How It Works: New Carriers Gameplay | World of Warships

📖 🎁 Play for free on PC! 👉 wo.ws/3YaUKus
New carriers are already in the game! Here is a short guide how to play on them!
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @worldofwarshipsoffici...
⚓⚓⚓
Keep an eye out on the official World of Warships website: wo.ws/website
Follow us on
/ worldofwarshipscom
/ discord
/ worldofwarships
/ worldofwarships
/ worldofwarships
/ worldofwarships
/ worldofwarships
/ worldofwarships

[@WorldofWarshipsOfficialChannel]

3:25 Upgrades were updated in version 0.9.1. The relevant list of upgrades, their descriptions and correct icons can be seen in the game client

[@ottobismarck6623]

please put the old game mode of the aircraft carriers was much more fun

[@shyvini4026]

I returned to the game from before this update and everything is still fun..... exept carriers

[@tolerantset9321]

Can you please add aircraft carriers to world of warships legend, it’s my dream to play one

[@vixeny4708]

Pls

[@imper387]

I loved playing The old world of warships CVs because it reminded me my child hood game "Battlestation: Pacific". now the CVs suck.

[@vp21ct]

I wasn't very good at carrier gameplay. But I deeply enjoyed the old carrier gameplay. I greatly enjoyed carefully managing my flights. I deeply enjoyed having to make a choice between escorting my bombers or escorting my friendly ships. I deeply enjoyed the calculated risk I took in positioning myself close enough to be able to rotate my attack wings in and out effectively. It was difficult to master, and provided carrier players with a mode of gameplay that felt both completely different, and yet very fitting. I stopped playing for some time, but I can honestly say that I will not be coming back until they restore the RTS mode of Carrier gameplay.

[@ancestraldragon]

CV got blamed too much, if they dont escort friendly ship, they got the blame. if their attack plane got destroyed because no one escort them, they got the blame. if CV user did good job, they never get praised because "its how they suppose to do". with this new CV gameplay, CV player can be selfish and enjoy the game without getting blamed much

[@ok-lf4ps]

@@ancestraldragon But that is not important. Every time i was blamed, i simply thought that the stupid teammates couldn't understand the complexity of the management of running efficilently a cv and ignored them. I admit that I was rather a noob, but i loved playing my Ryujo and Taiho. I was a 50k from Hakuryu before 0.8.0... no one can give me back the time i spent in 2 years to reach T10, nor give me Free xp to compensate my broken dream.

[@xUSMC1775x]

shepard1707 ok

[@DavidWilliams-pw3ml]

I totally agree. Thought I'd try it after about 8 months...WHAT A MESS no more for me

[@livewyr7227]

Yep.. done with CV after 3 matches... Wow. I kinda wish BBs could only turn one turret at a time, and be unable to control the ship while they do it.... That's about equivalent.

[@fabiospasiano9885]

“You can simply press F” To pay respect

[@sinhangso5107]

F to escape from planes

[@LordTerias]

F o7

[@rod2d2rs]

why is F for respect? I keep seeing it here and there, but don't know why.

[@dimaselang3991]

@@rod2d2rs Meme , CS:Go Or Something Else Thats Means Fire Or Pat Respect

[@rod2d2rs]

@@dimaselang3991 It's a CS:Go meme then. Thanks!

[@whyno713]

Devs should of given CV drivers the choice of either the old RTS scheme or the new action/arcade fighting style and balanced the 2 out accordingly

[@2020heinsite]

Before this patch there were players who loved the top down RTS character of CV gameplay. This patch not only ruined their game but everyone else's as well. The term 'broken" doesn't even begin to describe what random gameplay is now. I will have nothing to do with any modes other than co op, scenarios, or ranked until balance is restored, or I'll just retire completely. I respect the effort of the design team but frankly believe it's already time to cut the losses before they deal the game a fatal blow. Admit the mistakes, pull the patch, revert to 0.7.12, & resume testing or give up. The loss of 3.5 yrs of goodwill simply won't be worth the costs of standing by this mess for a month.

[@zsside2370]

I like the aircraft carriers tho. Never played this game, heard its coming to ps4. Might booth the old bastard up

[@Yuki_Ika7]

From one form of sky cancer to another

[@hcrun]

@@zsside2370 "Never played this game, heard its coming to ps4." That is >>EXACTLY

[@soundspark2072]

Dave Hein I really do miss the top down RTS style and this just ruined the absolute hell out of the carrier. I can’t even play it anymore

[@xUSMC1775x]

Dave Hein ok

[@spadasin100]

I hate the new changes. Please do a survey in game to show the real impact of like or not like. This change along with the new rank arm race monster makes a huuuge impact on this former beutiful game

[@eMercody]

They actually did during the testing, 70 or 60% were positive.

[@KnightofDark00180]

+eMercody 70% of testers. What, less than a hundred? A thousand? That's not even 90% of the playerbase of warships. Literally, they listened to the dumbass minority that don't even main CV's. Most who actually had any knowledge about CV's, said it was a shit update.

[@isaacthesharkwolf9038]

i dunno, it seems like an ok-ish mechanic, though it'd be great if they just allowed for varied options of carrier gameplay, maybe take the approach of battlestations pacific, where you have a hybrid of RTS and manual controll

[@antondegroot6061]

@@eMercody An change from something that was in some respects terrible will easilly score positively. Under the old system carriers were too OP. Under the new system they are less OP, but it is frustrating for the surface ship that he can't fight back and taking down airplanes has very little meaning for the carrier. Best of all would be to remove carriers all together.

[@baohoang4966]

yeah stfu, no one care !! Peoples enjoying this, be better and adapt !!

