Pinned post for Q&A :) (Re-uploaded due to audio/play issues with the first version)
@TheEDFLegacy2 жыл бұрын
Speaking of collaborations, have you heard of Oceanliner Designs? They recently did a video on the SS Malolo; it's a very interesting story on a ship with highly unique safety systems that were well ahead of their time that saved the ship on its maiden voyage. You should give them a look and see if a collaboration is worth it! Anyway, the question: Has any Navy ever build a ship with automated containment systems, such as automatically closing watertight doors (such as the SS Malolo), automatic pumps, etc?
@dixieduffy72 жыл бұрын
Has any battleship/big gun ship experimented with putting HEVT fuzes on their main guns? Seems like they would be devastating against formations.
@MemorialRifleRange2 жыл бұрын
I think for pure tech, Gregs aircraft and autos is the best for specs and aerodynamic info and a worthy reference from a engineer/pilot. Drach I cant tell you how you have changed my entire perspective on ships. Been here since the robo guides. Thank you, I have also been watching Rex, Semper Fi.
@mikemcghin53942 жыл бұрын
Still no sound
@brendonbewersdorf9862 жыл бұрын
I hope you will do more collaborations with Rex I'd love to see a video on German WW2 seaplanes they are an often underestimated and underrated group
@RexsHangar2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for having me on! Was fun to talk about this flying barrel of a plane :D (Hopefully youtube doesn't break this one lol)
@Hiznogood2 жыл бұрын
Ah yes, both my favorite military historical KZbin channels! 😊
@tomg32902 жыл бұрын
Thanks for playing along ...
@zachsmith16762 жыл бұрын
@@Hiznogood i've got 4; Drach, Rex, C&Rsenal, and Mark Novak (the guy behind the Anvil Episodes that were on the C&Rsenal channel)
@robertdendooven72582 жыл бұрын
A correction to your presentation. At the Battle of Midway, all the carrier-based fighters were F4F-4 models. The only F4F-3's were the few in the Marine Corp fighter squadron based on Midway.
@KI4HOK2 жыл бұрын
Probably should add Greg’s airplanes and automobiles.
@tomtann73522 жыл бұрын
I have a friend of 101 years who flew Wildcats and Hellcats. He flew Wildcats at Guadalcanal off the small carriers. He is very sharp and alert and talks about the Wildcat like he just flew it yesterday.
@davidshanahan51342 жыл бұрын
Do a video interview with him while you still can. Irreplaceable memories.
@CL-vw5bb2 жыл бұрын
Please, interview and get as much info from him written down as possible, if it's not a hassle. Very rare opportunity to get the firsthand account of a hero
@larryclemens18502 жыл бұрын
Friends for 101 years - that's an accomplishment in itself! 😜
@demike34832 жыл бұрын
Talk and record, please! Living memory is priceless...
@ME-xh7zp2 жыл бұрын
If you don't feel capable contact the National WW2 Museum, they will find someone who can do the interview.
@MartinCHorowitz2 жыл бұрын
I worked at Grumman when some WW2 era employees were till around. Grumman's design philosophy was always that you were designing a family of aircraft not an individual airplane. This allowed them to iterate changes quicker than some competitors like Brewster. Also as a Former Naval Pilot himself Leroy Grumman placed pilot safety high and sought out feed back from people flying the planes.
@f1b0nacc1sequence72 жыл бұрын
Likely we were neighbors then....my folks lived in Plainview from the 60s on. I drove past the Grumman plant in Bethpage on a regular basis!
@SudrianTales2 жыл бұрын
That's a really good philosophy tbh.
@MartinCHorowitz2 жыл бұрын
@@f1b0nacc1sequence7 I lived in Suffolk County, but worked for Grumman in Bethpage, Great River, and Bohemia, a few times. Last time was on the MQ4C and E2D.
@DavidSiebert2 жыл бұрын
My Grandmother worked at Grumman during WWII. As far as Brewster goes they couldn't build anything well. Between the management and the unions it was a nightmare from top to bottom.
@jollyjohnthepirate31682 жыл бұрын
That's why Grumman was called the Iron Works by naval pilots.
@shannonmonroe5873 Жыл бұрын
In the 90s I met a security guard who at the time was in his 70s working part time at a hospital I was working at. He was a former police officer and before that flew F4F Wildcats, then Hellcats then Corsairs. I talked to him frequently asking a million questions about each aircraft, training and his time in the war. He said he liked the Corsair the best as far as performance. Great guy. Old school no nonsense straight talking guy. A fighter pilot..One day he pulled out pictures of him and his squadron. He said the Hellcat felt like a quantum leap in every aspect. His daughter was involved in aviation but ended up colliding with another aircraft near Chicago and after that I heard he pretty much gave up and passed away 6 months later.
@otadashi15704 ай бұрын
Oh sure. I'd believe a security guard, no problem. One that goes from an officer in the Air Force to hospital security guard. Did he have a bridge to sell you.?
@shannonmonroe58734 ай бұрын
@@otadashi1570 You’re a numnut Lol. He was well known had been a police officer after the war ect. and had been known in the community for years they had pictures of him in the lounge from newspapers dating back to WW2 and after. He was the town hero in Laporte Indiana. What are you like 16 years old? lol🤡
@shannonmonroe58734 ай бұрын
@@otadashi1570 After he retired…Lol. He was a local hero in Laporte Indiana. He lived there his whole life, everyone knew him and they had newspaper articles from the 40s when he served in WW2 and one picture in a Wildcat training at the naval flight training in Michigan. When he was in his 70s they let him serve in security in the hospital. What are you like 16 years old🤡
@simonisenberg45162 жыл бұрын
That "hand to hand" combat of a Wildcat with a bomber must have been the thrill of his life. Just the dogged determination of "I'm going to get you no matter what." or maybe even "Either you or me.".
