Hi! Found from Reddit. Neat infinite, but you are playing Calculated Gamble wrong in the video (the combo still is doable here thanks to 0 cost draw) because while you resolve Gamble, you cannot put it in discard pile, so you draw to max and the one card in discard is Calculated Gamble. Then ofc you draw it with prepared f.e. and continue comboing off. Neat!
@3hourgames2 ай бұрын
@@Daspienownia ahhh, thanks! I wasn't quite sure on the order of resolving things, but I knew it should work
@Burpfishtaco2 ай бұрын
I would've thought that you resolve relfex's effect after calc gamble resolved thereby drawing gamble afterwards.
@imGrisky2 ай бұрын
This is correct@@Burpfishtaco
@Ohrami2 ай бұрын
@@imGrisky It's not correct. The rule book specifically states, • Being Played - While the card is being played, it isn’t in your hand or in your discard pile. • Resolve - Execute the card’s printed effects from top to bottom. Any abilities triggered by the card don’t take effect until after the card is finished resolving all of its text. • Cleanup - The card goes to your discard pile. So in this case, you would play Calculated Gamble, which discards your entire hand. Calculated Gamble would then draw the number of cards you discarded. Since your draw pile is empty, you would immediately reshuffle all of your newly discarded cards into your draw pile, then draw. Then, the effects of Reflex would trigger, thus drawing 3 additional cards. In this case, it can draw only 2 cards, then it will shuffle the now-empty discard pile into the draw pile to attempt to draw, but still find nothing, thus shuffling your draw pile twice. This also means it will trigger A Thousand Cuts twice. Then, after all of this is resolved, Calculated Gamble will finally go into your discard pile. You can now draw it with Prepared to continue the infinite combo. Note that this is in fact different from how the video game behaves, where you would indeed be correct. Reflex could in fact draw Calculated Gamble if you set up the exact same infinite combo in the video game, which may be where the confusion lies.
@JJW667Ай бұрын
@@OhramiTrue. Had to reread that part a couple times before I understood how to resolve this infinite properly.