"Haha look at that big boat hope it's friendly" - 90% of the world
@FBI-Agent.2 жыл бұрын
"I hope it's friendly" last words after 30 ships open fire and bombard the land
@Automaton_unit2 жыл бұрын
OPEN FIRE -people in the big boat
@Snipsnop2602 жыл бұрын
And that's why Britain won't get good deals after Brexit haha
@ieatIegos2 жыл бұрын
“Haha look at that big boat hope it’s friendly” Famous Last Sentences.
@laffey65462 жыл бұрын
@@Snipsnop260 🤣
@paulluka20292 жыл бұрын
Someone once said if your country wasn't invaded by the British then it doesn't exist and turns out they are 90% correct 😂😂😂
@stevelowe26472 жыл бұрын
There has to be more than 220 countries though, so if only 22 haven't been invaded, it must be more like 93/94%
@tastyfalcon17882 жыл бұрын
@@stevelowe2647 There are 193 countries in the world today. At the height of the British empire, there were far less
@laurakastrup2 жыл бұрын
Jokes on you, we invaded the British (Dane)
@stevelowe26472 жыл бұрын
@@laurakastrup no, you invaded Anglo Saxons in pre-joined England, let alone Great Britain. And that was 1500 years ago. And it was mostly the Norse..
@maxdavis77222 жыл бұрын
@@stevelowe2647 eh, technically they did invade England after it formed. Not sure if that’s the same at all as the British empire.
@Myviewoftheworldful2 жыл бұрын
“Everyone’s a gangster until British ships arrive on your shore” - Ghandi
@karnraaat8362 жыл бұрын
Who is ghandi
@sarahgibbs99312 жыл бұрын
@@karnraaat836 how do you not now about him?!?!?!?!?!?
@karnraaat8362 жыл бұрын
@@sarahgibbs9931 is he from ghana
@sarahgibbs99312 жыл бұрын
@@karnraaat836 I know about him….
@sarahgibbs99312 жыл бұрын
Oop
@ianmacfarlane12412 жыл бұрын
Make your mind up - Britain and England aren't interchangeable terms. Prior to 1707 you're talking about England, whereas after 1707 it's Britain.
@sophiechatterton43862 жыл бұрын
England is still the powerhouse of britian
@stevenenglish31472 жыл бұрын
Ian, I'm a Yank who's Mother was born in Oxford. I didn't know that. Thank you for educating me.
@ianmacfarlane12412 жыл бұрын
@Steven English 1707 was the Act of Union where the Kingdom of Great Britain was formed. (Not yet Northern Ireland - the history of the English then the British in Ireland is far too complicated to go into here). That's why you'll have maybe heard about the Scottish independence movement - trying to end 300+ years of Union... hopefully.
@TheSpikeg762 жыл бұрын
I know. England isn't an island either.
@jamesmichaels49792 жыл бұрын
England and Scotland both had colonies
@daviel1005 Жыл бұрын
The biggest legacy for me is that English is the most widely spoken language in the world both in terms of absolute numbers and in the number of countries it is spoken in.
@Android18uk Жыл бұрын
But that's actually mainly due to the USA global influence rather than the UK.
@davehoward22 Жыл бұрын
@@Android18uk The English language was spread around the world long before the usa became a world influence
@Android18uk Жыл бұрын
@@davehoward22 @dave h Yeah, it was obviously spread a lot by British colonalism originally but I believe this impact would have eventually faded had it not been for the global economic, cultural and political influence of the US. Just Hollywood movies alone had a massive impact on the spread of the English language across the globe.
@user-bs5qr5ie4s Жыл бұрын
@@Android18uk not true England colonised a quarter of world population So even without America culture English will have still.been widely spoken
@Android18uk Жыл бұрын
@@user-bs5qr5ie4s Yes, it is true, but at the same time, many other European languages are widely spoken too, particularly French and Spanish. Also, the main language of the US could have been Dutch. But the fact that it did end up being English and it became the language of academia and Hollywood movies and a lot of music from the US, is pretty much why English is the lingua franca rather than another European language.
@pangs37982 жыл бұрын
the fact that we even speak their language here in comment section proves how relevant they are.
@piyushjaiswal92832 жыл бұрын
Irrelevant
@everyonesfavoritegin2 жыл бұрын
That's because the U.S founding fathers took the kings english as a fu to the crown
@adamc91 Жыл бұрын
@stan down keep saying it won’t make it true..
@ChrisCrossClash8 ай бұрын
@@piyushjaiswal9283Jealous much? Love it 😂
@strbst20756 ай бұрын
@@everyonesfavoritegin that’s not how that happened. America has been working for Britain ever since
@TMMNETWORK2 жыл бұрын
When ur in search of tea and conquer the world by accident
@437livin2 жыл бұрын
They just had a really good Risk game goin’
@michaelkarlin37272 жыл бұрын
Yup
@mishham63882 жыл бұрын
I always take Australia in risk as an Aussie but it's also not a bad strategy haha
@jackkenny41942 жыл бұрын
@@mishham6388 i did that before as I had an alliance with my friend but then snuck up and destroyed his Asian control and lost him the game hehe
@mishham63882 жыл бұрын
@@jackkenny4194 cool story bro needed more ninjas
@sgtpepper6481 Жыл бұрын
This episode claims British troops landed in India in 1858 as a result of the US War of Independence. In reality British troops had already been in India for at least 100 years by that date (including forces of the East India Company).1858 is the year Britain established the British Raj in India, ruling until Indian independence in 1947, just following WW2. Independence partially granted due to India's huge contribution to the allies during WW1 & WW2. It is from this era that the highly regarded Ghurka regiment was established consisting of Nepalese soldiers serving in the British army - and continues to this day.
@Sandi_shores_lands_fish Жыл бұрын
Oooh Ghurka Ghurka Mohammed jeehad
@ylberhoxha1353 Жыл бұрын
The video has so many incorrect information
@Sandi_shores_lands_fish Жыл бұрын
@@ylberhoxha1353 well i put a jihad on you
@rajanrairealty897910 ай бұрын
only aquater of india rest was indepednt princely states look it up also nepal etc afg bhtan sep indep
@xenomorph7339 ай бұрын
I was going to say the British empire gave up on the US rebellion because India was more important but they were there long before that
@Catpain_Tailspin2 жыл бұрын
Hey info graphics I would like to see a video explaining Why gunpowder was around for hundreds of years but why did it take so long for breach loaded weapons and cartridge fired bullets to be developed?
