HJS - CPC - ALL QUESTIONS OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE - HARYANA JUDICIAL SERVICES - 2010 - 2021

[@sakshichug3858]

Very informative session thank u sirji ...

[@Chandrika20]

time saving video and you explained very nicely each and every questions with sections and orders with rules. best master piece before exam .....thnq soo much sir

[@Currentlyjungkooking]

I have watched almost all HJS videos.. really appreciate 🙏🏻

[@lawandgk]

Thanks a lot for your appreciation. Please press LIKE and share our videos with your friends and followers.

[@inshapraveen3222]

Sir it was amazing thank u so much sir

[@amitshah2936]

Salute to you sir.. But with a request that pls made more video of more subject on every state

[@xyz-tc1uy]

This is one of the best channel for preparation

[@lawandgk]

Thanks for your appreciation. pls LIKE and share the videos with your friends.

[@xyz-tc1uy]

Thankyou sir please bring questions specifically for jharkhand judiciary

[@TheJAYANTI1]

8:03 question 114. Shouldn't the answer be b. Executing court can entertain the challenge of nullity of decree - Kiran Singh v. Chamanlal Paswan

[@TheJAYANTI1]

17:01 q. 15. Ans should be d. Sec 125. Rules are subject to previous approval of state govt.

[@lawandgk]

Pls refer Section 122.

[@komal331]

Mandatory injunction 39SRA and prepetual Injunction section 38

[@lawandgk]

yes correct.

[@satyamevjayate110]

thank you so much, ye wali videos bohot help karti hain sir. baaki major subjects ki bhi aayengi kya??

[@lawandgk]

YES.

[@sahilsingla2567]

Sir, Haryana Ke liye GK pr bhi video bna dijiye pls .... Apne pronise kiya tha

[@lawandgk]

Will make definitely. Time shortage challenge rhi h. Weekend par pakka.

[@aishwaryamsingh2882]

10:24 The answer to the question no 121 should be B (please refer to the latest SC judgment -ASMA LATEEF & ANR. V. SHABBIR AHMAD & ORS. 2024 )

[@lawandgk]

Please read para 15 of that judgement. The verb ‘shall’ in Rule 10 [although substituted for the verb ‘may’ by the Amendment Act of 1976] does not elevate the first alternative to the status of a mandatory provision, so much so that in every case where a party from whom a written statement is invited fails to file it, the court must pronounce the judgment against him. If that were the purport, the second alternative to which ‘shall’ equally applies would be rendered otiose. I hope you will get it.

[@aishwaryamsingh2882]

@@lawandgk yes that’s exactly what I meant as well Sir , that it is saying it’s written - the court Shall - pronounce judgment against him OR make such order as it thinks fit This means if we read the shall as mandatory then the only choice is to pass the judgment and by this interpretation there’s no scope for the application of the latter part which is passing any other order as it thinks fit That’s why it can’t be read as mandate

[@aishwaryamsingh2882]

And as the per the para quoted by you above from the judgment same inference is made out The verb 'shall' in Rule 10 does not elevate the first alternative (which is passing the judgment )to the status of a mandatory provision, (ie it’s not mandatory)so much so that in every case where a party from whom a written statement is invited fails to file it, the court must pronounce the judgment against him. If that were the purport,( if that is read as shall )the second alternative (pass any other order)to which 'shall' equally applies would be rendered of no practical use "

[@anubhavgarg3908]

Q106 at 5.24 answer should be C may or may not. Kindly check it again.

[@lawandgk]

C cannot be the ans. 'may or may not' is not an appropriate ans. pls refer the case i have mentioned.

[@anubhavgarg3908]

Singhal's explanation is not correct for this viewpoint (If you have marked this answer from singhal's.)The case doesn't expressly says that RJ applies or not...but reading the entire judgment will tell you that it may or may not...​ Read the entire judgment..i still stick to option C.@@lawandgk

[@lawandgk]

@@anubhavgarg3908 ok fine. i'll recheck the ans.

[@pankajsood3084]

Q 121..right option is B

[@lawandgk]

Ans is correct. SHALL is mentioned in provision. Pls chk.

[@mallikaarora3614]

10:24 sir the option should be B for ques 121 as there is an option to either pronounce judgment or pass any other order

[@lawandgk]

Please refer the provision. Words, ' ''shall' is used. shall pronounce and ...... a decree shall be drawn.

[@adv.himanshugupta1162]

Sir inki pdf provide krwa do na subject wise

[@nusratperween8988]

Sir Aisa hi jharkhand ke lye v karaye

[@lawandgk]

WHEN IS EXAM ?

[@ishamishra4757]

10 march​@@lawandgk

[@nusratperween8988]

10 march

[@Vanya.1302]

Question no 108 Other party can adduce evidence Order 11 rule 22 Kindly check if this is correct or not

[@lawandgk]

That is USE IN EVIDENCE in Rule 22 and not adduce evidence.

[@Vanya.1302]

@@lawandgk okay sir

[@Vanya.1302]

Sir kindly explain i hv doubt on this point

[@lawandgk]

@@Vanya.1302 there is difference between use the reply as evidence and adduce evidence. Adduce means you are bring new evidence to prove something. so in Rule 22 - it is mentioend may use as evidence. the one party can use the reply submitted by the other as evidence.