"Historian" REACTS to ANDREW TATE

Andrew Tate has ruffled the feathers of people all over the world with his unique view of the world. Many of the problems he identifies he blames on the decline of the west and often shares his view on how history led us to where we are now.
So today I will give a "historians" reaction (or "history influencer" I haven't decided which one is better yet) to many of the claims he makes whether its about the Roman Empire the British Empire of modern America.
#andrewtate #tatespeech #tate #history #romanempire #britishempire #usa #historyrevealed

[@nitinchalla3273]

The majority of areas ruled by the British in India, Andhra Tamil Nadu and the princely states close to the British are to this day way better off in terms of money, education and openness than their counterparts ruled by local kings, for example, Rajasthan, Kashmir, Hyderabad state (Telangana, which is still poor except for the city) where the Human developmental is to this day appalling.

[@castiron9002]

We also have to remember that the Eastern roman empire live on until 1453 and have a some great emperors like Basil II and Justinian

[@dannyanglim1784]

ONE WORD...... Balnahard, the Romans didn't just give up because of the Scottish???? To these historians, Balnahard Beach.... Put that in ya pipe and smoke it, now NONE of you have an excuse!!

[@richardb1816]

Praying for the day some actual historians come back to history KZbin.. guess not today

[@TWH442]

Regarding the fall of empires I dont think comparing USA or The West to the roman empire or british empire is valid because usa is a country and the west is many countried and neither are expanding into othets territory and conquering land like the roman or british empire. So I dont think we will see a collapse of USA or The West like Rome collapsed in a sudden fashion. I just think countries like China will rise to be equals of USA in terms of power.

[@ProfessorBernardFuck]

I managed about 2 minutes of tate before I turned off. A new record for me!

[@Dacijo]

Doesn't mean he is wrong

[@kirtivardhansinghshekhawat9742]

I’d like to debate , consider this a challenge 😄

[@The_king567]

India is a bad example honestly they built the Taj Mahal and other pretty stuff the Brit’s didn’t

[@jc-16.]

You just know this fella has no luck with women if he comsumes tate content.

[@PedofiIe_Muhammad]

Not at all. I am from India. And there is a history that every Indian wants to forget. The British conquest was bank rolled by Indian businessmen. Because they say that the westerners diligently abided by their contracts. And unlike the Indian kings and ruling class, the westerners were not interested in others wives.

[@tracertongsdong2267]

Can you explain more, please.

[@DinoBryce]

True the business men funded anti Mughal expansion which caused major unrest

[@ExpertBustice]

So, you're not actually a Historian?

[@alexanderorr2528]

As someone with a ancient history degree who helped create the digital mint/coin archive at Rutgers University this guy is an goofy incel who thinks he would be some chad patriarch "if only he were born in the golden days of Rome!" but he would just be a goofy incel except now in ancient Rome lmao.

[@proster7920]

He is more of a history fan, is there an actual historian. Unlike me who's a history hobbiest 😂

[@philoslother4602]

You do not need to have a degree in History to call yourself a historian, this is different from other professiona

[@NotIncognito.53]

​@@philoslother4602no u do, he is biased therefor he wil spread missinformation, he doesnt know what hes talking abt.

[@jrhackman7414]

@@NotIncognito.53 a majority of historians at every major university are biased to an even greater degree.

[@samhowl1152]

Do you have "historian" like this in the title because you don't actually hold any relevant degrees or work for anyone as a historian?

[@RpattoYT]

MmMmmm, love it, tasty. The British do love their salty chips, make haste with the salt peasant.

[@CharlieHoliday369]

Anyone who has obtained a history degree after 2000 has a HELL of a lot of UNlearning to do ! Best education is self education these days !

[@samhowl1152]

@@CharlieHoliday369 so no then

[@thearbiter3351]

You don't need a "degree" of the system to be a historian.. Get a life

[@samhowl1152]

@@thearbiter3351 me? I can see your comments. You like to argue on the internet..I think it is you who needs a life lol

[@MrEvanMorrison]

Same thing with The Beaver Wars in Canada as India, to an extent. The Iroquois were massacring tribes like the Huron and the Algonquin so they allied themselves with the French/Europeans for both military support and trade, which in turn fueled the expansion of British and French into the Great Lakes regions and eventually all of Canada...

