Understanding how CHRONOLOGICAL DISLOCATION conceals HISTORICAL TRUTH - Ralph Ellis

[@celebs007]

Ralph is the true Holy Father!

[@slickwillie3376]

Ellis' work is particularly inspired. Best damned rabbit hole I ever jumped in.

[@RalphEllis]

And it goes a long, long way down... R

[@johnjohnson1657]

Some look at the time of 3 hrs 8 minutes 45 seconds for a video and they move along. I, on the other hand, see I'm about to get 3 hrs 8 minutes and 45 seconds worth of knowledge. Another great video. Kudos.

[@davida.taylor8444]

Yeah, same here and even still these sometimes aren't long enough!

[@johnjohnson1657]

@@davida.taylor8444 I agree 100%...I could sit for hours watching this kind of stuff on one video.

[@neilbrookins8428]

That’s not 3 hours of knowledge- it’s years worth of knowledge crammed into 3 hours.

[@donovanwilliamsroker4734]

I was one who thought this was too long. Boy am I glad I decided to stick it out. Wonderfully amazing!!

[@Lenergyiskey358]

I love the long ones. They tell me that the topic must be good or else the interviewee would knock it on the head 😂. So I give them a go.

[@atheistmom3591]

I am beyond excited to watch this interview. Huge, huge fan of Ralph Ellis! ❤️

[@forensicfaithinprofiling]

BRILLIANT interview. I Learned so much. Thanks so much, gentlemen.

[@TexasRose682]

I am brand new into finally realizing the truth (just about a week now, even though I have had questions about the validity of certain aspects my entire life). Things I am learning from others is almost overwhelming and, not being a historian or theologian, it is really difficult to fully wrap my head around. Thank you so much, Tim. Even though I have no clue where I can even begin to actually research truths, your videos are introducing so many very intelligent individuals with a plethora of information and areas that I can definitely research. I think this video may take me a few times of watching to even begin to fully grasp everything that is discussed. I do still need to go back and watch the previous interview with Ralph as well. Again, thank you so much for all that you do to help us in learning the truth and how to actually being to research it (for those of us who are challenged in that area lol)

[@Ronnymikkonen2686]

This is great! Love every minute.

[@joycesky5041]

GREAT VIDEO ! I’ve listened to Ralph’s videos before and he’s awesome! Very informative and very intelligent and I’ve learned a lot from him. Everything he says from his research makes perfect sense. Ralph has put so much work and time into his research for many year’s and it’s so gratifying to learn from him. Keep up the GREAT WORK Tim and Ralph. Much love from way up north here in Portland Maine (U.S.)

[@bhougland18]

That was mind blowing 😮

[@naturalexplorer]

Thank you Ralph. The connection of the exiled Hyksos back into Egypt with the sea people invasions is another super powerful arrow of brilliant insight into the heart of this whole deceptive charade. The United Monarchy of Israel linked with these sea people invasions is similar mechanism of so many of your other monumental findings. Seems the key that has unlocked this whole entire charade over and over is to look for the common unknowns. See whether a different time or location change can piece them together. The whereabouts of the United Monarchy of Israel is unknown. Where the sea people's of the Mediterranean derived from is largely unknown. Look for either an alternative chronology or an alternative location and the two seemingly disconnected unknowns connect the jigsaw puzzle together very nicely. Time and again. Tanis becoming Jerusalem brings the charade undone in similar way that the chronological chasm of 40 years puts King Izas of Edessa into the biblical story as King Jesus leader of the Jewish revolt. The list of brilliant findings just goes on and on. Absolutely monumentally outstanding research. The intricate and meticulous application of this really powerful etymology profound. Seems to me you crossed a critical barrier some time ago where the age old fabric of this deception has been broken beyond repair. Exposed to the light strongly enough that it can no longer be held together anymore. Like the unravelling of a contorted, twisted ball of wool designed into the fairy dust image of divine robes it all unfolds. Nature can now only take its course and the web of lies and deception is set in motion to implode in on itself. Correspondingly, the jigsaw puzzle for a reasoned reality of the how and why of so much that has happened becomes increasingly clearer as time moves on. Truth revealed and a recovery from all this multi millennia long sorcery of deception can unfold. Your research reveals what has happened, you understand it well and communicate it well. Across numerous forums so that gradually more and more people of various different ilk are now becoming increasingly aware. This is a growing potent force against highly likely the deepest deception of all time - on an abundance of levels. You're a hero Ralph - I don't think there is anything of greater magnitude to the overall spiritual history of humanity than what has unfolded from your intricate, meticulous research. Words cannot express the monumental good your great research has let out of the box. Thanks seems far too little and I hope the accolades come your way big time. They are very well earned and deserved.

[@RalphEllis]

Thanks, Ralph.

[@naturalexplorer]

@@RalphEllis Very welcome - all very thoroughly earned and deserved.

