【國際前線 209 🇺🇸】龔小夏博士：特朗普被政治迫害，為何令人特別憤慨？

[@yk3813]

Thank you!

[@willialuke]

整件案件並非指控特郎普擁有機密文件，而是他一而再，再而三，三番四次墟報事實， 企圖瞞騙政府， 抵触間諜罪的礙司法公正，最後在寓所被搜出秘密文件，可謂人贓並獲。政治迫害是特郎普的說詞，將刑事法案轉為政治議题， 蒙混過去。

[@nancywong8302]

點解又告佢唔入呢？！ 咪政治迫害咯！

[@willialuke]

@@nancywong8302 你懂不懂法律程序咖，現在他只是被起訴，將會進入聆訊，比機會他作辨，由陪審團作出決定是否罪成，再由法官判刑。呢啲都係民主國家的基本法律程序。不要將美國政治和法律等同強國，反政府就係正義，自我對号入坐，不分清红做白，你話特郎普受政治迫害，你究竟有冇做搜查，明白事情前因後理，你又對特郎普的為人有幾多認識呢？小心網红發放的信息，要分析過濾。 你的邏輯扭曲，起訴不等於入罪，要經陪審團决定，不入罪可以是證據不足，屬於刑事法案，與政治迫害無関，特郎普就係想混淆呢两個概念。

[@lesliechow299]

沈生成日強調修補撕裂，但美國正面對是非黑白對錯邊緣，最需要修補既，其實係當初立國精神同原則

[@cathyc147]

少有見龔博士咁激動，但很同感。若Biden 連任，以後四年一定開始拉共和黨人坐牢，消滅政敵永績執政。唔好以為只是trump 受災，唇齒相依，共和黨人沒選擇。

[@joyfulwing]

YT / Google 多次刪去我為龔博士解釋其咁激動嘅原因。但一提某些字眼就我的文杂全刪

[@livefreefromfear]

感謝🙏🏻分享❤️❤️

[@nakita8854]

謝謝訪問不同看法的人。

[@kkboy28]

今次樓下討論都好激烈😂見到沈教授都好盡力持平👍希望再開專題深研及梳理一下背後Full Picture, 比觀眾先有更多客觀認知再作是非討論, 有時引得起最多反對既點亦可能就係踏進最根本核心問題既線索, 不要被反對既意見或風向帶著走或有所顧忌, 支持支持!!

[@nvb21]

感謝龔博士的分享，看來這事情真的有理說不清，使我覺得獨立的司法非常重要，希望這是民主自由的最後防線。

[@rayymlai]

While most of us are "passionate" about the topic, there is a clear mix of misinformation, partial facts, and strong sentiment in the interview. Both speakers are well respected. I'd suspect if some of us dive into the actual evidence from the indictment, and fact-check, particularly from Trump's own words under oath and his attorney's notes, we may render a different perspective. The truth is likely to be somewhere between two extremes.

[@TZeroZeroOne]

What "two extremes" are you talking about? I can see 龔 representing one, but who/what is the other "extreme" ? Does truth always lie somewhere between two polar opposites? (Think flat earth vs round earth.)

[@jonathanlau7681]

Very objective observation!👍👍💪💪

[@dleung8938]

Could you please tell us what misinformation was delivered in the interview? I think your narration is kind of disinformation. I agree there are polarized views. Better figure out the cause. A corrupt Biden's family with strong evidence of accepting bribery is at large. Judicial actions against Trump go on and go on, with an intent to cleanse him away from the political arena. What is the true intent behind? For the national interests? It is what a facist government tends to do for political persecution against opponents.

[@macaufan]

反共华人也很支持trump 但沒有站美國本地人角度及缺乏了解

[@junkyt6109]

​​​@@TZeroZeroOneExactly!! She is entitled to her opinions, not to her own facts. However, she was proven to be a blind cult follower of Trump and his total made-up spur of the moment words. Fox was fined US$787 millions. She should be fined too. Just like T, she is an enemy of true democracy.

[@jonathanlau7681]

美國係三權分立的 除非你不支持法律下人人平等 但不要每一様有關特朗普被法院裁定有罪 你就改變話題去攻擊拜登去分散注意力

[@maylui5474]

美國有難，全世界都有 難😢

[@weggie3388]

似手龔小姐也用臭蟲理論去跟Trump開脱指控😂😂

[@dyuen9780]

Thx

[@pikchunchan8970]

三千幾萬份？八千幾萬份？數字從何而來？數過了？

[@sisterkwok6527]

其實，誰做都不太重要， 最重要，可以有三權分立去互相制衡彼此，否則，又多1個希特拉出現！😢

[@dleung8938]

出現左喇，成個拜政府搞紧呢样嘢。

[@SunnieWoo]

@@dleung8938 係你哋人格謀殺將拜登整個政府機關污名化，真係要不得！呢D咪就係特朗普輸打贏要嘅手法囉😏

[@dleung8938]