@adambielen89962 жыл бұрын
Imagine being the guys in the bomber.
@theamericanpotatonamedphil43062 жыл бұрын
@@adambielen8996 when you realize your warrior spirit isn't about to save Japan from these dudes
@jamiecheslo Жыл бұрын
@@theamericanpotatonamedphil4306 Wildcat pilot taking a tantrum after his ammo runs out, "YOU. WILL.GO.DOWN!!!" STOMP! STOMP! STOMP!
@marckyle5895 Жыл бұрын
"I'm not locked in here with you. You're locked in here with me." determination!
@jollyjohnthepirate31682 жыл бұрын
I've always thought that the Lunar Module (built by Grumman) should have been called the Moon Cat.😇
@Ricky403699 ай бұрын
Actually. It was Norhtrop design that Grumman reverted to, after winning the contract with their shitty design.
@ivanthemadvandal84359 ай бұрын
And the USPS delivery cars should be called the Mail Cat
@xwingace12342 жыл бұрын
The Wildcat is definitely my favorite plane of WWII. While not as nimble as the Zero, the ruggedness, weapons, and the pilots who flew them showed it tenacity at a time the Americans (and British to an extent) needed it. I’m a docent at the Kalamazoo Air Zoo in Michigan and we have an FM-2 Wildcat there. What an amazing aircraft. Salute the F4F and P-40 for soldiering from America’s start to its end.
@JeffreyWilliams-dr7qe10 ай бұрын
Lucky to have your favorite confirmed. Now I can get on with things. Greatest relief.
@1977Yakko2 жыл бұрын
Everyone knows and loves planes like the Mustang which did their part to bring Allied victory. That said, I've always had a soft spot for the planes that held the line at the beginning until better platforms could be mass produced. P-40, F4F, the Hurricane, etc. and the pilots who flew during those harrowing early war years are always looked highly upon by me.
@KI4HOK2 жыл бұрын
The mustang was late enough in the war that it only had to fight second line German pilots. The true hero of the American aircraft in Europe was the Thunderbolt. That was there at the start of American involvement and had to face the last of the first line German pilots. It also was much more durable, had better performance at high altitude, and more range than the mustang when the thunderbolt was fitted with drop tanks.
@karlheinzvonkroemann22172 жыл бұрын
That's how we got into two world wars. Arming a belligerent while pretending to be neutral and then delivering war material into and through declared war zones so companies could make money. Without guarantees that FDR would eventually bring the USA into the war the UK would have had to face reality and make peace. The extremely easy peace terms offered in July of 1940 wouldn't even have had been noticed by the UK. The terms did NOT include any surrender of the Royal Navy, any occupation of the UK, no reparations and the offer an alliance with Britain which included German divisions should they be required to defend the Empire. Accepting the German offer was a near thing and was so clearly not designed to destroy the British Empire that it also included a withdrawl of German troops from all of western Europe except for previous German territories retaken during the war (Alsace-Lorraine). All the Germans wanted was a free hand to deal with the Soviet Union which was clearly a growing threat to Europe and the world. This is not the entire German offer which was by all standards a very easy peace offer and kept secret until 2008 when the British people were finally permitted to see it. Instead FDR and Churchill got the world war that they wanted that included the total support of the Soviet Union after Stalin had already murdered 20+ million people by June of 1941. By the end of the war 10's of millions of people died that didn't have to. While this offer to the western Allies was on the table it was still possible to make peace with Germany until after Stalingrad (when they were SURE that they would eventually win the war when FDR and Churchill announced that their terms to end the war had changed to "Unconditional Surrender". This bit of genius also contributed to any negotiated peace being unacceptable and insured that millions more people had to die in Asia and Europe because of those two warmongers before the war could be ended. The same thing was going in WW1 when Churchill was First Lord of the Admiralty and FDR was Assistant Sec of the US Navy. The ship's manifest of the Luisitania was falisfied and presented to Congress during it's investigation of the sinking of the HMS Luisitania. It denied the presense of munitions being carried by the liner which was in fact a badly kept secret, only officially verified when the ship was finally explored in the 1990's and found to be full of munitions of all types, exposing the Allied lies to the contrary.
@penultimateh7662 жыл бұрын
@@karlheinzvonkroemann2217 TLDR Nazi troll.
@garyhooper18202 жыл бұрын
Interesting observation . I shall investigate this further. Always been suspect of why the protracted lull in the war prior to the battle for Britain .
@TheBeef24872 жыл бұрын
Sir, this is a Wendy's.
@williamcostigan912 жыл бұрын
Had to have been a Marine pilot in that Wildcat melee incident. The urge to engage in a boarding action is uncontrollable for a devil dog even if he's in the air.
@DABrock-author2 жыл бұрын
FIX LANDING GEAR! CHARRRRRGE!!
@Zaprozhan2 жыл бұрын
"Fly closer! I want to hit them with my plane!"
@hokutoulrik73452 жыл бұрын
It does fit with the Marine mentality that is for sure.
@scottgiles75462 жыл бұрын
When Drach first posted the story everybody just assumed it HAD to be a Marine pilot rather than Navy and that he had his Ka-Bar in his mouth in case it became a boarding action. Would have been more impressive if it was a Navy pilot. His being from the Yorktown would be belivable.