@kbrock91462 жыл бұрын
Because it was created in China, and it was used by the Taoists as medicine and therefore looked at as a medical tool, not "Hmmm. What small handheld things should we create that will then use this to expel small projectiles towards whatever it's aimed at."
@mastersitorou82892 жыл бұрын
This might be another cool episode.
@the_once-and-future_king.2 жыл бұрын
Purely down to not having precision engineering.
@wiseferret47452 жыл бұрын
Germany invented the first breech loaded gun, and Paris invented the first cartridge fired bullets. Both were invented between 1840 and 1850, which was a tumultuous time in the world with a lot of wars and battles being fought between countries all over the world, especially in Europe, and it is those wars that led to the assassination of Franz Ferdinand in 1914 and the beginning of WWI.
@joyboy65352 жыл бұрын
knowledge cause people were inferior back in the days so they had to wait for human evolution to take place and produce such smart person that can develop it into a weapon. this pretty much standard for everything like we might find immortality within next 50-100yrs something we can’t atm due to limitations
@stevengruber572 жыл бұрын
British shipbuilders in the 17th and maybe 18th centuries may not have been the best, but by the 19th century they were far ahead of the rest of the world. British engineers generally in that period were world leading.
@fact-o-pedio4603 Жыл бұрын
Does that have to with white race Brain power or just sheer coincidence that even Sudan could become as powerful as America one day if they worked hard ???
@filozof372 Жыл бұрын
I think british navy was most powerful navy since like mid 17th century
@GyanTvAmit11 ай бұрын
british had looted money so no wonder
@Rizzlelid2 жыл бұрын
Just a completely unforeseen coincidence that as soon as Scotland and England go on to create Britain it explodes in power. I dislike it when you use England and Britain as the same thing, overshadowing the many Welsh, Irish and Scottish lives lost in both world wars and our contributions to the empire. Like the British flag is literally just a combination of the Scottish and English flag.
@arryn7862 жыл бұрын
Why do you even care. Should be happy you’re being glossed over in this💀🥴.
@Rizzlelid2 жыл бұрын
@@arryn786 it’s just objectively and fundamentally wrong to interchange the world Britain and England. Makes zero sense and completely disregards the English flag.
@arryn7862 жыл бұрын
@@Rizzlelid They’re American. Do you think they have the mental capacity to understand this? I hate to break it to you but wales isn’t really as known as England or even Scotland🤷♂️.
@epicdude9992 жыл бұрын
Its just what americans do I've learned to live with it
@swnamii Жыл бұрын
@@arryn786 I don’t disagree that Wales is less known, but for an information channel, you‘d think you‘d be less ignorant and be correct on your facts. Especially as something as obvious as referring to the correct name of said topic.
@WelshWing982 жыл бұрын
Infographics: “We’re going to be talking about what happened between the 16th Century and 20th Century” Scottish, Welsh and Irish viewers: “Pack up and go home boys, we’re not getting a mention”
@Mute0404042 жыл бұрын
Nowadays, some pretend the Empire had 'nothing to do with me guv'
@HonestMan112 Жыл бұрын
@@Mute040404 They forget the darien scheme, scottish colonisation in carolina and many more projects
@AquarianAgeApostle Жыл бұрын
Glasgow was even dubbed the second city of the empire by Queen Victoria. But do infographics care not to include? Nope
@davemi002 жыл бұрын
US Colonies were important mainly for our Huge White Pines. The trees were marked, Property of the King
@2000rayc2 жыл бұрын
they made strong war ships
@markjohnston27802 жыл бұрын
The statement “the sun never sets on the British empire” is still true 🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧
@williamcastaneda81242 жыл бұрын
That’s coz we don’t get sun in the first place
@arranmorton34532 жыл бұрын
Now “the sun never shines on the British empire” is probably more accurate
@maxdavis77222 жыл бұрын
@@arranmorton3453 why? Overseas territories means that the statement is still accurate.
@2000rayc2 жыл бұрын
and france
@jamesoakley45702 жыл бұрын
@@maxdavis7722 how? if the sun never sets on the British Empire can we never get sun?
@drnobody4182 жыл бұрын
This channel always helps me to put the world into a time travel perspective.
@liftusup92082 жыл бұрын
Technically we are still living in English era if you look at grand scale of timeline. US and co. are new forms of this empire.
@marvou68114 ай бұрын
the US isnt an empire
@ethanmartell-md7xb3 ай бұрын
Not really but I see what you’re getting at
@bc10Comrade2 жыл бұрын
Technically they didn't conquer 90% of the globe but they did attack 90% of countries
@viperplatinum30342 жыл бұрын
He said that literally in the beginning of the video
@raymondpendergrass67722 жыл бұрын
Invade. Not conquer
@nellemoor21922 жыл бұрын
@@raymondpendergrass6772 Right
@keysandcoffees94412 жыл бұрын
Video Title: “How England Managed To *Invade* 90% Of The World” First 12 Seconds Of Video Narration: “Britain was able to *invade* 90% of the countries around the world” This guy: TeChNiCaLlY tHeY dIdN’t *CoNqUeR!!!!!!* 🤨
@chattaboxxx23322 жыл бұрын
To be fair the one country they completely lost against was one of the least technologically advanced and smallest of all the countries they invaded. NZ.
@noahtylerpritchett26822 жыл бұрын
As a American I'm proud to have British ancestry.
@tulipalll2 жыл бұрын
Same! British gang FTW!
@noahtylerpritchett26822 жыл бұрын
@@tulipalll RULE BRITANNIA!
@GyanTvAmit11 ай бұрын
😂this is not your fault your history teacher will not tell you dark truth
@noahtylerpritchett268211 ай бұрын
@@GyanTvAmit thats vague
@ethanmartell-md7xb3 ай бұрын
@@GyanTvAmityeah I’m American but I believe I understand the annoyance of my fellow Americans saying they are something because of their heritage
@TheFatmat52 жыл бұрын
Hi - Love the video but can we please break the common American tradition of using England, Great Britain, The United Kingdom etc interchangeably. Also FYI the flag used was only officially adopted between 1707 and 1801 - After 1801 we use the flag we still use today. Scotland, Wales, and Ireland all played a very important part in the British identity and history!
