@@tinuvarun5806 "Beauty is in the eye of the beholder"
@DanSmithBK3 жыл бұрын
One fact that was missed from this particular video... jet fuel is not taxed like petrol or diesel in your car. If it was, then the airplane would lose the battle. It only wins because the airline industry has friends in high places (no pun intended).
@jet49263 жыл бұрын
You have a point regarding taxes.
@rkan23 жыл бұрын
Airlines usually also have other major tax advantages too... Like say your Irish Aircraft Lessor..
@misham65473 жыл бұрын
on the other hand those taxes are for maintaining the road so it makes no sense to charge them just like offroad fuel is also untaxed, unless we start charging carbon taxes
@DanSmithBK3 жыл бұрын
@@misham6547 only about ten percent of the taxes on fuel are used to maintain the roads in the UK!
@misham65473 жыл бұрын
@@DanSmithBK in the UK
@Ananth81933 жыл бұрын
Simple flying A380 livery looks good 😉😉😉😉
@filthywings3533 жыл бұрын
Hardly any 747s carried 500 passengers over a 5 hour flight. Most carried 350 to 380 passengers.
@coldforgedcowboy3 жыл бұрын
They used 500, to simplify the math, these are journalists not engineers.
@spongebubatz3 жыл бұрын
I flew on a 747(-400) with around 400 seats, standard for the airline
@coldforgedcowboy3 жыл бұрын
@@spongebubatz ... This is why the 747 is being replaced by the 777-9 which can seat 426 people.
@cade_olson3 жыл бұрын
Really curious how much fuel something like a 777-300 ER would need for a 13 hr flight to qatar or tokyo.
@meme-od2vs8 ай бұрын
About 110,000 litres are enough, considering no hard turbulence on its journey .
@Chris_at_Home3 жыл бұрын
I commuted to work for years and the pilot of the 737 told us it took 7 gallons per person in a full plane to take us 631 miles. When you think about that and it only took 1 hr and 40 minutes it is pretty amazing.
@rkan23 жыл бұрын
Meh, not really.. With a sufficiently designed boat, you could probably take a similar mass than the said 737 a similar distance on the sea with a similar amount of fuel as per person. Of course it would take a week or thee, but..
@Chris_at_Home3 жыл бұрын
@@rkan2 you can’t get a boat there most of the year as it is frozen. The distance by water is way over 1000 miles to get there.
@rkan23 жыл бұрын
@@Chris_at_Home Ever heard of icebreakers? Should work fine for most seasonal ice.
@CocoaBeachLiving3 жыл бұрын
79% of people that haven't subscribed, but a lot of the channels I watch have less than 5% subscribed, so you're doing better than most 😁 yes, I'm subscribed 😉
@larrydugan14413 жыл бұрын
The 777 is more fuel efficient than the 747 and the belly cargo is the equivalent of a fully loaded 18 wheeler. Not an insignificant amount.
@trevorgwelch7412 Жыл бұрын
Remember a 777-300 ER is more fuel efficient then 4 people in a Honda Civic ( University Study )
@59jm249 ай бұрын
Same true of all modern aircraft.
@tinuvarun58068 ай бұрын
High power to weight and bypass ratio.
@trob09143 жыл бұрын
INTERESTING! I wonder(somebody's already figured it) in comparison, how much fuel the first B 707s and DC-8s burned per hour?? Thanks..
@harrybarodawala35883 жыл бұрын
707-300 is about 7.2 tonnes an hour and the DC-8 about 8 tonnes
@trob09143 жыл бұрын
@@harrybarodawala3588 Thanks, I appreciate your response!
@CLdriver19603 жыл бұрын
Thank you for pointing out the economics of air travel. What we tend to overlook is the incredible speeds that these machines are capable of while delivering a low passenger seat mpg. As we know, speed costs $$
@jsmorrow66003 жыл бұрын
Do airliners use Fuel System Icing Inhibitor (FSII)?
