Damn all y’all so negative, y’all should realize to achieve the dream of green energy if it gonna take numerous different types of energy production. This video didn’t suggest this is the best option it just simply presented another tool that can be used.
@jbw68234 жыл бұрын
Lets throw in everything we can. Nuclear sources still have waste issues but we can always decommision as renewables come on line.
@behruzlanqur63073 жыл бұрын
@No rude ñnjjjjķķķķķĺ
@unhooked253 жыл бұрын
@@redfox435cat What? nuclear is 100% safe? You gotta be joking!
@dirkschneider58793 жыл бұрын
One of the best system so far simpler cheap an easy to install as well as easy to operate. We should see much more of that hopefully soon.
@Maebbie4 жыл бұрын
looking forward to your next video in 2029
@scottm54253 жыл бұрын
Certainly seems an impressive output for something so simple and I like how easy it is to maintain, especially compared to wind turbines. A bit of camouflage on the outside with rocks and sculpting and you'd not even know it was there. Built well it would probably last for at least a century.
@dronzerdanks71632 жыл бұрын
Brilliantly explained given the time constraint in this video. Helpful where it needed to be.
@ja-vg2fh5 жыл бұрын
Portugal has been using wave,and swell power for years.
@IdeasfortheGreenPlanet5 жыл бұрын
@j a Thank you for your comment. The researchers and developers from Portugal (Tecnico Lisboa) are very active in the development of a novel radial self-rectifying impulse air turbine for use in Wave Energy Converters. The Mutriku wave power plant is also a place where researchers can develop and improve turbines, increase efficiency and reliability. This research project is called OPERA and has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program. opera-h2020.eu/
@skotnica933 жыл бұрын
16 to power 250 households... That's a little below 16 households per turbine. A standalone CANDU 650 type reactor can power around 390 000 households. You could make a thousand turbines like that, with all that concrete and still not come close. Not to mention that you can make one CANDU plant with 8 units and the number of households it can power is measured in several millions.
@ShelbyRestorations3 жыл бұрын
But the nuclear waste can be a problem, and the maintenance of it too! along with the safety hazards of any plant... this one can be used on islands and other places by the shore
@skotnica933 жыл бұрын
@@ShelbyRestorations By such a difference in energy production and efficiency the risk is negligible, especially considering how low it is with modern solutions. Also, not every country has islands or a shore and those with shores have limited space, so it'd be a huge waste of space and materials for the production, when you could just build 1 nuclear plant. We are talking about 1 plant vs hundreds of thousands of turbines. It's just not a viable replacement, physically, economically and logically. Recycling nuclear waste, like in France, is more viable in this scenario. As it stands, nuclear power is the most efficient clean power we know.
@metekavruk_Alanya3 жыл бұрын
Yes, This is only good for small villages or private use.
@Hikari_Sakurai3 жыл бұрын
No shit sherlock. You're comparing this to a nuclear powerplant. What r u gonna do with all that nuclear waste then?? Throw it in the ocean?? Bury it?? Eat it??
@ShelbyRestorations3 жыл бұрын
@@Hikari_Sakurai that's my point, nuclear energy isn't the best right now, as waste disposal is a huge problem!
@Gilespargiter3 жыл бұрын
Of course, although not optimised for it most turbines would turn in the same direction if the gas flow comes from either side. This method seems to offer the advantage that it could be integrated into sea walls that are in place primarily for protection thus defraying overall costs for the turbines and the sea wall. Also it could be integrated into ground built offshore wind turbines. It also has the advantage that its moving parts are largely clear of the corrosive effects of salt water and are accessible above water.
@IdeasfortheGreenPlanet3 жыл бұрын
@Giles Pargiter : Thank you for your comment. Yes, you are right. There is the wave power plant in Mutriku/Spain which is built into the wave breaker - which is already there to protect the harbor.
@terrytytula3 жыл бұрын
Been dying to know how the turbine works, thanks.
@IdeasfortheGreenPlanet3 жыл бұрын
@Terry Tytula : 🤔 Looks like this explainer video is not good enough.
@Albrecht80004 жыл бұрын
0:45 I gave you a FAT "thumb UP" for explaining that! :-) I can´t image how it worked. At a normal fan the blades are connected ca. 45°. Greetings from germany
@IdeasfortheGreenPlanet4 жыл бұрын
@Albrecht8000: Thank you SOOOOO much for your kind comment. 👍 This is why we made this movie! Greetings to Germany 😎
@belalcantara23653 жыл бұрын
I like this idea or invention to help our country to make the power consumption be cheaper...
