HMS Dreadnought, the first dreadnought battleship and game changer for the British Royal Navy, is today's subject. Want to support the channel? - / drachinifel Want to talk about ships? / discord Music - / ncmepicmusic
Пікірлер: 519
@matthewrobinson43235 жыл бұрын
Much better in your human voice. It's like the difference between HMS Dreadnought and previous battleships.
@eatthisvr65 жыл бұрын
@mike force if only it existed
@eatthisvr65 жыл бұрын
@mike force prove it Oh wait you can't because it's not real
@eatthisvr65 жыл бұрын
@mike force proove hell exists, gravity, atoms etc have already been prooven. as usual the insults come out early to deflect from the complete lack of any coherant argument. ps what is a dumbakk? thats a new 1 to me
@eatthisvr65 жыл бұрын
@mike force demonstrate the existence of hell please. you still cant do it no matter how much you attempt to deflect by attacking my admittedly poor grammer. gravity is really easy to demonstrate, simply drop something. gravity is the force that makes an object travel towards the centre of mass (of earth in this case)
@eatthisvr65 жыл бұрын
@mike force 1 i have answered you. 2 you STILL havnt answered me, il ask you again. give me any evidence whatsoever to back your claim that hell exists
@amandafranks51085 жыл бұрын
A time when Britain could Build a Battleship in 4 months, now it takes longer than that to fill in a pothole.
@jrd335 жыл бұрын
Not just "build a battleship", but build a revolutionary battleship, the biggest and best armed battleship in the world (briefly). Those were the days...
@matthewrobinson43234 жыл бұрын
I don't know how the potholes are in Britain, but here in Indianapolis we use our potholes for air raid shelters. 😄
@eljanrimsa58433 жыл бұрын
@@matthewrobinson4323 Who is raiding Indianapolis?
@matthewrobinson43233 жыл бұрын
@@eljanrimsa5843 Just for drills, as in the 1950's when we hid under our desks in school.
@MaxwellAerialPhotography3 жыл бұрын
Oh how the mighty have fallen.
@bobrobert11235 жыл бұрын
Those French ships look like floating industrial parks
@7thsealord8885 жыл бұрын
Gets worse. At that time, the French authorities simply could not agree, or decide, on anything regarding their battleships. Every French battleship built in that era would be subjected to multiple major design changes WHILE BEING BUILT, and that insanity would continue even after launch, with new technology being crammed in or on pretty much on a whim. It is said that, at this time, the French Navy's battle line was not so much a fleet as a collection of prototypes.
@7thsealord8885 жыл бұрын
Just realised I didn't make one thing clear. This mania for radical redesign and alteration was NOT done by class as one might expect, but on an individual ship basis.. So even ships of the same (alleged) class would have major differences.
@bkjeong43025 жыл бұрын
7thsealord French Predreadnoughts tick all the boxes for being useless capital ships. Obsolete on launch? Check. Prone to capsizing? Check. Structurally unsound? Check. High risk of flooding? Check. Horrible armament design? Check. Horrible armour design? Check. Use of new, untested and often pointless technology? Check. Ugly as sin? Check. There are many capital ships that have one or two of the same problems but none of the others have ALL of these problems.
@bigblue69175 жыл бұрын
I always thought they were designed by people who never actually saw a battleship.
@jeffreytam76845 жыл бұрын
That’s an extremely generous assessment
@snakes34255 жыл бұрын
Admiral Fisher: We've done it. Now all the battleships in the world are obsolete including our...own...ships....D'OH!!!!
@bkjeong43025 жыл бұрын
snakes3425 And little did he know that his new invention would a) help trigger WWI (though it was inevitable at that point, he made it worse), and b) become obsolete in the 1930s.
@snakes34254 жыл бұрын
@@bkjeong4302 Admiral Fisher: D'OH!!!! D'OH!!!!
@boobah56434 жыл бұрын
As pointed out in the video, _Dreadnought_ was not the first or even second dreadnought to begin construction, just the first to get done. If Fisher hadn't rushed _Dreadnought_ all the British battleships end up obsolete... instead of all save one.
@richardmalcolm14574 жыл бұрын
Well, just remember: "obsolete" is not necessarily the same as "useless." If war had broken out with Germany on January 1, 1907. the RN could quite capably set up a blockade, or fight a general action with its clouds of pre-dreadnoughts. "Obsolescence " was rather notional until there really were significant numbers of dreadnoughts in operation.
@DaveSCameron3 жыл бұрын
@@richardmalcolm1457 Glad you pointed this out as far too many seem to believe that all previous shipping is cannon fodder...