[@gregsimkins4628]

Very well said

[@Thor-Orion]

The Dorians are heavily misunderstood because of their light hair and eyes the Greeks thought they were from Northern Europe, but the Hyksos originally came from the Pontic Steppe. Look up Sintashta Chariot Graves and you’ll see your Hyksos. The spoked chariot wheel is instrumental in the rise of the Hyksos as were the domesticated warhorses. Look up where all modern domestic horses come from and where the spoked chariot wheel was invented and when. There’s literally only one place they can be from. This group is closely associated with the origins of the so called Indo Europeans, look up the origins of Haplogroup R1A1. You’ll find the same answer for all of these; Pontic Steppe 2,200-1,750 bc. These people are the Scythians. Also the Sintashta are clearly related to the Hittites, and it just so happens the Lion of Judah is VERY likely a Hittite symbol. Look up the gates of Hattusa if you don’t believe me. And the Hittites were great astronomers, look up Yazilikaya the Hittite temple complex within walking distance of Hattusa. It just so happens that the widow of Ramses II asks a Hittite king to send her one of his sons to marry. Also, the Scythians were well known for wearing cloaks and carrying daggers when they weren’t in full armor, does that sound like the Sicarii to you?

[@mnag3046]

As a ex fundamentalist Christian what always bothered me about the Old Testament was the subtle hermetic and Egyptian motifs This makes total sense to me

[@justindearmond1]

Great show! After 3 attempts over the last few days i finally finished this episode. Ralph is so full of knowledge, love hearing him share with us.

[@wolfshedler5898]

thank you for your insights it has changed my world view and your research has enriched my life

[@peggychurchill5518]

INTERESTING BACKGROUND. LOVE RALPH'S BOOKS, INTERVIEWS & LECTURES. THE MORE MY VISION WEAKENS, THE MORE I LISTEN TO INTERVIEWS AND LECTURES.

[@Beegee1952]

Wish I had discovered Ralph when I first left religion! He is so full of logical history in proper context. Talk about connecting the dots!

[@OkillzDuD101]

Ellis’s point in the opening about the Hyksos being kicked out of Egypt then pretending that they were (without cause) a persecuted minority in a region where they actually had immense power - crying out as they strike you, as it were - reminds me of something from 20th century history. I think it involved a man with a mustache and similar subsequent pretending.

[@JessSienna]

This has to be one of my best interviews thanks again Tim 😊

[@pameladeleone135]

I loved every bit of it !!!!!

[@jeffreygrantsmith]

Absolutely brilliant conversation. Thank you.

[@billguthrie2218]

Awesome interview. So fascinating how the OT writers just tweeked existing historical stories and created their own history. Seems pretty undeniable. .

[@lucasroche8639]

It's more rewriting than creating or inventing their history

[@billguthrie2218]

@@lucasroche8639 Isn't rewriting just that? Creating or inventing their own history?

[@joycesky5041]

My husband was a high ranking Free Mason so I’m familiar with Hiram Abiff and many other names Ralph mentioned…it’s all so AMAZING!

[@atheistmom3591]

Bought some of Ellis’s books. Can’t wait to dive in. This is the most compelling and sensible explanation I’ve heard for Bible history yet.

[@RalphEllis]

Happy reading…. R

[@yacuvitzraim301]

Lol how did that turn out ?

[@loriannepresnell7951]

Ralph is the greatest! His books, essays, lectures, and interviews are brilliant! AND he's such a hottie!

[@capitalisa]

Omg. I'm blown away.

[@AleksandraTheGreat]

Excellent this video will get me thru my boring day at work starting to listen

[@lorat3084]

Hi Tim, thanks for the time and effort you put into these interviews. Just wondering if you’ve thought of extending your interviews to a podcast format?

[@HarmonicAtheist]

Hi, Lora! I want to but I barely have time as it is. But I definitely see the value. I am aiming to be doing YT full time sometime in 2022, and once I cross that bridge, I'll add podcast format immediately. Thanks for asking, and sorry for the delay in making it available. --Tim

[@annbouchard6564]

You are awesome Ralph!

[@michaelwoodsmccausland5633]

The thirst for a new group of Shepherds is underway ! Your Scribing work is a Dymndsnthsky! Shine Bright! MWM

[@jitendraisaacs3019]

Thank you for bringing Ralph to this channel ❤️

[@daviesp2003]

Its a great interview I follow the books of Ellis they are great and I have a PHD in art history and a master in history both on the Middle east.

[@chrisnewbury3793]

More establishment-types like you need to come out and support, or refute with evidence, people like Ralph Ellis, lest you permanently lose your credibility. Modern Academia is an absolute joke right now.