@colbeausabre88422 жыл бұрын
@@hokutoulrik7345 Marine Mentality - Dumber than a pile of rocks
@agwhitaker2 жыл бұрын
1:05:38 - Fleet Air Arm pilot Capt. Eric 'Wincle' Brown was impressed by the firepower of the Wildcat. He was used to the typical battery of .303" guns of the Fairey Fulmar. He downed a Focke-Wulf FW-200 Condor flying a Martlet (F4F) in a head-on attack and commented on how the nose of the Condor basically disintegrated from the .50 caliber Browning rounds.
@SlavicCelery2 жыл бұрын
People want to crap on the .50 cal Browning MG not being a cannon. Those people have not witnessed the hate/freedom 4-8 of those can throw down range
@starliner24982 жыл бұрын
@@SlavicCelery you are correct, however with the ever increasing closure speeds of the later fighters, one-second burst mass also became an important factor in combat
@SlavicCelery2 жыл бұрын
@@starliner2498 And that's where the increased ROF of the late war M2 for air combat came into play.
@justinebautista13832 жыл бұрын
The late war M2 ironically was still the AN/M2 used on pretty much all american aircraft. The AN/M3 was introduced after the war
@SlavicCelery2 жыл бұрын
@@justinebautista1383 Bingo bango bongo. There you go. Not exactly a slow firing gun by any measurement.
@theamericanpotatonamedphil43062 жыл бұрын
This is the video I've been wanting the wildcat doesn't get enough love
@dannycalley77772 жыл бұрын
TAPNP..................help rehab the O'hare name in Chicago !!!!!
@gusty90532 жыл бұрын
Greg's Airplanes and Automobiles has quite a thorough one and he delves in a lot of technical data from the period. He even points out that most of the heavy fighting up to Midway was done by the Wildcat rather than the more notorious Hellcat (if i am not mixing my warplane videos) :)).
@terminusest59022 жыл бұрын
Great name Potato Phil. Have great interest in the history of potatoes and their great significance for our modern history. Along with the impact of the Columbian age.
@Piper44LMF2 жыл бұрын
@@gusty9053 I like Greg's YT but being a ground pounder my eyes start to glaze over when he gets into a lot of the technical details. But his detail when comparing to other aircraft is very informative.
@gusty90532 жыл бұрын
@@Piper44LMF I admit a lot of the technical stuff runs right over my head also but he does a great job of showing that things were not as cut and dry as we assume. Spitfire beats Bf109 beats P40. Ok... :)) what area, what year, which version, what fuel was available ?. And especially his massive video on the Jug was an eye opener: it had the range, it had the external fuel tanks, it could fight german fighters on an equal footing but when it came to escorting the bombers into Germany the "bomber mafia" chose not to use those capabilities and then lied about it to cover their massive mistake.
@Packer9102 жыл бұрын
A relative that flew F4F’s and F6F’s during the war. He said a very frowned upon work around for the gear lowering issue was to unlock the crank, go into a dive, and then pull out hard. He said the handle would spin like crazy and lock into place really fast. Down side was that there were more than a couple of broken bones that had gotten in the way of the spinning crank.
@khaelamensha36242 жыл бұрын
I do like this pragmatic procedure 😂
@howardlock68872 жыл бұрын
I recall Capt Brown also advocating this in one of his interview s
@khaelamensha36242 жыл бұрын
@Drachinifel0 Congrats Packer, a Drach invitation is one of a kind!! Would not miss it for a fortune 😉
@HalfLifeExpert12 жыл бұрын
I've really become a big fan of the Wildcat. While the Hellcat and the Corsair get the glory from the latter stages of the war, it was the Wildcat that fought the hard and critical battles during the first year. It's also great that Eric Brown gave it his seal of approval. I consider him the greatest pilot of all time.
@kahoki2 жыл бұрын
Eric Brown is certainly someone who would be great to run into at a bar and regale one with tales of all of the planes that he was able to fly and contrast performances of. WW2 Stories From An RAF Ace | Captain Brown kzbin.info/www/bejne/bqSuYaCQo6erb5Y
@jeffhowland8673 ай бұрын
I feel the same. I always liked the hellcats and corsair as a boy, but as I age I really appreciate the wildcat now. It's prewar style is really cool.
@kavemanthewoodbutcher2 жыл бұрын
I will impatiently await for the story of the F4U Corsair. Very interesting aircraft.
@fletch48132 жыл бұрын
For all the respect the Mustang gets, I will take the Corsair every time. The Hog was a beast in 2 wars
@Marin3r1012 жыл бұрын
@@fletch4813 it was the foremost formidable fighter when it came to carrier operations. P-51s were land based. Comparing the 2 does a disservice to the pilots. They filled very different combat roles.
@fletch48132 жыл бұрын
@@Marin3r101 I am well aware of the roles each aircraft played, but given my preference, it would be the Corsair, without devaluing the Mustang's contribution to the war effort. My position is that the Corsair in particular, and much of the PTO in general is significantly overlooked. Too few know of the role the Corsair had.
@kittyo96332 жыл бұрын
Mee too
@B1900pilot2 жыл бұрын
P-51 also flew in the USAF and RoKAF in Korea…
@ludvigthebirb71312 жыл бұрын
Aw yes! Ever since finding Rexs Hangar I always thought you two should collaborate. What I believe most think of as the equivalent channels for naval and aerial history.
@Jimorian2 жыл бұрын
And Rex recently did a video on "Ugliest French Aircraft" that's a great companion piece to Drach's "When Hotels go to War"!
@enjibkk68502 жыл бұрын
@@Jimorian you are all jealous of our natural sense for fashion 😜
@davidcartwright3097 Жыл бұрын
The title on this video is NEXT LEVEL! Great video as always.