@dayaautum69834 жыл бұрын
HMS Dreadnought: I make all battleships before me obsolete! The Airplane: Hold my beer
@trajan2313 жыл бұрын
You mean the Aircraft Carrier
@dayaautum69833 жыл бұрын
@@trajan231 No, I meant the airplane. One can make a silly argument as to which one should be thought of as making a battleship obsolete. But my comment references the period of Dreadnoughts glory days (1905), and by the time an aircraft carrier hit the water, (1918 for a full deck) the HMS dreadnought was already made obsolete by superdreadnoughts (1910). The airplane however, was already flying (1903) and militaries around the world were already considering their use in warfare. Therefore, the outcome of such an aforementioned silly argument is irrelevant, and once again... No. I meant an airplane.
@stevequerin25043 жыл бұрын
Also, it is the Airplane that does that Attacking. The Aircraft Carrier says, "Okay, Airplanes, you take on that Battleship over there; and, I will just sit here safely out of Combat Distance from that Battleship.".
@dayaautum69833 жыл бұрын
@@stevequerin2504 I'm quite sure that the sailors and airmen who fought those battles didn't have such useless debates over whether it was the carrier or the planes, especially since there are no airmen or sailors who were delusional enough to ever think the carrier was ever "sitting safely" during a time of war. The entire point to my last response was to simply put an end to such a foolish comparison. I sincerely apologize to the Navy (both pilots and sailors) for failing to do so....
@stevequerin25043 жыл бұрын
@@dayaautum6983 ... HMS Dreadnought: I make all Battleships before me obsolete! The Airplane: Hold my beer (My Assumption) The Airplane is going to attack HMS Dreadnought to make HMS Dreadnought an obsolete Warship Design. Aircraft Carrier: Okay, Airplanes, you attack that Battleship over there; and, I will sit here safely out of Combat Distance from that Battleship. (My Assumption) Your Airplane was launched from my Aircraft Carrier to attack HMS Dreadnought. In essence, my Original Reply was in support of your Original Posting. ¿What? ¿You have Proprietary over your Original Joke that Mark Andrew didn't catch onto? whatever
@jlvfr5 жыл бұрын
"... cheaper than some iPhones." :D :D :D
@oceanblue225 жыл бұрын
Got to be my favorite narrator of all my podcasts. A great combination of clear voice, perfect syntax pronunciation, subtle snobbiness combined with a pinch of humor I love it
@mattblom39905 жыл бұрын
Subtle snobbiness is just British humour ;)
@pedrorocha4817 Жыл бұрын
"Unopposed under crimson skies Immortalized, over time their legend will rise And their foes can't believe their eyes, believe their size, as they fall And the dreadnoughts dread nothing at all"
@jorgegawlik868111 ай бұрын
Ahh, Sabaton 😃😃😃
@trevorday79238 ай бұрын
Ahhhh, Sabaton. Good taste there 👍🏻
@tokenfinnishguy87145 жыл бұрын
A ship so badass it sunk a submarine by ramming it
@BHuang925 жыл бұрын
The ONLY battleship in history to sink a submarine.............
@keysontrains5385 жыл бұрын
The RMS (or HMTS atm i guess) Olympic?
@Nuke893455 жыл бұрын
@Golden Eagle She tried to ram the u-boat but fail. Edit: in my rush to type how incorrect your statement is, I myself am wrong as Warspite did sink a submarine in ww2. You are right there. I thought it was her own attempt to ram but fail to sink a German u-boat in WW1 you meant. Silly me.
@cnlbenmc5 жыл бұрын
Ramming speed!
@DawnOfTheDead9915 жыл бұрын
Cargo ships sank subs by ramming
@johngregory48015 жыл бұрын
"And the warranty was not voided in the mere presence of water, so there is that..." The first Drachism? (snirk, snirk)
@rooksfoot11844 жыл бұрын
i cant believe that was the first sarcastic or well informed quip he ever made.. but if so u documented it.... nice one ...if ur new to channel be prepared for more.. much more
@johngregory48014 жыл бұрын
@@rooksfoot1184 The first one on this video.
@rooksfoot11844 жыл бұрын
@@johngregory4801 ok so its episode by episode...maybe we need a counter in the bottom left a a loud ping sound when one is added.... :) full length of the channel.. with the kamchakta double bill sounding lik a pinball machine.... would be an amazing timelapse ...all the best
@jayfrank19133 жыл бұрын
A bit dated by now..
