What got you Into naval history or that topic in general?
@joshthomas-moore26562 жыл бұрын
What are your favorite examples of ships that "Died as they lived"?
@robertmills86402 жыл бұрын
I think the proposed 1919 raid would be a great candidate for one of your "what if" wargames videos.
@brendonbewersdorf9862 жыл бұрын
Compared to the graf zeppelin do you think the German plans to convert the Europa and into a carrier would have been a more effective design?
@toriasygramul71282 жыл бұрын
SMS Frauenlob
@Big_E_Soul_Fragment2 жыл бұрын
Impressive that this ship made it to WW2 and actually served in the war
@jon-paulfilkins78202 жыл бұрын
She was still around, still sea worth and serviceable, and above all, we were desperate! I remember my Grandfather talking about his first ship, in 1940 laid up so long the deck planking was mostly rotten or warped and underneath that a huge amount of rust.
@Neithan022 жыл бұрын
You make do with what Is there. Does it float? Can it be used? Et voila you have a warship
@myparceltape11692 жыл бұрын
Many of the WW1 ships served to the end of WW2. Some were famous and Warspite objected to being scrapped.
@nicoferguson12152 жыл бұрын
Not a brit ship, but a famous American example is the Texas
@Tomyironmane2 жыл бұрын
USS Langley (CV-1) was crippled by Japanese air attack and scuttled in 1942.
@Paludion2 жыл бұрын
Incredible that an aircraft carrier made from the hull of a cruise ship managed to survive that long, both from budget cuts and ennemy weapons.
@mattwoodard25352 жыл бұрын
Of the two, the budget cuts were probably the bigger enemy. sm
@charlesparr16112 жыл бұрын
Cruise ships didnt even exist, at this point in time. The hulls were those of Ocean Liners, which are very fast very strongly built vessels designed to keep a rigid schedule that means they cannot simply skip things like major storms. Aside from armour, which as I understand it is a thing 'attached' to the hulls of the ships, not something that 'is' the hull of a ship, it's likely that a Liner would be among the strongest, fastest, and most fuel efficient designs available, and also designed to accommodate large amounts of people, and of course Warships needed to carry a lot of people as crew both to operate all the additional systems required on a military vessel, and those along to replace casualties. All in all, I have a feeling it wasn't an inferior choice from the outset, and would think the real problems would involve obsolescence of the military additions and not the Hull itself that would be at issue over time, except possibly for size as newer aircraft presumably need the larger flight decks that became the standard... it seems like a lot of Carriers were conversions from other designs, I wonder if it might be that the hull design isn't all that critical, and when you contemplate the state of the worlds economy around that time, you can guess there were MANY half finished and also unwanted ships being built all over the world...
@franzfanz2 жыл бұрын
They certainly got their money's worth out of her.
@TheChonaman2 жыл бұрын
Keep in mind that CVs were always surrounded by support ships. Many destroyers, some cruisers, and battleships in most cases. These were the sacred cows of WWII once the navy realized that airpower was all-important for naval supremacy.
@neilwilson5785 Жыл бұрын
At least the sailors could buy the drinks package and go on shore excursions.
@mudmug12 жыл бұрын
Here's a log book entry from my grandfather “aircraft type: Hurricane, pilot: self, Duty: D.L. on Argus (over the side first landing)”) With this entry is a photo of concerned crew looking over the side of Argus at a slick on the water and my grandfather's head bobbing in the water
@kommandantgalileo Жыл бұрын
Preserve that photo, send it to a museum, do something to protect this piece of history!
@robertmills86402 жыл бұрын
The proposed 1919 raid makes one wonder what design and doctrine changes would have resulted if the raid actually happened.
