"The plain truth is, that he was a most intolerable ruffian, a disgrace to human nature, and a blot of blood and grease upon the History of England." Charles Dickens.
@just.lolly.gagging17 күн бұрын
Him and Churchill.
@neilsprange436416 күн бұрын
Or, as Terry-Thomas might have said: "he was a most despicable cad and bounder".😁
@e.m.doherty72316 күн бұрын
Absolute piece of crap. I feel sorry for the English for having this tyrant ruin their countries’ Christian heritage, and burning ancient monastic texts, almost dating back to antiquity. He was a self centred, fat, greedy, violent, abusive, power hungry, foolish tyrant that ever held the British crown. What I am surprised about, is that he didn’t meet a more suitable death. Usually Kings who make huge power plays like these, and oppress their own people, meet a violent end. However, Henry just ate himself to death, which is a direct result from his own greed. Despicable.
@jamesdellaneve900516 күн бұрын
“Yes. But what did Henry the VIII ever do for us?”
@heliotropezzz33316 күн бұрын
@jamesdellaneve9005 Boosted the tourist industry, revived interest in history, created the church of England (if that's seen as a positive). Provided material for TV, films and authors. I can't think of much else.
@WendyWatersctmm18 күн бұрын
Henry is the reason power should NEVER be concentrated in one set of hands.
@michaeldebidart18 күн бұрын
Caligula did it first
@10_rds_Fire_For_Effect17 күн бұрын
@@michaeldebidart There were other psychos before Caligula.
@ccahill232217 күн бұрын
@@michaeldebidart , So that "excuses" being an amoral asshole? Like "if I don't throw you out of your house someone else will." You have "high" sense of "moral reasoning?" You're not a "banker" are you?
@jeffreygreene104217 күн бұрын
Trump is our Henry the Vlllth
@woowah3217 күн бұрын
@@jeffreygreene1042 In what sense, exactly?
@jamescanterbury663418 күн бұрын
Henry viii was evil like a mob boss. No matter how loyal you are you’re at risk
@Mykee199718 күн бұрын
Sounds a lot like the mob boss going into the White House soon, just not as graphic and brutal.
@merlinstwin737318 күн бұрын
@@Mykee1997 Yet
@donaldreilly657417 күн бұрын
@@Mykee1997are you really this stupid?
@ccahill232217 күн бұрын
@@Mykee1997 , He'll just be serving the same "mob boss" the exiting criminal "Joe" was serving, namely, Netanyahu.
@woowah3217 күн бұрын
@@merlinstwin7373Awww bless 😂❄️
@DBEdwards18 күн бұрын
These monasteries provided food and shelter for the unfortunate and disadvantaged of their communities. Henry's foul smelling leg sore was a reminder he deprived many needy then of compassion and care.
@Maesterful18 күн бұрын
He really was the monster of the monasteries... Such an evil king
@quentinquentin675218 күн бұрын
They also provided education for poorer families. They were the social services of the 16th century, until this truly wicked, evil man chose to end their existence to enrich himself and his cronies.
@danawinsor138018 күн бұрын
The destruction of the monastaries under Henry VIII stands as one of the greatest injustices in history.
@danawinsor138018 күн бұрын
@@Maesterful "Monster of the monasteries" is a great phrase. I'm wondering if you're a writer.
@Paulad39uk17 күн бұрын
@@Maesterful Not as evil as some of the "church" and other religious leaders before or since. Religion has been the cause of most wars over the centuries.
@michaelraiger62316 күн бұрын
I’ve been to Glastonbury many times and as a Catholic, am inspired by Witing’s great courage and integrity in opposing the despotic Henry. I always hike the Tor when I visit, and the memory of Witing is one of the things foremost in mind. It’s a story that should be more widely known. I commend you for video.
@gerardducharme214613 күн бұрын
On my mother side was father William Weston s.j. She a descendant from a member of the family of brothers somewhere or sister. Although my mother side was Anglican, she converted to Catholicism before I was born. Still, England had a very gruesome history on how Catholics were treated. Keep the faith brother.
