Welp, goodbye. We all greatly appreciate your sacrifice
@Hapasan8082 жыл бұрын
Oil companies are not going to come after someone who built inefficient backyard AC inverter that runs on 12 volts, when you can buy much more efficient AC inverter that runs on 12 volts at Wal Mart.
@viporal78982 жыл бұрын
@@Hapasan808 Wow, are indefinite articles not a thing for you?
@soeren86522 жыл бұрын
@@Hapasan808 You know what happened to the last guy who built a water car?
@psycheadfuzzfreak8302 жыл бұрын
Bro this why we’re scared to speak the truth cuz people like you keep this stupid paradigm that if we speak truth we automatically get killed🤦🏽♂️🤦🏽♂️ bro u ain’t helping at all 🤦🏽♂️🤦🏽♂️
@Owsryudie2 жыл бұрын
@@soeren8652 I know still people who builds them and are alive. If they come in a news, they will get fkd :D
@henknoordermeer2 жыл бұрын
Great job. You just created a battery powered generator, using hydrogen as intermediary carrier. Would be way easier and more efficient to convert the 12vdc to 110vac with an inverter! This thing will only run as long as the battery is able to power the electrolysis.
@faustojoselopez26562 жыл бұрын
How about charging the battery with an alternator.??
@borshardsd2 жыл бұрын
@@faustojoselopez2656 uhmmmm did you just discover free energy before everyone else?
@plonkster2 жыл бұрын
@@faustojoselopez2656 Alternators are not that efficient. Even if we assumed the rest of the setup is (which it isn't). The alternator would take more power from the engine than it makes, so the battery will still run dead. These small engines usually don't have an alternator. They have a magnet on the flywheel that passes by a nearby coil to produce a small charge current, just enough to power the ignition and recharge what the starter took out of the battery. 2 Ampere max if I recall.
@faustojoselopez26562 жыл бұрын
@@plonkster The energy is in the Hydrogen. This is not new. In the 70’s Meyer drove from LA to NY in a tank of water. He died soon after. It is a dangerous undertaking pardon the pun.
@plonkster2 жыл бұрын
@@faustojoselopez2656 Actually no. The energy is not so much in the hydrogen as it is in the reaction between hydrogen and oxygen. A certain amount of measurable energy is released when you let those two react. But in order to get the hydrogen, you need energy to split them. The process only works if you get more energy out than you put in... and that's the one thing that has not been shown, in fact it downright contradicts everything we know about physics. That doesn't mean it is wrong (well, it probably does, but I mean on a philosophical level it would not), it just means you need to prove your results very very meticulously. Even if there was no tomfoolery in this video -- which I doubt -- that engine is still not making enough electrical energy to recharge that small 18Ah battery. Which means the entire process essentially runs from the small 12V battery...
@heftypuffer7230 Жыл бұрын
This is awesome, please do an update on maintenance. Like when to change the water, or when to change the stainless steel
@michaelbisnett48457 ай бұрын
I love these demonstrations, they show real proof of concept. I am an engineer and have been out of school for almost 40 years so my analytical prowess has been lost or forgotten. So one of you young engineers, or non-engineers, please follow this up with a complete mass and energy balance and set the boundaries of the analysis around all of the inputs and outputs of this system. Do the same for the system if it were run with water and gasoline and lets see where entropy takes us.
@davidsmith37367 ай бұрын
Depends on the engine.
@allanegan65026 ай бұрын
Stationary engines, no mass to move, just a small piston, look promising BUT the World longs for the ICE replacement. Thus the EV evolution. But we hav GAS Cars now, LPG & Hydrogen cars. So let's take a look. U bubble a little hydrogen thru a bank of 1, 2, 5L 'generators' feed thru a modified carby & off u go. So what's producing the energy to break down the water? Yep that's an embarrassing Q. Next let's look at a working existing H. car. Large tanks under enough pressure to turn H. into liquid and then run for about 1 std tank of petrol, say 500k. Typically 2 or 3 tanks. How much pressure? north of 500 atmospheres. So a bank of bubbling H. gas generators moves a 1 ton car, just like the commercial H. gas tanks. AND Big Auto has hidden, lied to, killed to stop these bubble makers going commercial in small to mid sized vehicles ?? Bless ur '24
@tubekrake5 ай бұрын
I am sure, they just use Wodka or something else that looks like Water.
@radekdokoupil57064 ай бұрын
@@davidsmith3736 Unfortunately depends on the math and physic. And both are non compromise. Output energy is input energy times efficiency. Nothing else. So easy it is.
@sidPalma2 жыл бұрын
Daily Dose of Internet sent me
@Chris-hr8yz2 жыл бұрын
Also me
@macslimehill75402 жыл бұрын
Same here
@zmartusers33962 жыл бұрын
Same
@youtubeisproCCP2 жыл бұрын
yes
@MRCDF72 жыл бұрын
me
@totalpm2 жыл бұрын
I ran my car for 10 years off a hydrogen generator in my engine. Gas milage was double, power up 10%, mechanic complained the engine was too clean to be old, everytime the engine ran it made its own gas up to 3 litres a minute. More gas, less fuel required and no emissions out the exhaust. It's better than electric because I still towed my 3T trailer around the country without fail.
@pedrold2 жыл бұрын
Awesome! Congratulations for reaching that goal!
@totalpm2 жыл бұрын
@@asifyousfi2783 no, diesel still used combined with hydrogen. The difference is I got twice the milage out one tank of diesel with hydrogen fed in to the air intake from the hydro generator powered by the battery. Diesel waste non existent expelled out of the exhaust. The vehicle only used the diesel it needed. The engine ran much smoother as well like a petrol engine. Very clean combustion.
@samjohnson31242 жыл бұрын
so, where can I get some of the critical components? I know Potassium Hydroxide has been used as an electrolyte, but I dont know if this one has been doped with anything special. Im looking to build my own for our 3 cars, If you have any pointers you are willing to give, I would appreciate it.
@totalpm2 жыл бұрын
@@samjohnson3124 hardware store has it all, or buy a ready made kit. USA have them ready plug and play for around $400
@totalpm2 жыл бұрын
@@samjohnson3124 the parts in this video is available off the shelf in a hardware store.
@harrylippitz397822 күн бұрын
This is a really interesting video. I have watched it several times and cannot see the hidden petrol fuel pipe that feeds the engine. But we have only seen the generator from one side. That which I do see: if the bubbles in the right-hand tube each have a volume of about 1 cubic cm, 3 per second = 180cc of gas per minute. That means it is producing 1 litre of gas every five minutes. Given that the motor is around 200cc (probably more) then the engine can only do 1 RPM. It needs to about 1000x that figure to be real. So I take my hat off to Hidden Technology for a really well-made perpetual motion video that looks really convincing, if one does not question the numbers (or where that blooming fuel pipe is hidden).
@joerancourt2908 Жыл бұрын
Keep up the good work guys! I have been saying for years that alternative energy sources are possible but are suppressed due to the greed in mens hearts. If I ever reproduce one of these amazing devices I will spread the knowledge underground for the good of all
@tacoterpstra8263 Жыл бұрын
female talking about technology xd
@wagnergauer91332 ай бұрын
You could also make a lot of money from it
@danielgeroy42202 жыл бұрын
Beautiful! Totally legit, especially when in the final test the HH+ water tank doesn't loose liquid at all and stays full. What an efficiency! And the motor keeps producing the same power the whole time - in the beginning when is hit with so much initial hydrogen (and doesn't explode) and even later when just small bubbles are produced in the second tank, just amazing! There is no way a secret tank is mounted and if someone says otherwise screw him - haters gonna hate! This is not like the other video from this channel with the DVD solar panel with batteries in the support, no nothing like that! ...... But just to be sure I'll stick with the Stanley Meyers patents.