@Art_bor3 жыл бұрын
3 minutes late man i actually was thinking about this 3 days ago tnx for this vid 👍
@fkaptijn71113 жыл бұрын
Miles, gallon? What is it? The majority of the people use liters and km, or in the aviation nautical mile
@Art_bor3 жыл бұрын
The a380 looks *gorgeous* awesome job 👌
@TheFirePilot3 жыл бұрын
Fuel questions are always a topic people are interested in. Have to say I am one of them as well. Thanks!
@SimpleFlyingNews3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the feedback! - TB
@nanettewalker40653 жыл бұрын
Where do they put the fuel? How do they manage “Sloshing” movement of large amounts of fuel. How long does it take to file a plane… how much fuel comes out of those hoses compared to a fire hose or other high pressure hoses..? So many questions…
@sexigrande17923 жыл бұрын
Fuel is stored in the wings and centre fuselage tanks. Some large aircraft even store fuel in the tail. Tanks are often design with bulkhead webs or baffles to reduce sloshing. Some even use foam I believe. Fueling times vary depending on the amounts, among already onboard, number of hoses, type of aircraft etc. Fuelling hoses generally operate at approximately 50 psi if my memory serves me right. Note: I was a fuel tank repair mechanic for a number of years.
@Grouuumpf2 жыл бұрын
Hi, maintenance technician here. We have an *old* refueling trailer at work when our 737 come and go. Ours is rated for 600L per minute, I'm guessing newer ones may push more than that. Takes about half an hour to fill our 737-400 to the brim. And as the other commenter said, there are baffles in the tanks to reduce sloshing. Every couple of baffles, one is completely watertight in one way with valves to let the fuel flow inboard but not outboard.
@actemple32823 жыл бұрын
Great blog keep up the good work
@SimpleFlyingNews3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the feedback! - JS
@leonard.c Жыл бұрын
One question, how can a flight from London to NY be 25.000$? They need around 50 tons of fuel, and unfortunately the price per kg is not 0,5$
@pedjarudnikpcservis9 ай бұрын
Where putting this amount of fuel?
@JosipRadnik12 жыл бұрын
Well, I don't think comparing the fuel consumption of an almost fully loaded airplane on a long distance flight with the consumption of a car that has just one person in it. You'll have to put 4 people in the car (which normally would take up to 5 people) in order to have a fair comparison - or take 3 people for the car and 400 people for the plane - that'll be more realistic anyway.
@johnn35422 жыл бұрын
What about short flights with small private jets? Or any large pleasure vehicle. Hate seeing someone in some huge 4x4 vehicle, truck is one thing but you don't need no hummer. Or the 100k pickup just to drive to your office job.
@B512173 жыл бұрын
Awesome and Nice video 👍☺️
@SimpleFlyingNews3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the feedback! - JS
@dock_845424 күн бұрын
Riddle me this how are they put 18,000 gallons in the wings of a plane and doesn’t make sense.
@craigbrown535910 ай бұрын
Outstanding!!!
@MrBat0002 жыл бұрын
You got it wrong at 3:14 about fuel consumption. Its not $25000 for fuel... Its over $250,000 on fuel. big diff.
@harrybarodawala35883 жыл бұрын
1:10 can you please include the metric system as well? about 95% of the world, can't imagine half a million miles without a caculator
@SimpleFlyingNews3 жыл бұрын
We're working on it. Unfortunately, it'll take time to trickle through to our videos. - TB
@InfiniteHorizons3 жыл бұрын
It is about 804 672 KM
@will8914103 жыл бұрын
I subscribed.
@EricPham-gr8pg8 ай бұрын
I heard it consume on the average 3 galon / minute fly but that could be equal to fighter jet
@danielyoungblood85252 жыл бұрын
What about millitary planes?
@timwynn60793 жыл бұрын
atr 72-600 drinks about 242 gal/hr, much less than turbo fans.
@j.s.73353 жыл бұрын
I actually think a lot about fuel burn. If you think about it, 1 gallon per second isn't a lot. You figure you're going a mile each 6 seconds, so that's only six gallons per mile, carrying hundreds of people. As a fun aside, you can measure the speed pretty well when flying over the central US where the roads are a mile apart. It will be a little under 6 seconds between when each road passes under the edge of the wing.
