How Do We Know The Bible Has Not Been Changed?

[@FaithandActiondotnet]

Funny, they want to use Scripture to discredit Scripture. :)

[@alexpukay]

Christian Repenter lol right. If the bible is unreliable then how can they rely on the verse in the bible that says that it's been changed. How can they prove that verse from the bible is reliable and therefore the bible was in fact changed. But if the bible is reliable and that verse is taken for a fact then it's not the bible that was changed but some other books that deviate from the bible

[@FaithandActiondotnet]

It's absurd!

[@FaithandActiondotnet]

+John Grytbakk The devil has many apologists.

[@garymorton1723]

@@FaithandActiondotnet What's even more absurd is trying to use the bible to prove the bible.

[@neitiz7051]

Islam is false they teach only war

[@BetHobbs]

Praise God!!!! He is keeping His Word intact.

[@EmergencyL0tion]

I’m Christian my whole life and I have many questions still. I don’t go off what the Bible says cause there’s just to many statements that make me question if it’s even right and then I just go off my gut feeling on what I feel is right

[@nmstacks3735]

That’s foolish what you feel is right or wrong comes from the heart and Jesus said your heart is evil without him so get back to reading the bible brother

[@EmergencyL0tion]

@@nmstacks3735 so you shouldn’t question anything just pretend it’s not altered because that’s what happened with king Henry, if you even questioned it back then you executed even though it was wrong and altered

[@nmstacks3735]

@@EmergencyL0tion no of course you should question things the bible teaches to gain knowledge and if we ask God he will lead us to the truth ik just saying there many arguments why you shouldn’t trust the bible but the bible was written so we may not be confused yes I know if we did we would’ve have been killed but think about if we was trying to get closer to God and in the process we was executed God will not forsake us nether will he let us die in misery but set place in heaven for us for building a relationship with him. I understand that your wary of the bible who isn’t but to say your a Christian without believing in the bible is foolishness and I will not sugercoat this to make you feel better. God bless your brother

[@soon8622]

Proverbs 3:5-6 + Isaiah 55:9 | My friend it does not matter what you think is right. The human mind is deceptive we are SINFUL human beings. Our ways are not His ways, His ways are HIGHER. Heavens higher than the earth. Who are we to question Gods ways when He is all perfect and righteous. The word of God is the WORD of GOD. We are to trust in the Lord and lean not on our understanding.

[@soon8622]

@@nmstacks3735 never question the word of God.

[@Sameoldfitup]

"Death must be so beautiful. To lie in the soft brown earth, with the grasses waving above one's head, and listen to silence. To have no yesterday, and no tomorrow. To forget time, to forgive life, to be at peace." Oscar Wilde.

[@thucydides7849]

Sameoldfitup beautiful

[@devonschmitz4113]

Death is beautiful for some and terrible for many, because it's appointed for man to die once and then the judgement. Non believers can't see how our actions in this life carry over because they believe this is the end all be all which in itself is having faith in something! Turn to God Jesus Christ loves you! God bless you.

[@gracewright8038]

I think that is idiotic as well as illogical. There is no living consciousness in the grave.

[@lasacat19]

I think that the Bible has something like a 99.5% accuracy rate, right? The other .5% can just be accounted for with, like, the footnotes and whatnot. Pretty sure that the Bible has not been changed over time.

[@jasonkerrigan5879]

TY for addressing the issues of our day. I'd like to see more of this. The status quo is not helping, and brother it is in you, in Christ, to break down the status quo

[@sebastianclinciu5445]

Hello Dr. Brown! Can you please make a video on the Documentary Hypothesis (JEDP theory) ? I would love to hear your thoughts on that and if you disagree with it.. give us some arguments to fight this theory. God bless you ! Shalom in Christ Jesus !

[@Romanos1017-fe]

Did you find any answers about it¿

[@fuzzywuzzy1355]

It is totally ludicrous to think the bible hasnt been changed. What do you think the King James version is?