@NugChannel2 жыл бұрын
Impossible. Process when H atoms pulled out of H2O molecules, it changes water into gas. This technology will leave far future generations without water. Literally. This must be stopped.
@rbetts22992 жыл бұрын
Nice I need one
@billkichman77702 жыл бұрын
All that means, is that the battery output (temporarily) is capable of supplying more gas than the engine needs. As the battery slowly depletes its charge (despite some charge from the engine's charger) the gas level will rise to liquid.
@tonymeman84052 жыл бұрын
Yeah. Doesn't even consume water. It runs on the energy of hopes and dreams! =)
@gregwarrener48482 жыл бұрын
@@billkichman7770 yes if it took a gallon of gas to go 10 ft i suppose you could say the same thing for a gas engine. the efficiency is what is key here. We are using water to get (more miles per kw) in a sense which is why the water engine is becoming more practical.
@linuswulff032 жыл бұрын
Oh wow! HH+ is either so efficient at separating water that it breaks the first law of thermodynamics! That or its all powered by the battery in an incredibly inefficient way
@friendless37682 жыл бұрын
I have not studied this and have no experience in it I am just wondering how it breaks this rule? Thanks
@themightysalamence98702 жыл бұрын
I agree with the comment above and am wondering how it breaks the rules
@aaronfield78992 жыл бұрын
@@friendless3768 He's being sarcastic. Of course it doesn't break the 1st law of thermodynamics it's just being very inefficient since he could just use the battery instead to power his angle grinder.
@freekboy6582 жыл бұрын
@@friendless3768 It takes more energy to split water into hydrogen and oxygen than you get back by burning the hydrogen.
@billkichman77702 жыл бұрын
Yeah, they put together an arrangement with 2 things going at once, one adding to the system, one depleting, with a small difference being the loss in efficiency, that stretches the observed result out in time that it satisfies the con.
@justinwhalley31233 ай бұрын
The fact that this technology lives as an obscure video on the Internet while an engineered energy crisis is being carried out all the world tells you everything about the state of humanity.
@ulrichisenberg6362 Жыл бұрын
Habe das schon vor 1 Jahren getestet, funktioniert einwandfrei. Getestet bei einem Westfalia Benzingenerator.
@renelaplanche72012 ай бұрын
Ça fonctionne combien de semaines ?🎉
@MassageWithKlay2 жыл бұрын
The biggest difference between this and what Stanley Meyers did, is that he didn't use DC in order to separate the water. He used AC, at very high voltage and very low amperage which made his system very efficient. The AC was set to the right frequency to separate the water. This is why he stated that he could put any water into the tank and have it run, as there was no need for any additives. As for those who say that method is impossible, get a copy of Nikola Tesla's Colorado Diary and also a copy of The Problem of Increasing Human Energy, in there you'll find an experiment which Tesla did where he basically aggravated Nitrogen to a state where it was able to combust through a spark. He says that the explosion was about 50-70 feet in diameter. Not too bad for an inert gas. You can still attain most of Stanley Meyers patents online, as not only did he do the process of producing high amounts of hydrogen from any form of water, he also gave plans for hydrogen injectors with anti-drawback and a measure of other safety features to ensure that when doing the process, you don't end up making a massive explosion. The whole concept of what Stanley Meyers did came from the fact that his home town ran completely out of fuel and he wanted to make a way to which anyone who has a decent backyard machine shop would be able to convert their cars over to running on water. Remember that nothing is truly impossible, sometimes it's improbable and more often it's the definition of insanity where you try anything over and over again expecting different results. It's only when you do something different can the impossible seem plausible.
@Ken-rk3by2 жыл бұрын
OKAY, you know so much about how Stanley did it, build one.
@johnhamilton90982 жыл бұрын
Uhh..WRONG. He used a pulsed DC….His way was with resonance. Stick your hand INTO Meyers demo units and you would die if it was not pulsed DC.
@Ken-rk3by2 жыл бұрын
@@johnhamilton9098 So who are you sending your comments to, me or Klay because I know that you have to run DC through the HHO.??
@charlidog22 жыл бұрын
@@Ken-rk3by Why do you have to run DC? The principle stays the same, especially if your anode and cathode are the same material. I think. Drop an extension cord in a bucket. It makes bubbles. Though that might be from boiling which is different. Electronics guy needed in aisle 5. In general the output would be less because it's not using constant peak voltage. If the frequency makes up for that I don't know.
@Ken-rk3by2 жыл бұрын
@@charlidog2 -- If you use AC current all the plates on both sides would be trying to form hydrogen and oxygen at the same time and apparently, it won't work. Besides, you would have to have an inverter to supply AC in a vehicle putting even more strain on the charging system than just running DC. The other problem would be keeping it cool, in essence, you just made a kettle. Also, the chances of arcing between the plates, if it did produce HHO gas it would make it too dangerous to be near it
@John-gz8tf2 жыл бұрын
Congratulations on creating an engine that defies the laws of thermodynamics! I'm sure scientists around the world are in awe of your brilliance!
@holgerkirschbaum69112 жыл бұрын
100% agreed. What I don’t understand why he spends so much time and efforts for such a BS……
@paulbriggs30722 жыл бұрын
It would be impossible if the splitting of water took the amount of energy that it is thought. But Stan Meyer many years ago showed it could be split with far less energy than thought.
@jean-michelnefontaine92562 жыл бұрын
Ils savent déjà ça depuis longtemps, mais ce serait faire tomber l'économie mondiale
@TechieTard2 жыл бұрын
@@holgerkirschbaum6911 Maybe you aren't paying 8 dollars per gallon of gasoline.
@TechieTard2 жыл бұрын
@@paulbriggs3072 Stanley used harmonics/frequency to split the bonds. Something nobody is doing.
@UncleJimsTarot11 ай бұрын
Asking the same as a lot of other people. How long will the core last, and how long will it run on a single fill of water? I'd love to put this on a boat for overnighting and house power.
@sashragesh8 ай бұрын
An fire arrestor is needed because hydrogen is highly explosive, increasing the chances of an explosion.
@igorrrr452477 ай бұрын
Better off using a battery
@julianbryantjbАй бұрын
With this built out at scale so much could be saved in the hands of consumers! Houston could be helped in such a huge way!
@rocky67032 жыл бұрын
Well it was nice that he shared this with the world. He'll be missed RIP.
@Q50Eric2 жыл бұрын
His head in 24 hours 🤯
@p.p.a.p7622 жыл бұрын
yeh i found a story about a guy created a waterpowered car and was killed
@JOwaky2 жыл бұрын
2.2 milion people gonna die
@CannaKen2 жыл бұрын
@@p.p.a.p762 exactly!
@NoonNoon_Kid2 жыл бұрын
Download the video so there is still evidence left
@hxx38152 жыл бұрын
Hey guys: remember. Hidden Technology didn't have depression, had no thoughts of contemplating suicide, had a great life/career, and is healthy in all aspects with great security.
@gugomajo41612 жыл бұрын
ok, and?
@hxx38152 жыл бұрын
@@gugomajo4161 Just so that he doesn't mysteriously disappear because of him making an actual way to be powered by water. Just look at Stanley Meyer.
@dabdaddyjosh2 жыл бұрын
Stay Halal brother 🙏
@sabertoothanimations2912 Жыл бұрын
Hey so I'm curious, How long do you think this Generator will run on the water you give it and how long would you say you can use it before you have to de-rust or replace the electrolysis core? I would love to Build one of these for long-term use, but would like to know what your opinion is on that and if you have any other suggestions or concerns for using it as a pretty continuous power source. I saw a place recently that converted a 650cc motorcycle to one of these, i would love to make a small car or something like a motorcycle at the least run like this.
