The various choices and the consequences of those choices from missions 14, 15, and 16 of the Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War Campaign. 0:00 - Identity Crisis 1:26 - Good Ending 7:05 - Bad Ending 15:12 - Alternate Bad Ending
Пікірлер: 311
@dontpeek77913 жыл бұрын
10:13 that "sorry adler, i've got a job to do" hit as hard as a punch straight to the face
@jaredzeno472 Жыл бұрын
That has to be the Canon line in the "bad ending ". It just fits and makes so much sense
@CODFan-fz7xb Жыл бұрын
“You sure?” I like
@dercarrot9913 жыл бұрын
I love how when you lie to Adler, his name turns red, your now in enemy territory
@chasesstuff60102 жыл бұрын
No, when a character’s name is red that means they are your enemy. If it’s blue they are your ally/not worth it to kill
@TGDyro2 жыл бұрын
@@chasesstuff6010 that's exactly what he said
@chasesstuff60102 жыл бұрын
@@TGDyro no
@TGDyro2 жыл бұрын
@@chasesstuff6010 dawg 💀💀💀
@jaya9922 жыл бұрын
@@chasesstuff6010 stupid
@moosejuice21663 жыл бұрын
Honestly feel like the bad ending makes more sense, an experiences kgb agent just ups and betrays his old friends after he finds out that his "new friends" just brainwashed and used him like a tool, just feel like bells less forgiving then that
@odsttrooper37243 жыл бұрын
Perhaps, but by doing that, he kills millions of people. It depends on the player for that decision.
@Cydoniaaa3 жыл бұрын
Adler: Bell came through for us in the nick of time I never doubted it Bell: I’m bouta ruin this whole mans career
@jacobwithak69153 жыл бұрын
11:11 I know this is to make the player feel bad but the rag doll tho when mason is shot and sprung into the air
@imAngzy3 жыл бұрын
i died laughing when i saw that
@r.mictal2 жыл бұрын
The screaming in the background did not even help Edit: Add kzbin.info/www/bejne/gaq4kqpvnZ2jZpo for dramatic effect
@ItsStevieBoy3 жыл бұрын
11:06 mason: goddamn it bell, your going to die here! Bell: No u.
@pongsonsirirat17173 жыл бұрын
Canonically, the truth ending happened obviously. As for Adler and Bell’s fate, I believe they both died since they were never mentioned in bo2 (or maybe because this was unplanned lol). As for the lie ending, I don’t think Bell was “betraying” them. He just “returned”to his “former self”, serving the Motherland once more.
@souravdg3 жыл бұрын
I will say yeah they didn't mentioned him because it was not planned..But there is another point is that bocw is part of the new timeline..So bo2 will still be part of the old timeline..In this new timeline,I don't think so events of bo2 ever happened.
@yakro34493 жыл бұрын
Adler & Bell dont die, you cant die from one bullet , and looking at the scene from slowmode they dont shot each other in the head, my guess is that they both will be wounded and the rest of the squad will find them
@pongsonsirirat17173 жыл бұрын
@@yakro3449 if that’s the case, I still think the chances of either of them surviving are very slim. Adler was standing on the edge of a cliff so he would definitely fall off and die if he got shot. As for Bell, due to the location, he would either die from having nowhere to patch up or got finished off from the rest of the crew once they’ve found him.
@globama84333 жыл бұрын
The campaign takes place in 81, and the multiplayer takes place in 84 and Adler is in the multiplayer, that means the canon ending (truth) Bell dies and Adler survived, people say Bell is Stone but the theory of Bell being Stone doesn’t have much evidence supporting it bes ides them having similar uniforms. It’s possible that Adler retired. Adler would be 49 in the time of bo2, but also I have heard theories of bo2 not being canon.
@reichtanglevictor16943 жыл бұрын
@@yakro3449 yes, you can. I'm sorry but you're just desperately grasping for a way for them to survive, which simply doesn't happen
@saviorwow97243 жыл бұрын
The "Bad" Ending is actually a "Good" ending because Perseus will not kill you as Adler does.