@colbeausabre88422 жыл бұрын
What is ignored is that the Fleet Air Arm had Wildcats (then called Martlets on strength in the Autumn of 1940. Eric Brown, then a very junior pilot, was in one of the squadrons to be equipped and recalled the feeling of excited anticipation in the ready room as the Squadron CO picked up the first. He recalled a growing whining sound turning into a scream as the CO dove at their base, with all pilots piling out to see their new mount, abruptly pulled up and roared back into the sky, rolling over and over again. To a man, everyone was elated and eager to get into the cockpit. After working up, they were posted to a field just South of Scapa Flow., where two of their aircraft shot down a German snooper in December, the first kill by American made aircraft in WW2 - a year before Pearl Habor
@spudskie39072 жыл бұрын
One of the most underrated and underappreciated American fighters of WWII. The Wildcats took on the best Japan had to offer and more than held their own during the desperate days of 1942.
@1who4me2 жыл бұрын
Desperate? Hardly. There’s no way we were losing the war
@mrwrightoser82932 жыл бұрын
@@1who4me My Aunt was a US Army Neurosurgical Nurse stationed in Swindon England and her brother my Uncle was a US Army Air Corps Master Sergeant. DON'T KID YOURSELF ABOUT THE US in WWII!!! We were very fortunate to have things turn out well. My aunt told me not to "Buy Into All the Revisionist Trash" being floated around about WWII history. So I asked what she was exactly referring to and she told me she had made it through her time in England and was still young enough and lacking the points to get out sitting on a bench at Ft. Eustis, Va. with new orders to ship out to the Pacific when news of the first Atomic Bomb changed the course of many millions of lives. Within a few days the War was over. Up to that moment either life or death was but a turn of a trifle.
@kidpagronprimsank052 жыл бұрын
@@1who4me tbf, from 7/12/41 to early 1943, that's quite bad time for allied, especially for Pacific. Usually at bottom of supply lists, industrial advantage not fully kicked in yet (that night battle during Guadalcanal basically dealt serve blow if Japan were more smart) and while Japan would inevitably lost, it for certain gonna be longer war
@spudskie39072 жыл бұрын
@@1who4me Yes please tell that to the defenders of Bataan and Corregidor who listened to FDR's fireside chat in February 1942 and realized that no help was coming. One officer wrote in his diary that though "the President means to cheer us up," his talk "tends to weaken morale." "We are not interested in what the production will be in 1943-44 and 1945," he said. Yes Ben, tell them that there was no way the US was going to lose as the "Battling Bastards of Bataan" were short on food, medicine, airplanes, and ever increasingly...hope...and with the ever increasing prospect of death or capture.
@coachcraven82792 жыл бұрын
I love how a true enthusiast/scholar can take a rather simple question like "tell us about the origins" and just go with a fantastic stream of information that would take me weeks to research myself. Thank you for bringing Rex on, I now have another channel to follow.
@stephengardiner98672 жыл бұрын
Always has been a favorite. Short, tubby, anything but cute but tougher than can be imagined. It had respectable performance and when flown by a pilot who knew how to use its strengths (and avoid the fight that the Japanese pilot was trained for) it ruined many a Japanese pilot's day. A version was STILL in use when the war ended. Well done.
@AdmiralWillisLee19422 жыл бұрын
Ayo Rex's first major collab and its with drach, lets go!
@jupitersstone2 жыл бұрын
If your hobby becomes your full time job you are doing very well!
@chuckmarble23652 жыл бұрын
Excellent video Drach -- it's great to watch your video production skills continue to improve. This was also one of the better documentaries I've seen regarding the Grumman F4F Wildcat (and I've seen quite a few over the years). Rex is a great guest: very knowledgeable, articulate and pleasant to listen to (reasonable audio as well). He has instantly become one of my favorite Drachnifel guests! I hope you have him back again soon. Thank you, and keep up the great work ... your videos are very much appreciated (and continue to be one of the things I look forward to the most each week).
@harrykoppers2092 жыл бұрын
Some Wildcat lore - the flaps were vacuum actuated, and there was no max speed for flap deployment, as they would stay up until airspeed dropped, then they'd do their vacuum thing and drop. One trick that was used was, if a Zero was on their tail, to put the flap lever down and pull into a tight turn. As speed bled off, the flaps would go down, causing the turn to suddenly tighten up, hopefully winding up inside the Zero. Maybe.
@paulhelman23762 жыл бұрын
Saw one at Kenosha airport that had recently been fished out of Lake Michigan. It had been flown out of Glenview NAS towards the traing carrier Wolverine and lost . Was to be restored.
@stug412 жыл бұрын
The wing is positioned through the middle of the fuselage not to make room for the gear, but rather to minimize the drag caused by the joining of the wing root to the fuselage. This is the same reason the f4u has the wings on an initial anhedral, to keep the joining directly perpendicular.
@bigblue69172 жыл бұрын
Rex's Hangar and Drachinifel. And it's not yet Christmas.
@joemarshall970811 ай бұрын
A great collaboration by both of you. I enjoyed it and it covered one of my favorite aircraft. Well done and thank you both for the effort. It was a pleasant surprise to hear you mention VMA-121 and Joe Foss. I believe I saw some 121 Wildcat photos early in the video also. A great unit with a great historty and aircraft lineage to this very day. Now, I may show a little favoritism to 121 since I was in the unit during another Ironworks aircraft tenure in the unit. The A-6E Intruder. Humbly
@paulhelman23762 жыл бұрын
My daughter Jen shared her "Sweet Sixteen " party with Leroy Grumman's granddaughter who lived around the corner from us in Evanston. Her dad was David Grumman also an engineer. This represents our only addition to Grumman historiography. Since I am a lifelong free fighter and aviation enthusiast I wish I had gotten to know our around the corner neighbors more closely.
