How Electricity is Generated: 1960 Intro Training, Electrical Generators, DC AC, Nuclear Reactors

[@sumitnarkhede.3105]

BEST SIMPLE AND DETAILED PRESENTATION THANK YOU SIR.

[@ComputerHistoryArchivesProject]

HI @sumitnarkhede.3105, very glad you enjoyed it. Thank you for your feedback! ~ VK

[@RetroElijah1982]

Super informative(and cool) video

[@ComputerHistoryArchivesProject]

Glad you liked it! I appreciate the great feedback. It was fun to see this restored to its original clarity! ~

[@tadonplane8265]

This is middle school science class. But in 1960 it was junior high.

[@nmaedu.100]

yes very good way to understanding of electricity basics

[@ComputerHistoryArchivesProject]

Hi @nmaedu.100, very glad you enjoyed it! ~

[@fefafafe5059]

Nice Explication

[@SelvaRajRabel]

very very usefull ❤

[@ComputerHistoryArchivesProject]

Glad it was helpful!

[@thesteelrodent1796]

Neat old film. Reminds me of elementary school phsysics class. The historical facts are a little fuzzy and not entirely accurate, but I guess for the explanation they're trying to make, it's not that important that half of what they show isn't directly related to Faraday.

[@Larochaess]

Tuhan tidak akan menciptakan sedih, tanpa merencanakan bahagia setelahnya. One day you will be the best version of u

[@ComputerHistoryArchivesProject]

Thank you!

[@intel386DX]

We never pass the steem era 😅😂 fantastic video.😊

[@ComputerHistoryArchivesProject]

Hi @intel386DX, thank you for the great feedback!

[@ramirosuarez9537]

Nice explanation for the time

[@ComputerHistoryArchivesProject]

Yes, the clarity was refreshing too. Thank you for your feedback!

[@ramirosuarez9537]

@@ComputerHistoryArchivesProject New subscriber ... check Thanks to you!

[@skivvy3565]

Informative. Concise. Doesn’t patronize and insult your intelligence. Not monosyllabic bloated clickbait. We really have regressed as a civilization lol

[@richardgray8593]

Needs some hip-hop beats in the sound track, yo.

[@ComputerHistoryArchivesProject]

Hi @skivvy3565, glad you enjoyed it! Good observations, have to agree w/you. : )

[@OldWorldAscension]

Meaning, it's doesn't sound like cheap salesman talk.

[@rbk2745]

Wonderful. 👏👏👏

[@ComputerHistoryArchivesProject]

Hi @rbk2745, glad you enjoyed it!

[@tangoalpha8381]

Excellent video 👍🇧🇷👍🇧🇷

[@ComputerHistoryArchivesProject]

HI @tangoalpha8381, glad you enjoyed the video! ~ VK

[@bblod4896]

Cool. I remember those movies on 16mm film? Been so long, I've forgotten 😂

[@ComputerHistoryArchivesProject]

Hi @bblod4896, and bet there are a hundred more out there waiting to be rediscovered and restored! Always time to learn more. : ) @bblod4896

[@bblod4896]

@@ComputerHistoryArchivesProject Yes, or relive my youth 😂

[@rahulsonkamble5926]

Best knowledge sir

[@ComputerHistoryArchivesProject]

Hi @rahulsonkamble5926, glad you liked it.

[@MrGeraldino250]

Excelent thanks

[@ComputerHistoryArchivesProject]

Glad you enjoyed it!

[@kc4cvh]

2:07 Burgess batteries. Recognized by their stripes, remembered for their service. I haven't seen them in a long time.

[@ComputerHistoryArchivesProject]

Yes, good to see the Burgess name again! Thanks for your feedback!

[@Salehdolfin]

I have a mini dynamo which gives 24 to 27 volts in output but the amperes are very less, how to increase the amperes? And same volt only increase ampere 😊😊

[@ComputerHistoryArchivesProject]

One suggestion was to increase the ampere to volt ratio, you can connect multiple power supplies in parallel. When power supplies are connected in parallel, the voltage remains the same, but the total current available increases. - Never tried this, but it is an idea.

[@ronaldochaveiro4446]

Muito top 73 aí voz do Deserto RJ br

[@ComputerHistoryArchivesProject]

73's : )

[@Franklin-jj4jz]

10:33, Downtown Portland, Oregon.

[@ComputerHistoryArchivesProject]

HI @Franklin-jj4jz, very interesting, thanks for that info! ..

[@EmmanuelMatabaro]

Could you tell me please what drives the turbine blades to turn, is it the force of the steam or the heat of the steam?🤷

[@ComputerHistoryArchivesProject]

Hi @EmmanuelMatabaro, I believe the expanding nature of the steam causes the turbines to turn; a high volume of expanding gas pushing its way through and out. That's my understanding. Good question, thank you!

[@EmmanuelMatabaro]

@@ComputerHistoryArchivesProject Thank you too

[@InfiniteLoop]

very cool video, I love these old science shows, but I have to wonder, in 1960 when their was shown, how many of the viewers said "did he say that thing had a communist 'tater in it?"

[@frankowalker4662]

I'm more worried about people who wear a steam driven turban. Painful.

