Nothing specifically Chinese here. This type of turnouts has been used at least in Japan and in Europe for decades. It's perfectly normal that by now, one can find them in China too, as the country has built a substantial high speed network. I don't know if Chinese turns are different in any significant way. Btw, the train down is Japanese...
@shashanksrivastava558 күн бұрын
Well said buddy...........
@BrakeCoach4 күн бұрын
I think this is an indian channel, we arent the target audience. Hence the india vs china comparison
@karlbrodowsky774413 күн бұрын
In Europe Switches for highspeed similar to this have been in uses for at l3ast 50 years.
@uncipaws764312 күн бұрын
In Germany less than 40 years (first used on late-1980s high speed lines), have they been used in France before that?
@karlbrodowsky774412 күн бұрын
@uncipaws7643 I assume that they have been used on lines with 200 km/h, which existed long before the TGV and the Shinkansen, at least since the mid 1970s. I know for sure in Germany, but I assume in France, Japan, Italy and UK as well.
@pmaitrasm12 күн бұрын
True.
@Pitoumotorsport12 күн бұрын
Evidemment, il a été mis au point pour la premier ligne TGV sud est en France...
@N1originalgazza11 күн бұрын
@@Pitoumotorsport "evidemment"? 🤣🤣🤣🤣The French....the whole world laughs at your convinced and unjustified chauvinism!
@chrisgeorgiou868012 күн бұрын
The animation at 2:12 looks wrong imo, the switch (right pic) will guide the train to the right track (mainline), while the swing nose turnout (left pic) would cause the train to diverge to the left (branch) - actually the left wheel will hit the nose with the inner side of the flange, derailing the train. It rather causes confusion. Also the pic remains visible for only a couple of seconds, and viewers don't have enough time to examine it - I had to stop it several times exactly at 2:12 to view it carefully. Pls consider fixing the above two little issues.
@mathiasroehn93998 күн бұрын
That is exactly my observation. Both animations together cause the train to derail.
@alandaters85478 күн бұрын
You beat me to it! It should be easy to correct the video.
@Bassotronics3 күн бұрын
This channel is dumb anyway, I don't expect anything with sense.
@hvnterblack11 күн бұрын
Normal high speed junction in Europe.
@APiesc12 күн бұрын
Weichen mit beweglichem Herzstück werden schon seit sehr langer Zeit verbaut. Vor allem auf Strecken, auf denen höhere Geschwindigkeiten gefahren werden.
@mapf709712 күн бұрын
Soweit ich weiß, hat bereits die Deutsche Reichsbahn Gesellschaft in den dreiziger Jahren Kreuzungen mit beweglichen Herzstücken für besonders flache Kreuzungen eingeführt. Das heißt für Kreuzungen an Abzweigstellen, die in beiden Richtungen mit mindestens 100 km/h befahren wurden. Die dazugehörigen Weichen hatten allerdings noch keine beweglichen Herzstücke.
@pmaitrasm12 күн бұрын
SNCF has been doing this for decades.
@ainonainpg3d7998 күн бұрын
DB also
@mathiasroehn93998 күн бұрын
2:12 Left animation guides the train onto the left track. The right animation directs the train onto the right track. The result would be a heavy, if not catastrophic derailment, depending on the speed.
@philoso37711 сағат бұрын
Do we have asynchronies switching on page 2:11 ?
@JuergenW.8 күн бұрын
The technology was developed in the 1950s and 1960s with the emergence of high-speed trains. In particular, countries like Germany, France, and Japan, which heavily invested in high-speed rail systems, standardized the use of movable frog crossings. High-speed rail lines (from the 1980s onwards): With the expansion of high-speed rail lines, such as for the ICE or TGV, movable frog crossings became essential, as they are a prerequisite for speeds exceeding 200 km/h.
@satyamdas895514 күн бұрын
Good information 👌🏼
@imkerhoogenhout67112 күн бұрын
Very interesting!
@GSM-SM12 күн бұрын
A fantastic animation. Superb technical explanation. Keep it up.
@snagletoothscott37299 күн бұрын
US only has a very niche use of this type of switch, but we call it a frog not a swing nose. It has very little application so far, except on places like the North East Corridor where 100+ mph speeds are common
@markuslaun709511 күн бұрын
That's a special Chinese copy from existing systems....
@Grid5611 күн бұрын
Everything Chinese is a copy of someone else's work 😂😂😂😂😂😂
@aliuyar636513 күн бұрын
Great idea, smart application
@LetsGrowUp13 күн бұрын
What do you think about it? Share with us
@ronaldbenitez632213 күн бұрын
You should apply for an HB1 visa in the EE.UU.
@sumantsingh491812 күн бұрын
How much change in its OHE.
@RisaAnggraini141012 күн бұрын
My country still use normal crossing but train can still pass it at 120kmph
@aadiadam11 күн бұрын
120 is not a high speed !
@luckykumar53349 күн бұрын
Only on main line not while going to loop line
@piyushrvyas11 күн бұрын
Thanks for sharing this tutorial It was a good Learning
@ronparrish666610 күн бұрын
We got them in Canada also
@achimzortea581410 күн бұрын
This is a standard switch with moving center - nothing special in german such a switch is called "Schnellfahrweiche"
@rationalthinkerkerala613813 күн бұрын
Great idea..
@elsap756 күн бұрын
Is not a Chinese invention but copied from older European technology.