@@SunnieWoo 對於完全唔知美國聯邦政府在拜登治下，及拜登本人及其家庭有幾腐敗嘅人，講多句都嫌晒氣。我唔會人格謀殺任何人，祇係說真話而矣。講真，而家唔係拜登被人逼害，雖然佢及其家人仍然未罪有應得而逍遙法外。但人在做天在看，盼君一天深悔撐錯魔鬼拜錯神，認賊作父。

[@michael77555]

點贊問好留足印，添點人氣祝好運❤

[@takyinauyeung7159]

龔博士好理直氣壯講出特朗普係政治迫害因她感受到公平公義法治嘅存在好重要

[@jas7181]

睇呢個訪問就知點解沈教授咁吃得開，無論對方講啲咩有幾混帳都好，都係用學者精神去觀察同理解，多謝沈教授

[@Helgagaist]

應該係混亂 唔係混帳咁跨張😂

[@georgeyeung8374]

“混賬” 這個名辭用得正好； 特朗普無論說的, 做的通通都是混賬。無論從事實, 邏輯, 常理, 人倫, 道德, 愛國心,,,,, 等等來看，他不是一個正常人！

[@Avacado721]

請沈教授慎請嘉賓，misinformation 在美國好 rampant，國會裡外都有人睜大眼老吹，善動人入國會大樓打打殺殺都話冇嘢；卸任後拎幾百盒機密文件番自己間富人俱樂部儲存响廁所比FBI肏到都話有咩唔妥，龔博士呢啲盲鐵侵講乜佢都會照跟，小心影響你自己個台聲譽

[@kevinlaw6250]

值得深思🤔

[@cheungkk7700]

感謝兩位

[@mayfan9570]

❤👍🏼

[@garrychung6858]

聽完呢集，更加知道呢個世界真係有幾混帳😥

[@pikchunchan8970]

這一面之詞，如何能令你（知道）只能是澈頭澈尾的誤導！

[@ant1536]

@@pikchunchan8970 多看美國國會直播, 多留心, 多看Biden, 和Trump的演講, 不要道聽途說, 再加一個清晰的頭腦和眼睛, 不難判斷.

[@ChuiwingAu]

👍👍👍

[@williamwilliams4275]

謝謝龔博士，講得非常清楚，有理有據，同尋日那位，高下立見!

[@kimre342]

多謝沈大師請龔博士嚟，佢係少數講廣東話又熟大陸嘅學者，希望將來多啲聽佢嘅評論。

[@charlespork23]

係呀, 佢仲鬧埋Pompeo, 擺出一個完美無暇, 已經唔再用大腦諗嘢嘅堅侵粉。

[@dleung8938]

​@@charlespork23 你好似話緊你自己不單不用大腦，連自已個腦都廢嘅。

[@dleung8938]

​@@aereustea7820 反映哂你有無公平嘅信念，你绝對是無。

[@SunnieWoo]

@@aereustea7820只覺得佢係強詞奪理，左閃右避！

[@kaisinchan]

@@aereustea7820 你要@佢個名，佢先至會見到

[@bensonchung2165]

👍👍👍

[@winnieho5277]

Trump got what he deserves.

[@503cmha2]

感謝龔博士給大家講解！沈教授這個節目做得好，先後讓大家聼不同嘉賓，不同立場的解釋。

[@maomaoyu9933]

多謝2位。不同意見聲音好重要，美國亡係左膠同民主黨手上係可能發生嘅將來

[@TangoPo]

龔博士今日好肉緊

[@SunnieWoo]

國家有任務交咗俾佢，寧做多勿做少！

[@SunnieWoo]

@Stella_Yuxyz 每個?? 是你？是龔小夏？代表每個美國人？！ 如同習近平騎刧十四億人！ 如同鄧炳強騎刧全香港人！

[@44664]

​@@SunnieWoo人地話每個(愛國的美國人） 唔係話你 咪咁睇得起自己

[@xd137xyz3]

最需要修補既，其實係當初立國精神同原則

[@laijingchao]

龔小夏聲譽學養，一舖清袋。觀點可以不同，但必須有實據支持，連這個起碼要求都不符合，怎去說服別人？

[@dleung8938]

喂，拜登处理密檔，既無身份，放响車房，周圍放，希拉利索性將為數不知幾多嘅机密電郵，全部銷毀，連相關手機都毁认埋，又唔郁佢。

[@redrooster5096]

@@dleung8938 Trump 講過 lock her up, 如果有證有據證明佢犯法,早就塔咗佢啦！

[@pakliu4155]

Beware of misleading fake news.

[@sallywong935]

先看美國之音記者的訪問，再看這個完全不同角度的訪問，大家自有判斷😅

[@yanl3777]

非常感謝沈旭暉博士🙏訪問龔小霞博士👍 她非常愛國(美國)💯💪 事不離實 特朗普的支持率無人能及！這就是民意💪

[@sevenuno]

唔只美國，呢度啲留言都好兩極化

[@kaisinchan]

呢度留言兩極化總好過兩三年前咁幾乎一面倒，其實係件好事嚟

[@gyhk2000]

唔係攞錯 係被指時仍然不合作

[@dleung8938]

乜嘢叫老砌。

[@HKBBNAofArt]

Admittedly I only listened to the first few minutes and couldn't continue listening. If the fact that those top secret doc were highly sensitive as the prosecutor alleged, the fact that it's an oversight of the accused only goes to matters of mitigation.

