Thank you for the great body of work you're putting out. It's incredibly helpful.
@GregoryBSadler8 жыл бұрын
You're welcome - glad you're finding the videos useful!
@John-iq2zt7 жыл бұрын
Dr. Sadler, do you think you could do a short video on St. Thomas' understanding of prudence, especially the "integral" and "potential" parts of prudence? I think it would be helpful for many others out there too in understanding this key virtue in ethics. Thanks for considering. I think it is ST II-II Q.48 & 51. If you can't, could you briefly answer these questions: Q1.) When Aristotle and St. Thomas speak about the "common law" under "synesis" regarding prudence, what is this "common law" they are referring to? Are they referring to state law, or any just law established by any kind of community, not necessarily the state? Q2.) And would they both agree that most of the time this should be kept, unless "EXTRAordinary" situations come up? Hence, equity. Q3.) In regards to "shrewdness" in both writers, they say that it is "an easy and rapid conjecture in finding the middle term". Can you please expound on this?
@GregoryBSadler7 жыл бұрын
Here's my video about video requests - kzbin.info/www/bejne/rJy7fKeuocp6d5o As to the rest, you're asking complex questions about Thomistic moral theory, better worked through in a tutorial session. If you're interested in that, here's my site - reasonio.wordpress.com/tutorials/
@Retrogamer718 жыл бұрын
You could say under Aristotle that 'prudence' is the most accomplished of the rational abilities. This is where virtue ethics gets interesting.
@GregoryBSadler8 жыл бұрын
I like that - "This is where virtue ethics gets interesting." And I'd say, you're right
@dixie84188 жыл бұрын
Educative comments by viewers as the same manner of the video. A double thanks.
@axelbatalha2830 Жыл бұрын
In the Nichomachean Ethics, Aristotle defines prudence as a state (εξις) of deliberating well. However, in the De Anima he puts prudence side by side with opinion and epistheme. This leads me into believing that prudence is not a virtue, but one of three types of hypolepsis (suppositions). Confusing, to say the least.
@axelbatalha2830 Жыл бұрын
To make things worse, opinion is said to discriminate (γνωριζει), whereas prudence perceives (κρινειν) without discriminating.
@axelbatalha2830 Жыл бұрын
Maybe prudence is a final stage of the deliberative part, i.e., everything after opinion. Since opinion is not deliberation yet, prudence excludes opinion and is a virtue of the higher deliberative part where deliberation happens de facto.
@GregoryBSadler Жыл бұрын
I think you’re more confusing yourself by expecting that everything fit neatly together rather than trying to think these matters through
@thomasabbott17573 жыл бұрын
Hello Dr. Sadler, Do you have a video explaining the differences between Socrates' idea of the relationship between practical wisdom and the virtues and Aristotle's? I've read and reread Book 6 chapter 13 and I'm still having a difficult time understanding. Thank you
@GregoryBSadler3 жыл бұрын
I do not. That's more of a topic for an individual tutorial session
@thomasabbott17573 жыл бұрын
@@GregoryBSadler Is that something you offer? And if so, how should I go about signing up?
@GregoryBSadler3 жыл бұрын
@@thomasabbott1757 The link is right there in the video description. First openings would be next week
@eogh4 жыл бұрын
Does Aristotle believe that a person really can obtain prudence as you described (in all aspects of life). I’m using your videos as I read the Ethics thank you very much.
@GregoryBSadler4 жыл бұрын
eogh seems so
@MrMarktrumble7 жыл бұрын
Thank you again.
@ShakeAndBakeGuy8 жыл бұрын
You mentioned that these virtues cannot be reduced to a science, but couldn't prudence, in a functional application, be more generallyreduced to practical intelligence as opposed to theoretical intelligence within the psychological context?
@ShakeAndBakeGuy8 жыл бұрын
Great piece once again by the way
@GregoryBSadler8 жыл бұрын
No - not if you're talking about what Aristotle (and other virtue ethicists) mean by prudence. Perhaps if there's some reductive view of "practical intelligence" in A (not THE, since there's quite a few of them out there) psychological theory, you can engage in that sort of reduction - but then you're using "prudence" to name something quite different
@GregoryBSadler8 жыл бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it
@MrMarktrumble6 жыл бұрын
thank you again.
@coleforness35344 жыл бұрын
I think I have seen this dude in a few Tarantino movies.
@GregoryBSadler4 жыл бұрын
When I was a high school kid, people thought I looked like Travolta