most beloved teachers jinki voice ekdam calm h aur pure din sunne ka man krta h: Vikas divyakirti sir & hcv sir

[@_navamusic3054]

Pure Gold Teacher of Physics ❤️❤️ and not a Bussiness Minded teachers like nowadays (like physics wala, unacademy etc)

[@ROHU-uq2rg]

​​@@sandeepchawla-of4si agr spelling check krne ki jagah pdhlo to bohot kuch mil jaega bss har jagah PW krne se kaam nhi chalta

[@indian-jc5bo]

​@@ROHU-uq2rg correct 💯

[@Rudrature]

​@@sandeepchawla-of4si fir to HC verma diamond hai bro...tum nhi samjhoge....

[@Rudrature]

​@@sandeepchawla-of4si jinke pass paise nhi unke liye kya krenge pw etc

[@deadrage2703]

Bhai unko sarkar itna Paisa deti hai ki unko jarurat bhi nhi.....unko pasand hai padhana isiliye wo padha dete hai

[@aayush554]

sir you taught my teacher and your teachings are reflected back in very beautiful way.

[@RajpalSingh-nh6zs]

Great sir we have read from your book 15 year ago... it is great to see u in person

[@kunalsharma-pb3qd]

He really makes videos in Hindi🔥🔥🔥....so much respect

[@al-rahman26]

sir please upload videos on tough topics of physics for the student who wants to crack IIT JEE. Please Sir, the way you are explaining is best LOVE YOU SIR

[@SandeepSingh-ki7gs]

Professor HC Verma teaches physics in general and not in specific like for IIT JEE or NEET

[@atharvakulkarni1892]

Bhai hc verma padh le

[@muhammadislam5138]

Apple Force ( formerly known gravitational force ) draws any object to its center ( and here, the surface of the earth is not center but the resting place with specific Apple Force power consumption ) at the same acceleration rate of 9.8 meter per second but gets squired when a falling mass holds up the Apple Force motion incrementally in same manner, reaching towards the distance to its center until gets obstructed or being at rest, to which the earth planet is being compacted. Either the earth or any object falling towards it doesn't attract each other rather they are compacted with specific Apple Force power.

[@Shubham_Mishra166]

Sir you r always evergreen 🙏

[@arnavspecial]

It's basically acceleration due to gravity (denoted by g) acting irrespective of object's mass

[@Ignitit]

This man is legendary.

[@skylar5674]

Yes concept with the situation mentioned is very important at what condition mentioned is upmost important in derived expression ❤️

[@aayush780]

I was studying about metals and conductors right now. Thanks for the information 4:16.

[@heimito9657]

Yes, i also in gauss law

[@RohitKumar-qi5od]

When I listen to you sir my mind becomes so calm. thank you so much sir .

[@hcverma2928]

So nice. Understanding science is a divine feeling.

[@AvaneeshSaurabb578]

​@@hcverma2928 Sir channel is really your's

[@satyendraprajapati8886]

Aap jaisa physicist India ko kabhi nahi milega

[@athvii]

kyu

[@SandhyaSengar-ol9rk]

​@@athvii 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@backbencher9449]

Milega bhai Agla mai hi hu😂😂 Be positive as soon as possible 😊😊

[@Neeraj-mo4vf]

I also have a que . light is electromagnetic waves it doesn't have colours in it .. then is light a mixture of waves whose wavelength are 380-450 nm ,,, 450-495 nm ,,,495-570 nm ,,,570-590 nm ,,,590-620 nm,,,620-750 nm .. as many teachers say apple appears red because it absorb all colours except red . but light do not have colours in it .. then it should absorb different waves that are in light ..but light is wave itself then how light has different waves in it

[@ambergupta5531]

Superb Sir... Huge respect 🙏

[@OmYadav-h7d]

Apke darshan pakar dhanya ho gya sir 🙏🙏🙏

[@adityasinha5853]

Means for a freely falling body we are taking g as it's relative 'acceleration'

[@infinityeducation4all]

Such a humble person❤😍

[@karanveersingh2864]

We can also understand this by examining the equation of gravitational field strength i.e. acceleration due to gravity...