[@shironee_2384]

One of the main reason why CV was so important at ww2 was they're the key to achieve air superiority in the open waters. They're not just for attacking role, they protecting the fleet, why you dev remove it?

[@freddederman7270]

And irl carriers strike multiple targets at the same time (back ww2 especially because there was a war going on) but know you attack one target at one time

[@makary2227]

The new carriers are literally UNPLAYABLE!!! Seriously WG, bring the old ones back!

[@danielmaloney128]

Agreed!

[@bjornwegener3233]

yes, you are right. It is completely unrealistic to send down only 2 planes. the rest takes fire and dies. It's completely impossible to make meaningful damage with a carrier. Edit: haven't played this dumpster fire since

[@sinoskopyasky]

@@bjornwegener3233 It's often easy to farm damage with carriers. I regularly get 150k damage when playing them.

[@ralado31]

@@Alex-ml3di Indeed it is, but thats not the point. The game simply got boring after this rework

[@a_wisepenny9227]

I actually prefer this new update over the old one they should do a hybrid in my opinion that way both sides will be satisfied where you control the aircraft like they show it in the video but you can also RTS in the middle or something like that but I prefer the new way of playing aircraft carriers to some it's boring and to some it's really fun and exciting but everyone has the own opinions

[@OmniLuis]

This is a MASSIVE STEP BACK in this game, we are all begging you while you are still on time, MAKE A ROLLBACK!

[@nimarogames8218]

Luis Jimenez they didn’t do it, The ac gameplay is less strategical now

[@MrJJuK]

how this a massive step back? takes skill now to use rather than RNG

[@huyme5380]

@@MrJJuK it still take skill before, to position your plane correctly, to escort and cover friendly and if you dont like the rts just play bb or dd, now it broken either too op or too underpower

[@MrJJuK]

@@huyme5380 it was an RTS game that was utter shite and boring. Now it's fun and people want to play them.

[@MrJJuK]

@@huyme5380 CVs should be OP because they are OP 👍🤣

[@chiefsheperd6157]

bring back the old aircraft carrier gameplay please

[@bomcstoots1]

Yeah I thought it was auto ai squads. But having to control them sucks

[@JustARegularSeal]

Its still on mobile

[@andruhabro5497]

@@JustARegularSeal its mobile! and on mobile is trash graphic and plane physics!

[@jarod997]

Next, you're actually telling us NOT to maneuver when we're on our attack run with torpedo bombers, but during that time if we don't maneuver we're sitting ducks for AA.

[@bjornwegener3233]

I tried this many times, it makes no freaking difference wether you wiggle or stay still, the damage you take is linear and relative to the distance of the AA fire source.

[@tranminhnguyen6217]

@@bjornwegener3233 i can't understand this gameplay

[@charon_lix]

I just came back after 2 years or so of only carrier. I hate how as Americans we get 2 torpedoes per attack run meaning we get a tiny area of affect and only 2 drops per strafing run. This means every strafing run we're bound to lose 2 or 3 planes sometimes more while directly flying over the ship we just attempted to bomb. Not to mention, being under constant AA fire after trying to circle around to bomb again. Great precision is required as you only get 2 torpedoes a run. I liked it better when you had the chance to make a wall of 6 torpedoes per strafing run

[@8RedBear5]

0.8.0 Has to be the most Anger and Frustration inducing WoWs Updates I've ever experienced. I don't even want to log in and play with the current mess that is going on.

[@Arc_Noir]

reminds me of the release of DotA 2 7.20 update. people will accept it slowly

[@weiwang4968]

@@Arc_Noir Then a large number of loyal players leave WOW

[@isimanica1]

@@weiwang4968 I know I haven't touched the game since this new setup came out. Hopped on for a couple of matches and realized why I play war thunder now instead of World of Tanks and Warplanes. With the addition of their own ships I think I may be skipping this game now too. Of course it is sad after all the preorders I have done with this game.

[@MichaelLaferriere]

@@Arc_Noir doesnt seem like they have.

[@stealthpro123]

I’ve given the new update a go and honestly, the RTS system was so much better. I think all it really needed was for ships to have increased AA range so that it encourages players to sail together to cover each other. This update was a huge step backwards. The mechanics have become soo dumbed down its ridiculous why is player skill being punished? If the carriers were of equal skill they would tend to cancel each other out anyways because fighter squadrons made for a good deterrent. Now carriers are free to strike any ship they want. I thought the point of the rework was to make CVs less powerful. I’m afraid this rework has achieved the opposite.

[@samuelsoetratma8408]

It’s all for the goddamn console ports

[@ToxicGamer3000]

i come back to this game after 2-3 years later AND JUST BRING BACK THE OLD CONTROLS

[@cameronloska8193]

SAME, I haven't played in two years and was in the mood for aircraft shenanigans, and I'm greeted with this dog shit

[@ToxicGamer3000]

@@cameronloska8193 yeah, it's total bull now and it's so irritating that you can only use one aircraft at a time...

[@pubgchanell6843]

@@ToxicGamer3000 let's say I am in a battleship Ok? in the old system. Ok?now how will I feel when I get attacked by 3 aircraft squadrons at the same time, (or a 10-second delay)

[@Solo_Wing_Pixy]

i didn't know that carriers were better, I love the current gameplay

[@il_lsassi]

@@pubgchanell6843 Bro with you don't know how to move against a torpedo, get back to tier 1

[@glock17games]

I would like to see a "how to get your premium time refunded"

[@deleted_215]

It’s like evolving, just backwards!