@adambennett65811 ай бұрын
He hasn't removed the possibility of this system running from battery power in such short tests. I'm not saying it is or isn't, just would be nice to see and know 7AF
@tarheelcountry18684 ай бұрын
Never de rust it. The corrosion layer protects metal underneath! That goes for EVERYTHING!
@sabertoothanimations29124 ай бұрын
@@tarheelcountry1868 Well i would love to try this and see how much power ya get for what it puts out with fuel, if i find a generator to use, i might run some long power tests and see what i get
@hn1685 Жыл бұрын
Your device is splendid. In a Japanese company, I thought that it was Toushiba, but I distributed oxygen and hydrogen at the time of hydrogen generating and thought about a method to leave oxygen unattended in the air. Very safe. I am older age of Japan, but I make a team with the elderly person of the cause engineer and want to produce it for the world. I want to learn a detailed thing. I do not understand an electrolyte well, but the eldest son leaves the chemical course at a university. Also, my car uses gasoline to generate electricity, which is then used in the motor to run. Comfortable.
@DrBTStm Жыл бұрын
study proton water exchange membrane water electrolysis process you will know more about what he did
@igmusimba2 жыл бұрын
HHO fuel is not a new concept. Our chemistry teacher taught us this 50 years ago in junior high school. The problem is what to do about the eventual corrosion in existing internal combustion engines. Lead in gasoline was originally used to lubricate engine parts (especially the valves). An instructor 40 years ago told me this might be useful in the future when they can make pistons (combustion engines) out of ceramics (no corrosion issues). I still think Hydrogen Fuel Cell, direct to electricity is probably a better solution, but this is a nice video none the less. There really is no secret here. It just is not sustainable with current internal combustion engines that were designed for fossil fuels.
@HiddentechnologyYT2 жыл бұрын
Yes, the corrosion looks like a potential problem in the long term. I think the problem here were the corks, but we should definitely look for ceramics.
@willi7032 жыл бұрын
Dear Guys, good show. Yes 50 years ago i also learnt the electrolysis of water. A massive bang in the science lab. Ok. You example is a 4 stroke petroleum engine. My question to you is. Would the HHO system work on a diesel engine that has been converted to natural gas.? Kind regards. Bill.
@harrywalker58362 жыл бұрын
lpg, is the go.. my bronco been on lpg for 14 yrs. 12.1 compression, timing, goes like a cut cat..
@zachsheffee84582 жыл бұрын
@@HiddentechnologyYT You should sell that device online!! Trades people would love it!! Some people would be able to use it for there cars!! You should sell a plan! A how to build one yourself guide!! Maybe even a kit with instructions/warnings. So people could buy the kit & build one themselves!! So even more people could afford to have this technology!! Thank you.
@amrendramishra5452 жыл бұрын
@@zachsheffee8458 absolutely right
@santiklingo2 жыл бұрын
RIP to this guy
@iwannabeawitch2 жыл бұрын
What happened to him?
@santiklingo2 жыл бұрын
@@iwannabeawitch LMAO he hasnt died it was a reference to stanley meyer
@iwannabeawitch2 жыл бұрын
@@santiklingo oh fuck 💀💀💀💀 ig we just wait and see what happens to him
@clintoncook8086Ай бұрын
I have to say I am incredibly impressed by this video. The ability to hide the fuel line is very well done. Should really consider a career in movie special effects
@zn_army_56 Жыл бұрын
Awesome invention never seen before ❤❤❤ Keep doing bro May Allah bless you 💖❤
@mickmccluand46772 жыл бұрын
I had been pondering about the correct AFR for running hydrogen instead of petrol. Turns out half covering your intake is about right.
@billkichman77702 жыл бұрын
Hydrogen is the smallest element on the periodic table, and is nigh impossible to contain. I don't understand why so many people get all up in a bunch, interested in using hydrogen for engines. It isn't a fuel so much as it's a fuel can. And a leaky one at that.
@watewmark2 жыл бұрын
@@billkichman7770 Maybe because we are burning all the petrol avaible in crappy "Wish" furniture and that we need to find alternative solutions. Hydrogen will never run out as you mentioned it is the simplest atom. and that running engines with a basic water electrolysis is so simple that just any college student could make it safely ?
@gonzaloayalaibarre2 жыл бұрын
@@billkichman7770 It's interesting because the raw materials for getting hydrogen are readily available, the methods are pretty straightforward and the oxidation products are harmless. We are having trouble storing excess electricity, so of course people look to water electrolysis. As you said, it also offers major complications, but you can't blame people for being interested. This video, however, is just plain silliness. Why would anyone want to use a battery to power water electrolysis that will be immediately oxydized is beyond me.
@MrCharlesfire2 жыл бұрын
@@gonzaloayalaibarre "This video, however, is just plain silliness. Why would anyone want to use a battery to power water electrolysis that will be immediately oxydized is beyond me." When you don't have an electric engine available, this is a less efficient alternative I guess...
@JBrimBloodG2 жыл бұрын
@@billkichman7770 i guess the hindenburg never existed then
@superwassou2 жыл бұрын
I would be glad to have a list with all tools, parts and others to complete this amazing project.
@cmanna2852 жыл бұрын
Yeah! how can we get this list?
@SushiCat03162 жыл бұрын
same here, i want the list of the items too... maybe i can find a way to make it more effective
@ivan56042 жыл бұрын
Watch the video he puts the names of all the parts used and the tools used shouldn’t be very hard to identify. So far I’ve seen him use an angle grinder, a vise, and a drill press.
@boomster22322 жыл бұрын
don't forget the batterie :)
@Kyle-xk2rb2 жыл бұрын
Hey, hijacking this comment so more people are aware. This channel promotes scams so be careful clicking any links on this channel! Also many of these comments are from bots. Thanks!
@tarabya1001 Жыл бұрын
I have a few questions, while hydrogen production was fine at the beginning of the video, the production decreased a lot towards the end of the video at 17:55 26:05. what is the reason of this ?
@cyberlife4177 Жыл бұрын
thermodinamics
@Hunty499 ай бұрын
Things I would like to know: * Torque of the motor running on petrol vs hydrogen. * Amperage required for the electrolysis to create the hydrogen * Would a petrol/hydrogen hybrid work? (petrol with hydrogen boosted) * Type of water (distilled, sea water, drinking water etc) Great experiment :)
@heinzpg9 ай бұрын
Your questions are not relevant since a combustion engine can't be run by water. This video is BS.
@Hunty499 ай бұрын
@@heinzpg It's not run by water. It's using electrolysis to seperate H2 and O. Then burning hydrogen. Rockets boosters are hydrogen. Have you tried reading? It's how you can get information.
@heinzpg9 ай бұрын
@@Hunty49 I am quite aware that hydrogen obtained by electrolysis is seen here as possible fuel! But it is still outright impossible to run a car this way! Sorry, I feel it is you who needs additional informations and I can give them. Why can't you run a car this way? First of all, the production of hydrogen by electrolysis consumes more energy than the produced hydrogen can deliver. Second, the electrical energy for the electrolysis is supposed to be produced by a generator, driven by the hydrogen combustion motor. Both of them are not 100% efficient, this can't work out. In numbers: For one unit of electrical power you get perhaps 0.7 units of hydrogen power. The mechanical output of a hydrogen combustion engine with this hydrogen input power will be around 0.3 units. If you use this mechanical power to drive the generator you will get 0.25 units of electrical power, which can not substitute the 1.0 which are needed for the hydrogen production. And your car hasn't even moved, it only turned the generator ... They claim here they found "secret additives" to make electrolysis more efficient. I don't believe that crap, and efficiency can never be over 100% anyway. This video is a click bait, and it is not the first one of this sort.
@JoshyMade2 жыл бұрын
I’ve ran my body on water and variations of water based liquids for 38 years. Works great!
@bl83882 жыл бұрын
And we provide free gas after eating beans!
