DJI Mic Mini Vs Hollyland Lark M2S: Best Tiny Mic Yet?

[@BetterCreating]

Hey all - earlier video this week to cover this release of the M2s: So what do you think? Is this the best sounding mini Wireless Microphone yet? Does it really compete with the DJ for features? Watch this next for my full creative desk setup kit on a budget: kzbin.info/www/bejne/iXmwpWqCg9t-ZpI

[@petercofrancesco9812]

I can hear a difference but I think it's mainly due to mic positioning. While M2s is more convenient clipping it to the collar near your throat and under the chin loses the high tones. The DJI has less bass but the mid chest is the best lav position (I actually prefer it). Like you said for paid interview gig it be stressfully relying on either. I really do like the design of the M2s, although the market is getting flooded with these type of wireless mics in all manner of shape, size and features.

[@paulhall111]

I prefer the DJI Mic Mini for its fuller and brighter sound. It's a winner for me.

[@mypawgi]

if your using DJI cameras...i think DJI mini is best option since it can be connected without the receiver

[@BetterCreating]

Yep totally.

[@iq21]

DJI mic 2 and even the new MINI can also be used with INSTA360 Ace series and most of the mobile phone alone as a Bluetooth mic without the receiver. For me, I fond the the clipping mechanism of the M2s.😊

[@Crazypostman]

My opinion is the M2S has a deeper, less "sparkly" audio. More of a flat EQ, to my ear

[@520RevsBowling]

Awesome video very good information, been looking for another mic for when im bowling

[@chris]

One thing you didn't touch on, which is a difference for me, is the M2S doesn't have a flashing LED on it. The M2 and the Mic Mini both have visible flashing lights. I have the M2 and put the black sticker on it to hide the logo but I still wish I could get rid of the flashing LED. I may pick up the M2S as another option. Great review and testing!

[@HiMadeMukbang]

I own lark m2s but tbh doesnt sounds as good as in this video. may I know what audio camera level you use and which level of the mic ?

[@BetterCreating]

Sure - camera right down to -28.5 and mic on middle setting. :)

[@krazek100]

Always you need to lower your camera audio setting at least to -12 db or lower ( better test for different mics)

[@RoryWalker92]

Great review and video! I’m a new subscriber and I’ve been loving your Apple product reviews. I’ve decided to purchase a base M4 Mac Mini based on your review! Keep up the great content!

[@BetterCreating]

Awesome! Thank you! Yeah - I think the M4 Mac Mini is a fantastic deal at the moment. Hope you enjoy it :)

[@fidelsau]

Thank you for the info. Do you know what’s the latency on the Lark M2S? Thank you.

[@itsr7studio]

Fantastic review, Simon! I’ve been looking for something that is compact and has decent sound for Zoom work calls. The AirPods Pro have such a frustratingly tinny sound that I don’t wish upon others! I love my Rode mics, but they take up space on my desk for day-to-day (keeping them for when I need to record online tutorials or have a big presentation). Thanks to your thorough review, I ordered the M2S! I’m surprised by the quality of the audio (even without noise cancellation) in my untreated home office, the compact form, and ease of use.

[@BetterCreating]

Awesome - totally agree - these are perfect for quality calls easily - and fair for the money :)

[@Storrien]

I like m2s system. Can you put 3.5 jack cable in charging case instead of usb-c receiver?

[@BetterCreating]

oooh, interesting - maybe it would fit in that gap...

[@Digital-j8l]

On your opinion, if I only use de mic for my phone and recording on my PC I won't need to buy de receiver for a professional camera, because I don't use a professional camera?

[@snapsbyreyes]

The M2S sounds best for his voice. Gotta love how discreet it is for button-down shirts/blouses. I already own the Mic Mini but will get the M2S based on how discreet it would be depending on what my subject is wearing during an interview. Different situations call for different tools!

[@BetterCreating]

Totally - TBF - it’s easy for me to use both since I only paid for the DJI - but I do thing the M2s is a great option if your mix is mostly used for calls or talking to a camera. :)

[@RackyBashOne]

Hi Simon, thanks for all your great videos, they're always very informative and on point. I've got a question... I will be buying the Osmo pocket 3 and I'm looking to use 3-4 wireless mics at once but i'm struggling to find a simple solution...... any suggestions?