[@petersmulders8058]

lol but yer i miss fighters

[@Ralph-yn3gr]

Combine this with the old system. Want to manually control one squadron during an attack? You can, and as an incentive the attacks are more accurate. Want to not do that and coordinate the attacks of multiple squadrons all at once (you know, like an AIRCRAFT CARRIER), you can, but each squadron's attacks are less accurate. Want every plane in a squadron to attack? Want to control one squadron in flight? You can, and as an incentive they take less AA damage when passing ships. Want to not do that and coordinate the flight paths of multiple squadrons (you know, like an AIRCRAFT CARRIER)? You can! Set them to do so. Want only half or a third of the squadron to do so? Set them to do so, and have the planes not attacking take significantly less AA damage since they can focus on maneuvering to avoid it. Want to send a fighter escort? YOU CAN! As it is, this system is trash and has taken away any reason for me to play aircraft carriers (and thus buy premium carriers). Remember how the US won the Battle of Midway by sending out one dive bomber squadron at a time and waiting for them to attack and return to the ships before sending out another? I don't, because that's not how they won. They sent multiple squadrons that hit the Japanese ships, and here's a novel concept, *at the same time.*

[@oddivar4941]

This feels like a step back tbh, AA sector does not feel right either.

[@rzu1474]

AA is schrödingers cat... It kills you or not and you only know it when you fly into it.

[@onaucc9899]

It doesn't overlap anymore. When planes fly into the mid range aa, the long range aa doesn't fire anymore. When planes fly into the close range aa, midrange and long range don't fire. Which, obviously, is complete, absolute bullshit.

[@clankplusm]

@@onaucc9899 well long range at close range is kinda BS but besides that yeah I guess, thanks for nerf batting Haida's aa though.

[@ralado31]

Maybe because it's a step back? No, perhaps it's three steps back.

[@christopherscarlett7301]

@@onaucc9899 why is it bull shit, more realistic, you don't shoot long range at point blank

[@DSHPerotecH]

I just came back to the game since like 2017, super confused why the carrier system was dumbed down. Honestly, the fact that carriers were micro-intensive, yet could be dominating in the right hands, felt accurate to how they were in the war.

[@TwoFace1976]

give me the old controls, this sucks big time

[@stevenweller9413]

I can shorten this video drastically. "It doesn't."

[@madeingermany9445]

I tested them in the tst. It's now so boring to play cv. Now it's like start, fly, die and repeat! And that you have to send back your planes to control the carrier is just stupid. The RTS gsmeplay was much better. Give me my carriers back how i Love them to play in RTS!

[@JuJuNsPL]

Agreed !!!!

[@wangsheng_official]

nope i didn't play the test but I love the new carriers

[@tomkroebel4936]

You can control your CV on the tactical map by setting a course even when you have planes up ... but it's a pain compared to the old RTS gameplay.

[@madeingermany9445]

@@wangsheng_official How was it for you to play the RTS carrier?

[@madeingermany9445]

@@tomkroebel4936 i know that but it's easier to dodge torps or to use consumables from your ship when needed and the autopilot is not that good for it or the automatical use of consumables from your ship what they want to put in the game if they don't have yet

[@richardbell7678]

The CV rework means that you can only play CVs if you have the ability to twitch click. The one thing in the old CV play that I was good at was using my fighters to achieve air superiority, but fighters are now a consumable. Between having to dodge anti-aircraft fire and having to release bombs/torpedoes at the correct instant, I went from being a middling CV player who could send aircraft to the right places at nearly the right times to an AFK battleship that could spot enemies at a distance in co-op matches (while it was possible that the enemy CV player might be just as bad as me, I did not try to play my reworked CV in a random battle). I cannot twitch click well enough to play the reworked CVs. I play World of Warships, because you can even be terrible at twitch clicking and still play well enough to contribute to the team and have fun. The intent of the CV rework was to open CV play to a larger pool of players. While other players may experience different results, the CV rework has completely shut me out of playing CVs.

[@aceofspadesguy4913]

Except the thing is, carriers were never for the noobs. From the start WG had bragged that CVs were for the “strategic players.” Now it’s just a fucking arcade mode.

[@jonathanday93]

Tiers 6 and 8 are pretty much useless if uptiered... there was no point getting rid of the odd tiers

[@aceofspadesguy4913]

I hadn’t played the game in forever and was playing a lot recently because of the subs, then I realized “hey where did my bogue go?”

[@jonathanday93]

@@aceofspadesguy4913 I think a lot 9f people probably thought the same thing

[@General_Ace]

Good thing I'm a newbie, I never used the old aircraft carriers so I have nothing to be mad at.

[@isaacthesharkwolf9038]

am willing to try it out now actually, carrier gameplay seems to work a litle more like it is in battlestations pacific, which imo is pretty good

[@Delta-es1lg]

@@isaacthesharkwolf9038 In BS Pacific, you can launch multiple squadrons and let ai fly them while you direct, like the old CV gameplay, or take control yourself and switch between them, like the new gameplay. I would have prefered that over being stuck in one squadron at a time.

[@yajamanvamsikrishna509]

@@Delta-es1lg if they do that then sky cancer at lowertires is multiplied by 1000 times

[@01Gshadow]

@@yajamanvamsikrishna509 Not exactly, because you CAN fly a fighter squadron in BS Pacific. If the playstyle like the one in BS Pacific, it will be more intense for carriers in both team because you have to fight enemy fighters first to get air supremacy so you can do any aerial attack. That's more fun to play and more historical accurate at the same time. Helping your teammates winning air combat become more important than just being a sky cancer. To be honest, this game has a lot things need to learn from his ironiclly not quite realistic but somewhat fun spiritual predecessor.