@vivekawasthi48082 жыл бұрын
Mine is however sometimes demands a lot of alcohol with water😭😭😭😭
@kkmullin2 жыл бұрын
I failed the emissions test!
@Mrkittinsgaming Жыл бұрын
Nothing like snorting coke to get me going
@adamsachinis49996 ай бұрын
helps with the combination @@vivekawasthi4808
@davidg45122 жыл бұрын
More energy is required to separate the bond of hydrogen and oxygen than you can get out of it via combustion. Combustion has its own loses. If there is a working model of this, the catch will always be that the battery makes up the difference of the energy loss. Once the battery runs out, it will stall as the entire process is a max of 30% efficient.
@billkichman77702 жыл бұрын
Exactly. The efficiencies multiply, to total lower values. Maybe 0.85 for the generator x 0.3 for the dirty engine, x 0.9 battery charging, x whatever the hydrolysis is...very low number in the end.
@desertegle40cal2 жыл бұрын
Hey David, So can you explain to me what process you’d have to take to keep using the water, please? You sound like you know what your talking about and this video, although amazing, doesn’t explain what he is doing and what process he is taking to get energy output from simple H2O for people that don’t know what he is doing, like me lol. So would you have to run gas, charge the battery, then run water to save gas until the battery runs out, then run gas again? I am a super lay person in this regard. Could at the very least this process save you on gas or is using water to power a generator just wishful thinking? Also, why is that water turning red in that chamber? It was just water with like salt or something wasn’t it? In the left chamber.
@josidasilva55152 жыл бұрын
Instead of electrolysis, use ionization PWM with water spray (car ignition with PWM on the 12 VDC side and water through a carburator). 10kV, 3 kHz.
@itsafluke65742 жыл бұрын
From what I can tell, all water engines need a second input to work. Wether that be sodium, some type of chemical, heat, all that, anything that works doesn't use just water alone. A gas engine takes a small amount of electricity and then continues on by itself making up that loss of electricity. The challenge here is basicaly how to get a water engine that does the same. Now why we don't just have hydrogen based engines and facilities that make hydrogen and replace the gas at gas stations I have no idea. It would be the single most easy way to switch to a more renewable form of energy other than electric.
@cozmoknot2 жыл бұрын
Don’t underestimate it so quickly, with time, this will possibly be one of the greatest inventions of mankind. So what if it’s only 30% efficiency, the first computers were the size of rooms, now they fit in your hand.
@TIGERZY2K9 ай бұрын
This water based portable generator set deserves to be commercialized ASAP in order to retire the carbon emmitting old gasoline based generators from the consumer electronics market.
@exurbian24206 күн бұрын
this is pretty misleading. the thermodynamics of the water engine just don't work out. you use electricity to split water into hydrogen and oxygen, then use the hydrogen as combustible fuel for the engine. but in reality all that is happening is taking apart a water molecule and putting it back together (the combustion of H2 and O2 in the atmosphere just produces water). there is no change of state that allows for extraction of chemical energy from the original water molecules. yes the engines are running, yes it is off of hydrogen produced from water. but all of the energy itself comes from the electrical input, not the water. this is just a less efficient electric motor.
@him892 күн бұрын
I was going to say the amount being produced around the 23 minute mark is almost nothing and couldn't keep that generator running at 1000rpm. but doing some math then finding out the stoichiometric AFR for hydrogen is 34:1 does make this seem plausible.
@randomcitizen39392 жыл бұрын
Aww snaps.... Daily Dose hooked me up with a amazing video. Thanks for sharing your work man.
@drac_frost2 жыл бұрын
same
@Owsryudie2 жыл бұрын
Me too, I knew this was a thing already i cars.
@chiefrunningfist2 жыл бұрын
You still gotta come up with the energy to split the water molecule in the first place, so utilizing water as a "fuel" (sourcing H2 via electrolysis) is not any more of an efficient power source than the initial electricity required/used/needed to split the water in the first place (ie you have to use electricity to get H2O to separate it into its H2 & O2 parts; 100% of electrical energy in = ~80% the amount of oxidation/combustion energy out). Though imo H2 provides for an interesting excess energy storage idea. (storing excess as a gas vs traditional battery solutions), but water isn't really the fuel source here (it's H2). Splitting water up (electrolysis), and then putting it back together (oxidation of H2 gas), over and over again. 1. Electrolysis (splitting into parts): 2[H2O] = 2[H2] + 1[O2] 2. Combustion (putting back together): 2[H2] +1[O2] = 2[H2O] 3. Repeat.
@axel7082 жыл бұрын
That's my takeaway here as well. The engineering is impressive but the fuel source is the HH+ added in. Also, the longevity is questionable given the rods corroding at the start.
@DonoVideoProductions2 жыл бұрын
@@axel708 The resulting corroded sludge in the electrolysis chamber is very toxic. It produces hexavalent chromate, which must be disposed of at designated hazardous waste sites - there are severe penalites for not disposing of it properly. Not to mention it causes severe skin reactions, and evtually cancer. I do not think this is a good trade-off for petrol by any stretch.
@crowangel4992 жыл бұрын
@@DonoVideoProductions can you expand on this whole sludge please?, in realetion on how much worse than CO2?
@axel7082 жыл бұрын
@@DonoVideoProductions that could be reduced or even resolved by using higher grade SS such as 316 or 316L. He states in the video that the carbon oxidising was leading to the sludge you mentioned.
@gohighhustle2 жыл бұрын
Yes, but it's still an alternative to fossil fuels, isn't that what matters the most?
@LyehtOfficial Жыл бұрын
This taught me more than a school ever could lol
@riscoelduque8 сағат бұрын
Estoy viendo el vídeo después de dos años de publicado, como diría mi amigo TELIN, acabas de inventar la moda de ir andando 😂😂😂
@maryroberson95832 жыл бұрын
I would like to see you build a water system for a vehicle that actually works that anyone can build.
@kalvynhavenhill33669 ай бұрын
Working on cars isn't easy but do able. It'd definitely be a lengthy one. Considering your completely changing your combustion system from fossil to hydro wich both have different combustion systems internally in a vehicle. Idk enough to say what to change but you could keep your gas tank and just change the rest that lead up to the Injectors from what he's done. Complex but do-able
@PeteVanDemark2 жыл бұрын
Amazing how the engine keeps running even when the bubbles stop.
@guri3112 жыл бұрын
;-) That's true.
@alistairmackinnon42162 жыл бұрын
Yup, that bubbler was producing about a bubble a second.
@delansick68652 жыл бұрын
What are these bubbles?
@junimkl2 жыл бұрын
Voce queria ver o atomo? Que visão heim
@L.M17922 жыл бұрын
If you lose the bubbles you greatly increase efficiency.
@Donjo58 Жыл бұрын
Would love to see the generator react while running after turning off HHO switch.
@nour4lina11 ай бұрын
he should make the=at into a car engin
@ciberbri593 ай бұрын
At first I was skeptical but when I saw them add the secret ingredient HH+ I knew it was good science. At last we can have the energy future the human race needs so badly.
@deervideos6482 ай бұрын
Yeah, I too stopped being skeptical when the secret magic ingredient was introduced.
@MorrisonManor2 жыл бұрын
Kudos on the effort put into manufacturing this thing. I could never entertain spending this much time and money for a bit of theater.
@dantronics16822 жыл бұрын
its not just a bit of theater, his videos gets pushed up the ladder and he get monotised
@billkichman77702 жыл бұрын
or likes. or subscriptions. or the money that comes from that.
@gohighhustle2 жыл бұрын
so you're saying it's not real? Why don't you build one and prove it?
@sharrpshooter12 жыл бұрын
@@gohighhustle It doesnt work on the bases of physics alone. The energy required to for electrolysis is less than you would get from the hydrogen made, its a system that is always losing energy, and since the only energy input is the battery, its basically a joke of a video
@VladOnEarth Жыл бұрын
He is actually earning money with this theater lol.