@shingshongshamalama4 жыл бұрын
Royal Navy: *builds the most decorated warship of all time, in any navy, ever* Royal Navy: *sells that shit for scrap*
@luisitobardajibenitez80134 жыл бұрын
It's not the most decorated RN ship ever, it is the most influential. And sadly maintaining warships is a hobby of voracious appetite on the finance part of things.
@Aelvir1144 жыл бұрын
Satsuma was affected by the Dreadnought but she was TECHNICALLY a “Semi-Dreadnought”, the IJN’s first was the Kawachi-class.
@vikkimcdonough6153 Жыл бұрын
_Satsuma_ was _designed_ with a uniform main battery, but was built as a semidreadnought due to a shortage of really big guns.
@Wolfeson289 ай бұрын
This suddenly popped up on my feed. No idea why this one in particular, but there was no way I could not click on it. :) Keep up the awesome work, Drach.
@snakes34255 жыл бұрын
Admiral Fisher: We now have the most powerful battleship ever built Guy: Uh Admiral it seems someone put the gun director and the fire control room behind the forward funnel Admiral Fisher: D'OH!!!!!
@tnbspotter53605 жыл бұрын
I like the steampunk design of the French battleship. It looks like something that would fly or go back in time if slightly upgraded.
@marckyle5895 Жыл бұрын
What The Holy Fuck Was That Thing???
@bkjeong4302 Жыл бұрын
@@marckyle5895 The Massena. Probably the worst battleship ever built.
@nostalgicsparrow41698 ай бұрын
Fly? You mean sink to the sea floor by just a more well designed battleship sneezing in it’s general direction
@needude72185 жыл бұрын
HMS Thunder Child definitely needs a review. Everybody should know the tale of her sacrifice in the face of 3 mighty threats No rush though, I wouldn't mind waiting until, let's say, early April to watch a video about it
@CaptainJetstream5 жыл бұрын
Moving swiftly through the waters Cannons blazing as she came Brought a might metal war-lord Crashing down in sheets of flame
@nerdzy84545 жыл бұрын
Maybe, if he doesn't want to honor the brave souls that died aboard that valiant ship for some reason, we could get him to review the HMS Polyphemus instead. The two ships were pretty similar, after all.
@themisspultone5 жыл бұрын
@@CaptainJetstream Sensing victory was nearing Thinking fortune must have smiled People started cheering "Come on Thunder Child"
@paolobellomi80564 жыл бұрын
Wait a minute... kzbin.info/www/bejne/poKlpqGabdp_o9E ...published... April 1st... Gentleman, we have found a trolling time traveler
@DaveSCameron3 жыл бұрын
@@nerdzy8454 or HMS Thetis?
@Johnnycdrums5 жыл бұрын
Ex- Navy here; Tumblehome design scares the living crap out of me, and I care not who builds it. Great channel, and I mean it; Drachinifel.
@davidtoyne32245 жыл бұрын
I have seen the photo of Dreadnought (at 1:47) many times. I have just realised, that although she is at sea, and at speed, there is a sailor calmly walking along the top of the torpedo netting boom, on the outside of the hull!
@zxjim5 жыл бұрын
While that would be cool, if you look closer, he's on the deck. The front hull of Dreadnought was cut down to allow a forward firing arc for the two side turrets. If you follow past that sailor's head, you can make out a hatch just after the second porthole.
@JohnRodriguesPhotographer5 жыл бұрын
Love the IPhone analogy!!!
@Boxghost1024 жыл бұрын
Imagine you're that U-boat captain. You surface in your tin can and suddenly there's two giant battleships bearing down on you to ram. Terrifying.
@thehandoftheking33143 жыл бұрын
@boxghost102 Royal navy: *sees periscope* "WWWWWAAAAAARRRRRGHHH!!!
@hanzzel60864 ай бұрын
@@thehandoftheking3314Nah, that's the Flower class, regardless of who was manning them (but especially the Canadians. "Captain, there is a U-boat twice our size to starboard, orders!?" " *RAM IT* !!" ).They where such cute little balls of fury and death!
@spookyshadowhawk67765 жыл бұрын
The British built Dreadnought while the French built Dreadfulls, the Industrial Park Aproch to Battleship Design. I liked the I Phone reference! How many people can you carry across the World on a I Phone and as a Missile can be locked on both a I Phone and a Battleship, it's not hard to decide which I'd rather be behind or on!
@SeeLasSee2 жыл бұрын
iPhones are waterproof now and have been for some years.