@Mark130919616 күн бұрын
What was enacted upon the catholics by this tyrant was obscene in the extreme, so how more ironical is the seemingly endless list of revolting revelation by catholic priests and establishments around the globe ever afterwards
@Decgyrrl15 күн бұрын
Now why would he want to do this to an elderly man? He was nothing but a monstrous bully, and all the power he had made him over the top! I felt bad for his wives & I felt bad for the others executed in his court. He was in a word: disgusting.
@alyu112918 күн бұрын
The illustrious founder of the Anglican Church. The entire reason for being of the Church of England was to serve this monster's interests.
@michaellawson572216 күн бұрын
This was a Catholic country the people mostly loved Catherine of Arrogance I was forced to be a Catholic at my infant school by SisterTeresa head mistress and her cruel bullying side kick deputy Sìster Bernadette who had horrible orange make up and would kick you if you stould out of line a pervert obviousely yes females can be !! Hated men no doubt she was the closest thing to a Witch even witches boots like the old cartoon winnie the witch ever have seen a female Napoleon vertically challenged Teresa was over six foot But she had nothing on Henry t 8th he was a greedy syphillitic over fed puss ridden piece of ? Yeah who ever quoted what Dickens said had it bang on . I, however, fell back on the religion as father Ryan bless him, trying to keep my parents from divorcing. The last person to be burnt at the stake for being a Catholic in Litchfield 1571 then it wasn't till the early 1830,s one was allowed to be one in this country. I was.born in Walmley now spelt the Anglo saxon way since 1610 John Speeds map spells it Warmley which fired up my interest in history. Any body see digging for Britain last night brilliant .❤
@shawnastephens153617 күн бұрын
Gosh darn Henry was horrible. I've been watching The Tudors and he is bat shit crazy.
@selecttravelvacations747214 күн бұрын
I highly recommend the movie “Firebrand” which is about Katherine Parr and her relationship with him as his last wife. Historical fiction based on facts. The ending is awesome!
@briansullivan590810 күн бұрын
He was portrayed less nuts then he was.
@emmalogan864117 күн бұрын
So happy that you used ‘hanged’ and not ‘hung’ in the title!
@ccahill232217 күн бұрын
@emmalogan8641, Just because you think you're funny does not excuse your downright ignorance? Or your poor understanding of the English language. A job on "the National Inquirer" perhaps?
@TillyOrifice16 күн бұрын
Correct! Drawn sounds dodgy though.
@gtlfb16 күн бұрын
@@ccahill2322 The correct form for “hang”, when referring to execution, is indeed “hanged”.
16 күн бұрын
How do you know? Perhaps he was well hung, there’s no way of knowing now.
@MegaWoody196314 күн бұрын
@ccahill2322 you might want to check it out, 'hanged' is indeed the correct terminology for such an execution.
@danielkarmy489318 күн бұрын
Henry, of course, would have been quite incapable of ever taking these horrors into his own hands and executing his evil will himself. He relied ever on others to do his bidding. History will remember him for all time as a tyrant, a coward, and the personification of all that is worst in humanity - for what he was, far below human. I am not an especially religious person, but if it means that there is a hell in which Henry screams for ever more, then I will gladly believe.
@Maesterful18 күн бұрын
It's not often I come across people who despise Henry more than I do but today is the day. Kudos 😂
@danawinsor138018 күн бұрын
The irony is that Henry VIII was admired during his youth as one of the most highly educated and enlightened young men in Europe. Sir Thomas More, among others, was a friend of Henry's and was rewarded by being tried and executed. More was executed by decapitation, which was merciful when compared to the unspeakable cruelty meted out to others during that era.
@MichaelTheophilus90618 күн бұрын
Believe!
@Paulad39uk17 күн бұрын
Why have a dog and bark yourself comes to mind. Henry just gave out the orders.
@jonboz758516 күн бұрын
He sounds like Trump.
@Maesterful18 күн бұрын
A monster making a martyr out of a man...🙏📿
@Tugela6018 күн бұрын
Most rulers at the time did similar things, he was not unusual in that respect. What outraged his contemporaries was not him executing people, it was him getting rid of inconvenient wives and especially him taking over the church. That offended their sense of chivalry and piety.
@woowah3217 күн бұрын
We’d have been stuck with Catholicism if it wasn’t for him, though! #everycloud
@UKVeteran202417 күн бұрын
A serial killer in plain sight.