@threeMetreJim2 жыл бұрын
Excellent, that's just what I need to keep my pet unicorn warm in winter. Will be a struggle to pay for gas this winter, at a time when there are no people venturing out to catch a glimpse of him.
@alexyap7323Ай бұрын
An discovery or an invention that sadly can never be commercialized.
@brittreid39812 жыл бұрын
Interesting that the hydrogen production seems to have dropped to nearly nothing and yet the generator continues to run strongly. Also interesting that when a load is put on the generator you don’t hear the engine change under the load.
@josephhoward29712 жыл бұрын
Well with a Octane rating of 140 or so. Those side tanks could be pressurized to the point of low bubblige. Also with the high octane rating, the genny wouldn't have to surge up much for the increased amperage's. Try running your car with 130-140+ octane fuel, I'll bet you get quite the HP boost. But the gen will not last long because of the higher engine temps....
@charlidog22 жыл бұрын
Yeah, I suggest people compare the amount of gas produced at 18:10 and 25:40. That's a significant difference, yet the motor doesn't seem to notice. I'm pretty sure it should notice. I'd like to see a graph of the temp of the HHO generator over time. And the voltage of the battery over time. The skepticism I have is based on that dastardly Conservation of Energy Law. It takes a lot of energy to break the bonds of a water molecule. And there is an enormous amount of heat from the motor. That's all being converted from something, and I'm skeptical those tiny bubbles at 25:40 contain enough energy to satisfy the equation.
@charlidog22 жыл бұрын
@@josephhoward2971 How would the HHO generator and bubbler pressurize? It isn't a closed system. There isn't a solenoid valve regulating fuel flow. There's only the carb's butterfly valve. Consider this, if what we just saw was possible, there would be HHO generators on every car. No, it's far more likely there's something we're not being shown going on here.
@1960ewe2 жыл бұрын
@@charlidog2 that is my question exactly. How much charge goes now to the battery. Wil it deplete or would the charge coil in the generator do a sufficient job keeping that battery up to charge. I wonder...
@georgesmith84012 жыл бұрын
When you run an engine using water the engine runs smoothly and quieter
@SkylerAnderson2 жыл бұрын
It's amazing how someone with zero grasp of physics has access to such an awesome machine shop.
@TrailChaser2 жыл бұрын
That's not a machine shop. He has hand tools and a simple $100 drill press.
@Brett_S_4202 жыл бұрын
Crazy how a commenter on KZbin can know who a person is despite not knowing jack about them! You must have a superpower!
@ne1cup2 жыл бұрын
you are rude and you should do some experiments with HHO yourself
@wisdomwisdom81711 ай бұрын
Remember the golden saying ( You are either part of the solution or part of the problem) . God has blessed you that you are an extraordinary person. And a blessing to humanity. I installed the same system on my vehicle and Chanelled the hydrogen gas into my intake manifold, and my gas mileage improved tremendously. This is the way of future. We pray soon .
@tiagomatrix3353 Жыл бұрын
Brother, parabéns!!!
@KomradZX19892 жыл бұрын
I’d get in the habit of checking the underside of your car with a mirror each time before you drive 😂 Amazing stuff, keep up your hard work buddy!!!
@Theresistance642 жыл бұрын
EXACTLY! He'll likely get "disappeared" soon.
@ozzierabbit5872 жыл бұрын
File this one with all the other perpetual motion devices on KZbin (which I've never seen commercially).
@georgwarhead28012 жыл бұрын
this actualy works in reallife too, the BIG problem is, that the hydrogen eats away the oilfilm in the pistons and that the engine cant run for a longer time in this conditions. ford actualy tested this for a long time, and they find it easyer to just use fuelcells.
@lordbertox40562 жыл бұрын
Hydrolisis increases entropy, so this isnt a perpetual motionmachine
@asimpleorbasicRobloxdevfrom23Ай бұрын
there is a problem... to make hydrolysis with water you need more energy than burning the hydrogen that means engines running on water are impossible.
@asimpleorbasicRobloxdevfrom23Ай бұрын
water does not have energy inside it. but fuel has.
@stevenzehler Жыл бұрын
In viewing this video, I believe I am witnessing the dawn of a new age. The water engine provides a non-compromising nexus between the interests of environmentalists and the interests of a practical world in need of real, sustainable, dependable, and safe power generation that combustion engine technology has always provided. The water engine removes the controversial polluting fuel while retaining the reliable, on-demand power generation of a combustion engine along with an inevitable concomitant ease of re-fueling; no long re-charging wait times and no dependence on sun or wind availability. The water engine clearly must be the way forward for our world at least until such time an even better solution is finally publicly demonstrated. Steven Paul Zehler Trenton, New Jersey
@reinernst82032 жыл бұрын
So you built a generator that runs on a battery. Good job. This is like shining a spotlight on a solar panel and claiming you have free electricity.
@joeyr882 жыл бұрын
Yeah then it's night time.
@hoseinqadam2 жыл бұрын
I have one problem, the amount of energy required to produce hydrogen via electrolysis is more then the energy you get back from combusting the hydrogen. Is there some secret additive that I am missing to make the hydrogen production efficient?
@winbobmarks82362 жыл бұрын
Adam, what you said about the efficiency of the process is absolutely true! That is why this is NOT a Perpetual Motion Machine. Energy from OUTSIDE the generating system is constantly needed.....The Battery. Disconnect it and the system stops. Now if he charged the Battery from the generator........🤣😱🤣
@TheCuteZombie2 жыл бұрын
@@winbobmarks8236 On point explanation. Of course solar energy can be used, but then the problem of solar dependency also comes to play, as well as low effieciency. Another thing that almost no one mentions, tho, is the fact that storing hydrogen is a problem in itself. High flamable/explosive, can escape cointainer due to metal absorbing/bubble forming, needs to be stored in high pressure due to it's low density. The risk are too high, and the fact that there are better options, like natural gas that can be made from organic matter. Of course, gas fuel in itself is more complicated than dealing with liquids.
@TheCuteZombie2 жыл бұрын
@@captainpjarker what are you talking about? No reaction know or observed thus far in human history produces more energy than the initial input. That is how entropy and the flow of time works. We don't use wind turbines or coal energy because they reaction is efficient or geneates energy from nowhere, but because they are widely available and the extraction of said energy is simple. Which is not true to hydrogen: it don't exist in high quantities and at an affordable price, the storage process is difficult and it is highly flammable/explosive. Not to mention there are better gas options than hydrogen, like i said earlier, natural gas from organic matter or biodiesel, although they can't compete with petroleum due to cost and inefficiency.
@joshuauriarte4522 жыл бұрын
@@TheCuteZombie Hydrogen is actually a lot cheaper, only problem is greed. No one has put money into a hydrogen system. hydrogen could be much more efficient and safer then any other fuel type. The only problem is that they would lose control over their money source. Once something big to refine hydrogen is made, it will try to be turned smaller due to hydrogen being one of the most abundant gases. Theres articles and studies done that proves hydrogen could be the future if we actually tried.