@Julius_Hardware2 жыл бұрын
A good subject for Drach
@rickgehring75072 жыл бұрын
that was one of the debates my Grandfather and some of his aviation friends had, my opinion , it would of changed naval tactics for ever, I truly believe Japan would of never built Yamato and Musashi as battle ships, they would of been "super carries, I don't think Iowa class Battleships would exist, that money would of gone to US "super carriers"
@gregorywright49182 жыл бұрын
@@fullmontyuk Much greater appreciation for anti-torpedo nets in anchorages...
@Aren-19972 жыл бұрын
Would be interested to hear more about such what-if historical events in future vids.
@rogerwilco22 жыл бұрын
@@rickgehring7507 You might want to learn the difference between "of" and "have".
@francis94692 жыл бұрын
my great grandfather served on Argus in 1918, always nice to see the histories of his ships!
@josenighthawk2 жыл бұрын
Cool! ... What Pride & Honor!
@stevevalley78352 жыл бұрын
Argus was one of the carriers classified "experimental" by the Washington Treaty. That meant she could be replaced at the Admiralty's convenience, rather than waiting until she was 20 years old. I have read that the Admiralty had a plan to replace Argus, Hermes, and Eagle with new carriers in the early 30s, as they were all classified "experimental". Going by the standard displacements listed in Wiki, the carriers in service in the late 20s displaced a total of 118,830 tons, of the UK's 135,000 ton quota. Not enough displacement remained of the quota to build Ark Royal. Even though laid up, Argus was still classified as a carrier. She was taken in hand in 36 for conversion to a mother ship for target drones, which included removing her armament. As an unarmed non-combatant upon recommissioning in August 38, her tonnage became available for Ark Royal, which commissioned in December, 38. This was the same scheme the USN adopted for Langley, converting her to a seaplane tender, to free the tonnage for Wasp. Unfortunately, budget constraints in the 30s prevented the Admiralty completing their plan, replacing Hermes and Eagle with additional Ark Royal class carriers.
@gregorywright49182 жыл бұрын
Ark Royals would have been nice; the Wasp was a stupid attempt to squeeze a Yorktown down to a Ranger, and suffered for it.
@stevevalley78352 жыл бұрын
@@gregorywright4918 the USN had no choice with Wasp. They only had 15,000 tons available under the treaty, because Langley was the only one old enough to be classified as "experimental". All the treaty carriers were compromised. I have read comments that Ark Royal was lost due to inadequate compartmentalization, to save weight. The Yorktowns were compromised by not having staggered boiler and engine rooms. If Yorktown and Hornet had had staggered boiler and engine rooms, like the Essex did, they might have been able to limp away, rather than sitting, dead in the water, until the Japanese arrived to finish them off. Of course, that brings the alt history question, if Yorktown and Enterprise were built to the treaty limit at that time, 27,000, about the same as Essex, they could have had staggered boiler and engine rooms. Then we don't get Wasp, which made itself useful in the Atlantic, but was too vulnerable to survive in the Pacific. But, with a 27,000 ton design in hand, the USN may have laid down two carriers as soon as Congress authorized them in 38, so they would both be completed in 41, rather than Hornet being ready, but Essex delayed, due to the need to design from a clean sheet.
@jeebusk2 жыл бұрын
"The temporary installation of a dummy island that was moved about the flight deck" All this time I never know our video games were so realistic!
@trooperdgb97222 жыл бұрын
That was a typically brilliant line.....and what a great idea!
@hazchemel2 жыл бұрын
thanks for this Drach, I love the air of "we'll make it up as we go along" even before getting wet.
@jeebusk2 жыл бұрын
Last time I was this early, a battle-carrier seemed like a good idea.
@91Redmist2 жыл бұрын
Cool. Only early full length flight deck carrier I knew about was the USS Langley. Looks like Argus was the first.
@mpersad2 жыл бұрын
What a remarkable ship, with a hugely impressive record. Thank you Drach!
