I'm an American blogger living in Japan, and my wife's uncle fought on this ship. We used to go over to his house and listen to his war stories on New Year's before he passed away in 2010.
@chefboahise11096 жыл бұрын
My name is somehow named after this ship.
@belfast48935 жыл бұрын
So? Everyone apparently have families that serve on all sides of the war, involved in all sort of disasters and either miraculously survived all of them or got revived somehow
@i_nameless_i-jgsdf5 жыл бұрын
No need to be a dick about it. He just wanted to share his story, the hell is matter with you ?
@fellovercliff45255 жыл бұрын
@@belfast4893 Well, until you can prove them wrong you should shut your trap hole!
@nekonohige25 жыл бұрын
Dear Peter Payne; Very nice of you to hear from his experience. Please also hear from those people whose family members were burn to death by the US bombing in your town. Most of the Japanese cities were bombed and many citizens were burned to death (like charcoal). The most terrible one was Tokyo Air Raid on 10th March 1945, where over 100,000 people were killed just one night.
@russellfheim6 жыл бұрын
My father C Fred Heim was awarded the navy cross for sinking this battleship at the Kure Harbor. He never talked to me about this, he passed away when i was 13, as his only child he was laid to rest at Arlington national cemetery Grave 5151
@wiliammenard32084 жыл бұрын
Arlington is a special place
@ralphdougherty18444 жыл бұрын
I'm calling bullshit
@AlexiaofHorus4 жыл бұрын
@@ralphdougherty1844 explain
@SealofPerfection4 жыл бұрын
@@ralphdougherty1844 30 seconds of Googling says the story is true: valor.militarytimes.com/hero/5957
@justsomeguywithasurprisede40594 жыл бұрын
@@SealofPerfection 30 seconds speedrun
@coloneltannenbusch297111 жыл бұрын
Hi, this video was filmed on 14 April 1946.
@ghostdiaries3695 жыл бұрын
What happened at Kure .... I see most of the battleships of IJN were destroyed there ?
This a translation of Bakkii's comment: "I think we are really lucky that the United States had the technology to shoot color images. Ironically, the loss would allow us to see the battlefield and the true nature of Japanese weapons at that time. After all, even if you look at black and white images, it doesn't seem to have really happened, and CG is a movement made no matter how elaborate it is."
@koto-koto-118 ай бұрын
さすがのアメリカでも当時はカラー持ってないよ。これは現代AIで色を塗ったヤツ
@WarhammerWings5 жыл бұрын
What a shame Ise was never repaired and turned to a museum/memorial to both sides of the war in the Pacific.
@Raptorsified2 жыл бұрын
This could be said of the majority of the fleet unfortunately. Luckily we still have Mikasa
@jessnalulila55522 жыл бұрын
Considering how destroyed Japan was after the war, they had bigger priorities
@sirboomsalot4902 Жыл бұрын
@@Raptorsified Fun fact; Mikasa was saved partially because of the efforts of Admiral Nimitz to have her restored. The Soviets had actually demanded her to be scrapped but we ignored them. It’s considered to have been a very bad restoration, but it paved the way for her to be the museum ship she is today. In 2009, in honor of their namesake, the crew of the USS Nimitz repainted Mikasa
@Zagoreni02A8 жыл бұрын
Such magnificent ship, shame it was not rebuilt as museum,
@MrBruinman868 жыл бұрын
The Damage was so catastrophic it just wasn't worth it. The bigger shame is that neither the Yamato or Mushashi survived the war. Those would have been amazing to see.
@ObamaTookMyCat5 жыл бұрын
@@MrBruinman86 there would have been no chance what so ever that Yamato or Musashi would have ended up as museums anyway, they would 100% have been test ships for the Bikini atoll tests, and they PROBABLY would have survived them. The US would not have missed an opportunity to pound 16 inch shells into them to see what kind of punishment they could have taken.
@MrBruinman865 жыл бұрын
@@ObamaTookMyCat You're probably right. They'd be sitting at the bottom of Bikini Atoll or scrapped.
@RW4X4X30065 жыл бұрын
More value as scrap or targets.
@nitetrane985 жыл бұрын
LOL By who?