[@user-hs5cm1jj5l]

How do you know those documents are highly sensitive? they are not supposed to disclose the public nor reporters for now. thats the augment i see so far ppl loves to manipulate attacking the guest if they are righteous. pathetic

[@HKBBNAofArt]

​@@user-hs5cm1jj5l just like any criminal matters, the prosecutor will allege, facts will be provided to the accused and the defence (lawyers) will negate and the court will decide.

[@brucel7430]

@@user-hs5cm1jj5l Accord to the court document, some of the documents founded are marked as "TS/SCI", i.e Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information, which is one of the highest levels of security clearance, what can be more highly sensitive than that?

[@user-hs5cm1jj5l]

@@brucel7430 “Just because something is classified - even Top Secret, SCI, NOFORN, FISA, pick your alphabet soup - does not mean it is National Defense Information within the meaning of the Espionage Act. NDI, for the purposes of an Espionage Act prosecution, is defined as one of a long list of items “relating to the national defense which information the possessor had reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation.””” It is tough to say because we cannot see the documents”” Anyone who has worked around government knows that overclassification is a huge problem. A ton of documents end up being classified because of arcane technical rules that may not reflect the real world. If the president were to ask the Navy what’s for lunch for the next week at Coronado, for example, there is a good chance the answer comes back with a classification marker on it.”. find the article yourself ‘6 Reasons DOJ’s ‘Get Trump’ Documents Case Is Seriously Flawed” if you want argue with the legal insider in the US, not me. Hate all you want.

[@brucel7430]

@@user-hs5cm1jj5l "How do you know those documents are highly sensitive?" This was the question you asked, and this is the question I answered. No one outside of the court knows what's inside those documents exactly, so one could argue either way, but arguing over something we don't know is meaningless. However, those classification were made under the Trump administration, it's clear that they thought , at the time, those information were important enough. As for if those documents contain NDI, I think the experts in DOJ/DOD would be more qualified to judge than someone, such as Will Scharf, who doesn't even know what's inside those document. The article is nothing more than opinion based on assumption of unknown information, not facts.

[@vh7227]

多謝龔博士分享

[@waikwantse5709]

謝謝龔博士非常公平分析很清晰那種事件擺明不公平是迫害

[@vivredanslaverite8799]

又係呢位親俄學者龔教授

[@kwongdebbie1505]

Sasha博士，晚上好。

[@nine7295]

Always a long time supporter, always gave like, until this episode. I am unsubscribing. Sorry, Dr. Sum , thanks for all your other excellent videos.

[@carson3448]

democrat allow different voice?😂

[@nine7295]

@@carson3448 sorry I don't belong to any American political parties. And I don't understand what you are talking about. Are we not free to subscribe or unsubscribe? Free to comment? Have I offended you or anyone?

[@ant1536]

為什麼這節目那麼匆忙? WHY? ? 有後續嗎?

[@ericso9843]

支持小夏姐的立場－保衞自由民主！

[@cybercatcat]

啡伯心血之作, 看完令人反思！唱衰容易唱好難！ 香港以往的美好故事, 大家心照！😂🤔😘

[@myapplechannel2622]

一直支持，不過今次覺得有點過咗頭！I live in US, and regularly follow news. I think Trump is raco

[@Avacado721]

Raco咩意思

[@wahgoh18]

政治就是如此天呀烏鴉一樣黑

[@GatorWinup]

Dr of what?

[@charlespork23]

In Bullshiting? She probably gets her doctoral degree from Trump University.

[@carson3448]

Philosophy Havard

[@GatorWinup]

@@carson3448 Great, thanks. No wonder, not a Juris Doctor, no law degrees. She did not, at the very least, cite any inaccuracies in the indictment. She failed to discuss the any legal or factual issues. All she said was regurgitation from Trump's own propaganda. I could not sense any independent or critical thinking in her words. Philosophy, isn't that the subject that has no bounds? How far is that from Theology? Sure, next time, invite someone that uses belief to win an argument. I wonder how many people would hire a priest to represent them in a trial. (oh, you mentioned Harvard too, why does that even matter? Your tendency to subject to authority?)

[@brucel7430]

@@GatorWinup Actually, according to wiki, she have a Ph.d in sociology from Havard. Her thesis was about cultural revolution, so the main focus of her Ph.D study was about China. If she talks about China, I may listen. but if she is talking about US issue, I would take it with a huge grain of salt, too much partisan talking points.

[@carson3448]

@@GatorWinup thanks for followup/correction fm @brucel7430. there's no English page for her and I prob made some mistake. its a good question hence I did some check up to fulfil my personal interest. she also got PhD History fm Beijing uni and I think we shouldn't expect too much on both of them.. its more for countries of the uni, not to mention wiki is more for convenience... my 2cp sharing.