@shathriel2 жыл бұрын
Have a few books on carriers, I think her original torpedo bombers were called Cuckoos and six were sold to the imperial Japanese navy, also during WW2 she was saved by the wrong order being given during a Med convoy mission, when an enemy torpedo bomber attacked her and the officer on watch ordered a turn that would have doomed her but the rating at the steering wheel was that flustered he did the opposite whilst carrying out the exact order because of a change in wording of the order to alter the heading which he automatically did the opposite of. I'd have to find the right book again and that section to word it properly :)
@SennaAugustus2 жыл бұрын
Argus was instrumental to the war effort, one of her highlights was sending 12 Hawker Hurricanes to Malta in Operation Hurry (Club Run) and participating in Operation Pedestal (but was hindered by not being able to launch planes at night, and with Eagle sunk and Victorious on fire, leaving the British with no air cover for 4 days of battles and air raids).
@davidbirt84862 жыл бұрын
It was Indomitable that was on fire, the Vic as I recall was unscathed.
@adrianrutterford7622 жыл бұрын
Lunch and Drac. Saturday lunch sorted!
@Paludion2 жыл бұрын
For me, it's coffee and Drach, or tea when I got the mood.
@Katy_Jones2 жыл бұрын
Biplane version of Pearl Harbor? You mean the monoplane version of Taranto...
@The_Modeling_Underdog2 жыл бұрын
Admiralty: "We're running out of aircraft carriers." HMS Argus (gently pushing the door open with its cane): "Aye. Here's me new legs, laddies. Should we go and have a stroll around?"
@TheChonaman2 жыл бұрын
I know that virtually everyone who subscribed to this channel is a history nerd. Just want to shout out to you all for watching and enjoying. Incredible content, Drach. Argus is totally unknown to me until this video. Thanks for informing me!
@purleybaker2 жыл бұрын
So well put.
@smokejaguarsix77572 жыл бұрын
Isnt it amazing that a ship that started out carrying canvas covered aircraft as a proof of concept in fact ended up being a useful even important member of the fleet? Against all odds and threats she survived the war when so many of the purpose built, modern, deadlier combat vessels around her did not. Its actually impressive.
@iancarr86822 жыл бұрын
I'm not clear why the location has been selected but the bell of HMS Argus is on display in Bristol Cathedral, UK.
@byronharano23912 жыл бұрын
The evolution of the aircraft carrier in under 30 minutes. Excellent
@agesflow68152 жыл бұрын
Thank you, Drachinifel.
@thebashar2 жыл бұрын
This really cool in an unexpected way, I am presently assisting the construction of a warship named Argus, USCGC Argus.
@silverhost97822 жыл бұрын
A valuable workhorse
@richardthomas68902 жыл бұрын
What a fantastic lesson in aircraft carrier design instigated by HMS Argus
@Wallda_252 жыл бұрын
really happy to learn about this ship. Also a 1919 equivalent of Pearl Harbour at Wilhlemshafen is a fascinating "What if" to me. Primarily because, if successful, there would be a slight chance i would get to see a modern day equivalent to the arizona memorial of any potentially sunk ship to visit. Althought the wreckage of könig, kaiser or (lets be a bit dreamy about it) Mackensen would probably not have survived long enough, since germans dont like it when there is perfectly useable space left blocked by an underwater grave- and scrapyard.
@robdgaming2 жыл бұрын
Several WWI German naval vessels are still on the bottom of Scapa Flow, where they were scuttled by their crews in 1919 to prevent the British using them if the war resumed. Most of these, however, were raised and scrapped by the British in the following years.
@Wallda_252 жыл бұрын
@@robdgaming yeah i'd just love to be able to walk on one of the older battleships or even cruisers. Dont get me wrong its nice to have the U-Boats and all the civilian vessels left but at least one major military vessel from the worldwars period would be nice to have. But the cirumstances were never in favor for that to happen. So a memorial i think would have been more likely if one sank in harbour
@malcolmtaylor5182 жыл бұрын
Beardmore were an innovative heavy engineering company, entering two aircraft in the first Army aeroplane trials. Its interesting to see the efforts they made to design an early aircraft carrier, keeping the Royal Navy at the forefront of the new technology.