[@ComputerHistoryArchivesProject]

Hi @InfiniteLoop, good one! : )

[@victimovtalent6036]

Transfering kinetic energy to other places

[@gsamygsamyngovindasamy9530]

I like you welcome iam Indian village tecnecian ❤

[@ComputerHistoryArchivesProject]

Hi @gsamygsamyngovindasamy9530, very glad you enjoyed it. Thank you for your feedback! ~ VK

[@Lackaustausch]

AC⚡DC 🤘😁

[@ComputerHistoryArchivesProject]

Hi @Lackaustausch, 😁

[@PravdaSeed.96]

💙 Master 💙 Nikola Tesla 🧲⚡🧲⚡🧲 🌍☸️☯️🕉️🌎

[@ComputerHistoryArchivesProject]

Yes, much so.

[@MartinThePanda]

They don't teach like they used to no more.

[@PeterMilanovski]

Lots of explanation but still doesn't say where the electric charge comes from! This video just shows you how to harvest it, and that's really all that is happening! And if you are able to harvest it from somewhere or something else, then I want to know what these machines are getting it from! Clearly the energy existed somewhere else before it was harvested! The real question is where? And this leads to the next question of free energy! If energy wasn't free, then whatever is harvesting this energy should not be able to get it due to energy not being free to be harvested in the first place! I don't buy this explanation of the energy comes from the work out it to get energy out! Even if I use a hand crank generator, the electric charge isn't coming from my body! There's something there that no one seems to be saying anything about and that's probably because no one knows! It's like a generator is plucking electricity out of thin air? I think that this just demonstrates how little we know and understand about the one thing that has changed the way we live!

[@ComputerHistoryArchivesProject]

Hi @PeterMilanovski, you have some good points and good questions! Looking at the research in this field is quite interesting. This film does not go into the physics of electron movement or vibration, or the potential difference such things cause across a distance. Schools used to teach that electrons flowed from one point to another. Other theories talk about vibrational interaction of potential states. It is a fascinating thing to research and explore the theories. The film just gives some practical theory on how it can be demonstrated with physical objects. Perhaps others viewing this may have some other helpful thoughts. Thanks for the deeper dive into this! ~ VK, CHAP

[@PeterMilanovski]

@@ComputerHistoryArchivesProject thank you for your response, I think that the point I wanted to make was that at some point in time we were being taught that we were the centre of the universe but today we think differently, and then there's that time when the earth was flat, and then not to some people thinking that it's flat again! The talk given in this video is a sort of understanding, it's not the only way it can be understood but just one of possibly many. I could possibly talk about this all week and you could possibly learn that there is yet another way of understanding what is going on, but that's not important or at least I don't think that it's important anymore... I used to think that it was once apon a time, but it didn't take long to realise that the general public doesn't understand and nor do they care! The people who should care are only interested in upholding old ideas or protecting their own Noble prize winning ideas regardless if they are right or wrong.... I have seen so many great people who have proposed great ideas and explanations that were closer to the truth but were rejected by the scientific community because they couldn't understand it only to find out many years later that it was right and that he was way ahead of his time! Here! I will let you in on the biggest misconception in the history of science.... Going by your response I believe that this should not be too difficult for you to understand.... We are taught that the atom is made of a proton which is supposed to be positively charged, a neutron which either has no charge or carries a charge somewhere in between the proton and electron (I have yet to find a clear definition of the neutron) and finally the electron which is supposed to carry a negative charge! Now... This is where I have a problem, a long time ago Benjamin Franklin wrote about the electric charge from his experiments performed... His conclusion led to his explanation of and in his words was..... The electric charge is a problem of accounting.... It's like a bank account, when you have more money in your account, you will be in credit and we will call this positive, when you owe money, you are in debt and we will call this negative! Now, there's nothing in his statement that suggests that there is a positive and negative charge! Meaning that there's only one electric charge and you can have either more or less of it! So this would suggest that the proton in an atom has more charge than both the neutron and electron.... Which is supposed to have the least amount of charge.... Which would also mean that a battery which is marked with a positive and negative symbol should mean that one side is carrying more charge than the other, and just like how hot will flow into cold, the side of a battery which carries more charge will flow into the side with the least! You can see the same effect by putting two rechargeable batteries together with both batteries at different charge states, the battery with a higher charge state will flow charge into the other lower charge state battery.... And just like heat, the electric charge is looking for equilibrium which is what we would consider as the battery being flat.... It still has a charge, but both plates are now equal, and without the potential difference, there's no reason for the charge to flow.... Once you see the problem with the explanation of the atom and the problem with the explanation of the electric charge, you slowly begin to find out things that make sense... In this video you will hear talking like there's both a positive and negative charge... Benjamin Franklin was correct, there's only one charge! And surface area determines how much charge will be carried.... That's why there is an oxide layer on plates, the rough oxide layer contains more surface area than that of a smooth layer.... Makes sense doesn't it.... There's a lot more but I'm not going to get into it here... This is already to long as a post.... My research and newfound understanding has led me to the understanding of what gravity is and more importantly what it isn't.... You wouldn't believe how simple science can be and still work... Imagine being able to look at anything and automatically be able to see how and why something works and how it's connected with its immediate surroundings... Honestly it's mind blowing.... I have seen things that everyone else can't... It's right there in front of your nose but you can't see it because you were taught to not see it! Ohhhh you have your explanation for what you see but it's so disjointed that you don't really see what is going on.... Words can make or break an understanding...

[@marekkowalski6767]

tnx 🇵🇱 Warsaw.