Hewitt had a 10-9 head to head against Agassi/Sampras combined. He was beating them as a teenager and they weren't even that old. They were still in their 20s for the most part. I know a lot of fans on the internet only started watching tennis after the big 3 came along but this guy was a warrior and a rare talent and deserves respect. I think Aussies for the most part would know but others may not realise how many injuries and surgeries this guy had on his foot and hip during his mid-20s. At one stage he consulted 7 surgeons about an issue with his toe, had to put screws and a plate in it and even burned the nerve endings to stop the pain. None of that worked so he had to get the toe fused together and was told he would never play tennis again. He did and got to finish his career on his own terms, even beating Federer in his last match against him. Just because he doesn't have 20 Grand Slams doesn't mean wasn't a great champion, there were amazing players before the big 3 and there will be afterwards too.
@imalwaysright10 ай бұрын
🙌🏻🙌🏻🙌🏻
@AGAU102210 ай бұрын
100% tennis knowledge
@blucat410 ай бұрын
Exactly. About Hewitt, Federer said: "He was the one that really started it all. He was the one that showed us how to do it." I think Fed was talking about the mental game, not anything technical.
@cybernetennis10 ай бұрын
Fun fact; Hewitt is like 10 years younger than Agassi but Agassi won a grand slam more recently hehe
@blucat410 ай бұрын
@@cybernetennis Fun fact: Hewitt won their first ever meeting when he was only 16, he he
@Wilantonjakov10 ай бұрын
That last point is my favourite point ever. That shot of Federer smiling as he was running down the last ball... at that moment it was more than just a competition. Both players loved the game and had captured the spirit of it. Beautiful to watch.
@scottysmediaproductions10 ай бұрын
Definitely a GOAT point for sure!
@WBFbySteefen10 ай бұрын
Gave me CHILLS!
@duasympara75959 ай бұрын
That look Roger gives Hewitt after the point too, respect.
@jeresosa974410 ай бұрын
Lleyton was the transition between the 90´s and the modern game. The determination to win, court coverage and counter attacking tennis was new in the game, back in the day. Lacking the consistence trough the whole season, but winning enough points to finish N1 two years in a row, he was a legend. His hip, besides Federer´s new era, marked the end of his peak-game. He brought to the game the "c´mon!!" with the swedish gesture "the vight". His trademark. Nor Federer, Djokovic, Alcaraz or whoever could yell c´mon like Lleyton used to. You could love him or hate him, but never went unnoticed. He didnt have to "create" a personality to be marketeable like many top players, he was like that since forever.
@zeddeka10 ай бұрын
I remember someone saying that one of the reasons so many players found him so difficult was because of the three quarters type of pace he often hit at. It wasn't hard enough to rebound the pace back at him, and not soft enough to take advantage of, and it wrecked a lot of players' timing because they were so used to heavier pace coming at them. It took the players a while to figure him out - notably Roger Federer, who lost 7 of his first 9 matches against Hewitt.
@bluebird240110 ай бұрын
There were and are other players using the same strategy: Gilles Simon, Andy Murray and in more recent years Daniil Medvedev. It often looks a bit like cheating :-p as it is a low risk thing to do with high reward. But then again, if it is easier to do, then why doesn't everyone do it? ;-)
@NamTran-xc2ip10 ай бұрын
Federer was losing to everybody though, he had more 1R exits than QF before peaking.
@pontusschroder836110 ай бұрын
Very interesting! thanks👍
@jonbonesmahomes747210 ай бұрын
It didnt take time for Fed to figure Hewitt out,it had nothing to do with that. Fed was mentally weak in his early days ,also his game wasnt developed enough. Once he got to his level,he wooped Hewitt's a$$ regularly. Slam final.60 76 60
@TheseHoesAreLoyal10 ай бұрын
@@bluebird2401you are right about everything except Andy Murray.
@doctornov710 ай бұрын
Hewitt pioneered the game modern game by sliding consistently on hard courts. The kind of sliding we see today has its origins in Hewitt's early days.
