Has the New Omega Seamaster 300M Got Rolex Beat? | Watchfinder & Co.

[@watchfinder]

We know you want more watches…. click here: linktr.ee/watchfinder

[@gorgeou8]

Interestingly enough, when one wears a Rolex, people's instant reaction tends to be wondering whether it's real or not. Compared to seeing someone wearing an Omega, people tend to always be impressed. That's based on my personal observation.

[@allan2098]

Are you talking from experience or are you just making this up? I have worn Rolex and Omega watches and never had anyone even mention them, I did have someone comment on how nice my Tag Heuer caliber 5 looked, funny enough..

[@allan2098]

@ochaleklaw Got one already! The old steel chrono which has become a modern classic!

[@allan2098]

@ochaleklaw If timekeeping is a major issue (You need to keep time to the very second) then a radio-controlled watch is the master of that. A Tag Heuer, or a Rolex,, they are, at least in my humble opinion, pieces of jewelry. And they are good at that!!

[@allan2098]

@ochaleklaw Yes, but it's 20th and 21st century mate. They only established themselves in 1905.

[@galatians22122]

Interestingly enough People react to seeing a Rolex and Ignore the Omega. Thats based on my personal observation.

[@OrionVX]

It can't topple the submariner because of the Rolex branding but when you look at it in a design, technology and price point Omega is the real winner.

[@torontowatches9709]

What about the design?- Nasty bezel that can't turn, 14mm thick movement vs 12, pointless HE valve- nasty bracelet or cheap rubber-and James bond gimmicks. "real winner" for sure. The Submariner is the worlds greatest watch, biggest icon ever, everyone agrees on any lists.

[@Shadowedge1000]

@@torontowatches9709 Truth often hurts.

[@torontowatches9709]

@@Shadowedge1000 What truth?

[@rogerstrough3586]

@@torontowatches9709 You clealry never owned a Daytona then. Sub is a nice daily beater, the Daytona is class

[@robertcalton9198]

It's indeed true that "Rolex sells watches - Omega builds watches."

[@ELY3358]

In life, all we need is “one good watch.” The Omega SMP is that watch. Thank you guys, for such a wonderful video.

[@noobzrule]

SMP is only for people who can't afford a Sub 😂😹

[@ninidini6686]

@@noobzrule what a dumpass you ARE :D

[@harry-eto]

@@noobzrule what a differentiated perspective. So, what about those who own both?

[@vigneshkarthikeyan8174]

@@harry-eto i think he means if it were only one. I don’t agree with him cause I like the speedy more but I could see why. Rolex does make good watches at the end of the day!

[@doctoralgy8186]

@@noobzrule Buying a submariner isn't the problem. The Omega SMP is just the better choice XD

[@dylantaylor3431]

I own both the ceramic submariner and the new seamaster white dial with both a rubber strap and steel bracelet. My only issues with the seamaster is that the bezel is slightly more difficult to turn, as the outer edges are smooth and lack good grip, however the tradeoff is the aesthetically pleasing smooth finish. My other issue is the buckle on the rubber strap, it drives me nuts as I take my watch off and on frequently, I would have much preferred a folding clasp. Putting these relatively small issues aside, when I hold these watches one in each hand, it really is hard to pick a favourite. As the gentleman in the video mentioned, the attention to detail and finishing on both watches is immaculate. When it comes down to it, if you're a true connoisseur of watches and quality is what you're looking for, then its a coin-toss. If brand recognition is what you're looking for, then Rolex may be the way to go. I should mention though, in 19 years of wearing Rolexes, I've only ever had 4 people notice and comment on them, so your purchase should really be for your own appreciation, not others.

[@EJ4u]

To hell with Rolex and their insane prices and guarded availability! Omega Seamaster 300m Take it away 🌟

[@acegibson9533]

go back to your Timex.

[@bmjengland4966]

E J Gallo I think you have a valid point!! One of the attractive points to the new SMP is the Price point & of course the availability.. I’ve heard people having to buy Rolexes that they don’t particularly want just to get on the waiting list for the one they DO want.. This puts me off Rolex all together... Omega for me speak to there audience and although still expensive it’s not out of reach! Rolex fan boys will hate no matter what... but when you look at the specs of the new SMP Vs SUB .. there really is room for a healthy debate.. 👍

[@presterjohn71]

@@acegibson9533, he wants to go to an Omega. Why even bring Timex into it? He is not being cheap he is being who he wants to be. No one who dreams of a $4k watch is being cheap, heck you could say the same of the likes of TAG or Longines etc. They are all brands for people with money to spare. Rolex is a choice not the marker of a man.

[@rico200168]

BMJ ENGLAND most or all of my clients wear a Rolex or PATEK PHILIPPE I don’t know why ? Out of curiosity I will ask them this Question !

[@hothmobile100]

You know Rolex sports models used to cost only 1k retail in today’s money, right? So it’s 100% fact that Rolex today is a dirt bag company.

[@tommcdonnell5073]

I just received one for my 50th birthday. Love it

[@benevolentautore4463]

Might do the same!

[@Skibbityboo0580]

I'm getting one for myself for my 40th

[@craigrees7939]

My wife has just green lit one for the big 4-0 🥳

[@Skibbityboo0580]

@@craigrees7939 We should all have a SMP300 birthday party for old farts.

[@noobzrule]

@@Skibbityboo0580 He received one while you are buying one.

[@chepulis]

I did not expect to hear "dastardly castration" in a video on this channel.

[@Pondjumper1]

Stasys Čhepulis Just wonderful!

[@MrRea112]

“Dastardly castration” - something Omega closely avoided when it moved back to in house movements and superior quality

[@phmwu7368]

What happened to Omega ??? Good question!

[@Nicool333]

Glad to see someone else caught that :)

[@geraldbrienza4474]

A Goldfinger reference.

[@cheesecrumpets]

People are going into Rolex AD's in the hopes of getting their hands on a Submariner, but they can't even get on Rolex's long ass waiting list. So what happens next? In so many cases, I've heard of those same people walking straight to their nearest Omega AD's and walking back out 20 minutes later with a brand new Seamaster or Planet Ocean. Rolex are missing out on so many sales that are going to Omega instead, but Rolex don't care. Rolex could expand their manufacturing processes and make more watches per year, but no, that's not their philosophy. They think they're above that. They'd rather keep their supply limited so that their watches remain in the realm of desirability for most and their retail prices remain exaggeratedly high. Rolex are playing the supply and demand game in order to influence the worth of their watches. It's the same game the diamond industry have been using for the last century to keep the price of their diamonds exaggeratedly high. It's greedy, it's immoral and I'm not playing their filthy little game, they can get fucked. I'd rather walk into an Omega boutique with the freedom to choose any model or style I want and be able to walk out with it that very same day, instead of pining for an overpriced Rolex watch that is almost impossible to buy new.