[@yajamanvamsikrishna509]

@@01Gshadow ooh thanks for telling me

[@YuriPRIMErpg]

I'm meh about this change, but please, WG, for the love of god, can you make targeting crosshairs for bombers show the actual position when they'll be when you initiate attack, instead of a FRIGGIN MILE AHEAD?! What's the bloody point?!

[@melkormedia7413]

It says in the tips bit when you load in that all the target reticles are for fully aimed attacks, which is why they're usually a bit far forward.

[@YuriPRIMErpg]

@@melkormedia7413 Yes, but it doesn't make a lick of sense when the planes themselves almost halt in place to a point where you attack a ship from behind, the ships are faster then your approach... with planes! They almost turn static. It would be much more helpful to have two markers then, one where the bombing run starts and one where it's on max focus (even if the latter is simplistic representation)

[@melkormedia7413]

@@YuriPRIMErpg that's why you don't attack from behind or save your boost for when you're in AA range attacking

[@reeddragon5250]

Tip for you,, the bom rectingle is vertical oval isn't it? use the uppper rectingle as your guidance, when the squadron start climbing the circle will move forward, if you not moving your squadron the cicle will tighten, when the squadron start diving, the rectingle will stop right in the bottom of your squadron, try to strike from front or back of enemy ship, that will do massive dmg,, and remember, don't hunt DD with your DB, that useless, and also remember that your squadron altitude also effect the impact time of your bomb

[@hailitalia86]

@Neoimperialist1 True, I've given up on DDs for now. Much better survivability chance in cruisers or battleships if you sail as a fleet. It's actually encouraging teamwork in Random Battle, not all the time, but much more than before.

[@eflatun5896]

I've returned the game after 2 years and have a shock! I can't control all squadrons simultaneously! While going to enemy ship, enemy aircrafts hunts me easily!

[@kagakai7729]

Can I get the 240 dollars I spent on Kaga, Enterprise, and Saipan back

[@causticchan4617]

Fucken a kaga was weak before now its useless no offense haha

[@Shadowsolider1]

If you're in a country with decent consumer protect laws you should be able to.

[@nightstar6900]

WG recompensate you all CV with dublons, but to late for this. You have only 30 days.

[@wangsheng_official]

Lol ok Kaga Says you who keeps playing Enterprise last week

[@stephaniebertiaux444]

dude uncool you should not laugh at peoples mistakes

[@dmitrijgetman572]

Destroyed the game for me...

[@curtisc6768]

Yup took a good thing and fucked it up

[@user-ef7ko4qq7w]

Noob

[@KaijuNumberEight]

That's a weird way to say you're to lazy to learn a new way to plah.

[@dmitrijgetman572]

@@KaijuNumberEight It wasn't. I mastered it! But it is a different game.

[@mmbleachtasty6121]

Thae games not an rpg wimp

[@Zenn3k]

Where the "How to attack" video for when all 12 enemy ships are hugging one another and your planes die in half a second if you even ATTEMPT to attack them?

[@emanu1674]

You engage with Battleships

[@jorgesantos85]

Now there's D.D. Halland who has a huge anti-aircraft defense power.

[@a_wisepenny9227]

I don't get it this is really true in the game but people here are complaining that the anti-aircraft doesn't work like bruh

[@neilbaird2789]

More carriers in tier 10 matches please! Six per game is not enough!

[@dasomi1]

R.I.P. WoWs... It‘s time to grab the other games i have...

[@stuartemmanuel3735]

Do go ahead, its quitters like you who will never win..

[@dasomi1]

Riker Keyes is no more the same game i play... when someone like the new game (because it is an other game) then he is free to go ahed... For me it‘s a new game i do not like... because of that i am not a quitter... but it is the chois of the customer... have fun in 1 month whit the waiting lanes...

[@stamp45stamp3005]

Which tier ship are you playing? If you quit this game because of your squadron die too fast. Then, had better try to watching some videos to improve your skills.

[@leftyelomis1824]

try ranked. no cvs or tier X memes. there's still premium bullshit but the battles are surprisingly playable.

[@anvutrong6870]

War thunder

[@rikka_ttbn]

How about it doesn't work?

[@auramoonlight6978]

I only wanted this cuz I thought the aircraft carrier launches Auto claims that they would go out and love your enemies for you instead of you take control of them but no there is no AI controlling them you have to do all the work that stinksit would be more convenient if the AI bombers went out fighting while you were busy attacking from the sea I think it would have been better if they had that feature

[@Kuastoyn]

I see what you guys were going for, and i don't think this new game-play is necessarily bad, and is fairly fun but really was dramatic departure from some of the aspects of carriers that made them both challenging and enjoyable. Firstly, part of what made carriers' entertaining for me was the management aspect, having to keep track of a lot of moving parts to include the carrier itself, and i wish there was a way to toggle back to my carrier to adjust course or respond to threats without forcing my squadron back to the carrier. I think there is a healthy medium here and this new game play certainly made CVs more of a class of ship and less of a mini-game within the greater game (which was really difficult to understand at first) but i think we lost something along the way.

[@zeoik99]

Congrats Wargaming, you really did it, you put the last nail on the coffin for Wows.........Bravo

[@mortallychallenged1436]

Feedback: Just uninstalled the game.

[@malang152]

Truth

[@alparslankayhan1762]

you are the most rightfull person in the world fuking morons they fuck the game and this proves they have no brain

[@m.rizkyakbar9722]

Yeah, nice. The new control is to hard

[@MichaelLaferriere]

I havent played since. I and I contributed to their game once in a while. Too many people wanted to zip around in BBs zoomed in and got pissed off because they didnt pay attention and got sunk.

