What an absolutely brilliant man … can’t wait to read the book!
@jataayu1 Жыл бұрын
Charvaka Podcast is a KZbin channel that I admire and follow. Kudos to you for this wonderful conversation with Aravindan Neelakandan, one of the greatest minds of India on his upcoming great Book on Hindutva. The erudite and cheerful host Kushal Mehra puts the most appropriate and provactive questions to get the best from AN. I would recommend all my friends to listen and relish this interview and get illuminated on the subject.
@shaalvinsharma3971 Жыл бұрын
Enlightened.. The only word that comes to my mind after listening to Aravindan.
@pragyanshsingh6093 Жыл бұрын
Beautiful Conversation. The point on Dharmacharya was excellent. Any such people, who tries to endorse caste in garb of tradition must be shunned away from the society. Let them practice their caste apologia in the shadows. Such dharmacharyas are as harmful to hindu society as an Islamists.
@RitwikRaghav Жыл бұрын
This was one of the best discussions I have ever heard.
@logicrationalcommonsense1335 Жыл бұрын
Already Pre ordered ! hoping to receive it soon !
@ksb_067 Жыл бұрын
Great respect to kushal and Aravindam ji
@hindurashtra63 Жыл бұрын
The Future of Bhaarat is like that of Japan. Japanese are embracing Development, Modernization and Scientific Temprament. At the same time, They embrace their Ancienet Civilization, Culture and are Proud of their Identity.
@abhaypatel4292 Жыл бұрын
You wrong about it..if India wouldn't have had been invaded we would have gone the korean and japanese way of becoming atheist.. japanese love their history culture however they are not fundamentalist..they are known for potraying their gods in the most vulgar way in porn and manga industry...in today's sense it's a atheist socity based on practicality loving it's past.. that's all
@gautamdesiraju9717 Жыл бұрын
Wonderful and educational.
@cprabakar5997 Жыл бұрын
❤ informative discussion....so nice Aravind
@kalapipaasi5977 Жыл бұрын
Rabindranath Tagore says about the Mundaka Upanishad parable of the Two Birds where they are sitting on the same bough as one of them feeds and the other looks on, is an image of mutual relationship of the infinite being and the finite self. The delight of the bird which looks on is greater, for it is pure and free delight. There are both of these birds in man himself, the objective one with its business of life, the subjective one with its disinterested joy of vision. Because the left hemisphere of the brain controls the dominant right hand, it came to be widely regarded as the dominant or major hemisphere, and the right as non-dominant or minor. Savants typically show impairment of abilities that are related to the left hemisphere and boast considerable development in skills that are normally controlled by the right hemisphere. I wonder what the brain structure of a Rishi would be, and if Hinduism is a consequence of evolutionary biology. Could the Vedas be a product of what the Rishis saw, and the Upanishads be a product of with what they saw? Is the Sum Total of the Hindu philosophy be because of what they saw, and what they were bestowed with to see? Does the act of seeing and the instrument of seeing have implications for the direction in which Artificial Intelligence develops in disparate societies of today? Which direction could the advances in computer-brain interfaces and future developments in augmentation of the brain take us? Will the future wars be bloodless, and fought with voluntarily and remotely connected brains? If Mandhara Mishra was defeated by Adi Shankaracharya in a debate as opposed to a fist fight or a sword fight, could future conflicts occur and resolve in a manner completely different from today? Will the wars of the future be wars of ideas, rather than for resources - in a possible future world of abundance? Will we have anything left for fighting at all? Or will societies cleave, and live in their own domains, conflict-free, in a multitude of truths? Will there just be a clash of ideas between remotely connected brains but no physical confrontation, like playing with each other and many others in a video game in an environment of virtual reality?
@geopolitics1232 Жыл бұрын
Jarur dekhna sahebs part 1 🇮🇳
@chickenbuttermasala8458 Жыл бұрын
Bhai ye to full on fangirl hogaya hai
@Theamanhanda Жыл бұрын
Kushal do you ship your merch to USA ( New Jersey )
@DevDJP Жыл бұрын
FANTASTIC
@ex-fabiansocialist1660 Жыл бұрын
Thanks
@Mkayou Жыл бұрын
Is there a Kindle edition for this book?