@discover-london15 күн бұрын
All Henry was interested in was collecting palaces and castles. He had acquired over 50 when he died.
@kathygoulden292513 күн бұрын
And women
@zitherzon212117 күн бұрын
A true monster. The originator of "Boil him in oil." The most selfish King that England ever had. (And that's saying something.)
@kathygoulden292513 күн бұрын
The youngest of the Apostles was boiled in oil. John did not die either. He was exiled to the isle of Patmos. He died of old age...the only Apostle to have a natural death
@justinneill500316 күн бұрын
Mad, bad, and dangerous to know.
@memkiii16 күн бұрын
*_An_* 80 year old monk.
@kathygoulden292513 күн бұрын
King Henry was a jerk!
@GnomicMaster16 күн бұрын
I know Glastonbury (aka Glasty) very well. I was engaged for 6 years to a Glasty woman, and I traveled to England a dozen times during those 6 years, each time staying for two weeks. Every time I was there I visited the Abbey ruins. I found that sitting inside those ruins (each time with nobody else there) was very peaceful. I also would hike to the top of the Tor almost daily. I got a kick out of the sign by the Abbey ruins claiming it's the grave of King Arthur. One of the docents there laughed and admitted Arthur isn't buried there but that the claim brings paying tourists.
@GalootWrangler18 күн бұрын
The curious preview image with ladders depicts the execution of Hugh Despenser the Younger, a favorite of the ill-fated Edward II.
@conversemackem865317 күн бұрын
Brilliant, you are the only person I have met/encountered in the last 40 years that has correctly said "hanged" instead of using the term "hung" (which applies to a painting/picture), The correct use of the English language. 👍
@joyburnett113317 күн бұрын
When people say he/her was hung, it drives me mad
@alanadair489316 күн бұрын
Both painful 🤔😂😂
@neilsprange436416 күн бұрын
It's just a shame they didn't say Henry VIII 'hanged, DREW and quartered...".
@Oligodendrocyte13916 күн бұрын
@neilsprange4364 Or better: "How Henry VIII had an 80 year old monk hanged, drawn and quartered.". I mean, he didn't do it himself 😊.
@futatorius16 күн бұрын
Yeah, but why pronounce "Whiting" like "Whitting"?
@PeterKavanagh-c8o16 күн бұрын
I understand that Henry was personally responsible for the deaths of up to one hundred thousand people including two of his wives, his aunty Margaret, friends and many monks, priests and nuns. Henry's daughter Mary killed perhaps one fiftieth as many but is called "bloody" because she was Catholic.
@selecttravelvacations747214 күн бұрын
And she only ruled 4-5 years. With time…she would have out done her father. She’s called “bloody” because she’s a woman.
@rafthejaf878918 күн бұрын
This grotesque account makes you realise that the sympathetic and favourable portrayal of Thomas Cromwell in the recent BBC Wolf Hall series was nothing more than well made and slick propaganda. As Orwell said, "those who control the present control the past, and those who control the past control the future.".
@dh203217 күн бұрын
Yes, same here too! yoyr comment needs more likes so this part never made the edit then ?
@stuartleslie542118 күн бұрын
As far as I can determine this was a peculiarly English form of execution. The rest of Europe had equally monstrous forms of ritual killing, such as impaling on wooded stakes, being torn apart by horses or winches, and breaking on the wheel, the most advanced form of which was devised particularly for use by Christians on other Christians. Also beheading, being flogged to death with whips and scourges, burnt alive, garotted etc, all done in public and as popular entertainment. Most people know about the huge crowds that turned out at Tyburn to watch the regular hangings well into the 1800s but this was the tail end of the public horror shows going on since early Medieval times. And we depict the Aztecs as terrible. They never matched Europeans for brutality, sadism and torture.
@Ian-mj4pt18 күн бұрын
Really? 😅😅all were equally despicable.
@MichaelTheophilus90618 күн бұрын
FYI. They weren't Christians.