@TomTurner7042 жыл бұрын
I've always been very impressed with the Wildcat’s landing gear. it is a double A-frame like extreme off-road vehicles. You never see off road vehicles with a single strut suspension that is so common on other aircraft. Aircraft can hit the runway really hard, but only on an aircraft carrier, and especially a small escort carrier, does the runway also hit the aircraft as it can move vertically considerable amount. In consideration of strength to weight ratio the Wildcats landing gear layout is excellent. The five high stress points of an aircraft: the wing mounts, the landing gear mounts and the engine mount are all in the same small space, so the frame that must connect those high stress points Is minimal in size. The Wildcat and the BF109 are both well designed in that regard.
@RoyCousins2 жыл бұрын
I'm a fan of Rex's videos, so great to see him on Drac's channel.
@ramal57082 жыл бұрын
F4F has that self sealing fuel tank which is vital in stopping rounds from Japanese planes, although they're not that good in mid war time, they literally held their own against the top, elite and experienced Japanese airmen in the early war. Plus I really like Thach's Weave maneuver
@davidtryon61572 жыл бұрын
Watching this video on the Wildcat reminds me of an interview that the Time Life WW2 book series had on dogfights. From a surviving high scoring Japanese Ace, the interview told of an air battle between one WildCat and multiple Zeros over Guadalcanal. During a patrol, the aforementioned Japanese pilot is astonished to find a single American Wildcat diving, weaving and attacking several Japanese Zeros. The Wildcat does this several times, gaining height and diving for an attack before the aforementioned Japanese Ace tangles with him and eventually wins. Makes me wonder if the American pilot was part of that Flying Circus unit.
@garykeenan85912 жыл бұрын
Two of my very favorite military historians with one click, for almost 2 hours? Brilliant!
@Colt45hatchback2 жыл бұрын
Just need to get gregs airplanes and automobiles into the mix aswell for the perfect trifector 👌
@channelcreatedtoallowmetoc41502 жыл бұрын
Yes. Absolute bliss! 🙂
@brookeonmaui2 жыл бұрын
Made my wife go to sleep…great - all my attention on the terrific film and photos.
@Tim676202 жыл бұрын
That was fantastic Drach. Funnily enough Rex appeared in my sights a while ago because of my aviation interests just like you. Rex, keep doing what you're doing, it's great. I can't remember a channel growing so fast. Nice to see your face. Great explanation of the Wildcat. You kicked into touch a few things I thought about it. Also, you hear about Spitfires, Hurricanes and Swordfish in the UK but the Martlet gets little to no mention. We got them earlier in the war than I expected. Being English I always accepted that the USA had two plus years to practice before being forced into the war by Pearl Harbour. They certainly didn't want to be caught with biplanes by the time war happened. We were just chasing developments from Germany and got the Spitfire just in time.
@jonathanstrong48122 жыл бұрын
there was a small-amount of them which who was aboard the royal-navy's aircraft-carriers which who was apart of the Convoy-Pedestal to-do And the Royal-Navy 's FAA which who had really liked them
@Tim676202 жыл бұрын
@@jonathanstrong4812 Cheers mate. I rather guessed they'd be in the Fleet Air Arm. Great show though.
@awathompson2 жыл бұрын
About F4F combat tactics that is just brushed on, speed. After the capture and testing of the A6M in Alaska they discovered that about 270 Knots (I think) the forced needed to operate the flight stick of an A6M was about the same as trying to bend a steel bar! So keep you speed about 270 knots, and you can outmaneuver an A6M.
@awathompson2 жыл бұрын
I am honored but please select another. Every bookcase I have is full on books on Aviation history, Naval History, or theology. Including two copies of the Boeing 314.
@ulrichkalber90392 жыл бұрын
Mr Brown did not only have the experience to compare a plane with allied models, he also flew all important german models as well, including the Me 163(powered!)
@orwellboy19582 жыл бұрын
Great timing, I've just got back from seeing the USE Gerald R Ford in Southampton water. Great colab. I enjoy both your channels.
@mpetersen62 жыл бұрын
I'm sure that someone else has likely pointed this out but the F4F was one of TWO fighters that served from 41 to 45. There were other types that served through the same period.
@donaldstraitiff78272 жыл бұрын
Lol, Rex points it out in the video
@robertlemaster75252 жыл бұрын
They did specify that the P40 was serving the same time period.
@mpetersen62 жыл бұрын
@@donaldstraitiff7827 The video description says one of only two. But I question that if there were any P-40s still in combat units in 45. I'm thinking they may have still been used in the Aleutians
@BogeyTheBear2 жыл бұрын
The P-38 was in pre-war service and brand-new examples were being delivered straight into the scrap pile in the summer of '45.
@Marin3r1012 жыл бұрын
@@BogeyTheBear P38 was an interceptor though.
@kentbarnes19552 жыл бұрын
My two favorite historiographers (for things that float and things that fly) in the same place! It's a good day all around. I've always felt like Rex was basing a lot of how he did his video on Drac's channel. Thanks guys! Job well done.
@mgreen70632 жыл бұрын
Two bits; I'd read a way of lowering the hand cranked landing gear was to loosen the lock and put the plane in a slight dive. Viola! the gear would go down. Second, attributed to Joe Foss was the phrase 'If it's a Zero and a Wildcat; run. you're outnumbered.' Thanks for a very interesting show and a new channel to watch.