[@dmilstone5709]

I've only started listening to this podcast but even just 20 or 30 minutes into it I have to agree with much of what Mr. Ellis is saying. I always thought it very suspicious that the bible refers to the leader of Egypt simply as Pharaoh, to keep the reader from pinpointing the exact time in history the exodus/story occurred. IN MY OPINION....the writers of the later chronological books of the bible borrowed HEAVILY from earlier literature and from many of the earlier civilizations stories and "myths" (a flood myths that seems to be straight out of the epic of Gilgamesh, creation myths etc) even going as far as making it seem as though they were predicting events or being a "profit" about specific events...after those events had already unfolded. It's widely accepted that the gospels were written after the "fall of Jerusalem"...and if that is the case it is easy to "predict" things that have already come to pass. Not only is history written by the victor's, but it is often written/remembered mostly by the most eloquent stories of the time. It just seems to me that much of the bible is based on events that very likely really happened, but crucial facts were either added, omitted, changed or borrowed from other tales/stories or myths that were most likely passed along orally at the time. From what I understand, only roughly 5% of the population were literate around the "time of Christ" and the time many biblical stories came into being. Very few of the stories we are familiar with from the bible were written in the time the author is describing/writing about and probably even fewer are written by who the book is supposedly written by. From what I've read, Moses never wrote ANY of the 'books of Moses', (they do seem to be written many hundreds of years after Moses would have lived) and it's widely accepted that all 4 Gospels of the New Testament were written by people who never met Jesus and seemed to be in the earliest written gospels about just a wise, influential man, then in the later books the story grows to include the 'virgin birth' , early childhood preaching, an incredible amount of daily miracles in his later life, water into wine, multiplying loaves of bread, defying Satin in the wilderness, healing the sick, killing a fig tree, walking on water, healing the blind, raising the dead, everything he spoke was a wise, humble, peaceful life altering message while at the same time the god he prayed to seemed to represent the total opposite (wanting whole cities destroyed & burned and all the people slaughtered including the women & children) being sacrificed by his own father/god so that all mankind would be forgiven for the original sin of Gods first human creation (first man & woman Adam & Eve), his own personal resurrection etc, and if you do enough digging into previous myths of other civilizations 'gods'.... all these things had been done before...just never codified into a single book that appears to mix true historical events & people along with an ever-growing miraculously expanding story of one good man who only wanted to spread peace and teach others to be kind and love one another. He didn't claim to be God and never had any desire to start a new religion, yet after he died his life & story got hijacked by numerous writers. What started out as a simple story of an exceptionally good man grew into unbelievable tales of divinity and miracles to the point where religious figures held firm control over kings, governments & entire countries for thousands of years! Why is there such a lack of ANYONE writing ANYTHING down about Jesus in his own lifetime? Only after he had been dead several decades did anyone bother to commit pen to papyrus. If the Holy Bible is divinely inspired/ 'Gods true word' then why do all four gospels have very differing accounts of all the important aspects of Jesus's life and death? It's NOT a bad thing to question the truth and accuracy of biblical stories that are purported to be 100% true accounts of human history from the creation of earth, oceans, sunlight, stars & the heavens, creation of all plantlife and diversity of all animal life across the land, sky & sea, origin and history of all mankind and the passing down of Gods most important laws and morality (nearly half of which pertains to obeying/worshipping only him). The time for blind faith in a book full of half truths and contradictions has passed. Enlightened minds seek truth wherever it may lead.

[@smokebreaktime]

The Romanized Josephus is key to laying out the story.

[@lucysmith4367]

Breathtaking

[@greylock1959]

You nailed it. Freeing people from a prison.

[@johngibbs799]

Ralph is the best. He is not in it for ego. He sincerely seeks the truth. It's odd that he says he's an atheist. I think most of what he is saying will someday be considered factual. 😇

[@chrisnewbury3793]

Why is it odd? Ralph has said many times that he believes in a higher power. Not all atheists believe the same way.

[@chikkipop]

@@chrisnewbury3793 What is a "higher power" and on what basis would anyone believe such a thing existed?

[@chrisnewbury3793]

@@chikkipop on what basis should anybody believe a thing like you exists?

[@chikkipop]

@@chrisnewbury3793 So you can't answer my questions? I didn't think so.

[@chrisnewbury3793]

@@chikkipop lol I don't answer stupid questions I mock them

[@robertvandeloo]

Would you consider putting a number of your videos? It would be convenient for reference. Your videos are important for the growth of mankind

[@myxcapital4179]

Ralph is the man!

[@cdniracer]

Ralph is great .............this is better then Jfk assassination investigation

[@africaourhome1]

If David married Bathsheba, his daughter, I wanted the interviewer to ask him what he knows about David killing Uriah to marry his wife Bathsheba. Also, he needed to have asked him about how King Solomon came to marry 700 wives and 300 concubines. That was missing from the man's narrative.

