Thanks for the data! My NZ900 is coming this week, so I'll be setting it up with my Stewart Studiotek 130 G4 AT screen.
@Techthusiasm2 ай бұрын
Nice!
@reezepees252 ай бұрын
You will have a lot more light.. With the Stewart screen.
@sebna2 ай бұрын
Two quick comments. The light coming out of NZ900 is not laser light as such. Laser is used as energy source to energize phosphorus wheel which emits the light that we see. At least that is my understanding. So looking into beam could be dangerous, not sure how dangerous if at all, but if it is, it would not be because of laser light. Could you let us know based on what you suspect you can get permanent damage from looking into beam of projector (and how for how long etc.)? And the other thing is about light meters from Amazon. I have a RS calibrated light meter and my friend has amazon CN knockoff. The RS was twice as expensive. In low nit values they measure comparably (so close to closed iris), but the more the light the bigger the difference up to 30% at iris fully open (only about 50-60 nits in that case). My RS meter was (factory) calibrated few years ago so it might be that it has drifted that much but I would imagine that it might be that both are in accurate enough at this stage to lead to 30% difference in higher output light measurement. Would be interesting if you could compare one of your pre-calibration high output modes vs calibrators gear to see how close your meter is. Thanks
@Techthusiasm2 ай бұрын
The manual clearly says do not look into the lens for fear of serious bodily damage. I thought laser projector had extra precaution about this, but maybe it's just because it's just concentrated brightness. Interesting on the meters. We will see what Sammie measures with his pro gear.
@Rob_James2 ай бұрын
Considering ur screen size that projector is insanely bright def looking forward to calibration and seeing how it truly performs. 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
@Techthusiasm2 ай бұрын
Calibration will happen in about 3 weeks!
@Anakin-dl6ebАй бұрын
Name of the Lux meter??
@TechthusiasmАй бұрын
This one. amzn.to/3U5W4iX
@SealedOrPorted2 ай бұрын
Good information Jaremy. Looking forward to the calibration and results.
@Techthusiasm2 ай бұрын
Coming soon!
@jameshollingsworth68912 ай бұрын
Did I miss the part where we mentioned the screen type, size, aspect and gain if any and throw distance.
@Techthusiasm2 ай бұрын
I probably could have done better with that. :) I did mention some of it. Screen is a 2.35:1 Seymour with Center Stage XD material. It's 163" diagonal (150" wide). Throw distance is like 18' and viewing distance is like 13'.
@jameshollingsworth68912 ай бұрын
@@Techthusiasm Thank you! Keep up the great work!
@HighStrid3r2 ай бұрын
Can you do this on vivid picture mode, full laser and open? I believe on vivid it will output more nits
@coreymarotta2 ай бұрын
Great run-though, appreciate the attention to detail and methodical interaction with the light options 🤙🏻
@Techthusiasm2 ай бұрын
Thanks! 👍
@francismedina45472 ай бұрын
Nice review of your NZ900. How do your nits & lux measurements translate to lumens? I know that you'll be using anamorphic soon but how are the lens memories? Are they spot on?
@Techthusiasm2 ай бұрын
I believe that calculation is LUX / 10.76 x screen square footage, which should put me right under 2,000. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong. :) Lens movement seems fine. I have not set or recalled lens memories since I already had the madVR.
@we84632 ай бұрын
Does this projector needs to be calibrated?
@Techthusiasm2 ай бұрын
Picture is quite good out of the box. We'll see what impact a full calibration has.
@waleedmj2 ай бұрын
Thank you for this interested video. I wish in your next video with new lens you show us how to install your lens step by step guide because there is no single video in KZbin showing how to do that specially zoom in and out with lens on Because I had issue with mine without lens I can easily fill the screen but with it on is hard Thank you so much.
@Techthusiasm2 ай бұрын
The lens arrived today. Content coming soon!
@waleedmj2 ай бұрын
@@Techthusiasm Thank you I hope you enjoy it.
@mrlinde65182 ай бұрын
How large is the screen?
@Techthusiasm2 ай бұрын
163" diagonal 2.35:1.
@mrlinde65182 ай бұрын
@@Techthusiasm ok depending on actual gain you're getting around 2900+- lumens? My NZ9 calibrated sits around 2750+-
@FrankieKennethL2 ай бұрын
Great video and great to see measurements like this. The XD material has been third party measured to be at about .85/.90 gain. Also, if you want an idea for a part 2, you should do an SPL measurement of the fan noise at different lazer settings. Measure both at the unit and at the MLP. that would be nice to see
@Techthusiasm2 ай бұрын
Thanks! Yeah, I was thinking of a noise test too. 👍
@davemccague2222 ай бұрын
Hi Jeremy, great video. I purchased jvc nz7 last year and I’m pretty happy with it. I am considering a Panamorph lens in the future and I’m looking forward to your set up and hopefully review of the unit. I’m so jealous about your 900 lol.
@Techthusiasm2 ай бұрын
The lens was delivered now. Content and setup to come. If you're interested in one, I can sell those now, FYI.
@we84632 ай бұрын
Panamorph is so expensive especially after paying so much for a projector $26,000 the price of a Toyota!
@Techthusiasm2 ай бұрын
Yeah, this is an expensive level of equipment for sure.
@erod90882 ай бұрын
Don't most set the laser to mid, which is about 55%?
@Techthusiasm2 ай бұрын
I think it's just a matter of taste and system logistics.
@sammy100012 ай бұрын
I dont think its all that impressive... Why is the jvc and sony still in the low 3000s lumens when epson went all way upto 10k.
@Techthusiasm2 ай бұрын
Hopefully Epson forces pressure on JVC and Sony for the next generations.
@erod90882 ай бұрын
@@sammy10001 Epson blacks are a light gray. Yuck.
@sammy100012 ай бұрын
@@erod9088 masking fixes that issue, in non 16:9 content.
@TechinaSec1012 ай бұрын
@@erod9088 If you have masking, the benefits of higher light output will be MUCH better then the extra " Blacks " of the JVC.
@erod90882 ай бұрын
@@TechinaSec101 That makes zero sense. JVCs destroy Epson in picture quality. That's not debatable by any measure.