[@RedWolfe]

I did find myself liking the “DGEEI” sound quality better while listening to you on my Sony WH-1000XM5 headphones. It sounded fuller overall to me with less of that subtle high end whine that can created by noise cancellation. I ended up going with the Mic Mini and I like how I can leave the USB-C adapter connected to the transmitter and it still fits nicely into the case making it easy to just remove from the case and it’s ready to plug into my 15 Pro Max. The larger size of the transmitter on the Mic Mini vs the Hollyland can be an issue. The tight clearance when I used it with my Osmo 6 did cause me concern. Thanks for the comparison.

[@BetterCreating]

Haha - yes - can’t help myself on that one! Ha. Totally agree here on the ability to leave the usb-c attached. It’s fine on the phone but I worry I could knock it and break it. :)

[@djxcel23]

How do you use the usb-c to lighting cable that is included?

[@BetterCreating]

Yes - it just plugs into the receiver as an option for lighting version - so. It so great as far as I can tell - I would go for the M2 if you want lighting direct to a phone.

[@xaviermagana2955]

It's kinda contradictory, but a fix for the deadcats is to shave/cut the hairs just a little bit. I did that with my Lark M1 and Lark Max and i reduced them quite significantly without loosing the windscreens capacity to control excess noise

[@BetterCreating]

nice idea! Haircut time?

[@m1kel]

i reckon the usbc phone receiver does not need to be charged like the m2 (orig)

[@BetterCreating]

That’s right - it take power from the device.

[@evareikilive]

Maybe you know, if it will be in white color, coz i never wear black clothes…( would buy white ones immediately!!!

[@BetterCreating]

Nice idea - I think they may do it at somepoint!

[@RichardWilson397]

Both great products, I prefer the DJI's build quality.

[@BetterCreating]

Same here - just - on build quality and all-in-one portability - it's just so much better all in the case - but I would say I love the M2s for video calls via the USB-C reciever - I think it's best for that use case.

[@AlexRyan_]

The lark noise canceling is much more noticeable but seems more flat IMO

[@BetterCreating]

Yes - a little - bit changing it to low is better - I had the DJI on low which is much better

[@sneeks]

Are any of these microphones suitable for capturing ambient audio while on the move? I occasionally use a phone mounted on a gimbal and follow alongside pipe bands and brass bands, will these capture the audio from these ok? The iPhone microphone struggles with wind noise and clipping while walking alongside the bands.

[@JWNRW59]

@@sneeks As the Hollyland is Omni-directional, I would expect it to be able to pick up some ambient noise.

[@andyz_w3584]

Greata honestly Comparision, thank you Bro. M2s looks sounds better. could you do some 32bit microphones?

[@BetterCreating]

Thanks my friend - yes - if I can get some I will do! I think the Rode Wireless Pro is the choice for 32 bit float at moment

[@Fredo.heavyy]

We don’t need more wireless mics without internal recording & 32bit float 🗣

[@BetterCreating]

I do agree - I'd like to see these companies release a Pro version with those features!

[@Frank5Gmedia]

Well said bro

[@orvet]

I’d humbly say it depends on the use case. For video calls 32-bit float etc is not needed. Ease of use however is key. IMHO it’s good to have different gear for different occasions/needs. Yes it’s more expensive to buy two bits of gear but the single perfect product doesn’t exist 😜

[@Fredo.heavyy]

@ Except the OG Hollyland lark M2 was released a year ago. This "new" model has same old specs and no innovation. It's a text book cash grab product + we already have exact clones of these mics for Mobile user from many other brands.

[@orvet]

@@Fredo.heavyy The design is the innovation and USP: visible size, lack of logo. And the sound quality is IMHO very good. Not every bit of a product needs to be entirely new for a product to be worth releasing. Cash grab, I respectfully disagree. That particular light can be shone with more certainty on other brands.

[@MoncefVortex]

They were all sounding great until you used the MKH50 which destroyed them 😆

[@BetterCreating]

Haha - Sorry! Yes - but it’s 7x the cost + the rod-caster: nice thou :)

[@MoncefVortex]

@@BetterCreating yes, it's much more expensive, and they have different purposes. Thank you very much for the great video!

[@tenzinseeds6878]

Bon3 to pick 😂😂😂

[@wirafajarsejahtera9153]

who win?