@rkan23 жыл бұрын
But then again... 6 gallons per mile would allow for with mpg you could run ~355 Toyota Priuses (59mpg/0.166mpg) the same distance. With electric vehicles that number would also be around twice as high if ee consider the MPGe. Also 355 priuses would weigh around 500 tons, though also considerably more if you were to carry 4 passengers in each.
@ramprasaddas52903 жыл бұрын
@0:52 the calculation of Conversion of 18000 Gals is Wrong, it should be 18000 x 3. 79= 68,220. But you guys have written 68.137 L which is too small compared to the 18000 even.
@wearethemags66133 жыл бұрын
Before we go any further, please do us a favour & STOP NAGGING PEOPLE TO SUBSCRIBE! It really means a lot...
@alphaadhito3 жыл бұрын
Types of normal fuel load: Trip fuel, diversion fuel, reserve fuel, contingency fuel, taxi fuel and some additional fuel Air Canada Flight 143: What trip fuel?
@nurrizadjatmiko213 жыл бұрын
That's great
@theperson1852 жыл бұрын
35x1800 roughly is 63k if you drove only highway with no stopping at all
@habun_islam3 жыл бұрын
Nice
@mann25203 жыл бұрын
Well it does depend on the distance so
@rajeshmohan10023 жыл бұрын
Modern jet engines only use 22 percent of there power when at there cruising altitudes where there is less air density which means less drag for them, in fact at take off a jet engine needs to use full power, 100 percent engine power available to it because of the air drag.
@timwilson87283 жыл бұрын
Why are you using a 747-400, an aircraft that has been retired by almost all airlines? I know it is the extreme example, but it would have been better to compare an efficient 787 with other fleets.
@FreeJulianAssange232 жыл бұрын
When does he get to the point?
@sinblago2 жыл бұрын
The answer is "they spent a lot of fuel but its cheap "shortly.
@killefitz353 жыл бұрын
The world is metric. I've subscribed this very interesting channel, but will unsubscribe, if finally you don't learn, that the metric system is world standard. It is for fueling a plane, as it is for all kinds of scientists. Even in the USA, Australia and the UK, although still not used in public. Not using metric lead to crashed Mars probes and sailing passenger planes without fuel. Use terms, that are used worldwide within the industry, fuel is liters, weight is kilograms, distances are nautical miles. If someone is here for indepth information about airplane industry, he'll know the terms and can work with that. Although I like the simple flying A 380 very much. Keep on with your excellent work, but keep industry terms, not those from the grocery store.
@timmanboy13 жыл бұрын
The aviation standard is the imperial system in all certified aircraft manufacturers like Boeing or Airbus
@kaxrimm3 жыл бұрын
Do u thing the big planes will ever come back?
@coldforgedcowboy3 жыл бұрын
Not with current birth rates below replacement, we won't that kind of density on an aircraft.
@veryfrozen3271 Жыл бұрын
Where is the 1,800 gallons stored??
@MrChrisRP17 күн бұрын
In a NASA basement Hollywood pool.
@ivanz32222 жыл бұрын
When u realize that full tank of fuel in your car one aircraft burns in about 60 seconds. That's insane
@YungCarl10 Жыл бұрын
Even more insane when u realise that planes store enough fuel to fill about 1500 bathtubs…
@bryanbufton Жыл бұрын
Remember you got to get to the airport Add the fuel for the total trip
@shubhambhuwania27693 жыл бұрын
Quite short i was looking for something more detailed
@wafflehorse14233 жыл бұрын
Hi I’m first viewer
@EricPham-gr8pg8 ай бұрын
Contract luggage carrier separate save time and fuels
@ulukhan3 жыл бұрын
How am I so early
@Inspiron315 Жыл бұрын
Actually airplane turbine doesn't consume fuel when reached 40,000 feet and it's 500 mph research.