[@gabrielthomas5123]

A translation, not different version

[@solomon.powell]

@@gabrielthomas5123 yes. Exactly. Translations/versions just mean it is in a different language. This is done with most major books in the world, like Les Miserables, Harry Potter, The Chronicles of Narnia. It doesn't mean we no longer can have confidence about the original messages. Hope that helps. Episode 2 here might be of help. I have a degree in this field. kzbin.info/aero/PLIyf0BtuwM2ik_-UhUyfrKbMim9PkTZ1U

[@christianhawk592]

Solomon Powell wring there’s bible versions with more book. Apocrypha orthodox even Greek and other languages have more books and and some have over 80

[@jamiewilkinson2323]

@@solomon.powell This is an interesting point, and does show that the bible cannot be literally interpreted as so many people attempt to do. Because it is translated. However, I wonder how proof of stories such as that in the book of John where he tells the mob "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone..." that was added hundreds of years after the Bible was written (and it was written hundreds of years after the events of the Bible took place in Greek [we think] instead of the Aramaic that would have been spoken at the time which is already an imperfect translation). It is thought that this was an orally passed down story before it was included into manuscripts of the Bible, and is this not implicit evidence that the Bible has been changed? Whether this oral story is true or not - the Bible of today (and even the ancient manuscripts) are not the Bible that was intended. It cannot be literally interpreted and we cannot implicitly trust that what the Bible says is what actually happened. I just find it strange that the Bible could even be close to the truth at all when there are no longer direct translations for these ancient languages - so much meaning is lost or added.

[@noahpike6163]

You know nothing about Christianity i can tell... the different translations are there to help people better understand the bible because everyone’s brain is different. But they all have the same message.

[@joshnieboer3947]

If the Bible has never changed there would not be different interpretations I.E different sects across the planet. I could give you at least one hundred examples when the Bible has been altered due to the translation process, key words replaced to fit our understanding from Hebrew and whole phrases being altered across the entire Bible, their not even hiding this either.. if humanity has a hard enough time interpreting the meaning of words amongst each other already, " Alot of people argue over what the term bare arms means", and that was written less than 300 years ago... Then changing entire words and phrases to fit time's and different cultures and languages across the world, it would be absurd to think there hasn't been changes. YOU CAN NOT SAY "AND SO THE DOG LAID ON THE ROAD" IN RUSSIAN ITS DIFFERNT. They do not have words like, the, and, so, and if two people in russia have a sentence that gets that message across for them, it will look different sound differnt even have differnt lengths after translation. And then even with that message the two people from russia might have a slightly differnt interpretation of that..... and they will teach their children the way they saw and Interpreted the message, and then the natural order is to have differnt religious groups all around the world all claiming the truth but telling a slightly differnt story from the same " original" source. And that's what's we have and see today. Now I try to be a non bisi person that's my I'm here. I'm here anit I, but when ever I come to watch a something like this and you just GLOSS over all the facts and say words like certainty... with everything I know it just shows me that all you are doing is trying to lead sheep with quick 5 mins vids, saying everything's good we checked it ............WITH CERTAINTY........... But we both know whole books and chapters have been removed, most people have never even herd of this I would have expected you to go much more in depth to explain all of these things that I know that are making me question it all in the first place... not just say ITS ALL GOOD.. WITH CERTAINTY... Makes me only distrust this more. Three words, council of nicea. Explain that to me? That is literally a documented, recored event of the changing radically of the Bible.. between two arguing groups who turly felt they had the right interpretation. But only one is right today tho and whoever's disagrees burns in hell forever...... but those were all just mortal humans who decided that, that was right........ if I was to become an admin on wiki right now and changed somthing it doenst mean I was right or in fact even knew what I was doing at all, just means I had the power to change somthing that a lot of people take for fact just like the Bible. How about the changings that took place just back 70 years ago after the Dead Sea scrolls discovery... and all of these changes were made, decided upon and Interpreted by mortal men again... If the actual question was that "has the Bible ever changed" I feel terrible for all of the people who just watched this and then though things were cool and that your telling them the truth the full truth and nothing but the truth.. Sucide its self, the most terrible sin to ever commit wasnt always a sin until around the 1200's when groups of Christian's were literally jumping off cliffs by the thousands to be with god sooner, the Pope literally had to declare it a sin just to stop people when a year before that it was totally fine what ever u want to see god go for it but now everyone is told that it's a mortal sin and you will burn for it because dead people cant give the church money. In 1690's most sects across the world ruled that even attempted suicide is a mortal sin so in the 1680's you wouldnt have gone to hell...... Where is the book of Enoch........ There are literally hundreds of books verses and chapters not in today's mass printed Bible, that 2,000 years ago it was very clear that people considered them to be apart of the Holy Bible.. took almost 700 hundred years for the book of revelations to be universally accepted across the world..... NOW IT THE TRUTH AND THE LAW............ I mean I know Shakespeare was a cool dude but are you really trying to tell me that just because this dude wrote a play bout a girl n boy who loved eachother that it's alright for him to have written the king James bible, that now almost a billion people take as their truth, their fact, their code to live by, THE WORD OF GOD its SELF........... that guy died almost 600 years ago quite a mortal human huh, he prolly farted took fat shits and picked his nose..... so if I write enough plays that do really well I can write a bible book and a billion people will consider it THE LAW, got it....... just reread this, one of the main Bibles in the world today that's followed by almost a billion people... was written by a play/screen/script writer.... 2008 the Vatican, which is just an extension of christianity which is just an extension of Judaism which is just an extension of ancit Egyptian beilfes,which is probably just an extension of some earlier from of religion (probably sumerian) suddenly CHANGED their position they've held for almost a thousand years, that aliens exist, and that this FACT does not interfere with GOD..... makes me laugh that a organization or group can claim so intense and so vigorously and for so long that they are right and this is how your supposed to live and act and this is what you can and can not do and this is what you believe and what you dont believe or your going to burn for all of eternity when you die... and if we feel like it we will burn you at the stake now, but hey check back every so often cause sometimes we CHANGE our minds bout stuff..... this kind of thinking puts people into a box where their saying we know everything live like this or else then 100 years goes by and common knowledge changes and it makes these groups and organizations look like fools when they have to change.. we've known this the whole time and have been killing people who dont agree for 1000 years but now we think were wrong and gonna change some stuff sorry all you dead people we burned better late than never tho right..... Why would any of these groups ever change.... unless the books and bibles and scriptures have changed????? And why so much change just in the last 350 years, has god been down here in that time writing down new shit???........ No mortal people (who dont know shit more than you do) decide what to teach and what should be spread and when to say fuck it we gotta change a little bit, were falling out with the times.... Now this picking and choosing and even slightly altering of translations to fit the needs at the time and saying well this book is ok but these 2 no, and the next one sure pass.... and o we'd better start taking steps to changing our stance on some of these things we've held close to law for almost 1,000 years, or we wont make it through the 21st centry Is the end of the original question of this video.. just wish someone like your self would let people even know about even a fraction of all of this and then present the reasoning why it's still correct.. if you even could... JESUS HIMSELF SAID... YOU WILL ALL TRY TO FIGURE OUT THE DOCTRINE AMONGST YOURSELFS BUT THESE WILL ALL BE JUST THE WORKINGS OF MORTAL MEN .... WTF I am not a scholar or a theologian these are my opinions and interpretation of the things I have heard seen and learned over the course of my time one this rock, including this super truthful and fully thought and flushed out video Thank You.