[@heidileung3750]

龔博士的分析很清晰，加油，⛽️ 多謝🙏

[@klchen9482]

講霸道？邊個夠希拉利，加埋個支持黑命貴的奧巴馬，兩個都同侵侵有私怨

[@charlespork23]

如果係執嘢執錯咗, 咁政府問你要番啲文件, 咪交返比政府囉。而家個問題係, 就算我當你有心又好無意又好, 政府問你要番文件, 你點解唔交? 仲要收收埋埋擺哂入廁所? 咁呢一個 "唔覺意攞錯" 嘅辯解就根本唔成立。

[@dleung8938]

原來你又係俾左媒誤導。

[@charlespork23]

@@dleung8938 可否解釋怎樣誤導呢? 那麼多的文件在廁所, 有相為證, 是放置機密文件應該的地方嗎? 而難道特朗普有馬上送回所有文件嗎? 還是你相信特朗普所說, 作為總統, 只需要在自己腦裡說這些機密文件已經declassified, 就真係神奇地declassify了?

[@kaisinchan]

​@Stella Yu 佢哋係FBI一request 就即刻交哂啦，宜家特朗普係冇即刻交哂不特止，仲要講大話，法庭出傳票又唔理，所以先至令FBI要出動搜查令，搞到自己咁樣衰囉

[@dleung8938]

@@kaisinchan 個件嘢唔知就唔好乱噏，中晒左媒毒。Obama要慢慢將文件scan 完自己存檔，存檔呀。

[@dleung8938]

@@charlespork23 吖，你連亞侵個腦諗乜都老作，唔怪得知你對事實探究會落得如此地步。

[@yukchau6643]

感謝龔博士❤

[@JW0312]

👍🏻

[@tekman7649]

真喺要好有耐性先聽完老粉紅發言😂 Trump嘅專制從前顧員們口中都可窺探一二，不管Trump粉嘅支持原因為何，但咁樣支持一個冇底線同獨段獨行嘅人做總統，同支持習某人終身連任嘅小粉紅有何分別呢? 就算有幾唔認同democrat嘅政策都好，我寧願選一個republican or democrat 中正正常常嘅候選人都唔會選trump, 唔通佢果4年都重未睇透佢係咩料咩

[@JC-oo1im]

So true!

[@flyingzone356]

說得好

[@SunnieWoo]

老、小粉紅都係唔需要理據咁去愛國，可憐🥺 但我相信清楚嘅人仍佔大多數所以特朗普上屆落選，其實落選好平常但最肉酸係輸打贏要，落選後做埋啲小動作自毁長城。

[@kaisinchan]

啱呀，其實好多人說穿了不過係小粉黃、小粉熱同小粉綠，同小粉紅嘅分別除咗係政見唔同之外，其他位根本就冇分別，即使我自己係黃嘅都咁話

[@kaisinchan]

​@@SunnieWoo 美國國內係清楚嘅人佔大多數，但喺華人社會就擺明唔係，基本上當時美國權威全球民意調查機構嘅民調顯示，大陸、台灣同香港支持特朗普嘅人係多過反對佢嘅人

[@SunnieWoo]

咁激動十足十戰狼上身😳語無論次過咗火啦🙄

[@chinkang3566]

原來係粉紅

[@SunnieWoo]

@Stella_Yuxyz激動愛國係激進派、共產主義者，一般美國人愛國都唔會戰狼上身！

[@jamiezhang9666]

正所谓“爱之深，恨之切”，龚博士作为美国人，看见极左的民主党将美国操弄得如此堕落不堪，完全理解明白龚博士略为激动的情绪。

[@70-860]

With guest like this, are you planning to turn your channel into Fox or one america? I can respect different views but I will not tolerate any misinformation. There's not a thread of truth from her.

[@Avacado721]

可能有人想行 Tucker Carlson 條發財路

[@70-860]

@@Avacado721 最 最討厭口講要民主自由 但自2016 年 一班yt 同網民 一直支持一個有美國史以來最獨裁 自以為是既總統。

[@kaisinchan]

​@@70-860 啱呀，華文KOL持續5、6年一講起美國，就有95%嘅留言都係支持特朗普，係宜家好少少，得80-90%留言係咁。所以我覺得華人社會除咗台灣之外都冇民主唔係冇原因，因為大部分人嘅民主素養同民主商數低落，冇民主心態，明明就係輸打贏要嘅民粹撚，根本就未ready for 民主

[@sangtsang7936]

這是極左與極右之爭，當然只有民主自由的國度才會發生。

[@dleung8938]

如何極右，亞侵係法西斯？

[@jamestay6840]

Seriously!! Doctorate. Again the same hypocrisy, “In the name of democracy……”

[@mingtsang3594]

Totala false ACCUSATIO N FROM AN EDUCATED TRUMPTARD

[@nelsonccwoo]

OMG!

[@hawkins55]

The country is so divided. People are taking in only the info that they want to see that they agree with. Some people see Trump a saint and savior of the countr and he can't do anything wrong. They excused any infraction that he has done. Others see him as evil and everything he does is wrong. They see that everything he says or does has evil motive. Thing is I don't think there is one person in the world that falls into either category.

[@dleung8938]

It is the political situation pushing us to take side. Neutral? A myth unlesw you are extremely apolitcal.