@piotrklepinowski64783 жыл бұрын
Absolutely amazing. I love this concept. Thank you for uploading this video.
@whitenas4 жыл бұрын
This should be implemented everywhere around the world. Talk about solving energy issues.
@whitenas4 жыл бұрын
@Eugene Stoner sorry..where it "Can" be implemented....
@whitenas4 жыл бұрын
@Eugene Stoner personally I like Einstein's idea of a small nuclear power plant in the basement of every home powering everything from heat to your mode of transportation. Unfortunately to dangerous and the waste that it would produce would be a disaster
@unhooked253 жыл бұрын
This is absolutely amazing and it will certainly help to reduce emissions into the atmosphere
@optroncordian78634 жыл бұрын
Better put a float inside the column chamber to actuate the generator either mechanically or hydraulically. It will be more efficient. Later, you may add more floats just outside the chamber to increase the power output. Even more efficient.
@jonathant.boylan14554 жыл бұрын
Wouldn't adding a float slow down the water coming in? And slowing down the water would decrease the velocity of the air passing through the turbine. It would be interesting to see what the trade-off on power would be.
@optroncordian78634 жыл бұрын
My idea is to not use air for moving the generator. The float can move a mechanism directly, or can move a hydraulic pump. Then this mechanism or the hydraulic pressure moves the generator. That way the brief pauses when transitioning between positive and negative pressure are eliminated.
@jonathant.boylan14554 жыл бұрын
Optron Cordian I’m not sure that the amount of work you can get from a float is greater than work from a turbine. Like I said it would be interesting to compare the two.
@optroncordian78634 жыл бұрын
I am curious too...
@Manudyne4 жыл бұрын
So simple yet so genius...
@ArunG2735 жыл бұрын
One video after 10 years. Woah!
@IdeasfortheGreenPlanet4 жыл бұрын
@Arun G : Thank you for your comment. We are not the producer or vendor of this technology. We have been working on this movie for more than 5 months. Nobody paid us for doing it - it is just our small contribution to spread the knowledge about the possible wave energy harvesting.
@nacerben54286 ай бұрын
Thank you very much for this presentation.
@Froggability4 жыл бұрын
I fantasise about these sort of things giving power on the small Pacific islands etc where for many diesel is the only electrical energy source, One only need to visit the blow holes to see the incredible energy available
@IdeasfortheGreenPlanet4 жыл бұрын
@Nathan : Yes Nathan you are right, if the waves are strong enough 🌊
@steveclayton56923 жыл бұрын
The design is novel, in that the shaft always turns in the same direction. In doing so, the acute attack angle, causes the turbine to "stall", and often in need of being electrically started. Suited only for large surf conditions. If it were effective, it would be commonplace. There are better methods, of utilizing the OWC air flow. The video is done well, and clearly explained.
@IdeasfortheGreenPlanet3 жыл бұрын
@ Steve Clayton: Thank you for your comment, sir. At this site in Mutriku Power Plant, the new bi-radial turbine is tested. It is great, that you are working on improvements!
@steveclayton56923 жыл бұрын
@@IdeasfortheGreenPlanet There is nearly a 50% loss of kinetic energy. It will turn only as fast as the air is pushing, and therefore will simply pass through those voids in between the blades. As you enlarge the unit, the voids grow larger, in relationship to the blades surface area. Self defeating. I am surprised at how much personal energy has been devoted to this design. I have a much better turbine design, simple and less expensive to build. Works with low pressures.
@seventyseven.772 жыл бұрын
@@steveclayton5692 do you have a video of your design?
@steveclayton56922 жыл бұрын
@@seventyseven.77 Yes I have several videos, and making new ones. My Patent application is still pending. The video will show it working in a Bi-Directional manner, though will not reveal how it works. I am currently building larger units, to be tested offshore, PacWave (OSU) Oregon USA. Under the same conditions, the Well's Turbine will not spin. It requires a large volume of fast air to operate.