@potatochobit8 жыл бұрын
this thing was half battleship and half aircraft carrier?
@ejaakawd46658 жыл бұрын
Yep, originally it was just a battleship but it was reconstructed to a hybrid battleship/carrier after Japan lost most of its carriers in the battle of midway.
@Slicksterzz7 жыл бұрын
They took off the rear gun turret and laid down a small flight deck. Not really useful in either role.
@douchebagpatrol72377 жыл бұрын
it's just half a ship now lol
@ArvexYT5 жыл бұрын
After losing a bunch of carriers in the Battle of Midway, the Japanese started partially converting some of their battleships into carrier/battleship hybrids and even started fully converting battleships that were still under construction into carriers (the Shinano, a full carrier, was originally a sister ship to the Yamato, but was converted into a carrier.)
@ethelredcrimmins89844 жыл бұрын
Slick sterzz Both rear turrets. As originally built she had 6 twin main gun turrets.
@spetsnatzlegion33664 жыл бұрын
‘Boom boom on the front half, zoom zoom on the back half’ ‘But isn’t it a mix of the worst of both worlds, an underarmed battleship which can only launch light planes with low payloads that can’t land easily?’ ‘Doesn’t matter because it’s gonna be cool’ -ise’s designers, probably
@patricklenigan43094 жыл бұрын
ironically, the Japanese made the foolish choice of going backwards in carrier development
@oveidasinclair9824 жыл бұрын
The Ise was an WWI era battle wagon built between 1910 and 1916 and like a lot of the US & UK WWI era ships, they were obsolete as all hell by 1943
@willthorson45432 жыл бұрын
It was actually a solid design. It wasn't missing any main guns. And the aircraft were for mostly reconnaissance for fleet ships.
@sirboomsalot4902 Жыл бұрын
@@willthorson4543 Ise lost two turrets when she was converted, though she was under armed for the 1940s anyways so it really didn’t matter
@remorselesscuckslayerii82764 жыл бұрын
"I served on this ship for 2 years before I opened up a chain of Sushi bars"...- Brian Williams MSNBC achor
@stephenfarthing4854 жыл бұрын
She was a Battlecarrier - and the direct predessor to the Kirov class of the Russian Navy. That operated as a Helecopter Missile Cruiser.
@heuhen4 жыл бұрын
Build as an battleship, but converted to and battlecarrier when IJN lost almost all there fleet carriers at battle of Midway. and Japan didn't have time and resources to build new carriers, so these ships was converted to fill in those role, until battleships that was under construction was converted to carrier. Kirov os not an helicopter missile cruiser, if she is then a destroyer is an helicopter missile destroyer. Kirov class is an nuclear-powered guided missile Battlecruiser. most Navy ships have helicopter deck and Hangar, some have space for only 1 helicopter, most have space for 2 helicopters and a few have space for 3+ what you are looking for is Moskva-class helicopter carrier, that is armed with missiles. And that is due to Soviet/Russian Navy is about defending the home water's and not over the horizon like the American. and secondly the reason that almost all navy ships in Soviet/Russian Navy was armed with so many missiles, was due to how ineffective those missiles was, and how easy target they was. So Soviet/Russian Navy went for the strategy of sending so many missile up in the air in the hope that a few will manage to get trough. But USA just made the SPY-1 radar that was made to deal with that (multi target tracking).
@A1V1NY2 жыл бұрын
My granpa said she is dreadnought battleship he used to use ise
@miniadler9 жыл бұрын
Nagato was launched 9. November 1919, not 1938 ^^
@謎姫-m6d3 жыл бұрын
主砲が空をにらんだままというのが余計悲しみを誘う。
@ジュント-o8j4 жыл бұрын
斜め後ろからの迫力すごいよね! あと煙突の周りが好き
@hikatsuusplace Жыл бұрын
My granpa served this ship and was a radio man
@hikatsuusplace Жыл бұрын
He died to pancreatic cancer
@鼓舞羅-q1o5 жыл бұрын
凄い貴重映像。
@kkhagerty63154 жыл бұрын
It’s like a battleship el Camino
@TheMNrailfan2274 жыл бұрын
Basically their entire navy circa 1945
@mikebell80124 жыл бұрын
Not one of Japan's brighter moves turning a battleship into a hybrid carrier.