@jfrorn5 жыл бұрын
I actually love those pre-dreadnoughts, It'd be great to see more info on that type!
@GEV6465 жыл бұрын
Those French pre-dreadnoughts are so hideous I can't help but love them.
@automandan5 жыл бұрын
Ok did he just compared an IPhone to a battleship? 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 I like that.
@vaultboy7305 жыл бұрын
I mean can you shell jerry bastards with an iPhone
@michaelmoorrees35855 жыл бұрын
Remember the Samsung Galaxy Note 7, could go BOOM too ! www.forbes.com/sites/jvchamary/2016/09/04/samsung-note7-battery/
@deltavee25 жыл бұрын
Yes he did and quite adroitly at that. I like his humour.
@renown63865 жыл бұрын
I would rather have dreadnought than 1000 iPhone's
@calimdonmorgul72064 жыл бұрын
If a IPhone is a Battleship what would a Nokia be?
@warrenlehmkuhleii84725 жыл бұрын
A ship so awesome, all succeeding battleships of a similar design would be named after it.
@ronlynquist91835 жыл бұрын
I like French battleships. They have a kind of steam punk look.
@orangelion035 жыл бұрын
They look less seaworthy than Hashima =)
@CaesarInVa5 жыл бұрын
I know...they're so frigging weird you can't help but look.
@ur2c85 жыл бұрын
I think William Heath Robinson had a hand in the design work.
@monarchtherapsidsinostran91255 жыл бұрын
like steampunk in the weird, and unnecessary complicated looking way?
@ronlynquist91835 жыл бұрын
@@monarchtherapsidsinostran9125 The french navy had a concept called fierce face that they incorporated in to battleship design. They thought if you make a ship look imposing it will effect the morale of the enemy. Like all ideas like this it's effectiveness is problematic.
@eatthisvr65 жыл бұрын
iv just bought a 700 scale kit, time to get building although itl probably take me longer to buiild it than the real 1 lol
@johnchambers29965 жыл бұрын
The major advance was that all those big guns were director controlled for ranging and aiming; they fired as a unit, not as separate turrets.
@timmy38223 жыл бұрын
I always feel like it's a criminal waste that we have so few museum ships. Aside from HMS Belfast there are no examples of our maritime past preserved from this age of naval warfare. Even HMS Warspite, the most celebrated battleship we ever had couldn't be saved for future generations. At least the Japanese were persuaded to preserve the Mikasa, that's something I would very much love to visit some day.
@KatyushaLauncher3 жыл бұрын
It's not a criminal waste if Britain itself can't keep them, they simply couldn't afford to keep them as they were broke
@hanzzel60864 ай бұрын
I'm afraid I have to take small offense to your statement that the Japanese where "persuaded" to save the Mikasa. This is due to how they fought tooth and nail to have her exempted from *that* treaty (the Washington Naval Treaty).
@CorePathway4 ай бұрын
Remember the Warspite
@Crunkboy4154 жыл бұрын
It's funny. In the same decade the dreadnought was being created, another weapon was created which would make it obsolete in a lot of ways: the airplane.
@harryrcarmichael5 жыл бұрын
Love the I-Phone comparison
@admiraltiberius19895 жыл бұрын
Love your videos... especially the attention to detail and the humor you put in them.
@revengefullobster45245 жыл бұрын
Very glad you decided to narrate. It's much more personal and gives the videos a nice tone. Your humour was also brilliant. Great job.
@murderouskitten25775 жыл бұрын
three vids in one day , man you are too good to us today ;)
@skyhager59532 жыл бұрын
Honestly, I like the way French pre-dreadnoughts look
@MichalSoukup19955 жыл бұрын
Looks at Dreadnough and says in stern voice "Shame on you, shame on you... Now be a good ship and give these turrets back to Lord Nelson and Agammemnon..."
@kennethdeanmiller7324 Жыл бұрын
Some other channel had a video about HMS Dreadnought. I clicked on it thinking it was your "five min guide" and of course was quickly disappointed. So I had to close that video & find yours. And that was when I realized it was the very first one you made. And now I'm about to watch it. Glad you redone these in your own voice btw.
@DaveSCameron2 жыл бұрын
Epic channel, followed for years now and just gets better. 👍
@lancerevell59794 жыл бұрын
An excellent bit of naval history. And thankyou for the real human voice!
@chedelirio69844 жыл бұрын
Becuse of course, *hitting* the enemy, is *very* important. See exhibit A (Invincible disintegrating) This is what I love about this channel.