@bucknellsurveying67862 жыл бұрын
Interesting video, shame flag wrong throughout 🇬🇧
@TY-sx3jb2 жыл бұрын
Also called the Netherlands “Holland”, bit of a shambles
@Rowlph88882 жыл бұрын
Why being so pedantic.who cares about the interchangeability. Plus, the Union Jack is a mesmerising flag, so why not see as much of it as possible.The George Cross does not compare visually, for anyone except a Stubborn, cantankerous Englishman
@TheFatmat52 жыл бұрын
@@Rowlph8888 Scots, Welshmen, and northern Irishmen often don’t like to be described as English that’s why. If anything it’s less about cantankerous Englishmen and more about acknowledging the other nations. I want the union to remain so that’s why I emphasise my point. Edit: Also I wanted them to put the correct flag (From 1801) rather than the union flag of 1707. Still the Union flag but updated. It's similar to me using the 13 colonies flag for the US as a whole.
@rizzonator987 Жыл бұрын
@@Rowlph8888 because its factually wrong? If I called the USA texas it wouldn't exactly be right would it?
@doctorcrichton Жыл бұрын
And at the height of their power the British declared war on slavery. Made it illegal everywhere they went !! The first power in the world to be able to and make an attempt. As per usual most of the world followed suit... eventually.
@oyunboldboldbaatar55198 ай бұрын
They basically then proceeded to use Indian “servants” instead.
@actonman72912 жыл бұрын
The Brits and the Iberic Peninsula Aka Portugal and Spain are the powers that shaped America.
@michaelhall75462 жыл бұрын
And now we shape them 😃
@GH291112 жыл бұрын
@@michaelhall7546 how?
@caleb52572 жыл бұрын
@@GH29111 he’s American like me. Too much pride. That’s why the response was like that 😅 I apologize w
@caleb52572 жыл бұрын
That’s accurate. Having our own government and running of Britain for independence. An Spain and Cuba war we helped for property. Also taking over all of what is USA by killing and stealing land from both Indians and Mexicans. Writing it out makes us sound like awful people 😅 but hey!! All the countries was trying to gain power and land during this time.
@mmet0diev2 жыл бұрын
@@caleb5257 I respect your response more than the guy it is toward.
@iattacku27732 жыл бұрын
Britain: “ my son it’s your time now” America: “ yes father”
@michaelhall75462 жыл бұрын
Who's daddy now cuz?
@GH291112 жыл бұрын
@@michaelhall7546 Michael you’re the daddy now
@kirkmorrison61312 жыл бұрын
Except we see England as the Mother Country. " Yes, Mum"
@NarwahlGaming2 жыл бұрын
**bashes head with pan** "NOT THE MAMA!"
@rockking11682 жыл бұрын
@@NarwahlGaming 🤣🤣🤣
@tristinkirby2 жыл бұрын
Thanks to our British chaps us rowdy, gun loving, freedom shouting, non tea tax paying colonists of the new Americas came to be. Thank you George Washington and the continental army. Much love for our British family from Texas
@bazzingabomb2 жыл бұрын
love texas, thats proper america.
@a8-bit_gamer072 жыл бұрын
So I’m pretty much your dad
@deanb60202 жыл бұрын
Texas is definitely the heart of America!
@gwho2 жыл бұрын
@@bazzingabomb in terms of values and culture, but that land was very much mexico lol
@leicestergux Жыл бұрын
Good old England 🇬🇧 what a place 😎😎💪💪❤️❤️
@eternalthor49672 жыл бұрын
Between 1810s and 1880s was the heights of British power They directly ruled 20% of world population and indirectly ruled 4%(princely states of India) They had informal empire on 40-50% (like china)of the world No nation had ever came close to the British in controlling the most of the world Pretty impressive for that tiny island
@gabrielmartinelli25492 жыл бұрын
It’s height was actually in the 1920s
@krithigachandrasekar45912 жыл бұрын
I don't think impressive is the right word to use. I think somewhere the psychology behind all this is twisted
@gabrielmartinelli25492 жыл бұрын
@@krithigachandrasekar4591 Well I don’t think you’ve studied much history, because of any other civilisation had the same means to do what we did, they would have. It’s human psychology, not British psychology.
@archivesoffantasy5560 Жыл бұрын
@@gabrielmartinelli2549You’re right but tbf he didn’t say it was exclusively British.
@aariyanmahmud301 Жыл бұрын
@@krithigachandrasekar4591 gotta give credit where it's due
@johncrookes91192 жыл бұрын
How can such an informative channel not understand Britain/UK/Engalnd/Wales etc...?
@teoengchin2 жыл бұрын
The English were quite strategic. In many places they backed rival factions and helped them overthrow the existing rulers instead of going directly against them. Example: helping the 2nd in line to the throne get rid of the heir apparent. Back in the day, all governments were monarchies, and whenever there are monarchies, there are always competing claims and feuding noble houses
@Lukey1112 жыл бұрын
Britain not England the two aren't interchangeable
@teoengchin2 жыл бұрын
@@Lukey111 Most of the early colonization was done by England, before Britain was united. And the individuals involved were English, not Scottish or Welsh
@Lukey1112 жыл бұрын
@@teoengchin your either trying to lies or very uneducated before britain was formed officially armies were still consisted of English archers and cavalry scottish infantry Welsh pikeman This is very well documented
@teoengchin2 жыл бұрын
@@Lukey111Kingdom of Great Britain was formed in 1707. People were using muskets and flintlocks by then
@Lukey1112 жыл бұрын
@@teoengchin that was the union of great Britain but as I have already stated the 3 nations had been on colonial expeditions together as early as the 1400s
@Anglo_Saxon12 жыл бұрын
There was also the settler colonies i.e North America, Australia,New Zealand which as well as being about making money, were also about putting down roots.
@adamrichardadamdegoogle194421 күн бұрын
The whole world: *exists.* The British: “so anyway, I started blasting.”