[@hulakan]

"Britain" did not conquer India. A private corporation, the East India Company, did.

[@randomkidnapper911]

the East India company was transferred to the crown of queen Victoria which had a lot to do with the British army but I get what you’re saying

[@robertlewis2855]

Tate's analysis of the rise of the British raj is quite simplistic and one dimensional. The British weren't simply militarily powerful, they were adept in diplomacy, engineering, cartography, large organisational management and more, and that was even in the East India Company days. I wonder what research Tate's done to inform his opinions and historical understanding. I don't think he's thoroughly mistaken on what he does include, but it's what he doesn't include that matters. Also, his articulation of his view holds him back

[@designatedpiledriver8216]

On that panel. I’m sure if he was engaged in a deeper conversation he would expand.

[@ObamanableSnowman]

​@@designatedpiledriver8216yeah I agree. He implied most of those things through his "summary" that the British brought many things that made the people see them as better. Most of that understanding was clear, so I'm not sure if the original comment is referring to the military/conquering application of those things specifically. Because Andrew Tate did not explicitly list those things but he gave a generalization and then listed a few things in that subject and then said they were a huge part of why the Indians looked up to them. Even if he wasn't aware of one or more of those specific influences/effects, his main generalization that the British used their advancements to be friendly and welcome in India could easily cover those specific things. Maybe he isnt specifically knowledgeable about the diplomatic advancements that we cannot know. But we do know that he said they were likened by people and those people joined them. That takes a LOT of skill and covers almost any non military advancement in concept and that happens across any decade/era across any land. The amount of respect he speaks for the ability to bring people together and have them respect your culture is clearly at least close to if not more than what he gives to pure military might. Remember he is speaking on a video/podcast and he is limited on time. Most people would not think that deep not would they listen that deep if he went there. We have to start with general ideas first or we lose all attention and respect.

[@brendanleichty1437]

you're the man

[@mannymcmac1544]

I go to this channel and certainly Andrew Tate for my historical facts😂😂 stfu

[@alexanderorr2528]

This channel is absolute clown world. As someone who has their history degree and helped make the Rutgers digital mint/coin archive I'm glad you at least put historian in quotes..."historian reacts to Andrew Tate" really?? Everything I've seen on this channel is half-baked, bias or straight up nonsense that would be laughed out of any respectable history department.

[@TXNanna3]

So start your own channel

[@EdwardHohenheim]

​@@TXNanna3So a youtube channel is what gives you credibility?

[@RhiannonLarge-qk5fn]

Prove it?? You think your so smart don't tell us how smart you are prove that what he's saying is wrong... I'll wait 😂

[@englishman9020]

Before the British came to India musilms conquered India but indians tofay dont complain about it

[@AQ_77]

Thats where you’re wrong, they definitely do

[@ucitcer3szdfka-oxmcy0zww46]

‘History influencer’ 😂 the absolute state of history KZbin is pitiful.

[@Dacijo]

Our empire is falling in the most boring way possible, gender politics and pretending racism is still a huge problem. While islam and communism use our desire to be kind to drag us down.

[@spacecube8561]

tate is wrong - again. china will NEVER surpass the USA, just like Japan never did.

[@roscopecotrainer77]

They made celebrities out of their chefs just before the collapse🙈

[@ravinderdhupia4779]

Come on man......Equality b4 law did not exist? India had the greatest religion of Sikhism. Agreed.....it was a very small minority religion....mainly in Punjab...but it was still there. Human Equality(Racial, Gender, Caste, etc), Tolerance of others, Universal brotherhood, Human Rights for all human beings, Freedom of Religion, Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Conscience, Justice for ALL, Equality b4 law, selfless service of Humanity, Honesty, Integrity, Truth, Contentment, Forgiveness, Righteousness, Peace, Love, Humility, etc, are sum of the core values of Sikhism....a religion which btw started in the medieval times.

[@Hoe-numan5]

Nope

[@ravinderdhupia4779]

@@Hoe-numan5 - Lol. Socked at how civilized Sikhism is??? Sikhism is the greatest force of civilization ever known to the human race.