[@dillonkoch72]

You would be a fool to think they are in short supply. They do this to create demand. Patek Philip is exclusive only making 15 watches a year by hand. Rolex comes off an assemble line just like a car.

[@gregbrettharrenpersonal3632]

Omega's are fantastic pieces but at the end of the day, you're walking out wearing a mid-tier Omega. I realize there is a Rolex bubble right now but you're not entirely correct, they're not able to produce as many watches this past year due to covid. Many of their factory workers travel from France that has very strict guidelines. AD's are not getting shipments. Rolex is also heading in the direction of Patek and AP, they're going for the higher end clientele and I don't doubt in the next few years they are going to be Rolex boutiques only and no more AD's. They have all the money in the world and can do as they please. They are looking to appeal to higher end clientele with their finer watches and they are spending more time developing these pieces and it takes something like a year to hand make each Rolex watch. So they really don't care about people buying Omega and they honestly want people looking to spend $5k to buy an Omega. I think they're tired of being the classic watch that every husband gets on his 40th birthday or or if a salesman has a good year. I believe they're looking into the future of their brand and want to a more luxury brand. I personally love the new Omega Seamaster but my wrist is too small for a 42mm case. I currently wear a Rolex Datejust 41 and have a gold Rolex Day-Date 40-both purchased before this pandemic and inflated prices. Just a different perspective that comes from speaking with many AD's and I've been in the watch community for many years so I do know a thing or two about Rolex. At the end of the day, if you wear an Omega, another guy watch enthusiast may notice. You wear a classic Rolex and everyone knows what you're wearing and it is a statement piece if that's what you're going for. I feel proud and it's rewarding every time I wear my Rolex's because I know I worked super hard for them and I feel like a million bucks. Rolex's have have also become a hobby for me, there are so many forums to talk to other owners about current, vintage and new pieces. All in all, Omega is like a Tag-they have stepped up their game with this watch and the new Speedmasters but they're still mid-tier watches like Tag and I don't think they'll ever have the appeal of Rolex. That all being said, you shouldn't buy a watch to impress others, buy what you love. But I feel like you want a Rolex-there are plenty of USA AD brand new Rolex models at MSRP (many stainless sport models are priced crazy high now but look at the Datejust 41) and get the watch you want that you will pass down to your kids and get compliments on everyday. Best of luck, whatever you purchase, wear in good health and happiness.

[@Brian-ee1gx]

It's not that hard to buy Rolex sports watches at AD's, it just takes patience. For me, the wait made the experience all the more special and memorable when I finally did get the call to pick up my new watch. But yes, if you prefer to walk in and walk out with the watch of your choice then Rolex is probably not a brand for you.

[@Brian-ee1gx]

@@noobzrule If it takes years your AD didn't take you seriously enough to put you on the list.

[@Brian-ee1gx]

@@noobzrule You don't have even the slightest idea what you are talking about.

[@mko3530]

Omega just stole my heart with that AMAZING DIAL! Absolutely my favourite design EVER!

[@marcelk3847]

So true

[@batmanarkham5120]

I think that The layout of omega seamaster professional 300m and the planet ocean are better than rolex

[@user-di1hh4qy6r]

Check out the silver grey dial version

[@droneenthusiast5407]

It is absolutely gorgeous. The depth of the dial and the applied markers is just amazing.

[@IANian-ur5ys]

MakS ñn

[@SharapovaFan]

Hands down, Omega really killed it with this dial on the new Seamaster. Punches way above its asking price and it's got an insanely accurate automatic movement to boot.

[@Richard-yy8tn]

If you negotiate hard, you can get a new Seamaster Professional 300M AND Speedmaster Professional Moonwatch for the price of 1 Rolex Submariner steel date.

[@just181]

Do not have to negotiate hard, it already is

[@Richard-yy8tn]

@@just181 in Canada both MSRP for $6200 and a Rolex sub date is $9800. If you can get both Omegas for 20% of at the AD then you can get it equivalent to a sub. But it's hard to get them to give you that much off.

[@InChristJesus87]

@@Richard-yy8tn I had an AD throw a 25% discount at me in a Moonwatch like it was nothing. I need to try and see what they'll offer me on the 300

[@Richard-yy8tn]

@@InChristJesus87 lol that's awesome, try it at a duty free. No tax as well, you'll save at least 35%

[@RickyRicon2023]

@@InChristJesus87 where ? in which city ? or country ?

[@simontravis9828]

I’ve always loved the sea master, and my original quartz will stay with me. The new sea master sits beautifully on my wrist, and being 42mm, looks even better than before. Picking mine up tomorrow 🙂

[@redkop7909]

Just bought this Omega. 4 months on the wrist, beautiful, reliable and very accurate. Omega makes the rules now. Best choice for me.

[@RintTheReaver]

I've been considering getting an Omega.. im torn between the vintage speedmaster moonwatch, the one in the video, and deep black :/

[@sherifehab1]

How much did you buy it for ?

[@redkop7909]

@@sherifehab1 Hi mate, £3950

[@redkop7909]

@Daytona 6263 Are we talking about marketing (retail prices) or better watches? I remember in 1991 you could buy a Rolex Daytona for $300. I don't want to argue with you but I'm sure you understand everything by yourself. After 15-20 years that model of seamaster 300 will be more expencive then submariner on a second hand market. So who make the rules now? But thanks for a comment...

[@henrytheninja1163]

Red Kop I’ll give you $3,800 for it

[@jackserious3282]

I love this new Omega! I bought one and I’m impressed with the quality. And I’m a Rolex guy but I’m honestly tired of the same old boring design of the sub.

[@AdamZitek]

I just went from knowing nothing about watches to being in first 1000 viewers on your videos in six months..... oh boi I am hooked for life ... :D

[@SpencerCookertin]

Same here haha

[@ELY3358]

you couldn’t have picked a better channel! 👍

[@aliindrawan]

Keep your wallet safe :))

[@iaido01]

I don't even know what that means

[@svfutbol20]

Mech watches are the best! Picked up any good ones for yourself?