@mohammedkhan53444 жыл бұрын
This is good, but how do you work out how much room is required to generate the ideal amount of wind and what is the ideal size of the turbine. Basically how do you make a very effecient project. I would love to get involved
@IdeasfortheGreenPlanet4 жыл бұрын
@Islam future: Thank you very much for your comment. We are not the producer or vendor for this technology. We made this movie to introduce this technology to a broad audience. We are so happy that this movie inspired you to dig deeper into this concept. Please check out this site: opera-h2020.eu/ Universities from Portugal and Ireland are also involved in this project, so I assume there are possibilities to study.
@m.sierra52584 жыл бұрын
0:53 that's not how wing physics works. Most force gets created by the air that moves around the tip, not the air the hits the underside of the blade. That's a common misconception.
@D_0373 жыл бұрын
That's not a wing tho
@k.chriscaldwell41413 жыл бұрын
Also a misconception is that Bernoulli interactions and the Coandă effect are responsible for generating lift on airfoils. They are not. The pressure differentials generated on and around an airfoil are approximate enough to Bernoulli that Bernoulli's formulas are used in designing aircraft, but Bernoulli forces contribute little to lift generation by way of an airfoil. Airfoils utilize the vacuum generated on their top side to pull down and accelerate it downwards, and in so doing, the opposite reaction is lift: It's Newtonian. Airfoil equipped aircraft are essentially horizontal rockets, but much more efficient. Airfoils are more efficient in sustaining flight because the majority of the energy utilized to maintain lift for airfoil equipped aircraft comes from gravity: 66% to 75%, or more.
@daveadams64214 жыл бұрын
Proving that simple can be better 👍
@Bemx2k4 жыл бұрын
What about salt gathering on it ?
@percival234 жыл бұрын
This is so important to us that we could even bother using a real voice.
@IdeasfortheGreenPlanet4 жыл бұрын
@percival23: Sorry for your inconvenience. This movie is solely for educational purposes. We want to spread awareness for this kind of harvesting wave energy. We are not the producer nor the vendor of this technology or components. We made this movie at our costs. It took us months for its creation, especially water simulation.
@CharlieSolis4 жыл бұрын
Oddly simple... impressive.
@Hector-uu9tb5 жыл бұрын
Que buena idea, gracias a los genios que la concibieron!! 👍🏽👍🏽👍🏽👍🏽
@SunriseLAW3 жыл бұрын
If it can be animated, it can be sold. Seems like a very expensive way to generate fairly small amounts of electricity or we would be seeing them everywhere by now. They built 2 (two) 500 kw plants in Europe at least a decade ago as noted in the vid.
@IdeasfortheGreenPlanet3 жыл бұрын
@SunriseLAW: In the year 2011, the Mutriku (Spain) Breakwater Wave Plant was inaugurated. It is the world's first breakwater wave power plant with a multiple turbine arrangement. The plant has a capacity of 296 kW from 16 turbo generator sets. This technology is evolving. There is a lot of R&D on this site.
@SunriseLAW3 жыл бұрын
@@IdeasfortheGreenPlanet Thank you. I contend that the majority of such projects are essentially scams. The biggest, worst environmental scam is "bio-fuels'... the alcohol in the gasoline. The most expensive scam is the "cap and trade of carbon credits" which OR, WA, CA, and NV got stuck with by their legislatures and causes much higher gas prices. Nothing but an attorney-fee fest. That is all MOST of the "green" initiatives are.
@vladghelu5164 жыл бұрын
Amazing! Very nice 3d renders! Very instructive and inspiring video for helping the world and ourselves. What about a wind power video?
@IdeasfortheGreenPlanet4 жыл бұрын
@Vlad Ghelu: Thank you very much for your kind words. We think that there are already a lot of videos which explain wind power very well.
@charonstyxferryman3 жыл бұрын
Interesting, What if one installed a (modified) device like that on a displacement vessel. It begins with gravity pulling the vessel downwards. While the vessel moving down, air is let into a cylinder that are open to the sea. A wave moves the vessel upwards. The now trapped air makes energy by using a piston with a permanent magnet and a linear motor (alternator) to capture the energy.
@IdeasfortheGreenPlanet3 жыл бұрын
@ Lars Hansen : Thank you for your comment. This sounds like Free floation Oscillating Water Column project: www.researchgate.net/publication/265857026_Challenges_and_lessons_learned_in_the_deployment_of_an_offshore_oscillating_water_column
@MegaJohnwesly3 жыл бұрын
I got the same Idea!!