@Jimorian2 жыл бұрын
Love the new thumbnail format, lot of great info right up front.
@thomaskositzki94242 жыл бұрын
Wow, for one of the first aircraft carriers to serve in the RN, she certainly had a lot to do in WW2. Impressive career!
@hisdadjames48762 жыл бұрын
More identities than David Bowie and, like him, pretty effective in all of them!
@maxrobe2 жыл бұрын
I love the design method from perceived wisdom to actual wisdom. We need all these bits, OK get rid of some of the bit, right basically get rid of all the bits and just have an unobstructed landing area. (However we do need to test all these principles in situ because we do like bits).
@peterhughes70992 жыл бұрын
Thanks for adding the “evolution” of the carrier design Mr D. Good stuff as always 😊
@davidbrennan6602 жыл бұрын
She did honourable service .
@Archangelglenn2 жыл бұрын
I want to see a video on HMS Unicorn. The support carrier. Or the heavy cruiser HMS London.
@kentbarnes19552 жыл бұрын
That was truly fascinating. Thanks Drac! I knew of Argus, but had forgotten she survived WW2. I have found they have a 1/700 scale model kit available. Doing one (as I know many have) of her in that Dazzle Camo scheme would be unique. I might have to look into scratch building something larger. Thanks again.
@SynchroScore Жыл бұрын
I like this first picture for the anachronism. You have an airplane, but you also have a crane that's powered by a separate vertical boiler, like contemporary construction equipment.
@bobbenson68252 жыл бұрын
I just finished my first re-reading of Norman Polmar's "Aircraft Carriers" (published 1969) in nearly 50 years. I nearly wore that book out rereading it in my teens. So I loved the synchronicity of this popping up as the first Drach video after I was done.
@pierz8822 жыл бұрын
The most beautiful aircraft carrier finally gets her just attention. Splendid video.
@joaoalbertodosanjosgomes15362 жыл бұрын
Excellent channel.
@darrellsmith42042 жыл бұрын
Hard to believe it took 318 guides to get to Argus.
@PizzaTreeYT2 жыл бұрын
The dazzle camouflage pattern in HMS Furious at 2:17 is absolutely dope.
@imouse32462 жыл бұрын
That's quite a career.
@robdgaming2 жыл бұрын
Argus seems to have had a charmed life, Malta runs were very risky from what I've heard.
@phaasch2 жыл бұрын
A truely pioneering ship, which proved to be worth it's weight in gold, not only showing the RN and the rest of the world the way forward from WW1, but got to see out a good slice of front line work in it's later years, too.
@katrinapaton52832 жыл бұрын
And yet the Japanese, even after Hosho, managed to get it SO badly wrong with Kaga and Akagi.
@kenjackson56852 жыл бұрын
Just remarkable...Thank-you for sharing
@stuartaaron6132 жыл бұрын
A nice video about "Old Flatiron."
@timonsolus2 жыл бұрын
The poor old Argus should never have been forced into front line combat service in WW2 - but the loss of the fleet carriers HMS Courageous in 1939 and HMS Glorious in 1940 made it unavoidable, as the Royal Navy was desperately short of flight decks while fighting a multi-ocean war.
@Cailus35422 жыл бұрын
In WW2, if a ship had a flight deck (or could have a flight deck jammed on top), it was more precious than diamonds. That became less of an issue in 1944/45 as the Allies had entire armadas of the things, but it was critical in 1942/43 in every ocean.
@rmyerscmi2 жыл бұрын
Certainly got their money’s worth out of that ship! Great vid.
@stewartellinson88462 жыл бұрын
Fascinating
@jimtalbott95352 жыл бұрын
Her hangar bay reminds me of a Roro vehicle ferry - dang big space!
@ExplodingLiger2 жыл бұрын
Love the new thumbnails
@peterblood502 жыл бұрын
I guess not every wartime ship had a commendable combat record. Some had to handle the more mundane tasks, but still worthy of recognition for the duties performed.