[@j.d.salinger2317]

But Trump is really the worst, just listen to the way he speaks at the rally. Nothing but lies....

[@BloomRec]

No one is above the law. Our law applies to everyone. Please, give me a break. She is totally biased and even spreading misinformation. Letting her talk is ok but Simon, please do your fact check for your audiences sake , please..

[@user-hs5cm1jj5l]

she is the most unbiased one with explanation while you creepy folk never listen

[@NAMVANC]

Yes, agree, Simon. I respect you and your program, but please dont let your guests spread misinformation without fact-checking. Oponion is one thing, misinformation is another.

[@user-hs5cm1jj5l]

@@NAMVANC she might be wrong over the numbers but NOT THE ACT. those she named in the video DID the similar thing as Trump but was NEVER EVEN questioned. this is where the argument starts whether or not this is political prosecution. I shouldnt waste time over you or others but i keep seeing arrogant main mainstream supporters under the comment section as if they are justice.

[@brucel7430]

@@user-hs5cm1jj5l She was wrong about the facts too, or maybe she believes in alternative facts. The BS about Obama and Bush, NARA put out a press release just to clarify it, she was pushing fake news. If both NARA and the person who had the document were not aware of the missing document, then no one should be blamed for. If NARA knows and asks to get it back, the person should do so. If the person finds the document, he/she should return. That's quite simple. "NEVER EVEN questioned"? Pence found document, and willingly returned them, FBI looked into it, and case closed. Biden found some documents, and willingly return them, he even asked the FBI to search his home, so he has been cooperating, and there is a special counsel appointed to look into his case. It's still an ongoing case. Both were being questioned.

[@willialuke]

相信沈教授是明白事理之人，但可惜訪問一個是非不分的人士意見，又不fact check她的事理，只顧抱持學者中立身份，讓她在平台發方虛言誤導大眾。令人可惜。

[@winnieho5277]

Trump has legal suppport from his very expensive legal team.

[@brucel7430]

龔小夏就無疑係侵粉, 連講大話都一樣. 唔少錯誤陳述 1. DC是否過度加密, 根本與本案無關, 因為決定機密級數係當時侵政府. 而侵被告罪名, 特別係間諜法, 根本唔要求係機密文件. 2. 印象中拜登無千幾箱文件, 根據多次新聞報導, 可能有百幾份, 但具體數目未清楚, 特別調查官Robert Hur亦未有公佈. 3. Obama根本無攞3千幾萬份文件, Bush亦無攞8千幾萬份文件, 呢個係fake news, 國家檔案局已經澄清咗. 4. 無錯, 歷任前總統都可能無意執錯野. 但根據起訴書, 侵係刻意隱瞞, 法庭出傳訊後依然刻意不交還, 咁就唔係一句執錯,執漏可以解決. 而有份指出刻意隱瞞既證人之一, 就係佢既私人律師. 5. 之前歷任總統, 有邊一個係國家檔案局要求交還後, 都係刻意唔交還? 有邊個係法庭傳訊要求交還後, 重係刻意隱瞞唔交還? 用侵既行為同其他前總統去比較已經係false equivalence.

[@fgsentg]

你错了，龚小夏以前是支持民主党，甚至2016初选都无投给阿侵，她着重的是美国利益，不是党派利益，现在的美国是什么鬼，民主党的议题除了堕胎就是变性，最起码阿侵那四年大家都是正常点！ 1. 檢查官聽司法部，司法部聽總統拜登，你真以為現在美國还司法獨立，同一天拜登被國會踢爆收了烏克蘭1000萬元，馬上就起诉阿侵，還什麼間諜法，真是笑死，通俄门呢？為什麼主流媒體沒人說，因為當時他們都说有證據實際現在證明是一個騙局！ 2. 就拜登持有機密文件時是參议員和副總統，足以比阿侵嚴重几倍，因為當時他無解密权，只有總統才有這個權力！ 3. 阿侵一直有和檔案馆溝通，甚至抄家前檔案館人員來檢查時還叫他們上鎖保管好！拜登是事后主动上交，如果不是有人捅了出来沒人知他有机密文件，真是喊贼捉贼！做人不能太双标！阿侵的庄園有特勤人員24小時看护，拜登的文件甚至放在車庫! 4. 奧巴馬的確持有大量機密文件，甚至檔案馆為了他在附近建立機密所安置，甚至奧黑2年多才交齐。還有其他總統，引天朝官場一句話，但凡去查的沒一個不會沒問題 5. 最后，还有人看所谓的主流媒体，比如CNN等，这帮媒体已经没信用可度，你看下美国民意就知。现在是自媒体的天下，这帮犹如民主党官媒的是时候扔进垃圾堆！

[@brucel7430]