[@Star_Sn1per]

Id say you have the best camera and lighting out of all the watch reviewers.. Really good.

[@0ioiuibgfg]

polarized filter and 4 ambient lights i suppose.

[@박카일의워해머채널]

It really is such eye candy

[@john-carlosynostroza]

True but he only does one shot so it's not that hard. Just get the formula right and you are done forever. Pretty smart though if you ask me. Does look great.

[@noobzrule]

He has the best hands in the 🇺🇸

[@edmiera3583]

I've had the privilege of owning and wearing both the Rolex two tone Submariner and the Omega Seamaster Automatic both on bracelets I wore them daily and the one I regret selling the most was the Omega Seamaster the Rolex was more of a status symbol in my opinion the Omega wore better and kept better time my Rolex seemed to need more adjusting I also had a datejust and the same thing with it the only thing I had with my Omega was getting extra links for the bracelet of the two watches I'll buy an Omega Seamaster Automatic before I buy a Rolex Submariner. have a great day

[@jasont4783]

It was nice to call my local AD this weekend and ask them if they had the white dial seamaster available. The answer was they had all three color options. When was the last time you called a Rolex AD asking about a steel anything and finding it was available. Thank you Omega for making your watches available. I plan on wearing and enjoying my new seamaster "great white" for years to come.

[@LincolnSixAlpha]

I've always had a fondness towards Omega, purchasing the "GoldenEye" 300 Diver back in the mid-'90s. It's still with me, working beautifully!

[@512bb]

I am a Rolex guy, that said Omega did a beautiful job with the new Seamaster & I would be very proud to wear it. I believe Omega is the equal in quality to Rolex in every respect. I think Omega's only issue is too many so called limited editions, product variations which ultimately is a branding issue. The simple magical success of Rolex is just slow & steady evolution of a long product line, lets face it at 30 feet a Submariner of the 60s looks like a Submariner of today, its all about the details. Nothing crazy just traditional classic historical styling & of coarse complete control of availability. Everyone one wants what they have a hard time finding. The new Seamaster is a real bargain by any standard.

[@eastbaystreet1242]

One of the most on-target comments, Scott. And my first Swiss was Omega, so I care for the brand. Furrther to your point I wonder how much of perception/success is the playing out of the marketing cycle: following greater success (revenue) Omega buys branding in the places we see Rolex (big golf and tennis events, etc) and perception changes.

[@512bb]

Wahl Larry - Thank you for your kind words, I agree with your thoughts. Perception becomes reality even if the facts don't support it. Rolex & Patek Philippe just always seem to make all the right business decisions that keep them at the top even though there are so many incredible watch brands available. I kind of have a love / hate relationship with Rolex as they make it so hard for even their loyal long time customers the ability to buy many in demand models that command such premiums on the secondary market, that's the real conundrum. I will tell you if I had hit that 1.5 billion dollar lottery I probably would have never worried about value retention ever again so probably wouldn't be heartbroken if I never bought another Rolex. Two examples from Omega that I would take in a heartbeat over the Rolex Deepsea or Daytona would be the Ploprof 1200 & the Speedmaster Moonphase Aventurine dial, those watches are simply amazing but for what ever reason just don't retain the value, none the less one day I will find a way to break the Rolex habit & add those beauties to my collection, I just hope I do it before everyone else figures it out, all the best Larry!

[@jmc9180]

Totally agree with you

[@512bb]

@@jmc9180 Thank you.

[@ripperx444]

I have owned them all. I use Rolex as a commodity to fund other pieces. Well at least I used to when you can get a sub pre owned for $6800-7000. Now it’s just hilarious with the prices and the fake wait lists. A submariner is not watch that deserves a waiting list especially with a new seamaster being sold at half the price new! I got a great deal on my blue seamaster and I love it. It’s a daily beater that’s also accurate as ever!

[@erikkalifornia5182]

I have both, and I would say I wear the Omega more often. Rolex sub was my grail watch, and the wife gave it to me for xmas. It is a beauty. There is just something about the omega that gives it the most wrist time. Partly because I tend to baby the Rolex a bit more, and the Omega just feels more robust, and more like an everyday beater. Love them both, but the details in the Omega are better, IMHO.

[@manuel_tp]

More than 3 years later, this watch hasn’t left my wrist ever since I bought it. I’m still in love since the first day. Still running dead accurate.

[@manuel_tp]

@N A Hi! Didn’t see your reply. Mine is pretty much the same, some days y +0, other days +4. I adjust it once in a month, when I do it, it’s about 1.5-2 minutes ahead.

[@manuel_tp]

@N A actually the scratches are in the AR coating, not on the crystal. My entire watch is full of scratches hahaha, used and abused. I don’t baby watches.

[@manuel_tp]

@N A by the way, I just measured the time keeping. After 18 days is running 53 seconds fast. To me that’s great heh, about 2.9 seconds fast a day 😃

[@ID-Guy]

But, 90’s Omega 300’s had bracelets and milled clasps that made Rolex's tuna cans and hollow links look shameful ;) The new 300's are unreal. Their movements are leagues ahead, their redesign is fresh and that centre date window just finishes it off perfectly. I reckon they have set a new standard.

[@bighands69]

Stop kidding yourself.

[@ID-Guy]

Ouch.

[@patrickdaly5988]

I quite like it, especially the two tone (which I normally hate) but that bracelet still looks like it came from the 90s.

[@LKJDFDG]

The Rolex movement is so much better, than the crappy ETA 2892

[@theprepperrevelator]

AW except Omega doesn’t use that crappy movement in this watch or didn’t you watch the video. Rick

[@markclark9586]

I've had a Rolex Submariner and I currently wear an Omega Seamaster 300 (2018) as my daily watch. Omega is a better watch, more interesting to look at, and I used the money I saved to buy and Omega Speedmaster Moon Watch for dressier occasions. Get the Omega you won't be sorry.

[@marshalbass7098]

This is what I'm currently contemplating. Sell the sub and get a sea and speed master.