[@jaiho-pankajkumar]

I always learn something from your videos sir😊😊😊😊

[@UdayKantPandey-nh4ou]

Sir can you tell us why does the acceleration due to gravity not depend upon the mass of the object ... Not mathematically... But practically

[@the__Harshraz]

Point 1: Understanding Mass and Inertia The mass of an object determines its inertia, which is its resistance to changes in motion. An object with a smaller mass requires less force to achieve a certain acceleration, while a more massive object needs a significantly greater force to attain the same acceleration. In simple terms, the heavier the object, the harder it is to start or stop its motion. Practical Example: Take two objects, like stones or books-one smaller and one larger (with noticeably higher mass than the first). Try pushing both. What do you feel? The object with higher mass requires more force to move, doesn’t it? That’s inertia in action. Point 2: Now, imagine you drop those two objects (one heavy and one light) from a certain height. What will happen to them due to Earth’s gravitational pull? Close your eyes and picture it. What do you see? (A) The heavier object will experience a stronger gravitational pull because of its larger mass. However, its greater mass will also make it resist acceleration more. (B) The lighter object, having less mass, will technically achieve higher acceleration. But since it has less mass, the gravitational pull on it will be weaker. Conclusion: As a result, both objects-regardless of their mass-will end up with the same acceleration due to gravity.

[@priyanshupal3629]

You are my inspiration sir ❤

[@mathsfoundation3500]

Sir u are a great teacher..please write a book on maths also....like concept of physics...🙏🙏

[@iqbn1275]

My name is jatin Kumar from faridabad haryana . I am preparing for neet 2025. Wave theory says that When a black body is heated then the intensity of flame increase not the color change. Particle theory says that intensity has no impact of temperature, it says that the freq increases and leads to the change in color. And in the ncert of class 11 chem . It is written - when an iron rod is heated in furnace it is initially dull red but as temp inc. it becomes bright or dark red . ( Wave theory) But in the next line it is written that the color change from red to blue. So my doubt is that here both theory are used and could not justify that intensity inc. or color change

[@basujain8928]

Luv you sir from heart❤❤❤❤❤❤you are god of physics

[@Meenar2507]

Lot's of Gratitude Sir ji❤

[@RoshniKashyap-t2z]

❤❤best teacher in physics

[@kumarvivekranjan8663]

Then Earth creates a kind of force like electrostatic force which attracts the objects towards its. And it is responsible for gravitational acceleration for that particular object only. But one question I have, is it same acceleration for every objects due to gravity. Please explain...🙏🏻

[@AnmolAgarwalCreates]

I kinda don’t understand what you are trying to ask I guess you want to ask if the acceleration due to gravity and acceleration of a object due to earth’s gravitational field are the same thing Answer- Yes they both are the same!

[@abdulreyhan9760]

That is why we say, half knowledge is even more dangerous . Whenever we know any result of nature, underlined conditions must be known very well..

[@rabindramishra5209]

Sir please explain "potential difference between the two points" and "electric potential of a point" and necessity of these

[@msumankumar951]

See potential means degree of unstability means if I have a spring which is fixed at one end and I have not done anything to that spring then it is in its normal or stable state or 0 potential but when I stretch it I disturbed from its normal state , at that point it has some degree of unstability and that is called as potential.

[@Knowledgepolyhedron]

Sir your explanation is better than your book 😅 Love you Sir 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

[@hcverma2928]

This is direct answer to a question by a student. Natural.

[@krantikumarlilhare1608]

Sir apki smile bahut acchi h New member in your KZbin family

[@hcverma2928]

Welcome.