@@fgsentg 佢以前是否支持民主黨, 無可考證. 但佢一早就係共和黨員, 09年就已經代表共和黨參選議員. 1. 你有證據拜登向司法部或特別調查官施壓? 更唔好講, 建議起訴既係FL既大陪審團, 定係你認為拜登可以影響到大陪審團既決定或timetable? 至於話拜登收咗錢, 等有事實證據先講啦. 2.拜登案情是否嚴重目前並唔清楚, 既唔知文件係咩性質, 亦唔知特別調查官是否相信當中係有意圖. 刑事實最緊要係要控方可以證實到intention. 3.你明顯無睇起訴書, 起訴書指出, 佢連自己律師都隱瞞, 而唔交出全部文件. 如果佢唔係前總統, 政府一早就告, 唔會慢慢傾, 連法庭傳訴都唔全部交還, 要搞到出搜查令, 根本就唔衰攞嚟衰. 4.你呢個根本就係大話. 呢個係NARA press relase 原文. "When President Obama left office in 2017, NARA took physical and legal custody of the records of his administration in accordance with the Presidential Records Act. NARA made arrangements to move the roughly 30 million pages of paper Presidential records of the Obama administration to a federally acquired, modified, and secured temporary facility that NARA leased in Hoffman Estates, IL, which meets NARA’s requirements for records storage and security. NARA moved the records to Hoffman Estates because of the intention of President Obama to build a Presidential Library in the Chicago area." 咩兩年, 根本就係講大話. 5. 人地睇咩媒體又如何? 起訴書係法庭文件, 根本就唔使睇媒體.

[@boblam9757]

你真利害，無所不知。

[@NAMVANC]

Great analysis!

[@dobeikwan3684]

'Obama/Bush/Clinton等等都拎咗機密文件', 都係侵侵(或佢嘅粉)老作出嚟嘅whataboutism, 如上講檔案局已經澄清咗(當然, 啲人是否相信呢個澄清又係另一回事,而美國(/西方)人民對主流媒體同機構嘅信任度大大降低, 呢個又係極權國家樂見) 同埋呢條片個標題係一條(heavily) loaded question, 好有問題

[@janiceliew2224]

✊❤永遠支持侵侵

[@503cmha2]

我不擅長英文，沒在美國生活過，也沒有和不同階層的美國人溝通過（就是知道條鉄）。看了一些不同立場的表述，特朗普最主要面臨的問題是撒謊、煽動民粹、可能涉嫌違反憲法（這些都是從特朗普言論裏面找到的證據，但又很難作爲法庭證據），至於機密文件問題只是小問題（卻可以作爲法庭證據)....其實特朗普明顯不如約翰遜有風度，人家約翰遜知道有很多人反對他就自動請辭了，免得引起紛爭。

[@janiceliew2224]

@@503cmha2 我有獨立思想、不看表面。你有你的自由...

[@kennethfung1207]

反對特朗普嗰班人，係因為特朗普阻住佢哋搵食

[@SunnieWoo]

@@janiceliew2224人會變月會圓never say never 否則就係盲撐😂

[@janiceliew2224]

@@SunnieWoo Only for another 4years of Presidency. I meant forever HE is the best President😇

[@yipyip2020yip]

其實有一疑問，為什麼這麼多屆的美國總統發生同類事件，而到今天都沒有人提出避免有離職總統會帶走國家絕密資料而且會危害國家安全的妥善處理？

[@dleung8938]

答案是美國联邦政府根本就唔當是甚麼一回事，足以証明乜嘢為政治逼害。

[@dgntitgt8114]

Agreed with Dr. Kung. What I know is : Not everyone is able to discern what has been going on without the knowledge/experience of the past in order to have critical thinking. And I understand is : those who grew up watching TV and getting everything from smart phone are programmed to what to think, they don't know how to think. Hope for light & bright so we all see clearly in common ground! Blessings of love & Peace to everyone!

[@willialuke]

You are trying to divert the facts with a generic saying. I am in doubt your ability to discern between fact and opinion.

[@dgntitgt8114]

@@willialuke Not sure how to differntiate the fact from opinion any more. What I understand about 'Fact" , from the past decades, is based on imagery and how many people keep talk about it. When in doubt, seek within, it helps think clearly. Always, blessings of love & peace to all!

[@leo317hk]

佢好亂"一陣又好撕裂,一陣又唔關事"好似共慘黨:"責任不在我方"永遠都係別人錯..

[@SunnieWoo]

同袁大砲一伙嘅係咁上下質素😂

[@kaisinchan]

​@@SunnieWoo 根本就係同一伙嚟

[@SunnieWoo]

@Stella_Yuxyz 關你叉事😂

[@Avacado721]

美國總統犯法應該有特權唔應該拉， 收埋幾百盒 classified docs喺俱樂部間廁所，唔算叛國罪，應該特赦

[@minusone787]

強弩之末trumptrump 兩邊冇人幫 被犧牲了

[@wahsung]

好似香港啲藍絲既思維

[@macaufan]

美國中共化有過之而無不及

[@B人子]

龔氏講嘢好正 正常人到咗八十歲都開始痴呆

[@DP-8964]

Very disappointing

[@kennytse8056]

She has her own selfish agenda to blindly protect her political party. Absolutely rubbish!!

[@mhkhung]

Not even her own party, it is no one in the same party other than trump.

