Let's get this straight, the job of jurors is not to right and wrong of the case. Generally speaking the outcome of jurors verdict will determined the outcome of the case, but it's not has to be or had always been. The judge's job is to apply the relevant of the law to the case while the juror's job is to determine the fact. Sometimes both the plaintiff and defendant will agree that the facts are the same and thus there is no need for jury, and in that case there is no jury involved. Even sometimes, in extremely rare case, jurors may say the facts go one direction and the winner of the case is one side, but the judge may and can direct the winner of the case in the opposite.
@tuck295q2 жыл бұрын
But if you look at the qualification requirement of jurors....it's pretty worrying.