How the "Missing Mass" Problem Leads to Dark Matter!

[@ArvinAsh]

Full video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/foOwg2qbgrB_sJI - "Why Dark Matter Probably Exists & What It LOOKS like!"

[@grproteus]

...so...the Dark Matter surrounds and binds the galaxy together... with the Force of gravity?

[@damanybrown5036]

19 what??? The closed captioning stated book where he is naming a year??? 😅

[@SapphireSpire]

I read somewhere that space itself can have mass.

[@Worker225]

Whaat did you say? That sentence has no meaning to me lol!

[@MarsStarcruiser]

Not sure what to call it per se, but I read that somewhere too. 5 proton’s worth of energy per cubic meter of ‘space’

[@richardchapman1592]

Or lack of mass in comparison to galaxies, such that MOND would suggest gravitational attraction is weaker in inter galactic space because of a smaller average mass per volume changes the inverse square law.

[@richardchapman1592]

Likely somebody will say that the inverse square law is immutable but it's only verified by fairly reliable measures of gravity within the milky way. All further distance measures use inverse square laws when assessing the space extent even if cephids are accurate on frequency standards. The whole scaling of the cosmos needs reexamining not only from it's fundamental constant assumptions but also assumptions of invariance of our fundamentals. I'll grant though that the simplicity of the Lorentz transforms is a tempting argument against these other possibilities.

[@paulomarcos9941]

Isn't this also happening to the movement of stars in a galaxy? The stars in the outer rings are moving faster than those in the center, witch is contrary to gravity and what happens in solar system were planets near sun move faster than the ones far from the sun.

[@MichaelSBaram]

You should watch the full video. He ties the two phenomena together quite neatly.

[@philipsamways562]

Hi. Yes, you're correct. In a solar system, virtually all the mass is contained in the central star, and the size of a typical solar system is hugely less than the size of a galaxy. To make the outer stars circle the centre more rapidly, extra mass is required, and this is one of the origins of the dark matter concept.

[@philipsamways562]

Mind you, I have my own theory on this

[@PsykraM]

Or maybe not.

[@richb2229]

Or that there is an effect of gravity that is unknown to current science. Since gravity is what’s bending the light, not directly from the mass.

[@Worker225]

Yeah, mass and gravity are related in only some ways

[@KaliFissure]

DM is decayed Neutrons. Amorphous monatomic hydrogen in a Rydberg state. DE is the expansion caused by that decay from neutron 0.6fm³ to 1m³ of amorphous hydrogen gas. A volume increase of around 10⁴⁵ Quantum Cyclic Cosmology A homeostatic universe maintained by the reciprocal processes of electron capture and neutron infall at event horizons and free neutron emergence and decay in deep voids.

[@AisleEpe-oz8kf]

I have a more feral interpretation in that the energies of human scale to galaxical scale has such an energetic source or past component that the position of the energies transition states to the component time dilation the fields collapse into the singular transition point. The purchase is combustion local, in this instance galaxical. The intensity of the galaxy in the region of transition itself should be enough to explain expansion at the galaxical ending of energetic density darkmatter gives rose to energetc expansion darkenergy field. Would the space decide expansion rate, the compression factors, and the matings of appatent trajectory through time dilation. I see three dimensions of space and two of time. thanks, i seem to be losing my brevity if not my better senses.

[@viniciusdomenighi6439]

Everyone knows that dark matter is star systems downgraded to the second dimension by hostile aliens lol hahaha