@heuhen4 жыл бұрын
they had lost most of the carriers they had, so most battleships inder construction was converted to carriers during build or battleship that at this point didn't have much value, was converted to half/half carrier/battleship in hope they would need big guns again....
@mikebell80124 жыл бұрын
@@heuhen I understand why they did it, it was a desperation move however she couldn't carry enough planes to be effective as a carrier and by removing her aft turrets she wasn't effective as a battleship either.
@willthorson45432 жыл бұрын
It worked though. Just like the heavy cruisers like the mogami class were hybrid too. Those, all the turrets were at the front of the hull. They were actually good designs. Fleet recon aircraft.
@gruntforever7437 Жыл бұрын
@@willthorson4543 Considering their relatively slow speed, they were pretty worthless operating with the fleet. Capable of at most 26 knots when the rest of the carriers were capable of at least 32. Could only operate seaplanes which are very limited; recon only. I refuse to believe they could NOT have figured out something better then this mess.
@willthorson45432 жыл бұрын
It looks like it had camo on it. Grey and green and tan.
@rogeriman993510 жыл бұрын
Good post
@CornBot_Exterminator7 ай бұрын
"Ise still intends to fight"
@schrodinger60513 ай бұрын
😭😭😭
@raulduke61055 жыл бұрын
Amazing what 500lb bombs can do
@diegodelizsoto4 жыл бұрын
raul duke looks like a 2,000 or 1,000 lb bomb
@knightsofthewicked91213 жыл бұрын
Looks like more by the size of the hole in the ship
@metaknight1152 жыл бұрын
And to think that Yamato’s deck armor was completely resistant to those bombs
@エリンギ-h6c4 жыл бұрын
伊勢って最初から航空戦艦としてつくられったっけ?それとも、途中から?
@青タイツ兄貴4 жыл бұрын
確かミッドウェーで空母が不足したのと日向の五番砲塔がぶっ飛んだのがきっかけだっけか
@KV-UmarWOTB4 жыл бұрын
mm... thats not heavy damage thats a floating wreck
@AlexiaofHorus4 жыл бұрын
I'm surprised its even floating
@JeovahLovesYou4 жыл бұрын
I think it's bottomed out. The shore is shallow.
@jimpolk26522 жыл бұрын
@@AlexiaofHorus it’s not floating. It’s sunk in swallow water.
@AlexiaofHorus2 жыл бұрын
@@jimpolk2652 oh good to know thank ya
@ngk42794 жыл бұрын
This is the only aviation battleship i know . Is there any ships than this one
@Issar1374 жыл бұрын
Yes,Aircraft Carriers
@ngk42794 жыл бұрын
@@Issar137 i mean during the world wars
@Issar1374 жыл бұрын
@@ngk4279 Also Aircraft Carriers
@ngk42794 жыл бұрын
@@Issar137 i mean ships that got a flight deck and big guns in one hull
@kkhagerty63154 жыл бұрын
AyAyA just her and her sister ship Hyuga, there where plans to convert the Iowa’s and Richelieu’s to half deck carriers but they where never done
@Madenity3 жыл бұрын
They should salvage it if they can
@tsuaririndoku11 ай бұрын
Which they refloated her and making her a museum ship or atleast send to be sunk somewhere. I don’t like to see Battleships being scrapped. It’s kinda dishonorable
@oveidasinclair9824 жыл бұрын
This ship looks like most of this damage was done to it while in port by US bombers
@warp9p6595 жыл бұрын
Interesting how the Japanese wasted so much of their resources on converting these two elderly vessels into hybrid battleship-carriers that ended up serving no useful purpose whatever in that role.
@bigwitt1874 жыл бұрын
They were desperate and didn't have time to construct carriers from scratch. They lost four fleet carriers at Midway and never recovered. They finished a few carriers that were under construction but it didn't help their situation. The Taiho was sunk 3 months after being commissioned and the Shinano lasted a week; both were taken out by submarines. By that time it was clear that ships were little more than targets if they didn't have air cover.
