The circle has centre O, so its equation is x^2 + y^2 = r^2 The curves meet so you can square the x and y values of the parametric curve and put them in the circle equation for an equation in r (make the double angle trig function a single angle one first) Then you can use b^2-4ac = 0 since the points only touch to find r
@2trilltochill7 ай бұрын
For part b you can achieve the answer by differentiating both equations and equating them so that you get -2x=18x^2-9x^3 solving gives you correct x and correct y which you can use Pythagoras for to find radius
@MintyMit7 ай бұрын
For part b I used the discriminant = 0 for the quadratic (well quartic, hidden quadratic) to get 10/3
@MintyMit7 ай бұрын
Oh nvm u showed it
@MorgKev7 ай бұрын
r^2 = x^2 + y^2 ... rewrite y^2 in terms of x^2... then get d(r^2)/dx and set to zero to find x (at max r^2). Then y^2 follows by substitution... and hence r^2.
@kausarlolz7 ай бұрын
hi sir! i was able to do part a very easily using the trig trianlge we often do in mechanics questions (slope inclined at sinx = 4/5 etc) i set sint = x/2. made a trig triangle and subbed in cost into y = 3(2sintcost) and squared both sides :)
@MrAstburyMaths7 ай бұрын
Great job! I’m now a massive fan of trig triangles for parametrics!
@hound8196 ай бұрын
im cooked
@lol.12966 ай бұрын
CHILL BROSKI
@Bob-zo8gk6 ай бұрын
its over for us bro
@hound8196 ай бұрын
Walking into hall rn, will tell how cooked I get 👦🏻👦🏽👦🏾👦🏿 or 🧑🏽🍳
@lol.12966 ай бұрын
how was it guys
@Thorfinn_editZ16 ай бұрын
@@hound819how was it
@AITunesUK Жыл бұрын
at first sight, I thought this was easy enough and just found the stationary point and got distance to that which is sqrt(11) and thought it was easy enough lol, because it looks like the circle just touches the maxima on the diagram. I could not have been more wrong, this is slightly trickier than I anticipated.
@adailyfact7 ай бұрын
I did the exact same thing.
@stan45626 ай бұрын
7:50 Why is r maximised at dr/dx = 0 ? Thanks!
@theupson6 ай бұрын
good lord, it wants to be easy, you just have to let it. a: the objective becomes 9sin^2(2t)=4ksin^2(t)[4-4sin^2(t)]. 1 double angle identity, 1 pythagorean identity and cancel. b: max x^2+y^2 subject to y^2 = 9x^2 - 9/4x^4 just freaking substitute. its conspicuously easy, closest thing to tricky is remembering that x has a range literally five lines start to finish
@michsmlo5 ай бұрын
it's literally that easy.......... it's difficult to find any "tricks" in it (sorry i already tried to be humble..)
@AG-ql1sy Жыл бұрын
Any chance jack k is heading to oxford or Cambridge?😂
@charliesmith24116 ай бұрын
good luck
@rheajohri2706 Жыл бұрын
Hello, thank you so much for this video. I also fell into the trap of parametric differentiation in part b. I wanted to ask at 11:15 why the discriminant = 0 is used? Wouldn't it be discriminant > 0 as there are 4 solutions (not one)?
@AlevelStudent-c1y Жыл бұрын
I have the same question. Also why wouldn’t parametric diff be valid. Can that not be inferred from the diagram?
@ainharamk550 Жыл бұрын
I think is because in the quadratic equation he uses ‘u’ which equals “x^2” so essentially one solution of “u” equals 2 solutions of “x”, also if the circle was smaller there’ll be 8 solutions, and ig that’s when the discriminant will be >0, So I guess 4 intersections is the same as 1 and 8 will be the same as 2, as the discriminant is normally to do with tangents to a curve, and here the circle is symmetrical in all the axis and C1 also looks symmetrical in all axis
@14bobyroby Жыл бұрын
You're the MATHS BOSS!
@MrAstburyMaths Жыл бұрын
You’re so kind! 😄
@yasminh6 ай бұрын
ty!
@onaopemipoadeniyi8 ай бұрын
Hi Sir, why is dr/dx = 0 when for max r at 7:39?