[@DOASalesman]

I hear there are at least 26 different versions of the quran. Acts17Apologetics (David Wood's chanel) covered this while at speaker's corner.

[@frixyshorts]

Umm no? There is only one ?

[@noufalabbasi8488]

can you prove there is 26 different versions. because everywhere i go there is only the one and only version

[@frixyshorts]

@@noufalabbasi8488 i agree there is only one.

[@tuqaibrahim9039]

Please, refer to links of the other 26 versions you "heard" about.

[@solomon.powell]

For the Bible, there are over 4,000 translations of the original into different languages in the world. I think the Quran has been translated into about 200 languages, but I am not positive. It definitely has some English translations, but not as much as the Bible. So yes, all holy books have different "versions" or "translations"-- but we all agree that the original messages in the original languages are the most important. For the Quran, that means the Arabic text, which was passed down orally initially. For the Bible, that means the 66 documents written in Hebrew and Greek. The original messages are what matter. Just because it has been translated and has different versions does not mean that the original messages should not be trusted. That is somebody trying to trick people. And we can be pretty confident about the original messages of both the Quran and the Bible. It is easy to spot the forgeries and corruptions. In fact, they are clearly listed and marked in most Bibles. People will always try to corrupt holy books. It doesn't mean that they are successful. There is a strong basis for confidence in the original messages of the Bible. Very very strong. Do not let the attempted corruptions cause you doubt. That is what they were made to do. But don't let them! Study. You will see that it is very very clear to find what verses are corruptions. They are even clearly marked in most English translations so it is very easy to tell! All you have to do is research. Episode 2 on this channel has some help for people who are new to the issue. I offer it with love. kzbin.info/aero/PLIyf0BtuwM2ik_-UhUyfrKbMim9PkTZ1U

[@tavishmchotty7927]

Anyone can make any claim they want to since there is no know original autographs of the New Testament.

[@tavishmchotty7927]

Like I said, no original autographs which leaves copies of copies problems. No one can prove their god exists and no one can prove Jesus existed or rose from death.