@alyu112918 күн бұрын
Human sacrifice by Aztecs wasn't as bad because they weren't committed by whites. Whatever you say. Lol
@stuartleslie542117 күн бұрын
@@Ian-mj4pt No they weren't. While the Aztecs practiced ritual executions (they had no word for "sacrifice"} on high ceremonial occasions, their behaviour and culture was systematically blackened and hugely exaggerated by the Spanish Invaders to cover up their own appalling atrocities. These were fully documented at the time by Fra Bartolome De Las Casas in his book "An Account Of The Destruction Of The Indies" , which is still in print and I have not been able to finish because every human depravity is detailed performed by the Spanish invaders. For a full account of the growth of the mythology surrounding the invasion and the Aztecs, see Matthew Restall: "When Montuzuma Met Cortez".
@Jollykins-h9s17 күн бұрын
Did you know that the defunct travel agent started out by organising gathering for public executions?
@robertdobie254413 күн бұрын
One of my grandfathers was born in the 1800s (1899). The time of King Henry VIII was not that long ago, in the grand scheme of things. Makes me shudder to think that if civilization takes a turn for the worse, this kind of barbarity could return.
@izakhaber407511 күн бұрын
What you call the war in Gaza? A love fear
@merlinstwin737318 күн бұрын
Wolf Hall downplays how much Cromwell acted like a common mob boss capo. Loyalty, or expediency cause him to do evil in the king's name, and then inevitably, the king turned on him because he himself had no loyalty. It's an old story. Sad to say, many innocent people suffered and died thanks to them and Henry's greed.
@shirley015114 күн бұрын
I didn't read much about Cromwell and watched Wolf Hall. I actually felt sorry for him. Now, having read more about him, they were all nasty and cruel.
@briansullivan590810 күн бұрын
Cromwell wound up like a lot of capos, sleeping with the fishes, metaphorically
@partridgehearne18 күн бұрын
Whiting as in the fish, not Whitting. There was a saying "When whiting on the Tor is caught the abbey itself will come to nought"
@TomLaios18 күн бұрын
She is correct.Late Medieval English was pronounced very differently than modern English.
@DanBeech-ht7sw15 күн бұрын
@TomLaios Tudor English by this stage is early modern. The Great Vowel Shift had already occurred in southern England- by this date the Midlands and north were catching up with southern England. So the Abbott was almost certainly whiting not whitting
@Ryansghost16 күн бұрын
To all the grammar inspectors: Is the ' hanged, not hung' thing all you drew from this sad tale?
@hex404717 күн бұрын
"Blessed are the merciful, for they shall obtain mercy" Matthew 5:7, which means that those who show mercy to others will also receive mercy from God; essentially stating that being compassionate and forgiving towards others is a blessed quality to possess.
@williamcattr26717 күн бұрын
Henry was so arrogant and savage-like.
@barrywest217018 күн бұрын
Henry is known in Glastonbury as the black magician
@cyndicook775518 күн бұрын
Why do they show a picture of Hugh Despenser in the thumbnail? He was hundreds of years before Henry.
@rexcowan920915 күн бұрын
He fell off his horse and possibly had brain damage.
@Johnthestudent17 күн бұрын
This is the man who founded the Anglican Church. He started the Anglicans to satisfy his greed, not because he wanted to reform anything. Please, Anglicans, tell us why you follow him.
@joyburnett113317 күн бұрын
Henry still considered himself Catholic but instead of the pope being the head of the Catholic church, Henry proclaimed himself head of the church in England
@natashatomlinson454816 күн бұрын
The United Methodists came directly from the Anglican Church. They get their horrid episcopal form of government straight from they despot Henry VIII. That denomination is now dying not because of homosexuality but because of its horrid form of governmeb5 which worships bishops not Christ .
@DanBeech-ht7sw15 күн бұрын
That's like asking you why Catholics still follow popes Urban VI and John XII
@primus777614 күн бұрын
Ask Paula Vennels, CEO of the Post Office when hundreds of sub-postmasters were wrongly accused of theft in the biggest scandal in British legal history. Anglican Bishop candidate.
@DanBeech-ht7sw14 күн бұрын
@primus7776 no longer, after that came to light. However, Keith O'Brien remained a cardinal until he died. Bernard Law, remained a cardinal until he died. McCarrick - evidence suppressed until he was too demented to stand trial. So don't get too prissy about the Anglicans
@jamesdellaneve900516 күн бұрын
OK. I’ve changed my mind. He’s not a nice guy. May the cleric have a rich eternity for his faith.