[@HarmonicAtheist]

Good follow up questions. Ralph will likely respond here once he has a chance to review comments. I'll also write these questions down for a follow up interview down the line. Thanks! --Tim

[@RalphEllis]

Uriah was Absalom. If you trace the names, they coincide. (Absalom is also called Uriel.) And of course David killed Absalom in battle too. Absalom had married his sister, perhaps without his father's consent. R

[@Theodorus5]

Great to see Mr Ellis back

[@dereksparkes7098]

I LOVE RALTH HES EXPANDED MY MIND BIG TIME ..THANKS TIM

[@RalphEllis]

Shame that Harmonic will not have me back on the show. You will have to ask him why. R

[@ChristianRThomas]

Just as a confirmation for those that have doubts about what Ralph says about getting up the pyramid, I did it when I was about 11 years old and it really wasn't hard. That was a touch over 50 years ago (Jeez! Probably 1972.) and I don't suppose you're just allowed to start climbing these days, but you were back then - or at least it was so laisser faire (or just disorganised!) that no one seemed to mind. It was a bit of a breeze, really, and I probably could still manage it today, though I might stop once or twice. The whole site was a kind of free-for-all with street vendors pestering you to buy camel rides, scarab beetle carved in God knows what, or mini Sphinxes in cheap alabaster. (I bought both! 😂) Surprisingly, because I went to Marlborough College, I have also been up both Silbury Hill and what's known as "The Mound", which is inside the College grounds, and is/was supposed to be Merlin's burial site. When I was there (Jan '75 to Dec '79) it was generally known that both earthworks had been excavated in the (then) recent past and absolutely nothing had been found! I remember being rather disappointed by that fact and thought they might not have tried hard enough. 😂 LOL - but they might not have. As children we climbed Silbury Hill just for fun and The Mound to smoke cigarettes, though we didn't do it that often because the steps up it were visible from all angles and it was definitely "out of bounds" in the School Rules. For the "disobedient" crowd, it would have been a shame not to have gone up it at least once while you were there. Obviously, given the location, Avebury was fairly close by and we went there a few times, both officially and unofficially, though were clueless what to make of it, but it was on the way to a fair choice of good country pubs - again, sometimes within the rules and sometimes outside them. (It'll probably strike Americans as astonishing, but we were allowed by the school to go to pubs if we were within the law to do so at that age, which was basically being 16. Having said that, no pubs, either within the town or in its hinterland, ever had a problem with serving 14 year-olds, though we ourselves were often timorous in asking and usually sent the oldest-looking of us to the bar to order drinks - though of course they knew what was going on. Kindly, they didn't want to ruin our night. :) Tim, I didn't know until a couple of days ago that you had had Ralph on your channel. Like you, I went through a period of being a Bible believing Christian, which I discarded about 14 years ago, but still with an eye to what was the actual truth. I feel exactly the same way as you said, that what Ralph has revealed and explained has acted as a healing to what I consider is just straightforward abuse and misdirection. I thought I'd put it behind me and marshalled all the arguments against it (to the point of being contemptuous of it all) but Ralph's work, and quite fantastic putting together of the true reality, has dug out buried doubts in my decision to discard Christianity, and flattened them. It's actually not that distant from what I imagine an exorcism to be, with the Demons having been in service of the Church. For a fair picture of where I am, I still have doubts about whether I'm OK or doing the right thing, but I'm not going to hark back to a "Christian" view of whether it's "OK". That's entirely Ralph's work, which I still need to learn more about. It is a tremendous relief and it's a liberation.

[@danbreeden5481]

Fascinating

[@Simon.the.Likeable]

@ 10:45 - "Most Zionists don't believe in God but they do believe He promised them Palestine." - Ilan Pappé

[@sarahforrester6421]

This is so interesting. Thanks. I am a fan of in-depth!

[@tabletalk33]

Which of Ellis' books should we read first?

[@RalphEllis]

For Old Testament: Jesus, Last of the Pharaohs. For New Testament: Cleopatra to Christ. r

[@chrisnewbury3793]

I never realized the tombs in Egypt were so similar to the ones in Newgrange. Chalk another point up to Conor MacDari.

[@todbeard8118]

When he said "Alexander the Great Jew"- Hilarious!

[@shaunigothictv1003]

The bible is actually a book with stories set in real geographical places featuring real homosapien groups/cultures - but the stories are purely mythological. Talking Snakes, (genesis 3), talking donkeys (numbers 22) etc. Not to mention a worldwide flood that systematically wiped out every known homosapien group on the planet - EXCEPT eight people who managed to trap millions of animals and insects and physically herd them onto a small boat complete with enough food for ALL the animals and humans for a year. Geologists and scientists have all destroyed the global flood theory many times already aswell as many other supposed events in the BUYBULL..

[@Truthseeker0926]

FACTS!!@

[@RalphEllis]

It is only mythological, if you cannot find the historical foundations. Once you see what the Tanakh was talking about (mostly about Hyksos pharaohs), you begin to see that it is a fairly detailed and accurate historical account. Ralph

[@renny3816]

Are we not using the term “human” anymore? I will stick with “human.”

[@RalphEllis]

Shaun - the snake has many meanings. But the one I like for the cobra, is that it is the Nile river - which flares our into the head of a cobra. It is a symbol of the nation. Have you never heard a nation speak? R

[@shaunigothictv1003]

Ralph what's your email mate?