@MegaJohnwesly3 жыл бұрын
@@IdeasfortheGreenPlanet Thanks for sharing brother^^
@mnut264 жыл бұрын
Seems somewhat inefficient. Changing blade profile and duct each separately. Intake on one side and exhaust on the other side with spring loaded dampers to close them off seems it would allow more efficiency.
@kaingrant58054 жыл бұрын
Go ahead and make it then.
@Assassins66883 жыл бұрын
great video guys, the wells turbine works like magic lol
@AnalystPrime5 жыл бұрын
One thing this presentation is missing is what size are the turbines, both physically and in kilowatts. Estimated price would be nice, but as these are prototype test units their current expenses have no relation to how much a proper wave power plant would eventually cost to build and operate.
@amitabhmishra45953 жыл бұрын
How initial rotation of turbine blade is given please clarify
@IdeasfortheGreenPlanet3 жыл бұрын
@ amitabh mishra : Thank you for your excellent question! The turbine needs the initial spin with an electric motor. In the movie, it is placed on the backside of the turbine.
@809Kocur5 жыл бұрын
Let's say you build the turbines one next to another on the Netherland's sea wall. How much power can you get from 1 kilometer long coast per year? In kWh. And what will be the cost.
@IdeasfortheGreenPlanet5 жыл бұрын
@809Kocur Thank you for your comment. We are not the producer of a wave power plants or Wells turbine. The wave power plant in Mutriku, Spain is built into the breakwater. It is designed for 16 chambers with Wells turbine, 4.5 meters each => approx 80 meters. They are designed to produce 296 kW per hour. But you can't just scale up this data for 1km. It depends also on the energy of the waves in that area. More information: tethys.pnnl.gov/project-sites/mutriku-wave-power-plant
@wijr72114 жыл бұрын
Pretty cool
@ntme94 жыл бұрын
Had the same idea in high school only it involved a giant float and gear.
@zionlehnert30894 жыл бұрын
Same I had the idea in 7th grade I'm in 8th now... I hate it that every time I come up with a genius idea it was already invented 🤦😭
@satishdave2464 жыл бұрын
Fantastic technology .. Powerful energy source for turbines
@gaoglai71275 жыл бұрын
lol, this is just a vertical version of the upload a decade ago
@Merces693 жыл бұрын
if you do taller air towers, it might provide more electricty per square space used?
@ZMSTA3 жыл бұрын
How come this isn't as popular as solar or wind? I mean it's over 2 decades since the 1st facility based on the other video that said something about a plant being operational since November 2000.
@kirayoshikage40573 жыл бұрын
It costs a lot to build, frankly, looks ugly, uses up coast space, and has requirement of being built on a coast. You can plop down billions of panels in deserts, billions of turbines in windy plains, but coast space is way more limited and not every country even has one.
@maksimmuruev4233 жыл бұрын
Its questionable.. effieciency.. againts wind turbine.. actually waves produced by wind.. so if you already have strong wind maybe it more sense to use it in the first place? Project has some limited uses of course.. but nothing more.
@mayanktripathi87264 жыл бұрын
...a series of such turbines all 'insync' on level.uniform shoreline...add solar panels as well maybe a combo will help
@RavageStudio4 жыл бұрын
Didnt knew Rav had the voice for this.
@ilhamidsa64074 жыл бұрын
Everything move can we use to make energy. Right?
@IdeasfortheGreenPlanet4 жыл бұрын
@Illham IDSA: Thank you for your question. Yes, you are right, everything that moves by itself without energy supply from the people could be used for energy generation. Go ahead, just do it!
@muhammadhassam25414 жыл бұрын
In my opinion this is the only practical solution for eco friendly & low cost energy problems
@2xDenn5 жыл бұрын
Wow. There are several wave powerplants in the world. Yet all we see are CGI and photos of the facilities exteriors. No real-life equipment or interiors of the power plants are shown. That all looks suspicious.
@IdeasfortheGreenPlanet4 жыл бұрын
@Denis Mus: You can see the wave energy plant in Mutriku on the Foto in the movie. It is built into the breakwater. This plant is providing households with electricity for years under real conditions. Unfortunately, we don't have copyrights to use the pictures from inside, but you can see the interior and also visit the plant. www.mutriku.eus/en/tourism/mutriku/olatu-planta
@Ryan14124 жыл бұрын
Only downside is that apparently they are very loud, especially with stormy waves.