@siquq2 жыл бұрын
I love HMS Argus!
@nigeldeacon32712 жыл бұрын
Interesting, about 10 years ago I was at a school in Hampshire which had HMS Argus bell which had apparently been given to the school by an ex CO. Perhaps she had more than one bell during her interesting career.
@johnfisher96922 жыл бұрын
An amazing ship really, starting life as a cruise ship and then being the first of the true aircraft carriers
@JohnThomas-gy6lq2 жыл бұрын
Great job as always!
@TomLuTon2 жыл бұрын
"Dummy Island that was moved around the flight deck" Got this image of it being moved around like a piece of furniture "Left. LEFT! No, the other left! Now pivot!"(or would that be 'port' and 'come about'?)
@I_am_Phil_Lee2 жыл бұрын
Well, as a dummy used just to test the effects on wind turbulence, it was probably wood and canvas, so you may not be all that wide of the mark. The Royal Navy has a history of achieving improbable feats with pure manpower and the astute use of leverage and tackles, so a few men using sheerlegs and a block or two may have been exactly how it was done. If you have seen the gun run you will realise that wheels are just another part to be carried!
@buckfaststradler46292 жыл бұрын
My grandfather worked at Beardmore's in Clydebank during WW1 - thus avoiding potentially fatal service on the Western Front.
@LordEvan52 жыл бұрын
A pleasure as usual
@DVDFGlenCo2 жыл бұрын
Impressive career
@captain00802 жыл бұрын
Interesting, didnt know wind tunnels were a thing that early or that they were used for ships.
@randomnickify2 жыл бұрын
Wright brothers created first wind tunnel even before their first flight, wind tunnels were a thing since before the begining :) Using them on aircraft carriers seems kind of obvious.
@captain00802 жыл бұрын
@@randomnickify Interesting.
@chrissouthgate45542 жыл бұрын
@@randomnickify I believe they had to blow cigarette smoke into the (small) tunnel to show airflow.
@ccalthrop63472 жыл бұрын
Interestingly, RFA Argus, which I’ve previously sailed aboard, is moored about two hundred yards from where I’m listening to this.
@BattleshipWarspite2 жыл бұрын
It is amazingly how Britain invented the world, First Aircraft carrier, HMS Furious, HMS Argus, HMS Vindictive, we seem one evolution. HMS Furious - first Aircraft carrier HMS Argus - First carrier to have full-length flight deck. HMS Hermes - First carrier to have control tower, Hurricane Bow. HMS M2 - First Submarine Aircraft carrier. HMS Courageous - First carrier to have hydraulic catapult Illustrious class first Armoured flight deck carrier HMS Illustrious - First carrier to have mirror-landing system HMS Ocean - First carrier to have successful naval jet Sea Vampire. HMS Perseus - First carrier to have Steam catapult HMS Triumph - First carrier to have Angled Flight deck Queen Elizabeth class - First Twin Tower Carrier.
@mikearmstrong84832 жыл бұрын
First ship to be designed and built as an aircraft carrier, instead of a knock up of something else: IJN Hosho.
@BattleshipWarspite2 жыл бұрын
@mikearmstrong8483 Hōshō was initially designed as a seaplane carrier like HMS Campania with a forward flying-off deck, 32 aircraft, four low-angle 14-centimeter (5.5 in) guns, and four anti-aircraft (AA) guns. The plan was revised after reports were received from Japanese observers with the Royal Navy in Europe about the desirability to be able to land aircraft on the ship. The new requirements were modeled on HMS Furious after she received her rear flight deck in 1918. The ship was to be capable of 30 knots (56 km/h; 35 mph) and fitted with a forward flight deck, island and funnels amidships, and a large hangar aft. Shortly thereafter based on observations of landing trials on Furious and HMS Argus, the world's first flush-decked aircraft carrier, Hōshō's flight deck design was revised in April 1919. The island was removed and the funnels were moved to one side to create an unobstructed, full-length flight deck, and the ship was reclassified as an aircraft carrier. The ship's hull was based on that of a large cruiser and she was given a small island. Her three funnels were mounted on the starboard side and swiveled to lie horizontal during flight operations. Hōshō's designed speed was reduced to 25 knots (46 km/h; 29 mph), based on British experiences during World War I.