@christopherp.hitchens390213 күн бұрын
Well, the priesthood is not exactly innocent of atrocities against people and children. The best question in each case would be “Where is your god”?
@LisaLGruman17 күн бұрын
Very unaware of this level of cruelty. 💔
@anitachopping16 күн бұрын
Not really Christian was it. Great way to start a new church
@The_momur17 күн бұрын
He was worse than I imagined.
@jamieknight32618 күн бұрын
I’m starting to think Henry wasn’t a very nice man :)
@hunter_lite16 күн бұрын
an 80 year old monk
@sacradotjoannes17 күн бұрын
It is ironic that Richard and his two companions are now blessed and martyrs in heaven, while Henry Cromwell, Sadler, and Gregory Cromwell are more than likely in Hell! May Blessed Richard and his companions intercede for us!
@ndie80759 күн бұрын
Henry has received his eternal verdict.....as catholic I am convinced about this....
@AussiePom16 күн бұрын
It was a very different England to today. There were public executions which were entertainment for the people. Women were bashed and no one took any notice. Most nobility where executed on Tower Hill not in the Tower of London for you had to be extremely well connected to be disconnected at the Tower. Commoners who were judged to be traitors were hanged drawn and quartered. In those days it was all quite normal behaviour. This sort of "entertainment" is still carried on today in some Arab countries.
@kathygoulden292513 күн бұрын
Public hangings were that way in America in the 1800's.
@pup100814 күн бұрын
Very well done & interesting. I was going to let it ride as I thought the uploader might have been American before watching but, in your header - "A 80 year old monk?" 🤔
@AnthonyVeneziano-h8v12 күн бұрын
What also amazes me with tudor history is that people go on about how horrible Queen Mary was calling her bloody Mary but her father as well as Elizabeth we're just as cruel.
@peterbock53729 күн бұрын
It was Thomas Cromwell, who gave the order to do so with clergymen and monks. But as a ruler one is responsible to the deeds and the crimes of the ministers. Henry VIII sometimes also was rather terrified about the increasing brutality and cruelty of Cromwell. At last he saw, that Cromwell grew to become a serious problem for the crown. We also know, what Cromwells grandnephew Oliver was able to. He was a really gruesome religious fanatic. He did not only kill a king but he ist also responsible for the conflicts among protestants and catholics in Ireland, which last until recent days. The interesting thing is, that Oliver Cromwell also had been a decessor of a Tudor named Jasper.
@kilowhiskeyalpha607816 күн бұрын
How an 80 year old monk was hung,drawn and quartered by Henry VIII
@chrisschepper931218 күн бұрын
What a Richard he was.
@NikolausFedermann-im5nf5 күн бұрын
Henry always has fantastic ideas.
@David0lyle18 күн бұрын
The sad little bit of this was that Henry was missing some of the support for his kingship. Really though there weren’t a whole bunch of other choices. He was “good enough” 🤦♂️ Ooo Damm did he ever make everyone who supported him sorry. If there weren’t enemies everywhere when he started there certainly were when he was done.
@philipalcock986717 күн бұрын
As a Catholic, I find it amusing that the Anglican Church was established by a brutal, obscene ruler like Henry VIII. it reflects badly upon the powerful lackies, religious and otherwise, who enforced his self-seeking whims.
@markstevenson663516 күн бұрын
Spanish Inquisition
@philipalcock986716 күн бұрын
@ agreed, but massively and almost comically exaggerated as to its extent and methods - religious propaganda about it was like Ian Paisley’s ‘Bells and Smells’. And remember that people really believed in Christ and salvation back then so the horrific cruelties that all religions inflicted back then for ‘heresy’ were seen as spiritually necessary. Psychotic Henry VIII created his church for dynastic purposes and to pillage the monasteries of their wealth so he could finance his wars and policies - not because of any love of God - as I understand it.
@DanBeech-ht7sw15 күн бұрын
Given that your denomination has had popes who I do not expect to meet in the afterlife, your remark evokes the Pharisee in the parable of the Pharisee and the tax collector
@bernardedwards846117 күн бұрын
Why does Henry's beard change suddenly from red to black and back again, did he dye it?