@Jodyrides2 жыл бұрын
A typical passenger commercial jet gets .2 miles per gallon or, 5 gallons per mile. A greyhound bus gets 6 miles per gallon To fly the New York Jets football team from New York to Pittsburgh takes approximately 1400 to 1600 gallons of jet fuel.. that does not take into consideration the amount of fuel used while in a holding position, waiting The entire team and equipment could be carried by two greyhound type buses. To make that same trip, a single bus would use approximately 63 gallons of fuel, two buses would use 126 gallons of fuel.. A savings of approximately 1400 gallons.. if we really want to save the earths environment. We should eliminate nonessential air flights. At any given moment, there are thousands of commercial passenger jets in the air. A typical Jet carries around 60,000 gallons of fuel.. A typical commercial airliner will burn 36,000 gallons of fuel every 10 hours.. to make those planes pay for themselves, their airlines have to keep those planes in the air 20 hours a day.. that’s over 70,000 gallons of fuel used by a typical airliner every day..Do some math, 1000 claims burns 70,000,000 gallons of fuel every day. That amount of fuel requires 11,700 gasoline tank trucks to transport. And that’s just considering how much fuel just 1000 planes use. There are 5000 planes in the air at every moment of the day 24 hours a day just over the United States… that comes out to 350,000,000 gallons of jet fuel being burned just over the United States every single day.. are all those trips to Disneyland and to visit Florida and the Grand Canyon really that important? If people would take the train or the bus or even drive, that would really save the amount of carbon being dumped into the atmosphere every single day.. keep this in mind. 80% of the population of the United States has never been on a plane. All that fuel is being burned by less than 20% of the population..80% of the country population is getting along without flying
@PaulEdsall-y8s20 күн бұрын
Have you seen the amount of planes in the air at any one time, it’s a lot of fuel being burnt, climate change ( if as true and dire as we have been told ) could just about stop if they stopped air travel. It can’t be that dire
@MrChrisRP17 күн бұрын
Only, this video is a lie all the same as your fake climate anything. That's not for you to worry about, the climate in general, on any level. I designed rocks so that they may never fly over your head, nor anywhere else. Imagine that: All these years and you thought they were doing just that. Just no. Thank you and you're welcome. G'day.
@harrybarodawala35883 жыл бұрын
0:03 haha, most of us take this granted because there are people more better qualified to look after it called pilots 😂
@ecomindedchoice3 жыл бұрын
Does 18,000 gallons of jet fuel really cost only $25,000, sounds kind of low to me?
@Hattonbank3 жыл бұрын
No tax on it.
@bryanbufton Жыл бұрын
If your car is carrying one person then you should compare the plane with one person. I take 5 people in my car, so leave me alone, the best I ever got was 80 to the gallon.
@MD-md4th Жыл бұрын
This is silly! The comparison must be based on trip, not vehicle. To fly from NYC to London on the most efficient planes available ( 787 & A350 ) with all seats occupied burns about 40-45 gallons of fuel per seat. That’s not terrible, until you think how long it takes the average driver to use 40-45 gallons of fuel. Frequent and or long-distance flying is about the most environmentally damaging thing you can do as an individual, far worse than driving. The real issue is whether the trip should be made at all. I am not a green zealot - I love to fly and I do fly.
@zk90583 жыл бұрын
What’s with the 79% of you who haven’t yet subscribed?
@虎ちゃん-v8t3 жыл бұрын
No electric plane?
@bw74713 жыл бұрын
DOPE!
@GypsyHunter232UK2 жыл бұрын
They got no need to use fosil fuels now they have Alien E.T power technologies
@searching6163 жыл бұрын
I now support air travel
@johnkean68523 жыл бұрын
According to a KZbin channel planes only need fuel to get them in the air; then once buoyant they only require air to keep the turbines turning. *Don't kill the messenger* It seems pretty convincing to me. 😐 _Watch the channel first before you opinionate in the commentary please._
@petedambski37924 ай бұрын
Where does all that fuel fit? LOL
@physicsunderstander49584 ай бұрын
In the wings. the wing tanks on a 737 hold 28,800 gallons of fuel each.
@gooner723 жыл бұрын
A car maybe more economical but a car can't get to 35,000 ft, doesn't give you the experience an aircraft can and can't fly across as ocean.... argument over, job done!!
@GyanPrakash3 жыл бұрын
7
@Servant-Of-Al-Qudus2 жыл бұрын
La ilaha illAllah.