@SonateSonate10 ай бұрын
Yes, him and Clijsters.
@arisadriano15449 ай бұрын
it was also Paradorn Schrichapan who did a lot of sliding similar to what Djokovic does now.
@sspacegghost4 ай бұрын
and chang...he was a slider. chang and hewitt had similar guts. the hewitt lob is the most under rated shot in tennis - that thing he would pull out of nowhere and make players look stupid...
@mikthe200410 ай бұрын
Imagine Lleyton Hewitt's dedication and never say die attitude in Nick Kyrgios!! Now, THAT would be a formidable player!!
@sltga125410 ай бұрын
Nick Kyrgios is an arrogant prick who has never won a singles grand slam thinking he’s all that and this is coming from an Aussie.
@wallacegrommet934310 ай бұрын
His backhand was his weapon. It did all the heavy lifting. He did everything possible with that backhand. Lob, chip, drive, drop shot, volley. Took the ball early or late. Spin or flat. You name it.
@craigerickson403710 ай бұрын
Thank you 👍. Someone who gets it. They act like ball " pace" is the be all end all weapon. Layton was a wall with all the backhand qualities you said. Plus fitness and a tad crazy .
@speedypete498710 ай бұрын
everything except the down the line backhand winner, so he became predictable on the backhand side. Reliable but predictable.
@ProbablyLying10 ай бұрын
What an athlete! And very clever and highly skilled. Most of all, he played with the heart of a lion. I am happy to have finally seen a glimpse of Leyton’s career. Count me as a fan!
@tdc_202110 ай бұрын
That last point was absolutely insane
@warriorson797910 ай бұрын
He was the original "fast Aussie" even before De Minaur was born...😌😏
@starllama21499 ай бұрын
That's kinda disingenuous to Hewitt by just referring to him as a "fast Aussie". He was dominant in the early 2000s, way more successful than De Minaur has ever been.
@warriorson79799 ай бұрын
@@starllama2149 Exactly.
@thb109110 ай бұрын
One of the most impactful players ever. He was the first player who had both the returning and the court coverage to counter serve & volley. Sampras saw the writing on the wall at the 2001 USO.
@joed872310 ай бұрын
That last point v Federer is possibly the best point I've ever seen after 30+ years of watching tennis.
@imalwaysright10 ай бұрын
Perfect way to close out this compilation 👏🏻👏🏻
@whatevs170010 ай бұрын
That last point was one of the best ever..
@rjamesyork10 ай бұрын
He doesn’t get enough credit for how clean a hitter he was. He was fast, obviously, but there were other guys of comparable speed. They couldn’t effortlessly redirect pace or consistently thread passing shots on the full run, though.
@SpeechNerd9 ай бұрын
One of the biggest cheat codes hewitt used was standing up on or inside the baseline cutting out the time the bug hitters had to react and swing through. Keeping them off balance with shorter backswing. Basically the De minaur game you see today.
@doctornov710 ай бұрын
I've been on a prime Hewitt binge recently, so this is perfect.
@blucat410 ай бұрын
@HardCandy-fd4vz Like a B-Grade chinese copy! 😄
@doctornov710 ай бұрын
I respect the class and maturity De Minuar has shown over the past year and believe he will have a very good season. @HardCandy-fd4vz
@MgoUmk10 ай бұрын
13:23 i dont think i ever see that federer smiling camera of the point before! good stuff
@arisadriano15449 ай бұрын
federer knew the point was over because he fell into hewitt’s trap. it’s a salute to hewitt’s never say die attidude.
@cormorant_on_arock793410 ай бұрын
Lleyton Hewitt was always one of my favorites. I love his big time celebration - and when the Australian commentators go: "Ah yeahhh! And Lleyton's got the lawn-mowa going!"
@fabianhauser70810 ай бұрын
Youngest prime ever. Peaked with 21(when many players are still on the rise) and then faded away. Capitalized best in the phase between prime Pete and prime big 3 eras.