@captainpjarker2 жыл бұрын
@@TheCuteZombie exactly. So why are you saying this is useless? Of COURSE there’s going to be energy loss. That’s not the point. You’re focusing on the negatives instead of the actual theory. Half the people in these comments don’t know what they’re talking about and the half that do want to act like a new fuel system is a negative? How? Also, did you really just say hydrogen isn’t readily abundant? You’re joking, right? It’s LITERALLY the most abundant element in the universe, so if THATS not abundant enough, neither is coal or oil or gas. It can’t compete with petroleum?? Bro please for both our sakes stop talking out of your ass 😂 have you seen gas prices lately? 7$ for a gallon of the stuff. 5$ for a pack of 24 water bottles is a pretty high estimate. Not to mention hydrogen burns more than 50% slower than gasoline (that means it’s more than double as efficient) so don’t tell me it “can’t compete”. You have no idea what you’re talking about lmfao. Probably the only reaosn hydrogen cars aren’t more popular is because base hydrogen gas is 4x as expensive as gasoline, but that’s buying the gas straight. If you buy purified water? Not even close to the same cost for 2x as much efficiency
@aviatrix2 Жыл бұрын
I don't know what adjustments you might make on a carburetor that shouldn't have any adjustments if it were strictly HHO. Also, there appears to only be a fraction of the gas going through your flash-back to run an engine of that size. Since we can't see the carburetor, and entire setup, I doubt it's legit.
@amberandrews6842 Жыл бұрын
Hydrogen is a better fuel. You don't need as much.
@ulfcarlfinnes28205 ай бұрын
Thanks for showing us. Now we can become truly free independent people. We make our own electricity for light and heat and fuel and can also grow our own food, including green fodder, fish and rabbits. We can create our private workshop and iron foundry, etc., etc.
@BruceOrand2 жыл бұрын
Though, the electrolysis separation of water into 2 parts Hydrogen and 1 part Oxygen has been known for many years, if not isolating the anode and cathode chambers, you are producing HHO gas, or Browns Gas, not just Hydrogen. Then the 'gurgle' tank prior to engine start only bubbled 3 or 4 bubbles, and the engine took off quickly like it was already primed. Another commenter properly indicated that the stock carburetor is designed for a liquid fuel to 'draw up' the fuel jet. There would need to be a modified intake to allow the HHO to flow into the Air-Fuel chamber, and hopefully under some level of pressure or it would be insufficient to give a rich enough atmosphere to ignite the engine. Good video, but need to validate there is not another fuel source on the generator, hidden behind the power plate. Camera angles prevent the specific view to witness carburetor setup. Also HH+ powder. More detail on they 'mystery' chemical. I doubt this is made by SikaFix and their HH+ product.
@HiddentechnologyYT2 жыл бұрын
The HH+ was given to us by an anonymous subscriber. He claims to be patenting it after knowing about it. Don't know the backstory of it. We are just cautious to release too much information because so many people disappeared in the past.
@sksman712 жыл бұрын
where can a person get this HH+
@MladenKljestan2 жыл бұрын
@@HiddentechnologyYT "Many people disapeared..." just because of this we must give it to people. Secret is when "know it" less than two people. All other is "i just want money" or "i just make videos to earn money blah blah..." Big DISSLIKE for your video and channel. I go unsubscribe. Bye.
@marwerno2 жыл бұрын
I guess for some generators there are LPG carburetors (not really carburetors anymore, more like there to regulate inflow) out there which should be possible to be used. What I am wondering about is more like: Under load the generator would take more Hydrogen than under little load: If always operated at high load, the engine would die eventually, not getting enough fuel (or getting lower Hz on the power output or "brown out" which could damage some electrical devices) or you would have too much fuel, pressure in the tank getting above safe levels and I do not want to be around when the brown gas accidentally ignites (I guess a safety valve which leads to a pipe immediate flaming off the excess fuel might actually work.But you really would need to make sure it is not back flaming)
@jamesbennett96542 жыл бұрын
Bruce HH O offers all that is needed for combustion, without aid of gasoline, engine vacuum is all that is needed along with spark to fire the HH O mixture, the throttle plate of the carburetor regulates the amount of mixture allowed in the generator, However the governor will not function; I have built HH O systems using solar panels and led acid batteries, modified DC current and electrolyte to aid voltage production at the plates of HH O generator, check valves to prevent backflow and explosion; Bottom line, The carburetor is basically bypassed and jets are no longer needed because HH O is already atomized and moved by engine vacuum.
@AmericanNEET86442 жыл бұрын
Quick someone download this before YT takes it down
@_john_rick_2 жыл бұрын
Lol 😆
@Forthro2 жыл бұрын
Why would anyone need a video with a bunch of useless lies and misinformation in it? That's just not how our world works, nor from the physical perspective, neither from the common sense one. Perpetual motion engines are not only physically impossible, but also if there was any invention close to this, whole world would be already using them. Oil companies are not the ultimate power, like many conspirologists believe and car manufacturers would already be competing with each other for the most effective water engine.
@тнеЈокег2 жыл бұрын
Have it on my privat Cloud ;-)
@joeylongo49125 ай бұрын
I would like a list of parts please ?? In the description they are not stated. All the brass couplings to context to the water filter ? Thank you.
@DubemOdumАй бұрын
Amazing innovation, I was wondering if the engine would still run on liquid hydrogen itself rather than just water.I would like to talk more about this invention
@amanofmanyparts91202 жыл бұрын
The longer that _outdoor test_ went on, the less gas that was being produced and this miraculous engine still continued to run at the same rpm!
@janyjozsef2 жыл бұрын
The gas level from the hydrogen tank did not decrease. Also, if oxygen is not separated, the resulting gas is dangerous in itself. And the whole system doesn't need a carburetor in this case.
@amanofmanyparts91202 жыл бұрын
@@janyjozsef I could see that the bubbles in the second water tank were often getting smaller and less frequent. That is proof of the reduction in gas production. The whole thing is pure hogwash!
@davidwells36142 жыл бұрын
Yeah I noticed the same thing Definitely look like there was not enough hydrogen produced to have that engine running But if it’s not smoke and mirrors well done
@eliekaram70342 жыл бұрын
impressive video, professional machinery building, i have tried a HHO generator using koh and baking soda as catalysts that weren't efficient enough to run an engine solely but I had so much fun melting multiple materials such as glass metals etc.. by turning the generator into a torch, now as per the HH+ secret component that will make this happen (a catalyst that will increase the efficiency of the electrolysis that can be a game-changer) I would please ask for a sample to try it myself if possible or a video showing the generator running for a more extended period of time to prove that the energy is not withdrawn from the battery to split the water into hydrogen and oxygen (and indeed the water level should decrease since we are splitting it into HHO gas I suggest building a reservoir to maintain a steady stream of distilled water to refill the electrolysis tank is required unless you unscrew the filter container and refill it with water regularly)
@johnanderson1388 Жыл бұрын
Yes it could be running off the batery
@nasriamzar3083 Жыл бұрын
Where can i get HH+? 😅😅
@eliekaram7034 Жыл бұрын
@@nasriamzar3083 i wish i knew
@change9929 Жыл бұрын
When aliens come to our planet,they will say,these people are drinking fuel.😆🧟
@VicenteMoret Жыл бұрын
Saludos, agradecido por tus videos, es la maravilla que está esperando la humanidad..., ya veremos como operan las fuerzas de oposición que se van a desencadenar. Bendiciones. ¿Una pregunta: cuanto puede durar el combustible? ¿Otra: se puede obtener mayor pureza del acero a fin de que éste no se degrade?
@salvatorevecchio2218 Жыл бұрын
Fenomenale , complimenti. Merita di essere sviluppato e applicato in tutta la sua potenzialità risolvendo moltissimi problemi di oggi. Andati avanti.
