Heaviest and most robust backpack? Fjällräven Kajka 85L review

Welcome to Hiking Sweden. Today we are taking a look at the ups and downs of the big pack - Fjällräven Kajka that I have been using for the last 8 months. Hope you enjoy!

[@jkgrooms7864]

Excellent review. I am looking at the Kajka 85L and the Klattermusen Tor 80L for longer winter excursions - 5d+. The Tor is lighter weight 2.4kg and is made form 840 denier nylon, but the functionality seems limited compared to the Kajka. Do you have any experience with Klattermusen packs? Thanks - J

[@burstfireno1617]

Thanks for this awsome review man :) im about to buy a Kajka too, i am 179cm. Donno if i should go with the 75 or 85L (too big??). How tall are you?

[@hikingswede]

Thank you! Im 178, using the 85L. Lenght wise I think it feels great.

[@burstfireno1617]

Hiking Swede tusind tak fra Danmark :)

[@Luddd78]

Om du skulle välja om? Gått på 75 istället?

[@Figue-]

Hi! Is the rain cover sold with it ? Or did you have to buy it separately ?

[@hikingswede]

It is included!

[@WESTMARSHIKEANDOUTDOORS]

👍

[@newbeginnings8566]

Thumbs up... What about wear and tear usage?

[@hikingswede]

Mark Bennett its a solid piece with tough fabric. :)

[@marcusjungblom1525]

Hej. Bra film. En fråga då jag själv tittar på just Kajka. Skulle du köpa den igen om du skulle välja idag med det du vet om den? Eller skulle du välja t ex en Lundhags eller annat märke?

[@hikingswede]

Jag har inte haft behov av 85 liter sedan jag använde den de första gångerna. Har gjort tur upp till 8 dagar med mindre ryggsäck och betydligt lättare ryggsäck. Jag tror det är bra att begränsa sig lite, annars hamnar man lätt i att det alltid finns en större rygga. Den är ju också lite onödigt tung :)

[@FRIPPE_THE_GREAT]

Har också en 85l; blir lätt att man blir en packåsna. Men den känns att det är kvalitetssäck och har inte ångrat mitt köp.

[@christianblanche1569]

Did you find anything lighter ???

[@DirtyRC101]

What about those two plastic loops at the bottom?

[@hikingswede]

What about them? Can be used to add extra gear for example sleeping pad.

[@joekelly9369]

i have the kajka 65 and 75l packs the 65 awesome for lighter summer gear 75 for thicker heavier gear and clothing , there is a big difference between the two , 10l doesnt sound a lot but it is with fjallraven. theyre tough as hell . well upto brambles and Scotlands granite mountains .. i darent take my osprey aether 65 , the sports bra materiels would pull and snag .. whereas the kajka's are tough , flallraven dont seem to make disposable gear like a lot of trend companies where you dispose of last years trendy osprey for this years model ... its a sad fact , but too many companies are heading that way , this kajka to me is like the old nikon lenses , made to last and passed on !

[@Luddd78]

To have 75 or 65 to have a well rounded pack?

[@shammohd1440]

What colour is your backpack green or grey?

[@hikingswede]

sham mohd its green!

[@tomatron64]

Seeing the difference between the Graphite and Forest green is really hard! The forest green one almost look gray in certain lighting.

[@Luddd78]

Hur kom det sig att du valde just 85 l?

[@hikingswede]

På den tiden, för att jag trodde att jag behövde det 😂 Idag vandrar jag upp till 6 dagar solo med 40L, annars Max 60.

[@user-wr9fo6dw8d]

Интересно