@SkyHighGaming882 жыл бұрын
Being a small island I always say GB had a sort of “ small man/country syndrome” and had to let every other country know they weren’t messing around
@HarryWessex2 жыл бұрын
Not rely as 5 out of 7 of our immediate neighbours were/are smaller.
@kylebanner7882 жыл бұрын
@@paulscala2907 that sounds like cope
@jedryan7272 жыл бұрын
@@paulscala2907 God save the Queen!
@Dunlop19962 жыл бұрын
Ya pretty much spot on
@Ccccc-mi3tr2 жыл бұрын
GB is not a country
@mrkermit2235 Жыл бұрын
Britain: “son you will do great things” America: “we sure will mother”
@Benjamin-ev7yv Жыл бұрын
Britain plays the Greece to Americas Rome
@johncane230411 ай бұрын
@@Benjamin-ev7yvancient China was a super power also during that period.
@Benjamin-ev7yv11 ай бұрын
@@johncane2304 But the UK and USA are the inheritors of the Western Civilization, whereas China is in the East.
@jenlin6715 Жыл бұрын
After reading a book about the history of Britain ( David starkey) I learnt so much about the fabric of the country itself, it’s entire history before William the conquerer making the country run and influenced by many cultures who are good at invasion. One of the most influential were Norman’s who themselves came from vikings (sea gangsters). Along with strong rulers like Elizabeth 1st and navy it made the UK more powerful despite being an island. I have a love hate take on British empire but you have to give Britain it’s flowers for at one point owning so much of the world
@strategist7190 Жыл бұрын
The fact that we're an island actually made us stronger, we didn't need to have a huge army, (not saying we didn't have one) we just needed a huge navy
@Finix421 Жыл бұрын
@@strategist7190Well you guys like dominated the sea for like almost 4 centuries(1600 up to early 1900)
@jovemgafanhoto4512 Жыл бұрын
Invaders and liars, without lies they would never beat the spanish empire.
@gordongekko3174 Жыл бұрын
its like saying, that the brits graped and the countries which got graped were asking for it
@wasp3959 Жыл бұрын
Mate the Normans were the French and the Danes were vikings. The Normans and the Vikings were 2 totally different people's and the two of them invaded England at the same time in 1066 due to a competing bid to rule England.
@jonathanwilliams96972 жыл бұрын
It really isn't difficult to understand the difference between England, Britain and the UK. England - one of the four 'home nations' of the UK. Britain - The Island of Britain which is made up of three of the four 'home nations' - England, Scotland and Wales. The UK - All four 'home nations' - the entirety of the island of Britain and the remaining 'home nation' of Northern Ireland.
@wcg19891 Жыл бұрын
The problem is what term do you call a citizen of the UK? British? If so, how does that make sense with those in Northern Ireland? US has a similar issue.
@ihatealderney Жыл бұрын
@@wcg19891For Northern Ireland it's complicated. For citizenship, people born there can literally choose whether they're Irish, British or both if at least one parent was either.
@gailainsley6939 Жыл бұрын
Remember British when you are typing in English 😂🇬🇧
@ives35722 жыл бұрын
"The story of the British empire helps to explain the roots of most British people: white, black, and Asian." - Sadiq Khan
@TheFightingRoo2 жыл бұрын
As an indigenous person I loved this for its education value. Although you could of saved a whole Doco & just said Piracy. I really do appreciate how you presented the information.
@paulwilson2651 Жыл бұрын
How is it educational when the poster doesn't know the difference between England and Britain?
@mimaza100 Жыл бұрын
@@paulwilson2651and who cares.. This island is irrelevant to rest of the world
@shinji1264 Жыл бұрын
Fail, it's because of engineering and clever tactics, you sound kinda bitter "piracy" lol that's a dumb and obvious answer.
@user-yq1tf2jh9j5 ай бұрын
...indigenous to where? you do realise indigenous doesnt mean brown, right?
@1985donnelly Жыл бұрын
England isn't an island, other countries are on this island.
@vareckthehistoricaldemon1962 жыл бұрын
Great video but at 14:46 you got the Ottoman flag and mughal empire flag mixed up
@ethanmartell-md7xb3 ай бұрын
But if that’s the only inaccuracy you noticed then well you’re gonna need to start reading your history textbook again
@jonathang99832 жыл бұрын
I am English by birth. England is part of Great Britain. You spring from England to Britain in the same paragraph. This will confuse some and upset others.
@stanielsoncoochiesmellehsm61142 жыл бұрын
"The sun never sets on the british empire" I think its still happening since the UK still has overseas territories
@RobertK19932 жыл бұрын
In decli6many becoming independent.
@peterp40372 жыл бұрын
Fun part is it's a Spanish saying when they were an empire, the brits then took adopted it.
@macflod2 жыл бұрын
The Irish said this is because God didn’t trust what they would do if they were in the dark
@maxdavis77222 жыл бұрын
@@macflod the Irish didn’t say that lol.
@rosslamb66432 жыл бұрын
@@maxdavis7722 Who cares anyway Ireland could be taken just like that lol.
@yashdatir2 жыл бұрын
Nepal and Bhutan were also not colonized by British, also in India there were princely states those were independent however were diplomatically with British, technically they were not occupied...
@piyushjaiswal92832 жыл бұрын
@Jomon Francis not that the British defeated the Marathas. The sepoys of indo gangetic plains of up- Bihar won the other kingdoms for the British.
@LUNE.442 жыл бұрын
As a british person, my views on the empire are conflicted. Of course, the things that were done to the natives in these countries were horrible, and forcefully exploiting other nations' resources is wrong, but I do feel some pride to the fact that we had the biggest empire in history. I mean, come on, a tiny island in Europe managed to at one point control 25% of the land on Earth is absolutely mad
@tulipalll2 жыл бұрын
Especially considering how few resources were at your disposal. Absolutely incredible. And now look. English is the most important language in the world. By the way, we here in America are very thankful for English law! No English law, no constitution. Hopefully we will tend to that torch and pass it on to another when our time comes. Also don't forget. The brits were exactly 0% worse than any other conquerors. For God's sake, ghengis khan killed so many people that it cooled the planet.