@Ixe7Ixe73 жыл бұрын
You seem selfish
@_I02_3 жыл бұрын
@@Ixe7Ixe7 to be fair though, our character was kinda the antagonist the whole time so it honestly made sense.
@cockatyusha23593 жыл бұрын
And the soviet union wins ⚒️
@faqeur21613 жыл бұрын
No I like when Adler and bell dies
@nickcoy21033 жыл бұрын
No the bad ending is bad, Adler had to kill Bell since he knew too much about the CIA and America, the CIA couldn't take the risk of letting him live since he could provide Intel to Perseus if he goes back to him. The good ending is still good since Bell is technically the antagonist(anti-hero). So it is understandable that Adler killed Bell.
@Flitchyyy3 жыл бұрын
bad ending is good ending because you did it for the mother land
@shat69113 жыл бұрын
Yes, comrade
@yakro34493 жыл бұрын
ye and i guess 14yo people cant understand how deep this goes , and how cannon is the fact that Adler kills you in the end
@hetzerrush54913 жыл бұрын
you are right comrade
@ItsStevieBoy3 жыл бұрын
Da, tovarishch.
@sv0k9373 жыл бұрын
guys i said funny russian joke please laugh now
@ZekeSpeakz3 жыл бұрын
This is a good example of moral dilemmas. You either blow up all of Europe or prevent it happening but at the cost of your own life. Of course I chose the Solovetsky ending because I’m I didn’t think I was going to die.
@noncontrollable Жыл бұрын
I still think it's a good ending because u play as a ex soviet spy :D whatever :D
@Walther19383 жыл бұрын
Every story seems to have a happy ending. I think alternate endings are the good endings cuz they’re never expected and to me, they’re underrated. 😊👍🏻
@ClonedGamer0013 жыл бұрын
I’m not sure I’d call the ending where the entirety of Western Europe becomes a nuclear wasteland a ‘good’ ending.
@null80362 жыл бұрын
@@ClonedGamer001 it is all matter of perspective, give some long time that wasteland gonna be another land and there are always more land than europe and also tbh we play as bell and this ending give him best outcome. it's not if the west win the world there are suddenly no bad thing happened anymore.
@domasbaliulis23 Жыл бұрын
@@ClonedGamer001 and the rest of eastern europe under the boots of the mr. big that is perseus, person who thinks he can play god with the rest of the human race.
@MajorReckerFailure3 жыл бұрын
The "Good" ending is the cannon one I guess?
@olivia37793 жыл бұрын
Since they are connecting the modern warfare and black ops universes probably
@strikerecho25923 жыл бұрын
Yes
@webbs3713 жыл бұрын
Yeah cuz I don't think mason and woods can just magically be alive again
@philipgodsworth47643 жыл бұрын
@@webbs371 also I’m pretty sure Europe exists in MW2019 and the Black Ops sequels lol
@strikerecho25923 жыл бұрын
@@philipgodsworth4764 It does
@Trapp_3 жыл бұрын
I like how it's a good ending is where you are betrayed by your allies and killed while bad ending let you get revenge on people who tortured you for weeks, wiped your memory and abused trust.
@stormtrooper98943 жыл бұрын
I only want to kill park and alder they were the only bad guys for me
@Broken_Savior2 жыл бұрын
But Europe isn't turned into a parking lot. Also, keep in mind that Perseus tried to kill Bell first. And would have succeeded if not for Adler's intervention.
@Fallenburg2 жыл бұрын
@@Broken_Savior That was not the Perseus who tried to kill Bell. Arash tried to eliminate him because he didn't want to compete with bell in the Perseus team. I don't like how people try to make the True Best ending look bad.