[@hcwong7967]

龔小夏的言論不盡不實，甚至虛假！

[@44664]

​@Stella_Yuxyz 原來呢度咁多白痴盲毛demorat

[@holiday258]

什麼也都是政治迫害😂

[@albert6439]

當年競選總，民主黨聯同主流媒體，搞小動作，不公道的打壓侵侵（大概幕後推手係希拉莉，輸咗條氣唔順），就做成整個社會的分裂，這是做孽，整個社會都要付出代價😫

[@williamwilliams4275]

DS 班魔鬼，同匪共勾肩搭背!

[@SunnieWoo]

🤭😂🤣

[@ray412m]

唔好成日諗咁多神化嘢啦，就係一個官局纏身嘅二世祖靠選總統頂住官司，完。

[@fungkuenlee5140]

美國政治左膠的窮兇極惡真是可媲美共產黨的卑鄙邪惡。 謝謝二位博士。

[@kenlin8737]

真的好九怕聽呢個女人講嘢，連前國務鄉蓬佩奥表達的立場都無端受到呢個女人的攻擊，呢個女人才是真正的共產黨以後如果呢個女人再在沈教授的節目裡出現本人堅決抵制！

[@SunnieWoo]

x 2 唔聽佢發噏風真係冇損失、戥沈教授辛苦😅

[@yclam945]

其實聽哂兩邊意見先會可以理解件事到底係點啵😹

[@nine7295]

@@yclam945 其實基督教會都應該請撒旦魔鬼嚟講佢嘅立場同埋意見咁先至啱噃，但係你諗有冇人會咁做？

[@yclam945]

@@nine7295 事實係你無見過撒旦嘅不堪，係無辦法真正咁堅定基督信仰啵。唯有理解基督同敵基督嘅分別，我地先可以真正行基督嘅道。 另一方面，如果你想向相關嘅人傳教，你一樣要理解人地係有咩諗法先。

[@yclam945]

@Stella_Yuxyz 你要試下從佢地嘅諗法去睇佢地睇到嘅嘢，先會理解到佢地點解會信你覺得好奇怪嘅想法。 btw，其實話人自以為是呢件事本身就已經好自以為是。🙈

[@pikchunchan8970]

沈博士你干嘛淌這極右老妖撒的一泡混水？

[@Avacado721]

大家唔需要擔心，法官人選已經安插好侵委任的Aileen Cannon

[@stevenwu2325]

龔小夏胡說八道

[@TZeroZeroOne]

特朗普之被控，會何一定要用政治鬥爭的角度來談論，為何不能按已知事實論特朗普的行為是否適當？沈台主請來龔小夏之流，顯然著意前者，令人失望。

[@Avacado721]

極爲失望！ 成個 channel 即刻拉到去袁巴巴嗰啲 level，其他香港人KOL唔咁行咁埋

[@annieleung3279]

What a waste of your air time

[@SunnieWoo]

@@catpundit5036兩條友一擔擔

[@jeremyyau7905]

等候分析拜登個人收取五百萬及其家族收外國資金嘅調查報告

[@smwdotcom]

Thank you both ❤

[@jingruiliu1782]

怎么没普通话呢？有字幕吗？

[@lukepau8093]

日后可否多請博士上节目

[@SunnieWoo]

咁趕客🙀

[@mhkhung]

頂唔順呢個浸粉。乜都唔關佢是喎。

[@georgelau2187]

🤣🤡

[@Apple-xy1mx]

😂😂倆位新鮮組合❤

[@miuyingyu2493]

令人看不到美國有什麼希望，特朗普有時令人生厭，但是受到如此逼害。民主黨手段卑劣低級。東升西降就係因為咁。

[@SunnieWoo]

我唔知係唔係迫害，只知特朗普輸打贏要個人品德都唔好得去邊。

[@SunnieWoo]

大陸人對「東升西降」最新解説是「潤」，飛機從東方升起降落西方國家。 美國有沒有希望就請留意在美中国人，尤其是習近平在美的家人有沒有西升東降這個行動！

[@mingtsang3594]

The worst speaker

[@SunnieWoo]

仲有一個姓袁、一個姓錢😠 呢三條友真係聽到我想打爆個mon 🤯但唔聽又唔知世上竟然有咁賴皮嘅人😖

[@eldonchoy1889]

告間諜罪都痴撚線，唔通Trump會通敵咩，通俄羅斯中國定北韓丫，都on9。完全係政治打壓

[@charlespork23]

可以係沙地阿拉伯, 而家佢哋係咁fing錢, Trump家族收了唔少。將自己國家機密情報和別國分享, 就係犯間諜罪。

[@nine7295]

你唔識美國法律，就唔係講幾個粗口字可以補得到嘅。

[@eldonchoy1889]

@@charlespork23 你條傻仔有無睇過控告書丫?就係無寫Trump究竟通緊邊個敵丫，告間諜罪連通邊敵都up唔出丫，仲告，成班低能仔

[@eldonchoy1889]

@@nine7295 你又識條鐵? 個個前總統and現任總統都keep左機密文件，但淨係告丫Trump，搞場大龍鳳告d無謂野。而家D人就係嬲法律被權貴利用丫，明5明丫傻佬！好似香港個國安法都係法律黎架，唔代表合理架，懵丙

[@kaisinchan]