[@tavishmchotty7927]

Riiiiiight. The Bible is true because it says it is true. That is not proof by ANY measure. No Lion I did not say it was fake, I said no one has ever offered proof of any god. There is a difference.

[@tavishmchotty7927]

No the Bible is not proved by history. The Bible tells stories about the ancient times they are written in. As far as the NT is concerned, we have thousands of copies of copies of parts of copies written after the events occurred (with exception of Book of Revelation and a few other apocalyptic passages in the Gospels and Epistles ). Yes I have read and compared different versions of the Bible. Why would I bother talking about something I have not taken the time to study. Like for example when you line the Gospels up side by side and look at them, they do not line up with each other. The power of the Bible comes from it's malleability. That still does not answer my question that there are NO original autographs of the New Testament so you can't make the claim there have been no changes. No one to this day can prove their god exists. Lion, you are more than free to believe in it because you just want it to be true but please do not try to pass that off as proof.

[@MichaelAChristian1]

Read Genesis chapter 40! Now tell me who wrote it! Jesus Christ is the Son of God! Get a king james bible and believe. Read Matthew. Read Psalms chapter 12!

[@solomon.powell]

@@tavishmchotty7927 Tacitus and others who didn't believe the resurrection accounts still acknowledged Jesus as a real person in history who was executed under Pilate. (drive.google.com/open?id=1oQy8ckKU-aEwLBT1cb0hVGOXgg6wtrGu) In other words, not even Jesus' first and second century opponents tried to argue that he didn't exist. If his opponents believed he existed, you probably should. That doesn't mean you should just believe anything his followers wrote just because they wrote it. But yes we have at least four eye-witnesses claiming they saw him alive again (Matthew, John, Peter, and Paul). All four of them did this at a time when Christianity was illegal and they could be arrested for spreading these things. Two of the four (Peter and Paul) were indeed arrested and executed eventually for not changing their stories. The others suffered deeply. John's brother James was executed. John was put sent to an island for exiled criminals in his old age. No cushy retirement years in Florida for him. He was out there on the island when all the other disciples were dead and he was the last one left. And he was absolutely unwavering. That's when he wrote Revelation but he also wrote the gospel of John in his old age as well. He was unwavering. "We saw him." We just plain saw him. We touched him. He was alive. Now, if you're going to reject that, do it, but if you want to be reasonable you can't reject it just for the fun of it. What motive could they have? To be ostracised from their ethnic group as a whole and their religion (Judaism), to be ostracised from the wider Greco-Roman world (because they refused to worship the state gods and stood out like a sore thumb for it), to be arrested repeatedly, beaten, and sometimes executed. I mean, Joseph Smith showed some motive for political gain (ran for Mayor, and was going to run for President when he was killed), and for sexual gain (he took about 40 wives total in the years after he gained fame from his claims); Muhammad gained fame and power from his claims, raised an army and defeated his enemies, and took a new additional wife each of his last 10 years of life. Dying with around ten wives. What did the apostles gain? They were killed off one by one. Their siblings and family sometimes too. They were poor. As a matter of fact, their claims explain the existence of the other religions, because they said point-blank that Jesus said false religions would come, and they even warned about fake "angels" giving "new messages" to people and leading them away from what Jesus taught. Honestly, it doesn't seem all that hard to see who was most likely telling the truth.

[@childofjesuschrist4515]

What was the first language the Bible written in?

[@thucydides7849]

Auviehauncia Neal it was written in a now dead language that was spoken in the middle eastern area. It then turns up in Greek and Hebrew.

[@syedalimohsinmoosavi9664]

He admitted himself, the Bible has many manuscripts in different languages and translations, which over the time changes the meaning of The Word.

[@syedalimohsinmoosavi9664]

@Denmark no, you're right about Torah, but Quran doesn't have many diiferent versions or authors. There are translations though, which do not communicate the beauty of each verse like how it should be said. Plus, it was revealed in arabic because it is one of the most widely spoken language unlike Hebrew or Latin. And thats the reason why contradictions cant be made in The Quran.

[@syedalimohsinmoosavi9664]

@Denmark there are many contradictions in the other books. Many things were fabricated too. Looking at it from the religious view is that people of Jesus (Prophet Isa (as)), were told that there would be a last Prophet after Jesus too. Who would bring forth the final word of God (Quran). The proof of Quran being the true and Last book is that there are no cantradictions in it. There are no fabrications because there are no different version.