[@Rickyroo1980]

Mountane lol.. Great video, fascinating information

[@justindearmond1]

another thought Ralph while im in here cleaning my kitchen so i can cook dinner for my kids......did the ancients think of marriage in the same way we do? Were these marriages more political and ceremonial in nature or did they take it as seriously as we do today, with it entailing love, children, monogamy commitment to a person under god(s) (i know that was out the window back then)....did they willingly engage in incest and if so was it for reasons other than securing their bloodlines? what i guess im trying to ask is, was the practice of marrying your own blood seen as taboo? I know that this was common practice among the royals even to this day but do the ancient texts say anything about what the common folk thought of these sorts of acts? The only reason i can see for doing that is to "keep it in the family" so to speak to tighten your grip on power. Surely these royals knew this was shunned upon in the day to day life of everyday people.

[@RalphEllis]

Most royal marriages were political - look at Henry VIII, with England marrying Spain…. R

[@torjusekkje6264]

RALPH IS THE MAN!

[@GrammieK12o6]

Wow. Thank you.

[@michaelwoodsmccausland5633]

Joseph P Ferrel Michael Cremo and Ralp Ellis upon Common Ground for Objective Scientific Journalistic Discourse! Shine Bright! MWM@

[@ravenpoe689]

So the idea of 72 genders was mentioned briefly...what is your opinion of it and the lgbtq? What are good books on theses topics? I also want to know what zodiac books you recommend? Thanks.

[@paulfensome1404]

I am not happy with Ralph , very disappointed the Video Ended. A 12 Hour Video is needed ASAP It pisses me off that we have been lied too about Everything , nothing is True I know Hell doesn't exist but i wish it did for those Liars that deceive us

[@BearsArms45]

Egypt, Babylon to the Persians. A people so widely hated as the foreign kings that their names and faces were scratched out and the spells carved on their tombs face inwards so their souls may never escape again. A foreign group is conquered or assimilated and by the hosts choice to take in rather than exterminate; they are subverted, usurped and receive a “stab in the back” as it were. The backlash against this subversion and selling out is then recorded as just another of millions of attempts at extermination that the poor souls endured. I wonder if, in light of such a clear, concise, and in your face game plan…. Looking at things like visigothic Spain being sold out by the 5’th column within that coordinated with every single Islamic attack against Spain (and most of the rest of Europe) until finally the Hyksos sea people within LITERALLY open the gates of Toledo to the invaders causing the Islamic conquest and subsequent 700 years war of reconquista. And when the benevolent King and Queen retake control the enemies within are allowed to stay under very lax terms until a few decades later the refusal to abide these simple terms results in the Alhambra decree. yet another of the 1,030 times that they would be expelled from 109 different places throughout time. If with the same eyes you watch exiled subverters and foreigners housed and financed by their rich sea people banker brothers in the U.S. until they’re loaded with gold and sent into Russia as the Bolshevik Revolution to slaughter another several million native Russians and take over. If they move into Germany with the same intentions, are too strongly opposed, some flee to the U.S. and more of Europe where they’re welcomed directly into the heart of Colombia University and the Ivy League to continue drumming up social Marxist hate against the natives while the others remain in Europe as communist rulers over the ashes to continue slaughtering more Europeans until yet again…. Like germany in 45, Hungary in 56, and later, from their usurped and renamed “Soviet Union” The natives for no reason rise up in some unexplainable anti-shem fury and try to exterminate the innocent oppressed minority. This time…. fleeing to a land they were expelled from 2,000 years earlier, now under control of the British, and bombing the king David hotel and waging war of terrorism against the English until the English flee quietly in the night…. Ruled yet again by Hyksos sea people judeo Bolshevik communist subverters and terrorists. And finally… If the same mind observes the NGOs, academia, human rights groups, politicians, etc alllll spearheaded by the same tribe of sea-people selling our lands today to the open flood gates of invading, violent, rpest, muhammadens just as they did before… Cromwell. The Jacobin French Revolution and Barruel with the Simonini letter proving the sea people Hyksos financing of it all. Etc. Etc. Etc. Etc. I wonder if Mr. Ellis looks at the constant repetition of the exact same game plan that he already figured out; Over and again throughout time and place. And continues to parrot that all the other instances, more explicitly and governmentally archived than the Genesis of this puzzle that he recognized…..are just bigotted anti-Shem conspiracies, Or if he has the nerve to say- “YeahNah, this is a very dangerous group of subversive misanthropic supremacists bent on perpetual destruction of the hated goy.”

[@dakrontu]

So much of this OT stuff then turns out to be history of the Egyptians. I had long suspected that Judaism grew out of the Egyptian religion.

[@loril.mangold8160]

And how about Amen, an Egyptian God, we seal our prayers with

[@RalphEllis]

Yes, the god of the Sunset. The day is finished…. R

[@michaelwoodsmccausland5633]

When did thy Hysksos arrive from the North

[@chrisnewbury3793]

I'm guessing the story of Avram(Ab Ra Ham) is related ;)

[@peterrabbit1054]

Where does Abraham fit in this context??