@IdeasfortheGreenPlanet4 жыл бұрын
@Ryan R: The researchers are working on a novel radial self-rectifying impulse air turbine for use in Wave Energy Converters which has a silent operation and the highest known efficiency amongst air turbines (over 70%).
@Ryan14124 жыл бұрын
@@IdeasfortheGreenPlanet sounds interesting. Have you got a link to a site please?
@aktarurrahman4 жыл бұрын
Fantastic idea 👍
@herzikkimolog2 жыл бұрын
Can I take screenshots from this video with citating in my article?
@IdeasfortheGreenPlanet2 жыл бұрын
Sure, but please cite the source! Thank you
@wijayru4 жыл бұрын
Wunderbar. Awesome 👍
@onefodderunit3 жыл бұрын
Often in the Summer in Southern California there are no waves. Tides remain consistent.
@IdeasfortheGreenPlanet3 жыл бұрын
For harvesting the wave energy, the waves have to possess a lot of kinetic energy, which is not the fact everywhere globally.
@5226-p1e5 жыл бұрын
how do they install something like this? i like the design. but to make it work requires installation which looks difficult.
@IdeasfortheGreenPlanet5 жыл бұрын
I don't know what do you mean "installation looks difficult". The turbine is installed in the house above the hole. It is easily accessible.
@5226-p1e5 жыл бұрын
@@IdeasfortheGreenPlanet I was referring to the construction of the base house. Is it a prebuilt mold or is it built after the installation of this product. I am basically talking about the casing structure around the turbine. Made from concrete I would assume.
@5226-p1e5 жыл бұрын
@@IdeasfortheGreenPlanet As I said, I like the idea of this turbine. It seems very efficient.
@IdeasfortheGreenPlanet5 жыл бұрын
@52262, Thank you for your comment. According to the information we have from the construction of the Mutriku power plant, a concrete foundation was build in the water first. Then they stacked the prebuild mold, as you guessed. The wave power plant is a part of the breakwater. First, they planned the breakwater and then they decided to enhance it wave power plant.
@5226-p1e5 жыл бұрын
@@IdeasfortheGreenPlanet So is there one in use. I mean instead of the animation. Is there a real example of this running.
@andywidiyanto72243 жыл бұрын
Hello, what software do you used?
@IdeasfortheGreenPlanet3 жыл бұрын
@ Andy Widiyanto : Hi Andy, we use Autodesk Maya with Bifröst and Real Flow.
Better make it with polymer.. ocean moisture is hell on most material
@jigold225712 жыл бұрын
Thank You.
@manuelmosquera10384 жыл бұрын
How beautiful..
@БольшаяЛопата4 жыл бұрын
Is that a Blender animation?
@IdeasfortheGreenPlanet4 жыл бұрын
No, this animation was made with Autodesk Maya - Bifrost.
@FEV3695 жыл бұрын
While interesting the numbers given seem top lack context. I looked up the average daily use of a house in the US and it's approx 900 khw, what are these producing per month?
@IdeasfortheGreenPlanet5 жыл бұрын
I assume that you refer to the Mutriku wave power station. The average energy consumption in the European household is approx. 10 kW per day. The Mutriku wave power plant is designed to produce 290 kW per hour with 16 Wells Turbines. This plant is also used as a research plant for other types of turbines. In the 2014-2016 period, only 10 Wells Turbines were producing energy. The average output was approx. 700 kW per day. The researchers are working on improving plant efficiency.
@MrCarlRobinson5 жыл бұрын
I have a fully electric house, the space and water heating uses an air source heat pump. My daily consumption varies seasonally between 12 - 35Kwh per day.
@IdeasfortheGreenPlanet5 жыл бұрын
Mr. Carl Robinson, thank you for your comment. The average energy consumption in the European household is 10 kW per day if the household doesn't use electricity for heating and warm water. Of course, electricity consumption varies upon personal preferences... The consumption of electricity per household in the USA is approx. 32 kW per day, mainly because of space and water heating as well as air-conditioning.
@FEV3695 жыл бұрын
@@IdeasfortheGreenPlanet so about 60 house holds "safely" powered with a bit extra in case. That's pretty good. Wonder what the cost to build is and if the 60 house holds can pay for it.
@dantetriana1485 жыл бұрын
A intermediate pressure storage chamber and continuous discharge to the turbine at a constant speed would be more practical.