@syaifulsarnawi96072 жыл бұрын
Mechanic/technician with sense of humour 😊 Your kind of video editing is funny, creative n entertaint without lost technical detail of information, I like it 👍 Try to apply it for welding machine also, please
@johng5397 ай бұрын
Congratulations sir, I I mean we all are proud of u, U need to pated this idea and take this to Honda , not the car manufacturer but Honda that makes these generators, Get a investment partner and go to harbor freight, so I can buy a few of them for myself, Great idea, and only deal with people u trust , God bless One videos please Gold cart would love to see that run and go
@Golden-dog882 ай бұрын
this dude n his invention disappeared 2 days after posting this!!!! thanx CIA
@IronDruids2 жыл бұрын
I can't help but be doubtful. I've been following doomsday people and preppers and DIY project types for years (with a focus on people doing stuff cheaply and creatively because that's all that will be in my wheelhouse) and a semi-quick DIY build that basically replaces your gas bill with the price of water... This would be absolutely everywhere I've been looking for the past decade. It's too simple to do if people know it works so it would be in every other conversation in my group. Hell, nothing here is science that didn't exist during the great depression. Do you think those people wouldn't have figured out a way to diy a system like that to have f'ken power? Save money they needed to feed themselves and their children? Better their lives? And I don't believe for a second the answer to everything I'm saying is the "secret additive". A there's other stuff you can use to run that reaction and B even if you're using something subpar the answer to that is just building a bigger system. You don't think people would build a large ugly system if it meant using water to run their generators? If this genuinely worked the over a million community of people that love this stuff would've figured it out and blasted it to all their friends. It would be a staple of the community. The gas companies could keep it out of the news or off youtube or facebook, but this isn't a group of people that barely go outside and interact with other people. It's just not possible to hide that kind of secret imo. We're too connected and we're a demographic that likes to meet up in real life (Comparatively. I'm just trying to make the point this community doesn't live a hundred percent online where this kind of "news" could be suppressed) I hope this is useful to somebody out there who might be excited enough to drop a couple hundred dollars making their own. Wait on it and see if anybody credible comments on the video or if there's a wave of people making them successfully. Perpetual energy machines get millions of views and those are all shams. Like those, this doesn't pass the most basic common sense test.
@xMekna2 жыл бұрын
Hope so as well
@adrianc.m.49242 жыл бұрын
I think the same
@Scrapbooking.CreativeMemories2 жыл бұрын
🤣😆
@JesseP.Watson2 жыл бұрын
Aye, think you might be right there.
@dubab.249 Жыл бұрын
Technology hides, forbids... Do you think that rockets into earth's orbit run on coal? How would the oil lobby make money if this were developed and put into wider use? Why didn't Tesla allow the development of free electricity? With small additions this works more efficiently with a high frequency generator.
@normmarsh8812 жыл бұрын
next stop waterpowered lawn mowers cars and power to run refrigerators freezers home heaters. Bring it all on. Awesome video. Keep up the good work
@Americanwindgen Жыл бұрын
How did you get the engine running on so little of amount of gas ? output of hho looks really low
@10GTE7 ай бұрын
Correct, that production of hho wouldn't even run a 26cc engine
@justincosby22582 жыл бұрын
Was really hoping to see it hooked up to the carb and how metering to the carb was done. Leaving out some of that makes me a bit doubtful even if I do believe in the possibility of the technology.
@josidasilva55152 жыл бұрын
The genset's cylinder will need nanocoating to avoid cavitation. Use two pressure sensors in series to shut down electricity automatically, one on each container. To improve efficiency use pulse with modulation (PWM) You will have to test for best frequency x Voltage combo. The chemical in the water is just to improve conductivity, it would be an interesting study to find one that can protect against corrosion as well. On Mars, just loop the exhaust to the first cylinder and you can circumnavegate the planet on one liter of water.
@code3k52 жыл бұрын
Being that H is a gas, much like propane, it is probably injected from a plate just behind the carb much like a propane conversion kit. Not much science behind it, hydrogen like propane is highly flammable and auto ignites fast hence the quick starts.
@tribalncgaming10912 жыл бұрын
the basics were used in a toy .. back in the 70s .. its just been suppressed to the utmost by the power hungry elite .. why are we letting kids make rocket fuel? cant have that .. they might get too smart ... definitely a SHTF tech.. at this point.. i am only wondering the degradation of hydrolysis without HH+ which could be difficult to acquire .. unless one stocked up then i would like to know utilization rates etc..
@michaelbrinks80892 жыл бұрын
Anyone who's built an HHO maker/ HHO torch, like this. Knows it takes a lot of power to produce the HHO gas.....I built a small HHO torch a few years back that ran wired directly to a 100W solar panel. I used an air pump needle used to fill up basketballs for the torch tip & the 100W solar panel was enough to give me a little pen flame. An engine will run off HHO but it takes a lot of electricity to create the HHO. It's more efficient just to use an electric motor/electric vehicle. The little 12V generator starting battery might have enough power to run the generator for a few seconds before it goes dead. But he didn't just build a "free power" runs on water device. If someone can figure out how to produce HHO gas from water by using a lot less electricity/power. That's actually what the "big breakthrough" be. Using electricity to break water down into hydrogen & oxygen gas has been known since the late 1800's. To save gasoline/get better MPGs, you could however. #1 build a solar battery bank (or buy a solar generator) #2 Build an HHO generator & run the HHO generator off the battery pack, that's recharged by solar or wall plug-in. Then use a combination of gasoline & HHO to power a vehicle. Say 60% gasoline mixed with 40% HHO gas. In an older lower compression engine & you might have to retard the engine timing & bit.
@terryhayward79052 жыл бұрын
Only a little doubtful ? I would have to see a full technical spec and calculations to believe it. This is yet another version of a perpetual motion machine. Impossible.
@hotmanstan692 жыл бұрын
bros about to disappear
@DrewAk495 ай бұрын
Thank God there were no cuts! Leaving the tool on and all. 😊
@tavernierfl6653 Жыл бұрын
Hi. WOW!! I just watch you entire video and I am impressed 😳 you are a genius…. And your product should be offered to the entire world! Amazing work thank you ! We need more human’s like you thank you. Now the big question is how can we buy this product??
@pauljs752 жыл бұрын
Now I want to see one of the better known workshop KZbinrs have a go at this, since the fab seems well documented enough. See what their findings are in comparison.
@vtferrand45342 жыл бұрын
> well documented enough "Secret" ingredient. > See what their findings are in comparison. There's the rub. Would not withstand scientific scrutiny, i.e. repeatable and reproducible results.
@philoso377 Жыл бұрын
Impressive. Next test is to load the generator with area heaters one at a time to determine the output power.
@01saved6 ай бұрын
Load testing the generator has no bearing on the functionality of the gas motor driving it. The question is “How long with that container of water continue to produce hydrogen?”
@clbooth32 ай бұрын
@@01saved load testing the generator absolutely has everything to do with this. The generator started as a 3kw generator on fossil fuels, wonder what it is able to produce on hydrogen?
@giannis19400 Жыл бұрын
Congratuation !!! for your greatest invention all seasons,. - With water - as fuel. we will not have pollution environment, to the future from the - cars - industry - airplane - boats etc. Also - NO - problem to the future from water because there is plenty - Sea water - river water - rain water. This water-based enjine does not pollute !!! BRAVO ...Greeting from Greece
@corvusmusik8776 Жыл бұрын
I wanna be friends with this guy - His brain seems to work like mine. I love watching this editing!
@lcvflcvf2 жыл бұрын
Hello, I'm sorry but at 23 minutes (youtube) you can see that the amount of hydrogen produced is minimal. Insufficient to keep a 3kw generator running. The volume of air and hydrogen are incompatible with the engine's displacement.
@colingathercole3912 жыл бұрын
@@deterdamel7380 you hit the nail on the head, people think with a brain which has been PROGRAMMED by the system, think outside the box , it's the last FREEDOM they can't control,
@BB-hw2tr2 жыл бұрын
Hydrogen burns hotter and with much better efficiency. Do more research.
@arthurn92372 жыл бұрын
BRILL THIS US JUST 1 FOOT IN THE DOOR OH MY NOT ENOUGH HYDROGEN WA WA WA JUST MAKE IT A LIL BIT BIGGER 🤪 YEA I DON'T SEE YOU MAKING ANY THIS INTERESTING
@PaulFrankAdams2 жыл бұрын
Without the carbon clogging everything up, you need far less pure clean burning hydrogen. Go figure!