[@SavageCoach101]

@@MichaelLaferriere I only play Legends now. This update killed it

[@dizzywinds1363]

I really wish you guys could combine this patch and the previous patch so that we can control all our planes while being able to fire with third person view

[@clinte7590]

You guys destroyed the play of how carriers work!

[@reeddragon5250]

Hey WG, I have a good Idea, why not bring back the fighter as controllable squadron? just put them 3 or 4 aircraft per squadron, the way they attack is like strafing, but with limited ammo, once the ammo is depleted they'll return to the CV and only can be use one strike before taking off again.. I think that will have for the DD spotting and hunting issues

[@AzureRoxe]

The RTS gameplay was one of the best things in the game and learning how to play it correctly was an amazing feeling. I really have no idea why you felt the need to rework them so much, especially with how weak they feel now.

[@Hproawesome]

AzureRoxe People complain the rts season system at higher tier was op and get dev strike by a single midway carrier duh.

[@richardbell7678]

The pre-rework CVs had the problem that the players' skills were important in the boring bits of making sure that the aircraft did not fly over AA-rich enemies on their way to their target, or that your fighters flew to engage enemy aircraft, but had no effect on evading AA fire or putting the weapons on target. Not all players were good at that and I had enough trouble with only one squadron of each type of aircraft. The the reworked CV play makes some of the boring bits more interesting and eliminates the rest and allows the player's skills to influence putting weapons on targets and evading AA fire. The CV rework did not weaken CVs, it changed what skills were needed to make CVs powerful. CVs are no weaker than they were before, but now they need a different skill set to use effectively. The rework was done because too many players could not make the old CVs work, at all. Unfortunately, the rework has made it difficult for the players that could use the old CVs to use the reworked CVs.

[@AzureRoxe]

Then just nerf them a bit? They didn't need to rework it fully. They pulled a Blizzard with this, reworking something instead of simply nerfing it slightly.

[@kbeceamibala]

Rts cvs were just cáncer., this update creates New opportunity to balance cvs, it Will take time but it Will be better than before

[@poidachi6003]

It gives a light of hope for DD's, if you played the CV branch with the older version, you know how you can destroy DD's in one single drop..that's a good rework for me...the only thing that bothers me is the aa since its too OP to even strafe a BB now. If you don't like it, you can get 100% refund, if you don't like the game anymore, then uninstall, simple as that.

[@dqian86]

feel very arcady...oh wait that's what you aiming for right, so that you can push the game to console platform?

[@jstone8513]

Aircraft carriers aren't even on console

[@thebravegallade731]

War thunder exists, more realistic, still on console. They have no excuse. I went to WT for tanks and aircraft cause they are better, WoWs was the last one I still kept playing cause WT's is still in infancy. Guess it's bye now...

[@lordredlead2336]

Yes it's great in concole

[@lordredlead2336]

@@thebravegallade731 I love both games of funny that war thunder has a really smaller player base than wargaming's games

[@nhanthaithanh3575]

The CV rework is killing DD more lul

[@YuriPRIMErpg]

So Wargaming invented a cure for cancer? XD

[@wangsheng_official]

​@@YuriPRIMErpg The Akizuki AA is pretty decent now

[@franciscodetonne4797]

@@YuriPRIMErpg Said the cause of cancer

[@Ralathar44]

My DDs are doing fine. Heck my low tier Mutsuki became an AA monster with sectoring and the +2 flak module. As good as the Nicholas now, got 41 plane kills in a game because I screened between them and my team after we secured a cap point, dodged shells, and threw torps at ships trying to contest. My concealment was good so they didn't see me until flak started or I turned the AA on :P.

[@wangsheng_official]

@@Ralathar44 omg i might want to try AA specced mutsuki

[@joshuadaniel8508]

Tier 4 Carriers are hard to play -.-

[@snipplez8657]

and now they get two torpedos in their payload! oh and they dont get shot down because tier 3-5 aa is dogshit! oh yeah so basicaly 6 torps because they dont get shot down, yay!

[@thatoneguy4459]

Hosho good but bring back the old rts

[@Vxylon]

I dunno man, only came back to this game recently and only now found out about this... I'm kinda disappointed to be honest. I enjoyed the RTS / birds eye view Aircraft Carrier gameplay. It was enjoyable to manage multiple squadrons at once attacking multiple ships and supporting teammates as they push.

[@madeingermany9445]

Why are you making now a how to play cv when we needed it befor this "good" rework?? Can you guys tell me that?

[@user-dp4ok9ox5w]

Because they were probably working on this for ages.

[@Ralathar44]

Because it'd take a 30 minute video to give a BASIC overview of RTS gameplay not because it was hard but because it was full of esoteric mechanics.

[@pelotudo4717]

because they knew they were going to get rid of the rts gameplay, and it would have been a waste of time. Now they know how the game is going to be, and it's also a good way to tell everyone rts is not coming back

[@Luigi-uw5un]

MadeInGermany94 Well they didnt do it for the RTS gameplay, but IChaseGaming did a 30min vid on it so.....

[@majesticface3631]

I think they should reinstate the old way but use this method to micro manage the squadron. I also wanna know if they could ever make a option to manually shoot down aircrafts

[@darkmoone9984]

Guessing there is no way to assign a fighter group to escort duty?

[@reeddragon5250]

This is my taught after this update, CA bullied CV, CV bullied DD, BB sitting in the corner drinking a cup of Coffea

[@nukleardackel]

Horrible! Please, Please reinstall the old mechanic!!!!!!!

[@gfr9109]

Ah yes, the old RTS mechanics that allowed a good player to absolutely dominate the match and be far too powerful, whilst inexperienced CV players cannot even lift a finger and were basically a detriment to their own team. Most of the new mechanics are broken because, well, they're new. They're effectively still in a testing phase, and WG has announced that a hotfix that fixrs most of the more pressing issues will release soon.