@michaeldvorak55564 жыл бұрын
This is a pretty cool how direction of air flow is irrelevant. You could make a more efficient wind generator functional in only one direction but you would need two. Double the price! You would also need something like a diaphragm to select generator based on direction of air flow. Price and complexity go up! Kind of reminds me of the movie Logan's Run where they used generators operated by the tide. With the decades of ocean studies, implementing these generators on a grand scale seems feasible. You probably to eliminate the cost and construction headaches of the concrete chamber by mounting the generator in a PVC tube and mounting the tube vertically.
@musiclibrary8944 жыл бұрын
Is there such an impeller for which direction of airflow is irrelevant?? I mean a single one (uni directional motion for the impeller without any dependence on flow of air )
@Cameron.....4 жыл бұрын
The problem is the turbine takes time to slow down before it can change direction. Changing direction makes it highly inefficient. This system would work better in one direction with a heavy flywheel. Adopt the system used in turbo cars and use an air bypass valve. As the wave draws back and creates a vacuum, the valve can open bypassing the turbine allowing it to continue in the same direction while still generating power, the valve closes again as the wave comes back up pressurising the chamber and driving the turbine further.
@michaeldvorak55564 жыл бұрын
@@musiclibrary894 The impeller they use in their demonstration will rotate the shaft in the same direction no matter which direction the air flows. That's why their design is simple and cost effective.
@michaeldvorak55564 жыл бұрын
@@Cameron..... If your referring to the turbine in their demonstration, it only rotates in one direction. It doesn't matter if the air is flowing up or down the shaft. The continuous rotation in one direction as the air rushes in and gets drawn out of the chamber is possible using their simple/inexpensive impeller design.
@Cameron.....4 жыл бұрын
@@michaeldvorak5556 yeah, could be alternating blades. I though they meant it didn't matter the direction the turbine rotated. A giant flap on the inside of the chamber would be pretty inexpensive and more simple that turbine blades anyway.
@sir_duckington12455 жыл бұрын
Now this is big brain time
@leowulffan4 жыл бұрын
Airflow? Why not water flow? Is it possible?
@SirKolass4 жыл бұрын
Yes, it's called Tidal power
@IdeasfortheGreenPlanet4 жыл бұрын
@leowulffan: The power plants on the rivers also use water flow. They have a different type of turbine, like the Pelton-Turbine or Francis-Turbine. These turbines are much more efficient than Wells-Turbine.
@nishantvashist89514 жыл бұрын
When fins move freely 10 digree up and down....so it can provide more energy.
@pimpalkhute4 жыл бұрын
is electricity generation directly proportional to the speed of the displaced air? i.e.Faster the air more the electricity produced
@binumdply5 жыл бұрын
Why many of our countries don't utilize this properly
@IdeasfortheGreenPlanet4 жыл бұрын
@B M : The wave energy of the oceans is not the same all over the world. The regions around the equator, for example, don't have enough energy to harvest it reasonably with the oscillation water column concept (at least not for now). Search for "ocean wave energy map" on google pictures.
@ja-vg2fh5 жыл бұрын
Why don't they ever mention Portugal. 4 types of swell generators for years.
@ehabnasser60892 жыл бұрын
what is the type of shaft??
@praveendintakurthi74633 жыл бұрын
superb !!
@maheshmahe40807 ай бұрын
How do they tackle the high tide and low tide times? What if the water goes inside the wells turbine chamber? Do they install one way flap to keep the water from entering inside the chamber? If yes, then will the pressure difference is still maintained to keep the turbine in operation? I'm curious Please explain anyone
@IdeasfortheGreenPlanet2 ай бұрын
As you already suggested, there is a flap that can close the opening. This also happens during service. The tide is not the problem; the turbine chamber is much higher than the high tide. An operational wave power plant based on this Oscillating Water Column principle has been working since 2012.
@corgraveland48744 жыл бұрын
Thanks for showing and explanation how it functions! Now it is very clear. Has some strong features. But something is missing yet. Can we get in touch?
@IdeasfortheGreenPlanet4 жыл бұрын
@Cor Graveland: Thank you for your comment. We are not the producer nor the vendor of this technology.
@herzikkimolog2 жыл бұрын
can you introduce some references used in this video?