@VersusARCH4 жыл бұрын
Desperate times - desperate measures. US likewise ordered a zillion light and jeep carriers (of low value compared to longer to build Essex class carriers) and managed to complete some in time as a stopgap measure as their pre-war carrier fleet got depleated. But the Japanese were also exhausted in 1943. and paused carrier operations to re-build. And the US industrial and technological superiority made a telling difference in that interlude as can be seen by the results of the Battle of the Philippine Sea.
@lawrencewestby92294 жыл бұрын
VersusARCH, to add to your post, the USN light carriers were constructed on light cruiser hulls that had already been ordered as cruisers and then switched to be carriers. They were definitely needed in 1943 as by the end of 1942 only Enterprise and Saratoga remained in the Pacific (Ranger was in the Atlantic and Essex was newly commissioned and still working up).
@gruntforever7437 Жыл бұрын
@@bigwitt187 IT was more the inability to replace the Carrier Air Groups that doomed the IJN to being nothing but targets by 1944. Japan had such a draconian training program it was incapable of replacing battle losses. and also the lack of fuel meant they could not train them in actual aircraft after 1943. The IJN air groups that were slaughtered in the Great Marianas Turkey Shoot (other wise known as the battle of the Phillipine Sea) were pitifully inexperienced compared to the IJN crews that started the war; considered by most historians to be the finest group of flyers in the world at that time.
@proudveteran46964 жыл бұрын
Why didn’t it sink?
@ElRollioau4 жыл бұрын
It did. It's on the bottom
@christiandietz63415 жыл бұрын
Why did the Japanese put so much crap so high on the ship decks? Visibility?
@stephengardiner98675 жыл бұрын
The Japanese big-gun ships relied in optical rangefinders and sighting mechanisms throughout , basically, their entire active careers during WWII. They were woefully far behind in radar technology. The higher a big rangefinder was sited, the further away you could detect a surface target (enemy ship) and get an accurate fix on its position in order to engage it. Their optical systems were quite good (still are...Nikon, Canon etc.) but they never came close to developing radar for main or secondary battery direction. The almost ludicrous "pagoda" towers on some of their battlewagons must have seriously affected the stability of the ships.
@heuhen4 жыл бұрын
@@stephengardiner9867 if you see modelship of these battleships, you will see how small these pagoda is compared to the ship it self. "pagoda"
@g2macs5 жыл бұрын
A bit of filler and a paint job and she'll be right as rain.
@Kwolfx4 жыл бұрын
And Duck tape. It will hold anything together.
@julioherrera13633 жыл бұрын
Extraordinario
@DABoi165 жыл бұрын
Is she still alive in Japan today I wanna know please! 😳
@lordbadman92645 жыл бұрын
Kantai Lane no she was scrapped but she is alive and well in world of warships I have her
@snowindafunboots43695 жыл бұрын
Bravo Kantai..what a nice comment guy👍👍👍👍👍. I just know that theres an awesome museum with ALL the ingos and remains of the greatest ship of......
@Abrams65783 жыл бұрын
@@lordbadman9264 she was only added into WOWS af of today, pretty sure you confused her with her predecessor Fuso.
@yuigahama31892 жыл бұрын
@@Abrams6578 hyugā actually
@Abrams65782 жыл бұрын
@@yuigahama3189 I said Predecessor, not Sister.
@brooksrowlett24948 жыл бұрын
Tuskegee Airmen Us Army Air Force were In Europe. This is Japanese home port and these were sunk by US Navy carrier pilots.
@dekcali20004 жыл бұрын
My father CF HeimJunior flew off of the Lexington, and was awarded the Navy cross for a direct hit on the battleship Ise. He never talked about it when I was a kid, he died when I was 13 and is now buried in Arlington national cemetery. Although I do have his flight log book and in it there is mentioning of and possibly getting the Navy cross award which I have hanging on my wall right now. God bless you Dad, so we could have a choice in this free country. Never in my wildest dreams that I would think that communism would be here in this country.
@DividedByZeero4 жыл бұрын
Great ship which was one of the few of her kind Part carrier and battleship, she want a normal battleship
@csipi8911 жыл бұрын
when were these videos made?