[@djgoswami360]

आध्यात्मिक की दृष्टि से उत्तर दिया गया गुरुजी ने। 🙏

[@Hey_Ananyasingh]

He'll proffesor hc varma , I am ananya Kumari I read in class 10 those who try never give up, It is gravity and g= gm and do the quality and depend of gravity and law of motion and they the look here and gravity and gravitational system To took here and they depend mass it constant value 0:29 🙏🙏

[@Kiddycafe]

The question is really😃😄😆🖒🖒

[@satyamverma8932]

Respected sir, Could you please explain the below confusion: 👇 What is the actual linear magnification produce by a biconvex lens of sun which is at infinity? In this question we got two answers by using formula 1 :- magnification = v/u formula 2:- magnification = Hi/Ho

[@meharpreetsingh4115]

"Suppose we have 2 celestial bodies of equal mass and dimensions . If the are apart by some distance which is as good as for them to collide. This is a case for a line . But if there are 3 , 4 , 5 , n ... celestial bodies of same mass and dimensions , and are arranged in a regular polygon , like equilateral triangle , square , etc . Then will they collide or not as each of them is holding the other with same force ? Do the system stood stil or revolve in a circular manner and how and why? This is a case of 2D , we can also think for 3D like cube with each body at each of its corners. This also means that this system could survive in also dimensions, except 1D . Is it true or not ? Please solve my doubt sir .

[@vivekbhawsar77882]

As per My Knowledge they all planets in described cases will collide at same time

[@das.arghyadeep]

Sir -ve × -ve = +ve why , I am Arghya from West Bengal, Kolkata, aslo sir your book concept of physics is awesome, there is no book in theory that can beat this (now) ❤❤❤

[@xyz7_12]

It can be explained by number line..(.class 6 UP board) Change ur board.

[@das.arghyadeep]

@@xyz7_12 Hello don't criticize a board. Every board is good. Some board is few better but other board not to be criticized. Keep it in your mind 😉

[@mitrayusinha9810]

N.B. - Does energy flow through wire ? If I have a wire 12 lakh km long (6 km +ve , 6 km -ve ) , then will it take 4 sec to light a bulb or just instantly?

[@aman_sp03]

This question was actually answered by veritasium in a series of two videos. You will get the best conceptual understanding there. m.kzbin.info/www/bejne/pXrCiWWZgq2Bm5I

[@donno9984]

Instantly drift speed

[@mitrayusinha9810]

@@donno9984 can you explain

[@AnmolAgarwalCreates]

@@mitrayusinha9810 There are free electrons in the whole wire [ assuming the wire to be a good conductor] and since as you said it’s positively charged in one half and negatively charged in second half then there would be an electric field in the whole wire from positive part to negative part and electrons all over the wire will start experiencing the electric field as soon as electric field is established [ Here As soon as you get your wire positively and negatively charged , at that instant only electric field is established and electrons all over the wire start experiencing the force]. So yes you can say it’s takes negligible time to light up the bulb

[@spacetospace100]

Great 💐💐🔭🔭📡📡

[@sanidhyakumarghosal1005]

Sir aapko koti koti naman. Hare krishna 🙏

[@_MADARA_FF_OFFICIAL_]

Sir I am in class 9th and because of you I am interested in physics ❤️

[@samruddhparsekar7347]

sir mereko ek question hai jaab haam ek sphere metal ball ko heat karke red hot iron karthe hai aur usko ek ice cube pe dalthe hai vo sphere ghumne lagtha hai kya hum isko work done , heat absorbed , Thermodynamics ke madad se explain kar sakthe hai ki vo ball kithne temperature par kithne tej ghumega ya kithne dair taak ghume ga can we link the concept yo work done and thermodynamics

[@SwayamEinsteinEdits]

SIR , This Concept is also in class 10th book Sci 1 of Maharastra state Board pg no.10🎉😊

[@AJAYKUMAR-oi9ft]

Sir how does light reflect from a solid opaque surface ? Kindly describe it on sub-atomic level.

[@atom00001]

Hi satwik

[@Jagadeesh-d4z]

Sir I have a doubt. if we say a relation is a function by vertical line method in a graph. in sin and cos graph if we increase the range means multiply with a number then graph.hight increases then we use vertical line method to define function infinite points are touching it is still a function...