@bhabanism Жыл бұрын
Please keep volume of Intro and your discussion at same level, have to change each time.
@vedanshmishra8803Ай бұрын
Omg i m fan
@RitwikRaghav Жыл бұрын
Where Aravindan Sir talked about the two statements of Guruji, I wished to ask if a middle path is not possible? I mean, how can the Paramarthik truth of "All have the same Ātma" be induced to remove the difference between enemies and friends while doing Seva as both these entities and the action of Seva belong to the Vyavahārika?
@RitwikRaghav Жыл бұрын
Can't there be a new institution based on debate and discussion to provide intellectual leadership to Dharmiks? Can't Adi Shankara's methods be used against the modern Shankaracharyas?
@ajomichael7604 Жыл бұрын
Who are they talking about @44:10; anybody please
@vincentbrk Жыл бұрын
Shankaracharyas
@siddharthsinhdodiya2534 Жыл бұрын
@@vincentbrk is he talking about Aadi Shankar ?
@vincentbrk Жыл бұрын
@@siddharthsinhdodiya2534 No just the ones in the Matts now.
@siddharthsinhdodiya2534 Жыл бұрын
@@vincentbrk ok thank you
@Abhishek-nj6rf Жыл бұрын
At 44:10 who are they talking about?
@datascientist851 Жыл бұрын
Aryans Came????? Waah Ray 😁😁😁
@vickyvidhyarthi2987 Жыл бұрын
name of the book at 21:10
@AkhilSiddharth Жыл бұрын
The Gnostic Gospels by Elaine Pagels
@__LAmar__4 ай бұрын
5:47
@geopolitics1232 Жыл бұрын
Sahebs part 1 dekha hai kya sir
@pravinveer2234 Жыл бұрын
Khan Market Gang of Hindutva
@ManjitSingh-pg9qz Жыл бұрын
Why are arranged marriages still based on staying in your own caste in 2022? why are we hipocrites , blaming others
@Noob_X69 Жыл бұрын
Apparently now dharmachaarya are problem. Typical RSS type reformist mindset. Such a drag for such a brilliant man
@lakshyabhardwaj9541 Жыл бұрын
some definitely are. I'd prefer Rajiv Malhotra and someone who has worked with him, rather than any dharmacharya
@lakshyabhardwaj9541 Жыл бұрын
@@cinefile0075 exactly, that's why Hindutva is necessary. it resists outside attacks but also prevents internal breakdown simultaneously.
@RitwikRaghav Жыл бұрын
All kind of orthodoxy is problematic. Adi Shankara himself went against the Dharmacāryas of his time, won and gave the society a new direction.
@raghavnamasivayam8706 Жыл бұрын
Well dharmachaarya is good but if there are discriminatory things then no
@Iyago0RoaDBoXeR Жыл бұрын
Bharat Bhagya Vidhata is not acceptable, This signifies Superdeterminism, the true meaning of Bhagvadgeeta is never to look up to someone transedental as your destiny maker, true vedantic meaning of karma is that it never exist, it's all in the mind, the only reality is the freedom at the present moment to liberate yourself, never fate, never destiny so how can someone be a vidhata, the female mother goddess is the giver of freedom, she is the key to the supreme truth, if we consider our destiny to be realized as the supreme consciousness then only Mother India can be the fate spinner and spindler, so here lots of metaphysics is involved, RN Tagore was a Vedantic Brahmo Samaji, so there is lots to unravel here
@Noob_X69 Жыл бұрын
Irony is he thinks bringing muslims into our festival will change their mind over generation. Tablighis are laughing in corner. Sita Ram Goel ji was right about subh ppl.. anyways
@lakshyabhardwaj9541 Жыл бұрын
this statement was made by Savarkar Ji, resistance is needed while hatred won't help
@abhaypatel4292 Жыл бұрын
Well it does..i myself has noticed it ... segregating them is no option the only thing you could do is homogenisation..
@RitwikRaghav Жыл бұрын
Bringing Muslims in our festivals is the right approach. But it should be done from a position of strength and knowledge of self. The modern Hindus lack both and thus, the results come out opposite to what is expected.