How to Beat $0.10/$0.25 w/ Ante on Pokerstars! - Jarretman 2020 Poker

GL on the tables guys :)

[@OnlineStarRR]

Yes please. Would be amazing to hear your thoughts on brm subject...

[@onezerotwofour184]

OnlineStarRR 100BI

[@FATFILMSABLE]

Yes to the video about BRM and how to start out! :D

[@Santiago12pte]

Thanks for the vid. I'm really interesting to know about your thoughts about bankroll management in order be successful in poker.

[@simonlaoldpremaex4899]

yeah a video about BRM for taking Poker more seriously would be amazing! Really looking forward to this! :D

[@omountassir]

Thanks for the vid! I would be very interested on your point of view about bankroll management etc!

[@bernardocaula371]

Yes, it would be very nice to hear your thoughs on BRM! Great video and great explanations btw, ty!

[@beck32]

I would love a brm vid! If micros is for learning, what benchmark should I use to know when to move up?

[@shakes115]

In regards to limp vs raise in SB, I think population overfolds and under 3bets even to a small size

[@SLowPLaYaH]

I gave myself a headache staring at the monitor at close range, trying to figure out what your avatar is. Well played, Jarretman. Well played.

[@FrancoSchwarzbach]

You are the best!🙌🤙

[@Marinate305]

Interesting how the game dynamics change slightly with both the ante structure and how the sb is not 1/2 of the bb.

[@DonFoca]

I like your content.

[@user-eh3yg5zj3k]

Thak you for lesson bro! It'll will be perfect if you make video about brm!

[@equalizingrespectator9658]

Yeah we want that video for sure :)

[@susymay7831]

Yes. BR management would be a cool video.

[@ghjk5827]

Hey, man. Please, post the video about brm. We want to know your opinion about it! :)

[@Sawstinker]

Do you think that the ante justifes a preflop flatting /limping range even with microstakes rake? Does BB defending range increase a lot with the presence of the ante, and should we increase the range by calling more or 3betting more?

[@shakes115]

calling more, better odds

[@Sawstinker]

@@shakes115 but if we are calling more, should'nt we also be 3 betting more combos as well in order to keep the same ratio of 3!:calls?

[@shakes115]

What’s the reason of keeping ratio the same? I don’t think this is a thing

[@Sawstinker]

my thinking was that because villain is opening wider, if we only increase our call range, he will easily be able to attack our weaker than normal call range, so 3betting a few more value and bluff combos would prevent our calling range from being really weak. I'd assume there's a lot of EV in winning the pot preflop with a 3! in a high rake game rather than calling with a trash hand and hoping to realize equity . Am I wrong in this, can we increase just our calls simply because we have better lot odds with the ante?

[@shakes115]

I'd be happy to discuss this more on a different platform, but KZbin doesn't seem to have a direct message feature..

[@keithjackson5531]

Its great that you done this video. I asked you a little while back about how to adjust to antes. I read an article by mmasher and he said you should raise bigger preflop, so now its confusing to see that you say that you didnt think so. I play 10NL and people are min raising and 2.2xing, arent you just giving insane odds to callers especially in bb? I have been raising bigger to 3.5x and dont know if it is hindering me or not. I think i also remember Ben Sauce saying that you should raise bigger at micros as you are playing weaker players so why wouldnt you want a bigger share of a bigger pot. Mind you I am still not really beating the games being around break even so maybe not true for me.

[@Jarretman]

RFI size should be the last thing you worry about imo. I said in the video anything between 2.2 and 3 is likely fine, and slightly bigger is also likely fine (especially from the BTN).

[@keithjackson5531]

@@Jarretman Ok thank you for continuing to post and reply, its appreciated.

[@shakes115]

It’s not the end of the world if BB often plays pots out of position with weak range

[@builderbobgg5151]

Calls every spot, gets shown the exact hand they're repping. Microstakes in a nutshell haha,

[@sielnachtt]

bankroll management video please :)

[@becauseistand]

did i understand it right? rake - 5% cap $3. lets image SB vs BB all-in. The pot is roughly = 200bb or $50. 5% rake will be $2,5. That's why these games are basically uncapped?

[@Jarretman]

yes :)

[@sharkyjawz1342]

On their website it says $0.5 rake cap?

[@MikeTHEBOSS]

YESS PLEASE

[@Sector13full]

Sound volume is 2 low but the rest is perfect ;)

[@modeob88]

Amazing!!!! Can you make more material for this kind of stake ?? But without antes.... Love the way you think poker !!!

[@leonardoegavaudan2813]

Please make that vid

[@paulicas1]

27:37 lol

[@justinharris7650]

Amazon content

[@petergriffin5687]

Its stupid to play Zoom at this Stakes.

[@petergriffin5687]

@Trevor Lahey it is not, its the main reason why player been stuck for to long on these limit, or can you achieve 10bb winrate in zoom pool? Table Selection is the one of the important things at these stakes noching else.

[@synchronium24]

It's a tradeoff. Playing more hands per hour on Zoom means you need a lower BB/100 winrate to generate the same amount of profit. Playing Zoom instead of soft tables also raises your skill level in the long term. Still, in general I suspect you are correct that table selecting is the better option.

[@ElPr3dator]

@@petergriffin5687 Table selection is one of the key aspects in any limit in order to attain a long term winning rate, no doubt. The zoom pool on the low limits being so big it is a kind of disadvantage, playing almost every hand against unknowns. Still, as a decent player (you don't have to be playing regularly this stakes) one could very easily recognize that in this very big pool, on one hand there is a very small percentage of regulars and they are also not fucking +15 bb grinders and on the other hand the recr. are very loosy goosy splashy players, not nits. So having an idea of the pool tendencies at this limits and playing solid poker (tight pre ranges, overfolding against agression without any reads and generally underbluffing) compensate - along with the number of hands you play - for the "poor table selection". So, yes, in theory it is very easily to achieve a decent winrate in this pools. In practice? Of course, you have to dedicate yourself studying, learning and looking always for +EV spots. Playing like a robot for years, not paying attention and not be willing to dedicate time for learning has an equal impact/signification for one being stucked . Table selection itself doesn't make you a winning player, unless you are paying attention to the other key aspects. It is all about...balance, in every aspect of poker and life.

[@petergriffin5687]

@Trevor Lahey its maybe 2 or 2.5 x volumen with 4 tables of zoom, but you will never be able to achieve a winrate like @ normal speed tables with less volumen. And the biggest missconception are that u think you improve only by playing, playing 1k Hands per Hour meens 3,5 second for any hand what u will learn at that short period of time. Lower Winrate means also larger BE or Downswings, and it means also you need a WAY tighter BRM.