@imalwaysright10 ай бұрын
He had a lot of injuries
@alexdamonwrites10 ай бұрын
Lleyton Hewitt is an absolute champion of the game and more than deserves his place in the Hall of Fame. His speed on court matched the sharpness of his mind, knowing when to hold back and when to go on the attack. As demonstrated in this video, Hewitt possessed an unbelievable ability to propel himself to every ball, which meant players had to work hard to get him off balance. Unfortunately, like a lot of injury-prone players, Hewitt was robbed of what should have been his peak, but even then, I think his accomplishments at the turn of the century, being the youngest number 1 of all time (until Alcaraz), his mental fortitude and longevity despite a torrid run of injuries, I would say he's somewhere in the 20 to 30 bracket on the all-time list. He'd be ahead of many of his contemporaries at the time, including Kuerten, Roddick and Safin (arguably, given he also experienced a bad run of injuries that, like Hewitt, prevented him from achieving any more than he did).
@thepsychologist815910 ай бұрын
What 'robbed' Hewitt was his inability to change his game. It didn't take long for other players to work him out and once they did, he was on a downward trajectory.
@TheJadedFilmMaker10 ай бұрын
I remember!! as a fan it was hard to watch towards the end. kept yelling at the TV for the last 5 years of his career. was enjoyable tho! (my main crit was he kept going 'back behind' just too much until the advantage was no longer there, then finally he'd go cross court the other way, all the players were on to him )
@jncn125 ай бұрын
one of my favorite players. He was relentless in getting every ball back as a counter-pusher. Also his serve form is picturesque. Look it up.
@jncn125 ай бұрын
played with the rdx and rds because of this guy
@nhatlongvu889610 ай бұрын
Right before Federer's era began, Hewitt came around and surely made his mark👍It's suck that injuries ruined his career, but still, you can't deny the fact that he is an amazing player: he managed to win 2 Slams, 2 ATP Finals, 1 Master and remained the Youngest World No.1 for 20 years (up until Alcaraz broke this record in 2022)⭐
@TheseHoesAreLoyal10 ай бұрын
He's very underrated. I'm a big fan of his game, it's clean and the counterpunching always entertains me
@imalwaysright10 ай бұрын
*2 masters, both Indian Wells. Also Top 10 most weeks at #1
@azharfarooq11414 ай бұрын
I still love him as player no one can touch his dignity tje one and only llyten Hewitt ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
@Nleezie332 күн бұрын
One of my ALL TIME favorites 🎉😊 🎾
@den20dgo9 ай бұрын
My all time favorite player and the original "come on"!
@geoffthomson168610 ай бұрын
That last rally was amazing :)
@warriorson797910 ай бұрын
Hewitt and Murray the only 2 guys who could consistently hit lob winners...🤔
@lucianogonzalez859710 ай бұрын
Nalbandian too
@SeanT64910 ай бұрын
Agassi
@ps-bi2sr10 ай бұрын
The Aussies and Brits with their TS lobs....killer!
@dustyroot470810 ай бұрын
But, only Murray can do the grunting lob.
@thytoe10 ай бұрын
De Minaur's lobs are quite good too
@BarbiePerret10 ай бұрын
Tackling complex subjects with such finesse; it's an intellectual delight.😚
@zacharyhoulihan215910 ай бұрын
Where are the Rio quarterfinal highlights?
@speedypete498710 ай бұрын
Hewitt had it all deep, reliable ground strokes from the back of the court, superb volleys, an incredible lob, inside out forehand, cross court forehand and a warrior's spirit that never gave in. Everything that is except a down the line backhand. Once people realised that he lacked that shot (i.e. every backhand was going to go crosscourt) was predictable and became beatable.
@Fekalmatta10 ай бұрын
He had a never say die attitude. If he were down 6-0, 5-0, 40-0, he'd still be chasing down every ball like his life depended on it.