[@michaelzuccardo5414]

Personally, I think it's a no brainier, I'd take the Omega 300m over the Rolex Sub in a heart beat! Much better bang for buck, superb looking, iconic timepiece with excellent upgrades. Also, I've never cared much for the cyclops date window, which I thing is an ugly bump on the crystal face...like a wart.

[@MichaelMacco]

Michael Zuccardo same. Although I recently learned that you can remove those.

[@PointNemo9]

There is a Submariner no-date

[@zekevfab]

Rolex Sea Dweller does not have the magnifying glass... but it is much more expensive

[@lukejones7366]

Not to mention everyone and their grandma has one.. Less of a status symbol and more of a declaration : check me out I'm basic AF

[@bluelabel222]

Here I am looking into a sea master after waking out of a Rolex dealer when I can't even get on to the waiting list 😂.

[@k0d0kan]

Don't wast your time. The 116610 is a TANK and you may not like it. I have a 16610 and a 116610, I love the 16610 but am selling the 116610 because of its bulk. I was hoping I would get used to it but no... I also own Omega Seamaster 300 Grey Dial / Blue Bezel on Bracelet and it's the nicest watch in my collection.

[@muffemod]

I've owned many watches from both Rolex and Omega. It's not a versus battle in my opinion. Just differences.

[@noobzrule]

Do you still own them?

[@muffemod]

@@noobzrule Some of them yes.

[@facetiousmonkey5322]

If an Omega Seamaster Professional is good enough for the future king of England, it's good enough for us peasants.

[@hathaway.1166]

That Omega was one of the best thing Diana ever gave to his son😭

[@todzzzzz]

I love waiting for the hand actors right hand to move to make a point when showing a new watch on this channel. So classy!

[@MrKikopr]

Absolutely love the Omega. As the name implies.. it ends here.

[@Josh-jp3ft]

I really love that red Seamaster text! It looks lovely. :)

[@seekelnasr]

The White 300m SMP is a league of its own. Unbeatable

[@AngloFPSs]

Totally agree with the assessment at the end. I've tried so hard for years to agree with the design of the SMP but could never quite reach the point where I'd want to one day drop the money on one. That has absolutely changed with this refresh and has destroyed any personal aspirations of a Submariner when you line them up next to each other. So many people complain about the He escape valve, which is of course subjective, but I think its sized brilliantly and the conical shape looks fantastic and mutes the size a bit. The enamel wave dial is out of this world and the finishing on the lugs should be the envy of most watches North of £5, 000. Absolute stunner, Omega have knocked it out of the park and onto the moon (again)

[@waiming1223]

I have a Rolex Submariner and Omega Planet Ocean 600M with 8900 movement. Still like this beautify Seamaster 300M. For the bezel, Omega's liquid metal is a lot nicer than Rolex's. For the dial, the Zirconium dial is such a superb material that is looking great but also a stable material without the risk of color fading. From my personal daily use of Rolex Submariner and Omega Planet Ocean 600M, I am so surprised to see Omega is so much more accurate than Rolex. My Omega's accuracy is up to +1 second in 3 months, where as for my Rolex it's off by at least 15 seconds per month. For look and feel, I love both Rolex and Omega, but love Omega a bit more for it's transparent case back. For daily usage, I love a lot more Omega's spot-on accuracy. The new Master Chronometer movements from Omega is probably Rolex needs to catch up.

[@ES-tr5no]

Jack Cheung why would you be surprise, Omega had always made a more accurate time piece than Rolex.

[@manishdalamal9007]

Hi Jack! Are you sure about the omega planet ocean having an accuracy of +1second in 3 months .that is insane! can you share a pic of your watch/model no. and the price you paid please. I must get this watch

[@thebikerkid6]

I think it's very nice and on level whit the submariner, and not so boring

[@brianjones7784]

Everytime I click on a Watchfinder video: "I just wanna take a look at the watch real quick." 8 mins later: "IT'S OVER?! WTF MAN!!"

[@martinjn2920]

I would love a Rolex watch but it seems crazy that I should have to pay out nearly double the cost of the Omega just to have a watch that is better at.......? Yes the Rolex will hold its value but only if you can actually get hold of one, waiting lists appear to be lengthening to the point that you will have forgotten what you ordered, unless of course you are willing to pay 50% extra and buy via the grey market. Whereas your Omega will be available, on your wrist, getting admiring glances and telling the time, all while you have that look of satisfaction having bought a great watch at a great price. So buy the Omega on a bracelet, get a few spare straps so that you can mix thing things up, go on a nice city break with your partner and still have some money in the bank in the bank.

[@shipmate3577]

I've been on two waiting lists for over a year for a no-date Sub. I'm tempted to buy my second Seamaster (a blue one since I own the 2012-1017 black dial model).

[@ricchrono5907]

I am considering to trade my sea dweller into this seamaster and el primero 21, probably gotta fork a bit extra, but it sounds more fun.

[@shipmate3577]

@@ricchrono5907 NO!!! Don't get rid of any Rolex, unless you are trading it for a better Rolex. Just save and buy the Seamaster and El Primero used.

[@ricchrono5907]

@@shipmate3577hey there mate, from the sort of investment point of view, I can see where you are coming from. I m thinking of doing that simply cos I think the other two are far better watches. even on the money side, I think rolex craziness is reaching its peak. with the price tag now it's no longer an affordable luxury. I think the pendulum is approaching a point of swinging the other way soon.

[@dragonmaster7841]

It’s available cause no one wants it

[@silverlakeas]

Historically Omega is one of the greatest Swiss watchmakers & Olympic Games timekeepers.

[@sharker1935]

The benefit of the helium valve benefit underwater is when you give your old version Seamaster to your son as an heirloom and he forgets and leaves the valve open and then goes diving... Thereby ruining the watch with salt water! I have some experience in the issue :(

[@elijahschnake3863]

F

[@Solaar_Punk]

Good to hear it had a life though

[@sharker1935]

@@Solaar_Punk I have since fixed her. She lives again!

[@tanwera]

I have a 9900 PO chronograph and love it. I've been diving for 35 years and would never dive with it, not because I think it couldn't handle it, but because I would be afraid of losing it. Lets face it, the HEV is useless. No professional diver would use it when they could use a $300 dive computer instead. But that's not the point. We marvel in the craftsmanship of these watches. Otherwise, we would be all be wearing Casio G-Shocks, much more accurate and practical watches. I don't notice the HEV, will never need to use it even while diving, but like the idea that someone designed it for a purpose and that it it's there. I'm married but don't wear a ring. I certainly would never wear a necklace or bracelet. Lets face it, mechanical watches are jewelry for men, pure luxury, and are otherwise useless except for the fact that they are a reminder of a time when this type of craftsmanship was a marvel. As of yet, no one has ever commented on my watch; it's usually under my shirt sleeve. But I know it's there...oh, and it also tells me the time. Good enough for me.