@FelixstoweFoamForge15 күн бұрын
Come on, we know that most monks from the monasteries were given pensions.
@janetpattison847416 күн бұрын
Wow, we all knew he was bad, but this takes it to another low. I wonder how how his future lives will go?
@corriemcnab16 күн бұрын
A great reformer
@elizalam525318 күн бұрын
Henry was wicked. The only good reason he was alive was to have Elizabeth I.
@peterkrauss696218 күн бұрын
And she was wicked
@DavidGrush18 күн бұрын
@@peterkrauss6962 less than Bloody Marie
@DavidGrush18 күн бұрын
His brother Arthur was good, too bad...
@willie276118 күн бұрын
@@peterkrauss6962 Henry and Elizabeth the First both murdered hundreds of thousands but Mary ( who executed about 600) is known as Bloody Mary
@alexburt699518 күн бұрын
Actually, no. She was a fairly compassionate ruler for her time. The Catholics threatened her, called for her death and plotted against her. Any violence she dished out was in response to these threats. She started off her reign believing in freedom of religion.
@michelleburke567416 күн бұрын
Blessed Nicholas Postgate was a priest in North Yorkshire. He was hung drawn and quartered in York. He was older. Perhaps 83 years old. Both tragic and unjust deaths and caused by political anti-Catholic persecution.
@fulham195810 күн бұрын
I remember getting detention for calling Henry a savage beast in a History lesson 🤣
@robinterkzer812816 күн бұрын
What a monster !
@jamesdeleos65018 күн бұрын
Not BORN AGAIN!
@maryb218516 күн бұрын
Just a point about the headline description. The correct expression is Hung, Drawn and Quartered. The reason is that the word hanged relates to being killed by hanging. But the method of death being discussed here is hung drawn and quartered which means hung but taken down while still alive so he could suffer the other punishment which is drawn (disembowelled) and quartered (attached by arms and legs to four different horses and torn apart) all while still alive. If he had been hanged first he would have been dead before the punishment.
@fionaoliver723713 күн бұрын
How despicable,executing a devout pious old monk,80 yrs old,what a vile act.
@dandy19315 күн бұрын
I doubt Henry had much involvement in matters like this other than signing the death warrant, he was too busy dressing in his finery and looking for his next wife to be concerned about a monk or two. He was too much of a Popinjay
@charlesburgoyne-probyn604417 күн бұрын
Still royalists will justify him
@DanBeech-ht7sw15 күн бұрын
Do they? I think the break with Rome was correct, but the motives for initiating it in England were not.
@charlesburgoyne-probyn604415 күн бұрын
I was speaking over ten years ago to an old woman who said well of him and she was a right royalist
@charlesburgoyne-probyn604415 күн бұрын
Nowadays people don't really care about church alignment to Rome or not
@eckyhen16 күн бұрын
Henry made Stalin look like a thoroughly decent human being.
@cambs018116 күн бұрын
Not really. Henry 8th killed in thousands, Stalin killed in millions.
@e.m.doherty72316 күн бұрын
@@cambs0181Stalin just had modern tools to be more effective at killing. Henry had more unchecked power in my opinion, and he used it all to his own advantage.
@fionaoliver723713 күн бұрын
Henry's rotting leg & syphilis must of affected his mind, poisoned him & made him go mad,how else would you describe his brutal behaviour.
@woowah3217 күн бұрын
The only time you’d be in 4 places at the same time!😂 Brutal times indeed.
@treble2017 күн бұрын
It is Whiting...not Whitting.
@freewheelinfranklyn13 күн бұрын
In the days of Henry viii the king had to show that he was tough. In his youth he jousted and hunted and later in life he arranged the occasional brutal execution to keep his enemies and wives and relatives on their toes. But nowadays the monarchy has no natural enemies or usurpers ( I doubt that Andrew can raise an army) and very little work to do but dress up, smile and wave at peasants from balconies, cars, carriages and the royal yacht. How quaint! Hence they have curtailed the brutal executions for the time being, by order of the King
@gerrytyrrell150716 күн бұрын
The tyrant & his reformed taliban destroyed Merry England & a Catholic faith the English people loved.
