I really want to see the entire version of this play now...what a stellar performance in just two and a half minutes.
@globsteruk13 жыл бұрын
30 years on and this remains one of the most vivid memories from all theatre trips I have ever made. The only thing that concerned me about the interpretation was whether it was designed to show that "it was all in Hamlet's mind". After all, the first scene of the play is one in which a group of his (non-mad) friends see the ghost.
@badmovebaker14 жыл бұрын
Well, as I was saying before the narrator chimed in, a huge part of Hamlet's conflict is determining for himself whether it's real, or if he's just mad. I think it's a fascinating interpretation, and I can think of few who could pull it off like Jonathan Pryce.
@seanhenry29219 жыл бұрын
Holy cats, that certainly is an innovative interpretation!
@Naev0w04 жыл бұрын
adieu... adieu... adieu... remember me...
@irish669 жыл бұрын
it reminds me of charles laughton, as the hunchback of notre dame. So I'm not really sure if it's hammy or brilliant.
@PsychedeliciousMelon14 жыл бұрын
@badmovebaker Agreed
@spikeep61415 жыл бұрын
Hello, Tyler. Hello Nasty.
@CrimsonTy4 жыл бұрын
Last comment on here was 4 years ago. I've decided to add the next newest comment
@theskilled9914 жыл бұрын
this possession idea does not work for me at all. Rather than help the audience suspend their disbelief it rather makes the poor actor look ridiculous.
@CUTEMKUltras5 жыл бұрын
I agree. It brings into question Hamlet's entire modus operandi. Does he kill Claudius based on voices that possess him? If so, how is he justified in that? How did Barnardo, Marcellus and Horatio witness this 'ghost' on the battlements? It wasn't a subjective haunting, it was witnessed by other people. Hamlet's conumdrum isn't that the ghost isn't real, it's that it isn't really his father, but a demonic spirit tempting him to do evil and be damned. It's actually a very superficial interpretation, which comes across as gimmicky.
@spikeep61415 жыл бұрын
But what happens to Hamlet *is* ridiculous - he is his own father (and his own son). His Father’s name is ‘Hamlet’ - So The Prince is Hamlet, Son of Hamlet (fat, and scant of breath); And The King is Hamlet, Father of Hamlet (who is dead).