[@chrisnewbury3793]

Avram was a Brahmin ;)

[@justindearmond1]

i may have asked you this before Ralph, but do the Exodus have anything to do with the Bronze age collapse? was this war between the Hyksos and Egypt the cause? im only a few minutes in to the interview, forgive me if this is answered later on. Thanks again Ralph, oh yeah by the way, what is your day job? just curious. Take care!

[@RalphEllis]

Yes and no.. The Bronze Age Collapse was caused by the Exodus exiles returning from their Mediterranean refuges. It was the revenge of the Hyksos. R

[@justindearmond1]

@@RalphEllis Thanks Ralph, that event, the Sea Peoples episode, and the Year of 4 Emperors have always stuck in my craw....something fishy was going on with these events...if not why then does history gloss over these pivitol events? "move along, nothing to see here"

[@davidhuehn8527]

By completing this action you are creating a channel and agree to

[@turnerturner3281]

Why does he claim that ancient Egyptian pharaohs had red hair? That sounds a bit bizarre, no?

[@ralph.wahldren]

Min 58 - If someone deserves all that wealth is SuperRalph💪, well and a 10% for me for proposing 🥳!

[@pfylis]

Awesome

[@dakrontu]

Seems to me theologians are the last people you are going to get any agreement from about your ideas because it cuts off their religion at the knees.

[@chrisnewbury3793]

The Academics are just as dogmatic though.

[@michaelwoodsmccausland5633]

Yes We did Auslane/ Absolom MWM

[@elliottpaine9259]

That was a good point to make that if you go to a site that "gives bible references" so as to look up any verse, and you search "pyramid" you won't find anything bc it wasn't there! Not a good sign when you claim that the Israelites were enslaved in egypt but no mention of the pyramids. of course they wouldve seen a pyramid, lol. Another indication that actual names and cities were changed.

[@RalphEllis]

Indeed. But they ARE there really. They just called them Mt Sinai and Mt Horeb instead. R

[@elliottpaine9259]

@@RalphEllis right

[@michaelwoodsmccausland5633]

The 1929 Canaanite Greek Rosetta Stone! Bahl

[@johnoleary4647]

The big nations giving tribute to the smaller nations in recent history comes ftom Christianity helping the poor., the powers to be only do it , if it helps politically to promote popularity...ieTrump

[@loril.mangold8160]

I told my Mom, if you Really wanted to follow Jesus, you would be Jewish, and you would be speaking Aramaic, because Jesus was a Jew, he never became a Christian, and sooo many Aramaic words do not translate to English. And then King James and many to follow made their own Bibles, edited, what they wanted in their Bible

[@jedgar63]

Interesting, but very questionable. When someone starts out with the sounds like game, my scepticism immediately kicks in. I do appreciate that he looks at the subject rom a unique historical perspective, though.

[@RalphEllis]

Which 'sounds like'? Do remember that the language has changed, from Egyptian to Aramaic. And then often into the Greek. (Although Aramaic is a daughter-language of Egyptian.) R

[@jedgar63]

@@RalphEllis It's no different than saying if someone is named Yeshua/Joshua/Jesus we can assume that they are THAT Jesus. Just because two or more names have the same root doesn't mean the are the same person. When that is your primary basis, my skeptic radar goes straight to maximum. I'm not new to this game.

[@elauren3564]

@@jedgar63 if you watch through this, its not just based on names. It’s one of the sources that help you trace the origin of the gospel story.

[@elauren3564]

@@jedgar63 manual is clearly alao a common alternative of Emmanuel in Spanish and Portuguese. And how many Manël or Emmanuel are there in the gospel story beside the Jesus?

[@jedgar63]

@@elauren3564 Jesus was never named Emmanuel. And Emmanuel has nothing to do with Jesus. Read Isaiah 7. The whole thing, not just the one line.

[@iwilldi]