@TheTrollMastah3 жыл бұрын
So do Bell and Adler kill each other? Like do they both die? I picked the “bad” ending I lied because they brainwashed me lol but killing Park was sad I liked her booty
@djplayz-3 жыл бұрын
Ayo bro
@ALPHARIUS_2573 жыл бұрын
Bruh
@locust25VI3 жыл бұрын
lmfao
@gotem1233 жыл бұрын
He has his priorities straight
@HenryManning943 жыл бұрын
"I see you are man of culture as well"
@comicaleclipse50893 жыл бұрын
When it gave me the option to betray them I lied without hesitation and was so excited that I got to be the "bad guy" for once. Bad ending honestly makes more sense for bell but if it was made canon it retcons bo2. I was kinda hoping the bad ending lead to the zombies campaign or atleast contributes to it in some way.
@sammymamudi29883 жыл бұрын
This would've been cool if paint it black was playing when they were walking on the ship
@howaboutno223 жыл бұрын
Or sympathy for the devil but you preach truth bredda
@wynq21193 жыл бұрын
You could have killed adler immediately and not went to pick up his lighter on the bad ending for another short cutscene.
@LTBLACKCOAT3 жыл бұрын
I feel an important detail in the right/wrong debate here that I don't see really discussed yet is that, there are American Bombs, purposely upgraded and placed in allied and neutral cities some of which dont even make tactical sense like say London or Paris or for some reason what looks like Västerås. My take, Operation Greenlight by this universes America was designed to not only cripple the advancing USSR forces in eastern Europe but as a "Gun to the head" for any nation deciding to defect once the war became hot. That does not even touch on the issue these are indiscriminate weapons of mass destruction set in civilian targets.
@knightsotl7963 жыл бұрын
You might have a point here
@null80362 жыл бұрын
you have a point but they won't care since 'muh murica good murica won't do bad'
@Broken_Savior2 жыл бұрын
Nukes have saved more lives than they've ever taken. Quit your sobbing, hippie. Although, I will readily admit that it is somewhat shady that those Nukes are in place. I don't think America asked for permission. But then again, First Place doesn't need permission from anybody. Still, it would have been courteous.
@aplatypus76513 жыл бұрын
The "bad" ending was actually go because they brainwashed bell,yhe real "bad" in the ending was killing mason and woods
@kultysta82483 жыл бұрын
10:21 Bell is made of pure stalinium
@LeRealModeusFan3 жыл бұрын
Reason why we have to kill Adler Because there mission you saw on computer is "DONTTRUSTADLER".
@Glacial82843 жыл бұрын
I like the "bad ending" more
@jaredcicero47853 жыл бұрын
So now is BO2 - BO4 still considered canon or not since this game is a direct sequel to BO1, but it's a soft reboot of the series; does that mean anything after this game didn't happen now ( BO2 - BO4 ). Also there's one huge thing that links this game series into the Modern warfare series now with Zakahev being introduced in this game as he's mentioned numerous times in the modern warfare reboot. It'd be interesting as hell if they manage to successfully link both series together
@Delta-es1lg3 жыл бұрын
@@Danny_Spades Part of Black Ops 2 involves Woods and Mason in the cold war, so assuming that this game invalidates those stories, all of Black Ops 2 is also invalidated. Which sucks, because Black Ops 2 was really good.
@Delta-es1lg3 жыл бұрын
I think that what's happening here is: The Black Ops sequels and the original Modern Warfare series is non-canon to this new universe which picks up after Black Ops 1 and World at War. The new Modern Warfare and Black Ops Cold War are both in the same universe, which is some new thing separate from those two older universes
@synthvvavve1913 жыл бұрын
Does anyone have a dialog for the bad ending where you choose to let both Park and Lazar die in Cuba? Best ending imo, it was nice to be Rouge for a change
@Ghanem-023 жыл бұрын
When i knew that i was controlled by Adler and CIA i choose bad ending and boom all of them headshots asap. I knew the good ending will end up by me getting killed after i was used by them.