[@SilentpoetYTwatcher]

@@syedalimohsinmoosavi9664 no, Jesus was quite clear he was the last and final word of God.

[@iandrsaurri625]

So you admit that many translations of the bible have been incorrect but, since we have a lot of the original documents, we can verify/debunk these translations?

[@kipmcewen949]

There are people who will not accept Mark 16: O-20 as being definitively being 'penned" by Mark because there are some of the most ancient manuscripts or fragments that do not contain those verses, while others believe those verses were 'penned' by Mark because manuscripts and fragments that are ancient as well contain those verses. The oldest surviving complete manuscripts translated from the Greek are the Codex Sinainaticus, Codex Alexandrinus and Codex Vaticanus don't have Mark 16: 9-20. Using the argument that in just one of the three has a blank space where verses 9-20 would fit and therefore they were going to be placed there is extrapolation and conjecture at best. In the end, it comes down to faith that those verses belong in the canonn. In the Gospel of John there are several verses that are out of place, but that doesn't mean those verses were uninspired. They can be out of place and not fit between the timeline of events before and after those verses, but that doesn't mean those verses are inspired.

[@kipmcewen949]

Should say 'Mark 16:9-20 at the beginning, and Codex Sinaiticus later on. Sorry for the mistakes. I need to slow down just a little on the typing it in. LOL. Have a blessed day, all.

[@kipmcewen949]

'doesn't mean those verses aren't inspired.' This phone is not helpful at all. LOL.

[@xneutralgodx]

Valid Core plus they dont even know who copied that manuscript. We do not know why certain verus are left out.

[@James-ru5pn]

The question should be WHY hasn’t the Bible been updated and/or revised. It took what, at least two thousand years to get whatever books are included in it all in one place at the decree of someone a long time ago? There hasn’t been another “book” worthy of inclusion since? Christians have been waiting for the ambiguous second coming for over 2000 years. Maybe somebody misinterpreted something? Makes ME wonder…

[@jdaze1]

Because if a man died for all my sins, he'd still be dead as that is the price. Its not about the outer flesh dying, profits nothing, but the carnal flesh as stated in Isaiah 53. You must offer your own WILL to the father and for others. This is the propitiation for your sins. Every man will die for his own inquity. Isaiah said it plainly.

[@franklasker5135]

You are the anti christ

[@filabakari7031]

Point of correction Quran doesn't have versions.

[@unfazedrender2886]

It has 14 different versions

[@abdalrhmanhamdy8848]

What is the relationship of the Qur’an to the subject? Why do you not prove the authenticity of your book without mentioning the Qur’an?

[@kevinleonard2366]

Jeremiah 8:8 How can you say, “We are wise because we have the word of the LORD,” when your teachers have twisted it by writing lies? These wise teachers will fall into the trap of their own foolishness, for they have rejected the word of the LORD. Are they so wise after all?

[@drivebyquipper]

You are twisting the words so ... believe what you will and good luck with that.

[@kevinrosner8676]

The problem with this video is the title. C’mon Dr. Brown . The Bible HAS changed. Even a 100% perfect translation from Biblical Hebrew to English is a ‘change’. The point you are trying to make is: the MESSAGE has not changed. The Word has not changed. You truly give haters ammunition from the start with this error.

[@3DEditor]

"Joseph's Myth"

[@shehzadamurthy1983]

You missed the complete point. Translational is fine. The fact that so many gospels were removed from the bible, what about that? Who gave those popes and kings the right to remove and add books to the bible. No Christian can defend this point.

[@yad_o5654]

The bible is changed by jaws

[@theguyver4934]

The quran never say's that the other books have been changed in fact the quran actually gives us invitation to go and read the previous scriptures in which there is guidance and light to all of mankind

[@yobro6053]

@@theguyver4934 go to the people of the book torah and gospel, lol why would allah need to send him why not just tell moh here's a bible and show him the verses where moh is prophesised .