@Futurus_YT2 жыл бұрын
As a British person I too am proud of the empire, due to britain bring so small.
@andersmortensen74152 жыл бұрын
Lol dont you forget they were known for being wussies and actually still is😄
@pilothat29142 жыл бұрын
Tiocfaidh ár lá
@Futurus_YT2 жыл бұрын
@@andersmortensen7415 doesnt change rhe fact Britain had the largest empire ever
@Amondera32102 жыл бұрын
Let's be honest, there "were" Psychopaths on the loose. And that was profitable that's why they're great. Sincerely, Alex
@skyler18872 жыл бұрын
"What a funny little island. I wonder what it used to do several years ago."
@pooroldman5089 Жыл бұрын
Eypgt fell off bro
@kushaladaora92912 жыл бұрын
Surprisingly, most of my fellow Filipinos do not know that the British Empire occupied Manila and Cavite for 2 years, from 1762 to 1764. The British was also responsible for Diego Silang's death after they promised him military assistance to support his revolt against Spain, which never happened. This also led to the death of Diego's wife, Gabriela Silang after she took the mantle of leadership after Diego's execution. The Brits invaded the Philippines after Spain decided to side with France during the Seven Years' War.
@XXXTENTAClON2272 жыл бұрын
It’s a small thing but the East India Company occupied Manila, not the British Empire. The British Empire left when they captured Spanish treasure, but the East India Company (which was separate to government and a “private” company) wanted their own compensation so they held Manila hostage until the British government kicked them out
@Glicksman12 жыл бұрын
Having the best navy by far for centuries may have had something to do with it, you think?
@user-hu8fn2jp5v2 жыл бұрын
Did you watch the video?
@armstrongreivers5224 Жыл бұрын
@stan down haha spamming this all over the comment section 🤣
@anenehough56732 жыл бұрын
I absolutely love your videos! Could You guys PLEASE, PLEASE!🙏 Make a video on the first and second Boer wars against Britain in South Africa... I would really Appreciate it.
@johndoeiii97672 жыл бұрын
Afrikaners were ✝️3®®0®®! $✝️$.
@adelolaadesanya8381Ай бұрын
@@johndoeiii9767 that’s cruel
@chrishughes-adair13192 жыл бұрын
Seemed to be phrased like the Americans abolished slavery. The abolition of slavery by Britain is one if the very few things any nation can claim as good.
@CIMAmotor Жыл бұрын
There were dozens of benefits to being a British colony.
@CarlosAlbertoUrrutia2 жыл бұрын
Guatemala claims Belize, so it can be argued it was invaded as well. Or had territory taken from it, no real combat happened.
@bassislandbannanas2 жыл бұрын
I swear it's like infographics has my world history lesson sometimes I just learned this yesterday
@gwho2 жыл бұрын
history classes can be removed from school curricula and be replaced with youtube.
@bassislandbannanas2 жыл бұрын
@@gwho yes
@At1ksh Жыл бұрын
"The sun never set on the British Empire because even God could not trust the Englishmen in the dark." - Shashi Tharoor
@sensibleshinchan10192 жыл бұрын
2 errors - 1) You kept showing the DRC as part of the British Empire, it was a Colony of Belgium 2) Britain took over India due to a rebellion in 1857
@rajanrairealty897910 ай бұрын
more then half india was sep state indep
@Imirainy Жыл бұрын
What an amazing video! It helped me understand a lot of information and to connect it :D Kind regards!
@shantatv3185 Жыл бұрын
It's just insane that a tiny country ruled the world and still has power today.
@Deltaish Жыл бұрын
Tiny? i wouldn't say UK is tiny, Their land is pretty large and they still have some of their colonies like Gibraltar, Falklands and inhabitable islands as well as the British Overseas dominions and British Virgin Islands.
@User98272-ue Жыл бұрын
@@Deltaishthey are tiny tho
@Deltaish Жыл бұрын
@@User98272-ue Yes but their overseas dominions or territories still have valuable resources to this day like Falkland Islands having oil.
@stevenjoy35372 жыл бұрын
England has always looked to the sea, and that's why Charles De Gaulle said we had more in common with Australia than France
@Someone-mt7mp2 жыл бұрын
I mean he’s right but that isn’t the reason why we are tighter with Aussies. The Aussie are cool, easy going and loyal whilst the French are arrogant, disloyal know it alls with an undeserved sense of entitlement.
@Installation04 Жыл бұрын
Has more to do with a shared language and history.
@macflod2 жыл бұрын
Got to correct this as it confuses England and Britain- England does NOT equal Britain. They are not the same thing. Britain is the island that contains 3 nations. England is one of those nations. England is not an island, its part of an island. The UK is Britain plus a 4th nation on the island of Ireland called Northern Ireland. These 4 nations are united to form one country we call the UK. Confusing these terms is like calling the USA California or calling Asia China.
@lucabrasi39642 жыл бұрын
Hate it when people refer to Britian as England
@jamesoakley45702 жыл бұрын
it is a little confusing for foreigners but it's not that hard to understand. England is a country, Great Britain is just the name of the island England is part off.
@lucabrasi39642 жыл бұрын
@@jamesoakley4570 it was Britian who created the empire not England. That's all you need to know
@lucabrasi39642 жыл бұрын
@@jamesoakley4570 technically it is the island but when people say british or britian they mean the United kingdom same as when people say America they mean the U.S
@macflod2 жыл бұрын
@@jamesoakley4570 yeah thats why i wanted to comment with the correction. This mistake is made a lot.
@Stevie86542 жыл бұрын
Greatest thing that ever happened. Spread civilization to most of the world.
@Ranxerox1911A12 жыл бұрын
Interesting how no one ever mentions who SOLD African humans to European humans. If a "commodity" isn't for sale, it is never purchased. Think about it.
@janabana73012 жыл бұрын
I don’t think it was mentioned because it’s not really relevant to the topic. The video is about how England conquered so much of the world and it was partly because they had access to humans that they could quite literally work to death. The act of buying enslaved people alone didn’t build England. It was how hard they worked them to gain maximum profits
@Jason-hg1pc2 жыл бұрын
Interesting how no one ever mentions the "freedom-seekers" who denied their slaves marriage by choice but bred them believing their children were therefore a profit against the losses inflicted from working the parents to death. Pray about it.