@satweavers12 жыл бұрын
My father trained in the F4F in Pensacola. All he found remarkable about the plane was the hand-crank landing gear. When taking off and trying to crank up, if your hand slipped on the hand crank, the handle would whip around and crack you in the wrist. He LOVED flying the SNJ, and was deployed to the Pacific with VMF-111 anad the F4U. My understanding is that VMF-111 was the first squadron deoplyed to the Pacific with the Corsair.
@adrianrutterford7622 жыл бұрын
Excellent news. A video with two of my favourite creators. Wonderful, thanks guys.
@robertmills86402 жыл бұрын
Thx for fixing audio issues. Very good presentation 😊👍
@sabrekai87062 жыл бұрын
My two favourite channels in a co-op??? Bonus! Well done. I always had a thing for the F4F ever since I was a kid of 8, when my birthday present was a book called "Wings of Fame" detailing some of the aviation greats. Capt. Joe Foss. MoH, great flyer, First Ace of Aces in WWII.
@billballbuster71862 жыл бұрын
Love the Wildcat, a much under-rated aircraft. It became vital to the Fleet Air Arm, a far more effective fighter than Roc, Fulmar and Sea Hurricane. Once tactics had been established it was more than a match for the Zero. I was lucky to see one flying at Chino - Planes of Fame Museum.
@jamesa7022 жыл бұрын
Excellent rendition of this rugged bird. Thanks very much.
@warrenjones7442 жыл бұрын
Outstanding Lads!
@EffequalsMA2 жыл бұрын
Who can't love the Wildcat. It's the American Hurricane. Robust, solid performer, not a leader in anything specific but, the definition of yeoman service. Like the Hurricane, it emerged pre war and served all through the war, despite vastly superior aircraft being available. They also both relied on simple pre war construction techniques that kept them flying when more sophisticated aircraft would be at the repair depot.
@hourlardnsaver3622 жыл бұрын
It’s also adorable.
@nickdanger38022 жыл бұрын
Hurries were made of steel and wood and doped fabric, Wildcats were not.
@EffequalsMA2 жыл бұрын
@@nickdanger3802 Ahh, here comes the rivet counters. I think you're missing my point.
@SuperchargedSupercharged2 жыл бұрын
It is no nice to listen to Rex without an afvert every 3 minutes. Love this video one of the best!
@Marin3r1012 жыл бұрын
Why is it not nice?
@SuperchargedSupercharged2 жыл бұрын
@@Marin3r101 even if the adverts were every 5 minutes that would be a lot better. It is just annoying when it is every 2 and a half or 3 minutes.
@davidmurphy81902 жыл бұрын
@@Marin3r101 Personally it’s probably an error caused by AUTOCORRECT….Which is neither automatic or correct. Just my view.
@ggginforlab2 жыл бұрын
Best naval guy in YT, with best aircraft guy, with best plane of WWII (its easy to be better in 44 vs noobs in old zeros... But F4F won the war in 42)
@mpetersen62 жыл бұрын
I'd say one of the two best aviation guys at least from the history aspect. Greg's Planes and Automobiles goes much deeper into the technical details especially on the engine side.
@wingracer16142 жыл бұрын
@@mpetersen6 Greg's series on the P47 is a real eye opener. Pretty amazing the performance they squeezed out of it to the point where nothing short of jets could hang with it at certain altitudes.
@erichammer27512 жыл бұрын
I'd say the SBD won the Pacific war in '42, but the F4F won Guadalcanal. Sadly, the Wildcats did not make much of a contribution to the survivability of the Dauntlesses, due to numbers and poor communication, but luck was usually with them.
@shadow70379322 жыл бұрын
@@mpetersen6 His P47 vids were so informative. I learned a ton.
@Avalanche0412 жыл бұрын
"best" is a rather subjective word. There were many planes that were better in a purely technical sense. The Hellcat was just an all around improvement with its better range, more powerful engine and hydraulic landing gear. You could argue that the F4F was the most important carrier fighter of WW2 holding the line against the Japanese for the first 2 years of the war and seeing the US through some of its most important battles in the Pacific. Hellcat certainly earned its place in annals of aviation history but the Wildcat will always be the plane that saw us through the darkest days of WW2.
@martinazariancriminaldefen30812 жыл бұрын
An incredible aircraft. It was one of the first WWII planes I read about and built as a model. Just looking at makes me smile. Thank you, Drach!
@sailordude209411 ай бұрын
Thanks for both your military history channels! I watch them a lot!
@964cuplove2 жыл бұрын
YES PLEASE for the 6 hour doctrine video !!! It’s truly great when the videos go deep into details, there is enough short scratch the surface stuff out there, so please please go ahead Tex or the both of you together 😊😊
@baddadjoker9570 Жыл бұрын
My two favorite KZbin channels put together! I’m a pilot and a history nerd. You guys are awesome!
@koric85562 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the quality content guys!
@JTJ19442 жыл бұрын
This and the zero video are masterpieces. Hopefully an F6F and F4U vid in the future
@jimbolxvi64282 жыл бұрын
Loved this one this was another subject my grandpa talked about was Navy Fighters and he always said the Wildcat was the hero of the Pacific it held the line when Japan was an actual threat and as touched on at the end of the video the Wildcat decimated Japan’s experienced pilots so that when the Hellcat snd Corsairs came in to get the “glory” they were doing mop up duty as Japans pilot corps were destroyed and the war was no longer in doubt it was just a matter of how long the Japanese were gonna fight but the final outcome was inevitable.