[@bluefoxy6478]

@@gfr9109 I liked the old RTS considering you can easily learn it, and it can make some good money on the side and allows you to take out your anger when you sunk 69 times and lost 66 of those times. It helped me with my anger, sure I can take a small update or 2 as long as i can make good money even though i didnt do much except try to help the team and still have the same controls. But, this, just ruined WoW for me, I lose money every time i play it, its super complicated to use, and i lose planes left and right.

[@Luigi-uw5un]

bobspineable You Geh

[@CrystallizedBlackSkull]

@@gfr9109 Oh well there is this thing called "Get good" and you dont get that by making the worst re-work in all of gaming

[@gfr9109]

@@CrystallizedBlackSkull I hope you noticed that you're replying to an 8-month old comment that was made when all features were actually subject to change. As it turned out, not much did change but how would someone be able to know that at that point in time?

[@Hanimichal]

6:43 "Good luck in battle" my concern that is what we have left in wow... (world of warship or world of warplanes?)

[@Delta-es1lg]

Bring back the old Carriers please!

[@benjimiller8930]

I started playing this game again, and went, "Yeah okay, time to try a carrier again." I was completely befuddled by the new workings of the carriers but figured I was just missing that there was some way to control multiple squadrons as usual and I just didn't know how to switch out of manual control of squadrons. Nope, carriers are just boring and useless now. Cool.

[@nebulaswirl]

REVERT THE UPDATE.

[@edrick106]

" Upgrade! FUCK! GO BACK! "

[@Toblerown_ch]

Return the Odd tiers, then this may be tolerable

[@TangledThorns]

Tried it, you ruined over a quarter of the branches in the game. I just wish I could get a refund for the year of premium time I recently purchased.

[@Its_YourImagination]

Ranked is so stupid.............all the CC's I watch hate it big time......WOW has really screwed up this time. Not sure how they recover from this.T9 was a bad idea for ranked. All it is is Kita and Black with smoke and radar. So ridiculous. Not even fun.

[@cristianmicu]

they gave you that huge discount only for warships for a reason

[@jaredw9171]

Settle down Chicken Little. It's a brand new meta and you gotta give the population time to get over the brand new changes.

[@KnightofDark00180]

+Jared W a meta that clearly was half-baked and had little to no time to actually be tested properly. They only had small test groups look at it, likely the ones who were most likely to say "yea this is fine", and barely played CV enough. Meanwhile, CV mains on main branch are completely fine with the normal CV, then are forced to have to play this shit. This isn't a meta, it's a fucking nerf, renamed to keep people from throwing a shit-fit.

[@SacreDro]

Me too, payed for a full year of premium to have this shit update. WoWs is slowly dieing like WoT.

[@LunaEclipsum]

R.I.P. Carriers. the only line i actually enjoyed playing in this game for its tactical aspects."Press F" to pay respects

[@randomshitpost8477]

Sorry to say this but I feel like dis update made aircraft carrier unplayable it was already shit now it's worst

[@madeingermany9445]

It was befor difficult to learn but better than now

[@randomshitpost8477]

@@madeingermany9445 it is easy it I just making aircraft carrier gameplay useless cuz u can only fly team of planes per time

[@jinyuliu2871]

This was definitely a reduction in power for aircraft carriers but I think it is needed. Good cv players had so much influence on the outcome of a game and having a bad cv on your team used to be an almost guaranteed defeat. The new system balances the influence of cv with surface ships and made cv play a lot more approachable for players who are not into RTS. It is not an easy change but I think it would eventually be good for the game as a whole. Changes are always difficult...

[@101jir]

@@jinyuliu2871 Reduces the influence of carriers perhaps, but at the cost of forcing them to do exactly what it was other players got frustrated over (sending attacks without providing cover) at the expense of what irritated carrier players most (overwhelming AA preventing your planes from doing much). Basically other classes get the end of carriers they liked the least (getting repeatedly torped/bombed) and carriers have to repeatedly do what annoyed them the most: send their planes into overhwelming AA fire without really a chance to outmanuever the other team's carrier. There is no sense of outmanuevering the other carrier, just damage farming. Damage farming in the most annoying way, both sides lose out on this one. With every other class, you feel like you really have to outthink your opponent. Here it just seems like mindless farming. They "rebalanced" carriers in a manner of speaking, but at the cost of forcing the gameplay to focus on elements carriers and other classes hated.

[@Aaron-wq3jz]

@GunslingerXXI absolutely correct, maybe they should make a game smiley based on carrier gameplay. They could have rebalance the carriers by just reducing the damage

[@thekingsamar5781]

Still prefer the older version of the carriers, it actually felt like an Actual Aircraft Carriers, not world of Warplanes, but its wg, what can we except from them?

[@thekingsamar5781]

@rex1supersaur23 that's something I agree on, but the old way made the cv unique, now they're bbs and dds, but on planes. And don't take my words wrong, i like the new way, but i preferred the old one.

[@pdcouto]

Just bought a CV, didn't play them for 1year. I totally regret it. Came to search some guide and this is just terrible. If I wanted to control planes I would get another game. How can you not get more squadrons on the air?! Old control method was just fine! So, as right now: Played carrier once > Found it terrible > Saw this guide > Selling CV.

[@nitsu2947]

I actually had some fun with the old gameplay, i only used Langley shortly before the update came, when the prototype is being comunity tested Edit: i ended up quitting the game for some time now, i want to get back, but my PC and internet WiFi, can't handle the requirements for WoWs

[@greatwarships2758]

POSSIBLE SOLUTION: Make 2 settings for carrier gameplay in port: simple and advanced. Simple carrier gameplay will make you play the reworked version of carrier gameplay. Advanced will allow you to return to the older carrier gsmeplay.