[@बँटेंगे_तो_कटेंगे]

।।दण्डवत प्रणाम ऋषिवर।। ।।हर हर महादेव।।

[@integration8274]

Gravitational acceleration mass pe dependent krta hai agr mass bahot jyada ho to, like agr earth pe earth ke mass ke half maas ka object gir rha ho

[@dhoomdhamaka7138]

Why we can identify that light is switched off or onn with our closed eyes ?........................................please tell us about that. Sir

[@rajeshparab1968]

I have question "If order of magnitude of any physical quantity can be expressed as A × 10n where 'A' is a number such that 0.5 ≤ A < 5 then how gravitational constant is 6.667 x 10 ^ -11 ?" I heard 2 answers 1 ) this rule is only applied to exponent between -1 and 4 2). The order of magnitude rule is a rough estimation technique, and it is not used to determine the exact values of fundamental constants like the gravitational constant. Which is correct answer. AI tools are confused on this.

[@devendravishwakarma9491]

The lord of physics God sir kya aapki book concept of physics thodi jaldi nahi aa sakte hain hindi version vol 2 please sir 🙏 Kyoki mujhe tyari aap ki book se karna hain mujhe sir department of basic science main jana hain please sir 🙏 🙏

[@Neeraj-mo4vf]

why gravitational constant has dimension. It just a number… force has dimensional formula as MLT-2 which mean it depends on mass length time .. but gravitational constant is just constant it does not depend on any .. Then how G has dimension

[@PhysicsbySatishkanojiya]

It do not depends on mass of an object in short ....very well explained sir...

[@kristena343walls]

An informative video thank you sir.

[@satyendraprajapati8886]

Sir am your big fan ❤❤

[@nidhishrivastava2352]

stone ke do sides , space ka contraction ya kahen density , alag alag jabki Earth ke dono side ek barabar , kyonki earth ne hi to space time ko contract kiya hai

[@bioledgeofficials_prabhakar]

Hello sir , I have a question , how fair is to consider mass is variant by relativity concept. Can we also say mass is dependent on frame of reference.. sir i will be highly obliged if you will guide me for this..

[@resonancegaming7404]

Bro mass is fame dependent if u go speed of light then mass changed

[@aman_sp03]

@@resonancegaming7404 not necessarily speed of light

[@mitrayusinha9810]

Mass is the measure of inertia. It should not change while changing frame of reference.

[@aman_sp03]

@@mitrayusinha9810 that’s rest mass, not relativistic mass

[@mitrayusinha9810]

@@aman_sp03 You are right. Thanks there .

[@BTSArmy-gh8wx]

Sir different objects ka different weight Hota he means earth unhe Alag Alag Force Se khichta he to acceleration to force people depend karta he to phir acceleration due to gravity Sab objects pe constant kyu rahata he jab Unke weight different he

[@Lokeshdevi207]

Sir bhotki ka jagat part 2 kab aayega 🎉

[@akhandbharat3537]

Einstein of 21st century ❤

[@viral_memes4u]

ALAKH PANDEY. STUDENT ✋ I can feel it

[@raghavmishra7240]

Sir aapse KV IIT me mil ke accha lga 🔥

[@thecivilmantcm6518]

F=mg=GmM/R2, g=GM/R2= Constant valid for near to the earth surface

[@Makstory150]

Sir I have a question that in the areas where temperature is in (-ve) the lake freezes upto some extent why it is not frozen completely we can easily find water if we dig there ??

[@xyz7_12]

Class 10 icse

[@AdarshYadav-k09]

Excellent Sir ❤❤

[@oyeemahendra]

Sir this is my QUESTION:- " AS WE know earth is moving round So if we flied helicupter above the earth surface at any certain height in India and fixed its positioning(like it's not moving it's just at a place above " ) then if continued this process amd kept our helicopter stationary (*like sometime birds are a same place neither they are moving upward,downward,back nor forth*) Will after 24 hours(* one complete rotation of earth) that same helicopter flewed in India be in America (* or any other places or countries) **ASSUMPTIONS IS** A earth is moving but helicopter isn't so it has to be sky but the ground level has to be changed *) Please reply sir.. Or any of you who understood my question and has answers Baaki sir ki smile achi lagtibhai 😊❤❤❤❤

[@locagamer5966]

Bhai wo india ke usse fix part pe hi rhega 24h ke baad bhi

[@Mitochondria312]