@Midori-Clover7 күн бұрын
The movable nose crossing was widely adopted in Japan when the “Tokaido-Shinkansen” began commercial operation at 210km/h in 1964. 🚅💨💨 It seems that high-speed railways in every country now use it.🌏😌🍀
@paul-andrelarose33895 күн бұрын
It is false to say that the reduced speed through the diverging track of a turn-out is a consequence of the gap in the railway frog. Rather, it is because of the curvature of the track along the diverging route. For this reason, the permissible speed in a diverging route in a North-American turnout is higher in a #20 turnout than in a #7 turnout. However, the permissible speed in the non-diverging direction is the same in both cases and it is that of the adjacent track territory. The very same speed restrictions apply in the case of moveable point turnouts, i.e. in both fixed point and moveable point turnouts, the permissible speed along the non-diverging route is unrestricted. 2025/01/20. Ontario, Canada.
@mdshahnawajakhtar158811 күн бұрын
very useful information..
@Hoeishetmogelijk11 күн бұрын
Were are the yellow parts for?
@derradfahrer50299 күн бұрын
In case of derailment, it guides the wheel past the "wrong" tongue. Otherwise the derailed wheel might catch on the regular moving part of the switch (tongue, gray) near the heart and push the train away from the rails. For Example if the train goes from left to right at 2:25.
@x-gamessimulator106713 күн бұрын
Amazing
@JASON_COSandTRAINS10 күн бұрын
normal in High speed rail systems around the world
@jamesbayer361012 күн бұрын
Un aiguillage a toujours au moins 2 lames pivotantes + dans le cas d’une LGV une pointe de cœur mobile.Cette technique est peut être d’origine Japonnaise, ayant été les premiers à exploiter des TGV. Suivie par la France, l’Italie, la Corée, l’Allemagne, l’Espagne et seulement ensuite la Chine. Qui a construit ses TGV sur la technique du Zefiro (ICE Allemand)
@cabinetdecuriositestechniq30594 күн бұрын
Bonjour, vous semblez bien connaître le système. Pouvez-vous me dire comment se plie la pointe de coeur ? A l'image, elle se déforme à gauche ou à droite, mais en réalité, c'est du fer rigide qui ne se plie pas du tout. Est-elle articulée ? La vidéo ne montre pas une pointe de coeur réelle. Peut-on la voir fonctionner quelque part ? Merci de vos précisions.
@rikardlalic72758 күн бұрын
Great
@abhi600013 күн бұрын
I have plan inter City traveling with unique way of pod system if you want we discuss. You make d3 video and use for KZbin
@GaneshKumar21m13 күн бұрын
What's with the Guy showing up in the Left bottom corner.?! 😂😂
@cziffrathegreat66613 күн бұрын
Bro that's the guy who makes these videos He's using an AI voice over
@bonguyen707813 күн бұрын
You can do SAB braking system, empty pistol
@Jirka79067 күн бұрын
It works like any other...
@Sdrshn_0712 күн бұрын
It's a very nice structure & design ❤🎉😊 Love from India
@OMPRAKASH-kl5pk11 күн бұрын
जर्मनी यूज करता था बाद में चाइना में आया है
@TainoHans11 күн бұрын
Chinese??? They are used for decades in the Netherlands.
@wbjl20007 күн бұрын
also used in Germany by light Railways (Tram) since the nineteen seventies...;_)
@Nishi-ki1zz13 күн бұрын
Modiji have invented this long back , but anti nationals M are not allowing it to be implemented in india
@ಭಾರತೀಯ_ನಾಗರಿಕ12 күн бұрын
What? 😮
@franky83978 күн бұрын
Where is the new thing? wait. that doesn't exist. It's something that has been used for decades everywhere 🤣🤣
@shafiqsams609412 күн бұрын
the Malaysia, lrt train kelana jaya Line crossing treck
@wernerschulte62459 күн бұрын
It is difficulte for nonenglish-speaker to follow the explanation with the "music" in the background.
@Bassotronics3 күн бұрын
This channels name is ridiculous. And why is there a guy on the left bottom corner while an A.I. is speaking. Senseless!
@jamesburnside302311 күн бұрын
Very cool probably more money to use or install hence not much use here
@rafaelfernandez83119 күн бұрын
Buen vídeo.
@attilatasciko481712 күн бұрын
THANKS , BUT WHO CREATED THIS , FIRST ‽ GERMAN ‽
@denshad10 күн бұрын
I think it's japan with Shinkansen in 1964
@gopalmajumdar87455 сағат бұрын
Hi This is Ranaghat 5 No platform 😂😂😂
@shashanksrivastava558 күн бұрын
Free Tibet.....
@BR40311 күн бұрын
In Indien sollten zuerst mehr Züge eingesetzt werden. Jeder kennt die Bilder von überfüllten Zügen aus Indien. Die Leute sitzen sogar auf dem Dach. Er wäre viel wichtiger dieses Problem zu lösen. Die Kapazität muss erstmal erhöht werden. Danach kann man die Weichen umbauen.
@rockysandycool10 күн бұрын
Bangladesh Railways are not Indian Railway. People can't sit on roof of train in India.
@dh00mketu11 күн бұрын
There is no difference except the v nose also moves
@kalpeshwani852013 күн бұрын
New one.... If direction is one way fix, spring switch at both switch and crossing will do fine.
@UJWALKUMARI-d5v13 күн бұрын
Hello, I am from India
@peterectasy295710 күн бұрын
two separate systems which must be perfectly synchronized. make higher possibility to fail