@berteisenbraun741517 күн бұрын
The British Royals have a lot to answer for!
@10_rds_Fire_For_Effect17 күн бұрын
You mean the current generation of Royals, who have never tortured or murdered anyone? Are you saying people should answer for what their ancestors did? Are you sure your ancestors didn't partake in or commit any atrocities? What happened in the distant past is in the distant past. It cannot be undone and blaming current generations does not make anything right. The British Royals who had a lot to answer for are long gone. It's too late.
@neilsprange436416 күн бұрын
There was no such thing as 'British' royals in Henry VIII's day, the Tudors were kings and queens of England, even if he did make his sister marry the King of Scots.
@10_rds_Fire_For_Effect17 күн бұрын
Elder abuse it was.
@iuno77710 күн бұрын
and this is the man the Brits are proud of...
@lostinfens17 күн бұрын
And today's royalty is no better.
@kathygoulden292513 күн бұрын
Not in England. The Middle East perhaps but not England
@andrewherold38912 күн бұрын
Oh well,nobody's perfect.
@Wayner7110 күн бұрын
I had a TAFE library manager who was a female version of Henry VIII.
@JudielFua18 күн бұрын
Basis of Anglican Church
@johnny.36939 күн бұрын
Another example of the demented British monarchy.
@rezh.619318 күн бұрын
Where was Jesus?
@MichaelTheophilus90618 күн бұрын
They left him behind in 381 A.D.
@sheilafoster621318 күн бұрын
He told him to hang on in there
@kathygoulden292513 күн бұрын
Meaning?
@chrikeel18 күн бұрын
VII is not the Roman numeral for eight. It's seven.
@Ian-mj4pt18 күн бұрын
Where do you see that vi?
@justmillenialthings18 күн бұрын
An*
@judithrichards608518 күн бұрын
Jewish also,....I think that an Abbott was the head monk 🤔 Poor chap 😢🇬🇧
@queenslander77568 күн бұрын
Royalty and religion, two evils we could well do without.
@milsub5918 күн бұрын
He is the reason we should get rid of the Monarchy , for good.
@markl467018 күн бұрын
Completely agree. How people still believe in it, staggers me.
@milsub5917 күн бұрын
@@markl4670 Because the masses are thick , and are programmed to grovel.
@cambs018116 күн бұрын
We did. A hundred years later. It didn't work out, so they came back.
@maxwild121216 күн бұрын
@@cambs0181 Having a theocratic dictatorship is not the only alternative to having a monarchy, though. Nor is it what anyone who wants to get rid of the monarchy today would propose.
@Eric-jo8uh17 күн бұрын
It’s 2025, not too much has changed.
@Cromwells_Wart16 күн бұрын
Being publicly disembowelled whilst still alive isn't very common these days.
@resnonverba1377 күн бұрын
'Hung, NOT, 'hanged'.
@ngreen31518 күн бұрын
Our new Henry the 8th .... Kia Stazi!
@adamcapstick66693 күн бұрын
"AN" 80 year old monk
@heliotropezzz33317 күн бұрын
It sounds like what Trump would like to do if he could get away with it.
@glennhumphries944416 күн бұрын
Please, see a doctor.
@heliotropezzz33316 күн бұрын
@glennhumphries9444 Trump's the one that needs to see a doctor. He's clearly unwell.
@telsurrey115 күн бұрын
Surely, Biden is the one with dementia.
@waynedyer765114 күн бұрын
I suggest you see a psychiatrist you have Trump syndrome derangement!!! @@heliotropezzz333
@carlosxang805717 күн бұрын
A maldade desse homem, não era diferente dos demais monarcas da época.
@VALERIAN-p9l14 күн бұрын
Shamefull history. Disgusting.
@ianmayes807217 күн бұрын
'Drawn' should be 'drew' in your headline.
@SamSung-u5k7 күн бұрын
Hung not hanged
@vivienpla688511 күн бұрын
Off the subject, be you have to wonder what Henry would have done, if back then he knew that men determined the sex of the child and not women,
@davidmccabe840215 күн бұрын
A person is hung, drawn and quartered not hanged. It’s the only time you use hung. Sorry put me off straight away.
