The Politics of Judging

[@pdunderhill]

I attended a lecture given by Lord Hailsham many years ago, he presented an almost moribund view of the Judiciary. Mr Grant's presentation is so much more vital. Thank you for your time.

[@markharris1223]

Three splendid lectures. Bravo, Sir. I earnestly hope that if I ever find myself in the dock, I can call upon you to be my advocate.

[@brucevilla]

Thanks for Uploading.

[@kabalofthebloodyspoon]

Don't judge me, Judge Judy :3 wonderful lecture

[@bobdinwiddy]

fidelitas securitas : is the auctioneers' & estate agents' motto : as is the TERTIARY role of architect jegens client and contractor... at auction, one ONLY judges when the product does not meet its description; the rest is between the buyer and seller! we MUST do so, to protect ALL. *caveat* a Queen's Councillor might not be the best political reporter of subtropical colonial historical fact ;)

[@scantconsolation]

The judgment in Leaf v International Galleries actually captures in English law something very like the principle you've outlined. As to your caveat, I'd revise what a Queen's COUNSEL (as opposed to, say, a Privy COUNCILLOR) actually does, and then I hope you'd agree that it has no bearing on their opinion on Britain's colonial history.

[@MidnightRambler]

The judges need to be put back in their box.