[@crazyduck7040]

@@yobro6053 the qarun is the orginal version of the Bible

[@shervensherven3625]

Need subtitles please

[@amandat7899]

Sad part is I can’t trust none of you guys .. everyone think they’re way is right. Their book is right

[@candlelight1938]

I chose to follow Jesus , call out to him and pray that he reveals himself to you.❤️

[@gracewright8038]

@@candlelight1938 “Follow Jesus?” To where? And how? The Jewish people in Matthew through John used their feet to follow Jesus (Matthew 14:13). It was a literal physical following, not a spiritual following by Faith. Jesus’ ministry and instructions in these 4 Gospels was to Israel only, not Gentiles like us (Matthew 10:5-6). Jesus instructed His followers to sell all their possessions, leave their families and jobs because they were literally following Him into a literal earthly kingdom. Then came the time when they could follow Him no more (John 13:36). He was leaving; dying, and then going to Heaven. He is now seated in heavenly places (Ephesians 1:20) not going anywhere. But from Heaven our risen Lord sent an apostle to minister instructions from Him to everyone today. He gave us a pattern to follow ( l Timothy 1:16). Paul, the Apostle of the Gentiles (Romans 11:13). Through Paul, Jesus Christ revealed himself in “the mystery” which “had been hid in God since the beginning of the world” (Romans 16:25). It is our duty to read, study and teach so that “all men see what is the fellowship of the mystery” (Ephesians 3:1-9). You don’t have to pray to Jesus to reveal himself to you. God has given us His complete, inspired, and preserved Word. The “mystery of Christ” is found in Romans through Philemon.

[@oufultra6033]

Damnn Amanda did not sugarcoat it

[@quantumleap4023]

What about the name "Yahshua"

[@starlagranillo142]

The name "Jesus" in English has a complicated linguistic history that isn't apparent in modern Bibles. "Jesus" is an Anglicized form of the Greek name Yesous found in the New Testament. Yesous represents the Hebrew Bible name Yeshua, which occurs as "Jeshua" in English Bibles (Ezra 2:2; Neh 7:7). In Medieval English the "J" was pronounced as a "Y." "Yehoshua" Yeshua, in turn, is a shortened form of the name Yehoshua ("Joshua" in English Bibles). Moses' right-hand man, Joshua, has three names in the Bible. Originally, it was Hoshea, but Moses changed it to Yehoshua (Num 13:16). During the Babylonian Exile, it was shorted to Yeshua (Neh 8:17). Hoshea → Yehoshua → Yeshua "Yehoshua" is a compound name consisting of two elements. (1) The prefix "Yeho-" is an abbreviation of the Tetragrammaton, God's Four-Letter Name: Yod-He-Vav-He: YHVH. (Modern scholars think the third letter was pronounced as "W." Thus: YHWH, Yahweh.) Name The 4-Letter Name The "Name" YHVH is used over 6,800 times in the Hebrew Bible. It appears in most English Bibles printed with large and small capital letters: LORD. This stylized euphemism invented by Medieval printers distinguishes it from the words Adon and Adonai, both translated "Lord." In the Hebrew Bible "Yeho-" is a prefix form of God's name. It's used at the beginning of certain proper names: Jehoshaphat, Jehoiachin, Jehonathan (the "J" was pronounced as "Y" in Medieval English). The Tetragrammaton also has a suffix form that occurs in some names: "-yah." In the Greek Old Testament (Septuagint) this ending is spelled "-iah" and appears in English Bible names such as Isaiah, Jeremiah, Nehemiah, and Zechariah. Elijah is Eli-Yah, my God is YHVH. (2) The second element of the name Yeho-shua is a form of the Hebrew verb yasha which means to deliver, save, or rescue. Thus, linguistically, the name "Yehoshua-Yeshua-Jesus" conveys the idea that God (YHVH) delivers, saves, rescues - eventually through his servant Messiah, who bears God's name.

[@heydani6678]

@@starlagranillo142thanks I appreciate it

[@thetrintarianmessianicyahw589]

Read Qur'an 15:91. It says the Qur'an was Shredded. I'm not kidding! Look it up! I'm not Kidding!

[@muslimempirestudentofknowl8650]

It talking about a those who except half of the Quran and deny the other half

[@thetrintarianmessianicyahw589]

@@muslimempirestudentofknowl8650 why did they word it so weird? And didnt uthman literally have to collect fragments and shreds of the Quran to canonize it?

[@muslimempirestudentofknowl8650]

@@thetrintarianmessianicyahw589 Allah is just talking to those who say we except this part but this part no in the Quran and the Quran was never changed

[@thetrintarianmessianicyahw589]

@@muslimempirestudentofknowl8650 Nor was the Over All Biblical Narrative. First John 5:7 and The Women Caught In Adultery were confirmed manuscripts in Early Church Fathers. The Dead Sea Scroll Septuagint Latin Vulgatr and Maseratic Text Confirm the OT is the Same Over All Story. Variants are few and I dont understand why there is so much contraversy about it. Quranic manuscripts are basically just something to point and laugh at but people hide them like skeletons in a closet. It is really weird. The Contextual Changes within the Qurans manuscripts a very few that it doesn't make sense that Muslims are freaking out over it. Christians and Jews (Same Thing) have been openly discussing Textual Variants Since the Writing of The Torah. I'm sure you know what scriptures I'm referring to.