I want to do some brain storming to connect this draft of history with my still evolving commentary on the gospel of Mark Mark introduces us to Nazareth, the latitude of which is simply refering to the earth radius. So here is some masonery at work. But while Mark introduces Jesus family, he never states that this family actually lived in Nazareth. Mark creates a play following the idea of a straight path. That path starts at the jordan delta, goas up to the see of galilea. Then there is a bifurcated story with an odysee where Jairus daughter obviously means Jerusalem and Gerasa and Genesar refer to the same. Then comes Cesarea Philippi (an important place for Vespasian and Titus) following the mountain, which is the top of the Jordan watershed. Here is an interesting point because that clashes with 1Henoch the watchers. Obviously the 2nd baptism of Jesus is on the mountain of shemiaza. The 3rd baptism is symbolic of eve/pandora making Jesus mortal in the house of simon the leper. After the mountain, Jesus walks almost back to the start, but then deviates at Jericho to turn to Jerusalem. There is some astro symbolism. - the fish, obvious through Peter who sits in the boat with a gentile, and the other pillars. - aquarius represented in the house, where the last supper took place. - obviously there are 12 disciples. But what does the list of dispciple names spell out? Hear o Israel (Simon Jakob) The mercifull man is horse riding! (John Andrew Philip) The student is given a 2nd birth! (Bartholomew Matthew Thomas) Israel (the sons of the ONE) loves to hear with zeal the treacherous jew. (Jakob bar Alphäus Thaddeus Simon the zealot, Judas Iskarioth) That's not exactly the names of the zodiac. But it's funny. So it is clear, that Mark, who did not believe in the eschaton and was no christian by the time of writing used Paul to create satire. Now where are the egyptian parallels? - there is a river with longitudal direction. - the nile has a bustling delta and pyramids where the delta starts, the sea of galilee may represent the same. - there is a great pyramid, in Mark there is the mountain of shemjaza / Hermon. - There is a dualism north south in egypt, in Mark we have the bifurcated story telling jerusalem / pauline views. But unlike the other gospels there is no obvious link to egypt. All you get is a Simon of Cyrene who has to bear Jesus cross. (satire) But the most remarkable joke is the first meeting of John the nazirite and locust man and the man from nazareth in Galilee (which means circle) with the introduction of Jesus. The point being, that current nazareth could onle have gotten that name during it's growth into a town in the 50s. But the establishement of that name at that latitude is a strong signal. Mark also locates the going out of the prophecy of the destruction of Jerusalem 40 years before the destruction. The intervalll between the two destructions is 656 years, which in the tenach is 1000 years less than the year of noahs flood. Vespasian is also the 10th head in Daniels beast with Titus being the little Horn, if you insert Herod the great in stead of Cesar as the first. So there is a lot to digest here. I think there really was a long prepared plan to replace the temple in Jerusalem. Or our official chronologies and history has been doctored to make it look so.

[@totonow6955]

2:57:58 oh boy.

[@jeffreywilliams9299]

I never believed in the Bible you know why, I read it.

[@dakrontu]

King Solomon's 'mining' was the looting of the pyramids! And Mt Sinai is the Great Pyramid! This is brilliant. Why is this not widely known and accepted?

[@chrisnewbury3793]

Because establishment Academia is as dogmatic a religion as any.

[@merilincastro5019]

😊❤🤗🤗🤗👏👏👏👏👏

[@michaelwoodsmccausland5633]

2500 BC the Beakers in Ite

[@eazygamer8974]

The names being the same is a good theory except for the little problem of Champollion translation of the hieroglyphs is incorrect according to the English scholar Thomas young who worked closely with Champollion. Young said it was impossible to make a proper translation with out knowing the original language and even put addendums in his own translation dictionary stating that the translations were basically educated guesses with out the original language to work from

[@RalphEllis]

We actually do have a good idea of the pronunciations, because many Egyptian words were preserved in Egyptian Coptic and Aramaic. Remember the Israelites spent 400 years in Egypt, and people like Joseph spoke fluent Egyptian (and Aramaic is a daughter language of Egyptian). If you look at the Wallis Budge Egyptian dictionary, half the entries are supported by pronunciations in Coptic or Aramaic. R

[@johnsonhunglo1993]

@@RalphEllis : Thanks, Mr. Ellis!!

[@eazygamer8974]

@Ralph Ellis You got me there! Either way great work as usual. I love that you engage with your audience in comments not many people do that.

[@shackledcitizen]

When you speak of masonry, I presume you refer to Freemasonry.

[@RalphEllis]

Absolutely. I am not an operative Mason. R

[@ABLovescrafting]

Really interesting video. I really loved the idea Mr. Ellis brought up. I was really on his side... until he invalidated my gender. I'm really not sure how discounting other people helps his case at all, but what do I know.

[@pwoods100]

Isn't this the same guy who claims that Josephus wrote the gospels? The question that needs to be asked here is - what other scholars are researching this and coming to the same conclusions Ralph Ellis is? I haven't heard of one. He's the only one in the world that seems to be pioneering these theories - and that's not a very good sign to me. Fascinating theories, yes. But credible scholarship? I would have to have several other scholars weigh in on this before I would be convinced.

[@RalphEllis]

Too many scholars have ‘skin in the game’ - they were educated in seminaries, and carry a lot of baggage. You have to be completely independent, to view the gospels rationally. Even the simple suggestion of saying Saul is Josephus is fraught with problems for the ex-theist - because it means that the New Testament was written by an egotistical Jewish traitor, and that Jesus was alive and well in the AD 60s. There are many scholars who cannot handle that. R

[@pwoods100]

