How to Analyze Hearsay on an Evidence Essay (Pt. 2): What is NOT Hearsay? (FRE 801(d))

[@perfectly-imperfect3510]

My head was spinning before I watched this video. All of the sudden, everything makes so much more sense now. Thank you!

[@Flaherty1984]

I am currently a paralegal student taking an evidence class. Your Hearsay videos have really helped me understand the material we are learning this week. Thank you!

[@studicata]

Awesome. Glad this helped! 👍

[@mariabaraya9129]

Thank you for your videos, they have been super helpful! Honestly they are the best thing I've seen so far! You are very talented!!

[@studicata]

No problem, happy to help! Thank YOU for the support.

[@electricalgenius6675]

Please note, both of your lecture videos on FRE 801(c) and FRE 801 (d) are about to extremely relevant. Thank you for breaking this down in such a simple manner for those of us who aren't law students. I personally found these videos trying to research what "hearsay" is and whether or not the Trump impeachment will be able to proceed legally. Looks like it will despite what the talking heads are saying! Thanks!

[@rmistry123]

I'm a little late to discovering your videos for my Feb 2019 exam but they have been extremely helpful even on such short notice! Thanks for putting these up! In the unfortunate event that I do not make it through, I'll definitely look into signing up for Studicata.

[@studicata]

Thank you for the support! Hopefully, we do not hear from you. 🙏

[@idontnoapassword]

Hey man, this is an amazing video!!!! So I'm not a law student or anything but i've been getting interested into law for a recent bit of time. I started to learn about many legal rules, including hearsay and realizing that there were multiple exceptions. I really wanted to inform myself and stumbled across your video. You're videos are so informative, even someone such as myself with no legal schooling can follow. Without having the stop rewind the video go back. Rewatch the same part over nad over again... I can watch your entire 20 minute video in almost one take, thanks to how well you break down each and every part of hearsay. You do an amazing job of keeping me on track and understanding through the whole video. Great job!

[@niasenior]

This video may be the reason I pass evidence this semester! You are doing God's work

[@krystlejohnson5943]

I have watched your lectures for several different subjects. They are all wonderful. Thank you!

[@marksman9249]

Hi Michael, does 801(d)(1) only apply when declarant witness is subject to cross examination 20:01. Prior consistent statement is only offered in evidence in redirect examination after credibility is attacked in cross examination right?

[@studicata]

🚨 SPECIAL OFFER: Want to crush law school finals, rack up scholarship $$$, pass the bar exam, and practice law like a BOSS? Take the LEAP. Get started today for free at: www.studicata.com/leap

[@kitsomatlhape8461]

Will be taking the July bar and already paid for one the commercial bar prep courses😩😢 but this is so good!

[@studicata]

No problem-you got this! Thanks for tuning in.

[@rexmalin6761]

Love the videos, just a quick question. Does the declarant have to be present and subject to cross examination in order to use 801(d)(2)? Thank you!

[@LoveMeOrHateMe156]

Rex Malin no.

[@saralavancher]

This guy should run for president

[@ATBP3]

You are the best! Thank you so much!

[@studicata]

Sure-happy to help!

[@amberfromVT]

You. Are. A. Lifesaver.

[@timothystarks5053]

Msn you're good with this...very understandable....wow..thanks bro

[@ThePrincessme12]

oh my god this video helped me make sense of things! wow

[@valerierodriguez7088]

"Eric has been charged with a murder that occurred at midnight. Eric’s attorney wants to introduce Eric’s timecard which shows that he clocked in at 6:00PM and did not clock out until 2:00 the next morning." I know this is Hearsay, but whats the statement Eric's attorney showing the timecard in court?

[@mrsoul680]

Usually data produced by machines isn’t considered hearsay.

[@deanmichaux1451]

Just out of curiosity, is video #3 in the Evidence Crash Course set to private on purpose?

[@jayplaysgolf4500]

I have a question. If a police officer says to me. "Say one more word and your going to jail." And I say another word and he arrests me. Can I use that against the police officer in court in regards to violation of 1st amendment

[@Flavor88]

Yes, you can. You can argue that the statement is presented not for the truth of the matter (that you went to jail) but to show the affect it had on you (the listener) or the declarant state of mind, therefore it is not hearsay ;)

[@trainerjeff]

thank you very much for your videos

[@studicata]

Happy to help!

[@trainerjeff]

@@studicata I have my evidence midterm Tuesday and the way you have laid it out is much better than them way my professor has

[@ardwanasmith802]

thank-you!

[@studicata]

No problem, happy to help!

[@TaylorC1624]

Admin law please !!!

[@SqueakyWheelMakesNoise]

Who would give you a thumbs down on this video. For some odd reason I am thinking of the two guys in the evolution movie that wrote cells are bad and got a C- lol

[@actualsystem]

your halo is showing

[@_.Leo_.]

Off topic... but sexy speaker. :-)