@erichammer27512 жыл бұрын
The reflective gunsights retrofitted to the early F4Fs had an interesting unintended consequence: because of their positioning on the dash, many, many pilots gashed open their foreheads on the sight by hitting it in rough landings or ditchings. There are even reports of pilots knocking themselves out hitting the things. Ouch.
@erichammer27512 жыл бұрын
The Thach Weave (or "Beam Defense") took advantage of the US Navy's emphasis on deflection shooting, which was almost (but not quite) unique among the world's air forces and particularly suited to the F4F because of its short nose and high pilot position. The attacking element would have full or partial deflection shots on the enemy behind the defending element (which would, of course, be absorbing .303 rounds from the Zero's MGs the whole time). Even a bastardized version of this with three planes (one without a radio) worked very well at Midway.
@Ccccccccccsssssssssss10 ай бұрын
Thank you Drach, I love these interviews! Good job getting such well informed and eloquent guests!
@Onitsutube2 жыл бұрын
I stumbled upon Rex's Hangar a few months ago and after watching a couple of videos, I immediately taught, hm... this guy seems to me like a sky oriented version of Drachinifel :o) nice to see a colab ;o) GJ! guys ;o)
@dennismason37402 жыл бұрын
Great googly-moogly! You know how most people don't look like they sound? Rex looks EXACTLY the way he sounds. So does Drachinifel, by the way. Chances of the two being face to face (sideways) as astronomically weird.
@camrsr54632 жыл бұрын
Hell yeah! My two favorite guys!
@darriusdias5 ай бұрын
This video finally gave me the reasons behind the iterative changes to my Wildcats while playing IL-2 1946 Career Mode.
@TargaWheels2 жыл бұрын
Very interesting and in-depth.
@trekaddict2 жыл бұрын
"Oh, an aircraft thing!" was how it went for me for Rex's Hangar.
@garyhooper18202 жыл бұрын
Not mentioned here is that most Japanese pilots had the HEAVY radios removed , they seldom were of any use , very poor electronics. The U.S. Navy planes radios worked well enough most of the time to enable coordinated operations . A sound advantage lol
@SlavicCelery2 жыл бұрын
All of the radios allied/axis suffered in the Pacific theater. There was a large amount of solar flare/radiation during the primary years of combat. Effectively limiting range and clarity of radio transmissions.
@pedenharley62662 жыл бұрын
Thank you both for this! I love visiting the F4F and SBD aboard CV-10.
@jayyydizzzle2 жыл бұрын
Love Rex's channel
@kevinpurcell209310 ай бұрын
I am building a Grumman F4 F-4 1;48 scale Wildcat. I am going to watch your video.
@JamesThomas-gg6il2 жыл бұрын
I was really hoping you would mention Leyte, because all of those escort carriers in the area threw up every aircraft they had,loaded with whatever they had to create any kind of threat so the carriers could escape, turns out almost all were wildcats. Some brave men attacking the Yamato with empty machine guns.
@hourlardnsaver3622 жыл бұрын
IIRC one pilot even dropped a Coke bottle on Yamato
@kauphaart02 жыл бұрын
And not one of them attacking was British.
@theawickward22552 жыл бұрын
I think one guy strafed the Japanese with his pistol.
@kdrapertrucker Жыл бұрын
Depth charges, if set for shallow detonation could cause some hull damage if dropped just ahead of a surface ship. So the antisub armed wildcats could have done some serious damage.
@zardoz999 Жыл бұрын
Rex has a superb channel: well researched and deftly delivered. Good show, Rex.
@mikehawk_272 жыл бұрын
I was just having trouble loading the original version so thanks for re-upload!
@TheEDFLegacy2 жыл бұрын
Was it the whole video? Or just parts of it? I had no issues on my end.
@mikehawk_272 жыл бұрын
@@TheEDFLegacy I couldn’t load the video at all. I think it was a problem with mobile.
@thatguy34282 жыл бұрын
Very interesting video. Decades ago I had the opportunity of talking to a WWII and Korea fighter pilot who started on the F4F. He told one story of taking off, starting to crank the landing gear, then notice the RPM dropping. The throttle lock had slipped. They were taught to never let go of the control stick so he had to let go of the landing gear crank to grab the control stick so he could relieve the other hand to reset the throttle and lock. When he let go of the landing gear crank it spun around before he could get out of the way and it broke his wrist. Looking back it amazes me there wasn't some form of ratcheting mechanism so raising the gear could be interrupted if needed.
@erichammer27512 жыл бұрын
Honorable mention to the Wildcats of VF-9 which participated in operation TORCH on Ranger and shot down several enemy aircraft. VF-9's first victories were in North Africa. (They're also the first squadron to get the F6F)
@thomasvandevelde81572 жыл бұрын
Oh it's Rex's Hangar with you! Was already wondering who the fine gentleman was. Love his channel too, really good one here, keep up the good work Drach! Regards
@deaks252 жыл бұрын
Is this also Rex's face-reveal vid? Big moments all round. 15:26 "The engine let this promising prototype down" is a line from pretty much every video Rex ever does!
@ivanthemadvandal84352 жыл бұрын
No, his Q@A vids have had his face in them
@mechizawa2 жыл бұрын
Audio works now, thanks Drach!
@tomservo53472 жыл бұрын
I remember reading a book about the Battle of Midway and I wish I could remember the author that didn't mince words by stating that the Grumman Wildcat was proving to be a "turkey" in combat with Japanese fighters. However it's ability to take punishment alleviated some of it's shortcomings. A Japanese Zero pilot's after action report stated that he'd used up all of his ammunition after pumping nearly 500 rounds into a Wildcat but it kept flying and he had to let it go. He knew a Zero would have disintegrated taking abuse like that.