[@IV-V-vi]

and those with the old system have to play against players who are using the same settings so the battle will be balanced, of course, same for the new one as well.

[@OhYeaMista]

Why? Who asked for this??

[@poidachi6003]

the destroyer line, the battleship line, the Heavy cruiser no AA line...

[@KnightofDark00180]

+poidachi so everyone that wasn't smart enough to turn. Or better yet, just ask their own friendly CV to cover them? Yea. Like, 10 percent of players. The dumbasses who couldn't figure out that skill can't be balanced. So this is the result. A half-baked "rework" that is retardedly simple, and has made CV's useless.

[@titouancoy3948]

Kids who don't undersand the game.....

[@rolan4dezwinz381]

KnightofDark001 Quit crying and go outside for once. What a baby, wa wa wa you have to change your play style for something. No wonder your a chair warrior, all you want to do is complain about things out of ur control and blame others just because you don’t like it. Improve your life.

[@bluefoxy6478]

@@rolan4dezwinz381 oh so your one of those people who thinks gamers dont have a life and are just losers and think your superior

[@roentgenfruit736]

I get that CVs were considered cancer by many, but there were still people who loved the complexity of multitasking and positioning squadrons to fend off fighters and attack ships. Now, the community is even more divided about CVs. Come on WG, you’re shooting yourself in the foot!

[@RumboaCherburgo]

R.I.P. WoWs

[@MohdArif-pl3sy]

How it work Control panel>uninstall program

[@JOA5941]

sensible

[@user-dp4ok9ox5w]

Good bye!

[@cristianmicu]

hahahahaha. peace brother, i hope you find fun with another game or whatever you do. getting upset in a fkin game , whats the point if 1. takes your free time 2. dont brings you any money

[@gfarnden56]

Yip.. Im trying warthunder...

[@solace6633]

I do love the salty minority. Now good bye and take your toxic shit elsewhere

[@warriormax_]

worst patch ever!!!!!!!

[@blustick6566]

Good job WG. WT's Ship battles seem more fun then wows.

[@Jdebrusk987]

I finally logged back into my account to play World of Warships after a long time, wanted to play a carrier with my friends in my division, first attempt at in this mess of an update, couldn't believe how frustrated I got when I found out I could only control one squadron at a time after looking at this tutorial and finding out they have ruined a great game because of there updates that no one would request, thanks a lot I thought it would be fun to get back into the game but I'm just 100% disappointed to see what has happened to the game. *Uninstalling the game now*

[@danielitvidal7760]

I was a CV lover. Bring back the old gameplay.

[@onyxdragon1179]

I love how the AA guns sound now... Can't say I love how the planes work now though. I sold my Cv's after testing the new mechanics. Hated the angle in which the camera was placed on the planes (I'd love to have a FPS camera), and aiming was just too difficult. Also, even though I love how the AA sounds now, I kind of feel it's underpowered as well. My NC focused on AA is weak now.

[@akshay12588]

When i think all the effort i've put into the game buying & unlocking many different ships, different tiers , crates,flags, doubloons all gone to waste coz of a Cv rework !!!

[@user-dp4ok9ox5w]

Ehh you knew that this re-work was coming for ages did you not?

[@pelotudo4717]

I like to think they're going to keep working on this. The general idea is fine, with some balance and after getting used to the new mechanics the game should be ok.

[@gzer0x]

@@pelotudo4717 youre right, they have said multiple times this will be the focus of the next few patches.

[@user-dp4ok9ox5w]

@Neoimperialist1 Lol! It did not "poison the game completely". I enjoy playing with CV's and against CV's way more than i did before the 8.0!

[@cristianmicu]

your enjoyment and free time for future >>> all the money and xp gained in a useless game in the past. let it go. it's comparable with a ex wife in a sense lol

[@mars2skane]

You have broken the game WG for all classes except CVs. Well done. We can look forward to all CV games because who the hell would have fun playing anything else.

[@Delogros]

Decided to get wins in all my ship lines today so played about 14 battles, 4 carriers in every single fight and none of the games where interesting 12 out of the 14 where resolved purely by which side had the better carrier players so it just seems like everyone else is their xp. Playing the T8 British BB the Monarch and it's awful in part due to the rudder shift time, specced the ship for AA and even when the enemy fighters come into the fire zone which is 150% they still torp/bomb/rocket me having lost 0 planes and they always hit, and so the game seems to be unplayable, is really pissing annoying as it could be resolved by enforcing 1 carrier per team.

[@joshgray6038]

For a counter on the AA guns if fired by AA the planes would automatically spread out or have a skill to spread the planes out but the downside is it takes longer to get ready to fire torps, rockets or bombs

[@oceanphantom7477]

To everybody:in wows blitz(mobile) there is still the old way of playing carriers

[@JuJuNsPL]

Again WG shows that they don't listen to their players/customers. I remember WG CEO said that this mistake will never happen again … after bad decisions in WoT !!! And what now Mr CEO … now it is even harder than before. Whole community is against WG decisions regarding new carriers system in WoWs … and as always WG DO NOT CARE at all :) !!! I hope You will feel Your customers power soon when Money incomes will drop !!! Seems WG workers don't listen to their CEO … nice policy. Financial problems are coming … GREETINGS.

[@Predator42ID]

You mean nerfing a warship which replaced the BB in the main capital role for a reason.