[@Michael-zi3kk]

I can't disagree I'd argue that it's the last 300 to 400 years that Western Civilization has been the Undisputed world power since Spain and Portugal were the superpowers in the 16th and 1700 and I consider them Western civilizations I don't think any other country could mess with Spain in the 16 to 1700 aside from maybe Portugal

[@voyello]

> as if there will ever be a chance of uniting them. The whole powerful when united babble is childish for groups who identify themselves differently. Tate is a simpleton.

[@wlleyeam123]

They added value and, were among the first to abolish slavery and enforce the abolition in their sphere of influence.

[@4chan-Crypto]

the channel is a massive joke: No, India was not divided as a single entity before the arrival of the British. The Indian subcontinent was home to various kingdoms, empires, and regional powers with distinct cultures, languages, and political systems. The territory was characterized by a diverse array of societies and political entities. Historically, different parts of the Indian subcontinent witnessed the rise and fall of various empires, such as the Maurya Empire, Gupta Empire, Mughal Empire, and numerous regional kingdoms. These entities often had their own boundaries and control over specific regions. The British colonial presence in India began with the establishment of the East India Company's trading posts in the 17th century. Over time, the British gradually expanded their control through colonization, annexations, and indirect rule. The British Raj, which lasted from the mid-19th century until 1947, marked a period of British dominion over most of the Indian subcontinent.

[@thearbiter3351]

You're literally saying the same thing (with a bit of extra info) but worded differently..

[@mitchamcommonfair9543]

The British were able to conquer India because Indian elites wanted it. They ruled together

[@TankManHeavy]

Yeah you literally just parroted what they said in the video. The British were trading in India for 150 years before they were approached by Indian nobility to help them against their enemies (other Indians).

[@RhiannonLarge-qk5fn]

Dude did u watch the video u just said witha little extra what was said in the video your very ignorant telling him he's a joke whilst parroting what he said your not as smart as you think you are 😂

[@RhiannonLarge-qk5fn]

U just said exactly what he said dude your the joke did u actually watch the video

[@joelrumidi3268]

There were no tribes in India cvnt

[@jackmerrideww]

Pure brainrot

[@historicalperspective]

Nice title and thumb nail lol

[@sabar2453]

Atleast you've put Historian in quotations marks in your title, because you are far from a Historian or an academic.

[@pulsar2049]

I think saying the British occupation was beneficial for India is a slight stretch. Yes, they modernized India, provided education, but they also kinda destabilized india during that time. The Raj contains India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Burma. It's kinda like the Berlin conference but less extreme. Uniting three different religious groups is a disaster. So It took many years after independence to restabilize (partition). Also, the generic killing wasn't the biggest problem you see in India. But the Bengali famine during ww2. India had >3 million men serving in ww2, to not supply India is to cut off future recruits for the military. Not even mentioning the moral implications of colonialism.

[@TankManHeavy]

I mean its easy to throw a blanket over the Bengali famine & point the finger but the fact of the matter is that the British Empire redirected 150,000 tonnes of barley/wheat from Iraq & Australia to Bengal, the shortage was yet another example of richer people panic buying supplies so that the poorer people couldn't afford it. We even saw it during the pandemic, people were whipped into a panic & bought out shit so there wasn't enough to go around. Furthermore, there was another 250,000 tonnes of food sent after the famine was declared. Here's an extract; "By January 1944, Bengal had received a total of 130,000 tons of barley from Iraq, 80,000 tons of wheat from Australia and 10,000 from Canada, followed by a further 100,000 from Australia. (British Colonies) Then, on 14 February 1944, Churchill called an emergency meeting of the War Cabinet to see if more food aid could be sent to Bengal without wrecking Allied plans for the coming Normandy landings." The extract further goes onto say that Churchill urged the Americans to send ships to Australia to transport a further million tonnes of wheat to India since the food was available but the British didn't have the ships required to transport it quick enough, the request was denied by the American president. Great Britain has & always will be proud to call the Indian people our brothers & sisters.

[@bigbingo5837]

I think were at the end of the republic nit the end if the empire. Age of heroes is coming.

[@natureisallpowerful]

Andrew tate candace owens,go and have a listen to it. Two adults having a conversation about truth.