@boobah56432 жыл бұрын
Re: _Queen Elizabeth_ Not the first twin tower carrier; as mentioned in this video, however, none of them stayed that way because when you put the towers on either side of the flight deck flight operations get... exciting. Also, still not seeing how that is any sort of improvement over one, larger tower. Not seeing it as worse, either, but as some sort of improvement? I've been waiting over a decade for an explanation why the _Venator_ wasn't a stupid design.
@alexandermonro67682 жыл бұрын
I wouldn't really consider HMS M2 as a great success. Perhaps best quietly forgotten...
@WALTERBROADDUS2 жыл бұрын
@@boobah5643 if you're asking about the Queen Elizabeth-class? Basically, you're splitting the functions navigation and Air traffic control. For each operation, you better want to be in different locations. Air traffic control and spotting is better done aft. The ship handling is better done at a position forward.
@AW-hj4eh Жыл бұрын
My father served on the Argus in WWII. I remember him telling me that one of her nicknames was "The Floating Coffin"
@comentedonakeyboard2 жыл бұрын
Impressive ship👍
@nigeldeforrest-pearce80842 жыл бұрын
Fascinating!!!
@jasonz77882 жыл бұрын
greatwork thank you
@Cbabilon6752 жыл бұрын
The longest lasting escort carriers that I've heard of.
@fhlostonparaphrase2 жыл бұрын
Huh, a planned 1919 air-raid on Wilhelmshaven with carriers? Interesting! Also, it turns out I've been mixing up Argus with Hermes...
@jlvfr2 жыл бұрын
Amazing longevity.
@MattVF2 жыл бұрын
Hey Drach, Can you cover the loss of HMS Glorious? I’d be interested on your take on this debacle!
@llllib2 жыл бұрын
Just to be sure you know about this one, right? kzbin.info/www/bejne/nYeVZqRsZbibrJo By the way I think I have recollection of Drach covering this topic, but can't immediately find it. It may not have been at his channel but bilge pumps, or maybe it's part of drydock. Or maybe I'm mistaken and it was someone else.
@MattVF2 жыл бұрын
@@llllib I’ve seen that. To be honest though there is soooo much more to that catastrophe
@llllib2 жыл бұрын
@@MattVF Yep. Could be what I recall was on Armoured carriers.
@marktuffield65192 жыл бұрын
Ben-My-Chree, or woman of my heart, the Chree is I think, pronounced like Kree. Perhaps a native Manx speaker can confirm? It is my favourite ship of WW1 because of the amazing people who served on board her, was there ever a ship with men like Samson, Longmore, Childers and Benn on the roster? The excellent book by Ian M. Burns telling the tale of her adventures can be found on the Cross & Cockade International website, or if you prefer the Society's uninspiring new name try the Great War Aviation Society 🙂
@jimkinnoir61312 жыл бұрын
Think the ships bell is in Bristol industrial museum
@Peterax7882 жыл бұрын
Good info Drac, is it possible to make a video on HMS Chaser the light aircraft carrier?
@fourteenfour12 жыл бұрын
Amazing how small these look relative to the aircraft on their decks.
@triumph_spitfire_25862 жыл бұрын
Bless the old girl for nearly lasting 30 years in service. Yet another great loss in regards to it's scrapping
@wideyxyz22712 жыл бұрын
My dad was on this ship for a short while. He was billeted on her whilst on a re training stint in Chatham.