@voiceofraisin37785 жыл бұрын
Okay when are you doing an episode on French battleship concepts? Because i'm willing to bet a lot of Absinthe was involved!
@Drachinifel5 жыл бұрын
Eventually :)
@ZerokillerOppel14 жыл бұрын
You know...the whole Absynthe thing was hyped at the time right? It's demise began with some French farmer who, under the influence of a lot of beer, hard liquour and a few shots of Absynthe killed his family with a rifle in a frenzy. The teatotalling movement then seized the opportunity to ban Absynthe all together scape goating the product. Truth of the matter was, Absynthe was no better or worse then any alcoholic beverage of the day and certainly didn't maken people insane...sorry for the free history lesson you didn't asked for but I just had to mention it...now..back on the subject of those insane castle-like French pre-dreadnoughts🤔
@rooksfoot11844 жыл бұрын
so thats why it had a banned status thx
@tz87853 жыл бұрын
@@ZerokillerOppel1 Well, at 70+% ABV, green Absinthe is one of the stronger spirits usually available (it has to be to remain green when that green comes from chlorophyll) and back then the bad stuff could be dyed with all sorts of "fun" stuff like (somewhat toxic) copper compounds, but thujone is/was just a hype. In fact, today's limitations can actually be considered counterproductive since some producers advertise the thujone content and to them, the maximum allowable amount is something to aim for.
@ZerokillerOppel13 жыл бұрын
@@tz8785 Ok. Thank you for that info!!
@cheesenoodles83165 жыл бұрын
I think that was the best 7 minutes on the Dreadnought I have heard....and seen. A novice on war ships but greatly interested. Never toured a war ship that did not dazzel me.
@GetDougDimmadomed2 жыл бұрын
1:12 That looks like something out of Dishonored. Also the iPhone roast is priceless.
@christopherluketopher37455 жыл бұрын
Im a big fan and love the history of each battle ship. Wondering if you could do a little history on a gorgeous ship HMS Alexandria. Great job on your videos and look forward to each episode
@Boxghost1024 жыл бұрын
Hey Drach, I was showing my dad this video. When he saw the picture of the French Pre-dreadnought he spent about five minutes going "What the fuck is that?" over and over.
@SkylersRants5 жыл бұрын
The Brits really know how to name ships.
@zacharyzier3144 жыл бұрын
There a real simplistic grace to these original dreadnought battleships. Love ‘em.
@markwinward5005 жыл бұрын
Could you do an overview of the Japanese pre-dreadnought battleship Mikasa - incidentally, the only surviving example of a British built battleship.
@bb54321abc4 жыл бұрын
It amazed me how quickly they built it!
@JohnRodriguesPhotographer Жыл бұрын
Every time I hear your iPhone analogy to a battleship, it just cracks me up. I'm not a fan of iPhones myself not because of the hardware but because of the business practices of Apple. But I just thought I'd let you know you gave me a giggle
@TheNinjaDC5 жыл бұрын
It makes sense US & Japan started Dreadnought style ships before the UK, as both had more recent naval wars, and got to see which of those debated ship design choices that surrounded Pre-Dreadnought ships, were most effective.
@kurumi3942 жыл бұрын
tbf "Dreadnought" is an infinitely cooler name than "South Carolina" or "Kawachi" I can't imagine calling pre dreadnoughts or super dreadnoughts something like "pre South Carolinas" or 'Super Kawachis" lol
@chasemathis2016 Жыл бұрын
@@kurumi394 I don't really know what Kawachi means, but it sounds kinda cool I guess.
@7thsealord8885 жыл бұрын
Good video. LOVED the comparison between Dreadnoughts and Iphones.
@carriertaiyo26945 жыл бұрын
It's raining human voiced videos! I have never been happier! :D
@randomuser54435 жыл бұрын
1:16, draw me like one of your French girls
@EdMcF15 жыл бұрын
1' 12" Had you not said what it was, I would have assumed an early Monitor had mated an Edwardian cruise liner, with that as the offspring.
@raigarmullerson48382 жыл бұрын
Gonna start binge watching this. Wish me luck
@EmperorNefarious14 жыл бұрын
Build a battleship famous for its game changing gun layout/choices. Most memorable kill: Rammed... Oh irony, never change
@Segalmed5 жыл бұрын
One thing you should have mentioned is that the commander of the Uboat was Otto Weddigen, the guy who sank three (obsolete) British cruisers in a single hour early in the war which made him a national hero in Germany and added extra fuel to the discussion about whether large and expensive dreadnoughts were becoming obsolete themselves.