@jacobpaint9 ай бұрын
The period between the Sampras era and Federa then Nadal then Djoker was the Hewitt era. Most people don’t seem to remember that. He certainly had some talent to be #1 for so long in that period but his tenacity and ability to win from 0-2 down was his most impressive attribute. This highlight reel is filled with long points where he scrambled for everything until he finally wore the other player down. It might be said that the competition was in a bit of a glut after Sampras retired and before Fed hit his straps but credit should be given to little Lleyton, he was an impressive player.
@aldodenigris35102 ай бұрын
The point from 11:47 is "the ice on a cake", 45 rally shots....Hewitt had a DEFENCE,,, pffff at the best.
@ViknDilln10 ай бұрын
He's in the top 10 greatest male tennis players of all time.
@AdeptMarsupial9 ай бұрын
Roger's probably still breathing heavy from that final rally. Prime Hewitt was the man
@MMM1809210 ай бұрын
I like Hewitt but this is an era of tennis I do NOT miss.
@jimmyaudiophreak167110 ай бұрын
He was good but he peaked at the end of he Sampras era and before Federer got going on his run from 2003. As Sampras wrote in his book, Hewitt saw his window of opportunity and he took full advantage of it from 2000-20005. Great player but after his 2005 Aus Open loss to Safin, th game had passed him by as it does everyone. But, a fabulous career and a helluva gusty player. Fed admitted they all hated to see Hewitt show up in he draw because he was so dogged and mentally tough
@bhavaniprakash21668 ай бұрын
He was quick in court
@cristianosimoes194610 ай бұрын
O último ponto com o Federer rindo antes dele terminar é uma pérola do tênis ❤
@JerrycurlGee3310 ай бұрын
Prime Hewitt was a beast! The original Mighty Mouse who made the most out of his incredible talent. That last point vs. Federer was trademark Lleyton.
@YoutubeKonto-d5r9 ай бұрын
Hewitt showed to the world that you don't need to be serv-volleyer to be successful in grass and in faster hardcourts. That even full baseliner can win on those courts.
@Sebastian-wz1wh10 ай бұрын
A career overshadowed by federer
@THADeeUSS9 ай бұрын
😅 didn’t even know this guy was Aussie for ages . Grew up watching him . Only realised he was Aus when he versed prime Federer
@crae_zi45439 ай бұрын
why does the game look so slow back then? Is it the camera quality that gives that effect? Because they're striking looks really soft. Still incredible player, especially movement wise. I was just curious if the game changed that much since then or it's just a camera thing
@carlkligerman198110 ай бұрын
Anybody that could make Roger grunt, even once, let alone sweat (!) was bone fide. Hewitt’s point construction was something else when he was at the top of his game.
@levelsetgo533110 ай бұрын
Last point still the greatest of all time
@precessionoftheequinoxes322410 ай бұрын
Hewitt will always be one of the greatest Australian 🎾 tennis players. Come On!!!
@thepsychologist815910 ай бұрын
And according to that idiot Kyrgios, he will always be the best (albeit, without ever achieving anything significant).
@user-wd7ue1wd6r10 ай бұрын
he was a light weight champion who had his moments but once heavy weights like roger rafa novak showed up, he faded quick. But lots of respect for maximizing the early 2000s (post pete sampras prime era and old agassi)
@gregoryphillips396910 ай бұрын
But Federer took his lumps early on against Hewitt. It wasn't automatic by any means. Federer had to physically mature and raise his game. All the way through you were in a fight against Hewitt. All victories against him were earned. Unless l am mistaken and could be Hewitt even had success against a prime John Isner who consistently was serving bombs all over the place. Hewitt was great, he earned everything he got.
@imalwaysright10 ай бұрын
But he had a good record against early Roger. Someone in the comments said it was 7-2 in their first encounters
@lotus63010 ай бұрын
incredible how much racquet and string technology improved over the years almost looks like a different sport 20 years ago
@BLACKTREAT10 ай бұрын
Shut up
@alemagjoh10 ай бұрын
quality of match video recordings as well. 60fps very smooth
@pascalb.712610 ай бұрын
I don t know what happened to him after 2005, 2006 was the beginning of his funeral. Since then he was not the same anymore.