@taskfroce80th952 жыл бұрын
The first 3 gunshot you hear when you betray Adler is not a audio bug, it killed the solider on the right hand side of the screen
@pootispencer97653 жыл бұрын
I think exploring the alternate history of the bad ending is way better (in terms of story) than the future of the good ending.
@Outlaw_Actual11b3 жыл бұрын
Anyone else see 11:14 mason just FLIES AWAY
@geekhammergamer14383 жыл бұрын
11:11 bye bye rocket man
@todoplays62053 жыл бұрын
We don't know who shot who because Bell & Adler both pulled their pistols at the same time then gun shot flash sound came to a close
@gavins.92543 жыл бұрын
During the bad ending, does anyone else have a glitch with the AI where the bullet goes through their head but doesn't kill them?
@washer16403 жыл бұрын
Nope. I finished it yesterday morning and everything was perfectly fine.
@grenadiermike3943 жыл бұрын
I think its because of their Helmets ig?
@alextemourian90103 жыл бұрын
I love how the name turns red if they are against you
@ClonedGamer0013 жыл бұрын
I still can't tell who dies in the 'Good' ending. Adler or Bell? Or both?
@ghostlyowl23023 жыл бұрын
I think Bell just does, because Alder is Alive in the multiplayer, which is considered canon
@bulletsandmilk19853 жыл бұрын
@Roniixx Yes it does.
@yakro34493 жыл бұрын
My guess is that no one dies, looking at the slowmode where they are aiming at each other, it ain't the head, they both might be wounded from that and still alive after the squad find them (thats a guess)
@globama84333 жыл бұрын
If it doesn’t tie in to the storyline there is no reason for woods, park and Adler to be in the multiplayer
@globama84333 жыл бұрын
The only way we’re going to assume who lives is by looking at the multiplayer, Adler is alive and well in 84 and we see no trace of Bell, which could possibly mean Bell dies. It is possible that the multiplayer isn’t canon but I’m assuming it is because again, there should be no reason to put campaign characters into multiplayer unless it’s tied into the story. Change my mind
@axey.79263 жыл бұрын
The Alternate Bad Ending is actually the canon one. Perseus is still alive, and so is Adler and the Gang.
@ghichihoussem50173 жыл бұрын
THE bad ending is the best "Perseus"😎
@yony77053 жыл бұрын
Is there a difference if you do the side missions or not?
@globama84333 жыл бұрын
There will be different dialogue from my guess, but nothing serious. But i don’t know I did both the side missions
@kevinsteelflex73713 жыл бұрын
What if you miss the countdown in the good ending?
@NM-ej3xw3 жыл бұрын
you fail the mission and start from the last checkpoint
@JuicethaJEDI Жыл бұрын
Idk if you notice, but if you look at 11:12, a body gets sent flying
@joshuacrooks75713 жыл бұрын
I don't understand why Adler ices Bell. Loose end, maybe?
@production603 жыл бұрын
He was an asset. He served his importance, so they needed to get rid of him
@drewrice54753 жыл бұрын
I would assume that they also feared that it’s possible that he could go rogue and expose them for the Mk-Ultra program.
@gagongartist57683 жыл бұрын
damn, so bad ending erases all of black ops
@ZFanz3 жыл бұрын
Even modern warfare franchise
@yakro34493 жыл бұрын
except it ain't cannon
@BossMr513 жыл бұрын
Can we just talk about how the good ending. Even though you didnt betray them when quite frankly. You have every right to, being quitr frank. (They mind fucked you to hell and back and was just like "lol) and they just shoot you. But in the "bad" even though you've presumably done everything else accordingly and good. They welcome you back with open arms and shit Like??????
@the_officials383 жыл бұрын
13:39 that high pitch reallly bugs me
@unknownwill4th5492 жыл бұрын
Who woulda thought me just playing the cold war campaign because xbox buys activision and me being bored gets me fucking invested into the cod franchise.