@johnnash51184 жыл бұрын
Although the HMS Dreadnaught was considered "revolutionary" to battleship evolution with firsts in turbine propulsion and all-big-gun main armament, it was more so a product of a British ship building industry second to none, speedy assembly capabilities, and prioritized funding. Per lessons learned from the Battle of the Yellow Sea in Feb. 1904, the IJN ordered construction of the battleship Satsuma in Nov. 1904, and laid her down on 15 May, 1905 (5 months before the HMS Dreadnaught) as an all-big-gun battleship with (6) twin 12" turrets, later reduced to (4) 12" and (6) 10" twin turrets, due to shortages and cost. Thus, the HMS Dreadnaught was revolutionary, but not the impetus to evolution, that recognition goes to the Battle of the Yellow Sea, and the 14,000 yard 12" main gunnery ranges of the Russian and Japanese Pre-Satsuma battleships. As revolutionary as the HMS Dreadnaught was, the USS South Carolina, BB26 was even more. However, she wasn't laid down until Dec. 1906 (14 months after the HMS Dreadnaught.) Had Congressional approval of the naval appropriations not been delayed, and had the Royal Navy not been able to build the Dreadnought within a year, the USS Michigan or the USS South Carolina may have given their name to a new type of battleship, for they embodied a quantum leap in offensive firepower. Their chief virtue lay in the efficiently logical layout of the armament- (4) 12" twin turrets on the centreline with the inner turrets super-firing over the outer turrets. This meant that they had the same broadside as the Dreadnought, but without the space and weight penalties imposed by having wing turrets, thus saving up to 1000 tons, and their space distributable to other areas. On the other hand, the U.S. Navy elected not to gamble on the as yet proven Parsons turbine, and thus retained the conventional reciprocating triple expansion powerplants. In actuality, the battleship revolution was shared by three ship classes between three nations, the IJN (first to order and lay down an all-big-gun armament.) the RN (first to commission an all-big-gun armament, and first turbine propulsion,) and the USN (first super-firing all-big-gun armement- Thereafter copied by nearly every subsequent battleship designed.) The RN however, should be recognized by having the most efficient and formidable ship building industry of its day, which enabled the HMS Dreadnaught to come in first, after giving the USN and IJN a head start. It's still a good thing, I couldn't imagine "South Carolina" or "Pre-South Carolina" sticking very well; although, Pre-Satsuma does sound pretty good. Cheers!
@captjim0074 жыл бұрын
Awesome job
@drmoss_ca4 жыл бұрын
45 years ago, when I was a med student at UCH, the ancient basement Gents toilets had urinals marked "Dreadnought". Always made me smile as I peed!
@tomlarham82333 жыл бұрын
Thank God for the human voice; far more distinguished than the generic-robo voice.
@oceanriderz655 жыл бұрын
would you be so kind and do a review of the lesser known Austro-Hungarian Navy? i am impressed by the historical details you present
@johncook31255 жыл бұрын
Interesting article as usual,
@anthropicandroid44942 жыл бұрын
Wise words regarding the water-worthiness as compared to the phone
@Kwolfx5 жыл бұрын
I think were going to need an epsiode about French pre-Dreadnought design with lots of pictures of different French battleships of La Belle Époque. I've seen some nice colorized photos, and some pictures that look like an old wooden ship of the line was covered in iron and the designer decided to cut out squares in the hull plating where the original gun ports where; because, maybe they thought the original Napoleonic cannons might be of some use. Of course they didn't actually do that, but there were a huge number of square ports on the sides of some French pre-Dreadnoughts and I don't think they were put there for ventilation.
@abrahamlincoln97582 жыл бұрын
I just watched this video, and the dread in his voice was enjoyable.
@FoolOfAToke5 жыл бұрын
Thanks for re-doing all of the old robo videos. One note though: the opening is long. For those of us who play a playlist, put the phone down, and walk away while relying on auto play, have to sit through 30 seconds of silence and gunshots before we get to the good stuff. Just a thought!
@bskorupk5 жыл бұрын
On one hand, as I know the feeling of binge-watching and hearing the same theme repeatedly, on the other hand, I also love the lumbering, powerful feel of it, so I feel it would be a bit like removing/truncating a well made theme song from a show, because marathons exist. Furthermore, although this might just be my sense of time and pettiness being weird, the length of the episodes tends to water down the negative aspect of long opening. I don't think 30 seconds is too long an intro for what is often (rounding normally) a 30 minute run-time "five minute guide" ;)
@Drachinifel5 жыл бұрын
Maybe KZbin needs to hire the man Netflix has in a basement who invented the 'Skip Intro' button?