俄羅斯嘅話都唔出奇呀，特朗普咁親俄，普京制裁蓬佩奧都唔制裁佢喎

[@Bomlana]

龔博士今次輸咗比沈博士，過份激動，太急燥。沈博士用平和的語氣把龔博士比下去。龔博士只要心平氣和地說出，紐約告Trump性侵那單官司，沒有時間，地點，人證，單憑一個愛做性幻想的作家的單方便控詞，就算在紐約的深藍州的陪審員都一致裁定罪名不成立，沒有性侵這回事，但告Trump對該女子誹謗罪成。Trump 不認罪。我想問吓各位，既然所謂的性侵根本不存在，那麼何來誹謗？第二單告Trump取走國家機密文件，問題在於總統有權解密任何文件，如何解密？原來很簡單，就是在取走文件的那一刻，由監督人員把文件放入一個紙箱內，然後由專人提着紙箱步行出白宮就已經解密咗，然後通知國家檔案局文件放在那裏庫存就已經完成。所以Trump根本不存在沒有解密的文件，任何文件，不管涉及那個層面，只要是當時的總統，就有權去解密，任何人及部門不得異議，這個是總統特權。所以今次的訴訟根本不存在，是政治迫害，人身攻擊。比較拜登做副總統及彭斯做副總統完全無權解密任何文件的權力，而把文件帶出白宮，不論多少份，重要不重要，都是犯法，但到目前為止沒有受到任何司法控告，這樣就顯得司法已經被武器化，為當權者所用，攻擊對立方。大家看看今天的香港，有良知的人都會明白。

[@mokox752]

Great comments!!!

[@brucel7430]

錯, 任何機密文件解密都必然有個程序, 唔係搬入個箱就得. 而且, 根據起訴書, 入面包括有核武資料. 根據原子能法, 但何關於核機密, 總統都無權獨自解密. 而起訴書亦有引用證供, 指出侵明知佢有既機密檔案無解密. 最後, 無論文件是否有解密, 都唔會改變呢D係政府文件既性質. 政府文件係唔會變咗做私人文件. 政府文件即使已經解密, 原檔都必需要上交檔案局, 等外界可以引用FOIA去向檔案局申請一份copy, 以保障公眾既知情權. 最重要既係, 起訴佢既間諜法, 根本唔要求該文件是否機密. 只要係國防相關既政府文件, 就可以告, 唔信你可以去睇起訴書已用引法律條文.

[@kaisinchan]

其實總統要解密文件係要填張order form畀國家檔案局ga,先至唔係你講得咁簡單囉，問題係張order form由FBI入海湖山莊到宜家都冇見過喎

[@Bomlana]

以下引用曾是香港的新聞工作者，現居住在美國的［Nikki Miu 國際新聞台］的一編報導： 美國總統有《總統檔案法》上的權利，此法允許總統決定在他離任前自行決定那些檔案需要歸還，那些他想保存，而國家檔案管理局無權過問。 總統的職位處於對文件物品分類層次結構的最頂端，由於Trump是離任前已決定解密或分類那些檔案，所以並不存在「不適用」於機密文件中。根據《總統檔案法》以及司法觀察訴國家檔案局一案例的判決，總統只需要把他想保留的文件分離即可，簡單而言，是總統選擇離任時帶走的任何東西，就已經自動變成不是機密，而條件只是把檔案放在盒子裡就已經合法帶出白宮。此外，任何人都無權審查或辯論總統的決定。歷任總統都是這樣操作。 保守派非牟利法律組織司法觀察曾就前總統克林頓帶走任內的錄音帶而控告國家檔案管理局，最終法官援引《總統檔案法》，裁定克林頓有權帶走那些錄音帶，幾日前，在［華爾街日報］撰寫評論的Michael Bekesha正是該案件的原告，是司法觀察的一員。所以許多美國法律界人士都認為今次起訴Trump跟上次克林頓的案件一樣，從一開始就不成案。 “Mr. Clinton took the tapes, and no one could do anything about it” “That was the position of the Justice Department in 2010 and the ruling by Judge Jackson in 2012”

[@chanlocke1831]

1.一場訪問中不存在勝負，主持人立場是中立的，但當受訪者言論立場過於偏頗，主持人就會引反方意見帶動話題，任敬揚訪問中，沈博士亦有問共和黨立場的問題 2.沒有性侵不等於沒有誹謗，性侵是告Trump的行為，沒有足夠證據所以不成立，但誹謗是告Trump的言論，Trump好像公開指稱對方是性工作者什麼的，具體說了什麼不記得了，總之最後是誹謗罪成 3.當核武資料被Trump帶回家中，已經超越一切我對機密文件的認知，核武資料肯定是最最高機密，放進個紙箱帶走就等於已解密？我不行，我的常識告訴我這不可能，再說Trump帶核武資料回家想幹什麼，能有合理解釋嗎？可能最終Trump會無罪也不一定，法律也常常讓我感到驚訝，但是要對Trump展開調查，理據是足夠了，並不構成司法武器化和選擇性執法，而大陪審團亦決定起訴Trump

[@mhkhung]

佢同袁爸爸真是一對侵膠。