@hetzerrush54913 жыл бұрын
but i love the bad ending because he did it for his motherland.
@br15313 жыл бұрын
I liked the bad ending but I felt bad about killing them especially lazar, when you save him he thinks of you as an actual friend, but for when I saved park my next play through I shot her as much as I could, I do feel bad about killing mason and woods though
@bunnybelllove55653 жыл бұрын
Finally the only one who sees things like me! I’m lazar simp and I think woods and mason are the homies
@choronox41943 жыл бұрын
If you didn’t have to kill mason and woods I would be fine with that ending
@Glocky673 жыл бұрын
why everybody chose lie aka bad ending
@luizsena78603 жыл бұрын
wait, wich one is the TRUE ending?
@sigalag6163 жыл бұрын
There is no true ending you choose your ending
@CharlesUK3 жыл бұрын
We have to wait until the next black ops to determine. It would be pretty obvious if one of these endings are canon
@whyareyoureadingthis53083 жыл бұрын
The good ending. Mason and Woods cant die in the game, because they reappear in BO2, which is set in 1986 and one mission in 1989.
@luizsena78603 жыл бұрын
@@whyareyoureadingthis5308 yeah, maybe
@SW-82283 жыл бұрын
Why are you reading this the ending where mason, woods and Adler dies is probably another timeline that will be maybe expanded after this is finished and Activision needs more money out of the Black Ops Series. The one where bell tells the truth is the real ending as Adler is alive for the multiplayer and bell isn’t. And also well BO2 ever heard of it? Lmao
@ThePLAYUZ3 жыл бұрын
I hope when Adler tries to kill bell after the heroes mission bell survives and seen in the next installment
@gamessiosm61093 жыл бұрын
Kinda wish bell had a face
@christian_lied3 жыл бұрын
Nooo, the bad ending made me sad
@Yozie_3 жыл бұрын
Good ending for me, bad ending for bell
@MrVibes_3 жыл бұрын
I feel like the TRUE ending of this is when Russia blows up on Europe because First when you choose and ending it goes like this ending 1: side with Adler you get black ops 2 and just a regular black ops series and it continues. Ending 2: side with the Russia you get modern warfare reboot That’s why wood Junior says “I will finish what he started” and Bolkov from the mission has the gas from black ops Cold War or he developed it idk can’t remember but anyways that’s my theory, Cold War is a way to bring the new mw reboot into the black ops series telling us what ending we want...not only that Imrin Zakhavea (don’t know his name spelt) got sniped by price in 89 or in the 90s
@nacho29203 жыл бұрын
It’s not. The game is a prequel to BO2, where Mason and Woods show up alive and (mostly) well. If it were the true ending, we wouldn’t be able to play in the UK in mw or Berlin.
@MrVibes_3 жыл бұрын
@@nacho2920 it’s a nuclear bomb that only kills people not destroy buildings
@orfeastsakos30253 жыл бұрын
Its not russia that blew them up, it was * technically* perseus as it wasnt a soviet plan
@MrVibes_3 жыл бұрын
@@orfeastsakos3025 you know what I meant
@MrVibes_3 жыл бұрын
@Roniixx still doesn’t make sense how the mason and woods would be alive in 2019-2020 in modern warfare reboot
@ONE_Gom3 жыл бұрын
11:15 WTF was that
@toideuthichvnpt8 ай бұрын
i think bad ending could be bad but better than betrayed by alder?
@adamburetta5473 жыл бұрын
You might want to teach the guy with the rpg how to aim he could and killed you and to me killing Adler is the good ending
@legendaryrookie89023 жыл бұрын
I still don't understand good ending
@fusionnstuff34653 жыл бұрын
You stopped the nukes, everyone is happy, Perseus is angry, Adler kills you. It’s just how the CIA operates
@v12ts.gaming3 жыл бұрын
@@fusionnstuff3465 and the 1985 timeline of BO2 can begin
@patriciacox96032 жыл бұрын
6:46 Who Died?