@FoolOfAToke5 жыл бұрын
@@Drachinifel KZbin upgrading their platform based off user feedback? Pshaw.....
@bskorupk5 жыл бұрын
@@Drachinifel As someone from a long line of engineers/physicists/bookworms/weebs, I doubt that it's merely one "man Netflix has in a basement" as most research and development groups have at least one great room full of what Sam the American Bald Eagle would describe as "..You are All, WEIRDOS!... tch!" who speak with either few words and gesticulation, or lots of precise words and paper, with which they conjure up new ideas and designs, and then mathematically and experimentally refine/define them from there.
@captainobvious92335 жыл бұрын
1:12 I actually love old ships like that!
@derekmcmanus14235 жыл бұрын
Ah the ship that started it all! 😀
@jeb7912 жыл бұрын
Dreadnought is a great name for a battleship it inspires fearsome greatness. Carolina does not invoke that image
@joeclaridy Жыл бұрын
As a native South Carolinian I both agree and resent this post.
@alexhuxley33554 жыл бұрын
"Fear God and Dread Nought" Admiral of the Fleet Lord Fisher
@dichebach5 жыл бұрын
I would love to hear your analysis of when big gun warships should ostensibly be considered to have been made obsolete, even though this wasn't acknowledged for a long time after they probably were obsolete.
@bkjeong43025 жыл бұрын
Diche Bach Probably in the 1930s, when carriers gained actual killing power.
@dichebach5 жыл бұрын
@@bkjeong4302 Sounds about right. I do think a video by Drach on this topic could be epic though. I have not systematically examined the records. But based on what little 'research' I've done, I think that, after WWI Battleships accomplished very little. That generalization is probably very shaky; but it seems to me it deserves to be seriously analyzed!
@bkjeong43025 жыл бұрын
Diche Bach Yeah. As arguably the worst example of military procurement ever, and a huge mistake made by both sides of WWII, it deserves more attention. Even in WWI it was the battlecruisers that were largely responsible for the big capital ship matches.
@dichebach5 жыл бұрын
@@bkjeong4302 Of course, the sub was the king of total tonnage sunk. But in second place, I'm not sure. Maybe the dive bomber? Maybe destroyer torpedo strikes? Not sure. Seems like its the type of topic Drach could really sink his teeth in to. Probably several videos worth!
@bkjeong43025 жыл бұрын
Diche Bach While subs were definitely lethal, they’re most effective as raiders. It’s the fact battleships couldn’t attack a carrier (barring extreme human stupidity a la Glorious) that made them useless.
@catjudo15 жыл бұрын
I have read that the only dreadnought left is the USS Texas. It's an amazing ship, but is rusting away and really needs to be put into a permanent dry dock to preserve her for future generations. The money is there (it's effing Texas and there's a lot of oil money) and she has had a great deal of work done, but still she is corroding into nothing. I've seen her in person and hope that someone or some corporate entity that doesn't mind its logo and assistance flouted publicly would step in and save her. Once she's gone, she's gone and an entire class of important ships with her.
@nathangillispie5114 күн бұрын
How the channel has grown!
@Cloudman5725 жыл бұрын
Love the iphone references!
@dannuttle90054 жыл бұрын
"and the warranty is not voided in the mere presence of water" Captain, we have scored a direct hit amidships and the enemy is sinking and beeping every time they try to plug it in.
@WierdSpookyDude3 жыл бұрын
It was First Admiral of the Fleet, Lord Kilverstone, who said, "Fear God, ... and Dreadnought in 1900, six years before the launching of the famous British battleship by that name.
@AYEcorolla3 жыл бұрын
1:14 you brought that French pre-dreadnaught video on yourself mate lol
@seanbigay104210 ай бұрын
HMS Dreadnought was one of two ships that were such game-changers they gave their name to a whole class of warships. The other was USS Monitor.
@Tuck-Shop5 жыл бұрын
Love the humour
@steventhompson94314 жыл бұрын
A funny side note, an Uncle of mine served in Royal Navy in the 50s and 60s. He told me that ships heads were flushed with sea water and were inline, so many men could be sat on inline thrones at the same time. He told me if you heard a scream jump straight of the loo ! Because somebody upstream has lit fire to a newspaper or oily rag and sent it down the water course sinjing hairs and gospatoodlies as it went underneath every man !!!!! Very good trick
@b.griffin3175 жыл бұрын
1:13 no, no. no no no. NO! NO, NO. NOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!! AWWWHHHH!!!!