@grizwoldphantasia50052 жыл бұрын
Look at the two First Team books on naval aircraft at war from Pearl Harbor to the end of Guadalcanal. He looks into both Japanese and American reports to document just about every naval fighter action, counting up actual losses documented by both sides, and my memory is that carrier Wildcats and Zeroes were something like 94-93 in kills.
@georgeburns72516 ай бұрын
@@grizwoldphantasia5005just ordered those two books. Thanks
@bobharrison76933 күн бұрын
F4Fs had a positive kill ratio over the Zero at Midway.
@bradleynorton33652 жыл бұрын
Good video. Lots of interesting photos and film footage!
@willlockler94332 жыл бұрын
Loved this. Follow both of you regularly. Please do it again. Corsair would be a good one. American purpose designed carrier plane which was difficult to land, on a carrier! Brits figured it out and taught the Yanks. Went on to serve well beyond WW2. I'm in Houston and hope to get down to Galveston next weekend to check out the progress on BB35. Cheers!
@nickdanger38022 жыл бұрын
The USN had the Hellcat for carrier ops and the Navy and Marine Corps operated Corsairs from land where they could be loaded to the max with bombs for ground support. The RN used Corsairs on carriers because it did not have anything better. According to wiki the first RN Corsair pilots trained in the US.
@willlockler94332 жыл бұрын
@@nickdanger3802 All true. Let me get my references in a row and I'll get back to you regarding what I was referring to.
@smittywjmj2 жыл бұрын
When the XF4U-1 was originally built, its canopy was much further forward, with the fuselage fuel tank behind the pilot. For weight balance, the cockpit was moved back with the fuel tank in front, which meant it was basically impossible to see the deck when landing. Corsairs were making carrier trials as they officially entered service in the last month of 1942, a solid six months before the Hellcat entered service. Obviously it could be operated from carriers, but not easily, and it was considered too dangerous, particularly under the manpower and training requirements of USN aviators in late 1942. Vought took a number of steps to improve its carrier handling, but the Hellcat was still easier to land with good-enough performance for the Navy, and remained the premier carrier fighter. British Corsair pilots trained with the Americans, who were obviously most familiar with the plane, that's nothing new. What they had done was adapt their typically shorter final approaches and sharper turn onto the fantail to the Corsair, improving visibility and only losing sight of the deck at the last minute. This was about mid-1944, and after finding success with this method, they quickly contacted the US, who adopted the same pattern and finally started to put Corsairs on carriers.
@svgproductions722 жыл бұрын
So happy you guys went over this! A feature length conversation about my favorite plane? Glad the F4F Wildcat is getting so much exposure on your channel
@nitehawk862 жыл бұрын
Good timing, in the middle of the 18 hour Shattered Sword audiobook about Midway and just reached the part about the Thatch Wave. Hopefully in another hour of audiobook we will advance 10 minutes to the SBD Dauntless dive bombing run. Highly recommended if you like long audiobooks. :)
@christianullrich29232 жыл бұрын
"Please rest assured, however, that the bombing will commence presently thereafter."
@johnbrinsden875110 ай бұрын
Thanks!
@craigfazekas39232 жыл бұрын
@6:44 ? One of the types employed by the USN in airship service- being launched & received in the dirigable's hangars. Astounding in many ways, those 1930s..... 🚬😎
@Riccardo_Silva2 жыл бұрын
Great Vid! Drach on the naval side and Rex on the aerial side. Fantastic! and, in the middle, the legendary Wildcat! Too interesting and illuminating! Great Vid!!!!!!"!
@halkyuusen86262 жыл бұрын
It's the first time I've heard of an aircraft using its landing gear to "land" a different aircraft.
@carsons57502 жыл бұрын
So glad you guys made this video, Rex’s channel is amazing and I don’t k ow if I would’ve found it otherwise.
@Dafmeister19782 жыл бұрын
"Ask and ye shall receive, within reason" may be the most British thing I've heard this week.
@tartan_ninja692 жыл бұрын
Two of my Fav Video producers
@bloodworthmagic2 жыл бұрын
Excellent! Loved it. I learned a lot.
@jessemijnders2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the quick reupload
@USS-SNAKE-ISLAND2 жыл бұрын
I flew the Wildcat in multiple missions over Vietnam, 68 thru 69, going head-to-head with the... Wait a second. I think I need to lie down for a while. (Great video, btw.)
@kennethdeanmiller73242 жыл бұрын
Yeah, you can tell when someone really loves & has a passion for what they are doing. Coming to Drach's "neighborhood" & "rattling on for 2 hours" definitely shows a vast amount of knowledge about the Wildcat. And cc CD E passion to simply put up 2 hours of info as if he were simply talking to one of his buddies for a few mins. I've never been to Rex's Hangar but I will definitely have to give it a visit soon.
@Dave5843-d9m2 жыл бұрын
Germany had problems creating self sealing fuel tanks. When they did, there was about a year where engines were blowing up for no known reason. It was eventually discovered the self sealing liners were depleting the fuel octane value leading to engine knock and holed pistons.
@bamagrad992 жыл бұрын
I've always loved the Wildcat. This is the fighter that held the line in the first year of the Pacific war when Japan still had her best trained and most experienced pilots.
@DavidBrown-yd9le2 жыл бұрын
I never knew of the float version. Than you! Well done!
@williammorris5842 жыл бұрын
My late uncle flew the FM2, and demonstrated a few times that no late war Allied fighter could turn with a Super Wildcat.
@kdrapertrucker Жыл бұрын
The F4F was only replaced right after the war by the F8F Bearcat, a worthy successor that never really got to show what it could do.