[@tyysiu]

Just bought this Omega SMP 300 yesterday. I owned Rolex DJ41 but would like to have a watch with more sporty look. Was trying to get GMT II with no luck at all and then Omega came to my mind and I am not disappointed. Its coaxial movement, anti-magnetism (15 times better than Milguass), METAS certification, micro-adjustment clasp, see-through case back, adding back wave design on the ceramic dial and it is only at less than 1/3 the price of a new submariner (not listed price I am talking about). The packaging is also very nice. One can go to Omega website to check the test results of the watch bought. I think it is good value for money.

[@Thomasc1004]

Just switched from the Submariner....love this Omega...

[@FirestormAA]

Just purchased one blue dial 300m...... is a stunner with attention to tons of details. Placing it beside a Rolex really make Rolex look rather dull & dated. I go go the build & reasonably price timepieces rather than bigger brand equity & crazy hype. Great video WF!

[@turbofan67]

I've had my Seamaster 300m for 15 years and can't think of another watch that I'd prefer over it. Just looking online yesterday, surprised to find the model I have cost more second hand than I paid for mine new.

[@theberndeath]

I was looking for this watch 1 week ago, definitely buying this one

[@collinruth4756]

Sadly, I don't think the SM 300M will "topple" the Submariner purely because too many people are so engrained with bias towards Rolex and the Submariner itself. Yes. there is absolutely no doubt in anyone's mind that Rolex makes truly fantastic watches, but they're almost too common. More in the sense of that they're always the first thing that people lean towards when they think of buying luxury watches. The Omega is different stylistically, more interesting to look at, and much less copied. It has a different shape and feel overall, and in honesty the quality difference is almost non-important because at that price you're generally getting a great watch no matter what. In my opinion the Omega is the winner, but of course I'm also subjected to bias.

[@bighands69]

Many people that own a Rolex probably have more than one of them. They are a dress watch, true active sports watch and are reasonably priced considering what they offer. The Seamaster is only one waterproof watch in the whole line up of Omega. Every Rolex has a screw down crown (baring Cellini). Rolex are both a dressy watch and a rugged watch all in one. Even the top end Day Date in complete gold can be taken diving or to the board room.

[@462410doctor]

@@bighands69 You really need to have a closer look at Omega's catalogue if that is what you're thinking ;)

[@diavalus]

@@bighands69 Rolex is not a dress watch, you have no clue what a dress watch is.

[@bighands69]

@@diavalus Yes it is a dress watch. It can be worn with a lounge or business suit.

[@diavalus]

@@bighands69 even an Apple watch can be worn with a business suit, but that doesn’t mean it’s a dress watch. As for Rolex, most of them are called “sport watches” for a good reason. You can wear them with a suit, but if you want to look like a clown, that’s another story.

[@jamescollett2625]

Hi please can someone help me. Is it possible to attach the old seamster bracelet(THE BOND BRACELET) to the this new 2018 seamaster?

[@MrRoger13th]

Tried it on last weekend. As an owner of a Speedmaster the Seamaster is a beautiful watch. And compared fo the speedmaster much better machined. I was suprised how well made it is. Even compared to a rolex sub or gmt master its superior. Maybe my next watch :)

[@matthewlemon]

It's a beautiful watch, I have a 2000 version that was bought by my wife for me so I guess I'm biased towards the Omega but it is stunning.

[@TheNidhinpkoshy]

7:10 A knife to a gun fight..! You are amazing with your words, the way of narration is so seductive..!

[@lcm6091]

We watch enthusiasts talk about brand, quality, fit, finish, accuracy and so on but availability is necessary. I have wanted a Rolex Sub for years but couldn’t justify paying above retail for a pre owned. So I looked at the new Omega Seamaster blue dial w/ blue rubber strap. Well, I took it home. The whole Rolex shortage has made me look at other brands with equal or better quality. Actually I have added ( in my opinion) some great watches to my collection that I my not have considered. Thanks, Omega for quality timepieces!

[@jpatrickdowns]

Are you still happy with the blue dial and bezel? That was my first choice, but now I am thinking of the white face. I also love the new Nekton model with titanium bezel and raised numbers lasered in relief (but I worry it may scratch and may not be the best choice for daily wear, vs the ceramic bezel). Thx.

[@lcm6091]

@@jpatrickdowns Patrick, I am very pleased with the blue/blue Omega Seamaster. Must say if you are looking for an every day wearer I would go Omega (quality) .... white with the bracelet. Much more versatile and just as good looking. My opinion!!!

[@swampThaang]

Old versions of the Seamaster have a bezel that is notoriously difficult to rotate. Did they fix that?

[@Cobra83.]

I personally love omega as everyone has a Rolex. Its starting to become THAT brand. U know the one.

[@RyanChoob]

7:05 shame the new model doesn't have the applied logo in white gold or silver like the older ceramic to the left or the original to the right rather than painted on the dial.. that 'gleam' from the applied logo feels to me to set it off as a more premium piece. But then, maybe that would make it look too 'busy' with the 'waves' being more obvious and deep than on the original where they're more subtle, and the hands and hour markers being bolder...

[@joannebarry2766]

After months searching for a submariner,i gave up and went to buy this omega in blue,and guess what apparently they are flying off the shelves and sell out as soon as they arrive.I am now on a waiting list.The store had a blue one reserved for another buyer but i was allowed to try it on and it is stunning.Much better in the flesh,and the quality is staggering.Hopefully the wait won't be too long.

[@mrbud8524]

Am the same. All the dealers in Scotland the seamaster is sold out am on the list am waiting for the blue dail can't wait to get it.

[@ScottLewis123]

Scotland does seem to be getting a bad deal on this. I pre ordered one while visiting family in Manchester and got it earlier than expected. I later went into my local AD in Aberdeen, and they hadn't had any, their delivery was 4 weeks late at that point. When they spied mine under my cuff I was politely questioned where I got it from - hahaha.