@shingshongshamalama5 жыл бұрын
AKA Great Grandma. Rest her soul.
@HEDGE10113 жыл бұрын
“My eyes...they burn...please make it stop.” Never were truer words spoken. And to think that always style-conscious France came up with those things.
@josdelijster45052 жыл бұрын
thank you can binch your conten for hours
@eternalflamesolarflare35225 жыл бұрын
comparing dreadnought to an Iphone... subtle but effective.
@thehandoftheking33143 жыл бұрын
I agree with which one he chose though
@kevinmccarthy87463 жыл бұрын
Wow, fantastic, a French car called the Citron,pardon my spelling, is a land lubery equivilent. So ugly its beautiful. On the forward gun mount there looks to be a man in a Eclezieastic looking white robe, may be a Bishop by certainly not a Cardinal. But we were so interested in getting a cardinal. Please pardon my familiarity.
@baronvonjo19295 жыл бұрын
Will you do videos on ocean liners? Some have interesting war histories and such. Like the Queens, Wilhelm Gustloff, The Battle between the German ocean liner Cap Trafalgar and British ocean liner Carmania, Normandie, HMHS Britannic, Lancastria and Laconia, RMS Olympic's WW1 career. Or the value ocean liners converted into troopships played in the World Wars. I like ocean liners.... lol... just something to keep in mind..
@kkhagerty63155 жыл бұрын
438 likes and no dislikes. Go buddy!
@juanecheyt5 жыл бұрын
I would preffer a dreadnought for my money too LOL!......... You earned a follower sir.
@drrocketman77943 жыл бұрын
I just love the name, Dreadnought.
@peterlaurie59863 жыл бұрын
Admiral King USN. My father, Lt Cdr Alec Laurie was sent to beard King in 1941/2. His assignment was to fit merchant ship bridges with slabs of Plastic Armour (tar and flints like a road surface) to protect the captain and crew from German aircraft in the western approaches. My father had been grabbed by the RN into Naval Intelligence because he had a science degree and a small yacht. He was to have been sent as a Lieutenant but argued that King would be more impressed (yeah!) by a Lieutenant Commander and Laurie would be better paid. He had no problem with King and armoured a lot of ships in the Brooklyn Navy Yard. He carried a rifle around to test the slabs with live fire.on the dockside.
@Nuke893455 жыл бұрын
Speaking of the Dreadnought class Nuclear Ballistic missile Submarine, on this article here, www.forces.net/news/politics/defence-secretary-announces-ps400-million-funding-nuclear-submarines, last week they revealed the name for HMS Dreadnought's sister ship to be HMS Valiant.
@MrHealey965 жыл бұрын
nice vid
@michaeldy31572 жыл бұрын
The first dreadnaught from the 1800s. Is worth a guide. A 1879 ship that has the basic two turret design? Amazing. Why did the UK not build more like that back then?
@leftnoname4 жыл бұрын
The speed and efficiency of British capital ship construction at the turn of the century is simply stunning by today's standards. It is now taking them 10 years of parliamentary debates and 10 more years of actual construction work (from outsourced materials) to build a glorified cutter.
@dovetonsturdee70334 жыл бұрын
And the cost estimated by the clueless MoD usually turns out to be about 10% of what the final cost turns out to be. Following which, the MoD announces that the final design is 'more capable' than had been expected, and that, therefore, only 5, rather than 8, will be built. Presumably, in MoD world, the ideal Royal Navy of the future would have one ship, but a remarkably capable one. It would, however, take 40 years to build, presumably in a South East Asian shipyard.
@anthonyryan9233 жыл бұрын
Dreadnought’s designers seemed to have the right idea about secondary armament. Could you produce a video examining the usefulness of secondary armament on battles? Whilst not an expert in the area I do feel that few battleships used secondary armaments to the extent where their cost,weight etc was justified.
@johncase75643 жыл бұрын
South Carolina and Michigan were on the stocks before Dreadnaught, but Congress held them up for 2 years. I believe this was due to the debate between the 2 viewpoints represented by Sims and Mahan. If this has been covered I cannot find it. If not, it would make for a great video.
@BJTHOMAS19705 жыл бұрын
Would you consider doing a video on the USS Utah? It was sunk at Pearl Harbor. Thank you.
@MrSCOTTtheSCOT5 жыл бұрын
weirdly I just watched this video yesterday (11th Dec), but it was robot voiced.