Willow - Dempsey Bryk & Ruby Cruz on the family feeling on set, stunt fighting & keeping the heart

[@tiltedmacha]

Ruby's voice is sooo soothing..

[@chantaljansenvanvuuren3054]

Absolutely ruby voice absolutely amazing beautiful definitely can't wait to see ruby and Dempsey playing twins again in season 2 ❤❤❤Love you ruby

[@SMac86]

Looking forward to seeing their characters develope over the journey.

[@Hannah-wo9qf]

I can’t wait for the twins!

[@kaos2699]

Da man haha LoL Match ever after endlessly on my big toe and 0:55

[@blakerackley8874]

The actors didn't have a history with growing up having watched the film, and apparently the creators of the show didn't either. What an absolute travesty to the legacy of the film.

[@AcePotato_]

Tony Revolori and Amar Chadha-Patel have a history with Willow. (They play two characters). Warwick is Willow. Jon is a huge fan. Ron Howard who directed the first is executive producer and helped. You don't like the sequel series? Then just move along it.

[@blakerackley8874]

@@AcePotato_ The actors (other than Sorcia and Willow) were not in the original, so you're wrong. And KZbin is where I'm able to voice my grievances so don't white night for the show by bullying people into "moving along it".

[@shielam.1635]

From Ron Howard himself - This is not nostalgia. It’s using the fundamentals of this world, these characters, but it’s very forward thinking in terms of it's sensibilities and the adventure it creates.

[@AcePotato_]

@@blakerackley8874 If you think just saying that is white knighting your sense of internet and discussions is horrible skewed. Let me start over "The actors didn't have a history". What do you say then about Episodes 1-3 in Star Wars? Where its basically 'recast/younger casting' already existing characters. What your basically saying is you only want the original cast, which basically is dwelling in nostalgia. Its basically the 7-9 Star Wars trilogy now. (Personal opinions on that aside). 'Having a history' in literally every single interview of the cast is in meaning of 'have u grown up on it'. That's why my answer so in casting credits list, yeah I'm wrong. If we talk about "how does the new cast lean into it" I'm right. (Language is a fun thing I know). You can definitely show you grievance of it, I'm not saying that you can't. Its just your place, underneath an interview, is a bit tactless. Go grieve under the original trailer or a bigger interview with more views, can't say people will be nice then though. That's the move along. Why waste the time under an interview, why not go and do that under a reaction channel. Maybe there you will find more like minded people.

[@blakerackley8874]

@@AcePotato_ You claim to know language.. how exactly? And why is that relevant to the issues I had with the show? Also, where did I say my opinion of the show was based on the cast not being the original? I refuting your claim that "Tony Revolori and Amar Chadha-Patel have a history with Willow. (They play two characters)." This is not true, they are only in the new version. My issue is that the actors admit they never watched the original film, therefore showing little appreciation for the source material. Ron Howard being an executive producer does not mean he had any hands on influence over the story itself. Do you know what an executive producer even does? You can continue to try and shame people to only discuss their issues about the show with "like-minded" people; but regardless of that tactic, I am not going to be bullied into going where you want me to go to discuss all of this😁. btw.."horrible skewed" does not demonstrate an understanding of the English language. If you're going to make such claims, be sure to spell-check your work.