@isthatrubble10 ай бұрын
that's the point he started to have a lot of injury issues
@t-bone798810 ай бұрын
He played in the real best era of tennis just before prime fed
@dynamokiev588610 ай бұрын
Los momentos de Rio??
@robertgenuario34355 ай бұрын
Fed has his #
@iceman112510 ай бұрын
his backhand changed later years.
@sebastianolmos22710 ай бұрын
Gastón Gaudio once said: “I don’t know how Hewitt reached number 1. His game was extremely slow, his ball didn’t have power. He returned everything, yes, but his game didn’t damage me at all”
@Ushgulubululum10 ай бұрын
Gaudio probably still can't get past this point, which starts at 10:44. Hewitt is one of the greatest in tennis and has achieved much more than Gaudio. Hewitt lives rent-free in his head
@dartinmo662110 ай бұрын
is this the same clay court specialist Gaudio who lost to Hewitt, a fast court specialist, on clay and has never beaten Hewitt on any surface aside from clay?
@sebastianolmos22710 ай бұрын
@@Ushgulubululum Gaudio's statement has some logic if you watch that point. He attacked him, moved him all over the court and still lost the point due to Hewitt's superpower skills when it came to running.
@TheseHoesAreLoyal10 ай бұрын
Gaston Gaudio is one of my least favorite players. Guillermo Coria should have won that RG final against him in 2004, way more talented than Gaston and Coria had way higher winning percentage than Gaudio going into that RG 2004 final
@NN-zf7np10 ай бұрын
@Saibot198 the point shows exactly why Hewitt became a grandslam champion and world #1 while Gaudio didn't. Hewitt brought the fight every match and intrinsically had respect for his opponents' skills despite what he showed on the court sometimes. Hence he always believed in working to his limit and beyond. Gaudio was more talented however didn't respect the game or was rarely ready to fight when things weren't smooth sailing. He could have easily put away the smash, but he wanted to disrespect Hewitt. He didn't respect the game or his opponent enough. Ultimately, he paid the price. Hewitt worked super hard to stay in the point and was ready to push more; rightfully winning the point at the end.
@tomace489810 ай бұрын
In the era of Sampras/Agassi, you just really disliked this guy. That's how you know he was a world-class player.
@peterberg921910 ай бұрын
He would have been top 30 today.
@simonskoczek246810 ай бұрын
And you can say that about all eras. Irrelevant comment and no true knowledge.
@seanxi10 ай бұрын
few friends n I used to call him the Austrian wild rabbit.
@gianlucasarti813910 ай бұрын
Rio QF highlights?????????
@George17-8710 ай бұрын
Hewitt found that small gap between the previous greats and then the rise of Federer. Once Fed got in the scene he would usually beat Hewitt at least 1 set 6-0 just to work on his bagels.
@robatkinson212510 ай бұрын
Its his birthday today
@dynamokiev588610 ай бұрын
Alcaraz vibes?