@ericlimds2 жыл бұрын
I am curious how much brown gas your wet cells is producing to power that 3kw generator.
@billk65852 жыл бұрын
You cannot ever get more power from converting hydrogen to water (burning it) than you can from turning water to hydrogen (in fact, you will generate significant loss). This video, however, is capable of generating money based on nothing but misdirection, so it’s a success in my book! I did notice that he removed the fuel tank so it’s not some kind of gas/hydrogen mix which-I dunno, could help a little I guess.
@TKSubDude Жыл бұрын
Just one question. How fast was the battery depleted? The power/watts required to sustain an engine would be more than the DC charging wattage.
@zombie_snax Жыл бұрын
I don't think anyone knows how precious of a resource fresh water is.. its way more important and rare than any fossil fuels.
@SentinelAerospaceOfficial2 ай бұрын
We have oceans. we dont need fresh water
@jacobgoodsell64142 жыл бұрын
Was nice knowing you!
@bobbycarr23192 жыл бұрын
built one for 87 4runner, it was a hybrid setup using both fuel and hho. only worked on full manifold vacuum( i added a port to top of intake runners) took it from about 17ish mpg to 40 plus unloaded , and about 28mpg fully loaded . since it had a mechanical maf sensor adjusting the spring was pretty easy. used it for about 6 months and it worked great.... forgot to switch it off(never wired the contactor to switch ... was laying in floor board) charged battery next morning turned key ... blew the hood off and destroyed all the intake plastic.... about 3 weeks later the number 1 piston flew through the side of the block =)
@fvrrljr2 жыл бұрын
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA laughing at the outcome not at ya!.you should've turn the switch off. I feel for you Bro
@gladeloy33412 жыл бұрын
ooops !
@johnlivingston92172 жыл бұрын
no flash arrestor in the line?
@michellestansberry79162 жыл бұрын
Want to see more applications
@phredflypogger44252 жыл бұрын
Hydrogen can build up in the sump of a conventional IC engine go boom.
@austinmcdaniel890Ай бұрын
See you in the afterlife 😂 Nah just kidding. Awesome invention😊
@Shipfixer Жыл бұрын
So we can all build one of these and it will certainly work. The only small drawback is we cant buy HH+. Thanks a lot.
@oscarbattaglia91302 жыл бұрын
You are running a motor using OH which is produced by the energy of the same motor and also running other devices with it??!! well, you are creating energy my friend, congratulations!! Nobel Prize for you!
@Grommo2 жыл бұрын
con artist prize for him.
@aryan1211_2 жыл бұрын
Oh yes i was looking for such comments only cause i was wondering the same, and how does a gasoline engine run on HHO even
@oscarbattaglia91302 жыл бұрын
@@aryan1211_ yes, and how does a gasoline engine work with using only one small HHO bubble per second...... But I have to say that it was a nice mechanic job though
@JackSpeed2 жыл бұрын
Always watch your back. Big oil companies don't like when people do stuff like this
@quint_gamerz Жыл бұрын
Nice tech buddy
@projector71416 ай бұрын
The battery is providing the energy. It is not self sustaining. There is a huge energy loss in electrolysis, then also in the engine. So the energy source is the battery, not the water. It only gets a little energy back from the alternator. You're making a gas that is cheaper than gasoline vapour over maybe 10 years. But charging a battery from the wall and using an inverter is cheaper and more efficient and doesn't need a machine shop. So, really, after a certain amount of time, the battery would drain down to a point it is completely damaged, then the electrolysis would stop, then the engine would stop. But you showed you can run an engine off Brown's gas. The air intake is being used to reduce the concentration of the gas. At full load, this battery might last 10 minutes. Maybe an hour if you drain it down to 1V and don't mind buying batteries often. You could achieve the same by just taking off the spark plug and using the alternator as an inverter if you have an old or free generator laying around. Inverters are cheap. Very cheap. You could build one of those.
@eskb12 жыл бұрын
Thank you for sharing this amazing video, hope other people watching this wonderful video will understand the knowledge this person is giving away for free.,...
@ogi222 жыл бұрын
Yes, i love the knowledge he is presenting. He is showing how to trick people in the "good old snake oil salesmen" style.
@01mustang052 жыл бұрын
@@ogi22 And nobody in their right mind doesn't realize the mass and generational child abuses damaging the majority. Let's talk about what's really going wrong and why before another innocent and helpless child's life is ruined, eh?
@ghoulbuster12 жыл бұрын
@@01mustang05 Ah yes the old "Think of the children!!!" argument, works every time!
@user-jy8cp7hn6n Жыл бұрын
Это прекрасно и гениально! Но пока есть нефть и газ и магнаты имеют прибыль, такие технологии могут быть только в гараже. Браво!
@pick_pick_pick4 ай бұрын
this is the video of the year, congratulations. i love it ( HH is Hydrazine Hydrate )
@user-cg2fd3yl1z10 ай бұрын
Any Nigerian Igbo man here, it's time for business 😮😮😮
@philuent2 жыл бұрын
Would be awesome to see a comparison of one of these running on gas only vs your hydrogen version (which is awesome btw) Questions that come to my mind: how long can each one run before refueling? assuming unlimited fuel, how long can each one run for before breaking? what kind of internal differences occur with the combustion components, any damage or internal / blowby issues? same oil cycle or any noticed differences there? running temp on the motor i would think would be less if anything, can definitely see a lot of positives with this solution beyond the obvious not burning fossil fuels. also is water produced and collected as a byproduct?
@williamcouts73572 жыл бұрын
It's a fuel cell. I don't think the alternator is running to keep the battery charged. I don't think it could. Energy in has to equal energy out. The battery is draining while electrolysis is occurring. That's why there are two switches.
@philuent2 жыл бұрын
@@williamcouts7357 I have it in my mind if it can run a 3k W motor it can probably recharge the battery or atleast put some of it back into it so it doesn't discharge as quickly but maybe your right. In my mind it wouldn't break laws of physics since the engine brings in additional air into the combustion chamber (not burning all gases produced from electrolysis alone)
@ioann2352 жыл бұрын
Ok, and when the water will vanish from the Earth, what you gona do...move on Mars?
@philuent2 жыл бұрын
@@ioann235 Lol this has gotta be a troll. Seawater is among one of the most abundant resources we have and the water doesn't vanish from electrolysis, it is recombined through the combustion process
@ioann2352 жыл бұрын
@@philuent Recombine from what if you burn the hydrogen using the oxygen...This is the reason hydrogen engines never got approval for use...not because of the oil companies😎
@terryvickers5986 Жыл бұрын
Great minds think alike. I am presently working on a similar project. My generator doesn't have electric start so it will work somewhat differently. With measurements. Pressure, and volume of gas produced, amps and volts of electrolysis, and other details.
@achuthanaidu14764 ай бұрын
Hatsup your invention should be appreciated god will bless you with lots of success ❤
@miraitvvlog311010 ай бұрын
No electricity this is great idea wow
@tristanball50082 жыл бұрын
This is why the dislike button shouldn’t have been removed
@Hapasan8082 жыл бұрын
I'm a little concerned that people think the water is the energy source, and that _"Oil compaines will shut this down!"_
@rossbrigoli6780 Жыл бұрын
Did you remove the Carburator? How long does it last before running out of battery power? What is the current draw on the electrodes?
@ruriijassem7252 Жыл бұрын
I actually would love to know if the carb was removed as it starts for 1 second and shuts off again
@danimarcasei6 ай бұрын
@@ruriijassem7252 dico ma lo capite che senza carburatore non può funzionare deve dare la giusta miscela aria carburante in questo caso idrogeno ... Ma proprio non avete idea di quello che avete visto ...e inoltre continuo ad essere molto scettico!!!