@paules343716 күн бұрын
Grammar violation. It's "Hanged, DREW< and quartered." The simply past of "draw" is "drew." "Drawn" is the past participle requiring a helping/auxiliary verb, like 'had".
@paules343716 күн бұрын
@@edwardjantyndorf4174 You would be right IF that was the form of the original post. But the original used ACTION verbs: How Henry Hanged, Drawn (Drew) and Quartered. We are used to the passive construction of that famous phrase, which uses the auxiliary form "was" and so you're right if we construct it that way, but that it NOT how it was originally posted. Consider the simple past tense of those verbs in another context: The Sheriff HANGED the villain, DREW a picture, and QUARTERED him up. You wouldn't say "The Sheriff hanged, drawn a picture and quartered him.. As I said "Drawn" is the past participle that requires the auxiliary verb. If it doesn't have that, then it's a simple action verb in the past tense, and the past tense of "Draw" is "drew." That said, I'm sure it sounds odd because it's almost always constructed: "The King had him hanged, drawn, and quartered." But again, that's the auxiliary verb form. The other oddity is that, for some reason, we say, "People are hanged; pictures are hung." I have no idea why that's a "rule" except perhaps as a teacher one would not want to say, "Thomas More was HUNG." At some points students know what THAT means! : )
@edwardjantyndorf417416 күн бұрын
@paules3437 I understand.
@dac545j16 күн бұрын
Draw means pull, here ... as in draw the curtains: pull them together. So drawn is the simple past of draw because it is not a picture being drawn, but a body being pulled/stretched.
@paules343715 күн бұрын
@@dac545j Drawn is not the simple past. It is the past participle. "Drew" is still the simple past of "draw." Example: I dunked my t-shirt into a vat of dye, and when I DREW it out, it was a different color.. No native speaker would say, "I dunked my t-shirt into a vat of dye and when I DRAWN it out, it was a different color." You can see the same concept in the word "Withdraw" in its past tense. "I injured myself and so I withdrew from the tournament." No one would say "I withdrawn myself." Now, if you use the auxiliary/helping verb (some form of "to be"), you might say, "My objection was withdrawn," but that's a different construction. As I've said before, when you use a helping verb, you use the past participle "drawn" but the original sentence didn't do that. It tried to use the simple last but used it incorrectly. From Merriam-Webster: "Another analyst at the New York investment bank drew attention over the summer by arguing AI isn’t solving the complex problems that would justify its costs." -Matt O’Brien and Sarah Parvini, Los Angeles Times, 1 Jan. 2025 AI Overview The past tense of the verb "draw" is "drew": Explanation: "Draw" is an irregular verb, so it doesn't add "-ed" to form the past tense. "Drawed" is not considered standard English. Example: "The free party in the park drew a tremendous crowd on Saturday". Here are some other conjugations of the verb "draw": Present participle: Drawing Past participle: Drawn
@mikeoglen684815 күн бұрын
@@paules3437 What about my suggestion on "hungen, drewn and quarterized"?
@olbucky941312 күн бұрын
I thought Greensleeves was nice.
@lesliegries862514 күн бұрын
"How .... Hanged, Drew [or Had Drawn] ..... an 80 yr. ....." You're welcome.
@keithandreetti854516 күн бұрын
'Hanged, DREW and quartered'
@dac545j16 күн бұрын
Au contraire, Blackader
@GodfreyTempleton16 күн бұрын
I think it should read 'hung, drew and quartered'.
@markstevenson663516 күн бұрын
De-limbed, not quartered if you'd like to be consistent in your quest for accuracy.
@GodfreyTempleton15 күн бұрын
@@markstevenson6635 No, English language.
@mikeoglen684815 күн бұрын
What about "hungen, drewn and quarterized?
@GodfreyTempleton15 күн бұрын
@@mikeoglen6848 Sounds German
@DanBeech-ht7sw15 күн бұрын
Farthinged?
@philleasthouse379116 күн бұрын
In your content description, try using recognized gramnar!!! How Henry V111 HUNG DREW AND QUARTERED AN 80 YEAR OLD MONK not the mishmash of unconnected incomprehensible random words you utilized.