@IdeasfortheGreenPlanet2 жыл бұрын
This energy harvesting concept is used in the wave power plant in Mutriku, Basque Country in Spain. More informations here: tethys.pnnl.gov/project-sites/mutriku-wave-power-plant
@mohammedkhan53444 жыл бұрын
All these people in the comment don't realize that you could have a continuous line of these on the coast. So it could generate a good amount of electricity
@neilmackinnon91584 жыл бұрын
A continuous line of these along the coast would equate to mass destruction to coastal environments
@mohammedkhan53444 жыл бұрын
@@neilmackinnon9158 using fossil fuels will cause the sea level to rise via global warming, that will mean that the coast will recede. Anyway.
@neilmackinnon91584 жыл бұрын
@@mohammedkhan5344 I'm not disagreeing with that. But the installation of these along the entire coast would destroy some of the most productive and important ecosystems. Installing these systems in place of berms/walls would make sense.
@mohammedkhan53444 жыл бұрын
@@neilmackinnon9158 that's your opinion, it's not proven fact, it could be built to accommodate the ecosystem. They will not build on a coral reef, even if they do, it could be built to house organasims and small fish and plant life. Eg transfer the ecosystem onto the build.
@IdeasfortheGreenPlanet4 жыл бұрын
@Islam future @Neil MacKinnon The oscillating water column principle can also be used on buoys, which are placed offshore. There is a project funded by EU called OPERA H2020. You can watch the movie about the open sea operating experience here: kzbin.info/www/bejne/a2i3Zqylp9Z7ick
@ronfaber64374 жыл бұрын
Volgens mij een verhaal van prutsers. Energie wordt niet in kW uitgedrukt maar in kWh . De opbrengst zal dus wel uit de duim gezogen zijn.
@IdeasfortheGreenPlanet4 жыл бұрын
@Ron Faber: Thank you for your comment. I am sorry that you ignore the fact that the power plant in Mutriku, Spain is built and working.
@JuniorGois-xk6sj4 ай бұрын
Parabéns pelo vídeo
@sueltoeven57445 жыл бұрын
How to make video presentation like this?
@IdeasfortheGreenPlanet5 жыл бұрын
We use Autodesk Maya software.
@davidamoritz5 жыл бұрын
You could use May like they did but to be honest you could even download UT4's engine and build it like a gaming map for free then do a fly through. no need to spend all the money on maya
@aliasif8314 жыл бұрын
Sir why you are not given other videos
@muhammadnuralhafiz5 жыл бұрын
Must try this
@99795120944 жыл бұрын
Why not in india?
@mayanktripathi87264 жыл бұрын
Ditto thoughts
@mayanktripathi87264 жыл бұрын
I guess our manufacturing has not yet understood that there could be retail power plant users...they still believe that they need to cater to small or big business'
@Froggability4 жыл бұрын
It mightnt work that well when it's choked with plastic rubbish
@inventorindoarsitek4 жыл бұрын
nice idea
@rustymason38604 жыл бұрын
Interfering with -- and ultimately stopping -- the earth's waves is a great idea, very green.
@RahulKumar-ve4jm4 жыл бұрын
For that purpose we will have knock off moon first
@robinsss4 жыл бұрын
how can you stop the ocean's waves from moving?
@DSAK553 жыл бұрын
you're a moron
@robinsss3 жыл бұрын
@@DSAK55 who?
@dindings5 жыл бұрын
Does anyone think the canary islands can do this?
@IdeasfortheGreenPlanet4 жыл бұрын
@ Nestor Abreu Jimenez: Thank you for your question. (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave_power#/media/File:World_wave_energy_resource_map.png) According to this map, it should be not enough ocean energy in the region of Canary Islands for harvesting the wave energy with this oscillating water column concept.
@MichaelEricMenk4 жыл бұрын
They tried this design several years ago in Norway, it does not work. It will be blown to kingdom comes when the storms hit.
@MTomas954 жыл бұрын
There are plenty of ways to avoid it for example make an emergency chamber. When working conditions gets to harsh simply direct steam to emergency chamber which does have a turbine. I think I don’t have to example that these processes would be perform automatically.
@abhichau91874 жыл бұрын
It needs initial start so human required not automatic less efficient with 16 turbines supplying only 250 house and useful in coastal areas.
@CUBETechie5 жыл бұрын
Wells Turbine?
@juanestebanvalenciapiedrah64510 ай бұрын
Necesito comunicarme von ustedes de caracter URGENTE
@spartakbekveria12994 жыл бұрын
So simple!