@grumsha5 жыл бұрын
Kure harbor Japan 45-46
@chriscase13924 жыл бұрын
What were they thinking? Wasting resources on essentially useless ships when they despereatly needed real carriers, not lightly armored seaplane tenders. Interesting footage, though.
@asedecraft4 жыл бұрын
they didn't had the time to rebuild entire cv fleet these battlecariers were supposed to assist actual carriers to get more planes in the air and also with aa cover. didn't work that well though
@heuhen4 жыл бұрын
they had lost many of their carriers, so they converted battleships that was under construction to carriers and converted older battleships in to an carrier battleship, they could still do escort and support missions. just like USA had both large carriers and small carriers, where the small carriers had an support role (sort of), IJN just did the same but on a larger battleship hull, so what you see is and escort carrier in the rear and fleet support/defence/AAW vessel to the front that can assist on Japans Islands invasion with both artillery support and some air coverage together with other carriers. and Japan was in need of as many ships as possible to carry aircraft... they was starting to lose in numbers against the US massive industry
@navyreviewer4 жыл бұрын
Mmmm. Once I thought so too. Now I realise not so. From day one till the end japan never had a carrier shortage. That is to say they never had more pilots and planes then their, at the moment, active carriers could handle. Never. They were always short on qualified pilots. Building more carriers wouldnt have fixed that. This is part of the reason this carriers ended the war in the mud at Kure rather then being sunk at sea. You can see my video on the Shokaku class for more.
@vojvoda90604 жыл бұрын
Damage????? DESTROYED.
@heuhen4 жыл бұрын
yes damaged, she just sitting on shallow water....
@lingcod914 жыл бұрын
So is it still there . . . got repaired . . . cut up and made into Honda's . . . What . . . ? Finish the story.
@peekaboo15752 жыл бұрын
I mirror the sentiment of many other commenters here. Ships like the Ise and the many actual carriers that the IJN had should have been preserved. It's a shame that they're all gone. Oh well, that's war.
@muhamadatzaals.d96764 жыл бұрын
Must be the aviation of Essex class carrier fleet :I
@heuhen4 жыл бұрын
U.S.S. Lexington, it was Bombing Squadron 94 (VB-94), that was on that run. I just read some comments and googled a little. there was a comment about his father sunk that aircraft: valor.militarytimes.com/hero/5957 then I just googled Bombing Squadron 94 (VB-94): www.tracesofwar.com/npersons/345/Bombing-Squadron-94-VB-94.htm
@smc19424 жыл бұрын
I think I can fix it.... ....I'm going to need a LOT of duct tape!!!
@phantomaviator13183 жыл бұрын
here from wtlive
@Anastasia_Romanova19018 жыл бұрын
Neh Japan before wants to destroy every damage ship
@totonariadi24894 жыл бұрын
mana suaranya ???
@dutchman72165 жыл бұрын
Cool
@mehmetisk47754 жыл бұрын
looks like Nagato or Kongo
@garkar9084 жыл бұрын
I thought it was the Creamofsomeyounguy
@muhamadatzaals.d96764 жыл бұрын
Did this
@vectorconcepts110 жыл бұрын
Damn !
@brooksrowlett24948 жыл бұрын
This color is awful. The other version on KZbin looks much more believable. Even the sky looks green in this version. I don't buy it.
@Cyberpuppy636 жыл бұрын
probably a failed attempt to colorize black and white footage.
@Insert-Retarded-Reply-Here4 жыл бұрын
Brooks Rowlett Fucking rich kid that always think that ww2 era filmed videos should look like a high quality 2020 video. Moron
@brooksrowlett24944 жыл бұрын
@@Insert-Retarded-Reply-Here You have it exactly backwards. I KNOW the deterioration happens and I even have some comprehension of the chemistry responsible for the color shift of the original film. My comment was addressed to people who somehow think this is accurate color - one of the better colorizers on the internet has been apparently misled by this video to produce a colorized B&W image of one of these ships with dark green as the darker color, instead of the correct original gray that we know of from the other film version in better original color that was available. SInce you totally misunderstood my comment, my only failure is in clear communications. I would respectfully ask you to reconsider my comment in light of my clarification.