Great video. Thank you for making it:) It would've been interesting to plot the same, but coloring the dots using the original labels as well. Then we can see how well the groupings done using unsupervised learning compared to the original labels!!
@StatisticsGlobe8 ай бұрын
Thanks for the kind words and the nice idea! It would definitely be nice to visualize this comparison. Next time! :)
@smartinssmart8 ай бұрын
nicely done! 👌
@StatisticsGlobe8 ай бұрын
Thank you so much, glad you like it! :)
@rodrigopalmacl8 ай бұрын
muy interesante estimado practicare con su ejercicio y agradezco su video.
@StatisticsGlobe8 ай бұрын
That's great to hear, Rodrigo! Glad the videos are helpful!
@ibrahimlawan96638 ай бұрын
Great video. Thank you. Is there any assumption before deciding to use PCA or PCoA?
@StatisticsGlobe8 ай бұрын
Thanks for the kind comment, Ibrahim! Glad you liked the video. Before using PCA (Principal Component Analysis), it's assumed that linear relationships exist in the data and that the most important variance directions are the ones to focus on. For PCoA (Principal Coordinates Analysis), the assumption is that distances or dissimilarities between data points can meaningfully reflect their relationships. So it depends on your specific data whether to use PCA or PCoA. I hope this helps!
@korman98722 ай бұрын
Thank you sir, i helps
@micha.statisticsglobe2 ай бұрын
You're most welcome! 🙂
@uselessminority60718 ай бұрын
what if PC1 and PC2 only explain lets say 75% of variance? how would you proceed? is that enought or is it possible to somehow add PC3 and PC4 in the analysis? Great video btw 👍👍
@jeanpascalkoh41238 ай бұрын
I think it still ok. However more PC becomes difficult for human perception of 3 or more dimensions. Cheers!
@jeanpascalkoh41238 ай бұрын
Nice presentation
@StatisticsGlobe8 ай бұрын
Hey, thanks for the great feedback, glad you like the video! Regarding your question: Yes, you can definitely add more components (and usually this is what you would do with a realistic data set). You would just have to change the number in this line of code from 2 to whatever number of components you would like to keep: my_pca_data <- data.frame(my_pca$x[ , 1:2]) Please note that it might become more difficult to visualize your data when using more components. I hope that clarifies your question! Regards, Joachim
@CryptoStop3606 ай бұрын
hello can u make video how to apply multi condtion to all items for data frame and combine with and + or i not find it on line thanks
@CryptoStop3606 ай бұрын
i mean apply condtion with and + or to alll items inside data frame
@StatisticsGlobe6 ай бұрын
Thanks for the topic suggestion, I'll keep it in mind.
@gopaltiwarifulАй бұрын
when in performed this code with my data R showing "Error: unexpected invalid token in "my_pca" this any suggestion?
@StatisticsGlobeАй бұрын
Hey, did you run the code exactly as demonstrated in the video?
@gopaltiwarifulАй бұрын
@@StatisticsGlobe Yes as it is
@StatisticsGlobeАй бұрын
That's weird, to be honest, I don't know why this is happening. On my side, everything works fine.
@gopaltiwarifulАй бұрын
Error: unexpected invalid token in "my_pca
@StatisticsGlobeАй бұрын
Please see my response to your other question.
@uma91837 ай бұрын
thank you sir, but provide your script of code in notepad format ;; my suggestion only
@StatisticsGlobe7 ай бұрын
Hey, thanks for your kind comment. I assume you could simply copy and paste the code from the description into notepad, couldn't you?
@uma91837 ай бұрын
@@StatisticsGlobe I am telling in your channel space point of view, and other also convient ;; thank you for your response
@uma91837 ай бұрын
please make video satellite data handle in R
@StatisticsGlobe7 ай бұрын
Thanks for the topic suggestion! I'm not an expert on this, but it might be a nice topic for the future.