Helicopter Location on Earth. User If a helicopter is flew for 20 hours on stationery location at a fixed place in India, after 20 hours will it change the place as Earth rotates ? ChatGPT Yes, if a helicopter remains stationary at a fixed location on the surface of the Earth for 20 hours, it will change its location due to the rotation of the Earth. The Earth completes one rotation on its axis in approximately 24 hours. Therefore, during the 20 hours the helicopter remains stationary, the Earth rotates by approximately 20/24 or 0.833 degrees. This means that the location of the helicopter on the Earth's surface will have changed by 0.833 degrees due to the Earth's rotation. The exact distance the helicopter has moved depends on its location and the distance from the equator. The distance covered by the helicopter can be calculated using the formula: distance = (angle in degrees) x (pi/180) x (radius of the Earth) Assuming the helicopter is at the equator, which has a radius of approximately 6,371 kilometers, and the change in position due to the Earth's rotation is 0.833 degrees, the distance covered by the helicopter in 20 hours would be approximately: distance = (0.833) x (pi/180) x (6,371) = 147.8 kilometers Therefore, after 20 hours, the helicopter would have moved approximately 147.8 kilometers due to the Earth's rotation. User If a helicopter is flew for 20 hours on stationery location at a fixed place in India, after 20 hours will it change the place as Earth rotates? Which country will it be ? ChatGPT If a helicopter remains stationary at a fixed location in India for 20 hours, it will change its location due to the rotation of the Earth, as explained in my previous answer. However, the helicopter will still be in India after 20 hours, just in a slightly different location. The change in the helicopter's position due to the Earth's rotation is determined by the latitude and longitude of its initial position. Assuming the helicopter is initially located at a fixed point on the ground in India, its new position after 20 hours will still be in India, just shifted slightly due to the Earth's rotation. The exact location within India where the helicopter will end up after 20 hours depends on its initial position, as well as the latitude and longitude of that position. The change in position due to the Earth's rotation will be different for different locations within India. However, it is safe to say that the helicopter will still be within the borders of India after 20 hours, just in a slightly different location

[@oyeemahendra]

@@Mitochondria312 Thank you brother!!!

[@AnubhabLaha-oy2ch]

Great teacher of physics. 🎉🎉🎉

[@ADITYARAJ-xe5eu]

Agar metal ball aur plastic ball ko same height se giraye to same time pe girega ki different time pe ?😐

[@rajeshshrivastava6850]

Sir my question is kya diffused reflection laws of reflection ko follow karta hai agar nahi kata to hame cheeze dikhti kyu hai

[@ajay-dp2si]

Sir please tell me why we use electrostatic potential not electro variable potential

[@manthankobra]

Sir please ya batao 10/2 which is not coprime and √2 which we prove coprime in ist case we say its rational in second case we say it is irrational how ????? Please tell me if any one know

[@sushmameharia8387]

Sir was you a teacher of paradise coaching classes in 1992?

[@vivekbhawsar77882]

Sir my name is anshu Bhawsar, I am from mandsaur Madhyapradesh, My Question is that as we know that there are infinite number of possible orbits (assuming circular orbits) Of a fixed radii is possible around a heavier objects in space but that shows means there are infinite number of possibilities to create whole in space time fabric but black whole creates only One agretion disk how it is possible

[@Aryan_552]

sir i am in engineering collage but i have and even many professor and student also doubt of sign convention in gravity we take g positive or negative in down word direction me

[@Vivek-ko7xm]

GMm/R2 hota hai to simple hai a is Gm/R2 ab since m is small acceleration is small still wo Earth ka mass pe depend nahi kar rha Sahi hai!

[@shubhanshu8265]

I have a question. kya ramanujan infinite value -1/12 agar correct hai to number line pe postive side wale number infinite tak hote hai agar positive side kae sabhi numbers ko add/sum kar de to answer postive aana chahiye to phir ramanujan infinite sum -1/12 tho phir number line ke postive side postive nahi rahi. Please answers my question.

[@Neeraj-mo4vf]

light is electromagnetic waves it doesn't have colours in it .. then is light a mixture of waves whose wavelength are 380-450 nm ,,, 450-495 nm ,,,495-570 nm ,,,570-590 nm ,,,590-620 nm,,,620-750 nm .. as many teachers say apple appears red because it absorb all colours except red . but light do not have colours in it .. then it should absorb different waves that are in light ..but light is wave itself then how light has different waves in it

[@TRAYANSHU]

Bro apple have red pigments which make it appear red that would the reason i think!