@Lexler34 Жыл бұрын
Great explanation, i was able to part a) but part b) i forgot about doing Rmax as a derivitive ❤
@AlevelStudent-c1y Жыл бұрын
Hi Sir, For the 2023 maths papers, should we expect 16+ questions. Over the years Edexcel have put more and more questions in the papers., so I’m a little anxious about timing
@sulamakamyon12345 Жыл бұрын
when you do b squared- 4ac,=0 doesnt that only refer to equations where its tangent ( one intersection point), however for the circle there are multiple intersections.
@sreenathbondilli8402 Жыл бұрын
you are findin the r value that has no solutions, which is anything greater than 10/3 if less than 10/3 you would get 4 solutions, the equation does apply as we are saying that there are no solutions when b2 -4ac
@billyunited1191 Жыл бұрын
As a year 13 student I got part a correct and part b as root 11 so correct to 2 sig figs lol. Very tricky
@infintysolar15399 ай бұрын
Yes, this is what I got, I think we both did Pythagoras on the max point, on desmos the point is actually a little below i think, the circle is not rlly correct, I was shattered when I got it wrong tho
@Ace__Matic7 ай бұрын
same
@AlevelStudent-c1y Жыл бұрын
Hi Sir, wouldn’t you make the discriminant greater than 0 since C1 and C2 are intersecting multiple times ?
@sentheaS7 ай бұрын
Old comment I know but no you wouldn't . The quadratic you are setting equal to zero is not the quadratic that draws the graph in the diagram (there isn't a quadratic that draws a graph in the diagram, it has to be defined parametrically). If you go ahead and look at the graph of the quadratic with r substituted into it, you will see that there is one (repeated) real solution. Another way you can understand it is the following (I'm not sure if this is necesarily why or if I'm just guilty of confirmation bias), if you graph the cartesian y = 3x(1-(x/2)^2)^(1/2), you will get one half of the curve C1. You get the parts of C1 occupying the bottom left and top right quadrants. When graphing the cartesian form of a circle (C2), you will only ever get one half of the circle, otherwise you wouldn't be graphing a function (functions can not have one-to-many mappings). As such, you cannot graph the cartesian form of C1 & C2 such that they have more than one intersection. cartesian C1 will always occupy two diagonally opposed quadrants, whether you graph C1 or -C1. C2 will always occupy either the top two quadrants or the bottom two. Just a note as to how I got that function for y: I did the first part differently, I got to y = 3xcost, then to get cost in terms of x, I did x/2 = sint, (x/2)^2 = (sint)^2, (x/2)^2 = 1 - (cost)^2, (cost)^2 = 1 - (x/2)^2, cost = sqrt(1-(x/2)^2), then plugged it into y = 3xcost. As I square rooted (cost)^2, it's actually y= +/- 3x(1-(x/2)^2)^(1/2). If you just square root the funtion y^2 from part a, then you will end up with a graph for modulus y, destroying this information.
@adrianhall3068 ай бұрын
I was also thinking of using the discriminate however why did you have to let u=x^2 to do this does the discriminate only work on highest power 2?
@adrianhall3068 ай бұрын
Never mind I answered my question makes sense😂
@gaurighosalkar4294 Жыл бұрын
Sir, which year paper is this?
@2cutzaky055 Жыл бұрын
It’s a Mock Set
@uvwv Жыл бұрын
Very interesting question… dare I say even enjoyable lol
@MrAstburyMaths Жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@RingsideReels Жыл бұрын
I did it throught modelling it as a quadratic, knowing it as 1 solution and got 10/3
@lookuptartaria7030 Жыл бұрын
I prefer the second solution
@BBK5838 ай бұрын
which paper is this from?? great video btw
@Chocovanillawaffle7 ай бұрын
Mock set 2 paper 1 pure I believe
@UNKNOWN-jk6wv7 ай бұрын
which year pls? @@Chocovanillawaffle
@ramens7 ай бұрын
GOAT
@highimdamon71016 ай бұрын
p Goat
@ahmedmustafa7753 Жыл бұрын
Why can you not stake dy/dx for part 2 and find out the value of t for when the grad is 0
@nabil1x Жыл бұрын
do you mean to diff. parametrically then set dy/dx=0? the points of intersection btwn C1 and C2 do not occur at a flat gradient
@AlevelStudent-c1y Жыл бұрын
I took that approach as well. Can’t it be inferred from the diagram that the points if intersection are the maximum points of C1?
@AlevelStudent-c1y Жыл бұрын
I understand that its not stated explicitly, but allot of maths is inferring from diagrams/wording
@UNKNOWN-jk6wv7 ай бұрын
@@AlevelStudent-c1y it's never just inferring there's always something that tells you explicitly