[@MoonsingerMedia]

I was introduced to Omega because of Goldeneye .. and then I finally bought one .. a 2531.80 Seamaster Pro in 2001. I did try on a Rolex at the same time but what struck med was that the omega felt AMAZING on my wrist .. the Rolex was very underwhelming .. it felt fake. The Omega is the clear winner. And I have never stopped loving my Seamaster. I would love to buy a newer one at some point, but the ‘Bond’ model .. is perfection in my eyes. A delightful watch with an exquisite bracelet that speaks of quality and looks super elegant no matter where you wear it.

[@kennynunez6792]

The new Omega 300 is a beauty and can at least be purchased at your local AD; the same cannot be said about a basic Submariner, there are no stainless steel watches to be had, not in my neck of woods anyways (Southern CA). Any Omega purchased, unless a very special limited edition will drop in price, for a collector that may not be an issue, but for the lay person shelling out $4-$5K Americano dollars it can be a bit disconcerting. Rolex as everyone should know is an over inflated pig in price and name, but they sell, make nice margins and protect their brand very ingenuously. I hope to one day have this over inflated pig.

[@batmanarkham5120]

But not everyone buys a watch while keeping investment or resale value in mind

[@unrelatedpopcornfire9823]

Omega keeps innovating and thats why their watches dont hold value.

[@eastbaystreet1242]

Amen. I watch one of the FB pages about Omega and have actually had a guy make fun of my small collection of Omegas. But my rental houses pay me good money every month and build savings for me, my family, and assets that I can pass on to my kids. I am all about being an enthusiast. I like several toys: cameras, boats, watches. But life is all about balance. Which, in my mind, further supports the value prop for Omega. Extremely well made and far less expensive than many of the alternatives. (sorry, this was supposed to be a response to vrbas Jimmy Page's comment).

[@bigchiponmyshoulder7573]

That Sir is the perfect response and one that mirrors my own situation. Financial prudence and common sense wins every time in my book. I'll probably get this watch and would definitely have it over the Roller. However, I'll get it a couple of years down the line in spanking condition and at (hopefully) a hefty discount. ATB, Big Chip

[@luispadilla2212]

@@vitaboost Really? Where is your AD. Am ready to pull the trigger. Am in California and they won't.

[@markclark9586]

I just got my Omega Seamaster 300M with white dial the other day. It is by far and away the best watch I have ever owned. I have lusted after Rolexes for decades. Now that I am old enough and wealthy enough for a Rolex, I prefer the Omegas.

[@jannovotny9630]

Hopefully I'll be getting mine by the end of this week. Can't wait:-)

[@BarnOwl61]

Thanks for the review. As much as i admire Rolex as a brand, i would prefer the new Omega. First of all, Rolex won't sell me one! Second, the Omega has (in my modest opinion) a more modern movement. And after all that, is affordable, if you are not dealing in oil on the international market! Yes, the Omega is the winner here.

[@prasmvssen]

Just got my hands on one of these, and it is absolutely stunning! One of its best features is, without a doubt, the crisp sound when turning the bezel! Love your reviews, btw. Keep it up

[@Sniipez-]

Congrats on your beautiful watch 😀 I know it's been a while. How do you feel about it after 3 years, do you still recommend it?

[@WMH98296]

I've never owned a Rolex, but have been an avid Omega fan since the mid-1980s. My collection currently includes a Manhattan Constellation (my first Omega), a 50th Anniversary Seamaster GMT, a gold-and-stainless Seamaster 300 Chronograph, a quartz Seamaster 300, a mechanical Seamaster 300 Chronograph, a 45mm Seamaster Planet Ocean Date, and a 45mm Seamaster Planet Ocean Chronograph. My favorite among these tends to vary, but recently I've tended to favor the 45mm Planet Ocean Date model. I tend to baby my watches, using a "disposable" plastic watch whenever I do chores around the house, so they're all still like new. I plan to someday pass them on to my sons, assuming they want them.

[@MarkSmith-tg7qp]

What a fantastic watch Well done Omega. I have a 2003 SMP which was always served me very well Very tempted to get one of these now tbh

[@markrobertson5506]

I picked up a blue stainless steel 300M last November and absolutely love it. I’m also surprised how many comments I get. It is a sophisticated timepiece with an interesting, masculine design. Congrats Omega! However I’m still a huge fan of Rolex, love the simplicity of the Datejust 41. Thanks for a brilliant review, the best I’ve seen 👍🏻

[@MrOvenables]

I have this watch and can confirm it’s beautiful.

[@noobzrule]

The quartz ref one 😹

[@SimulatorWhiz]

@@noobzrule They don't make quartz seamasters anymore

[@noobzrule]

@@SimulatorWhiz 😂 how much u wanna bet? Not everyone wear manual wind 🤣

[@SimulatorWhiz]

@@noobzrule I don't understand what you're saying

[@ajhimage8151]

@@noobzrule what are you talking about? Seamaster 300m (This watch) is automatic ie not quartz, not manual wind; are you confusing it with the Speedmaster Professional Moonwatch? If you know nothing about watches then don't makes stupid-ass comments

[@wozmac771]

Omega Professional has been chronometer certified since the 90s. Please correct me if I am wrong. Had bought the 2002 model, Automatic, it mentioned it was chronometer certified. After watching your videos and learning about the Rolex quality a while back, started respecting the watch and company. But, I will say, Rolex has been the best in brand recognition as you have mentioned a few times. Hans had a fantastic strategy and it did pay off just like iPad or iPod or iMac.

[@5thcrx]

I'm not going to lie, that is one good looking Omega Seamaster.

[@CleanClaspCollector]

Just got mine in Blue. Gorgeous. Looks incredible in person. Super happy!!!!

[@mohnnadmercedes8246]

I don’t know what all fuss about In-house movements!!! The ETA with upgrades and chronometer level movements are much tougher

[@bighands69]

+Mohnnad Mercedes It is not just that movement is in house the whole watch is in house. What this means is that Rolex can keep the quality exactly has they desire. Rolex even have a steel foundry for their metals. And when you add to the fact that all Rolex watches have screw down crowns and can be taken for a dive it means there is a lot of bang per buck in the watch. Seamaster is still a very nice watch.

[@highnrising]

Every dive watch has a screw-down crown.