[@mehasrivastava5644]

Sir , I am your great follower. Here's a question - If only colour sensitive cells inside the human eyes are able to see the colours so , what is the actual colour of the world / universe or everything is colour less ??? Sir , please answer this 👆👆👆

[@Noeticnomad0]

It's a question of understanding of basics. What is colour? It's just due to light means em wave of a range of particular frequencies. Actual colour of world is what that we are able to see. Because colour is nothing that really exist it is because humans can sense it does not mean that it exists. There is no actual colour of world because it is refrence based.

[@lostnfound1634]

Sir can you please tell the difference between Angular Acceleration and Centripetal Acceleration? Please sir its a kind request.

[@jayjeet2006_2]

Centripetal acceleration acts due to centripetal force.

[@Angeltrisha2344]

Sir the are bubbles formed in bottle in landscape view(not in portrait view) if they are formed in air they should be formed in both the cases

[@navneetyadav0024]

Sir I am 'bsc' student my question from Relativistic mechanics is that " If a body is moving with the comparable nearly equal to the velocity of light then body atten infinite mass" "I thik let us take a pen moving with velocity is equal to velocity of light then it destroy the Earth if it collide "? Please solve my doubt sir..

[@alinjacob5517]

Sir I don't know whether my doubt is Dumb or not but I am asking still. Sir, work done in moving a charge from centre of a spherical shell is 0. Since V=W/q --> V=0 at centre according to formula but charge's potential at centre is same as that of its surface. V---> Potential 'just for info'

[@tarunsuman1676]

V is not W/q , its Energy/q and W= change in Energy so if W=0 means change in energy is 0 means energy and potential is constant.

[@alinjacob5517]

@@tarunsuman1676 sorry did'nt get your point

[@shreyanshtiwari8670]

Thankyou sir!😀

[@Saifulsk834]

Agar,Mass pe dependent vi ho,tab vi earth and a small ball (Let-1Kg)per same force act hoga.because of very huge mass of earth 🌎 its acceleration is a=F/M=1.640939086×10^-24 m/s2 which tence to Zero.but for a ball 🏀 acceleration is a=F(same)/m(small)=9.8 m/s2 .this acceleration is very very high respect to earth.

[@meharpreetsingh4115]

If somehow the acceleration of both object and earth are the same . We know the force acting on both is also the same (Newton's 3rd Law ) . Therefore the mass of both the objects must have to be same to satisfy F=ma (Newton's 2nd Law ) which is not never never possible. Hence , this can be proved by contradiction method

[@HHP93]

Mere sir bhi kaha karte hai ki kisi formula ko yaad rakhne se jyada jaruri uski conditions ko yaad rakhna hota hai

[@HimanshuKumar-dg1dh]

Guru sab kahte hai ki earth gravitational force lagata hai sabhi substance par, lekin kon si chiz ke wajah se acceleration due to gravity generate hoti hai.

[@MIDNIGHTMANGA2217]

In short acceleration due to gravity "g" is taken always with respect to Our mother earth which is independent of mass ....... Main Focus should be on with respect to earth 🌎

[@Physicsarkar]

Tule aur pathor ek sath felo toh pathor pehle kiyo parta hain?????

[@popatmuhammed3850]

The man the myth the legend 🎉🎉

[@ashortcut2650]

I have a doubt regarding ,how to measure a height of the building and I done experiment but actual height of the building and measured value is not matching -my name is Ansar Pasha from Karnataka

[@ThrillingRide-OP]

Sir I have questions as force is directly proportional acceleration then why doesn't a heavier body fall faster as gravitation force is directly proportional to mass as mass increases force increases as force increases acceleration increases

[@dhruvbaghel466]

Force is not increased by increasing mass.. it actually means that if mass is increased, we will require more fore to accelerate it with same value. Gravitational force by earth on different masses is different but acceleration is same because you divide the force by mass of the body.

[@Naincsingh]

This was also my doubt thank you sir