@iownmystrawman66002 жыл бұрын
None! It's a hoax
@alexf9622 жыл бұрын
LMAo sure honey.
@davidanderson291510 ай бұрын
Ok Tesla. How about some electric airplanes? 😂
@ulukhan3 жыл бұрын
8 views 9 likes ??
@david.stachon3 жыл бұрын
If you'd like to be depressed, every pound of fuel turns into about three pounds of CO2 when burned.
@coldforgedcowboy3 жыл бұрын
Trees need to breath too!
@david.stachon3 жыл бұрын
@@coldforgedcowboy They have too much to breath, and unfortunately can't keep up.
@TheLostfoundation3 жыл бұрын
Better turn off the electricity to your house and walk to wherever you want to go and plant your own food
@david.stachon3 жыл бұрын
@@Cartoonman154 yes. We need to fix that.
@david.stachon3 жыл бұрын
@@TheLostfoundation yeah, I'm sure that'll fix it.
@emilioiglesias74012 жыл бұрын
F*** affordable but a what price? So polluting
@jahu353 жыл бұрын
feet, gallons, miles and pounds ? it's not like it's way more convenient to use metric measurements right 🥴 ?
@cdimmm Жыл бұрын
fill it up on a scale.
@sexigrande1792 Жыл бұрын
That’s why there’s fuel capacitance probes.
@bigfish74933 жыл бұрын
Depending upon the aircraft Type, the fan-jet, turbo-prop, pure turbo jet, reportedly consume more petro based fuel per person (passenger) than competitive forms of transport. The trade-off is speed/time. Please consult the various websites that report estimations of fuel-burn and related yields of pollutants that are emitted by aircraft. Keep in mind that over 10,000 aircraft are said to be airborn at any one time around be this planet. If you live under a flight path, you're already polluted, same as living nearby to any major autoroute. We inhale minute particles of spent petroleum fuels, automobile cast-offs such as brake pad and fanbelt residue, and everything else that can be expended for the sake of producing and converting heat energy into kinetic motion. That is the basic reason why life as we know it on planet Earth is imperiled.
@sabine48672 жыл бұрын
Seems strange to have fuel in the tail,wings .Sthing doesn't sound right. Planes carry so much fuel 🤔
@paulshepherd82952 жыл бұрын
Look at it this way. An average car engine produces about 150 horsepower. Just one of the two engines on a Boeing 777 produces 110,000 horsepower (no, that's not a typo). It burns about 3 tons of fuel an hour. A long flight can be 15 hours duration. That's why they need so much fuel.
@ATLMike942 жыл бұрын
Aircraft wings are EXTREMELY big. You can't really tell from the inside of a plane
@vashishnaipaul2315 Жыл бұрын
This is false information
@stensballe36833 ай бұрын
they run on compressed air though 🤡
@speedbird9313Ай бұрын
🤣🤪🤦🏻♂️
@aviator3563 жыл бұрын
you neads to tell this to grean peas lol
@clarifiedevidence5302 жыл бұрын
Liars
@alexf9622 жыл бұрын
Huh? Oh right, only compressed air, right? Poor you gullible fools...
@wafflehorse14233 жыл бұрын
You know what else uses 1 gallon per second my crappy American made car
@mattdaddy_88810 ай бұрын
I can only just immagine Greta Thumberg watching this video 💀
@MatthewHarding0073 жыл бұрын
1st
@ethank65643 жыл бұрын
Noo! You just beat me lol
@MarcusNesbitt43 жыл бұрын
For once you actually are
@angelaashford58442 жыл бұрын
Want the truth
@speedbird93132 жыл бұрын
And?🤷🏻♂️
@Ex-Pear-Rocker Жыл бұрын
Most people can't handle the truth!
@MrKlinton1987 Жыл бұрын
This is bs how you can put 200tons of fuel in 747 into wings 🤣🤣
@7KIslands Жыл бұрын
This propaganda for the gullible 🤣
@sinblago2 жыл бұрын
The answer is "they spent a lot of fuel but its cheap "shortly.