@thelonecuber10953 жыл бұрын
This will be cool
@vog-3 жыл бұрын
So do bell and Adler shoot each other? Who dies
@Skedadledoodle3 жыл бұрын
I think it’s left to imagination, I believe since we don’t see Adler in any other games and this is the technical “true ending” I believe Bell took the first shot, killing him then going into hiding.
@user-jw8yh6yq1p3 жыл бұрын
@@Skedadledoodle I'd like to think they both shot each other at the same time and died.
@GeForceMan3 жыл бұрын
I think more of the story will be unfold in the upcoming Warzone update. We now know that the BO Cold War and MW 2019 games are tied to the same universe. It‘s definitely gonna be interesting.
@ridholautse44313 жыл бұрын
I never see either Guns firing soo maybe?
@pheonixnova43833 жыл бұрын
Bell died, because multiplayer takes place after the campaign and Adler is a playable character
@Zaviyarakbarn Жыл бұрын
HOW IS THAT THE GOOD ENDING? edit:nvm
@williamfrenxh88313 жыл бұрын
I think the bad ending was the good ending
@chrisn69873 жыл бұрын
I serve the Soviet Union
@AverageXennpai3 жыл бұрын
Yeah I would never in my mind wanting to kill my man Woods and Mason, and Lazar seems like very good man too. So Fuck the bad ending
@johnjake12733 жыл бұрын
And we are gonna get it out of you
@silkut_online_20373 жыл бұрын
My first playthrough I accidentally nuked all of europe because of one little cookie.
@Juan-dc6yf3 жыл бұрын
People forgetting bell would be dead without adler
@muhammadasimsyed14943 жыл бұрын
What's the point when Adler kills you later on
@Glocky673 жыл бұрын
Bell and Adler shoot each other that means the black ops 1 and 2 is begin
@v12ts.gaming3 жыл бұрын
First Black Ops was before Cold War. So it more of the 1986 flashbacks in BO2
@skippy78113 жыл бұрын
Hatty hattington is that you??
@apexivory49823 жыл бұрын
The bad ending is the best ending!!
@TheProtagonist20203 жыл бұрын
Nope.
@pindol692 жыл бұрын
@@TheProtagonist2020 YES
@PokeShadow77 Жыл бұрын
get Tracey in the line
@OhukaisMies_543 жыл бұрын
What happens if u pick the bad ending but dont radio the ambush
@haizad74703 жыл бұрын
You get shot but the nuke detonates
@OhukaisMies_543 жыл бұрын
@@haizad7470 ty
@Pablo-V3 жыл бұрын
9:55 Yeah, Bell could've helped you so that you could kill him afterwards, right? This is why this ending is the best for me. Fuck WW3, I hate fake-ass betraying cucks, plain and simple.
@mustafarami84243 жыл бұрын
The truth ending is good because mason and woods get to live but the lie ending is bad cause they die in it
@faultyblue99343 жыл бұрын
@Aaron Warrior but millions die as result of the nuclear warhead going off and most likely causing WW3, I wouldn’t consider that good no matter how much you hate Reagan
@gypsy33643 жыл бұрын
Mate the whole nuclear arsenal that blow up was with American Nukes . America wanted to stop the USSR and stop anyone from going there with a metaphorically gun to the head to basically say you either on the American side or you die that was their opinion Russia just decided that they had enough so bombs was the solution
@faultyblue99343 жыл бұрын
@@gypsy3364 the nukes were in case Russia invaded, it was basically a sort of scorched earth tactic Also killing millions just because “screw Reagan” is a piss poor reason
@gypsy33643 жыл бұрын
They were also used to keep countries in and yes I agree on screw Reagan idea that's a bad reason to set of a bomb
@yakro34493 жыл бұрын
@@gypsy3364 So you think that detonating them nukes is a good thing, how selfish you are lmfao