@bigenglishmonkey2 жыл бұрын
@@janabana7301 i think its more the fact that he said Europeans invaded parts of Africa for slaves when in fact by the time the invasions he was talking about happened Europeans had fully abolished slavery 30 to 50 years before
@dinonuggys64172 жыл бұрын
I just tested positive for Covid and im planning to have a 5-day infographics binge
@nathanvorobyov20582 жыл бұрын
If your having problems breathing already the best thing to do is lay down and just breath
@Phoenix-td9mj2 жыл бұрын
Hey @The Infographics Show Would the U.S. be able to sustain and survive if they got completely isolated from the rest of the world?
@mishham63882 жыл бұрын
Their own natural resources and crops. Also the Frenchies helped a bit haha this is why Australia never left the Commonwealth because we were always reliant on england for certain things we couldn't produce down under because of climate and soil conditions
@tulipalll2 жыл бұрын
Yes, they would. Geopolitical strategist Peter zeihan talks about this. They would not exist as they do now, but they could survive. They have the largest contiguous piece of arable farmland in the world. The Midwest is insane from a food production standpoint. They can feed the entire country with surplus if allowed to do so.
@azules97802 жыл бұрын
When I think about it, I can't see any reason that we couldn't. We're very blessed with natural resources of just about every kind plus we have the manufacturing and technological capability to sustain and continue progressing as well. Sure, we'd lose some things that we import but they aren't necessities, they're just bonuses to living here. Now if we were completely cut off, sure it'd be a rough 10 years as we struggled to rebuild industries that have long since left and find solutions for the few things that we don't naturally have but we do have the know how to do that with no issue. In some ways, I think it would be better if we went back to pre WW2.
@azules97802 жыл бұрын
When I think about it, I can't see any reason that we couldn't. We're very blessed with natural resources of just about every kind plus we have the manufacturing and technological capability to sustain and continue progressing as well. Sure, we'd lose some things that we import but they aren't necessities, they're just bonuses to living here. Now if we were completely cut off, sure it'd be a rough 10 years as we struggled to rebuild industries that have long since left and find solutions for the few things that we don't naturally have but we do have the know how to do that with no issue. In some ways, I think it would be better if we went back to pre WW2.
@a8-bit_gamer072 жыл бұрын
No, huge food shortage, but, the obesity stereotype may fade
@bogdancondicaru78482 жыл бұрын
Was Romania, then split into 3 principalities(Transilvania -part of Habsburgic empire at some point, Wallachia and Moldavia-servient to ottoman empire, but not officially part of it) also invaded? If yes, I'm curious to learn about it
@ducadaniel77572 жыл бұрын
I think the only time Britain soldiers invaded Romanian land was for a brief moment in WW2 when Romania was part of the Axis.
@bogdancondicaru78482 жыл бұрын
@@ducadaniel7757 i was thinking the same🤔 Any leads as to where should I start my research? Cheers
@eeeccc35622 жыл бұрын
No, we were not under British occupation.
@nicktk2 жыл бұрын
@@ducadaniel7757 not even then , 2 or 3 times aerial bombardment in WW2 doesnt count as occupation .. lel :)
@nathanseper87382 жыл бұрын
"If two fish are fighting in a river an Englishman must have passed by."
@paddington16702 жыл бұрын
If the fish are shooting each other it must be in the USA
@michaelhall75462 жыл бұрын
@@paddington1670 your cops carry sticks 🤣
@joshuadale77272 жыл бұрын
@@michaelhall7546 nope they carry taser guns pepper spray and of its reported someone has any sort of weapon we have lots of gun squads they are just normal police with guns. Thing is we don't need guns as often because it's not often someone else has a gun or even a knife big enough that a taser won't work
@nathanseper87382 жыл бұрын
@@paddington1670 Murica! Freedom!
@Finnbobjimbob2 ай бұрын
@@michaelhall7546You say that like it’s a bad thing
@terryharding89432 жыл бұрын
It's insane how powerful they used to be compared to now
@Potatoalex5382 жыл бұрын
They were not powerful they were more intelligent and advanced enough than the rest of the world's population. Like indian king army had no gun to fight but British army did. Advancement was there in British army
@michaelhall75462 жыл бұрын
@@Potatoalex538 don't know about that son 😮
@dononeeye99122 жыл бұрын
@@michaelhall7546 well he's kind of on the right track
@Hilts9312 жыл бұрын
@@Potatoalex538 they did have guns, they didn’t have the logistics, the training or the strategy
@Potatoalex5382 жыл бұрын
@@Hilts931 it's not like Britishers direct came in any country like India and start attacking them. With no plans strategy and enemy's power. They stayed there knew the place and then they did what they did like a coward
@SIR_STuBz2 жыл бұрын
I feel that a meme thespiffingbrit had relates to this "3 Questions one must not ask" "A males weight" "A females age" "How did the British museum get those aritfacts And relics?"
@terryhayward79052 жыл бұрын
A lot of the artifacts in the museums were saved from destruction. For instance, the Elgin marbles were being smashed up as building material, as were a lot of statues from Egypt. It is still happening today.
@chillijoe8264 Жыл бұрын
it’s amazing when you take into account that England (not britain) is just a bit smaller than Alabama 🏴🏴🏴
@UltimatelyEverything5 ай бұрын
England is Britain since England and Scotland are what make Britain
@jermaineishmael72252 жыл бұрын
Really interesting video really insightfuI I would really want to see a detailed video into the psychology and the geology of Britain and British people which drove them to think this way as a Britsh Carribbean I really would want to know how it all came about from a mind set pov always amases me how such a small island controled so much of the world....
@andrewjones96902 жыл бұрын
same mindset that poisons our society today still. Private companies driven by greed, exploiting everyone for profit, governments let them get away with terrible acts with plausible deniability , so they could set up a colony, then tax the locals so they got a slice of profits and resources to further and fund its globalist agenda. in that regard not much has changed when it comes to big business/big pharma/ oil companies and banks.
@leicestergux Жыл бұрын
Cos we are 💪💪💪😎😎😎❤️❤️❤️🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧
@OldBaldWookiee Жыл бұрын
Rome - "im rome " Britain -"me too" United States - " me three"
@riomouris47672 жыл бұрын
I always thought the answer to this question was "Ships, and more ships" "So many ships we run out of trees".
