People forgot that Liverpool were still on top after that match what really killed them was the 3-3 draw against Crystal Palace
@redkhamelejoon15997 ай бұрын
Finally someone actually remembers. Blowing that 3 goal lead had Suarez crying cause he knew they screwed up big time 👍👍
@masnun12177 ай бұрын
History repeats itself once again
@ColGesso6 ай бұрын
@@redkhamelejoon1599 even if they’d hung on and won 3-0 against CP, it wouldn’t have mattered. At that point they were set to tie Man City and Man City was up +9 in goal differential. They would have had to win like 12-0.
@aussiegreek49935 ай бұрын
City still had a game in hand when Liverpool drew 3-3 at palace
@Zinomulla-5 ай бұрын
@@aussiegreek4993 but if they had won this game they would have gone first and had been level on goal difference with city then again if they gotten a point against Chelsea they would have won the league
@RespecTheLevYT Жыл бұрын
It was Kolo Toures fault when he passed it to ODEMWINGIOooo at West Brom
@daniilanisimov77 Жыл бұрын
I'm a huge football(soccer) fan,so big thanks for the awsome video
@PeterAnderson-z4y8 ай бұрын
That slip by Steven Gerrard from Mahamadou Sakho's pass was horrific. Liverpool just intended to go out and blow them away, but struggled to break them down and lost 2-0 to a team that rested players for a midweek European Cup game v Athletico Madrid.
@omalone11696 ай бұрын
Did they go out?
@zubairhoosen8441 Жыл бұрын
I was around 12 at the time and I vividly remember the disappointment in my dad's face as we both sat there dumbstruck, ofcourse Gerrard would also go along and lose his final game for Liverpool💔
@classicsportclassictiyl85476 ай бұрын
The 2013/14 Premier League season imparted a crucial lesson: a formidable attack can only take you so far, while a solid defence can secure victory. One cannot succeed without the other; both are essential. Manchester City exemplified this balance with a potent offence, netting 102 goals thanks to the prolific efforts of Aguero, Dzeko, and particularly Yaya Touré, coupled with a staunch defence that conceded only 37 goals, the second-best record in the league. In contrast, Liverpool boasted an impressive attack with 101 goals but were let down by a porous defence that allowed 50 goals. Chelsea, the third contender in the title race, had the opposite issue. Under Jose Mourinho's management, they had the league's strongest defence, conceding just 27 goals. However, their lacklustre attack, with only 71 goals scored-about 30 less than both Liverpool and City-proved costly. The underperformance of their strikers Torres, Eto'o, and Ba, who collectively managed only 19 goals, was a significant factor in their failure to clinch the title. Mourinho addressed this shortfall by acquiring Costa the following year, which promptly resulted in a championship win.
@nduduzodube15937 күн бұрын
Henderson's injury cost liverpool the league that year, Henderson playing as a number 6 won us the league in 2020 Respect #JH14
@toppermana7 ай бұрын
Who come here again after Liverpool loss 0-1 from Crstal Palace at Anfield 2024??? 😅
@Mo3bdulla7 ай бұрын
It’s happening AGAIN
@jacquesprocureur99673 ай бұрын
The imaginary "Sterling offside" at Etihad stadium cost Liverpool title 2013-14
@johnjohn76ify2 ай бұрын
People talk about the slip. I say that it was a horror first touch by Gerrard. Ba was already getting away when Gerrard fell.
@ay613 Жыл бұрын
They conceded too many goals.
@mitchelljack1590 Жыл бұрын
Great video
@Orillionn7 ай бұрын
Jose Mourinho ❤❤❤
@donttalkoverbarz37857 ай бұрын
So basically, Liverpool being in a title race was all Gerrards work, but losing it in the last 4 games was everyone’s fault except Gerrards? 😂
@davidvarey50723 ай бұрын
Gerard, was finished by the point. He couldn’t read the game well enough to play the defendant role pace has gone very couldn’t play upfront anymore. Look how many goals have conceded that season. Anybody else would’ve got called out he was the defending midfielder he couldn’t play.
@jerodallen7 ай бұрын
Nah slip away is crazy
@pf77468 ай бұрын
There's a lot of nonsense talked about that season, including here. Liverpool could have played for a draw against Chelsea, but their winning streak had come from an attacking mindset, so suddenly playing for a draw would not have come naturally. The fact is that Mourinho (love him or hate him) produced a tactical masterclass, and Liverpool lost. It happens - it doesn't make it a bottle job. Similarly v Palace, Liverpool decided to go for it, having gone 3-0 up in the hope that they might some pressure on City's goal difference. It was a gamble that didn't come off but was worth taking. Again, not a bottle job. Bottle jobs are when teams revert to negativity when the key moments arrive - Liverpool did the opposite. City won the League that year, and Liverpool didn't, because City were 2 points better. (At least until the City FFP charges are resolved. 😉)
@InstigatorDJ5 ай бұрын
Oh please Liverpool over performed in that season. Luis Suarez carried the team by himself.
@urbanlegend5038 Жыл бұрын
slippy GGGGGG
@omalone11696 ай бұрын
And then Sunderland won at Chelsea
@About37Hobos Жыл бұрын
I love your content but Imma skip this one, don’t need the hurt right now.
@jahterminatedlmao5473 Жыл бұрын
bro is getting psychological and trying to find some deeper reason when the simple fact is that liverpool wouldve won if gerrard didnt slip and they didnt bottle the palace game 😂
@ColGesso6 ай бұрын
They would have needed to beat Crystal Palace by 11 goals for it to even matter. Winning 3-0 would still have meant they’d tie with Man City but be down -11 in goal differential.
@teeqx73612 ай бұрын
@@ColGessoif they got a point at Chelsea and didn’t choke in crystanbul slippy g would have a premier league but a slip is a slip