Hantek 1008c GMLAN Hi/Lo HS CAN Testing

About as good as it gets with the 1008. Not the best waveform capture but it will work for DIY diagnostics. The vehicle is a 2013 Chevy Cruze 1.4

[@Backalleydiagnostics]

Thats pretty cool, i never used my 1008 for can yet. I know you mentioned Hscope, i did not know if you were aware of the digital module. i believe it is around 15 dollars, i purchased it for my 512 but did not have a chance to use it yet. it decodes the packets for a few protocols for you. By the way,how do you like the breakout box? i have the same one but have not had a chance to use it yet. Any issues with it ? thanks and great vid!

[@MarcBchannel]

@manelishi13 Ya I can see the 1008 is limited for some things. The resolution is pretty bad but I was able to get a decent enough capture for a cam crank correlation on hall effect sensors. Mite not be so good for other types. You could possibly spot CAN issues I'm not sure. I'm pretty new to oscopes. What I dislike the most about the 1008 is the low sampling and limited buffer. I just started using the HS502 on Hscope and wow is it good. I was getting ready to bite the bullet on a Pico 4425A but I think I'll hold off. I think I can get most things done with these two scopes. Love the Hscope features. Great resolution and love being able to record long captures. Ya that BOB is good so far. I don't have anything to compare as I'm new to this stuff. Thx for commenting. I really like your vids. I've learned alot from them👍

[@Backalleydiagnostics]

@MarcBchannel Thanks man , I appreciate it! I am sure with can bus the 1008 can spot a problem. The digital module for hscope separates the packets and identifies alot of issues. I have not used it yet myself but figured for the future it's good to have. I feel you om the pico , I was looking for something In between and surprised the 502 and 512 with hscope bridge the gap and actually end up on the budget side. They do more than I imagined and plenty more than I discovered! Keep on testing!