@Draythur2 жыл бұрын
white ensign flag for the navy is a nice touch
@pistonar2 жыл бұрын
Sold for scrap. 3 words that you wish didn't apply to some of these ships. She would have been, like most of the British ships on display I've been on, an amazing museum.
@animal163652 жыл бұрын
Didn't Argus have supports running down the middle of the hanger deck?? I remember reading about that in a book call (Illistrated guide to Aircraft carriers of the world).
@bytesback.2 жыл бұрын
You can see the hanger in this video kzbin.info/www/bejne/hHfbn4lmj86UrLs
@sadwingsraging3044 Жыл бұрын
She served well in all of her duties right up till the end. 07
@inyobill2 жыл бұрын
I had no idea that a WW I era carrieir was active in the second war.
@bakaneko1132 жыл бұрын
"Whereupon she was sold for scrap." Right in the feels.
@blueboats75302 жыл бұрын
The huge lifts and high hanger makes me think that in the time of sticks and fabric the only way to have an actual payload was to make the aircraft far larger
@lawrencewestby92292 жыл бұрын
It sounds like the Admiralty got its money's worth out of Argus. She answered the call to any use they wanted made of her.
@WALTERBROADDUS2 жыл бұрын
The Russians wish they had a carrier that good.
@lewisirwin53632 жыл бұрын
Jeez, I'm hopeless- the first thing I did when I saw the title was start humming *Ween* :P
@edwardgilmour90132 жыл бұрын
The twin Islands on either side of the Deck and a deliberate Wind tunnel seems to have more relevance for land modern planes on a non-catapult carrier.
@adventuresinmodelrailroading2 жыл бұрын
Imagine being the first bridge crew and having aircraft flying off just above you.
@fooman21082 жыл бұрын
Some sources I've read described her as the first escort carrier
@johnforsyth79872 жыл бұрын
Thank you for another very informative video on a ship I knew about before. But your video has certainly deepened my knowledge about HMS Argus. Do you know what happened to the other mid-sized ocean liner that was incomplete at this time?
@Tundraviper412 жыл бұрын
I wonder if he will do a video on the USS Wolverine, one of two great lakes aircraft carriers.
@floydvaughn96662 жыл бұрын
Go to The History Guy.
@floydvaughn96662 жыл бұрын
You Tube it. History Guy, I think has it.
@floydvaughn96662 жыл бұрын
I'm back! USS Wolverine is on Dark Seas and about 5 more video sites. I didn't know until now, but she had a sister ship, USS Sable. So there were 2 of them. You're welcome.
@jeffblacky2 жыл бұрын
I built the model kit Then later added a bridge from the Kaga And funnel from KG5 battleship Called it Fargus
@frednone2 жыл бұрын
Did the Americans or Japanese do any of the island placement experiments with Langly and Hosho, or was it more, "Lets put the Island, ummmm..., there?
@vectorbrony34732 жыл бұрын
Pilot: We've caught the High Seas fleet napping in port! Get ready for the attack and send back the flag signal "Tally-ho, Tally-ho, Tally-ho"
@trooperdgb97222 жыл бұрын
Best comment yet!
@Doc_Tar2 жыл бұрын
I'd say the Brits got their investment back and more with Argus.
@1pierosangiorgio2 жыл бұрын
Campania, Engadine... Britain has so many ships it had to name them after foreign's countries regions, mythological creatures, etc.
@gar64462 жыл бұрын
Just imagine if The Great Eastern had made it till 1914 and was converted to a Carrier.
@cmck4722 жыл бұрын
If Brunel had been involved, it probably would have had cast-iron airplanes on it! 😊
@patrickwentz84132 жыл бұрын
She lived a good warriors life. She did not deserve her fate.
@madcyclist582 жыл бұрын
Another historically important British ship that wasn't preserved. But I suppose there were so many that we couldn't have kept them all. I wish we'd kept at least one battleship though.
@TheWebstaff2 жыл бұрын
When you see these flat tops straight on I always think it looks like they ran them under a low bridge.