[@BetterCreating]

I think I like the M2s best for sound quality and the DJI for everyday carry and use with filming. :)

[@psoon04286]

I have used Hollyland products, they are pretty good but at this time any new mini mics coming into the market have to be divided into ‘no internal recording’ or ‘ able to do internal recording’. Most other features are nearly identical

[@BetterCreating]

Yes interesting - internal recording - we need it on these! I think the sound is better on these new Hollyland M2s than the old version thou…

[@AJTrucker]

It’s DJI, not DGI

[@BetterCreating]

Yeah totally - I just can’t get myself to say it! Haha

[@Crazypostman]

If I'm not actively thinking about it and trying to enunciate, it sounds like I say DGI also

[@CAMTechChris]

No shit! You really think he didn't know it's DJI not DGI??

[@BetterCreating]

@ haha. I think there was a cycle brand called DGI when I was younger who made pedals or something... it's baked in!

[@musicforever5194]

Nice review! Is it possible to measure the audio latency of these mics? How many ms have through 3.5mm output? Thank you very much!

[@teamkaskas]

The lark M2 sounds better than the mini and m2s

[@BetterCreating]

Interesting - yes they are well loved - I notice it’s a mix of preferences across these three - so all all are very good - just comes down to taste perhaps :)

[@reedeema]

Man i just love Hollyland .. Ever since the M1s ...

[@BetterCreating]

These are very good with a low noise floor :)

[@JWNRW59]

The Fulaim X5M is another compelling option as well. It’s not a mini mic, but is very very good all around. These mini mics are interesting, but are we pushing smaller size just for the sake of smaller size?? The M2S is pretty competitive and clearly price point will be lower than the DJI. Don’t think you can go wrong to be honest with either.

[@BetterCreating]

I actually think the size hasn’t changed - just what is shown - the mic feels better on quality and quiet noise floor too - much improved IMO over M2 :)

[@mex5341]

yes, Fulaim is good! but the size ...

[@JWNRW59]

@@mex5341 Funny that the size of the Fulaim mic was sufficient before the DJI mini. The allure of the smaller form factor really is compelling, I must say. When my Fulaim X5 dies, I’ll likely go for one of the mini mics.

[@mex5341]

@@JWNRW59 i have x5 but i need smth smaller like this m2s.

[@JWNRW59]

@@mex5341 Makes sense - if you need the smaller form factor. The X5 is a couple of years old at least now but admit it’s getting a bit long in the tooth for me as I use it every day in remote meetings between 4-6 hours 3 to 4 days a week. It’s been a trooper but happy to see these newer smaller form factors coming into play.

[@tiemji]

Thanks for this review. Those M2s looks really great especially the design not too much visible compared to other. Thanks for sharing

[@BetterCreating]

No problem!

[@agambhasin]

I think I prefer the M2S and I am gonna get it, I have the Dji Mic Mini and the Dji Mic 2, but I think The M2S has a slight edge over both of those

[@BetterCreating]

The sound is better I think. I do find though that the all in one case for the DJI means I lean towards that for on the go video work with a mirrorless camera.

[@agambhasin]

@ Sure, everyone has their own use case, but as an audio enthusiast and mic collector I choose the one that sounds better to me and works for my voice, I am yet to get the M2S bcz its still not available here in India, and I feel its gonna be a good addition to my collection. I feel the wireless mics especially the budget ones are still evolving and this year we can see a lot of innovation in this area, I am hoping for the best Good Wishes

[@rickicoughlan]

I picked up the Lark M2S and will be testing it over the coming weekend.

[@BetterCreating]

Hope you enjoy it - it's a real close call on the DJI - I think i prefer the DJI for mirrorless video work on the go, the M2s for video calls and use with a Mobile.

[@pilea.agency]

I absolutely LOVE your videos Simon. Thanks for having them all and for this real comparaison. I'll buy the M2S

[@BetterCreating]

Thanks so much! Great to read and thanks for being part of the community. Hope you enjoy them!

[@Tha-Kelly]

I purchased the Hollyland M2S Lark Mobile Version for type C and I will test it this weekend :-). Thank you

[@BetterCreating]

Hope you enjoy it! It's great for mobile use - I think I like the DJi for more serious video work on a Mirrorless cam