@juliantotriwijaya92085 жыл бұрын
So basically it an air pump, but with water instead of machine.
@Jeevaji145 жыл бұрын
Very good technology
@mrwonders615 жыл бұрын
What do you understad yar......
@oldbatwit51024 жыл бұрын
Oh dear. Someone made a video extolling the Limpet system on Islay without researching what a complete disaster it was. It was a great idea but the designers and engineers were clueless and it was shut down... twice.
@IdeasfortheGreenPlanet4 жыл бұрын
@Oldbatwit: Thank you for you comment. Surprisingly the Basque energy provider (Ente Vasco de la Energía) in Spain/Europe opened the wave power station in 2011 based on the same principle, oscillating water column (OWC). There are 16 chambers with Wells turbines - like in Limpet, just smaller. This technology is under continuous development. Maybe you will find something better - a better technology for harvesting the wave technology or another source of sustainable energy. Just do it, and please don't speak condescendingly.
@oldbatwit51024 жыл бұрын
@@IdeasfortheGreenPlanet It was a great idea but, in the case of Limpet, the designers and engineers were clueless and it was shut down. Maybe you will find something better - a better technology for harvesting the wave technology or another source of sustainable energy. Just do it, and please don't speak condescendingly. And do your research a little more diligently before posting on youtube.
@oldbatwit51024 жыл бұрын
@Sigrun Eide Why don't you actually read the reports on Limpet yourself instead of just having a go at me? Otherwise you add nothing to the conversation. Thanks to google there is a ton of information available, try this for starters then branch out from there.... tethys.pnnl.gov/sites/default/files/publications/Islay_LIMPET_Report.pdf
@TheFusiac3 жыл бұрын
@@oldbatwit5102 you have more info? I'm specially interested in the blade design of the Wells turbine, it needs improvement to be able to start by itself. Studies were done but i have no access to them.
@oldbatwit51023 жыл бұрын
@Heroniden 500w? Do you mean 500Kw? The company that bought Limpet said that they discontinued it because they couldn't get funding, eg. grants, for the under-sea cable to take excess power to the mainland. I really can't see where you got the idea that I ' fail or never even try because I heard it can go bad'. Life must be extra boring for you if you if it consists of attacking people over the internet. Now go bore someone who cares what you think, there's a good boy. Byeeee. xxx
@hoctienganhcungsinhvien3888 Жыл бұрын
This system make a transition from waves energy to electricity energy, right everyone ??
@codeninja107 Жыл бұрын
Wave to mechanical to electrical
@rajivpokharel883 жыл бұрын
hello creator......after almost 11 yrs.
@ismaelforcadabagant9983 Жыл бұрын
All you declare is in theory. Where we could find that "Rotor Blade?
@IdeasfortheGreenPlanet Жыл бұрын
It is not only theory; it is practice. This is a Wells turbine, and it is mounted in the Mutriku wave power station in Spain.
@stonehold424 ай бұрын
@@IdeasfortheGreenPlanetthe wells turbine is not efficient. A vertical axis wind mill works in any wind direction and is very efficient.
@aufaniyukzanali6964 жыл бұрын
How to scale this??
@jbw68234 жыл бұрын
Lots of them?
@Froggability4 жыл бұрын
Lots of Big ones
@HeyU3084 жыл бұрын
Don’t get excited, this is basically a toy, not a viable large scale baseload energy solution.
@f.t.wibowo52604 жыл бұрын
How so? I am a newbie in renewable energy, pls kindly explain. How does it compare with the one designed by SIMEC or minesto?
@Froggability4 жыл бұрын
Faraday first generator was also: just a toy !
@robinsss4 жыл бұрын
many ocean wave have been created and already delivered tons of electricity to homes in Europe they work
@sadukeylife13264 жыл бұрын
Молодцы Британцы
@baladeva37714 жыл бұрын
after watch 10 years video, Voith version, but this more compact.
@windturbinetricksandhacks2224 жыл бұрын
Sir mare pas boht acha idea ha aur me ne kuch wind turbine be bnye han par humara molk bohat pasmanda molk ha mare pas samadr ki lekro energy banane ka bahtreen idea ha
@illuminatiserach65865 жыл бұрын
This construction is wrong, they must change in put and out put air flow, it will make it cheaper and easy to use, no need new tech, it should look like real air pump