@@RalphEllis You're not giving me too much in the way of substance here. You have to be a totally independent scholar to understand the gospels rationally? Sorry, but I'm not buying that one. Because many bible scholars were not educated in seminaries - Richard Carrier being one of them. Besides, I see working completely independently of any kind of scholarly community or institution problematic. There is a reason why people with phds have "skin in the game" and that's because there is a standard of methodology, and rigorous accountability that goes into it. Say what you want about people with degrees, at least they did a certain amount of work that proves they know the methods and historical tests that are used, and are often up on the latest research in the field. If you are working completely without accountability, and no one to peer review your work, then you are setting yourself up to make A LOT of mistakes. You sound way to dismissive of many others in the field that have worked just as hard as you, and who know more than you. Consensus view isn't always incorrect, and often times can be useful in knowing why the majority accept an idea. Consensus view should always be challenged, but like the bible scholar Dr. Josh Bowen said, "if you are going to challenge consensus scholarship, you better have a damn good reason." I understand that any Christian bible scholar wouldn't touch your work with a ten foot pole, but a non-Christian bible scholar has no good reason to not at least look into it - because an atheist like myself doesn't have anything to lose. It seems to me, if your work had any credibility - there would be at least a few other non-Christian historians joining forces with you to promote your work further, and backing you on your claims. I don't see this happening, because whenever I go to search for Jesus - King of Edessa on the internet, the only serious researcher on the subject I can find is Ralph Ellis. How may others have peer reviewed your work? So this tells me that this is fringe scholarship in the most literal sense, and should be looked at cautiously. Surely you are aware that we have evidence of Christianity existing in the early to mid part of the first century - Paul's letters, and letters of early church fathers - forged or not - still describing Christian beliefs way before AD 60. How do you explain that?

[@johnjohnson1657]

Once you read the travel story of both Saul and Josephus you soon realize that the entire route and cities to include the shipwreck part of the story to include the natives of that island are the same. Chew on that for a bit and come to your own conclusion. That's what life is about...learning...not sending out negative vibes and discrediting someone because you disagree about a certain thing...

[@patrickwoods2213]

@@johnjohnson1657 I’m not trying to discredit anyone. But when a certain individual has no certified credentials, no training or background in ancient languages, or any accountability from the academic world, then I have a right to question a person who makes claims about things. Especially if that person gets on forums and calls people names, and attacks others who have pointed out flaws in their work. That’s not something a credible scholar would do, but evidently it’s something Ralph Ellis does. Yes, Josephus was probably a big influence in the writing of the gospels and Acts, but so we’re a myriad of influences. The Bible has tons of ancient mythology and overlapping cultural references- that’s really nothing to write home about. The influence of Josephus does not in any way mean that Josephus wrote the gospels. The gospels were penned in different decades, written by four very distinct voices - much of it copied and embellishments were later added. There is NO way it was written by one individual. That’s just a ludicrous claim.

[@johnjohnson1657]

@@patrickwoods2213 rather unfair knowing how many people who greatly influenced the world in every way had no accreditation whatsoever don't ya think? If you yourself are trained and accredited and have a different point of view than please guide me to your work so I can read it and possibly learn something. If not...that's your reality, not mine.

[@lewhellickson3130]

I have been all about the host and viewpoint and direction for a while. But I have listened to this guest twice. I think he is full of it and drumming up sensationalism for books. My OPINION. Not declared fact. Atheism Ancient Aliens.

[@chrisnewbury3793]

How about picking one specific point to contend instead of vague insults and generalities?

[@erlinggaratun6726]

OMG. Im so tired of that Ellis hack. He builds conclusions on top of chains of assumptions and has no regard for scolarship, because he cannot find any support for his self-obsessed delusions there. I'm logging out. Get better guests, Tim. Please. Anyone but Ralph Ellis.

[@RalphEllis]

So what do you disagree with, Erling? Saying 'wrong' tells us nothing - what is wrong? R

[@HarmonicAtheist]

Hi, Erling, most of my interviews are deconversion stories, but I do try to weave in some research-related interviews. I respectfully disagree with your stance; I am honored to speak with Ralph Ellis and think he has an overwhelming amount to offer. That doesn't mean I take everything that all guests say without critiquing it myself and trying to look at all angles. But I hear Ralph bringing up topics and research dynamics that I do think a lot of us are weak on, and I personally appreciate his work immensely. I respect your decision to feel differently. --Tim

[@johnjohnson1657]

@@RalphEllis ....crickets.... ;)

[@RalphEllis]

@@johnjohnson1657 .... Yup. I always get crickets when I ask what is wrong with my analysis. Trouble for them is all my work comes from the original texts. I am not changing anything, I am just placing a different perspective and interpretation on the meaning. R

[@johnjohnson1657]

@@RalphEllis we live in an age of "reaction" and nothing more unfortunately. People are really good at spewing out doubt but that's it...they have no other purpose in life at the moment and that's okay...the look on their faces will be priceless when they one day realize the error of their ways... ;) You're methodical and logical with facts. What else is there? Don't stop.

[@karenabrams8986]

Marrying your dad. Or your brother. 🤮🤮🤮 I want to delete!

[@RalphEllis]

Depends on the dad or brother, I suppose. R

[@redsonya3088]

Awesome