[@monkeypwn77]

So much truth in your words Dr, Brown. Thank The Lord for men such as you.

[@Hqxppy]

He’s so wrong ☠☠

[@theboss8211]

So you sit infront of modern design books and argue against manuscripts that were there before the book you are reading... interesting. I will keep that in mind when I’m doing my researches

[@nonprogrediestregredi1711]

What a disingenuous video! Critical scholars know there are significant changes, additions, and pseudepigrapha in the bible(not to mention contradictions and historical inaccuracies). Just as a couple of examples, the last twelve verses of "Mark" are additions, as is the "John" story of the woman taken in adultery. Both of those have been demonstrated to not be original. There are far more discrepancies than that if anyone checks what textual critics have found. This video tries to put an apologetic spin on it though; nice try.

[@1todobless]

Where do u do ur research?

[@nonprogrediestregredi1711]

@@1todobless I enjoy reading and/or listening to scholars, historians and archaeologists about the contextualized historicity of the Hebrew and Christian bibles. Here's a list of some of them: Mark Smith of Princeton Theological Seminary, John Day of Oxford University, Mark Goodacre of Duke university, Carol Meyers of Duke university, Elizabeth Schrader of Duke university, Christine Hayes of Yale university, Dale Martin of Yale university, William Propp of UCSD, Dennis R McDonald of Claremont school of theology, Bart Ehrman of UNC Chapel Hill, William Dever of the university of Arizona, Isreal Finkelstein of Tel Aviv university, Amos Kloner of the Bar Ilan university, Andrew Henry of Boston university, Julius Wellhausen, and Michael Coogan of Harvard divinity school.

[@karynd2368]

Yes, but what about the verses that have been supernaturally changed???? There are hundreds of them and for a literary masterpiece , now full of punctuation and grammatical errors. For a start, which animal shall lie down with the lamb??? Anyone who knows the word should be able to answer without looking it up.

[@jaysonemile6633]

Karen Dickson it was lion now it’s wolf. So what do u do some people say the word was in the begging meaning Jesus so Jesus was perfect and not the Bible. At least for me I pray and ask for the Holy Spirit to help me discern and know truth.

[@wjamyers]

Three minutes for 10 seconds-worth of a point. Colossal waste of time.

[@roseeeyc9851]

Then don’t watch it

[@wjamyers]

Hi, @@roseeeyc9851. I'm trying to help others to not have THEIR time wasted. It too late for MY time, genius.

[@roseeeyc9851]

@@wjamyers wdym

[@wjamyers]

@@roseeeyc9851 HOWHTTWT

[@yosefben-adam3581]

some translations are grossly wrong and in fact the true and correct translations shed much more light on the truth. It may seem trivial at first glance but the deeper meanings behind the mistranslations are intentional. For example a common translation of Paul and im paraphrasing, "Dont let women speak at the congregation", the truth is the correct translation is "that woman" meaning Jezebel and churches and followers of tradition have used this lie, from the lying pen of the scribe to inflict spiritual harm and oppress women for centuries.....I respectfully disagree with you my brother, but the spirit of prophecy and the Word of truth can be found in the scriptures. But we need discernment and study, research the original translations, preferably Hebrew to see what it really says. Shalom

[@mr.mcpicklesthegreat9382]

Ok but you never said how we know it hasn’t been changed

[@feorgenotgloyd7624]

It has been changed slave owners used it to justify their actions and they hurry changed it so the people that believe in it can still have some moral ground

[@mr.mcpicklesthegreat9382]

@@feorgenotgloyd7624 oh it’s impossible that it hasn’t been changed, and also I don’t think the slavery aspects have been taken out, mostly just looked past. Like if people wanted a moral standing with the Bible the Old Testament wouldn’t even be Included

[@feorgenotgloyd7624]

@waffles because it was changed 🤦‍♂️

[@feorgenotgloyd7624]

@waffles just like how hating gays is in the Bible 🤦‍♂️ I guarantee you if homosexuality becomes normalized 300 years from now the Bible will immediately change

[@defenestratefalsehoods]

Mark 16:9-20 are not found in the oldest bibles and the story of jesus and the adulterer was also added centuries later to the bible and both had jesus speaking.