[@NaNa-wj8tw]

Nothing wrong with it if it’s reflected that the price is a grand. Why should I be paying more for shipping in a $200 ETA movement? That’s the point. What excuse are they going to use? Significant R&D LOL. See Cartier for an example. Complete piss take.

[@kokibalboa9527]

same thing with Rolex , " I don't know what all that fuss about in-house movement " , Rolex could use ETA with upgrades ...

[@itsallrobbish]

bighands69 I’ll agree with most of what you say, but bang for buck it does not have.

[@Coolbill34]

Had an opportunity to compare my midsize 90s Seamaster to the now previous generation and the brand new Seamaster 300. They really have come a long way, even with some odd color combos. The blue dial with two tone case and blue rubber strap was just stunning

[@robertsullivan4773]

I just bought the 2017 300m and I couldn't be happier. I have a thin wrist so the 41 verses the 42 actually made a difference. I guess by point here is I thought the 2817 had caught the Sub. I'm not a movement snob the highly modified 2892-a2 is a fine motor for my beautiful Blue Dial Seamaster and I love my Hippocampus on my case back. I already have three watches with display backs, they are nice but a bit overrated.

[@jaronefarrell3047]

I’m interested in 2 watches the 2022 breitling super ocean or the omega Seamaster what the best option

[@dancognoscenti8527]

"It’s no secret that Omega has been chasing Rolex’s success for near on half a century." ??? Really..... ....first watch on the moon , for me the chase ended there.

[@rosshilton]

The problem is it wasn’t the same Omega that put a watch on the moon that you buy today. These days it’s Swatch with an omega label stuck on it. The moonshot days are long gone.

[@rawhides]

@@rosshilton lol, the Speedmaster 861 is still the only watch that is qualified for EVA by NASA. It was used extensively in the early days of the Shuttle program.

[@rosshilton]

John Zupancic the shuttle program ended decades ago mate. More than half the worlds population were not alive for the last moonshot, and around 15% believe it was faked.

[@rawhides]

@@rosshilton Cool, so not only are you wrong about when the Shuttle program ended (Last STS mission was in 2011), you're bringing a conspiracy theory to support your argument. The percentage of people who think the moon landing was fake has nothing to do with the Speedmaster being an iconic watch; also, all you have to do is look how much the prices have increased on special edition Speedmasters (like the Silver Snoopy) to see how there is still immense interest in the moon landings. Lastly, the whole "Speedy Tuesday" phenomenon has taking off like a wild fire.

[@rosshilton]

John Zupancic my apologies John, you are correct and I was wrong about the last shuttle flight. It seems like far longer ago. I was being tongue in cheek regarding the conspiracy theory.

[@howardrathbone2120]

Why is there a Pentax MX camera in the video, it was an awesome fully manual and fully mechanical camera and one of the smallest slr cameras of the time.

[@Numb3r_47]

This is the best review I've seen on the new Seamaster. It looks amazing under that light and I just keep finding myself watching it.

[@some12see]

anyway, just curious, is the new omega seamaster bezel have some fraction of a mm "play" on the bezel? its like the bezel have a bit of give movement...really tiny side to side movement..is it normal? its like tiny bit loose but i know its not actually loose...and have small metallic sound when you tap the bezel...some people said that's not flaw as long as there is perfect alignment, but i don't know, what do you think? i was quite panic when i first received the watch. I used to owned breitling avenger chrono 43 mm and i feel breitling bezel is rock solid and a bit stiff to turn (well sometimes too stiff to turn).

[@titojose1559]

Omega railmaster vs rolex explorer 1, pls

[@davidofglenbrook4487]

Jc Joble Or, is it Railmaster vs Milgauss?

[@Dilldog1]

I like this compare idea

[@titojose1559]

@@davidofglenbrook4487 i dont like the aesthetic of milgauss, sorry brother.

[@georgejpg]

I called the Milgauss ugly on the watches subreddit and got downvoted hard. Dunno why people like them so much, so forgettable IMO

[@terr256]

Railmaster all dayy

[@sanketss84]

I just saw the omega seamaster in person yesterday and I was spellbound, the finish is just just top notch. the waves dial is something neither a video nor any picture cant reproduce you have to see what a beauty it is with your actual eyes. words cant describe more of it. its one thing I would like to own for sure.

[@skunkeyebandit]

black or white dial

[@sanketss84]

@@skunkeyebandit black

[@MrBulletpoint]

Please do a review comparing it vs. the 2017 model

[@davidmeier8860]

Great suggestion

[@Inkahustler]

2018

[@eastcoastautobahn2479]

did you change mic's during this? lacks its usual "presence"... thanks for the great review

[@victorthangdo3303]

Great review! I own one now and love every detail of it every day.

[@barrelvisor]

Still the best review of the the SMP out there. Thanks!

[@droneenthusiast5407]

I'm over the moon with my 2018 SMP. It is my first luxury piece, but I fee like it brings enough to the table in comparison to the Submariner with the new movement and redesigned dial. Couple the price and if Omega makes them accessible enough then I think it will be a winner for those Submariner shoppers that can't find one.

[@Thatguy-zh1ln]

I have a 2013 seamaster that I purchased from watchfinder, sold a yacht master to purchase it. Never looked back

[@ssvs0485]

Those waves oh those waves! I am truly in love!

[@adbraham]

I love the “old school desk” backdrop of these vids! 😀

[@motorcarclassics2922]

"If you want a Rolex, you want a Rolex" - Wiser words have never been said.