@pagenial10 ай бұрын
Lleyton is the one who has benefited the most from the transition between Sampras-Agassi of the 90's and the modern period of the big four (Federer, Nadal, Djokovic, Murray). Modern tennis is characterized by an evolution of the material with the generalization of the "poly" strings and the slowing down of surfaces giving a big advantage to baseliners. Therefore big servers like Sampras, Ivanisevic, Roddick were clearly at a disadvantage in favor of the baseliners like Agassi, Nalbandian, Baghdatis, and then Hewitt. Indeed from the beginning of the 2000's the surface of the tennis courts, including grass, became much slower. Indeed I grew up in the 90's watching attacking player such as Edberg, Becker, Stich, Sampras, Ivanisavic, Forget, old McEnroe in Wimbledon. But in 2002, the Hewitt-Nalbandian Wimbledon final really frustrated me: no one took to the net but instead relied on unusally longer rallies... Moreover, during the same transition period Hewitt, with his fighting spirit, also took advantage of the mental fragility of Marat Safin, Marcelo Rios and until 2003 of Federer. Hewitt had the merit of winning in a period when apart from Kuerten, Safin, Costa, Ferrero, and Kafelnikov, the list of Grand Slam tournament winners was made up of either surprise winners such as Thomas Johansson or older "post prime" players such as Petr Korda, Agassi, Ivanisevic, Sampras.... His style of play was a precursor to the style of Murray and of course especially Djokovic, who is now the archetype of the modern player and therefore the most accomplished specimen to date.. until Sinner, Rune and Alcaraz will push the level even further up... But obviously Hewitt style of play was not ergonomic enough to save his body from injuries. He probably lacked the ability to continuously adapt his game. Fon instance the following generations of top players such as Federer, Nadal and Djokovic has in an unprecedented way continually evolved their game and weaknesses: Federer's made a lot of progresses optimizing his footwork and backhand during his career, Nadal improved his backhand, serve and netgame, today Djokovic has the most impredictable serve and the best forehand in the game...
@azharfarooq11414 ай бұрын
His career was destroyed by roger federer when he was in unexplained forum later rafael nadal did the same to roger Federer in any case hewitt moya and nadal all are legends ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
@24ghosh249 ай бұрын
Hewitt Just good enough to win 1 slam, Safin was unique.
@patrioticindia8 ай бұрын
He has won three grandslams …
@24ghosh248 ай бұрын
@@patrioticindia only2 actually
@barnabyvonrudal1Ай бұрын
I remember when Hewitt was better than Federer. I didn't think Federer was going to beat him...
@kuab131310 ай бұрын
He was a better Radwanska version. A product of weak era, he fitted nicely between prime Sampras/Agassi and prime Federer.
@BetzeRetro10 ай бұрын
FIGHTER 💪
@Official.tadiwa10 ай бұрын
He was the Novak before Novak
@jacobpaint9 ай бұрын
It seems like this channel misses an opportunity to make videos like this much more engaging by simply adding some titles with progressive stats. Showing a collection of clips only gives a very vague answer to the video title, “how good was Lleyton Hewitt?”. Titles showing very easy to find information like a tally of his wins, interesting records/stats and other things would make the videos something people would seek out rather than just something they might click on if it appears in their feed.
@luvee81132 ай бұрын
Imagine if he had a forehand...
@kenray320510 ай бұрын
I want to play like Roger glide through the court.
@domagojhrgovic741910 ай бұрын
I started watching tennis when Hewitt was breaking through and he was better than Federer at that time.
@Derlei10 ай бұрын
If not for Federer Hewitt would have been the greatest of his generation and a probable GOAT. Remember, he was world no.1 before Federer
@rjamesyork10 ай бұрын
No way he would’ve had the longevity to be GOAT. His results were becoming erratic by 2003.
@gregorsamsa55510 ай бұрын
@@rjamesyork Yep, Safin beat him pretty easy in 2005 AO final, I thought Hewitt will get that title, but crazy Russian was of 🔥those 2 weeks
@anseinueseima4088 ай бұрын
Even the Tennis TV officials cannot witness more of Djokovic fans' stupid saying of weak era, that they decided to upload this.
@MaryLee-r2v2 ай бұрын
Price Street
@RonnieClark-h1z3 ай бұрын
Payton Squares
@stoolpigeon428510 ай бұрын
Good enough to not bother showing his Wimbledon title apparently?
@blucat410 ай бұрын
This channel can't show the slams, hence no footage from Wimbledon or the US Open, or the Australian Open where he beat Nadal on the way to the final.
@t-bone798810 ай бұрын
Wonder why he had so many injuries? All that running...?
@masters.100010 ай бұрын
He was amazing until the injuries plagued him. The first N1 to play the modern baseline game.
@AlanRR12110 ай бұрын
When was his injuries?
@masters.100010 ай бұрын
@@AlanRR121 2006. By 2008 he added a hip surgery which basically ended him.