[@pjfrog10]

Good job you are exactly right

[@everlastthomas3549]

Sure. The bible has not been changed in the context they are attacking it.

[@yawnealakasivar1750]

Where is Muhammed s Quran bro ? Why he didn't leave anything plus let's say Quran has not been changed, it means that it of from Allah ?? İ found sampoo bottle in my basement, it was written that was produced 1998, 24 years my sampoo bottle has not been changed, come and see, same writing So my sampoo is from Allah ? Allah sent it, Allah told me yesterday, come and refute it

[@zamorapetals7996]

Quran has been changed too. Ex Muslim speaking.

[@cashmandrummer2917]

Hey! Jesus loves you! He died for your sins on the cross and rose again 3 days later! All you need to do to accept Gods gift is believe in him and what he did, And you need to repent(turn from sin and follow Jesus) and ask him for forgiveness in prayer. And remember that Jesus is God! He is three in one, the father, the son, and the Holy Spirit! Have a good day!:)

[@defenestratefalsehoods]

But it has been changed. The bibles from the 3rd and 4th centuries does not have Mark 16:9-20. They also dont have the story of jesus and the adulterer. How can you lie about the bible not being changed?

[@jamiewilkinson2323]

Except.... seeing how many changes have been made over the years only brings into question the validity of what is there already. So there are a handful of ancient manuscripts and thousands of copies of those ancient manuscripts - who's to say what are on those oldest scripts are the truth? We do not have the original manuscript or even the copies of the original or even the copies of the copies of the original manuscript. Whose to say that the original manuscript wasn't burned in favor of the changed versions that we have now? This argument falls flat - there is mountains of proof of the changes made to the Bible that you pointed out yourself. Therefore, what we see in the Bible cannot logically be the truth or valid. This is a quick edit after the fact - I am not saying that what is in the Bible cannot be true - it certainly can. However, what I am saying is that it cannot be implicitly trusted as billions have been taught.

[@lazylion9548]

you must not have heard of the dead sea scrolls Dr? how about the old testament???? Im sorry is not not considered a bible? the old testament? no no no, thats no good this new one though that's the right one Christians have to be the most gullible religious folk in all of human history

[@devonschmitz4113]

@Emperors Sword and that's exactly the message of the gospel! Fear not man who can kill the body, but fear God who can destroy both body and soul in hell! What we do in this life since you have pin pointed that we carry on, is carried over to the after life and we will stand before God naked. That's why Jesus came to die for us because all have sinned and been led astray from God, and if we die in this state we will forever be separated from Him. He died and paid those sins for you so you could be reunited with Him and your soul could live for Him and be healed by Him and live forever more with Him when we leave this body. God bless you in Jesus' name.

[@hellwithit]

The Bible has more than one canonized version!! This dude does not know what he talks about. Bible is a translation of the septuagenarian. Greek translation of Jewish stories from original Hebrew. It’s so poorly written that it’s believed that Jewish people had a day of morning.

[@Kman.]

"The holy Bible must have been, inspired by God and not by men. I would not if I could believe, that good men wrote it to deceive. And bad men would not if they could, proceed to write a book so good. And certainly no crazy man could 'ere conceive it's wondrous plan. I pray what other types of men, than these three groups do comprehend? Hence the Bible must have been, inspired of God and not by men". Like s/one said, "The Bible is God breathed, and God doesn't waste His breath" :)

[@childofyah9636]

PAUL IS ONE OF THEM!!!

[@soubagunas142]

definitely waste of time

[@ibrahimhadid9257]

The Quran was the only book never changed, go to any mosque in the planet, all Qurans are the exact same!

[@Ivy-ok9nl]

ibrahim hadid Quran has many errors here’s just an example: Qur'an 86:7 says that sperm originates from the backbones and the ribs, a theory similiar to another erroneous theory proposed by Hippocrates in 5th century BC (1000 years before Islam).

[@zebrasbean2385]

@@Ivy-ok9nl it says semen in the Quran not sperm only sperm is created in testicles

[@kalturnix]

@@Ivy-ok9nl Nope. Your small brain can't comprehend what the verse means and it's actually a scientific miracle, look it up.

[@kalturnix]

@Ezekiel 33:6 Scientists proved that the Quran is scientifically correct, you just got a low IQ.

[@zamorapetals7996]

Kalturnix the Quran says the sun sets in a murky water. How can the sun set in water?! Ex Muslim speaking. Quran has many errors and contradictions. Watch Christian prince on KZbin. Type in Quran errors from Christian prince