[@branchclan6112]

A lot of relevant comments in this thread. Keeping the theme here Omega SMP vs. Rolex Sub... I haven't had the pleasure of owning a Rolex Sub. I bought a new Omega Seamaster Pro 300M Chronograph last month. Leaving price out of this for now, I have to say that there are distinct areas, in my opinion, where one is clearly "better" than the other - and vice versa. At the end of the day, one model has essentially stayed constant - and the other has innovated over time. Both strategies have their advantages. So why the gap in demand and price? I'm interested to hear some perspectives, but I tend to think that marketing investment has to be the key factor. Perhaps quality to a much lesser degree, but primarily marketing. According to some, Rolex is the most recognizable luxury watch brand in the world (100%). Who comes in 2nd at 70% recognition? Omega. Yes, Omega is the official timekeeper for the Olympics. One event every 2-4 years. Clearly, 007 rocking Omega models caused a massive surge in brand recognition - and revived a sinking ship. Rolex, on the other hand, captured official timekeeping for USTA (Pro tennis) and the professional golf tour (PGA). Both being global sports with countless events throughout a one year cycle. If the assertion by some here is that Omega should be considered as or more prestigious that Rolex; Omega must invest the marketing dollars and land grab some serious professional sports timekeeping. Rory McIlroy and Sergio Garcia are official ambassadors for Omega. With this, if I were Omega - I would try to grab the PGA at almost any cost. Personally, I am elated that I was able to purchase my Omega for $6500; out the door - during a time when one can't get a new or like new Submariner for less than ~$14,000. Then again, I buy watches because I find them beautiful... not in hopes that I'll get a return on the investment or impress someone. There's no doubt that a Rolex is a beautiful timepiece with amazing quality. BUT - after a month of wearing the Omega Seamaster 300 Chrono - there are three changes I would make to consider it the BEST DIVER on the planet. 1) Coin edge the bezel as opposed to scalloped. 2) Flush the helium escape valve with the case 3) Replace the ceramic chrono pushers with steel screw-down pushers

[@TheRunningManZ]

They just need to ditch the escape valve. 99/100 aren’t being used for diving but a valve stuck on it that looks like a tacked on old style tooth paste cap isn’t helping the aesthetic at all. The metal strap which will of course be the most popular is a real marmite design too. To some it’s iconic, to just as many, it’s stuck in the 90s. The finish of the case itself aside from the valve is stunningly good though.

[@TheRunningManZ]

Dr James Crabapple. So is the submariner which everyone seems to compare this too but it doesn’t have that valve. There are plenty of 300m watches of all prices that don’t have the valve I believe mate.

[@TheRunningManZ]

Im not saying they are, however Omega are far from cheap either are they? My comparision with the sub was just the natural one because everyone is making it, it even mentions Rolex in the title. I could easily have said Seiko too. You can call them diving tools mate, but the reallity is that 99/100 of these sold are going nowhere close to any scuba gear and we both know that. Of those 1 in 100 that do get used for diving, how many do you reckon will ever see a decompression chamber? Come on man, its a stupid gimmic tapped on the side to imply a rugged diver watch while (for me personally) spoiling the aesthetic of a very nicely made watch. Omega make high quality luxury watches, I like them. I just think the "tooth paste lid" size valves spoils the watch for me. It doesnt mean you dont have to love it, its just an opinion. Id genuinly be interested in one if they cut that valve off. Its perfectly possible to make 300m dive watches without them.

[@TheRunningManZ]

www.hodinkee.com/articles/opinion-too-much-hot-air-about-helium-release-valves

[@kokibalboa9527]

@@TheRunningManZ does a diving watch needs a magnifying date window ?

[@TheRunningManZ]

koki balboa I’m not championing another watch here, just saying I don’t like the valve. It’s massive and spoils (for me) what looks an amazing watch for the money.

[@erikswenson915]

I am wondering if a few flooded watches from people not checking both crowns were tightened led to the unnecessary seals in the He valve..

[@phm14]

I owned the original 300M in quartz-a very nice piece I enjoyed for a few years before selling it forward. I've also owned, and sold along, a Rolex Sub C. I just ordered the '18 300M in blue, so there's my opinion ;)

[@modty]

How did you installed the butterfly clasp on the wide pin holes on the OEM rubber strap ? that was the only thing that made me didn't choose the rubber and went for the bracelet, I didn't know you can replace the bin with butterfly ! can you add more photos ?

[@dodge2451]

Love the Seamaster, I just cant get away with the magnification on the date on the Rolex, I think it makes it look very old fashioned and out of date. Omega all the way.

[@bigassworm]

There is a dateless version on the Rolex without the magnification.

[@peterfield1449]

Are the laser cut waves better looking then the older style waves? In images they look a little cheaper

[@sebsebseb1905]

I enjoy watching your videos about watches I can't afford a lot more than watching supercar videos about cars I can't afford :D

[@bighands69]

Depending on what age you are at some point you maybe able to afford those things. Most super cars are not that nice. A good Porsche sports car would be far better and far easier to obtain for working people.

[@czechmate-youtube]

The Omega Seamaster Diver 300m is my dream watch. My favourite versions are the silver dial, blue bezel and the white dial, black bezel versions. I love the open case back and the waves on the dial!

[@Audittr2108]

Omega revising their models so frequently is a bit of a double edged sword. On the one hand they update the specification and look of their models but on the other it quickly dates and devalues the old models which has an effect on how the brand is thought of. Rolex don’t keep messing around with their models. This gives the brand a certain amount of integrity. Some may think that watches such as the Submariner are a bit boring but when it’s right, it’s right. This theory is backed up when you think of the one Omega model that’s pretty much stayed the same - the Speedmaster Professional with hesalite. This is their one watch which is universally well thought of (apart from all the special editions over the years!).

[@peddlerjob]

Again & Again, Omega is chasing Rolex...

[@scottd1342]

Nonsense. Rolex watches look incredibly dated. The cyclops is a relic from the 80s and looks like dog shit on the crystal. Great if your 95 years old.

[@pimpmafuqa]

Rolex look tacky as fuck now dude. Every brand has their watch that stays the same and just gets improved internally over time, that's the speedmaster, the seamaster is meant to evolve and improve. Rolex has the submariner for its watch that stays the same, its just u fortunate it's a big rectangular piece of shit with a stupid fuckin cyclops and no clear case back. Yawn. But their flush helium escape valve is good. I'd like to see that on a seamaster if they don't refuse to do away with it entirely.

[@hrlloyd28]

I'd have to agree with you Chris

[@PointNemo9]

@@scottd1342 Only to your eyes, there are no objective perceptions

[@GregJ1]

The very subtle hand gestures by your hand model are the best! 🤚🏼

[@aveenmahabal]

My Submariner drops 15 secs after a week. My 2010 Seamaster 300m Diver (Pierce Brosnan blue) non 007 insignia, is dead on accurate to the second after a week of use.

[@RP-Golden_Time]

Bought the White dial version, the dial plays with the light a lot. A much more lively looking watch, compared to the competition. Steel bracelet looks a lot better in person than on their website. Very comfortable on wrist, crystal seems less smudgy compared to Rolex. I'm quite happy with the new watch. Good work Watchfinder with this video!