@acsmith81810 ай бұрын
Surely that was Andre Agassi
@simonskoczek246810 ай бұрын
@@AlanRR121huge problems with hip and feet.
@Saskobest10 ай бұрын
The Murray from the early 2000s, i think he achieved almost his full potential, maybe injuries cost him anothers slam or masters title but overall i think Fed, Roddick, Safin and later Novak/Rafa/Murray were more talented than him
@pitchkapizda835510 ай бұрын
I’d like to see how he would go in this era if he was in his prime bet be a different story
@mavisser321110 ай бұрын
masipa bens?
@rl_danny10 ай бұрын
Pretty good...
@arisadriano15449 ай бұрын
been watching tennis since the 90s. i always say to younger fans that a prime lleyton hewitt will give djokovic and nadal a run for their money.
@joeylarrson4 ай бұрын
@@arisadriano1544 Leyton Hewitt in his mid 20s was 1-6 against a younger Djokovic who was not even in his prime. Hewitt, Safin and Roddick, all the same age as Fed or close, were 1-26 against Roger from 2004-2007. Teenaged Nadal, Djokovic and Murray were 10-12.
@TwoFourFourFour10 ай бұрын
Come onnnnnnnnnn
@initialize2110 ай бұрын
He was definitely an amazing player, who unfortunately got overshadowed by peak Federer. He would easily be number 1 today in this era of pure mugs and buffoons.
@Holyspace30510 ай бұрын
He won’t beat alcaraz sinner medvedev or peak zverev lol
@doctornov710 ай бұрын
I suspect the likes of Djokovic, Alcaraz, Sinner and Medvedev would beat Hewitt.
@Holyspace30510 ай бұрын
@@doctornov7 zverev dimitrov or even hurkacz tsitsipas will
@robatkinson212510 ай бұрын
No way. Hewitt would get overpowered by today's players
@al1976-v7m10 ай бұрын
@@doctornov7 actually Hewitt Medwedew would be an interesting matchup, those matches would probably last for days...
@mtklaric10 ай бұрын
Hewitt was the pioneer of todays baseline boring to the core tennis, then came Ferrero, Nadal and the rest Running left and right, muscle over mind, playing push tennis to the max....also not very charismatic
@thoughtbringer10 ай бұрын
He was good enough to fill the hole between Sampras and Federer era, not good enough for anything else. The fact that he basically disappeared from tennis when Federer and Nadal improved their game tells enough.
@c3vzn10 ай бұрын
He didn't disappear. He had a ton of surgeries and injuries between like 2005 and 2010. Every time he came back he'd work his way back into the top 50 after dropping out.
@keithrichardscorpse12309 ай бұрын
Guy was a dink off the court
@paulrogers706710 ай бұрын
Sam p and aggassi far superior players.
@さふぃねっつ10 ай бұрын
ヒューイット、プリンスのラケット使っててんな。 知らんかったわ。
@brunofernandez290610 ай бұрын
He was so good that a 20 year old Djokovic casually brushed past him in straight sets in his own hometown.
@blucat410 ай бұрын
That proves nothing, he also beat Nadal in the Australian Open on his way to the final.
@windsoracle32817 ай бұрын
xx 😊💫
@dellecapacitailcoraggiofis753610 ай бұрын
He was so boring and he was able to win something big between Sampras decline e Federer rise . In my opinion lucky
@joelxart10 ай бұрын
Yeah, the guy named Federer was a young hopeful, but could not beat Hewitt yet in 2001😂 But after 2003, Federer would never lost to Hewitt again.
@infinitepossibilities33710 ай бұрын
Um…no. Hewitt beat Federer in his final match against him.
@Baz.00710 ай бұрын
Hewitt was good at his prime. But calling him "great" is just over dramatic. Sampras, Agassi, Federer, Nadal, Novak are the true GREAT players.
@Bbirks9 ай бұрын
He only won two Grand Slam titles. He was good, but wasn’t that good