@waisinglee15092 жыл бұрын
They imported trees from the Baltic region and from eastern Canada.
@aconsideredopinion7529 Жыл бұрын
The timber for the ships came from Ireland
@DontFearTheWolf6662 жыл бұрын
Other countries: We will go here Britain: MINE
@irealhuman70012 жыл бұрын
Everyone invaded each other unconquered the British we're just really good at it
@tulipalll2 жыл бұрын
Exactly 💯 The brits were no worse than any other conquerer. On the contrary, they were the very best 😂☕🧐🇬🇧
@realdavidjones16232 жыл бұрын
@@tulipalll That isnt a good thing to be proud of
@realdavidjones16232 жыл бұрын
"everyone" is an exaggeration, also they conquered from a point of "I need this place so I take it", others didn't really need it as much I think
@tulipalll2 жыл бұрын
@@realdavidjones1623 they could have done what ghengis Khan did and killed more people than Adolph and Stalin. So many that the planet cooled down. But they didn't. I would say that's better. 💯
@realdavidjones16232 жыл бұрын
@@tulipalll still not a good thing
@Sandyfaceroll2 жыл бұрын
I think there is something to the genetic make up of the British people, at least the people in this time period. Thinking about the attributes of Celts, Romans, Saxons (et al) vikings and Normans. I know the Normans were basically Vikings too but they were different due to organisation, logistics and resource. So, in the genetic make up you could argue efficient empire building, seafaring exploration and warfare are well coded and possibly amplified by being an island nation.
That's what I think it was too. They were stuck on an island and winter was coming so they went out to the world to secure resources. Survival of the fittest
@daquaviousbingleton9763 Жыл бұрын
No one has invaded england since so it’s still the same genetic makeup and that’s why I think there’s so much hooliganism and bad behaviour abroad from English people because now they can’t conquer everything they just act like they own it
@CIMAmotor Жыл бұрын
The British never had a Roman genetic make-up.
@wittymartin2 жыл бұрын
This explains why commodities are today still traded on the London Stock Exchange.
@mayanksingh93922 жыл бұрын
Never forget guys that the entire glory, influence, territory-control, power and might of the British Empire was destroyed by Prime Minister Anthony Eden in just 9 days.
@nikhilhadbe2712 жыл бұрын
Good thing
@mayanksingh93922 жыл бұрын
@@nikhilhadbe271 Do you even know Anthony Eden??? He was the Indian equivalent of P.M. Vishwanath Pratap Singh.
@maxdavis77222 жыл бұрын
What?
@mayanksingh93922 жыл бұрын
@@maxdavis7722 Well, you see, Prime Minister Anthony Eden mislead the British Parliament in the 1956 Suez Crisis, thus ending United Kingdom's role as a superpower in the later half of the 20th Century and the rest of the Cold War period.
@maxdavis77222 жыл бұрын
@@mayanksingh9392 the UK wasn’t going to keep its power it had already committed to slowing self rule and disassembling the empire. The suez crisis only showed the facts that britain wasn’t a superpower anymore.
@Michael.1312 жыл бұрын
Love the fact how they skim over the fact GB was one of the first Empire's to ban slavery
@gwho2 жыл бұрын
and that conquest and mistreatment of the conquered was the norm all throughout history. because "white man bad"
@valeriedavidson27852 жыл бұрын
Gt Britain was the first country in the world to ban slavery. They also sent ships around the world to force all other countries to stop slavery. They deserve great credit for that.
@eeeccc35622 жыл бұрын
Yeah, it doesn t help the narrative of "white man bad".
@bandolivin35382 жыл бұрын
@@valeriedavidson2785 they wasnt so stop lying
@valeriedavidson27852 жыл бұрын
@@bandolivin3538 I am not lying. Britain stopped slavery around the world. They were the first to ban slavery and then forced other countries to do it. Check it out.
@kobet73412 жыл бұрын
We are the British army and we're here to take your land
@NarwahlGaming2 жыл бұрын
Native Chief: _"Oh. No thank you."_
@ultimapower69502 жыл бұрын
You can have it that is if you SCOR SUM FACKING GOALS
@matthewdelaney40782 жыл бұрын
Proud to be British 🇬🇧
@Snipsnop2602 жыл бұрын
We should be ashamed. Like come on we saw what the Nazis did and what Putin is doing right now. You shouldn't be proud of the British Empire or else you're condoning all the genocides and enslavement that was done. I for one am not proud and could never be proud.
@LyonHeart8882 жыл бұрын
@Jim Jam proud of global strong arm robbery? 🔥🤔🔥
@bh70902 жыл бұрын
@@LyonHeart888 average modern child using modern standards to judge a historical nation
@Suncat7702 жыл бұрын
u mean proud to be theif
@LyonHeart8882 жыл бұрын
@@bh7090 no, I’m pretty sure it was recognized as strong arm robbery back then too… by the victimized and the victimizer. 🔥🤷🏾♂️🔥
@robertb4000 Жыл бұрын
The British empire brings us into the modern era, this is how we have our own president/monarch
@stephenlawrence91302 жыл бұрын
England🏴 and Britain🇬🇧 are 2 different things, it's so annoying when Americans think that Brits and the English are the same thing🏴🏴🇮🇪🏴🇬🇧
@Persac72 жыл бұрын
What if he isnt american tho
@tulipalll2 жыл бұрын
@@Persac7 I mean the speaker has an American accent. But I guess he may not be the one doing the research and writing.
@graham49432 жыл бұрын
Ik as someone from Scotland and our history with England I hate that
@Englishsea242 жыл бұрын
Well it's simply because amongst all the inhabitants of this island, everyone likes to blame the English for all the bad things of the empire, when even the Welsh were involved to some degree. Henry Morgan is one example
@RobertK19932 жыл бұрын
Ireland🇮🇪 isn't and never has been British.
@shreejankhanal_2 жыл бұрын
No, Nepal was neither a British Colony nor a part of India at any time
@ryanjackson40042 жыл бұрын
A youtube channel that doesn't know anything not a surprise at all
@piyushjaiswal92832 жыл бұрын
Nepal has been part of Gupta Empire and maurya empire. Nepalis used to bow to bihari kings.
