🛠 Want to get started with freelancing? Let me help: www.datalumina.com/data-freelancer 📚 Learning Data/AI? Join for free: www.skool.com/data-alchemy 🚀 Building AI apps? Check out: launchpad.datalumina.com/ 💼 Need help with a project? Work with me: www.datalumina.com/solutions
@AnthonyAlcerro-v6dАй бұрын
We need a full tutorial on how to do evals 🙏
@daveebbelaarАй бұрын
Noted!
@IdPreferNot1Ай бұрын
Love that you chose to do a video on this. I wouldnt bet against Pydantic and see this a an even better version of Swarm.
@rossvegas820 күн бұрын
Thank you for the detailed explanation! It would be helpful to see a comparison between tool/function calling and multi-agent approaches, along with guidance on when to use each.
@eneskosar4649Ай бұрын
Very informative Dave, thanks for all the work. You're the best
@hosseinsamaei5779Күн бұрын
Thanks, Dave. A tutorial for running multiple agents interacting to reach a specific goal would be great!
@ReneLuijk-t4f14 күн бұрын
Great overview! I’ve been building something from scratch but am considering integrating parts of PydanticAI. In my use case, the code is designed to help users-specifically those who enjoy automating their workflows but aren’t programmers-operate at the simplest level of abstraction, enabling their agents to communicate and collaborate to accomplish tasks. In other words, I’m not directly exposing the Pydantic concept but aiming to simplify it further and create new abstractions that make automation more accessible for my user base
@juanantonionavarrojimenez2966Ай бұрын
The evaluation is perfect. That's the way. Thanks.
@jordan-kz3rxАй бұрын
Thank you man, this knowledge is really valuable and presented so well.
@rembautimes8808Ай бұрын
Great video and thanks for sharing. I think having a leaner stack is better because it’s quite easy for a big stack to introduce dependency conflicts. Also Pydantic’s integration with FastAPI is awesome 😂
@RobShocksАй бұрын
Great breakdown. I'm all for less abstraction. Having been in JS world for years there are so many frameworks and tools coming out just for the sake of it. Focus on the problem, reverse engineer and pick the right tool. In many cases you don't need the chainsaw to top a pencil.
@daveebbelaarАй бұрын
Exactly!
@jirivchiАй бұрын
thanks for all your content! it is very informative and helpful
@daveebbelaarАй бұрын
Thanks!
@mt512 күн бұрын
Hello Dave Ebbelaar, regarding the temperature, you can provide it like so: agent = Agent(model=model,model_settings={'temperature': 0.1}) but it doesn't actually change the behaviour (right now). I think, that needs to be implemented by the Pydantic team 🤔
@kenchang3456Ай бұрын
Thanks for all the information I appreciate it.
@khandelwal0shekhar0Ай бұрын
Dave I really want to know your take on phidata ?
@silver1544Ай бұрын
Thanks for your review! What would you recommend to use instead of PydanticAI at the moment (until it's matured)? Just using plain API?
@bmatlega27 күн бұрын
I would like to know that as well
@Geeisjudied16 күн бұрын
I would like to know this as well
@aleksandreliott544015 күн бұрын
Could you do a video on securing vector embeddings in postgres?
@PriyankBoliaАй бұрын
Please use bigger fonts like other channels, sometimes I use a laptop to watch, and its hard to read.
@daveebbelaarАй бұрын
Noted!
@AbuBakr125 күн бұрын
Exactly...very difficult to view text on the screen
@KivaltАй бұрын
Does it integrate with OpenRouter?
@chefzieherАй бұрын
Great video! I like that you are using the interactive execution in vscode/cursor. How do you debug that code? (I didn't figure that out yet)
@daveebbelaarАй бұрын
The interactive mode is great for debugging as well as you can just go line by line and execute your code.
@heheeheh9711Ай бұрын
Hoow is this Agentic Framework comapred to phidata Framework???
@heheeheh9711Ай бұрын
or AUTOGEN
@IdPreferNot1Ай бұрын
I thought llms loved json structure. Cool markdown utility function but why needed?
@daveebbelaarАй бұрын
It depends on the model. Claude prefers XML while OpenAI prefers Markdown or JSON. With small JSON files, it doesn't really matter, but we've found that the model can sometimes miss information with big nested JSON files. As with anything, you can test and compare for your use case to see if you really need the Markdown conversion. I've also found that Markdown is easier to debug when you're looking at it in your observability platform (like Langfuse). It's even more human readable than JSON. Hope that helps.
@IdPreferNot1Ай бұрын
@@daveebbelaar thank you!
@matthewchung7412 күн бұрын
where is the link to the interactive Jupyter env?
@devfaidevachАй бұрын
Please use bigger fonts. Thanks 👍
@micbab-vg2muАй бұрын
THANKS :)
@daveebbelaarАй бұрын
I can always count on you! 💪🏻
@artursradionovs9543Ай бұрын
Does PydanticAI support local running LLM’s?
@aristidefumagalli5100Ай бұрын
Yes OpenAI compatible endpoint
@artursradionovs954326 күн бұрын
@ how about OLLAMA?
@paturibharath794828 күн бұрын
good tutor
@PriyankBoliaАй бұрын
How does it compare to langchain?
@daveebbelaarАй бұрын
LangChain is an entire ecosystem. PydanticAI is a really lean framework for solving specific problems around data validation for LLMs. I prefer this leaner, more simple approach.
@TheOrionMusicNetworkАй бұрын
Skip langchain bro. Trust me. You don't need that pain in your life.
@daveebbelaarАй бұрын
@@TheOrionMusicNetwork 😂
@PriyankBoliaАй бұрын
@@daveebbelaar Any specific reasons? problems you faced. Trying learning langraph
@daveebbelaarАй бұрын
@@PriyankBolia LangChain’s ecosystem feels overly complex for me. I’ve faced versioning issues and had to dig through multiple abstraction layers to debug unimplemented features, which made troubleshooting a headache. I’d rather build lightweight, purpose-driven components from scratch. Avoiding frameworks helps keep my projects simpler, faster, and free of unnecessary dependencies.