[@LordKrobekishnuv]

seth Thomas this isn’t a simulation game, it’s not suppose to be completely historically accurate, if that’s what you want go read history books. This is suppose to be a game. The main point to bring in money. What’s the best way to bring in money? Why, by making a fun and engaging game that people want to play of course! What makes games fun? Good balance, interesting scenarios/game modes, good maps to play on, and fairness for all. These are especially important to free to play games that rely on the player base to constantly provide money, as it is their main source of revenue. This rework, and cvs in general, seem to throw game balance off, and make things less fun for other ship types.

[@Its_YourImagination]

AMEN !!!!!! they will learn !!!!!!!!

[@Arturas1244]

and you are wrong wot is now insanely good, hd graphics core engine havoc elements, if you are noob where you will die fast where, in wow i think cvs where broken too overpovered, when you play at bigger tiers you get 2 squadrons torpedoes and you just sink too hard to evade aa was not really good. If your cv is idiot game is lost.

[@rolan4dezwinz381]

Cry me a river; do you have statistics to back up your claim? No? Then shut your lying butt up.

[@tomkroebel4936]

Why is the mouse also used for steering planes instead of only changing the view direction like it is for ships? Please fix this or let the player turn it off.

[@leftyelomis1824]

it's for minor adjustments. Though being able to turn it off is actually a nice idea.

[@pelotudo4717]

just right click lol

[@offroader5]

How do you "adjust your aim" narrowing and widening the aiming triangle for the torp planes?

[@scpstudio1811]

You should be able to send planes to attack somewhere and also control them

[@hikarusugiyama4460]

I use destroyers and cruisers and this update is a pain in the @$$ because i keep getting spotted

[@chialingchew1857]

Thanks for this timely video, but I do hope the next episode will come out early, as AA currently appear inconsistent to me, need enlightenment on it.

[@inklink8471]

I play with the old system, and even if it was difficult to understand at first, it was way more fun than.... this.

[@Galba89]

Can we please get the old carriers back?

[@eemelilounela1212]

I was actually planning to come back to WoWS after a break of a year or so... I guess not then?

[@emanu1674]

Hellooooo, this game is not an aircraft carrier simulator you dipshit

[@S0RCERESS]

@@emanu1674 helllo a weebs opinion dosent matter

[@emanu1674]

@@S0RCERESS But your opinion is wrong, so i win

[@TE5LA-GAMING]

A lot of comments about the old style. Problem was, there was no tutorial anywhere about how those mechanics worked, so most players, including myself, never tried them. I don't want to cripple a team by going in blind and not knowing at all what to do. Had there been any tutorials or a solo practice mode, perhaps it wouldn't have died. Old carriers were OP, probably why the older players liked it. The new system is way underpowered. Carriers need a large buff. In the old style, you could have several squadrons in the air at one time.

[@walney2008]

as far as AA, they are very strong I have the Hosho and the Range, I would also like to know the time to launch the torpedoes forward because they deviate from the same and always error, I would like more videos on tactics with these new aircraft carriers and thank you.

[@batllemaster]

why sometimes i lunch the torpedo but dont hit the ship ? is a bug?

[@fernandomarques5166]

You might not be giving enough lead on the drop, torps take quite the distance to arm

[@natahn9568]

3:32

[@pino3Attila]

They have degraded the cv which I brought up since I started, I'll never forget.

[@auramoonlight6978]

I think it would be better if the aircrafts were controlled by the AI as another option that way while they're busy bombing your enemy you can focus on the ships in in front of you like multitasking (^^)

[@montgom71]

I like how 99/100 people hate this but wargaming choose to listen to that 1 out of 100 person

[@gamer-ot1xf]

We need a Vote poll on the main site if they should bring back the old RTS

[@shimonbarkokhba3433]

god wills it

[@artabro]

How is it that an airplane refueled the torpedoes, the bombs and the rockets in flight?

[@zoolkhan]

magic!

[@germanion0388]

Maybe German Air craft carier Graf Zeppelin could be new next update as a premium ship

[@TheOneTrueZweiZwei]

I feel like this whoukd have veen a choice the RTS of the carrier was exciting for me i wish that we could have both thr possibility of controlling all planes while being able to click a key to give you full control of a squadron i feel like this would have been a better option since you can have critical moments in where you can control the plane as 3rd person while possibly returning back to rts to coordinate a torpedo missle bomb attack

[@buzzzbag]

Make for the AA built because I have no freakin idea "how it works" :)

[@chipsterb4946]

Yes please WG explain how AA “works” now. AFT doesn’t extend range, Manual AA does little to nothing useful, AA mod 1 (seriously why bother). Some ships that had great AA before seem lacking while others like NC are great. And that’s not all! Even a good AA ship will get lots of kills in one encounter and nothing in the next.

[@tragedyofwind]

great, before the next vid, i am not playing wows, so i don't go in without knowing how the new AA works.

[@joshgray6038]

What if you add a consumable or other for cruisers and destroyers that had their main guns also equipped with AA shells?

[@blitzkrieg2142k]

I like controlling a squadron, but only 2 planes attacking at a time, by the time I get back to attack again I've lost the majority of my planes. Wish this was a extra feature. Ie RTS style is less accurate but you can cover more stuff and with planning out like before, could be accurate. And this, to make highly accurate hits, but you are out of the overall loop of the match.

[@CrimsonAlchemist]

Whoever came up with this new gameplay should be fired

[@user-vo3ke2eq4h]

They should make this new game play low tier and the old game play for high tiers

[@cheesebisacorn3099]

Welp, guess they're throwing the RTS fans out the window.

[@glhfggwp6232]

Damn I missed a lot seem like, this is awesome. I’m downloading this game again. I always have lag problems 😂

[@TobiasL1000]

Can we just select if we want to play with CVs or not?