@shreejankhanal_2 жыл бұрын
@@piyushjaiswal9283 It's okay, Nepalis are better and we know it. Don't need to spit false information just like this youtube channel. smh 🤣
@laffey65462 жыл бұрын
Tbh best county about what other small island can do what we do exactly
@WhoBetterThanKanyon2 жыл бұрын
Best navy at the time ⚓️
@prajjwolbhattarai Жыл бұрын
You missed out Nepal. No country ever invaded Nepal, whatsoever.
@alitheonekhatarnak5163 Жыл бұрын
Nepal was defeated in anglo Nepalese war but not conquered
@barrythomson8992 жыл бұрын
England and Britain are not the same. They are not interchangeable. Many English people make the same mistake.
@1wun12 жыл бұрын
By fighting other empires you've theoretically invaded the vassals, but these stats are inflated.
@jasoncornthwaite8387 Жыл бұрын
which means what? or helps our evolution , point is bollx
@1wun1 Жыл бұрын
@@jasoncornthwaite8387 England never practically invaded 90% of the world.
@Superpooper-2020 Жыл бұрын
Invading weak empires and capturing villages
@jasoncornthwaite8387 Жыл бұрын
@@1wun1 true i suppose ,,, sorry about my comment ,, very interesting point
@jasoncornthwaite8387 Жыл бұрын
@@Superpooper-2020 well thats just evolution ,, we did it and now get judged my you modern folk in life,, trail and error ,,, survival of the fittest ,,, ect ect , but we few english folk from a very very small island ??? lol
@Mute0404042 жыл бұрын
It is excepted that slavery existed throughout history all over the world - it only becomes 'disgraceful' when Britain or Europeans do it. Capturing people & selling them as slaves to foreigners is ok though
@Alfie1 Жыл бұрын
people aways say black people have suffered the most but lets be honest take a look at what has happened to the jews in the las thousand years we need jew history month id kneel for that
@MagdaleneDivine2 жыл бұрын
It wasn't just African. It was India and China and native Americans... They just didn't call that slavery. They called it Capitalism.
@sammy29542 жыл бұрын
Yeah don’t worry a lot of things are off with this video.
@johndoeiii97672 жыл бұрын
Or "Spresding the Gospel" ie, saving the souls of heathens, savages.
@Mavity9934Ай бұрын
Where’s my dingy, on chilling 😂❤
@dyshexiia2 жыл бұрын
To sum it up or historically accurate reading “A MASSIVE FOOKIN INFERIORITY COMPLEX”
@Benni7772 жыл бұрын
One of my favorite lines from Hamilton: “Why should a tiny island across the sea regulate the price of tea?”
@gwho2 жыл бұрын
false framing. prices are set by market forces, and a certain concentration or geography may have outsized weight and say over it. or they're set by coercive power / monopoly, again, which isn't necessarily distributed evenly by geography or land size.
@Benni7772 жыл бұрын
@@gwho bro, it’s just a quote 😂😂
@sgtpepper6481 Жыл бұрын
@@Benni777 Yes and of course it was the extortionate tax rates the UK was charging (to fund the conflicts with the French and Spanish). Turns out it was an error of judgement in hindsight...... I am a proud Brit and have been to the Battle of Bunker Hill monument in Boston.
@ViceXXII2 жыл бұрын
I always forget that the queen is also the queen of canada until i hear it somewhere
@ChocoMilk.o_o2 жыл бұрын
She is also the queen of austrailia
@dylanmenzies397310 ай бұрын
The British navy under Elisabeth I was much smaller than the Spanish Amada. In part it succeeded because it was much better organised than the Spanish fleet, which suffered under consequences of Catholic dogma. This set the path for the future. Intelligence and independence.
@sfsoccerstar52 жыл бұрын
Britain, the number one provider of independence days
@shaunlink2802 жыл бұрын
*casually forgets the whole lost generation thing in australia*
@TheStickman4192 жыл бұрын
This video should be how England Scotland , Wales and Ireland invaded 90% the world. A lot of people tend to forget the role these other groups played in British colonization. The British did this, not just England alone
@poplops12 жыл бұрын
That's Americans for you, they often think that England, Britain and the UK are interchangeable terms.
@poplops12 жыл бұрын
@Critical Slayer The best British general, Arthur Wellesley, the Duke of Wellington, was Irish. He was even Prime Minister twice. The Irish definitely helped.
@paulohagan33092 жыл бұрын
@@poplops1 He was one of the Ascendency, a class of people who despised the Irish and called themselves British. He himself spent little time in Ireland and certainly did nothing for the place.
@Mute0404042 жыл бұрын
@Critical Slayer Ireland was as much part of Britain as Wales & Scotland till 100 years ago. Something that is often overlooked
@Mute0404042 жыл бұрын
@@paulohagan3309 The elites despised the working class, the world over.. The Duke was Irish born as was his father & grandfather, however this doesn't make him Irish? Mmm
@YorkshireMemes2 жыл бұрын
The thumbnail is way too conflicting with the title as Britain is not a country….it’s a union that Scotland made. Also Scotland and wales are British (since Scotland made Britain) so it’s awfully wrong to say Britain then in England in the video without including Scotland and wales
@Ccccc-mi3tr2 жыл бұрын
They always do it
@YorkshireMemes2 жыл бұрын
@@Ccccc-mi3tr it’s awful and misleading
@letsmathsdebate2942 жыл бұрын
Scotland were broke, England saved them
@YorkshireMemes2 жыл бұрын
@@letsmathsdebate294 I know us English saved the British…the English always saves the British tyrants
@samright46612 жыл бұрын
The Sun never set on the British Empire
@kansaiben1573 Жыл бұрын
"England was an island"??? Scotsman here - surely you know that Scotland is 1/3 of the British mainland?
@Y999922 жыл бұрын
I guess you can say Britain has traveled the world faster than a shockwave.
@blake75872 жыл бұрын
Most places Britain invaded & conquered ended up being better off. Yes it’s true that they encouraged America to practice slavery but now the descendants of those slaves & conquered people are far better off than if they had been left alone.